Correction: .NET belongs to Microsoft (and they can have it), whereas Java *belongs* to no company. Java belongs to an entire community, and hence its enormous success. Oracle may be the new steward of Java, after the Sun acquisition, but they don't own Java.
Anyone using .NET is at the mercy of Microshaft. If Microshaft one day decides to pull the plug on .NET, or Microshaft dies, that's the end of .NET. No such thing can or will happen to Java as long as there is a Java community around.
meaning that an "open platform" is more loosely coupled than a "not so open platform", but true loose coupling is almost purely platform agnostic. That's why I wouldn't talk about windows or .Net or any framework (especially the proprietary ones) if you want to be more loosely coupled, platform promiscuous, or interoperable. The problem with loose coupling is that information wants to be free and a couple folks have some screws loose about information hiding.
It would be more enterprise-service-layer-oriented if you didn't specify a platform, but I specialize in "open platforms" ... which is the next best thing, I guess.
Correction: .NET belongs to Microsoft (and they can have it), whereas Java *belongs* to no company. Java belongs to an entire community, and hence its enormous success. Oracle may be the new steward of Java, after the Sun acquisition, but they don't own Java.
Anyone using .NET is at the mercy of Microshaft. If Microshaft one day decides to pull the plug on .NET, or Microshaft dies, that's the end of .NET. No such thing can or will happen to Java as long as there is a Java community around.
kossmikham 3 weeks ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You This video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA.
bebeheuy 1 month ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA.
Mjhond 1 month ago
I Love The video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA It Can Increase My Knowledge
anakmudajaman 1 month ago
Steady I Really Like This video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA.
NganaJHone 1 month ago
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always This video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA
willamricard 1 month ago
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You This video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA.
AntoMelta 1 month ago
I Really Like The Video From Your This video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA.
imegatrone 1 month ago
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing This video is part 1 and will discuss about SOA
bundawartini 1 month ago
This helped me, thanks!
tstruss912 5 months ago
For heaven's sake, put the pointer down. Continuously drawing over the slides the entire time is distracting.
oglysol 1 year ago
meaning that an "open platform" is more loosely coupled than a "not so open platform", but true loose coupling is almost purely platform agnostic. That's why I wouldn't talk about windows or .Net or any framework (especially the proprietary ones) if you want to be more loosely coupled, platform promiscuous, or interoperable. The problem with loose coupling is that information wants to be free and a couple folks have some screws loose about information hiding.
thatguyasher 1 year ago
It would be more enterprise-service-layer-oriented if you didn't specify a platform, but I specialize in "open platforms" ... which is the next best thing, I guess.
thatguyasher 1 year ago
Very well made and great information
curryzazle 1 year ago