@koshmaruk please do not 'love' me!!! I was talking about Metronomy being good...What are you on about.?? I did not see the other 2 bands so I cannot comment! And also 'lovey' I have a very wide gig knowledge but none too sure why I am even involved in an argument with someone like you! Maybe you try and get out a bit more!!!!
@missdove65 You started it - I stated from the start that Metronomy were top rate - I think you're looking for an argument but I'm not going to give you that. We all have different opinions, I'm happy to suggest that we agree on how good Metronomy were, however my gripe is with the quality of the support and the late hour that Metronomy came on. Chill out frgodsakes!!
@missdove65 Don't think so love - Metronomy were top rate but the others were shabby. Obviously your experience of gigs is thin to say the least, or you need to expand your musical taste
@naan0905 Nope - sorry, mate, like I said, Metronomy were tip top. You must have noticed the massive abyss in difference of quality, songs and general musical ability, surely, when Metronomy finally got their arses on stage - 9.45 pm guys?? Please!! London on a weeknight is a 'mare when you have work to get to........
@KoshmarUK well, the first band was boring, to say the least. Felt like they were on stage because they HAD TO. Second one a bit more interesting but... yeah, 9.45 pm was too late, had to wake up at four so I kinda felt it!
I can finally say that i was there :) the show was amazing
Pepperminttreeleaf 3 months ago
@koshmaruk please do not 'love' me!!! I was talking about Metronomy being good...What are you on about.?? I did not see the other 2 bands so I cannot comment! And also 'lovey' I have a very wide gig knowledge but none too sure why I am even involved in an argument with someone like you! Maybe you try and get out a bit more!!!!
missdove65 4 months ago
@missdove65 You started it - I stated from the start that Metronomy were top rate - I think you're looking for an argument but I'm not going to give you that. We all have different opinions, I'm happy to suggest that we agree on how good Metronomy were, however my gripe is with the quality of the support and the late hour that Metronomy came on. Chill out frgodsakes!!
KoshmarUK 4 months ago
I WAS THERE IT WAS AMAZING.
IOnlyDateDjzz 4 months ago
All the bands..Arthur Beatrice,Django Django and Metronomy were brilliant,the sound was awsome!!
woodmansared1 4 months ago
Fantastic surroundings, brilliant show and a banging crowd!!! I would imagine @KoshmarUK you were at a different gig to the rest of us!!!!
missdove65 4 months ago
@missdove65 Don't think so love - Metronomy were top rate but the others were shabby. Obviously your experience of gigs is thin to say the least, or you need to expand your musical taste
KoshmarUK 4 months ago
Thanks for upload Looks amazing, wish I was there. Anyone see Arthur Beatrice?
Isee6 4 months ago
@Isee6 yeah they were cr@p apart from the last two songs - obviously saved the "best" till last....
KoshmarUK 4 months ago
@KoshmarUK no! why u saying they were crap? come on man was great! :)
naan0905 4 months ago
@naan0905 Nope - sorry, mate, like I said, Metronomy were tip top. You must have noticed the massive abyss in difference of quality, songs and general musical ability, surely, when Metronomy finally got their arses on stage - 9.45 pm guys?? Please!! London on a weeknight is a 'mare when you have work to get to........
KoshmarUK 4 months ago
@KoshmarUK well, the first band was boring, to say the least. Felt like they were on stage because they HAD TO. Second one a bit more interesting but... yeah, 9.45 pm was too late, had to wake up at four so I kinda felt it!
naan0905 4 months ago