This is just an airplane. We have seen similar military designs of this like the Vought V-173/XF5U-1. Look up "Flying pancake". This design is not a new aircraft design other then athetically new design. But there is no new principles of flight here. A true UFO design would hover and have VLTO. search "Conada effect" and you will see many real UFO's aircraft on youtube!
That was an awesome video...but I have a question for you....have you ever seen a real UFO...you know from another world kind of UFO...do you even believe were being visited and have been for thousands of years? Well I just moved to this awesomely beautiful city in southern Utah, called St George and UFO's are alive and well here...don't believe me?...I filmed them and they are flashing rainbow colors..red, blue,yellow, green, and white, click on my moondawgee moniker under this box to see them.
All these ufo's and flying saucers are just technology..albeit more advanced than ours..if you want something done do it yourself! if u want that kind of technology you have to build it yourself. if thats not possible join together with a group of like minded individuals and pool resources.thats what me and a few friends are doing...check out my channel if you want to get involved! your governments are not going to do it for you, they to busy lying and robbing from you to even bother.
Back in the 50s, if you asked people what the year 2011 would look like, they would speak of flying cars. This seems to me to be the first step to building a flying car. I don't know how traffic control would work in the sky, but think of how much money would be saved not having to pave over miles and miles of farmland, or through mountainous terrain.
I am shocked though, that Aeronautical Engineers with massive testing budgets couldn't figure out what this fellow did in his spare time.
Yes, yes, yes - the new aircraft design of the future. It works! The next step is to get away from the internal combustion system of propulsion, which should have been replaced 50 years ago.
Nothing new here unfortunately. The air sees this as nothing more than a low aspect ratio wing. This does nothing to help the vortex situation. Blended wing body is also nothing new either. It's a nice model, but the coverage here is a bit misleading.
P.s All the politically correct f*ckers who are saying it's not a flying SAUCER...go get a life and stop trolling, seriously you're a waste of space and chances are it's a lot of space your wasting.
@lughcious Good for your grandad, stop name dropping and mention something you've done with your life, I'm not a space waster I have a job dickhead what do you have?
No, it wasn't good for him. He was gassed at least six times. Josef Mengele himself conducted horrible experiments on him and injected him with hormones from female chimpanzees and he grew hairy breasts forcing him to wear a bra ever since his liberation. You're an anti-Semite. I don't need a job like a goy servant.
@lughcious Anti-semite? Do you even know what that colaboration of words means? Your a fool to even let those words cross your brain, shit one for your grandad but my point is...your not him nor are we from the same waring generations...well not me anyway, I'm only 24, my dad wasn't even sperm back then let alone me being a singe cell...grow up and move on, people like you are stopping the progress of my generation.
@lughcious The more names you call me the more you emphasise my point dude, it's not the video games and porn that messed up the world if you had half of a brain you'd know it's money and the fact that it went from being valued and backed by gold to being a fiat currency worldwide (except in pre-revolutionary Libya which is now out the window) banks create money out of thin air, charge interest (that doesn't exist in circulation) and then put entire nations in debt (slavery) to the system.
@lughcious Yes...that and the fact that their "wealth" has bought off all the media outlets to push their agenda, funded socialogical projects to manipulate what is essentially just another animal, funded education (forced indoctrination" so on and so forth but the underlying reason is the monetary system...can you explain it any other way? If people are manipulated from birth to think a certain way they won't inquire about the alternative, it's not general human nature.
China invented fractional reserve banking and usury? Where did you hear that?
First you wrote that "people like you" (meaning I) are responsible for your generation's inability to progress. Then you said it is greedy Jew bankers and their paid-for media. Now the Chinese?
@lughcious People like you was refering to your attitude and childish name calling not that your a banker or a jew, stop being silly, China didn't invent fractional reserve banking but they did create the opening for it by creating a monetary system...if your the type of person who wants to be specific and politically correct I can play that game too but I'd rather talk to a human being than an automaton.
@doiremick86 wrote: "All the politically correct f*ckers", "you're a waste of space", "go get a life and stop trolling"
And you're whining about name calling?
The Rothschilds bros, the Lehman bros, the Schiff bros, the Warburg bros, - all Federal Reserve. You've already said "Yes", that greedy Jew bankers are responsible for your stagnation. Now you want to blame the Chinese? Take responsibility for yourself, space waster.
@lughcious Right fair enough then the first monetary system set up isn't responsible it's the people who took advantage of others' willingness to be involved in such a system...hence my agreement on the bankers comment, fuckers as a word is taken as a swear word and used as in insult but the way it's used has much diversity and it's origin means not a virgin, I'm Irish and by it I meant in a sense stuborn people and not as an insult...so if your going down the whole road of bringing up..cont...
@lughcious ...cont...previous comments and judging me as a wastle of space based upon them, who the fuck are you for calling me a wastle of space and telling me to go learn to fold towels AND have the limited capacity to use yourself as a reference and instead mention that your grandad was tortured by a regime I don't even support? No point getting all high and mighty just because you made me stumble over a few words of mine...your the real waste of space if that's how your going to be.
My grandpa wasn't gassed at least six times. I figured you would be sharp enough to figure out that wasn't serious. Forgive my miscalculation. In fact, there isn't a single verified gassing of anyone in the entirety of WWII. Zionist pity-myth dispelled.
@lughcious I gathered no-one could survive 6 gassings but would rather have acknowledged the intillectual side of your arguement in the hope it would go down that road rather than a silly point scoring exersice...god knows you would have said there was a leak in the chamber 5 times and was killed on the 6th.
@lughcious I'll answer that one question truthfully provided you don't try to goad me into a "holocoust is untrue to the extent it's being made out to be" arguement. No I don't believe him exposure to toxic gas kills first time around unless they only inhale 1ppm, which I doubt would happen in a gas chamber.
Regarding the Zionist pity-myth; Polish Jew $urvivor, Shlomo Dragon said he helped gas fellow Jews by dragging them to burn pits. Shlomo said "we could still hear moaning, especially when we grasped the bodies with our hands to drag them outside."
He didn't say whether or not he gave the moaners a head whacking, or if he burned them alive and conscious.
Do you believe Shlomo, and that German people gassed Jews, although there's not a single verified gassing of anyone in WWII?
And what's with the hundreds of survivers who said there were gassings. (Don't claim it would be only "jewish" claims or something. Communist, christian (jehovas witnesses) and Roma survivers also verified them)? - What's with all the corpses the nazis could not burn anymore when the allies arrived. - What's with all those nazis speaking proud of their *Work* in the Processes of Nürnberg? What's with the chambers STILL THERE?
@lughcious No a flying saucer means "Golly we're in a hollywood movie and that UFO in the sky looks like a flying saucer!!!" A tortion field propulsion system refers to a manipulation of gravity, to fly a circular wing or flying saucer or flying needle so on an so forth provided it's made with the material that can handle going into a vaccum at high velocity...hence why they haven't been created (for the public) yet.
Right @thoughtcontrol82 - Checked it out and the1933 Antes Annular Wing Monoplane Design (concept) is this same configuration. Nothing new under the sun.
Ephedra and Ephedrine diet pills are scientifically proven to melt fat and raise metabolism without diet or exercise.
Xenadrine RFA-1, Metabolife 356, Hydroxycut, Metabolift, and more.
HEAT ECA Stack will give you the strong stimulant effect of pharmaceutical grade diets. Contains also Cayenne Pepper, the secret ingredient Beyonce used for her role in "Dreamgirls." It is all natural and will not give you the side effects of the pharmaceutical ones. Click on my name below.
apart from the lifting body ring-design, and the interruption of vortices, i see nothing to indicate that it is anything but a conventional pusher plane.
you want a real revolution in flight technology?, look up OtisT Carr flying saucer technologies.
@Zoie3x8 Geobat is the first viable prop driven circular aircraft ever invented. Meaning it has the real potential of becoming a main stay in aviation, at the very least in a niche market. Geobat logic is a crowbar to conventional
aircraft design. The leading edge of the investment crowbar is now in place. Pressure is being applied and I am so, so grateful for all involved. Aerobat Aviation is on the winning side of this chess game.
@merlin5520355 Crowbar to conventional aircraft design? How? it has one fairly minor advantage in not having wingtip vortices, the structural advantage of making your fuselage a lifting body is already exploited in the Su-27 series to great effect. It's a neat design but seems to lack any real purpose beyond aesthetics.
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
This is old shit... I'm going to build a plane that's a cube and be like this guy..
No we need air crafts that has no need for wings or air lift so we can get out of this 21st century dark age of flight.
QuadCopters might be a air lift aircraft as well but i want to see one that ppl can pilot. Look at the Dragonfly models and make them life size that anybody can pilot.
Not to be rude, but I think he's missing the point of a "flying saucer". I mean tail fins and propellers?? He's definitely made a cool plane, but I just think he's missing the point.
Forget criticism I am highly confident that this invention will have an amazing potential applications and possibly green. That is, all your need is an extra helping hands of the professionals and fund to advance it further!
@dlobrown8888 Thanks, Yes-potential! I'm finally reaching that point where investor logic and engineering logic are starting to blend together. I personally see Geobat as a stepping stone to some really cool aerodynamic stuff but the beauty of what is happening is the Geobat aircraft as it now exists competes with conventional tech.
that will never work in a large scale unless you make the entire thing out of carbon fiber which would more than likely make it cost more than is worth.
@theapothem1 competitive conventional aerodynamics combined with super light airframes that the Geobat Geometry allows....... your observation is well understood on this end. The Aerodynamic puzzle logic game is unfolding.
If you remove the sides of the circle, you have a front and rear wing (& less weight). Wing tip vortex eliminators are available on 747s and C152s. Making the body part of the lift is harder, but it's been done with flying wings. Don't see the revolutionary part. Also creating a small model with model AC engine does not say much since physics is different and power/weight on the small motors is very high.
@tsbrownie Thanks for responding, The data and geometry of the design point to a something a bit different form conventional aerodynamics. You can rightfully say, "I'll believe it when I see it" . Stay tuned!
@RCPlaneFlyer16 I get this comment a lot. Besides the aerodynamic aspects of Geobat, which r very interesting, no 1 has ever fielded a reasonably efficient circular aircraft. Assume you are a scientist working on an aircraft project which relates to electromagnetic fields that requires a perfectly circular geometry for said tech to unfold. Magnetic fields love circles. The invention is promising but useless, Tubes and wings wont work. Geobat is a stepping stone to some really cool tech.
@merlin5520355 I can't wait to see what we come out within the next 20 years i was amazed when my dad told me that he saw a coca cola semi FULLY electric he said he couldnt even hear it i was amazed to think that if we mass produce this. Im only 15 and i just love seeing what we can do with nowadays technology
@merlin5520355 That is definitely true. Ive personally seen some extremely interesting aircraft which seemingly do not operate by conventional means. Theres definitely some ridiculously advanced tech that the government has. But one thing is certain..the Geobat is revolutionary none the less.
@MechaGodzilla2001 Thanks very much,.. Cheer Leaders are welcome and the negative stuff is welcome too, especially if it's based on logic. This Discovery Channel vid. has been a gold mine of feedback and info. google Aerobat Aviation Inc. to see the players, Flying Saucers are Coming! How this plays out over time is going to be very interesting. Investor relations are unfolding as of this writing. I'm very impressed with Aerobat Avi. Inc. with regard to their contacts.
Obviously the military has things that are far more advanced. Not that the design for this craft isnt anything short of brilliant. But the military and other secret organizations have the smartest people in the world working for them, and theyve had flying saucers since ww2, so i can guarantee you that what they have now is obviously extremely advanced.
@BryceHunterTV Your comment is perceptive, I tend to think that the US has not created a classic VTOL high performance aircraft. The flip side is the military is just playing around with some advanced tech to figure out how to make it useful, When VTOL with performance comes on line u can kiss tubes and wings goodbye but maybe Geobat has a real future should this happen. It's going to be hard to deviate from tube and wing logistics and investments. Geobat may be a transition aircraft.
Quick Question if all the rudders are independent of each other what happens if one fails. Is there a fail safe to prevent a spiraling. The public is very sensitive to accidents. Remember the Hindenburg. If it didn't crash on camera we might all being flying in Zeppelins.
@YoHappyGilmour Geobat is unusually stable. The control surfaces you see are only the first draft. There are numerous variations that relate to mission. True story... One of my best friends flew his standard RC tractor prop (aprox same engines) craft directly into the center nose of Geobat, amazing coincidence to behold! His plane disintegrated. The Geobat lost a large chunk of the right wing, crushed nose, dead prop, all electronics intact. I simply glided down for a landing. Redundancy=A10+
@hellomynameis151 I often wonder how many artist throughout history inspired an engineer to build an invention. Start with the renaissance and march forward. I mark this general era as a breaking point in the history of logical ideas, starts to deviate from fantasy and religious dogma. Imagine being locked up for telling everyone what your brilliant mind has reduced to truth-Galileo. You see it with your own eyes, you understand the math, your mind is logically beyond conventional thought.
A Great concept of a aircraft incorperating a unquie yet aerodynamic geometric structure. The concept of this aircraft is mainly the aspect of it's ring like shape obtaing a suitable flight which provides the craft with stability. As far as propulsion there is the conventional princible of applying wind generated by propeller fans.
@animalnt Thanks for info, I heard this was happening but I don't have any links or pics of the offending Geobat product. Could you direct me to a website to find the toy you bought? Thanks!
I want to fly the full scale version this is amazing and I knew there was somthing to the areodynamics of a frisby, really I want to build this it could probably be a good kit plane, this thing will be the best looking aircraft out there, I've spent countless hours looking at aircraft and this one has really got my attention, many design possibilites with this break through, don't forget as well about the ultralight market you should really be able to make one under 250lbs, with a 5 gallon tank
That is the start of something novel...stay with it. Everything had humble beginnings. Patent the design or the US Gov't will steal it from you and use it with no compensation for your efforts. That is their way.
@AlabamaSoldier Theft is theft Einstein, whether you have a patent or not. Learn some law before you start babbling about things you have no comprehension of. If you had understood the post, you would see that I told him to patent it. Apparently you haven't had many dealings with our illustrious government. You will as you grow up, son. And spend some more time on your comprehension...it lacks
I love it that we live in a capitalist society and people are free to dream, imagine and invent such incredible things. I fear that if the US keeps moving toward socialism, that the desire and drive to invent and stand out from the collective, will some day be gone.
I'm watching this vid four years after it was posted and seeing no rather films of it I think it's safe to assume that a R C model is all this will ever be.
@carcano38 I feel your pain, developments are now underway for toys an UAVS. FYI..get used to calling UAVs RPVs. It relates to the psychology of how the public conceives the phrase Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. The investors have high hopes for Geobat, they have an intimate knowledge of the challenges of full scale with regard to marketing.
@congoMEGA Not yet, Geobat is just an airplane for now, but the flying circle will get your mind reeling on the possibilities. First things first, just get the plane into a fullscale application.
Not impressed at all! Still crap ass explosion based technology pushing a modified plane, nothing new here.
Schauberger produced implosion turbines which powered the German Saucers built in the 30's and 40's. Now that was impressive! Our military already has his technology, so these ideas are not remotely relative to anything but the idiots who believe in the bagel guys and their television mind control garbage, which is of course 100 years behind Tesla, Schauberger and Walter Rusell!
@77GSlinger Would you please direct me to where i can see the technology you speak of. I'm trying to make saucer shaped flight a reality. It starts with aerodynamics and moves into exotic geometry, but first we need to create a flying circle that brighter minds can engage. Time will tell.
@merlin5520355 I would suggest Callum Coats many books on Viktor Schauberger. See: Especially "Energy Evolution" from the eco-technology series and "Living Energies". This will take all of your efforts to new heights. I wish you the best, so you may produce something of great value for humanity!
why not take this design and add to it a cockpit in the center with a rotating chassis around with jet-motor surrounding 360 degrees around the cockpit to gain a frisbee effect. then having a on/off function for the jet-engines as they turn around so that it would drive in a wanted direction????
@mice1m1 I'm trying, logic rules and I find it very difficult to let this idea flounder. Some really bright minds have dissected Geobat and it still remains anomalous. There is something we all are seeing that we don't understand. Fluid Dynamics don't match comp. analysis! Welcome to my universe!
The truth has now been revealed, my professional A team of covert US agents has now been exposed! .... Hello all, wake up! Geobat is new to aerodynamics. I've stolen nothing from anyone but the aerodynamics speak for themselves. Having said all this, Geobat rides upon all conventional aerodynamics and then some. It's the latter part of my words which is puzzling to all working on Geobat now.
This looks like an interesting concept, well done in getting this done in to a UAV. Is there any plans to compete with the full size aircraft kit market so we can see its perfomance when flown by a pilot. It looks like if it scales well, may well pull into higher G than a human can take which may have to be limited somehow.
@speedyg2012 Full scale is my main goal, all scale work indicates a highly robust aircraft with regard to G forces. The pilot is now the limiting factor based on extrapolation. There are significant control surface variations that are proprietary. I'll worry about G forces when Geobat starts to show up at your local airport. Yes, this concept scales well, but it's at the cutting edge of design and efficiency, how this geometry plays out through time will be interesting for all.
@TheMick5429 Thanks, be sure to see the video responses, a new Corp. intently is now developing Geobat into a UAV. Events are finally starting to click.
@fohtynine I've come to terms with what I'm trying to accomplish. How this plays out will be very interesting. The geometry of Geobat and it's efficiency are 2 forces that will logically play out as time moves on....Thanks, I'm always marveled a bit in that such a simple Geometry can challenge conventional thinking.
@merlin5520355 Your response is is exactly what we are all seeing on this end. The concept of a perfectly circular flying craft changes the playing field of aerodynamics. Aerobat Aviation inc, is actively driving the Geobat aerodynamic hammer. Google Aerobat Aviation Inc, to see the players. Flying saucers are coming,
how this comes into reality will be very interesting.
@bubblerings The UFO Hunters on the history channel have already been fooled by Geobat with lights. Expect more of this. Lasers? Good idea if they show up in video. I'm guessing that kind of energy is not cheap.
@bubblerings I'm talking about things here I don't fully understand. A simple laser will not be seen unless there is atmospheric smoke. My creative mind and my contacts have already pondered the equation. Conclusion, an impressive visual display is possible.
This is nothing more than a round airplane with traditional air-lift characteristics, and propulsion, not a true flying saucer as described by UFO witnesses.
@CaneFu I understand your observation, UFOs as we understand them are way beyond Geobat. However, think of Geobat as the beginning of an airframe that will lead to new expressions in aerodynamics.
It is not anything like a saucer, I't just a propeller powered plane with circle wings and a good arodynamic fuselodge it does not repel gravity like a saucer
@thebteam300 An efficient flying circle has never been realized until now. Tubes and wings now have competition. New technology will naturally be integrated using the dominate force of the ring. Rings rule in the field of structures and electromagnetics. Geobat represents the beginning of a new way of aerodynamic thinking.
So? it's still a wing shape, getting lift in the same way as any other aircraft. It's more like just disguising the traditional aircraft shape while pretending that it's some kind of saucer.
I've seen tunnel wings that are more truly revolutionary, that can actually hover and are very maneuverable. But they are really different, unlike this effort to disguise a plane with wings into a "saucer" shape.
@airtech4 Geobat achieves lift in a slightly different way than conventional wings. Proprietary. The saucer aspect is just the beginning of the concept. Tunnel wings? Can you direct me further, I know of no efficient VTOL except for military applications as in thrust downward which are very fuel inefficient, dual tilt rotor is still trying to make into the commercial market.
@merlin5520355 I don't have a link to any information about the round wings, but I had a friend who worked on the first prototypes. The last I heard they were working in Australia on a drone vehicle. it works the same as a conventional wing in that they create lift by a negative pressure on the top (or inside) portion of the wing, but they use the engines to blow air over the lifting surface, so they can get a negative pressure for lift, without having to go forward. So hovering is possible.
Yes, I've actually looked into this aspect with regards to RC and some of the concepts out there. It makes a lot of sense from a structural view point. i hope to try this at some point in the future. Imagine being at an indoor football game and this RC Geobat thing is performing slow motion aerobatics.
My intent was not to make it look esthetically beautiful, that's just the nature of everything I create. Geobat flies exceptionally well and is definitely in the ballpark of efficiency per the data we now have.
I gave up on the big boys years ago. From my stand point their corporate minds are wedded to tubes and wings. This is going to take new thinking in aviation. I'm putting Payload = money over Lift and Drag. Structural integrity, flight characteristics and mission is also an important factor. Remember the Burnelli concept, great idea, they all ignored him and we still fly in missiles with wings. Speed is not that important important anymore. MIT came up with the Double Bubble design.
Correction, they attempted to build saucer aircraft in the 30-50's. CG with regard to forward flight was the main reason they all failed. VTOL is one thing, makeing a disk behave in forward flight is another.
U can not prove your statement. There is not 1 piece of documented evidence that shows saucers were operational "made by man" during WW2, however, it does appear the US military later created very large saucers but had stability problems and scrapped the whole idea. Stability! That's why the NRL visited me. If you know of such evidence please enlighten me. They might exist today given the aerodynamic hurdle has been bypassed, saucers have terrible flight characteristics. Geobat not included.
@JustSomeGuyOk You appear to be confusing belief with evidence. I live in the land of logic and reason. Lack of evidence is proof? You can't show me because it doesn't exist!
@JustSomeGuyOk you started this post, I'm simply responding to you. Using profanity and insults reflect upon your character, all you have to do is stop posting. If you know you are right, enjoy your superior intellect.
@merlin5520355 1st anti-gravity saucers were operational in "1925" the solidified anti-gravity theory existed as far back as the late 19th century,as did the theory of "ColdFusion" where in the hell did u think "jules verne" and "H.G Wells" two 19th century novelists got their ideas from???,the Sci-Fi channel,both of them were good buddies with "Mr.Tesla" and "Mr.Keely".your documented evidence is nothing more than government propaganda. see "J.Pharrel". nazi 3rd reich had 1st "A.G saucer.
@myleftnutts America: the XF5U and the Nazi Project you stated, were both solid saucers, but the real porblem with their shape was high-turbulence levels, the XF5U had propellers on the outer edge of the saucer to eliminate that problem, the nazi was a jet/rocket project and therefor did not have the advantage the props had over the turbulence levels. both projects were canceled: 1(Nazi) by the end of WW2, the other(American) because the navy was too dang stupid and too dang greedy for jets
Thanks, imagination and logic combined with how doable is this in my lifetime. Let me show you the world through my eyes, Depeche Mode. If you are so interested I will send you a new demo for investors, contact me directly thru geobat....com
Thanks, creating a viable flying circle, even after you have demonstrated it is not as straight forward as one might think. Wish me luck! Logic rules, and that is what drives me.
so what if this isnt a real flying saucer? we can't just take a huge step from what we have now to real flying saucers. the point is that we've made something better and more efficient than conventional airplanes. maybe this design will be modified and it will be even better! id love to see real airplanes like this someday.
Thank you very much, the phrase "Real Flying Saucers" was meant to catch your attention. It's very understandable that others are a bit disappointed, it "is" just an airplane but it's a geometry that allows for new thinking in aerodynamics to unfold. i too would like to crawl into a craft capable of hovering, mach 12 speeds, and fantastic maneuvers. Geobat represents something new to aviation, time will tell, practice your patience and lets see how far this concept penetrates the market.
@ganjahyute1 why? you do realize every passenger plane you ride in is propelled by, ready for this? A turbojet powered propeller also called a FAN. 8^) When you learn something about aviation let the world know.
Ok, your response is understandable. I and others see solutions you don't see. Have you ever lost a chess game when you thought you were going to win. I understand everything you are relating. I'm a very small determined entity within the vast world of aerospace but much brighter minds than mine see something in Geobat we don't understand. Time will tell, but present developments look promising. What really drives me nuts is that I can't tell anybody what's going on.
As President Clinton said, I feel your pain. What you don't realize is to get a perfectly circular craft to fly predictably and stable with only a propeller is a historical achievement. However, the challenge is to advance it to the level that it competes with general aviation. They said at the time the Write Brothers were dumb. And in a sense they were, they got caught up in patent issues. I see the bigger picture.
@merlin5520355 They will not have to lie no more .lol For they will see flying saucer.They did say that about the Write Brothers.We can do wonders if we try.We are in the image. Now we know .But in the image of what?
All the Negative Posters.......You might want to talk to the 'United States Department Of Defense" Cause they are interested!!!! On April 26 1998, three Naval Research Laboratory engineers arrived at the inventors home to verify the Geobat concept. (The Naval Research Laboratory is located in Washington D.C. and is a branch of the Department of Defense. They develop new ideas and technologies for military applications.).
Good design but the concept will not make it to the commercial aeroplane companies, it will go straight to the USA defence laboratories which will fix a machine gun as a payload and churn thousands of them to kill millions around the world in the name of the so called 'war-against-terror'. The inventor was better off with not realising his childhood dream cz the pentagon now has a dangerous toy.
This is just an airplane. We have seen similar military designs of this like the Vought V-173/XF5U-1. Look up "Flying pancake". This design is not a new aircraft design other then athetically new design. But there is no new principles of flight here. A true UFO design would hover and have VLTO. search "Conada effect" and you will see many real UFO's aircraft on youtube!
elinikk 3 months ago
@elinikk sorry that's "Coanda effect"!
elinikk 3 months ago
Put some points on opposite sides and you have a flying wing. It's been done.
gregrutz 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That was an awesome video...but I have a question for you....have you ever seen a real UFO...you know from another world kind of UFO...do you even believe were being visited and have been for thousands of years? Well I just moved to this awesomely beautiful city in southern Utah, called St George and UFO's are alive and well here...don't believe me?...I filmed them and they are flashing rainbow colors..red, blue,yellow, green, and white, click on my moondawgee moniker under this box to see them.
moondawgee 3 months ago
You better start learning german => ironsky.net
LordGnaaa 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All these ufo's and flying saucers are just technology..albeit more advanced than ours..if you want something done do it yourself! if u want that kind of technology you have to build it yourself. if thats not possible join together with a group of like minded individuals and pool resources.thats what me and a few friends are doing...check out my channel if you want to get involved! your governments are not going to do it for you, they to busy lying and robbing from you to even bother.
MsAmagama 3 months ago
i hope i'll still be alive!
TheWitchyGuy 4 months ago
if he only ?Knew SKUNK~Works
rclark23 4 months ago
@rclark23 I'm well aware of what you talk of. Straight line technology now has a competitor.
merlin5520355 4 months ago
Back in the 50s, if you asked people what the year 2011 would look like, they would speak of flying cars. This seems to me to be the first step to building a flying car. I don't know how traffic control would work in the sky, but think of how much money would be saved not having to pave over miles and miles of farmland, or through mountainous terrain.
I am shocked though, that Aeronautical Engineers with massive testing budgets couldn't figure out what this fellow did in his spare time.
JohnWesleyMethodism 4 months ago
It's nothing but a ROUND airplane! Exactly what the Nazis built!
JeffSal999 4 months ago
I'm sure the Chinese will be looking at this with interest.
Nibiru128 4 months ago
Yes, yes, yes - the new aircraft design of the future. It works! The next step is to get away from the internal combustion system of propulsion, which should have been replaced 50 years ago.
dawes777 4 months ago
Nothing new here unfortunately. The air sees this as nothing more than a low aspect ratio wing. This does nothing to help the vortex situation. Blended wing body is also nothing new either. It's a nice model, but the coverage here is a bit misleading.
tj256 4 months ago
Congrats on the design very well thought up.
P.s All the politically correct f*ckers who are saying it's not a flying SAUCER...go get a life and stop trolling, seriously you're a waste of space and chances are it's a lot of space your wasting.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86 You get a life, space waster. Learn to swim or fold towels or something. My grandpa was in Auschwitz.
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious Good for your grandad, stop name dropping and mention something you've done with your life, I'm not a space waster I have a job dickhead what do you have?
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
No, it wasn't good for him. He was gassed at least six times. Josef Mengele himself conducted horrible experiments on him and injected him with hormones from female chimpanzees and he grew hairy breasts forcing him to wear a bra ever since his liberation. You're an anti-Semite. I don't need a job like a goy servant.
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious Anti-semite? Do you even know what that colaboration of words means? Your a fool to even let those words cross your brain, shit one for your grandad but my point is...your not him nor are we from the same waring generations...well not me anyway, I'm only 24, my dad wasn't even sperm back then let alone me being a singe cell...grow up and move on, people like you are stopping the progress of my generation.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
Video games and unlimited online pornography arrested your generation's "progress" before it grew out of puberty, space waster.
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious The more names you call me the more you emphasise my point dude, it's not the video games and porn that messed up the world if you had half of a brain you'd know it's money and the fact that it went from being valued and backed by gold to being a fiat currency worldwide (except in pre-revolutionary Libya which is now out the window) banks create money out of thin air, charge interest (that doesn't exist in circulation) and then put entire nations in debt (slavery) to the system.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
Greedy Jew bankers such as the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Lehmans and Schiffs are to blame for your generation's arrested development?
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious Yes...that and the fact that their "wealth" has bought off all the media outlets to push their agenda, funded socialogical projects to manipulate what is essentially just another animal, funded education (forced indoctrination" so on and so forth but the underlying reason is the monetary system...can you explain it any other way? If people are manipulated from birth to think a certain way they won't inquire about the alternative, it's not general human nature.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
Then, Jews of the Synagogue of Satan are responsible for your generation's arrested development. Agreed?
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious No, China invented the monetary system. What have you got against the Jews? You've mentioned them in every comment yet I haven't.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
China invented fractional reserve banking and usury? Where did you hear that?
First you wrote that "people like you" (meaning I) are responsible for your generation's inability to progress. Then you said it is greedy Jew bankers and their paid-for media. Now the Chinese?
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious People like you was refering to your attitude and childish name calling not that your a banker or a jew, stop being silly, China didn't invent fractional reserve banking but they did create the opening for it by creating a monetary system...if your the type of person who wants to be specific and politically correct I can play that game too but I'd rather talk to a human being than an automaton.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86 wrote: "All the politically correct f*ckers", "you're a waste of space", "go get a life and stop trolling"
And you're whining about name calling?
The Rothschilds bros, the Lehman bros, the Schiff bros, the Warburg bros, - all Federal Reserve. You've already said "Yes", that greedy Jew bankers are responsible for your stagnation. Now you want to blame the Chinese? Take responsibility for yourself, space waster.
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious Right fair enough then the first monetary system set up isn't responsible it's the people who took advantage of others' willingness to be involved in such a system...hence my agreement on the bankers comment, fuckers as a word is taken as a swear word and used as in insult but the way it's used has much diversity and it's origin means not a virgin, I'm Irish and by it I meant in a sense stuborn people and not as an insult...so if your going down the whole road of bringing up..cont...
doiremick86 4 months ago
@lughcious ...cont...previous comments and judging me as a wastle of space based upon them, who the fuck are you for calling me a wastle of space and telling me to go learn to fold towels AND have the limited capacity to use yourself as a reference and instead mention that your grandad was tortured by a regime I don't even support? No point getting all high and mighty just because you made me stumble over a few words of mine...your the real waste of space if that's how your going to be.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
My grandpa wasn't gassed at least six times. I figured you would be sharp enough to figure out that wasn't serious. Forgive my miscalculation. In fact, there isn't a single verified gassing of anyone in the entirety of WWII. Zionist pity-myth dispelled.
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious I gathered no-one could survive 6 gassings but would rather have acknowledged the intillectual side of your arguement in the hope it would go down that road rather than a silly point scoring exersice...god knows you would have said there was a leak in the chamber 5 times and was killed on the 6th.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
Polish Jew $urvivor, Moshe Peer said he was gassed at least six times. Do you believe him?
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious I'll answer that one question truthfully provided you don't try to goad me into a "holocoust is untrue to the extent it's being made out to be" arguement. No I don't believe him exposure to toxic gas kills first time around unless they only inhale 1ppm, which I doubt would happen in a gas chamber.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
Regarding the Zionist pity-myth; Polish Jew $urvivor, Shlomo Dragon said he helped gas fellow Jews by dragging them to burn pits. Shlomo said "we could still hear moaning, especially when we grasped the bodies with our hands to drag them outside."
He didn't say whether or not he gave the moaners a head whacking, or if he burned them alive and conscious.
Do you believe Shlomo, and that German people gassed Jews, although there's not a single verified gassing of anyone in WWII?
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious Not verified ... WHAT O_O ?
And what's with the hundreds of survivers who said there were gassings. (Don't claim it would be only "jewish" claims or something. Communist, christian (jehovas witnesses) and Roma survivers also verified them)? - What's with all the corpses the nazis could not burn anymore when the allies arrived. - What's with all those nazis speaking proud of their *Work* in the Processes of Nürnberg? What's with the chambers STILL THERE?
So Fuck off, you nazi basard!
jerome96114 2 weeks ago
@doiremick86
By the way, flying saucer refers to a manipulation of gravity, not a propeller pushing a circular wing through the air to generate lift.
lughcious 4 months ago
@lughcious No a flying saucer means "Golly we're in a hollywood movie and that UFO in the sky looks like a flying saucer!!!" A tortion field propulsion system refers to a manipulation of gravity, to fly a circular wing or flying saucer or flying needle so on an so forth provided it's made with the material that can handle going into a vaccum at high velocity...hence why they haven't been created (for the public) yet.
doiremick86 4 months ago
@doiremick86
A flying saucer refers to a craft that manipulates gravity. Aeroplanes and helicopters manipulate air to overcome gravity.
You can pretend that a flying saucer is whatever you say it is, but that only works for you.
lughcious 4 months ago
this is not a FLYING SAUCER-
BOGZASV8MA 4 months ago
Right @BOGZASV8MA - We know the difference between Flying Saucer and gas/oil burning model fixed wing aeroplane.
lughcious 4 months ago
hey smart guy, you don't see the government filling the sky with chemtrails?
cdimmm 4 months ago
Not that original a design. This is essentially a streamlined version of the Lee-Richards Annular Monoplane of 1913.
thoughtcontrol82 4 months ago
Right @thoughtcontrol82 - Checked it out and the1933 Antes Annular Wing Monoplane Design (concept) is this same configuration. Nothing new under the sun.
lughcious 4 months ago
Ephedra and Ephedrine diet pills are scientifically proven to melt fat and raise metabolism without diet or exercise.
Xenadrine RFA-1, Metabolife 356, Hydroxycut, Metabolift, and more.
HEAT ECA Stack will give you the strong stimulant effect of pharmaceutical grade diets. Contains also Cayenne Pepper, the secret ingredient Beyonce used for her role in "Dreamgirls." It is all natural and will not give you the side effects of the pharmaceutical ones. Click on my name below.
ephedradiet 4 months ago
What good is a flying saucer without the anal probing ???
nsofast 5 months ago
apart from the lifting body ring-design, and the interruption of vortices, i see nothing to indicate that it is anything but a conventional pusher plane.
you want a real revolution in flight technology?, look up OtisT Carr flying saucer technologies.
Zoie3x8 5 months ago
@Zoie3x8 Geobat is the first viable prop driven circular aircraft ever invented. Meaning it has the real potential of becoming a main stay in aviation, at the very least in a niche market. Geobat logic is a crowbar to conventional
aircraft design. The leading edge of the investment crowbar is now in place. Pressure is being applied and I am so, so grateful for all involved. Aerobat Aviation is on the winning side of this chess game.
merlin5520355 5 months ago
@merlin5520355 Crowbar to conventional aircraft design? How? it has one fairly minor advantage in not having wingtip vortices, the structural advantage of making your fuselage a lifting body is already exploited in the Su-27 series to great effect. It's a neat design but seems to lack any real purpose beyond aesthetics.
AmurTiger 4 months ago
@Zoie3x8 What about the TR3-B?
lostinthemix 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are a truth seeker, search "Truth Contest" in Google and click on the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says. Everyone needs to see this. The Present will turn this world right-side up if it reaches enough people. You will see what I mean when you read the first page.
SeekTruthN0w 5 months ago
why the two vertical stabilizers? Can you do it with just one?
DoctorMaxMoebius 5 months ago
This is old shit... I'm going to build a plane that's a cube and be like this guy..
No we need air crafts that has no need for wings or air lift so we can get out of this 21st century dark age of flight.
QuadCopters might be a air lift aircraft as well but i want to see one that ppl can pilot. Look at the Dragonfly models and make them life size that anybody can pilot.
dauransx 5 months ago
Not to be rude, but I think he's missing the point of a "flying saucer". I mean tail fins and propellers?? He's definitely made a cool plane, but I just think he's missing the point.
blacklanternz 5 months ago
Forget criticism I am highly confident that this invention will have an amazing potential applications and possibly green. That is, all your need is an extra helping hands of the professionals and fund to advance it further!
dlobrown8888 5 months ago
@dlobrown8888 Thanks, Yes-potential! I'm finally reaching that point where investor logic and engineering logic are starting to blend together. I personally see Geobat as a stepping stone to some really cool aerodynamic stuff but the beauty of what is happening is the Geobat aircraft as it now exists competes with conventional tech.
merlin5520355 5 months ago
that will never work in a large scale unless you make the entire thing out of carbon fiber which would more than likely make it cost more than is worth.
theapothem1 5 months ago
@theapothem1 competitive conventional aerodynamics combined with super light airframes that the Geobat Geometry allows....... your observation is well understood on this end. The Aerodynamic puzzle logic game is unfolding.
merlin5520355 5 months ago
@theapothem1 Not necessarily,,it will depend on what kind of propulsion system they will choose to use,,,
alboclev 5 months ago
If you remove the sides of the circle, you have a front and rear wing (& less weight). Wing tip vortex eliminators are available on 747s and C152s. Making the body part of the lift is harder, but it's been done with flying wings. Don't see the revolutionary part. Also creating a small model with model AC engine does not say much since physics is different and power/weight on the small motors is very high.
tsbrownie 5 months ago
@tsbrownie Thanks for responding, The data and geometry of the design point to a something a bit different form conventional aerodynamics. You can rightfully say, "I'll believe it when I see it" . Stay tuned!
merlin5520355 5 months ago
Whats the point. This is just a round plane. Like Canefu said.
RCPlaneFlyer16 6 months ago
@RCPlaneFlyer16 I get this comment a lot. Besides the aerodynamic aspects of Geobat, which r very interesting, no 1 has ever fielded a reasonably efficient circular aircraft. Assume you are a scientist working on an aircraft project which relates to electromagnetic fields that requires a perfectly circular geometry for said tech to unfold. Magnetic fields love circles. The invention is promising but useless, Tubes and wings wont work. Geobat is a stepping stone to some really cool tech.
merlin5520355 6 months ago
@merlin5520355 I never thought of it that way. Someday hopefully.
RCPlaneFlyer16 6 months ago
@merlin5520355 I can't wait to see what we come out within the next 20 years i was amazed when my dad told me that he saw a coca cola semi FULLY electric he said he couldnt even hear it i was amazed to think that if we mass produce this. Im only 15 and i just love seeing what we can do with nowadays technology
rockstarmaniac717 6 months ago
@merlin5520355 what about the coanda effect
johny260 6 months ago
@merlin5520355 That is definitely true. Ive personally seen some extremely interesting aircraft which seemingly do not operate by conventional means. Theres definitely some ridiculously advanced tech that the government has. But one thing is certain..the Geobat is revolutionary none the less.
BryceHunterTV 6 months ago
That's awesome!!!
MechaGodzilla2001 6 months ago
@MechaGodzilla2001 Thanks very much,.. Cheer Leaders are welcome and the negative stuff is welcome too, especially if it's based on logic. This Discovery Channel vid. has been a gold mine of feedback and info. google Aerobat Aviation Inc. to see the players, Flying Saucers are Coming! How this plays out over time is going to be very interesting. Investor relations are unfolding as of this writing. I'm very impressed with Aerobat Avi. Inc. with regard to their contacts.
merlin5520355 6 months ago
Obviously the military has things that are far more advanced. Not that the design for this craft isnt anything short of brilliant. But the military and other secret organizations have the smartest people in the world working for them, and theyve had flying saucers since ww2, so i can guarantee you that what they have now is obviously extremely advanced.
BryceHunterTV 6 months ago
@BryceHunterTV Your comment is perceptive, I tend to think that the US has not created a classic VTOL high performance aircraft. The flip side is the military is just playing around with some advanced tech to figure out how to make it useful, When VTOL with performance comes on line u can kiss tubes and wings goodbye but maybe Geobat has a real future should this happen. It's going to be hard to deviate from tube and wing logistics and investments. Geobat may be a transition aircraft.
merlin5520355 6 months ago
Quick Question if all the rudders are independent of each other what happens if one fails. Is there a fail safe to prevent a spiraling. The public is very sensitive to accidents. Remember the Hindenburg. If it didn't crash on camera we might all being flying in Zeppelins.
YoHappyGilmour 6 months ago
@YoHappyGilmour Geobat is unusually stable. The control surfaces you see are only the first draft. There are numerous variations that relate to mission. True story... One of my best friends flew his standard RC tractor prop (aprox same engines) craft directly into the center nose of Geobat, amazing coincidence to behold! His plane disintegrated. The Geobat lost a large chunk of the right wing, crushed nose, dead prop, all electronics intact. I simply glided down for a landing. Redundancy=A10+
merlin5520355 6 months ago
Having to get a Pilots license should weed out the Idiots.
yahreet 6 months ago
You can buy one of these and other full size plans off future horizons.net
Good website.
666tubegod 7 months ago
dont we have drones like these in the military???
theoncegreatsean 7 months ago
@theoncegreatsean Not yet, but Aerobat Aviation Inc. is working on it big time. Excellent contacts are unfolding! Logic rules the day!
merlin5520355 6 months ago
@merlin5520355 ..........Art and Compassion rule tomorrow
hellomynameis151 6 months ago
@hellomynameis151 I often wonder how many artist throughout history inspired an engineer to build an invention. Start with the renaissance and march forward. I mark this general era as a breaking point in the history of logical ideas, starts to deviate from fantasy and religious dogma. Imagine being locked up for telling everyone what your brilliant mind has reduced to truth-Galileo. You see it with your own eyes, you understand the math, your mind is logically beyond conventional thought.
merlin5520355 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my page to see a new design for propulsion!!!
Innateengineer 7 months ago
The revolution of this craft is it's unquie geometric structure of shape which provides stable flight
information20 7 months ago
A Great concept of a aircraft incorperating a unquie yet aerodynamic geometric structure. The concept of this aircraft is mainly the aspect of it's ring like shape obtaing a suitable flight which provides the craft with stability. As far as propulsion there is the conventional princible of applying wind generated by propeller fans.
information20 7 months ago
i got on one of these in hong kong airport, i think the copyright laws over there was criminal
animalnt 8 months ago
@animalnt Thanks for info, I heard this was happening but I don't have any links or pics of the offending Geobat product. Could you direct me to a website to find the toy you bought? Thanks!
merlin5520355 8 months ago
It's just a fucking stealth bomber with a ring around the back. The end!
f1nal0ne34 8 months ago
I want to fly the full scale version this is amazing and I knew there was somthing to the areodynamics of a frisby, really I want to build this it could probably be a good kit plane, this thing will be the best looking aircraft out there, I've spent countless hours looking at aircraft and this one has really got my attention, many design possibilites with this break through, don't forget as well about the ultralight market you should really be able to make one under 250lbs, with a 5 gallon tank
sbbowen 8 months ago
That is the start of something novel...stay with it. Everything had humble beginnings. Patent the design or the US Gov't will steal it from you and use it with no compensation for your efforts. That is their way.
onepoundpull 8 months ago
@onepoundpull If you don't have a patent, it's not considered stealing. That's the whole point behind the concept of a patent.
Geez, finish school, dude.
AlabamaSoldier 7 months ago
@AlabamaSoldier Theft is theft Einstein, whether you have a patent or not. Learn some law before you start babbling about things you have no comprehension of. If you had understood the post, you would see that I told him to patent it. Apparently you haven't had many dealings with our illustrious government. You will as you grow up, son. And spend some more time on your comprehension...it lacks
onepoundpull 6 months ago
I love it that we live in a capitalist society and people are free to dream, imagine and invent such incredible things. I fear that if the US keeps moving toward socialism, that the desire and drive to invent and stand out from the collective, will some day be gone.
UsMaLeMan1 8 months ago
such concepts are known in since at least 20 years :)
several prototypes worked well with other kind of drive :)
and it was not air blowing propellers :)
greetings :)
4RadeK 8 months ago
wow that is a badass design!!! you should get an agent to get your plane design used in a movie - THAT would promote it.
Madkre8tor 8 months ago
you gotta start somewhere, keep pushing the bar
congoMEGA 8 months ago
I'm watching this vid four years after it was posted and seeing no rather films of it I think it's safe to assume that a R C model is all this will ever be.
carcano38 8 months ago
@carcano38 I feel your pain, developments are now underway for toys an UAVS. FYI..get used to calling UAVs RPVs. It relates to the psychology of how the public conceives the phrase Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. The investors have high hopes for Geobat, they have an intimate knowledge of the challenges of full scale with regard to marketing.
merlin5520355 8 months ago
no magnetics?
congoMEGA 9 months ago
@congoMEGA Not yet, Geobat is just an airplane for now, but the flying circle will get your mind reeling on the possibilities. First things first, just get the plane into a fullscale application.
merlin5520355 8 months ago
Not impressed at all! Still crap ass explosion based technology pushing a modified plane, nothing new here.
Schauberger produced implosion turbines which powered the German Saucers built in the 30's and 40's. Now that was impressive! Our military already has his technology, so these ideas are not remotely relative to anything but the idiots who believe in the bagel guys and their television mind control garbage, which is of course 100 years behind Tesla, Schauberger and Walter Rusell!
77GSlinger 9 months ago
@77GSlinger Would you please direct me to where i can see the technology you speak of. I'm trying to make saucer shaped flight a reality. It starts with aerodynamics and moves into exotic geometry, but first we need to create a flying circle that brighter minds can engage. Time will tell.
merlin5520355 9 months ago
@merlin5520355 I would suggest Callum Coats many books on Viktor Schauberger. See: Especially "Energy Evolution" from the eco-technology series and "Living Energies". This will take all of your efforts to new heights. I wish you the best, so you may produce something of great value for humanity!
77GSlinger 9 months ago
I knew a kid that built something like that as a science fair project.
SubliminalKarate 9 months ago
why not take this design and add to it a cockpit in the center with a rotating chassis around with jet-motor surrounding 360 degrees around the cockpit to gain a frisbee effect. then having a on/off function for the jet-engines as they turn around so that it would drive in a wanted direction????
Steffmeister86 9 months ago
GROW UP.........
mice1m1 9 months ago
@mice1m1 I'm trying, logic rules and I find it very difficult to let this idea flounder. Some really bright minds have dissected Geobat and it still remains anomalous. There is something we all are seeing that we don't understand. Fluid Dynamics don't match comp. analysis! Welcome to my universe!
merlin5520355 8 months ago
stolen from russians..nothing new :/
dexnom1 9 months ago
The truth has now been revealed, my professional A team of covert US agents has now been exposed! .... Hello all, wake up! Geobat is new to aerodynamics. I've stolen nothing from anyone but the aerodynamics speak for themselves. Having said all this, Geobat rides upon all conventional aerodynamics and then some. It's the latter part of my words which is puzzling to all working on Geobat now.
merlin5520355 9 months ago
@dexnom1 I think Germany did it before Russia,
ZachariahLogan 9 months ago
This looks like an interesting concept, well done in getting this done in to a UAV. Is there any plans to compete with the full size aircraft kit market so we can see its perfomance when flown by a pilot. It looks like if it scales well, may well pull into higher G than a human can take which may have to be limited somehow.
speedyg2012 9 months ago
@speedyg2012 Full scale is my main goal, all scale work indicates a highly robust aircraft with regard to G forces. The pilot is now the limiting factor based on extrapolation. There are significant control surface variations that are proprietary. I'll worry about G forces when Geobat starts to show up at your local airport. Yes, this concept scales well, but it's at the cutting edge of design and efficiency, how this geometry plays out through time will be interesting for all.
merlin5520355 9 months ago
@TheMick5429 Thanks, be sure to see the video responses, a new Corp. intently is now developing Geobat into a UAV. Events are finally starting to click.
merlin5520355 10 months ago
Amazing, You have a great machine with huge possibilties and potential. That was the easy part. now you will win big or lose big.
fohtynine 11 months ago
Amazing, You have a great machine with huge possibilties and potential. That was the easy part. now you will win big or lose big.
fohtynine 11 months ago
@fohtynine I've come to terms with what I'm trying to accomplish. How this plays out will be very interesting. The geometry of Geobat and it's efficiency are 2 forces that will logically play out as time moves on....Thanks, I'm always marveled a bit in that such a simple Geometry can challenge conventional thinking.
merlin5520355 8 months ago
isn't that just a flying wing?
ishouldplayzelda 11 months ago
@ishouldplayzelda ...a Round one with different flaps.
bubblerings 11 months ago
@ishouldplayzelda Yes, but geobat is unusually stable and the concept of a flying ring offers many engineering possibilities.
merlin5520355 8 months ago
@merlin5520355 Your response is is exactly what we are all seeing on this end. The concept of a perfectly circular flying craft changes the playing field of aerodynamics. Aerobat Aviation inc, is actively driving the Geobat aerodynamic hammer. Google Aerobat Aviation Inc, to see the players. Flying saucers are coming,
how this comes into reality will be very interesting.
merlin5520355 7 months ago
they had ufo be for the man who made the seg motor made a flying ufo
alienhddna 11 months ago
Make a few big ones, fly them at night with laser pointers, will make news.
bubblerings 11 months ago
@bubblerings The UFO Hunters on the history channel have already been fooled by Geobat with lights. Expect more of this. Lasers? Good idea if they show up in video. I'm guessing that kind of energy is not cheap.
merlin5520355 11 months ago
@merlin5520355 Laser pointers are cheap on ebay...
On RC flying saucers, would be freaky to be approached by a squadron at night.
Ashton Kutcher might like to do it on Pranked!
-His friends fainting over UFO's coming up to them would be about his speed.
bubblerings 11 months ago
@bubblerings I'm talking about things here I don't fully understand. A simple laser will not be seen unless there is atmospheric smoke. My creative mind and my contacts have already pondered the equation. Conclusion, an impressive visual display is possible.
merlin5520355 8 months ago
@merlin5520355 Agreed. You are right.
Lasers would only have any strong visual effect, if aimed at somebody... or maybe in a foggy or hazy condition / smoke.
Oh, well.
bubblerings 8 months ago
no esta tan propio
gatos5mafiosos 11 months ago
Check out the smaller Geobat in the YouTube video " Aerobat Aviation Inc
presents the Geobat" It was filmed on the coast of Calif.
NiteFlight24 11 months ago
look up the TR-3B
sethzky77 1 year ago
This is nothing more than a round airplane with traditional air-lift characteristics, and propulsion, not a true flying saucer as described by UFO witnesses.
CaneFu 1 year ago 18
@CaneFu I understand your observation, UFOs as we understand them are way beyond Geobat. However, think of Geobat as the beginning of an airframe that will lead to new expressions in aerodynamics.
merlin5520355 11 months ago
awsome i want 1 this looks like a nice aircraft for aerobatics
SuperRama666 1 year ago
Thanks for giving me this idea and I believe you
Sadiq33950 1 year ago
It is not anything like a saucer, I't just a propeller powered plane with circle wings and a good arodynamic fuselodge it does not repel gravity like a saucer
thebteam300 1 year ago
@thebteam300 An efficient flying circle has never been realized until now. Tubes and wings now have competition. New technology will naturally be integrated using the dominate force of the ring. Rings rule in the field of structures and electromagnetics. Geobat represents the beginning of a new way of aerodynamic thinking.
merlin5520355 11 months ago
So? it's still a wing shape, getting lift in the same way as any other aircraft. It's more like just disguising the traditional aircraft shape while pretending that it's some kind of saucer.
I've seen tunnel wings that are more truly revolutionary, that can actually hover and are very maneuverable. But they are really different, unlike this effort to disguise a plane with wings into a "saucer" shape.
Good try and looks fun though.
airtech4 1 year ago
@airtech4 Geobat achieves lift in a slightly different way than conventional wings. Proprietary. The saucer aspect is just the beginning of the concept. Tunnel wings? Can you direct me further, I know of no efficient VTOL except for military applications as in thrust downward which are very fuel inefficient, dual tilt rotor is still trying to make into the commercial market.
merlin5520355 11 months ago
@merlin5520355 I don't have a link to any information about the round wings, but I had a friend who worked on the first prototypes. The last I heard they were working in Australia on a drone vehicle. it works the same as a conventional wing in that they create lift by a negative pressure on the top (or inside) portion of the wing, but they use the engines to blow air over the lifting surface, so they can get a negative pressure for lift, without having to go forward. So hovering is possible.
airtech4 11 months ago
Make it ten times larger and fill it with helium. It would be a quiet, economical and safe personal aircraft.
1971SuperLead 1 year ago
Yes, I've actually looked into this aspect with regards to RC and some of the concepts out there. It makes a lot of sense from a structural view point. i hope to try this at some point in the future. Imagine being at an indoor football game and this RC Geobat thing is performing slow motion aerobatics.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
personally i dont see the point of making an aeroplane to look good, if it wont fly well
VTOLAircraftMad 1 year ago
My intent was not to make it look esthetically beautiful, that's just the nature of everything I create. Geobat flies exceptionally well and is definitely in the ballpark of efficiency per the data we now have.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
well this video is four years old i dont think the companeys are bighting :P
ht448 1 year ago
I gave up on the big boys years ago. From my stand point their corporate minds are wedded to tubes and wings. This is going to take new thinking in aviation. I'm putting Payload = money over Lift and Drag. Structural integrity, flight characteristics and mission is also an important factor. Remember the Burnelli concept, great idea, they all ignored him and we still fly in missiles with wings. Speed is not that important important anymore. MIT came up with the Double Bubble design.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
хуйня
bigsexy55555 1 year ago
they have actually been around since the 30's
JustSomeGuyOk 1 year ago
Correction, they attempted to build saucer aircraft in the 30-50's. CG with regard to forward flight was the main reason they all failed. VTOL is one thing, makeing a disk behave in forward flight is another.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
@merlin5520355 ...they definitely had them during WW2
JustSomeGuyOk 1 year ago 6
U can not prove your statement. There is not 1 piece of documented evidence that shows saucers were operational "made by man" during WW2, however, it does appear the US military later created very large saucers but had stability problems and scrapped the whole idea. Stability! That's why the NRL visited me. If you know of such evidence please enlighten me. They might exist today given the aerodynamic hurdle has been bypassed, saucers have terrible flight characteristics. Geobat not included.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
@merlin5520355 actually there is documented evidence . and no i wont show you. is there any evidence that they are not made by man?
JustSomeGuyOk 1 year ago
@JustSomeGuyOk You appear to be confusing belief with evidence. I live in the land of logic and reason. Lack of evidence is proof? You can't show me because it doesn't exist!
merlin5520355 1 year ago
@merlin5520355 oh and where is your proof? this shitty video isnt enough
JustSomeGuyOk 1 year ago
@JustSomeGuyOk you started this post, I'm simply responding to you. Using profanity and insults reflect upon your character, all you have to do is stop posting. If you know you are right, enjoy your superior intellect.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
@merlin5520355 hmm i don't think i insulted you but yeah you're right i will
JustSomeGuyOk 1 year ago
@JustSomeGuyOk yeah thats why ur name is fuckin merlin ffs. and i didnt say i cant show u. i said i wont show you. now fuck off
JustSomeGuyOk 1 year ago
@JustSomeGuyOk no there is no evidence,because they Are made by man (Government Black OPS programs).
myleftnutts 1 year ago
@myleftnutts that was a terrible statement
JustSomeGuyOk 1 year ago
@JustSomeGuyOk is it untrue???.
myleftnutts 1 year ago
@merlin5520355 1st anti-gravity saucers were operational in "1925" the solidified anti-gravity theory existed as far back as the late 19th century,as did the theory of "ColdFusion" where in the hell did u think "jules verne" and "H.G Wells" two 19th century novelists got their ideas from???,the Sci-Fi channel,both of them were good buddies with "Mr.Tesla" and "Mr.Keely".your documented evidence is nothing more than government propaganda. see "J.Pharrel". nazi 3rd reich had 1st "A.G saucer.
myleftnutts 1 year ago
@myleftnutts America: the XF5U and the Nazi Project you stated, were both solid saucers, but the real porblem with their shape was high-turbulence levels, the XF5U had propellers on the outer edge of the saucer to eliminate that problem, the nazi was a jet/rocket project and therefor did not have the advantage the props had over the turbulence levels. both projects were canceled: 1(Nazi) by the end of WW2, the other(American) because the navy was too dang stupid and too dang greedy for jets
SpadSopwithAce 11 months ago
ghalleger said "to look with new eyes"
much congrats on a very stable form of aerodyne
badboybilzer 1 year ago
Thanks, imagination and logic combined with how doable is this in my lifetime. Let me show you the world through my eyes, Depeche Mode. If you are so interested I will send you a new demo for investors, contact me directly thru geobat....com
merlin5520355 1 year ago
Look's like great idea !!! Like it !
Tobi1087Tobi 1 year ago
Thanks, creating a viable flying circle, even after you have demonstrated it is not as straight forward as one might think. Wish me luck! Logic rules, and that is what drives me.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
@merlin5520355 Wish You luck !
Tobi1087Tobi 1 year ago
so what if this isnt a real flying saucer? we can't just take a huge step from what we have now to real flying saucers. the point is that we've made something better and more efficient than conventional airplanes. maybe this design will be modified and it will be even better! id love to see real airplanes like this someday.
djraatzz 1 year ago
Thank you very much, the phrase "Real Flying Saucers" was meant to catch your attention. It's very understandable that others are a bit disappointed, it "is" just an airplane but it's a geometry that allows for new thinking in aerodynamics to unfold. i too would like to crawl into a craft capable of hovering, mach 12 speeds, and fantastic maneuvers. Geobat represents something new to aviation, time will tell, practice your patience and lets see how far this concept penetrates the market.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
the goal is to get RID on the propeller completely!!! this is dumb!
ganjahyute1 1 year ago
@ganjahyute1 why? you do realize every passenger plane you ride in is propelled by, ready for this? A turbojet powered propeller also called a FAN. 8^) When you learn something about aviation let the world know.
GrigoriZhukov 1 year ago
Ok, your response is understandable. I and others see solutions you don't see. Have you ever lost a chess game when you thought you were going to win. I understand everything you are relating. I'm a very small determined entity within the vast world of aerospace but much brighter minds than mine see something in Geobat we don't understand. Time will tell, but present developments look promising. What really drives me nuts is that I can't tell anybody what's going on.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
As President Clinton said, I feel your pain. What you don't realize is to get a perfectly circular craft to fly predictably and stable with only a propeller is a historical achievement. However, the challenge is to advance it to the level that it competes with general aviation. They said at the time the Write Brothers were dumb. And in a sense they were, they got caught up in patent issues. I see the bigger picture.
merlin5520355 1 year ago
@merlin5520355 They will not have to lie no more .lol For they will see flying saucer.They did say that about the Write Brothers.We can do wonders if we try.We are in the image. Now we know .But in the image of what?
ONEWORD1GOD 1 year ago
Wow! I have to say, this is a very interesting design. I hope to see real live airplanes based on this model soon! =)
Haxecer 1 year ago
All the Negative Posters.......You might want to talk to the 'United States Department Of Defense" Cause they are interested!!!! On April 26 1998, three Naval Research Laboratory engineers arrived at the inventors home to verify the Geobat concept. (The Naval Research Laboratory is located in Washington D.C. and is a branch of the Department of Defense. They develop new ideas and technologies for military applications.).
matvfreelife 1 year ago
Good design but the concept will not make it to the commercial aeroplane companies, it will go straight to the USA defence laboratories which will fix a machine gun as a payload and churn thousands of them to kill millions around the world in the name of the so called 'war-against-terror'. The inventor was better off with not realising his childhood dream cz the pentagon now has a dangerous toy.
nasimwarwick 1 year ago
design is stupid, it just looks like a normal plane with a ring around it.
ussyless 1 year ago