Manitoba Bigfoot - THE ACTUAL FOOTAGE OF THE CREATURE

[hubby2467]

god damn it why are all found footages blurry

[iweb03]

Tss! Thats where my dad was that day lol

[awaldegrave]

I HEAR THEY PAYED $250,000 FOR THIS CRUMMY FILM

[IIBrutalGrinderII]

i love how people always get excited by a black dot in the woods XD

[isamtheman87]

I think its real

[windstorm1000]

@isamtheman87 Yes, I as well. The sincerety of the witness adds to the credibility here as much as the image--this is a level headed guy--he runs a ferry.

[silviom1963]

Looks like a camouflage hunter

[ibuprofenPill]

Just as always, Bigfoot always seems to find all the shaky, blurry and/or obstructed-view cameras in existence.

[bigdaddyshane]

Nice... a blurry video of a tree stump

[2bluefor1]

Snow,so there should have been....footprints......pictur­es of the footprints?.....

[timetodepop]

In an Italian family...When we see a Big hairy guy who communicates with a series of grunts...Stinks, and is seldom seen....We just call him DAD...No mystery

[jlsmsu12]

of course the cocksucker is out of focus.........because its BULLSHIT

[jlsmsu12]

of course the cocksucker is out of focus........because its BULLSHIT!!!!!!!

[KFalcon17]

I see a bear

[TheSaffell]

Nice Blobsquach.

[yamerules]

well ok here goes, back in mid 90s, in my hometown of crane river, on the shore of lake manitoba.. myself and my wife,were going out for a few drinks,in a town a few miles away in rorketon, well i was ready to go,so i came outside,and leaned up against the car,waiting..i lived there all my life,so i knew the area, BUT i heard something that was so fuked up of a noise,about half mile away ,up on a ridge , and my mothernlaw heard it to, these voices in the videos are exactaly the same moning crys

[guionlawes]

@Pyromaniac551 LMAO!!!

[xjuice207x]

It is called a Black Bear....standing on its hind feet to smell....

[99Sorc]

thats like the shittiest camera ever. my mediocre phone is ten times clearer.... lame

[rmcdaniel423]

@99Sorc Really?!? Your mediocre phone can take clear video of little details on the far side of a big lake on a humid misty overcast day? With no blurriness or camera shake? That's amazing!! All this time I thought National Geographic was using super expensive cameras with huge zoom lenses. NOPE! They use cell phones!! hahahaha

Give the guy a break.

[m00se321]

with all the sightings of Bigfoot,,,there must be Millions!!

[escapinginferno]

ok he couldnt focus the video because he was zoomed in all the way, and he's on the heavy side lol, but seriously i dont think anyone could focus when seeing bigfoot in front of your eyes...

[deiterkirkbride87]

I wonder why it was so blurry and shot far away.

[kukensbror]

It is nikolai Valuev!

[NapalmWeed]

The biggest shock to me was A Current Affair is still on TV!!!!!!!

[pdsand7]

It is so frustrating that most photos or tapes of supposed Bigfoot creatures are of this poor quality. Unless you have a clear image, like the Patterson film, just keep it to yourself.

[Blueskybutterflies]

@pdsand7

All are important. And then there's room for discernment.

[jerkfaceloser]

what's really amazing is that a current affair is still on! is it really still on?

[Blueskybutterflies]

@jerkfaceloser

LMAO. That...is funny

[timmyfung01]

damn, I am ok with the fact that some fools believe a black bear to be bigfoot, but now even the TV???? I guess that they were trying to get people to watch, but that was dumb.

[totalscammer]

inconclusive is not a better word. That implies that bigfoot exists. and he does not exist. so let's not perpetuate a silly old hoax that got started years ago.

[TheBlueFlamingo]

No, it doesn't prove anything. But, if it was faked, I would think it would be much better quality and not a blurry dot.  "Inconclusive" is a better word.

[grahamjpjones]

It just seems funny to me that people should conveniently have a video camera just when they Happen to see a so called Big foot. hmmm doesnt that ring bells as to the fact that this is fake and that you cannot clearly see the so called big foot due to distance and lack of focus.

[missieMaNU]

wow a black blur!

[Steve19891]

2005...my phone is a better camera than that thing

[Shady187MWK]

hey their indians, take it easy

[IEatBabiesK]

cant see SHYT

[Krytzia23]

thats my cousin SHUT UP

[ToferMc]

ur so white

[winnipegbluevictor]

this was done across a river thats why its blurry

it was done right by a rez that means reservation ya rednecks

[brewer4498]

yeah me too jrjr143 ever time they have a bigfoot sighting it either blurry or hiding in behind something!!!!!

[wtw88]

Yeah all the real ones are blurry.

[jrjr143]

sick of these "blurry" videos ! with todays high tech shit ! c'mon will ya!  i am not fooled by fakes

[sicuro75]

The area of wilderness is the ideal canopy for it to roam.

[JoeT001]

why didn't he take further pictures,, even later???? When it was safe-rrrr. even a couple of days or hours later, to take proofs of tracks????I can't believe that wasn't part of the evidence???? ONLY if there wasn't really anything,...then maybe he couldn't have had any proof of any type of tracks, right, even ten minutes later, when it became safe, do you know what I mean by that? that is a simple understanding of proofs,....

[LadyGreenEyes964]

Even my older crappy video camera has better focus than that! Digital focus, on a camera that takes tapes. No way I would see something that unusual, have a camera right there, and not get a better shot than that.

[codzilla12]

The Patterson footage has never been debunked as a hoax. No one has ever demonstrated how it was done. The original costume, or a matching costume, has ever been presented by skeptics, or by various ppl who claim to have worn the costume. Large amounts of money have been spent trying to make a matching costume. The best Movie costume designers have never succeeded. The BBC spent the most money. They failed. Every attempt to make a similar costume strengthens authenticity of the Patterson film.

[Kennsta56]

for all we know this could be my friends uncle!

[deathnote136]

i agree w/cheeseagogo this vid is so fake! if this vid is real it should be called manitoba blobsquatch!

[Zorann07]

Im from manitoba and it was obviously a black bear or possibly even a grizzly

[BIGFOOT425]

wow, didn't realize bears normally use 2 legs to walk around on while swinging their arms. thanx for letting us know. not saying its an actual BIGFOOT but id bet a paycheck its NO BEAR!

[shadyscream]

my dick can do better than that

[Hezza5]

lmfao!

[eheister2006]

worst evidence ever. If had taken that video and really thought it was a bigfoot, I'd be embarrassed to turn it in as evidence.

[dicboura]

I really couldn't tell. There are possibilities for it being a bear or bigfoot.

[chrisvscrispychicken]

Same here!

[hankz69]

..its obviously a bear

[MakeWay07]

solution to the problem of the video,convert this video to 1080p resolution and view it on a 1080p tv and hope to see a more clear image WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!­!!!!!!!!!!!

Problem fixed about the blurry videos or the hairy Beast

[bil56]

Doesn't everyone know that the creature saquatch itself is out of focus! LOL

[atkrunner]

That was a joke from Mitch Hedberg.

[YNation7]

LOL

[Ian7570]

Holly shit that is freaky. Definitely not human.

[sevenavenger]

Why with all the technology these days we cannot take a good picture, why the blurryness, why.

[YNation7]

That is a DAMN good question! The right one too. There is technology to make the picture better. But, it's not being used...

[rustilldown7]

It may not be fake but it is worthless. You can't prove anything with it.

[vballqueen1792]

Dude,bigfoot is freaking scray,can't see anything in the video though,but i wouldn't want 2 run into bigfoot!

[komodoman]

Problem with the vid is, it's not good enough to see anything, maybe it's real maybe not. Can't use it for much, I'm afraid.

[akqsuited]

every time someone says they have good proof you cant see it

[d4rkr34p3r]

i'm a huge believer and i know thats fake

[CusterFlux]

Credible witness, terrible video = we're not convinced, but he is: but then again, what does he know? He's just an Indian - and what sort of experience do they have with nature anyway?

[Priss1000]

Much ado about nothing! This guy shot 42 seconds of video and couldn't focus the camera any better than that? Hell it could be a rock or a shrub. It never seemed to move and at the end the subject not left the area. What stopped the video shooter from shooting more footage until he finally got his act together and focused the camera? I'm not saying this creature couldn't exist but this video footage is worthless. I wouldn't have given him a nickel for it.

[superdav]

It might be a blobsquatch , but it's still better than just some one saying " O I saw this hairy ape cross the road in front of me"

[L12]

idiot's go to the BFRO website for more BS

[Saturate]

Oh yeah man, dont you feel good about yourself? You have a blurry dot that looks like it's moving! If you wanna see a blurry bigfoot, let me spit on your camera lens.

[tloco28]

My god it's Shrubbery! Sorry looks like a bush. It never moves. Could be Bigfoot waiting for a bus by a highway.

[culululu7]

it was actually taking a leak. Which usually takes 7 min for the average skunk Ape

[Hezza5]

lmfao

[RezSnake]

Very remote First Nation...NO ONE there is this creative.

[guitarhero1248]

fake ... nice video tho i respect it

[PostToastie]

How do you know it is fake?

[sageofwinds]

*sigh* e-e....

once again, blurry picture...