Футбол не беговая дорожка, и сравнивать легендарного игрока по - скорости с игркоом который кроме скорости ему ничего противопоставить не может - это глупо.
He's comparing speed.... lol considering walcotts 100 meter... he's faster than henry. but game speed? i think henry has it. Its totally irrelevant who's the better player... which henry is.. for obvious reasons
I reckon Walcott would do better if he was in a less physical and slower league. Messi has already said that he thinks Walcott's pace could make him one of the most dangerous players to have to defend against. But the Premier League is fast already, and very strong. He just gets pushed off the ball too often, and can never use his pace to his advantage because defenders are always able to recover and get in to intercept his crosses. He'd do very well in the Italian or French league.
I just get a little angry at some of these dumbass comments, especially if these are from actual fans. Just enjoy the bliss of watching Arsenal's fastest players blaze the pitch against their opposition. It's a speed compilation, just enjoy watching them already!
Theres no doubt that walcott is faster but Henry would glide past defenders like they weren't there then have the elegance to finish it with such finese for me there no comparison of the two atm Walcott isnt even on the same level as Henry maybe in years time he will be you can never know with football but as it stands Henry is the far better player. (Henry in his top level days I have made the comparison with Walcott)
Ronaldo, Henry, Cristiano Ronaldo, Roberto Carlos, Eto'o, and Ronaldhino were one of the fastest players and not only that but they scored hundreds of goals. Walcott just runs.
The fact that Henry is actually reliable on the ball plus his pace is what made him so good. Theo only has pace...unfortunately with the added pressure of being the next Henry probably didn't help either.
5:12 half the players in the EPL would have fell on the ground and cried like a little gay bitch and continued to fuel the bad name this game is getting... But Henry took it like a man and got back up, that's what the game is meant to be like kiddies!
henry is faster in the sense that he gets from point A to his intended target, the fucking goal, and completes it. Walcott will just run to the corner and waste our time.
Walcott is faster. BUT , Henry, for me, has the flare, the way he can run soo fast, at his body build, take on defenders, show some skill, and get an assist or even a goal, is simply amazing.
Walcott has got nothing but fast speed. That's it. While, Thierry possess everything a striker can dream of - passing, dribbling, skills, crossing, finishing and all other fundamentals. Walcott will never improve, he's been with the club for 6 years and shows no sign of improving. Too inconsistent to play - one game he's playing good and then plays s**t on the next 5+ games.
The main difference is Henry having great composure and a great touch while Walcott is just pacey and lacks the final ball. I think he's the player who's been the most out of form at the moment. But he still has years to learn from and it would be a shame to lose him to a rival club.
as a united fan i have to say, henry is in a different league to walcott, everytime henry touched the ball, id be afraid. When walcott gets it I relax completely.
titi is way more faster than walcott for sure and in my opinion henry is a legend,he was an excellent dribbler,pin point passer,dead ball speacilist,an ultimate finisher and walcott is a rather fast black man.
henry, at walcott's age, wasn't any better. a flop from juventus. if walcott finds his true nature and gets on his feet with a little advice from wenger, he can be huge
@amarbysgln Henry played less than 20 games at Juve. He didn't even play a full season. So I don't think its reasonable to compare Henry's short stint at Juve with Theo who has already played a lot of games for Arsenal at that age. The difference is that Henry had more quality. World class technical ability to go with his incredible athletic talents. Clare Fontaine produced a great generation of French players that dominated world football for a period, just like Spain is doing now.
Walcott has the attributes to be a fantastic player. He's still so young. I just don't feel he'll ever make anything of himself at Arsenal. Chamberlain and Miyachi will both be first choice soon. As for Henry, one of the greatest to ever grace the game of football.
Henry used to ghost past opposition players as if they weren't there, Walcott runs into people and turns back on himself because he runs out of ideas! i had such high hopes for him, but he just hasn't got a footballing brain. Oxlade-Chamberlain on the other hand is already better than walcott, he is truly a supreme talent! Cant wait for the future England team! Hart, Bertrand, Smalling, Jones, Walker, McEachran, Wilshere, Cleverly, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Welbeck, Rose. Get rid of the old guard!
just a quick reminder that walcott is still only 22. Thierry Henry was kinda crap at that age. I remember in the worldcup 98 henry did so crap against Italy that they had to switch his wing because he couldn't get past Maldini even a single time!
So lets have patience. Walcott has improved immensely the last year or so and his runs and crosses have become more dangerous. Comparing his young career to a Legend of Arsenal is a little unrealistic.
@chansensei999 I agree, he is giving plenty of assists and is only going to get better. Would be nice if he can develop into a back-up striker for RVP to rest every once in a while, and open the right wing up to the Ox, so we can have a bit more rotation up from. I think in a year or two Walcott will a fantastic player providing Arsenal can keep him.
@chansensei999 The difference being maldini was the best left back that ever lived, Walcott struggles to beat numerous left backs in the premier league (Enrique, Evra, Cole, Clichy, Baines to name but a few), Walcott has pace and very little else, Henry had the pace and a quality touch more importantly composure even in his younger days.
@chansensei999 this is a video about who's the fastest.. not who's the best - and there is not any shame in saying Henry had the speed of Walcott and still have much better touch and technicality
@chansensei999 Is that why Henry was top scorer in both the 98' World Cup and Euro 2000? Yeah, must have been really shit considering they won both tournaments.
@chansensei999 Are you stupid? Henry came to arsenal when he was 22 and had a crazy season with arsenal (26 goals and 11 assists). As a result, i will compare them. I know its harsh to compare him with a legend at this age, but that what he gets for wearing the no 14 shirt, huge expectations come with that number. In conclusion Henry >>>>>>>> Walcott. No technique, no football intelligence, no consistency and i used to think he could also finish. He a mediocre footballer at best with pace.
@chansensei999 And for regarding internationals, Walcott not saying much for england nowadays. Henry was an euro and world cup winner at his age, dont u ever say he was crap. I do rate ur optimism, but i have lost hope in this guy. We signed the wrong guy at Southampton and many arsenal fans will agree. And for patience, we had not won a trophy for a long time and if we dont win a trophy RVP is leaving, this man deserves to be winning trophies.
@chansensei999 The only crap is here is you and your stupid comments, henry fucking ruled since the beginning, obviously your were too stupid to understand football in that football, have you seen how skillful and easy he used to dribble opponents? how 12 are you anyway?
@chansensei999 to be fair, that's vs a near prime maldini, a mountainous task for prime ronaldo, yet alone a 20 year old. Isn't it true Cristiano ronaldo had to be switched flanks because he was shut down by dani alves this year? The difference was technique, Henry, always showed dribble technique, the only technique walcott has shown is arguably finishing.
Brazilian Ronaldo was the best player at the age of 19. Fernando Torres was captain of Athletico Madrid at the age of 17. Henry score at least twice in the Euros 2000 aged 22. Messi scored 47 goals in one season aged 22. C.Ronaldo scored 42 goals aged 23. Eto'o was a professional player aged 14. Rooney was good aged 16.
I could understand if Walcott just joined Arsenal, but he has been there in the FIRST team for 5 years. Did he not learn ANYTHING from Henry????
@chansensei999 its not about getting past people... henry is a much smarter player... walcott depends too much on speed, hes going to end up like shaun wright phillips
I'm not an Arsenal fan, but I'd be embarrassed to mention Walcott in the same sentence as Henry if I were. As a United fan I admit Henry is a legend; for a club I would much rather be in the title race than the current teams, but Walcott has a long road ahead of him if he wants to get anywhere near Henry or his level.
thierry henry is faster when he was was in his prime. Donot gett me wrong, walcot is fast. Although, Thierry also had the skill, shot, and quickness to become a legend. Walcot really only has speed and a decent cross.
Maybe Walcott is a little bit faster..but Thierry is VERY, VERY fast too, and he had everything else, to be the best striker in the world. Sadly, his career is going to the end, I wish he will be Arsene assistant in the future.
This is true speed. Ronaldo wouldn't stand a chance. See, if white people knew anything about running, then they would know that having quick feet does not determine how fast you run. It all has to do with how you apply power to the ground. The less time you spend on the ground the quicker you go. It's all about have controlled long natural strides.
Walcott is not much of a footballer at all really. All he has is speed. And there are lots of thos types of players, yet Walcott doesn't even know how to use his pace well. Guys like Bale, Lavezzi, and Valencia at least have learned how to make their speed a weapon. Walcott is faster than all of them, yet he has no idea how to get by players consistently using his speed. Walcott would never be able to do to Maicon what Bale did, but he is even faster.
@MrKurtyP If that was true, why do pacy players tend to flourish in England, but generally fail in Spain? Spanish football is far more tactically and passing orientated, and players that rely solely on pace don't cut it.
name of the song is Sts9 - Tokyo
thumbs up
MrNelsonguy 19 minutes ago
Does anybody know the name of the song???????
TheSnoothshannon 22 hours ago
@TheSnoothshannon sts9 - tokyo
MrNelsonguy 1 minute ago in playlist Liked videos
14= SPEED!!!
Darkruler5 1 day ago
Wow, watching this video it's actually incredible how much walcott plays like henry, he may not be better but will always be my favourite player.
TJW14 Forever
ArsenalMadAndy 1 day ago
Henry is faster ..
TheGuix13 1 day ago
0:32 so fast you can't see his legs.
MrKazzi0 1 day ago
compare the skills their you will find the true winner
patriciascott61 2 days ago
Футбол не беговая дорожка, и сравнивать легендарного игрока по - скорости с игркоом который кроме скорости ему ничего противопоставить не может - это глупо.
Ololomlya 2 days ago
the difference? > goals
chelseafan15 2 days ago
Henry may not faster but he better.
TheMessido 3 days ago
and they both use to be in the same team!!!!!!!
dylanzzz1001 3 days ago
henry looks like he's running on roller blades in the first clip.
usdx329 3 days ago
Like these two could ever be put side by side
VideoFletcher 3 days ago
OMG! Look how fast Henry was when he was young in the first clip! AMAZING!
Son0fBinladen 3 days ago
He's comparing speed.... lol considering walcotts 100 meter... he's faster than henry. but game speed? i think henry has it. Its totally irrelevant who's the better player... which henry is.. for obvious reasons
HoldupnWatch 4 days ago
HENRYS LIKE A BUGGATI WALCOTTN IS LIKE A BEATLE COMPARED TO HENRY IN HIS PRIME
121ibisukmadik 4 days ago
hahaha this video actually makes walcott look like a good player
MacSweenz 4 days ago
pace abuse much jeez
arsenalftw3654 5 days ago
henry is well faster
chevc004 5 days ago
After seeing this video I wonder why fifa made his pace 82 it should be way more around the 90...
mesudmaffia 5 days ago
7 beckham + 7 Ronaldo = 14 Henry
Matiis31 6 days ago 3
I reckon Walcott would do better if he was in a less physical and slower league. Messi has already said that he thinks Walcott's pace could make him one of the most dangerous players to have to defend against. But the Premier League is fast already, and very strong. He just gets pushed off the ball too often, and can never use his pace to his advantage because defenders are always able to recover and get in to intercept his crosses. He'd do very well in the Italian or French league.
fluffymole0913 6 days ago
Have you watched walcott this season. I swear I've seen faster movement from a snail dosed up with sleeping tablets.
xV1P3RxRKO 6 days ago
Messi wins!
promokt 6 days ago
0:30 flying henry
almanjulhijan 1 week ago
walcott is good at running the ball out of play, his crossing is poor and shooting is shite
seamydev 1 week ago
henry has it all, all walcott has is speed
seamydev 1 week ago
great vid man and nice music, thx for the upload
MrTHEOTHERGUYS 1 week ago
henry > walcot
hamdanfalcon 1 week ago
please don't ever compare Henry to walcott again, i should report this video for insulting Henry
bizzle19 1 week ago 52
@bizzle19
Wack ass wannabe rapper, just for that i'm goin to make another walcott and henry video
ThaBlasian206 1 week ago 15
@ThaBlasian206 He has a point though, Walcott shouldn't be compared to Henry...
TheStonesareus 5 hours ago
@TheStonesareus
I just get a little angry at some of these dumbass comments, especially if these are from actual fans. Just enjoy the bliss of watching Arsenal's fastest players blaze the pitch against their opposition. It's a speed compilation, just enjoy watching them already!
ThaBlasian206 1 hour ago
@bizzle19 he said speed, not skill....
PhillyII 1 week ago
@bizzle19 He's just comparing their pace you mong. Not like he's comparing them as overall players.
fluffymole0913 6 days ago
@bizzle19
its a speed comparison...not a skills/career comparison..read the title perhaps
ssnaser 5 days ago
Henry used his pace to beat players, find space and score goals but Walcott just runs and runs...
TeaStudios 1 week ago
Henry is the better player by far.
sidewalkmedia 1 week ago
pretty good quality for using a calculator actually...
usamabutt12345 1 week ago
Theres no doubt that walcott is faster but Henry would glide past defenders like they weren't there then have the elegance to finish it with such finese for me there no comparison of the two atm Walcott isnt even on the same level as Henry maybe in years time he will be you can never know with football but as it stands Henry is the far better player. (Henry in his top level days I have made the comparison with Walcott)
lukewelden 1 week ago
Walcot got the nr 14 shirt because he has drawn comparison to henry.
MandelaDaKiller 1 week ago
The long legs of Henry could outrun any player on counter atacks, whereas Theo Walcot has a tremendes acceleration, also Henry actually scored alot.
pensterify 1 week ago
Walcott is lame, can't compare him to T.Henry.
arielmadridista 1 week ago
Two rather fast European men of African decent.
CTurtlee 1 week ago
Ronaldo, Henry, Cristiano Ronaldo, Roberto Carlos, Eto'o, and Ronaldhino were one of the fastest players and not only that but they scored hundreds of goals. Walcott just runs.
TheShadowgamer01 1 week ago
@TheShadowgamer01 True.
pensterify 1 week ago
Comparing Walcott to Henry is a disgrace to the Henry.. :-)
Philifornication 1 week ago
The only difference between henry and walcott is that henry can actually score goals
Adodereader1 1 week ago 3
The difference is Henry thinks what to do with the ball when he runs and Walcott, well...... just run and run and runs.....
alevakarya 1 week ago 3
Two rather fast black men.
sayed24alem 1 week ago
can't really see who's wallcott nor Henry. xD
sWeexyneSS 1 week ago
The fact that Henry is actually reliable on the ball plus his pace is what made him so good. Theo only has pace...unfortunately with the added pressure of being the next Henry probably didn't help either.
walzort 1 week ago
Henry was amazing walcott is pure shit all he has is pace and thats the only reason he is a professional footballer
byrner7 1 week ago
henry is faster than theo walcot
halmoo100 1 week ago
5:12 half the players in the EPL would have fell on the ground and cried like a little gay bitch and continued to fuel the bad name this game is getting... But Henry took it like a man and got back up, that's what the game is meant to be like kiddies!
NoPhame 2 weeks ago 2
henry is faster in the sense that he gets from point A to his intended target, the fucking goal, and completes it. Walcott will just run to the corner and waste our time.
nutcrakerz 2 weeks ago 3
Walcott is faster. BUT , Henry, for me, has the flare, the way he can run soo fast, at his body build, take on defenders, show some skill, and get an assist or even a goal, is simply amazing.
AlqebraArts 2 weeks ago
@AlqebraArts
I read once than Henry top speed was 2 km/h faster than Walcott on a FIFA data chart... but... how the hell did FIFA made this chart... lol
shiloushilou 2 weeks ago
combine thier speed and u have usain bolt with rocket boosters on his shoes
ghostwing961 2 weeks ago
No goals of robin van persie? wha tan surprise:O
iDutchTwins 2 weeks ago
walcott could have been great but he was overused to early and so he hadn't to improve to be in the first team, my opinion :P
domiisbaack 2 weeks ago
ONE PLAYER IN THIS VIDEO USED SPEED TO WIN TROPHIES.
THE OTHER HAS SPEED FOR NOTHING
VAMediaTV 2 weeks ago 2
Walcott doesn't deserve to be in the same vid as herny let alone deserve his number 14 shirt.
OnlyOneTyping 2 weeks ago 3
RATHER FAST BLACK MEN
234hairbrush 2 weeks ago
Walcott has got nothing but fast speed. That's it. While, Thierry possess everything a striker can dream of - passing, dribbling, skills, crossing, finishing and all other fundamentals. Walcott will never improve, he's been with the club for 6 years and shows no sign of improving. Too inconsistent to play - one game he's playing good and then plays s**t on the next 5+ games.
Joy2daaworld 2 weeks ago
Of course 0:05 wasn't fake, he is just way faster than the defenders, it's was an official game with france so you cant't fake that, can you?
MegaMgigi 2 weeks ago
Henry!
MegaMgigi 2 weeks ago
0:05 fake?
TheOttoson 2 weeks ago
the first clip wasssssssssssss eeeeeeepppppppiiiiic
Ahmed12345626 2 weeks ago
Walcott has the ability to be a great player...in the future. But he will never be as legendary as Henry.
usgymnastics2012 2 weeks ago
is the first clip in fast forward?
Nick781CY 2 weeks ago
@Nick781CY Nope, he's just that fast (was). :D
PapaDoz 2 weeks ago in playlist Arsenal FC
the only thing is henry can end up scoring...
but theo is still young :)
anS0N1997 2 weeks ago
The main difference is Henry having great composure and a great touch while Walcott is just pacey and lacks the final ball. I think he's the player who's been the most out of form at the moment. But he still has years to learn from and it would be a shame to lose him to a rival club.
Myrealm7 2 weeks ago
SWEATY GOALS :D
jackwelch1000 2 weeks ago
as a united fan i have to say, henry is in a different league to walcott, everytime henry touched the ball, id be afraid. When walcott gets it I relax completely.
mully133 2 weeks ago
i think Henry had had better touch and skill while running with the ball and Theo has pure pace
premzzay97 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Henry is
┏━━┳━━┳━━┳━┳━━┓
┃┏┓┃┏━┫┏┓┃┏┻┓┏┛
┃┗┛┃┗┓┃┗┛┃┗┓┃┃
┃┏┓┫┏┛┃┏┓┣┓┃┃┃
┃┗┛┃┗━┫┃┃┣┛┃┃┃
┗━━┻━━┻┛┗┻━┛┗┛
sabesan2311 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Henry is ┏━━┳━━┳━━┳━┳━━┓
┃┏┓┃┏━┫┏┓┃┏┻┓┏┛
┃┗┛┃┗┓┃┗┛┃┗┓┃┃
┃┏┓┫┏┛┃┏┓┣┓┃┃┃
┃┗┛┃┗━┫┃┃┣┛┃┃┃
┗━━┻━━┻┛┗┻━┛┗┛
sabesan2311 2 weeks ago
good work with the video dude! And i never knew that henry was that amazing.
thenaveed5195 2 weeks ago
HENRY
FIFAtoddie32 2 weeks ago
titi is way more faster than walcott for sure and in my opinion henry is a legend,he was an excellent dribbler,pin point passer,dead ball speacilist,an ultimate finisher and walcott is a rather fast black man.
06sina06 2 weeks ago
@06sina06 what do you mean was?he's still an excellent dribler...etc. ;)
hyyydexxx 2 weeks ago
song is Tokyo by STS9... saw someone ask for it
NikeAirZoom9 2 weeks ago
@NikeAirZoom9 Cheers dude, saved me the trouble of posting to ask for that particular piece of info! :D
PapaDoz 2 weeks ago
Henry has better skill and finish.
superyiplee 2 weeks ago
nice video, but dude.. don't you have any taste of music??
BalkanPartyBus 2 weeks ago
0:33 Wheres Henry's Legs?
TheJacker47 2 weeks ago 73
@TheJacker47 what i was thinking :)
tom196rules 2 weeks ago
@TheJacker47 va tan rapido que la camara no nota las piernas:)
marcelosandoya 2 weeks ago
@TheJacker47 Too fast you can't even see em'
GuNNeR88V 2 weeks ago
@TheJacker47 Too fast for camera
ImmortalThugsta 2 weeks ago
@TheJacker47 you sir are pampered too lot..or have a poor sight
TheSereeen 1 week ago
@TheJacker47 I think its the Pixel 4234.23423
killekillekille1 1 week ago
Henry joined Barca to show them what football is and l8ter returned to Arsenal for a sip of quality
JSArsenal17 2 weeks ago
Walcott's speed is his only decent attribute. If he learnt to cross the ball then Arsenal would actually be in the title race.
834373 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Song is Tokyo by Sound Tribe Sector 9
TheWitwicky 2 weeks ago
henry was lookin like he was always joging
livelifendlovelife 3 weeks ago
3:56 was Carragher running backwards?
BlOoMa2009 3 weeks ago 4
I deeply hope MIYAICHI will be as good player as WALCOT.
Teo is enough good player for japanese.
As one of japanese,I am dreaming that MIYAICH will be regend of GUNNERS.
Gamba RYO!
taisonmamoru 3 weeks ago
Henry (Y)
KyN17208 3 weeks ago
henry, at walcott's age, wasn't any better. a flop from juventus. if walcott finds his true nature and gets on his feet with a little advice from wenger, he can be huge
amarbysgln 3 weeks ago
@amarbysgln Henry played less than 20 games at Juve. He didn't even play a full season. So I don't think its reasonable to compare Henry's short stint at Juve with Theo who has already played a lot of games for Arsenal at that age. The difference is that Henry had more quality. World class technical ability to go with his incredible athletic talents. Clare Fontaine produced a great generation of French players that dominated world football for a period, just like Spain is doing now.
bolder2009 3 weeks ago 2
Never ever ever ever will walcott be as good as Henry why is he even wearing # 14
bibi39 3 weeks ago
name of song plz .
klf4lsox2lcmycloct34 3 weeks ago
Both Gooner fuckwits
Jellymanuk 3 weeks ago
0:33 henry has no legs.
louisworth 3 weeks ago
Walcott has the attributes to be a fantastic player. He's still so young. I just don't feel he'll ever make anything of himself at Arsenal. Chamberlain and Miyachi will both be first choice soon. As for Henry, one of the greatest to ever grace the game of football.
BritishKidTeamUK 3 weeks ago
0:38 he has no legs on this potato.
GuidesAndMetal 3 weeks ago
Henry used to ghost past opposition players as if they weren't there, Walcott runs into people and turns back on himself because he runs out of ideas! i had such high hopes for him, but he just hasn't got a footballing brain. Oxlade-Chamberlain on the other hand is already better than walcott, he is truly a supreme talent! Cant wait for the future England team! Hart, Bertrand, Smalling, Jones, Walker, McEachran, Wilshere, Cleverly, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Welbeck, Rose. Get rid of the old guard!
SmithBoi1991 3 weeks ago
TOKYO
davisCkevin 3 weeks ago
I almost shed a tear watching those vintage King Thierry Henry moments... #LivingLegend
Kulpee 3 weeks ago
Final ball is not yet there for Theo, when and if he figures that out - only then we can compare the two.
TheSlackerebel 3 weeks ago
Shame you never showed any of the finishes on the end of these fantastic runs....
SHOTTONLEGEND 3 weeks ago
0:30 Invisible legs!!!
XDHawkster 3 weeks ago
Is messi faster then Henry? dont say im idiot kid fan of messi im just asking who is faster?
bartaz2000 3 weeks ago
jesus wept henry could probably break the sound barrier on his first run
mrfreekick1992 3 weeks ago
Who do you think is the ambassador for Nike's Mercurial in the past before C. Ronaldo?
kuciaotopi 3 weeks ago
you can't compare walcott to Henry... Walcott is a good player but Henry is a Legend!
marouanwolf1 3 weeks ago
@lason100 you play too much fifa 12 to be saying what you just said.
crazymonkey04 3 weeks ago
Walcott isn't a footballer. He should be running the olympics. Henry is a legend
Audiotwist 3 weeks ago
0:30 Invincible legs ^^
ThePlatypus9 3 weeks ago
all this people hating walcot are probebly completly shit at football
Spic3yApple 3 weeks ago
Walcott is crap. Speed doesnt matter if theres no end product.
Fessalbeatz 3 weeks ago
just a quick reminder that walcott is still only 22. Thierry Henry was kinda crap at that age. I remember in the worldcup 98 henry did so crap against Italy that they had to switch his wing because he couldn't get past Maldini even a single time!
So lets have patience. Walcott has improved immensely the last year or so and his runs and crosses have become more dangerous. Comparing his young career to a Legend of Arsenal is a little unrealistic.
chansensei999 3 weeks ago 27
@chansensei999 I agree, he is giving plenty of assists and is only going to get better. Would be nice if he can develop into a back-up striker for RVP to rest every once in a while, and open the right wing up to the Ox, so we can have a bit more rotation up from. I think in a year or two Walcott will a fantastic player providing Arsenal can keep him.
cmasterchief 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999 The difference being maldini was the best left back that ever lived, Walcott struggles to beat numerous left backs in the premier league (Enrique, Evra, Cole, Clichy, Baines to name but a few), Walcott has pace and very little else, Henry had the pace and a quality touch more importantly composure even in his younger days.
dipsetgary 3 weeks ago 3
@chansensei999 this is a video about who's the fastest.. not who's the best - and there is not any shame in saying Henry had the speed of Walcott and still have much better touch and technicality
mariuzzinho 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999 Is that why Henry was top scorer in both the 98' World Cup and Euro 2000? Yeah, must have been really shit considering they won both tournaments.
OSXHD 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999 I think Walcott is shit, but trying to fill Henry's boots, no thankyou. Give him 5 years, then we can decide!?
frankinstyyn 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999 Theo needs to improve his body balance alot.
oldskoollike 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999
cant past maldini isnt crap dude!!
MrVashilluchmun 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999 Lol when you get older you get slower dude, Henry already passed that age.
skillerohn 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999 Are you stupid? Henry came to arsenal when he was 22 and had a crazy season with arsenal (26 goals and 11 assists). As a result, i will compare them. I know its harsh to compare him with a legend at this age, but that what he gets for wearing the no 14 shirt, huge expectations come with that number. In conclusion Henry >>>>>>>> Walcott. No technique, no football intelligence, no consistency and i used to think he could also finish. He a mediocre footballer at best with pace.
bobbyv369 3 weeks ago 2
@chansensei999 And for regarding internationals, Walcott not saying much for england nowadays. Henry was an euro and world cup winner at his age, dont u ever say he was crap. I do rate ur optimism, but i have lost hope in this guy. We signed the wrong guy at Southampton and many arsenal fans will agree. And for patience, we had not won a trophy for a long time and if we dont win a trophy RVP is leaving, this man deserves to be winning trophies.
bobbyv369 3 weeks ago
@chansensei999 The only crap is here is you and your stupid comments, henry fucking ruled since the beginning, obviously your were too stupid to understand football in that football, have you seen how skillful and easy he used to dribble opponents? how 12 are you anyway?
DrzSpectre 2 weeks ago
@chansensei999 - Yh agree completely, people hate too much on Walcott, he's a good player but still needs to improve things.
Coming from a Tottenham supporter.
:D
SouthyMandem 2 weeks ago
@chansensei999 It is not personal but Theo is, like Cartrol and Henderson, a hyped up player. Little real technique.
warriorprince1010 2 weeks ago
@chansensei999
LMAO
octopielol 2 weeks ago
@chansensei999 to be fair, that's vs a near prime maldini, a mountainous task for prime ronaldo, yet alone a 20 year old. Isn't it true Cristiano ronaldo had to be switched flanks because he was shut down by dani alves this year? The difference was technique, Henry, always showed dribble technique, the only technique walcott has shown is arguably finishing.
alvin755 2 weeks ago
@chansensei999 Maldini <3
herolll22 2 weeks ago
@chansensei999
Brazilian Ronaldo was the best player at the age of 19. Fernando Torres was captain of Athletico Madrid at the age of 17. Henry score at least twice in the Euros 2000 aged 22. Messi scored 47 goals in one season aged 22. C.Ronaldo scored 42 goals aged 23. Eto'o was a professional player aged 14. Rooney was good aged 16.
I could understand if Walcott just joined Arsenal, but he has been there in the FIRST team for 5 years. Did he not learn ANYTHING from Henry????
brightlights456X 2 weeks ago 51
@brightlights456X i don't think you can "learn" henry's skills/instincts
demondayzzz 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@demondayzzz
Thats true, but he could learn certain things like free-kicks or getting better with his left foot.
Walcott might be given the boot is the Daily Mail story is correct.
brightlights456X 2 weeks ago
@brightlights456X omg. u said what everyone that watches football wants to say. what is walcott doing. even ox chamberlain could outshine him!
jidetolenu 1 week ago
@jidetolenu
Thank-you :D
brightlights456X 1 week ago
@chansensei999 its not about getting past people... henry is a much smarter player... walcott depends too much on speed, hes going to end up like shaun wright phillips
umdkaskar 2 weeks ago
3:54- I remember that game like it was yesterday.. 0-0 (2002). 'cause of that game, I knew Henry was VERY FAST (keyword- was)
eo1988 3 weeks ago
I'm not an Arsenal fan, but I'd be embarrassed to mention Walcott in the same sentence as Henry if I were. As a United fan I admit Henry is a legend; for a club I would much rather be in the title race than the current teams, but Walcott has a long road ahead of him if he wants to get anywhere near Henry or his level.
YnkogNyto 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
.
Check out Channel: "forwardinfootball" !!
.
.
paulfraughton 3 weeks ago
5:10 .... how many players would have stayed down and looked at the ref or some pussy shit?
Henry is a legend
frostythanug 3 weeks ago
thierry henry is faster when he was was in his prime. Donot gett me wrong, walcot is fast. Although, Thierry also had the skill, shot, and quickness to become a legend. Walcot really only has speed and a decent cross.
Slishman918 3 weeks ago
walcott cant lace henrys boots never mind take his number!
deltingfc 3 weeks ago
Henry was the best in the WORLD at his prime.
Atif1811981 3 weeks ago
Maybe Walcott is a little bit faster..but Thierry is VERY, VERY fast too, and he had everything else, to be the best striker in the world. Sadly, his career is going to the end, I wish he will be Arsene assistant in the future.
coreyfuckin8 3 weeks ago
Henry is stronger, better finisher, better skill and Walcott just has pace
TheHaloReachisawesom 3 weeks ago
0:35-0:41 :O
SkilliciousDesigns 3 weeks ago
0:06 friggin' sliders!
TheSOULSKATER9 3 weeks ago
the difference, walcott runs into defends, Thierry Henry ran it into the NET.
ChunkyyLaad 4 weeks ago
speed is the only thing this man and boy have in common
picspc 4 weeks ago
This is true speed. Ronaldo wouldn't stand a chance. See, if white people knew anything about running, then they would know that having quick feet does not determine how fast you run. It all has to do with how you apply power to the ground. The less time you spend on the ground the quicker you go. It's all about have controlled long natural strides.
Elififa 4 weeks ago
3:30 Eboue lol...
=DDDD
ArsenalKazakhstan 4 weeks ago
i love that at the end of every theo clip nothing happens and every henry one ther'a a goal :)
7tcbailey 4 weeks ago 11
walcott should give henry back the number 14 jersey
tinkbwt 4 weeks ago
Walcott is not much of a footballer at all really. All he has is speed. And there are lots of thos types of players, yet Walcott doesn't even know how to use his pace well. Guys like Bale, Lavezzi, and Valencia at least have learned how to make their speed a weapon. Walcott is faster than all of them, yet he has no idea how to get by players consistently using his speed. Walcott would never be able to do to Maicon what Bale did, but he is even faster.
Iason100 4 weeks ago 2
How can you compare one of the best players of all time, with theo shitty walcott
MckenzieDeLuXe 4 weeks ago
Whats the name of the song?? I need it
No comparison - Walcott has only got pace, even OX is better - Henry is the greatest striker of the last 20 years Bar R9 and maybe Van Basten
97raqeeb 1 month ago
walcott would be immense in spain, as he would get so much space
MrKurtyP 1 month ago
@MrKurtyP If that was true, why do pacy players tend to flourish in England, but generally fail in Spain? Spanish football is far more tactically and passing orientated, and players that rely solely on pace don't cut it.
felix8989 1 month ago
back in henrys prime days was the most complete striker around
FaNaGaNtHD 1 month ago
Comment removed
FaNaGaNtHD 1 month ago