Added: 4 years ago
From: videopostman
Views: 40,011
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (152)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Brahma = ever expanding, brahmastra = nuclear bomb , expanding of atoms and colliding creates nuclear explosion.

  • Among Europeans,Greeks have old culture and literature.But,the entire Greek literature not even 10% of huge Vedic literary Corpus which exclude thousands and thousands of manuscripts still sleeping across many libraries in India and the world yet to be deciphered.

    So,you people mean to say those Aryans got mysterious knowledge on touching Indian soil to surpass in literature and architecture above those original Aryans if migrated!

    Good sense among you people!

    Keep your fraud with you!!

  • @ 97448able

    You people have sense in what way!

    Will you reject modern genetic study which conducted by many westerners themselves which disproved Aryan Invasion theory.

    Last century approximations so much valid for you people.Is it not!

  • wow amazing!

  • @kaiyaaz Truly amazing! That Indian Sanskritists do not appear to recognize the obvious inaccuracies in this video! Takes an American such as myself to point this out? Wow!

    "Tantras...are the practices of the 'Proto Vedic" people"? unbelievable!

    He also states that the Vedic Dialect was the language of the Streets during the time of Panini. He appears to believe that the Rig Veda was composed in Classical Sanskrit!

    Yes it is truly amazing. Wow!

  • The Tantras are the shamanic practices of the "Proto Vedic" people and are the oldest of this tradition? If he says so. I do not know the Tantras, but I do know the Vedas especially the Rig Veda. The Rig Veda is the oldest of this Tradition, why he pulls this Tantra new age dribble out of thin air I do not know...he's the expert?

    Veda is sometimes used in narrow sense: four Vedas and a wider sense to include Brahmanas, Sutras etc.

    Bhagavad Gita is a small section of MahaBharat.

  • @97448able Excuse me. Normally this would not overly bother or concern me. However, this individual represents himself as a "scholar', publishes a book, appears in the public domain , and passes himself off as some sort of expert about these matters.

    I just googled Tantric. According to Wikipedia Tantric was a religous movement that started during the medieval period in India, and was rejected by many orothodox Vedic followers. He is inaccurate, by several thousand years; Proto Vedic ?

  • @97448able Wikipedia is a cesspool filled with anti-Indian and anti-Hindu articles written by halfwits and untouchables (westerners)... The Tantras have arisen from the Agamic principles that are part of the corpus of HIndu philosophy... The Veda is not a monolithic book like that of the desert cults' (torah/bible/quran).. they are perennial knowledge that is forever existent and for someone to "hear" them (Sruti), they have to be in a super-consscious state of SamAdhI....

  • @MahaVakyas Wikipedia is not always accurate; however, for a quick start it is usually ok. In this case I accept it as accurate: "Tantra fully developed Gupta period" 320 - 550 CE. Many if not most Scholars would probably accept around 1400 BC as a good date for the compilation of the Rig Veda; with, oral transmission prior to that. I am of course using a "Westerners" sense of time which is Chronological and Aristotelian; which also, I assume these two Western halfwits are using also.

  • @97448able Please do some research before pontificating on these things as matter of fact. You are commenting with half-knowledge which is far more dangerous than no knowledge at all. For instance, the MahabhArat war took place in 3138 BCE. At that time, the Vedas were already considered "ancient". How can the Rig Veda be composed around 1500 BCE if they were considered ancient in 3138BCE? Do yourself a favor and read some real Indian history by INDIAN historians, not some euro-trash.

  • @MahaVakyas It is true I started with Western Scholars. It has only been recently that I have begun to find superb present day Indian Scholars...primarily at the Universities (many Western).

    You can transpose historical dates all you want. You can modify history with the most vain-glorious fantasy all you want...won't change a thing.

    I don't need to be lectured by you about anything.

    The motivation and intent behind this nonsense is becoming increasingly obvious.

    Did not originate India.

  • @MahaVakyas Yea everyone is Hindu now? Read your vedas, full of sexism, misogyny and retarded thinking. 

  • @shadowsburnme read your quran you pedophile worshiping untouchable.. full of murder, mayhem, pedophilia, and genocide.. after all, what else can be expected of untouchable filth like you.. poor PISSlamic scum..

  • HINDUISM THE TRUTH

  • nalanda university of india was distroyed by Muslim invaders....they burned all books the fire lasted for 20 years...can you think of the amount of knowledge they distroyed.

  • @abksharma : It lasted for 3 months not 20 years...

  • Respond to this video...

  • Dont confuse and twist the truth.Prakrit is the spoken language and not purified like Sanskrit.

    See,the Prakrita against Samskrita, which means purified and perfect.

    Slavians are ancient migration out of India and their cultural linkages were lost over the time.

    They are in the forefront of spreading Semitic religion.Most of Slavains were always in the forefront to destroy Aryan roots!

    Most Pathetic souls!

  • Sanskrit was derived from old Prakrit, which was in fact old Slavic language

  • maxillusionist is well named. It was not the Romans who began the trade on ignorance...but whole lineages of greek priests/nobles. Hmmmm...there is an entire class of Greek poetry and commentary that was expunged for a reason.

    The reason that ancient greek and veda a very close is that the greek form was predicated on the vedic forms.

    Do not underestimate Greeks (for they were just as good at burning knowledge as the Romans)... just go...go further back...go further back still.

  • DONT UNDERESTIMATE GREEKS.. trilions of wars where there..at those times.. So what if Nallanda had first university 450BC? greeks had academy before that time with Plato, Socrat, Aristotel, Aleksandar.. and later in Roman times and inventions of hebrews on the places where we should see greeks... all those greeks dissapeared...by propaganda.. things stolen by Romans.. Religion saved in Christ (Krishna).. Hindu & greeks are both great and very close in languages/religion...

  • The more I know About THE BEST RELIGION THE MORE I PROUD TO CALL MYSELF A HUMAN thus A TRUE HINDU...GOD BLESS THOSE PEOPLE WHO APPRECIATE THIS GLORIOUS RELIGION AND IT'S GREAT TEACHINGS no matter what religion they belong to..

  • they are thinking of writing computer languages in Sanskrit because of it's mathematical precision and patterned construction of expressions which will make programs easier to comprehend plus debugging will be lot quicker...

    Some also claim Sanskrit is a language of advanced alien race..which left this earth long ago..Latin and Sanskrit were sister languages they say..sanskrit was the language of the elite group whereas latin was the language of subjugated alien groups.

    the story Maybe false..

  • The interviewe asked a question about 'advaita' tradition. May I share a few thoughts here?

    'Dvaitam' means 'dual.' The world is generally dual: black and white, happiness and sorrow, etc. 'Advaitam' is antonym to 'dvaita'; meaning non-dual.

    Spiritually inclined people pursue 'advaitam.' They are neither happy nor sorrow; they try to be even tempered (equanimity). Hardly anything bothers them, and anything excites them. Yet they are in spiritual bliss always, as they live in present.

  • Use Advaita/Dvaita as a beginning and go further on your own. There are experiences/states/levels which cannot be verbalized. After a certain there is nothing to prove and judge

  • No Mr. Dean, 'science' as both proper organization of data and 'science' as that which may be logically applied to produce an affect in reality.

    Oppenheimer understood the 'dance of shakti (sp?)', Tesla understood Akasha, Prana and luminitherous ether.

    The Vedas are, quite literally, High Science.

  • May be it is the western view of upanishads, "atma is not equal to brahma, but a part of brahma, or may be a reflection of a part of brahma" is also tought in India. Atma is like a reflection in the mirror where the quality of image is proportional to the quality of the mirror, hence stating atma = brahma may be mostly wrong,

  • Nobody says the pagans didnt have a wholistic view of reality. they just arent monotheist. they dont worship just G-d the creator. but they also worship the polytheistic emanations of g-d. This is the definition of idolatry. This is how one loses awareness of the simple oneness of G-d.

  • @MegaJoshin Hindu goes much higher and deeper than the simplistic monotheist explanation of modern religions (which was required based on the initial people they were intended for - tribes). Listen to the video again and explore "Advaita" which is beyond normal human consciousness, but it will be a start. Wish you a Good Journy

  • @rawalprash Advaita, though I'm a Carvaka Atheist, is insufficient (as an idea or thought or explanation) to me. Single reason being - it professes the possibility of Salvation/ Moksha in present life, which- supposing- all that talk of Brahman (not 2 b confusd with Brahmin or Lord Brahma), soul, consciousness, etc. is true, makes no sense to my intellect. Dvaita makes an even bigger no-sense, but at least rejects attainability of Moksha in this life.

  • जीव दुःखेन विना - can anyone translate this for me? thanks

  • @spinksboi जीव दुःखेन विना = Life without Sorrows

    Im not 100% sure as its marathi not hindi or sanskrit.

  • @ace41r

    much appreciated. I was trying to get get "live without regret" in sanskrit writing, is there any reliable sources that you know of that i could get it, if of course you cant do it yourself.

    thanks

  • @spinksboi I dont think there's any ancient indian script titled life without regrets, it might be some recent book from 18/19th century written in hindi. If you are seriously interested there is an ancient scriptures bookshop in my city, i'll check and tell if there is a book matching the title. Try to be well versed in sanskrit if you need to know the real interpretations of such books, the english translations available now are totally wrong.

  • @ace41r

    you've been a major help, thanks.

    do you know if there is any script that does not not translate literally but encaptures the same meaning, living life free from inner quarrels and regret?

  • @spinksboi Bhagavat geeta is the best option available to you, there are lots of shorter versions just about "living life without regret and sorrows" varying from 50 pages - 300 page books locally available here but those are in local language (malayalam) only. But after reading it, i found that those are just few parts explained from bhagavat geeta, and i think there's a reasonably well translated version of geeta available in english online (but are very long, but worth reading).

  • @ace41r

    i may need further help after more research but you have been amazing, thanks very much

  • can you read either of these? if so are they actually sanskrit or another type of script, thanks again

    महत्त्वाकाङ्क्षया सह

    विषादेन विना

  • @spinksboi this is sanskrit, but i dont know the meaning.

  • Comment removed

  • @spinksboi It means something like

    "Along with ambitions there should not be dejection*" (simply: where there is ambition there should be no giving up)

    *I dont know if its the exact word in english, here it means "depression"

    eg: Suppose you want to be a pilot and its hard to get there and on the way you get depressed coz its hard to make it or feel like giving up.

    It depends on the context, it can be interpreted in around 2 ways based on the context. Sanskrit grammar is tough !! + im a newbie

  • @ace41r

    Thats what i wanted to hear though, i was trying to say something in the context of live with ambition in your life, follow them, महत्त्वाकाङ्क्षया सह, would you say that this is the right context to have this script?

  • @spinksboi Yes

  • @spinksboi I studied sanskrit for 4 yrs..............last two words mean without any problems/worries..........firs­t word means something related to importance........second word means 'with'.........can't tell you the exact meaning of the sentence and I might be wrong but its close to the tattoo you wanna get :P.......My Mom is a sanskrit teacher.......but she's in India otherwise I could've helped......

  • @foonty that helps alot thanks

  • @spinksboi you'll say it like

    " Mahatvakanshya sah, vishaden vinaa"

  • @foonty

    hi is there any way to translate this जेमी स्पिंक्स letter for letter rather than as a word?

  • @spinksboi you wrote it correctly......

  • @foonty excellent Thanks!

  • @spinksboi goodluck.....I watched a video of a guy having a sanskrit tattoo , telling people that its sand script........haha.......and theres another woman who's got a tattoo saying "yoga" which makes no sense......it good that you are getting one with your name.........

  • @spinksboi the first one may mean "with ambitions" and second may mean "without sorrow"

    pronounciation is

    1 = Mahatwakanksaya saha

    2 = Wishaden wina

  • @spinksboi it says : mahattvâkânksayâ saha, vishâdena vinâ. But i don't understand all the words, it's something like : with a great (word unknown), without despair/weakness.

    The script is called Devanagari, and it is used to write Sanskrit and Hindi, although it only exists 800 years. In earlier times other scripts were used to write Sanskrit, but most of all, Sanskrit traditions were orally preserved.

  • @spinksboi It's hindi. Sanskrit writings don't have the horizontal line on top, although the letters are almost same.

  • @spinksboi Yes, without the horizontal line.

  • @spinksboi Looks like the Devanagari script, but I can't translate, hehe

  • @spinksboi The one u mention above is a kind of phrase in sanskrit. It means like the person with out ambition is like the poison-less snake.

  • @spinksboi  The one u mention above is a kind of phrase in sanskrit. It means like the person with out ambition is like the poison-less snake.

  • @ace41r

    hi is there any way to translate this जेमी स्पिंक्स letter for letter rather than as a word, its menat to be my name

  • @spinksboi here are the sounds it makes

    जे= sounds "Jay" sounds similar to English "J"

    मी = "me"

    So it must be Jamie

    स्पिं = "Spe" as in 'species' + watch the dot on above the letter 'pa', it denotes the "n" sound

    क्स = "ks"

    Closer resemblance to an english name = Spinks

    Your name is Jamie Spinks?

  • @ace41r

    Amazing, thank you so much!

  • @spinksboi btw, if u have any doubt, try to pm me instead of commenting here coz i dont have any alerts set for comments. btw whats with your obsession with sanskrit ? lol

  • @spinksboi

    I am planning to get an 'Aham Brahamasmi' tatt......look for its meaning....you might like that......

  • Comment removed

  • tamil is older than sanskrit

  • i was literally crying seeing this video. i am so proud that i am born in india.

  • Panini, ancient Indian Sanskrit grammarian and Paganini, the great Italian violin virtuoso, notice how similar sounding name they have.

  • Poor host. he seems genuinely interested in learning about the language and its mysticism, and yet the guest repeatedly avoids those aspects of the language/culture. Westerners (( Damn, he puts me to sleep

  • The vedas are the greatest religious scriptures ever written!!!!

  • .Why Rigveda age is pushed back 6000BC or above.

  • calculus , is actually from india.. they have just given it a european name

    an a lot many other things, the stupid europeans consider as their own

  • @nrittam, Relativity was known years before Einstein was born, still he is credited because he was the first to establish it properly. Europeans built entire industries using calculus, they brought in the modern world, the credit goes to them. I'm Indian, but that does not mean I will be blind to reality.

  • @nrittam Racist scum.

  • received a comment

    "did ur wife cheat on u with a greek man?"

    I am south indian, dark, and with a so called "roman" nose. . most gals i have been with, consider fair skinned guys as 'effeminate"

    Talk about the "tanned" guy..

    And anyway's , aren't greeks mostly gay's ?

    Talk about a culture which counted I II III IV etc

  • received a comment

    "did ur wife cheat on u with a greek man?"

    I am south indian, dark, and with a so called "roman" nose. . most gals i have been with, consider fair skinned guys as 'effeminate"

    Talk about the "tanned" guy..

    And anyway's , aren't greeks mostly gay's ?

    Talk about a culture which counted I II III IV etc

  • Jaya Prabhupada!

  • @nrittam YOu sad loser! Islam will bite you in the arse then you will learn to respect India!

  • wait.. i forgot to mention. the famous 'pythogorean theorem"..

    A lot many culutures knew of this..

    But hey. a greek( Or roman or whatever shit he was ), came to india, and took the learning back..

    And he is hailed. Hail hitler.. Hail the "white race"

  • bitter much? did ur wife cheat on u with a greek man? if not then where does your jealous hatred of greco-romans come from? maybe because your country is a polluted, overpopulated shithole. that would explain it.

  • bloody stupid greek culture .. where do you think the decimal system / algebra came from.. ?

    Let me guess. some white man taught the indians decimal system, algebra , calculus, .. and oh.. some white man actually discovered the planetary laws of motion

    And oh.. south indians, dark skinned, do have roman/greek noses and facial features

    damn shit.. alexander must have screwed a million south indian ( dravidian ) women , to make this genetic change..

  • This is where Greek culture comes from.What do you think alexander was looking for when he went to Afghanistan and Bactria and down the Indus.

    Yes he wanted to destroy Persia,but Aristotle and Alexanders mother both told him that his ancestors came from those mountains.Why do you think Indians have the R1a and R1B gene in such great quantity in Northwest area of India.Old English Faeder,Latin Pater,Greek Pater,Sanskrit pita all mean father.

    It goes on and on.

  • yeah, why do you think alexander lost ?... and why do you think everyone in europe wanted to come to india

    India had the first universities in the world.. people from all around the world used to come to india, to learn philosophy ( aka religion ), mathematics, astrology , linguistics

    Oh my gawd.. tanned people teaching the whites ? Cant be true

  • Sanskirt is the mother of all european languages.. Indo-european = Indo

    The europeans still have to come to terms with the fact that most of their 'beloved' things originate from a non-white race... the romans/greeks were truly one of the finest early civilizations in the world.. how can any non-white race equal them ? Let alone surpass them

    talk about genes.. could it be that the genes went the other way around ? oh my gawd.. no shit..

  • Sanskrit is analogous to Latin and Ancient Greek - all are daughter languages derived from Proto-Indo-European, a hypothesized mother language. Sanskrit is not the mother language, but a very old daughter language.

    We should not let the issue get politicised though. Virtually all cultures, whatever shade of skin colour, have long and venerable traditions. :)

  • Skin color proves nothing and changes quickly after some generations.

    There is no races,there is ethnology's,and indians have the same ethnology as the europeans.

    Resuming we are all descendants from very ancient Indians that departed,we were once the very same people.

    Hope India keep Sanskrit alive,its the most important european heritage.

  • Far from being Freemasons... this is orthodox Vedic knowledge, also known as Vedanta... search Vivekananda, Sivananda and Chinmayanada to learn more... :)

  • great

  • Dance of shakti is Tandav

  • So, this is not a good video to watch to learn about sanskrit ?

  • "The route to the Divine is through the Atman"

    I AM is the way.

  • The guy on the left is really death-dealing.

  • Ok that 40 second "break" was just bullshit

  • come on you all are too harsh on this guy, and guessing this was filmed in the 80s there just putting it out for people who don't know, i'm sure he means well

  • nah it was filmed in the 2000s

  • I like how the moderator answers his own questions. A bit too smug...then again, the guest isn't the most dynamic speaker.

    om namah shivaya

  • SANSKRIT is a first formal natural[prakritc]language.

  • The Bhagavad Gita Upanishads, Vedic Scriptures were written 5000 years ago- (3150 BC)- if U type first Greek writings(Google)links provide info:1rst Greek writings:9th Century BC.

    Nallanda University in India is 1rstUniversity-450 BCE over 60 subjects were taught&10,000 students studied then- the site of University is still in existence.

    Geometry is word derived from Sanskrit: Giamiti,Trigonometry frm word:Trikonomati.

    SCHOLARS explain if u type trigonometry Sanskrit word in Google.

  • greek culture is derived from sanskrit culture.. well atleast that's what the experts say these days.

  • @BhanumyL wow.....so then i wonder...did Egypt derive the knowledge from inda or was it vice versa?

  • @elpanameno872 ...I have the same question and came across your comment...did you ever get an anwser on that?

  • @SuckaFreeSista1313 Well...i have come across information...that says that it all decended from the himalayas...its hard to say...it would require some research...and not wikipedia lol

  • @elpanameno872 ...LOL...good lookin' on the reply... ;0)

  • @SuckaFreeSista1313 Im sorry :( ....Well...we do know that egypt is very old...but the Indian books ..the vedas..speak of amazing things...such as Vimanas which can mean Flying chariot...they depict incredible wars ...which makes me think...that they are every ancient indeed.. one must look and see how old the vedas are...and compare them to the age of Earliest known Egyptian civilization..but you must also know, that there seem to be inconsistensies in the dating of the Sphinx. better? lol

  • @elpanameno872 ...oh no-no-no...I was really thanking you...forgive me if I came across wrong. Thank you so much for giving me more info... =0) Hope your day is beautiful.

  • @SuckaFreeSista1313 haha ok ok i misunderstood lol. ok thats good then! yah u have a great day too! :)

  • @BhanumyL very interesting!

  • awesome

  • And this guy's pronunciation sucks. But whatever, he's knowledgeable.

  • aham brahmAsmi

    tattvamasi

  • Atman equals Brahman. I AM GOD

  • yes you are God in quality but not in quantity so God is great we are minute that why in Bible say we are made as his Immagine

  • Are you saying linguistics is not a science? Or the statement makes you think that one needs to be a specialist in linguistics for one to read upanishads and do a commentary on Sanskrit...Because linguists are blinded with their PIE hypothesis and the comparative methodology...so whom does one turn to?

  • sorry foe the repitation ... missed out on some sentences

  • A highly KNOWLADGE able interview. But some Vedic concepts r not understood

    The access to the Paramathman ( devas =panchaboothas =the receptors of sences ,as he calls it ) Cannot be through the senses. as mentioned by the learned scholar. It is only when one discards the" Indriyas = sences "The Paramathman or the Allmighty .which is Sate of NOTHINGNESS can be understood , this CAN NOT be comprehended by the senses. The Video reflects the difference between scholarly knowledge and Gyana

  • A highly KNOWLADGE able interview. But some concepts r not understood

    The access to the Paramathman ( devas =panchaboothas =the receptors of sences ,as he calls it ) Cannot be through the senses. as mentioned by the learned scholar. It is only when one discards the" Indriyas = sences "The Paramathman or the Allmighty .which is Sate of  NOTHINGNESS, CAN NOT be comprehended by the senses. The Video reflects the difference between scholarly knowledge and Gyana .

  • It should be reffered to as Vedic mantra or Vedic shloka.

  • What u r referring to is the Vedic tradition , Sanskrit is a language a v v refined version of the ancient then existing languages prakrith, pali, paishacha , margadi ardha margadi Brami to name a few . Sanskrit means, " refined "the refined version of all these languages .. AND the Vedas r NOT in Sanskrit ,... it was in Veda Bashya.which is very close to the above mentioned languages. So it would be improper to call ,"Sanskrit" MANTRA or Shloka .

  • With all due respect to the Vedic scholar, I forward my opinion

  • upanishads are like fractals... as we are a minimal part of the universe, we have the complete universe in our mind again... and so it goes on...

  • Could anyone plz explain to me, how come the word "mahi" in (ancient)Persian(wich means fish), has the same meaning in the native Hawaiian language? I mean, those tribes arent exactly neighbours..

  • a persian fish swam over the oceans and when the hawaiians catched it it said I am a dead mahi

  • dispersion theory...

    isolationism is a very backward archeological theory... basically people had boats and land bridges. There is alot of evidence to prove that they were in contact with each other in ancient times..

  • Gentleman, you cannot prove something just by giving some logics. go to the facts.

    I strongly disagree with you.

    Sanskrit is the oldest Language of the world and Greece owe too much from India..for example. mathematics

  • Gentleman.i can understand your feeling and your patriotism, its good. but do not ignore the fact.

    Indus civilization is the worlds oldest civilization and so is sanskrit.

  • I don't know what the hell this Mr. SACRAMBORTY has told you ..i never heard his name. My friend don't stick with only one person ..if you wanna find truth go to different views and then conclude.

  • I haven't heard "adva-eeta" before.

  • its a-dvaita non-dual..

  • I understand that, 'a' being the prohibitive particle and dvaita a participle(?) of "dva" (two). I should be more clear, his pronunciation is peculiar to me. I would pronounce it "ad-vai-ta". I consider the "ai" a single long vowel like "e" and "au".

  • postman has excellent videos. check out "scientific verifaction of hinduism"...

  • tvam tat_ i am that. i am of the infinite.

    sa aham_ that is me. the eternal spirit soul

  • they ain't pronouncing the terms correctly

  • @buzzin1975 thats bcos sanskrit has a lot of hard and soft consonents, even current regional languages in India have them. where as english most of them use hard consonents, so they tend to pronounce wrongly.

  • atman = brahman hmmm

  • india is a mystery

  • mystery can be learned

  • not learned but explored

  • sorry if i am nt with u bt u cant explore the so called mistery. there are nlu simple concets that can be practised/learned

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more