@MrYoungEarth nop! not faith, you just need study. Is because the lack of study you don't understand it, oh.. but of course, It's way more easy to believe in just one book that you dont even read entirely, and skip the study and say "this requires to much faith for me" don´t you think?
This video explains the origen of life, and the FACT of evolution in a very short and simplist form. But again, if you want to understand it, yo should read a lot.
@swlovesvegans Nop. Talk to any Biochemical and you'll see evolution is a checked biologial fact, proven in bacterias, ATB resistance is the simplest expample, talk to any veterinarian and you'll see that a chihuahua is the best example of manipulated evolution, talk to any genetist and you'll see tha THE BEST PROOF of evolution is the fact we have 23 pairs of cromosomes, and chimps have 24, why? our 2° cromosome is the summation of 2 diferent cromosomes in chimps. Come on, grow up! wake up
@naxins the number of chromosomes in a monkey is supposed to convince me that our DNA, the code to everything in our body, the perfect formation of the earth, to the sun, moon and other planets, that our 200 different types of cells in our body with different functions so intricate its puts any computer every made by the intelligent mind of man to shame. come on, i need something better then that to look past my "ignorance"
@swlovesvegans all this things are proved, if you still believe is a mith you need to study... of course it's way more easy to sit and say "need faith" rather than pick a book and STUDY for once in your life don't you think?
I mean, come one, at least read wikipedia XD! even in there is all you need.
Say that evolution is not proven is a monstrous fallacy from ignorance, due to the lack of information and proof rejection.
@naxins who said it wasnt proven. why do you think i'm on this video? to respond to comments? i'm looking for the evidence. but all i seem to find is theory after theory
@swlovesvegans but you coment on this video, then expect responses like this. You are denying the evidence, you say you are looking for an "acurrate" answer, you get one and you don't know how to discern if it is true or false, that's the point, you could be in front of the truth, and because something (idk what) you reject it!
@naxins your links dont work. can you just give the name? also what about the cambrian "explosion" doesnt that go completely against everything that evolution is. More then half of all major divisions of animal life seem to have appeared in a short period of time, compared to the billions of years before it. dont get me wrong, i'm not a creationist. i dont believe the 7-days were 24 hours. but so many new and distinct life forms appear so suddenly. plus, evolution has such a weak foundation.
@swlovesvegans just take a link and add it after youtube.com/anylinkigivetoyou... And 2°, by the moment you begin to adapt the things from a book that were literal once, avery argument based on that book becomes weak. And religion, since its creation, is only "adapting" to the wrowing knowledgement, trying first to denigrate the evidence, then adapt it to their beliefs, but after too many many years. About the cambric, there are many theorys. im not a paleonthologyst, but i believe in them.
@swlovesvegans ok, with the cambric period. When you have a vast, fertile land, with no life forms (due to an other previous massive extinction, for exampre) you'll see a great variety of life forms, this happens even this days in a reduced scale.. "i don't think so, don't buy it" you'll say...Pleas read about the biodiversity in any island, and how it fits with the theorys. Juan fernandes, Galapagos, Haway, etc.
@swlovesvegans becaouse this islands are relatively young in the hearth history, the evolution rate is ridiculous, therefore is no place to the natural selection yet. Maybe, for your ayes, evolution in this islands is still not watchable, but is demonstrable genetically and anatomically. The cambric period is just the same in a greater scale. There were no time, no space and no condition for natural selection like today, there were no such competitons, such envromental limitations.
@naxins okay so before this period, the billions of years, fertile land formed, and when it became more fertile, we had a sudden burst of evolution, then the burst stopped because of competitions and enviromental limitations?
@swlovesvegans you need a lot more than a vas fertile land XD... you need oxigen in the water, an atmosphere, a low stable temperature... when we reach that we get cabric period, 70 millions years... you think is a short time?. The evolution never stops, keep looking, even in the news every year "500 new species founded", come on, look at your dog, every domestic dog, every plant you eat is proof of natural selection by our hands...
@naxins no 70 million years isnt in my eyes, but compared to before it, yes. but i get what your saying. i get you. i honestly try to put what ive been taught aside, because then i understand better.
@swlovesvegans first you get a boom in the species pool (no competition yet), then when the food decreases and the ecological niche is reduces more and more for every specie, the natural selection take the principal role, the "once successful" are in competition, the evolution rate is the same, but the natural selection reduce the chances for this species to keep in time. And again, say that evolution has weak foundation is an enourmous fallacy, again from ignorance and evidence rejection.
@naxins well its only expected for you to say that, i mean Dawkins himself said "It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane." but lets be real. all ignorance a side, the probability of RNA and protein appearing in the same place at the same time to form a self sustaining self replicating living cell has been calculated to 1 chance in a million billion.
there you got something, very simple, but short and presice, now, can you give me some evidence agains evolution?. Every "proof" againt evolution i've seen is fallacius, again, from ignorance and denial of evidence.
@naxins quick question.. not ignorant question liget question. Protein, was the first building block to appear in evolutions theory correct? and do evolutionist still follow the concept of the "tree of life?"
@swlovesvegans nop, not proteins, proteins are too complex. It starts with a ¿dual layer? (bicapa in spanish, english is not my native language) of phospholipids.
@naxins well, lets be real, the bible says a day to God is like a thousand years. it also said that we are still living in the day of rest. so its obviously not 24 hours. WHO CARES THOUGH right:) sorry i dont want to rant and preach. dawkins tree of life. all came from one, but i guess all evolutionist believe that so it was a stupid question. sorry no protein, i meant amino acid. okay. i'll look into that. thankyou much
@swlovesvegans you are welcome! i'm happy to help any one who ask :D. Try to read Darwin, Lamarck, an dawkins, those are theorys, of course, if you want facts, read about embriology, compared anatomy, dogs, cats, islands biodiversity, even the common corn!!!! the proofs are there, it's just take a lot ( A LOT) of time. and don't be afraid to ask! Bye!
try to see an embriology book, a zoology book, a comparatative anatomy book, come on, don't you see that you believe what you believe just because someone told you to do thant? man, im worried for you. Try to study and think for yourself.
@MrYoungEarth I suppose it's easy to sit there and say that, but do you actually have the scientific knowledge/done research enough to have an informed opinion? I know I haven't.
this requires too much faith for me
MrYoungEarth 5 months ago
@MrYoungEarth nop! not faith, you just need study. Is because the lack of study you don't understand it, oh.. but of course, It's way more easy to believe in just one book that you dont even read entirely, and skip the study and say "this requires to much faith for me" don´t you think?
This video explains the origen of life, and the FACT of evolution in a very short and simplist form. But again, if you want to understand it, yo should read a lot.
naxins 4 months ago in playlist Más vídeos de TheReasonParty
@naxins faith is the assured expectation of things though not beheld. no one beheld the evolution. hence, it takes faith to believe it happened
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans Nop. Talk to any Biochemical and you'll see evolution is a checked biologial fact, proven in bacterias, ATB resistance is the simplest expample, talk to any veterinarian and you'll see that a chihuahua is the best example of manipulated evolution, talk to any genetist and you'll see tha THE BEST PROOF of evolution is the fact we have 23 pairs of cromosomes, and chimps have 24, why? our 2° cromosome is the summation of 2 diferent cromosomes in chimps. Come on, grow up! wake up
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins the number of chromosomes in a monkey is supposed to convince me that our DNA, the code to everything in our body, the perfect formation of the earth, to the sun, moon and other planets, that our 200 different types of cells in our body with different functions so intricate its puts any computer every made by the intelligent mind of man to shame. come on, i need something better then that to look past my "ignorance"
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans all this things are proved, if you still believe is a mith you need to study... of course it's way more easy to sit and say "need faith" rather than pick a book and STUDY for once in your life don't you think?
I mean, come one, at least read wikipedia XD! even in there is all you need.
Say that evolution is not proven is a monstrous fallacy from ignorance, due to the lack of information and proof rejection.
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins who said it wasnt proven. why do you think i'm on this video? to respond to comments? i'm looking for the evidence. but all i seem to find is theory after theory
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans but you coment on this video, then expect responses like this. You are denying the evidence, you say you are looking for an "acurrate" answer, you get one and you don't know how to discern if it is true or false, that's the point, you could be in front of the truth, and because something (idk what) you reject it!
watch?v=kyJkT4M7wfs&feature=feedrec_grec_index
watch?v=eoyYNNE20TI&feature=mh_lolz&list=FL1dJBpKuqZLjoVJj7EMPIWA
watch?v=i1fGkFuHIu0
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins your links dont work. can you just give the name? also what about the cambrian "explosion" doesnt that go completely against everything that evolution is. More then half of all major divisions of animal life seem to have appeared in a short period of time, compared to the billions of years before it. dont get me wrong, i'm not a creationist. i dont believe the 7-days were 24 hours. but so many new and distinct life forms appear so suddenly. plus, evolution has such a weak foundation.
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans just take a link and add it after youtube.com/anylinkigivetoyou... And 2°, by the moment you begin to adapt the things from a book that were literal once, avery argument based on that book becomes weak. And religion, since its creation, is only "adapting" to the wrowing knowledgement, trying first to denigrate the evidence, then adapt it to their beliefs, but after too many many years. About the cambric, there are many theorys. im not a paleonthologyst, but i believe in them.
naxins 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans ok, with the cambric period. When you have a vast, fertile land, with no life forms (due to an other previous massive extinction, for exampre) you'll see a great variety of life forms, this happens even this days in a reduced scale.. "i don't think so, don't buy it" you'll say...Pleas read about the biodiversity in any island, and how it fits with the theorys. Juan fernandes, Galapagos, Haway, etc.
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins no, no, no.. i wont say that. i very much appreciate you looking it up and giving me an answer. good quality you have:) thankyou very much
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans becaouse this islands are relatively young in the hearth history, the evolution rate is ridiculous, therefore is no place to the natural selection yet. Maybe, for your ayes, evolution in this islands is still not watchable, but is demonstrable genetically and anatomically. The cambric period is just the same in a greater scale. There were no time, no space and no condition for natural selection like today, there were no such competitons, such envromental limitations.
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins okay so before this period, the billions of years, fertile land formed, and when it became more fertile, we had a sudden burst of evolution, then the burst stopped because of competitions and enviromental limitations?
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans you need a lot more than a vas fertile land XD... you need oxigen in the water, an atmosphere, a low stable temperature... when we reach that we get cabric period, 70 millions years... you think is a short time?. The evolution never stops, keep looking, even in the news every year "500 new species founded", come on, look at your dog, every domestic dog, every plant you eat is proof of natural selection by our hands...
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins no 70 million years isnt in my eyes, but compared to before it, yes. but i get what your saying. i get you. i honestly try to put what ive been taught aside, because then i understand better.
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans first you get a boom in the species pool (no competition yet), then when the food decreases and the ecological niche is reduces more and more for every specie, the natural selection take the principal role, the "once successful" are in competition, the evolution rate is the same, but the natural selection reduce the chances for this species to keep in time. And again, say that evolution has weak foundation is an enourmous fallacy, again from ignorance and evidence rejection.
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins well its only expected for you to say that, i mean Dawkins himself said "It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane." but lets be real. all ignorance a side, the probability of RNA and protein appearing in the same place at the same time to form a self sustaining self replicating living cell has been calculated to 1 chance in a million billion.
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans /watch?v=9V_2r2n4b5c&list=LL1dJBpKuqZLjoVJj7EMPIWA&index=76
watch?v=uZyNEqq6I3A&list=LL1dJBpKuqZLjoVJj7EMPIWA&index=74
there you got something, very simple, but short and presice, now, can you give me some evidence agains evolution?. Every "proof" againt evolution i've seen is fallacius, again, from ignorance and denial of evidence.
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins thankyou
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@naxins quick question.. not ignorant question liget question. Protein, was the first building block to appear in evolutions theory correct? and do evolutionist still follow the concept of the "tree of life?"
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans nop, not proteins, proteins are too complex. It starts with a ¿dual layer? (bicapa in spanish, english is not my native language) of phospholipids.
I don't know what you mean by "tree of life"
naxins 4 months ago
@naxins well, lets be real, the bible says a day to God is like a thousand years. it also said that we are still living in the day of rest. so its obviously not 24 hours. WHO CARES THOUGH right:) sorry i dont want to rant and preach. dawkins tree of life. all came from one, but i guess all evolutionist believe that so it was a stupid question. sorry no protein, i meant amino acid. okay. i'll look into that. thankyou much
swlovesvegans 4 months ago
@swlovesvegans you are welcome! i'm happy to help any one who ask :D. Try to read Darwin, Lamarck, an dawkins, those are theorys, of course, if you want facts, read about embriology, compared anatomy, dogs, cats, islands biodiversity, even the common corn!!!! the proofs are there, it's just take a lot ( A LOT) of time. and don't be afraid to ask! Bye!
naxins 4 months ago
try to see an embriology book, a zoology book, a comparatative anatomy book, come on, don't you see that you believe what you believe just because someone told you to do thant? man, im worried for you. Try to study and think for yourself.
naxins 4 months ago in playlist Más vídeos de TheReasonParty
@MrYoungEarth I suppose it's easy to sit there and say that, but do you actually have the scientific knowledge/done research enough to have an informed opinion? I know I haven't.
eggertstwart 1 week ago
Be nice to have evidence other than graphics fabricated from intelligent life form set to pretty music.
AlainSta60 5 months ago
@AlainSta60
Evidence is in the genetic data, and abiogenesis research.
Scientists have almost pinpointed the beginning of life on earth.
NeutralExistence 3 months ago
@AlainSta60 Not the point of this video. If you want to read about the supposed evidence, (and I mean that implying nothing) look elsewhere.
eggertstwart 1 week ago
fuck you darwin
yasamin08 11 months ago
really??!!
unkhl3 11 months ago 17
This has been flagged as spam show
@unkhl3 yes really dumb arse!
MrDasmaster 4 months ago