Added: 2 years ago
From: TheAmazingAtheist
Views: 134,740
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,855)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1:40-2:23 I'm not gonna be able to keep up with this, am I? @_@

  • WHATEVER BEGINS TO EXIST. Not "stuff that exist".

  • Using Theist Logic: We smelled a fart and no one else knew where it came from. Does this mean that it created itself God is a Fart?

  • "Some thing that we dont yet understand." sounds familiar.Some thing like God ?

  • @WarWhoYoungManSSSS No. Something like something, not a magical bearded asshole. WE DON'T KNOW doesn't mean God, dickless. You fail.

  • @tikifreakazoid its not an bearded asshole like ,the guy that raped you, its a power WE DONT UNDERSTAND !your raped YOU FAIL

  • It winds me up SO FUCKING MUCH. Their experience is "6 days a week: don't think. Sunday: Pretend to learn some sheltered, impossible, misrepresented, suspiciously simple gibberish from a millionaire like Peter Popoff or Ted Shitchute Haggard.".

    How Peter Popoff still has a career after what happened on what? One of the most popular shows in US history just bewilders me.

  • There was some twat who called into The Atheist Experience saying that he could prove that Christianity is true. He started mindlessly reading out this argument.

    The presenter said "Even if that's true, how do you get from there to Christianity?" and the caller said "Well, after we find out there is a God we also find out that Christianity is the only religion that makes sense.". The argument for Christianity, he got from Ted Haggard.

  • @Jex64 umm, what?

  • this argument kind of sounds like Thomas of Aquino, the medieval filosofer...

  • If there was infinite regression of causes, couldn't that equally show that the universe ALWAYS existed, as well as never was created?

  • And ofcourse claiming "random coherence" like the atheist does is absurd. Randomness is white noise. Intelligent design is coherence. Removing that, the atheist claims randomness instead, which is incoherence. Incoherent design = incoherence between numbers = white noise. Not the ordered universe you see. In no way can intelligent design, or nonrandomness enter the argument of the atheist. So later claiming natural selection for instance after random whitennoise generated consciousness, is .. ;)

  • @ParadoxEternal Friendly question for you : ) how can any god create themself? If cause is needed.Also infinity can exist, look at it like a book.Someone writes the book how he wants it, You would say the guy that create the book is the beginning cause he doesn't need a cause to write it but in a sense you have to look back more.Something or someone gave that cause in the first place not himself.Leave out the hate, Just put your answer : )

  • @a084123 I don`t know, and understand how atheists think. I have talked quite a bit to them, but they fail to realize simple truths. Maybe they mess up the first eternal transcendent cause, with a material cause and so forth. God is ofcourse not an idol, but transcendent being. And the only real being. You DO notice that everyone has the same nature right? And even communication requires "same protocol" aka the divine soul. Which is "gods image". How can you look away from all this?

  • @ParadoxEternal Everything you said is complete nonsense. You're claiming speech requires 'same protocol' what ever the fuck that means, then you equate this 'same protocol' with 'divine soul' and then with 'gods image'. This is not a 'simple truth' this is incoherent babble. Gorillas can communicate with sign language, are you claiming they have a divine soul? Everyone has the same nature? Again wtf does that mean? if you mean we are all human, ok that has no connection to souls

  • @Slanguaj Should be easy to understand but you didn`t. Gorillas also has divine soul. Infact you can understand the gorilla if you think it is you sitting there, probably wanting food, or is bored I don`t know. lol. Even the worm is you, or even smaller things. The nature of life is universal. Not only is an absolute required for coherence, both of creation, and of communication, but it should be evident, that physical shape, have nothing to do with why all life loves kindness.

  • @ParadoxEternal No it's not easy to understand because it makes no sense. You're just using buzzwords that have no distinct meaning to anyone but yourself. The nature of life is universal? You need to pick up a dictionary and look up nature.

    It's in some peoples nature to molest kids or kill people. All life on earth is made of the same basic components, but we don't all have the same morals. Good and bad aren't the same for all of us or every country would have the same laws

  • I'll grant you that all life has common traits, that is why we are able to define them under a single label. But you have no logical reason to conclude that the reason for those common traits is an undetectable soul, and there's even less reason to think that validates a god of some kind. I can follow what you're saying, but you're making completely unsupported claims that you believe for personal emotional reasons. You need to support these claims with evidence that we can all observe

  • @Slanguaj No being is naturally evil. And countries do evolve, and most have now democracy, and will iterate to perfection, where the divine human soul is the only source for law. This IS democracy. Generalities are strengthened, and deviance is filtered out. And people who grow up in abusive situations, or simply lack intelligence, become the deviant, the abusers, who ignore their good nature, and follow shaytan. And people who do so all their life, go to hell.

  • @ParadoxEternal You've given no evidence for the divine, a soul, shaytan or hell. Not only do your posts reveal a lack of logical thinking, but a lack of comprehension of the English language. Besides, we all know the spaghetti monster is the real god. I feel sorry for you because when you die you'll face him and you'll learn that your pitiful religion was actually made by the evil pasta-farian. It's so obvious and simple, I don't know how you don't get.

  • @Slanguaj You are the typical atheist bigot, and I have no interest of talking to you. Go to your atheist friends, who will soon enough grow up to whimper about meaninglessness and random objects of origin, and be medicated, and soon enough take satans dick in their ass, for their stupidity.

  • @ParadoxEternal Oooh, kinky. Didn't realize you're into that sort of thing. If you don't want to wait that long I could recommend some websites where you can watch gay butt sex right now. Since the thought of it satisfies you so much. But I have to warn you, the flying spaghetti monster doesn't agree with that form of entertainment and he might send you to pasta-farian to be tickled for all eternity.

  • @Slanguaj GOD however agrees completely. Satan is a lustfollower, and all his followers shall join him in hell. So buttsex is what you will be seeing, not me. As satans and his minions "love"-toy in hell. Hell for you, heaven for me :) Fair enough.

  • @ParadoxEternal Who's to say that you'll actually go to Heaven or Hell? Just because someone doesn't have your views on reality doesn't mean their afterlife will be any better or worse, should there actually be an afterlife. With so many religions promising Hell to non-believers, you're more than likely going to roast in Hell as there is no way of knowing which religion is the true religion, and the same goes for the god you worship.

  • @AdiG1 This is a question of, is there positive/negative consequence of morality. And any bafoon can understand that there is, so on some level these concepts MUST be accepted. and this is what all religion is about, and monotheism, and acknowledig realty. Even if you think religions are different, you have only looked at them superficially. If you look aside from the differences, that comes from distortions through time, they are basically the same. Peace!

  • @ParadoxEternal If you're talking about an aetherial consequence to morality (when we die, our souls are sent to [X]), then that can be looked upon as moronic. There are consequences for right/wrong behaviour but only in the confines of our life, say if you kill a child, you'll be incarcerated or given the death penalty (Depending on country). Not our death.

    Religions ARE different in many ways, from the practise to the worshipped god. The only similarity is they think other gods

  • @AdiG1 (cont.) don't exist.

  • @AdiG1 First of all, what is death. Moronic would be to make statements about that without knowledge. Now religions all state that their God/nongod(nonidol)/spirit/for­ce, regardless of name, is eternal, uncreated, allmighty, transcendent, and a moral and good compassionate being. And this is reported independently in all cultures and reliigons. Now why should I be wrong, and not you just paranoid?

  • @ParadoxEternal How many gods are there in this world? Including Norse gods, Egyption gods, etc. Who really knows which god is the "right" god? Who even knows if god even exists? I'm not paranoid for not believing in any god. I can't prove he doesn't exist as much as you can prove he does. However, there's a lot more evidence to suggest that the existance of a god is null and void.

  • @AdiG1 If all the religions of the world speak of the same god, then you are paranoid for not believeing in all those who state so, and even all their followers, who have varying levels of experience that this is true. You find them everywhere. Are ALL OF THESE lying to you? LOL. That would be absurd. Everyone lying about the same, independendtly of eachother. As for idols, they are distortions of religion. They are added, and is not present in the earliest religion Animism for instance.

  • @ParadoxEternal And was god ignorant that they'll eventually grow up in such abusive situations and follow "shaytan"?

    Why didn't god make their innate good nature stronger and less ignorable if we was aware it would lead them to hell?

    And once in hell, what would hell do to them and why would it matter for them to exist in this plane if they became deviant while in this one?

  • @Ebvardh Why this why that. Accept reality, and come to terms with it.

  • @ParadoxEternal Right back at you, mate.

  • @Ebvardh No, not "right back at you". You obviously have your mind filled with so much parasites, that you cannot understand even your own transcendence or that the world needs one. That is how it is with people who have little intelligence I guess. I mean REAL intellligence. I see people who can learn books, but still have little practical intelligence. Even children understand this. Something exists, and needs God. REALLY SIMPLE. All you++ did was convinced med atheists are mindless.

  • Comment removed

  • @ParadoxEternal Good you left out the anger.Now i'll tell you how i can look away from all this pretty easy.There are mosts of reason but for now lets go with this one.Someone or something creates himself from nothing meaning he must had a will to do so.So now he creates his own emoticons and thoughts and created the universe based off his thought and emoticons.Now he creates life based off his thoughts and now he cant control it.We look away to seek anwsers not claim we know.

  • @a084123 Your post is not making much sense. You seem not to understand eternity. It is not created.

  • @ParadoxEternal But if your christian god did exist then that would mean something and someone else willed it into existest and made a purpose for that god.For me its not just about my skin color being brown its why its brown how.The more you seek anwsers the closer you find truth, the more you think you know truth the less anwsers you'll have.Claiming and seeking are two different things : ).

  • @a084123 Same answer as above.

  • The argument really is simple. An infinite series cannot exist. Because it has no beginning, and therefore no series. Therefore infinity must be nothing. And where there is a series, it must be finite, and must have the transcendent infinite as the cause.

  • Dude that is gross with the hand and hair. Amazing atheist. Shouldn`t that be bonkers mad atheist? Man you are hilarous "it was goowd" LOL! Why not make a video of you puking on your sneakers! And stop saying "We dont know" Apparently others have more knowledge than you. And the wagging back and forth. Lol. The argument you think you have defeated you haven`t really understood apparently.

  • Isn't safe to say that creating matter and energy, is an act on matter and energy? Making Matt's point still valid?

  • I know it's been a while, but can you do a video on the design argument?

  • I think the argument for God being excempt from needing a cause is that he is Transcendent and exists outside of Time and Space, so they might say that everything existing within Time and Space needs a cause

  • @okamichamploo So our god is like living in an uber-universe wich caused the existence of him and at beer o'clock, after waching over insignificant little creatures (us), he is playing pool with the gods of the other universes who also do nothing than pretend to work in their uber-universe cubicles.

    PRAISE THE UBER-UNIVERSE!

  • The Amazing Atheist is Amazingly Annoying and Fat

  • @12esecrist HURR WITTY BRAH!

  • @12esecrist fun everytime

  • i have a hypothesis that in the future we learn how to inflate wormholes back to 13.7 billion years ago and that wormhole starts time and then we create the universe (or it has already happened on another planet). i dont think that thats true but hell it could be. if we were wrong about our understanding in the laws of physics then maybe we could go back in time without creating a paradox by without going back in time it would never have happened so we had to do so.

  • God has no need to have been created, since He exists either outside time (where cause and effect do not operate) or within multiple dimensions of time (such that there is no beginning of God's plane of time). Hence God is eternal, having never been created. Although it is possible that the universe itself is eternal, eliminating the need for its creation, observational evidence contradicts this hypothesis, since the universe began to exist a finite ~13.7 billion years ago.

  • @doomlordist1 The form the universe presently has did begin 13.7 billion years ago. this arbitrary point we the big bang is our frame of reference . Infinite mass and energy existed as a singularity when was the point were this began to exists etc etc.

  • @doomlordist1 The universe never "began to exist" in the sense you are using as far as we know. All of the matter and energy in the universe existed within an infinitely small singularity before the big bang. The big bang is just the point at which the universe expanded.

    Also, the cosmological argument inherently proves that god does not exist. I'll shorten it slightly to show how.

    1. That which exists must a have a cause

    2. God does not have a cause (uncaused)

    Conclusion: God does not exist.

  • @killerkerara Are you stupid?

    The correct 'shortening' would be:

    1. That which exists within the spatio-temporal world must have a cause

    2. God sustains the spatio-temporal world

    3. Therefore, God must exist outside the spatio-temporal world

    Conclusion: The certainty of your conclusion, has no true basis.

  • @killerkerara Or shall i put it differently?

    1. That which exists (within the spatio-temporal world) must have a cause

    2. God does not have a cause (because he is not within the spatio-temporal world)

    Conclusion: You are in no position to draw a conclusion with any certainty that 'God does not exist.

    I am not proving or attempting to prove the existence of God, i am simply pointing out the gaping flaws in your interpretation. I'm done

  • @CVLFMG There is nothing really to determine that a God cannot exist at this point however there is no way to determine that he does exist. Anything that has not been proven to exist, doesn't but it isn't unknowable. It's just not known at this point so neither absolute can be asserted, although God not existing is the more logical and backed up conclusion, because the stance of God existing has not brought forth any evidence.

  • @imshanedulong Cool, let's dance now ^_^

  • Mr. Atheist what do you call a person who belives in God but also belives in evolution and doesn't really belive in the traditional Christian God but a higher force but also belives in science? I'm really curious!

  • @hajlender12 i think that person is just called deist

  • @ulmanis28 A thank you! Than that's what I am a deitist!

  • @hajlender12 Deist, just as our founding fathers were.

  • @hajlender12 That's me as well.

  • @hajlender12 If you believe in heaven or hell then you are a Theist. If you believe in a higher power but believe he is not watching you at all and that he doesn't judge you or create miracles, then you are a Deist.

  • "Since it must exist to bring itself into existence, which is illogical" soo..basically they're calling their god's existence illogical.. thank you christians for proving our point

  • @15Gracieface a divine concious molding and evolving its universal body is more logical then nonexistence bring itself to existence, as for the christian version, whats the difference from there belief and the atheist belief, both creations of existence magically hocus pocused existence

  • @rawextreme101 Atheists never claimed "the universe came from nothing", thats what religious people believe, atheists admit they don't know yet, maybe there's more universes, nobody knows yet, neither do you or anybody else.

  • @VColossalV lol..... its funny how the atheist i debate with on these atheist channels just know with all their mind, body, and soul, that i either got my info from a man or my own assumptions........ im no christian or bible reader, havent been to church since i was 5......... focus on the truth and mentally seek it following instruction when i sign pulls your attention to it to move to the next step.......... and you'll see for yourself

  • @rawextreme101 "im no christian or bible reader, havent been to church since i was 5"

    Then according to the bible, you are going to hell fo all eternity.

  • @VColossalV who do you think sets the path of signs if you chose to walk down it, walk far enough and you'll be directed to only a few and certain passages in the bible, that answer questions thats linked to your natural feelings, walk farther and then you'll start receiving vision, he'll become your concious making your awarness supernatural, i guess you dont realize that im hundreds and thousands of miles down this so call path im tellin you about......

  • @rawextreme101 Yes, i see, you are suffering from delusion. Neurosicence has explained away all the feelings the brain can generate, nothing but a figment of your imagination.

    "Wishful thinking" is a cognition bias – "it's the formation of beliefs and the making of decisions according to what is pleasing to imagine instead of by appeal to evidence or rationality."

  • @VColossalV Ok.......

  • @VColossalV Too bad hell doesn't exist, and was only invented by the early Christian churches to stop people from committing apostasy.

  • @imonmyorange Why are you telling me this? Look at my comments.

  • @TheAmazingAtheist

    If you have a moment, would you explain how an atheist can justify morals. By that I mean do you believe that there are certain behaviors that we "Should" act by? and if so how can you justify that if there was no one except other men equal to yourself to create them?

  • @MrZefia Well, you know that stabbing a bunch of people in the face, is wrong. It's common sense. Look up his video "Atheism is a hoax" it has your question answered in that video.

  • "Let there be matter and energy!"

    Somehow it doesn't have the same ring to it :3

  • The worst thing about these moronic Christians is that they vote and affect the world now, when all they are interested in is the next life. (imaginary gods, a fake mythology and the after-life). They not only don't care about now, but they await the apocalypse with glee. Some extreme god lovers will even bring it (the apocalypse) about to hurry things along a bit.

  • @baalisgod666 without this system of law and order, mankind would of cease to exist many centuries ago, my point his monsters hide under this way of civilization,think they dont? well let me name a few, cannibals, killers, rapist, etc, the source to this horror is satan, a very terrifiying beast that without the presence of god sphering the earth would have been devoured and totured the world, so i respect the anticapation of the apocalypse and the coming of god for the god lovers

  • It would seem as this argument has been thoroughly fucked... in the ass... with a metal dildo.

  • You just gotta love the Matt Slick voice.

  • Continued: So it seems that events do have causes, but those causes must also have causes as well. There is a problem though.. People believe God is uncaused, this makes no sense though, because if an event (The Big Bang) was caused, what caused that must also have a cause meaning the cause can obviously not be uncaused.

    The only logical explanation is the universe is uncaused, this means it does not need need a cause and stops the infinite regress problem.

  • Lets assume every event must have a cause, that cause must also have a cause, and this must go on for an infinite regress. If I punched someone in the face, what caused that? "He pissed me off". What caused that? "He said my mom was fat!" what caused that? "I said his mom was fat" what caused that? "We bumped into each other in the hallway" what caused that? "We both left class" what caused that? "The bell rung" what caused that? .....

  • @justintfs93

    Indeed

  • Comment removed

  • tazactulepuelecta pyonsponticlione

  • "something cannot bring itself into existence"

    what brought god into existence then??

  • science is a human based theory that has many flaws because human beings are imperfect ,yes some science is just common sense but most is wrong unfortunately due to the fact that humans assume,guess,and round off calculations use their beliefs,dislikes,and likes in to these "theorys". i believe god is real because i know hes around and i hate to admit but i assumed that he helped me and my family during hard times .

  • Actually, it was explained to me by someone and in FMA that "matter cannot be created nor destroyed".

    Therefore, the Chomological argument doesn't hold any water. You mad christianfags?

  • You are so boring that I actually fell asleep during this video. And, lets be honest, your really not a very funny guy. When I was actually awake I didn't laugh at any one of your attempts to be funny. You need to stop making pointless videos and get out more.

  • @spoonyboy95 U mad, bro?

  • @deathtris The guys a goon :D

  • @spoonyboy95 Ya, he is, the way he makes an account just so he can comment on a two year old video. Wait, who was I talking about again?

  • Comment removed

  • @spoonyboy95 The point of this video was not to be humorous. It's a refutation of an argument with a little bit of humor injected into it. If you're too retarded to differentiate between something facetious and something serious, then you should seriously consider suicide.

  • @DeepFriedNigger Suicide? Bit extreme mate :D Merry Christmas ;P

  • With or without a God, the idea of an eternal past is freakin nuts!!!!

  • @noofatchiks You misunderstand. I'm NOT an atheist.

  • @CubePlex Nobody made Him, THAT'S WHY HE'S GOD and has always existed. Nobody can possibly fathom it.

  • the world was made from nothing, from nothing came the life. Even scientists say that every single rock on the universe came from a little ping pong ball (size) how? this is why it's unknown, this is why people do believe in god, let me tell you this, Einstein said, he did not believe in the god we learned about, he believed in the ''original'' God, because he said the world is nice, it could be chaotic and ugly, that's why you feel there is a Creator,otherwise what's the purpose of life?

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Super compressed super atomic particles. Not a ping pong ball, it was at an atomic level. Why? It is known. You apparently have never studied the Big Bang. It has been tested and evidence has been collected-background radiation noise and the expansion of the universe. The purpose of life is to live, obviously. To live, to learn, to spread your knowledge and genetics and then to die. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. Neither can matter. Therefore, no Creator.

  • @elnoraemily Apparently you have never seen what they found on the clothing that Jesus died on in, i have no time to talk to a non believer and let me tell you this : i used to not Believe to god for many many years, why i feel there is a god? because many people proved that there is life after death, your Consciousness never die.i am not saying that there is a god like christian saying paradise and hell and bla bla bla, i say there must be a God.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Did God provide you with the educational awareness of structuring sentences?

  • @Leescargill Do you even know that you make no sense?

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz The Shroud of Turin was proved to be a fraud through dating, as well as female blood, not male. Unless Jesus was a woman. Daughter of God? Fascinating. No one has proved there is life after death. Do you know what proof is? If you believe that, you are a sad, delusion person who is merely afraid of dying and tries to comfort yourself with lies. "Consciousness" is your brain. When you no longer have a functioning brain, you no longer have you. A God? Prove it.

  • @elnoraemily I am not afraid of Death buddy, what i am afraid is to cease to exist.that's my fear.Consciousness isn't your brain at all,in fact science proved that when you die you can still see your own body just like when you go to a surgery people said that they saw clearly the doctors operating.Prove that there is no God and there is no Life after Death,you think i wasn't an atheist and i don't know what are you thinking about god? i said there is god, but i am not with anyone's place of 2

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Cease to exist is death, therefore you fear death. No...no they did not prove that you see yourself after death. Not at all. Ever. Not once. You want to know why people can see doctors operating when they are in surgery? Because they are dreaming. What does that have to do with death? And yes, consciousness is your brain. Do you know what the brain does? I do. I know that it controls every single thing about you down to the way you think about God.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz The fact that you think science proved an afterlife is the most ignorant, uneducated thing I have heard anyone say in quite a while. Science has actually maintains that there is probably not an afterlife. When you no longer have a brain, you cease to exist. Take psychology, you obviously do not know that science. Science proved that when you die, your brain floods your system with chemicals that make you hallucinate to make ceasing to exist easier to handle.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Afraid of debating=a weak philosophy.

  • @elnoraemily Time, for us, is a line that goes forward only.Have you ever noticed that you cannot stop or reverse the arrow of time?No matter what you do it just keeps going forward in one direction.Any entity confined to half of the line of time must have a beginning and must be created I can walk home tonight, and that’s it. It’s the simplest, most rigorous proof of the existence of God.and the entire universe is confined to half of the line of time. Therefore if time has a beginning

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Creator as well.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Time is an illusion created by the human mind. Time does not go forward or backward. Time does not actually exist. It's a human construct. Proof? A line in a construct created by the human mind is proof? Proof= factual evidence. You can witness it, gather information on it, touch it, test it. A line in time? It's not even a theory, because you can't test it. It's just a idea based off of illogical thought that stems from a misconception of what time even is. Fail.

  • @elnoraemily As Michio Kaku and many many other famous scientists have made studies, they found that time has a beginning and an end, proof? big bang is the beginning, the expansion of the universe shows clearly that time is moving forward, the end. there is the proof, you atheists have no brains not even clear evidence all you do is talk nonsense that you can't prove it alone.therefore you fail.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Not time, because time is a construct. Those "studies" are completely hypothetical, just a guessing game to try to figure out more about the universe. Did not prove anything. They think our version of reality has a start and an end, but nothing ceases to exist, just changes like the Big Bang changed it's subatomic particle. Clear evidence? Show me evidence for God that doesn't have to do with feelings...or any at all, for that matter.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz Please, read a book/ What is the proof for evolution? Fossils, DNA tests, RNA tests, real-time witnesses adaptation of life forms such as viruses, chromosomes and the fact that we can SEE it happen. Big Bang- background radiation noise, pictures of the "hot" and "cold" zones of leftover radiation, the shifting of the galaxies away from us, the formation of stars out of solar nebula that we can SEE happen. Proof for God? None. Not a single proof for God.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz I can prove all of the evidence that you could possibly present me about evolution and the Big Bang. Yet, you cannot show me one actual proof of God. "Disprove God!" You have to be able to prove something because you can disprove it. And you have none. Here is a logical thought for your scientifically ignorant head- Energy cannot be created or destroyed, neither can matter. A creator cannot create what can't be created.

  • @zZDeMoNiCBoYZz So because you lack sufficient understanding of theoretical physics you label it bullshit? It is nonsense to you perhaps because of YOUR limited grasp on the matter, not because it is illogical. I will give you this much: not everyone can understand such complex subjects, however ignorance is by no means something that disproves a fact simply because the ignorant cannot comprehend that fact.

  • Where can I go to join Atheism, the belief that there is nothing and from nothing comes something because for some miraculous reason particles receive intelligence to act with order. Where can I find a place to join a bunch of people who believes in nothing and yet preach the doctrine of nothing as if it is something?

  • @LaughingAtAtheists Atheism isn't the doctrine, it's a conclusion. If you want to find the doctrine go to a library.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists

    Because the creation of a god isn't something from nothing aswell...

  • @LaughingAtAtheists Atheism isn't a doctrine, and being an atheist doesn't mean you "believe in science," just that you don't believe in a deity.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists well it seems like your just happy being in a cult of ignorant bigoted liars

  • @LaughingAtAtheists Miraculous? Order? Do me a favor, study subatomic particles and their formations into atomic material and then denser matter. And then study the effects of gravity on the growing mass of dense objects and what it does to them. Doctrine? Doctrine, in your ,mind, is a mass quantity of texts full of fallacies and cognitive dissonance. Atheists do not have to believe in anything, the proof is in the laboratory.

  • @laughtingatatheists31 That guy's comment was not offensive in the least. Although you're the hypocrite as your username was created to be insulting. And he's right, you are not doing your religion any favors by parading around as a loathsome troll with no clue about anything. P.S. The bible (buybull) has no such "built-in proof".

  • Matt Slick sounds like the down-syndrome version of the mad hatter.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists Simply saying "I'm not making this up" gives your claims against the fossil record about as much credibility as Pat Robertson's "True Story" involving Haitians dealing with the Devil.

  • @EpicPhalosophy Thou hypocrite,  your comment isn't very appealing or respectful and it's insulting. Oh, I know why, read the next verse.

  • @wetoji I used to think that, but the book DOES actually have built-in proof, but is that really what you wanted to hear?

  • @EpicPhalosophy I like the way I'm doing better than the way you are doing it.

  • lovesXtoXspoog what are you, about 9 yrs old and doing poorly in school?

  • @LaughingAtAtheists31 You're doing an absolutely terrible job representing your religion which is supposed to be about showing god's love to others. You are doing nothing to make your religion sound appealing in any way. You are not defending your faith with gentleness and respect as you're told to do in 1 Peter 3:15. You are spouting rhetoric and insulting others. I don't think that's what christ had in mind when he said to spread the good news to the ends of the earth.

  • The Bible also says that each star is unique.

    1 Corinthians 15:41 There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory.

    All stars look alike to the naked eye.Even when seen through a telescope, they seem to be just points of light. However, analysis of their light spectra reveals that each is unique and different from all others.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists31 your the most retarded ignorant religious nut spammer i have ever seen. congrats on picking verses that mean shit, i could read bad verses all day but i have better things to do than waste time reading the biggest lie of humanity.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists31 You're a fucking troll, I've seen you on his other videos and you always leave a stupid comment before you run away. The sun and the moon aren't different stars, and you just managed to prove the bible gets things wrong -- congrats.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists31 ....That doesn't say that they are unique. It says that their glory is different, as in brightness. Which if you actually read that verse, you would understand. Stars are formed from solar nebulae in space, the gasses from the Big Bang that were compressed by gravity because gravity acts on mass. How do I know this? We can watch it happen through our awesome telescopes because of the speed of light enabling us to literally see the past. Have a nice day

  • The Bible describes the suspension of the Earth in space.

    Job 26:7 He stretches out the north over empty space; He hangs the earth on nothing.

    Statements written hundreds of years before Christ and consistent with meteorology

  • @LaughingAtAtheists31 Just like how they thought the sun revolved around the Earth? Yes, very consistent with astronomy. Not. Uhm, meteorology? What does the study of the atmosphere have to do with Earth's place in space? Nothing...at all. The Earth isn't hanging in space like a painting on a wall. Not hanging. Wrong. Empty space? It's not empty. Wrong. North? There is no North in space. Wrong. Next, please. Relevant this time.

  • What makes the flood important to our topic is all the evidence it left around. For one thing, pretty much everything that did not live in water would have been killed in a yearlong flood. This would have left an enormous layer of dead things that would later become coal and oil . . . and leave fossils. It is evident to everyone, as we view our dwindling energy resources, that a lot of material was left in the ground at one time

  • @LaughingAtAtheists2 The flood did not happen and is Sumerian story called the Epic of Gilgamesh that the Bible stole. The salt water from the flood mixing with the oceans would have destroyed vegetation on Earth and life would have died out from starvation in the time it would have taken from the plants to regrow. You really think the flood caused coal and oil? Read a book, please. That is not factual.

  • The fossil record very consistently shows distinct kinds, NEVER infinite stages for each kind. Each time a theory is refuted by simple facts, evolutionists invent a bigger, more rediculous theory. The evidence shows a worldwide catastraphic flood.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists2 Apparently, you have never studied the fossil records leading up to modern human. Once again, no evidence of a world wide flood. Flooding? Oh yes, lots. World wide? No.

  • WHICH "MISSING LINK" MADE A MONKEY OUT OF YOU? Lucy (a 3' tall chimpanzee), Heidelburg Man (built from a human jawbone), Nebraska Man (built from the tooth of an extinct pig), Piltdown Man (built from the jaw of a modern ape) [I'm not making this up], Neanderthal Man (proven to be a man with arthritis), Cro-Magnon Man (equal in physique and brain capacity as modern man, so what's the difference?).

  • @LaughingAtAtheists You like to stretch the truth into lies to suit your beliefs don't you? Cro-magnon is modern man.

  • Mathematically there would be about 2000+/- people per square foot if man had been around as long as atheists suggests. The sun would have burnt out long time ago (do you imbeciles ever read REAL science).

  • @LaughingAtAtheists Study half life. The sun still has 5 billion more years. Half-life. Chemistry. Fact. You forget things like death rates, diseases, wars, natural disasters, famine, murders and birth rates. These things effect population. As well as the original number of the species. If the Earth was only 6000-10000 years old, Ancient Rome could not have had millions and millions of people.There would not have been enough time. Especially if you believe the flood.

  • Hey, I hate to be the one to break it to y'all; but, you know that cartoon they showed you in school where man is supposedly evolving and your great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great,...grandpa was a monkey? It's not true. It's a disproven myth. They made it up. It's just a cartoon.

  • @AlmoTrademark your stupidity is based on the myth that Christians are anti-science. You've got it backwards. SOP

  • @wetoji  fear of spending eternity in hell causes anyone with half a brain to investigate and receive the free pass out. Only weak moronic embeciles go to hell on purpose. 1Jn 5. vs.13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

  • @HANDLEtheHERETIC You would think an all knowing God would know if someone believes in him just to escape hell. That's pathetic, to believe in something without proof to escape imaginary damnation. Cute.

  • The Flying Spaghetti Monster created everything, he did it in a mysterious way to test our faith. The Flying Spaghetti Monster Is the one true God. He is the reason for gravity, and he modifies all the scientific tests we humans do, so that it seems like there is no God, to test our faith.

    Pasta be upon you.

  • @AlmoTrademark You better had been dressed as a pirate when you wrote that. 

  • @elnoraemily FSM damn it! I keep forgetting that part!

    Oh great Spaghetti Monster! Please forgive me for my sins!

  • @AlmoTrademark Repent before you are doomed to an eternity of stale beer and STDs!

  • @wetoji So, you are smarter than God. You can write, but he can't. You'll get your proof.

  • An evil heart causes atheism. To the twisted minds of atheists, any hint that they might be accountable to God causes many of them to lash out with their hatred. This is an obsession or neurosis bordering on a mild psychosis.

  • @HANDLEtheHERETIC A fear of spending eternity in hell causes weak minded people to become christians. Before you start calling me an evil atheist or whatever you're going to do I am not an atheist, I am an agnostic, I'm smart enough to admit I don't know, I'm not stupid enough to believe in some 2000 year old altered, censored ,mistranslated tome. Those who make outlandish claims are burdened with the burden of proof. A book does not constitute proof

  • @HANDLEtheHERETIC A feeble and weak mind brings Religion. If you cannot see through the lies laid upon lies, then you are a complete fool. An evil heart doesn't bring upon Atheism. An intelligent mind does.

  • @igncom1 except the more logical ones aren't right in the first place. A lot of them left the cult of catholicism for the cult of atheism. Instead of a phony priest telling them what to think, now phony science authors tell them what to think. Their own theories being refuted and replaced as needed.

  • Atheists, in general, put up rediculous straw dummies to prove to themselves that they are being logical. Their faith is an attitude, not logic or science. They gravitate not to investigation of facts, but to disproven theories and rambings of only like minded lost souls and stand up commedians. This is a man-worshipping cult mentality. It is a religion. I'm sure it could be proved in a laboratory that they have a mental handicap and could actually collect social security.

  • @LaughingAtAtheists2 there is a differance between a group of people and a religion. and while i agree that alot of athiests do tend to actually be quite stupid and have no real knolage about one or another ideas that dosent prevent the logical ones from being right in the first place. a religion is based on worship this is more the collection of similar ideas, close indeed but not really the same.

    and lol your user name?

  • @LaughingAtAtheists2 What has been proven in a lab is that atheists have higher IQ's than theists as a whole. Look up that study. Faith is believing in something without proof (Christians). Atheists have no faith. Atheists believe in only fact, things that can be tested and proven. Just because your blind faith to God makes you ignorant to anything not in the Bible, does not make everything else unproven. Theory means it has been repeatedly tested. Not just an idea.

  • @elnoraemily "atheists have higher IQs then theists..."

    This is the core of your statement. I did look up the studies (published as recently as 2008). Interestingly, I took a class where it was taught that "a one score IQ" is a misrepresentation of how our intelligence works. There are actually multiple intelligences (ie. spacial, interpersonal, intrapersonal, linguistic, etc. One form listed is existential intelligence. Atheists could score low on existential IQ.

  • @elnoraemily I forgot to mention that I took the class I mentioned was several years before the published study.

  • @sulkow82 You would be surprised on how well atheists would score on those. A mind not trapped by a certain way of thinking accomplishes quite a lot. However, IQ is measured a certain way and atheists score the highest. That is my point and it is a fact. That actually was not the core of my statement either, it was a quick rebuttal before I got to my point about faith.

  • @elnoraemily "You would be surprised on how well atheists would score on those." I would be interested to see those scores where those scores are separate. What it often seems like atheists do is say that theists score lower in one form of intelligence (ie. debating techniques) and therefore they score lower over-all.

    I would find it strange that atheists would score higher then theists on an axis when atheists argue that only scientifically observable things matter.

  • @elnoraemily I know that the intelligence issue was a side comment for you before moving on to your main point. I am letting the person you were discussing your main point continue that thread. This one is far more interesting for me.

    Are you aware any studies I could look at which isolate and analyze existential intelligence (between atheists and theists)?