insane liberal leftist supporters of ned you guys fucked up bad the voters didn't want a crazy ned lamont alternative to joe liberman go kiss stalins ass you will feel better
LOL...ROFL...Lamont is going to lose! Hey libs...must be nice to sit in school and critize people who defend your liberty every day huh? Oh BTW "Thanks John Carry for halping us gat out of Irak" ROFL!!!
i hope all of u liberals realize that it was not Bush that caused the war in iraq, but saddam because he refused to let most UN inspectors into his country, this made us think that he had something to hide. and the lack of intellegence was caused by Clinton by not funding intellegence organizations, but by funding the "peace dividend".
the UN inspectors were allowed into Iraq, and they completed their job. they told us that there were no weapons, and... guess what? there were no weapons! imagine that.
Other people campaign for Joe Lieberman. Don't you read the papers?
Here's just a few.
Republican Mayor Bloomberg from NYC will be in CT tomorrow campaigning for Joe.
Republican Dick Cheney endorses Joe. Republican Jack Kemp was in CT for Joe on 10/29. Senators Bob Kerry and Mary Landrieu were in CT campaigning for Joe.
There was no Iraq-al Qaeda connection until after we invaded Iraq. No Osama. No WMD. Over 3000 American troops killed and thousands maimed. For lies that Lieberman supported -- and still does.
my point was we have to stay the course in iraq. and about the soldier casualties, over 7000 US troops were killed on Iwo Jima and over 25000 wounded in one day and ur bitching about 3000 killed over the course of 4 years? and plz keep in mind that all the 3000 soldiers were volunteers and not drafties.
How many times have you been to Iraq? How dare you cite 3000 troops and your sorry ass has never picked up a weapon and defended this country. I have family that witnessed the stock piles of enriched urianium and canisters of gas that Saddam had...but CNN (Clinton News Network) wont show it. I cant stand either of your two parties. Until you pick up a gun and defend this country you need to drink a cup of "STFU"
Lieberman hard working? He missed over 300 votes!
You have a problem with Ned using his OWN money? What about Joe getting millions from special interests -- oil companies, drug companies, insurance companies? Think he's going to work for YOU?
Lieberman may be hard working, but he backed the wrong pony. Sucks for him, but Americans missed their opportunity to vote Bush out of office so now Joe's come to symbolize our growing discontent. If the present trend in attitude toward the war in Iraq continue, people won't be asking whether or not we should pull out but how soon. Face it, staying in Iraq now is just wishful thinking. Nothing good has come of it, and nothing will either.
crazydwarf u seem like a reasonable person and liebermans also a decent senator but u really shouldnt stupidly oversimpify things like 'if we leave iraq these guys will make an alliance with bin laden and attack us worse than 9-11' wat r u like 12 years old? face it iraq was a mistake. next time try a country that actualy has wmd like north korea.
nice try with this add. you need to get your values straight. quit trying to help someone who helps bush. november 7th= the day wanna be liebermen is gonna be gone.
if we pull out of iraq the terrorists wont win. and they certaintly wouldnt work with osama. just like joe liebermen, you listen to george w. bush waaaaay to easily. he misled you and your friend joe perfectly. iraq had nothing to do with osama.
why is how much he lost by relevant? the fact is, the majority of CT dems did NOT want him representing them. 4% is a wider margin than a lot of races nowadays.
there is nothing wrong with Edwards, just that he is one of the many democrat figures working for Ned. And joe is clearly hard working if his attendance record is 93 percent.
Hey contard, try telling your bank that you only intend to pay 93% of your mortgage payment! And by the way, contard, I was not aware that Lamont was in the US Senate.
ur definitly right about ur mortgage arguement, and when i was talking about ned's attendance record i was talking about when he was apart of the greenwich legislature
"I will not miss more than 300 votes," Lieberman promised in accusing Weicker of failing to adequately represent the state.
But in comparison, Weicker was the model of modern diligence. Lieberman has missed 418 votes, a new commercial by his challenger Ned Lamont charges.
"I will not have one of the worst attendance records in the United States Senate," Lieberman vowed in charging Weicker had lost interest in being a senator.
Whats wrong with John Edwards?? This is a cheesy video by the way. And you say Joe Lieberman is "hard working"? He is not a hard worker. Hard work is being in the military under the leaderships of Rummy and GW with Leiberman as cheerleader of a failed Iraq policy.
because we took out saddam and left a power vacuum, which allowed al qaeda and plenty of other terrorist groups to move in. there was no such group in iraq before we toppled saddam's regime, and that's a fact you can verify.
Lol this video sucks. A recent Senate report confirmed that Iraq is not connected to the Al-qaeda. What now? You're dumber than a redneck. Don't diss him just because he's rich and you will see why you should vote for him when you go to his website.
my point was can we really vote for a guy who has other democratic figures run for him, while he keeps on going on with his negative ads? Ned has never said why to vote for him, only why to not vote for joe
If anything, this is a video of why TO vote for Ned Lamont, by showing how silly the arguments against him are. John Edwards is campaigning for him, oh no! He wants to pull out of Iraq, and that's somehow wrong for Connecticut? interesting claim.
wow! stupid, racist and uninformed all at the same time! bravo. let's hope that penniless, principled, professional politician beats the pants off lamont!
Given all the hard-right GOPers currently pumping cash into Holy Joe's campaign, I wouldn't use the guilt-by-association with Sharpton and Edwards (Edwards? didn't Joe endorse him for VP a couple years back?) to tar Lamont. Nor, if I were boosting Lieberman, would I mention the Iraq or bin Laden, two matters on which America has failed miserably thanks to President Bush's deficit of leadership and Lieberman's cheerleading of same.
good job RNC, if you are actually a dem, which you are not, you would know that Joe Lieberman might be the most evil man in america.
He is a clear threat the America, Israel, Arab nations, and Persian nations.
Republicans in CT have no honor, Dems in CT has no sense.
Maybe lieberman can be the first CT citizen to show honor and switch parties.
we dont want him
georgep922 5 years ago
NED NED fuckwad liberal didnt win HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
wklp9 5 years ago
insane liberal leftist supporters of ned you guys fucked up bad the voters didn't want a crazy ned lamont alternative to joe liberman go kiss stalins ass you will feel better
homersbrain13 5 years ago
Oh I forgot you people are too gutless and stupid to vote who is best for the people of America.
zrkn1 5 years ago
This video pwns Lamont. Lamont/Doherty observatory
on the NY/NJ border. We can see
Connecticut from here and Lamont is a lamer.
He is no Corzine - a rich dude with integrity
and a plan. Lamont is a hater and a destroyer of
progress.
speedcrayzy 5 years ago
Looks like we have 2 rotten apples falling from the tree. Will the real American please stand up.
zrkn1 5 years ago
Hello everyone, just a reminder to get out and VOTE on Election Day tuesday
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
Lieberman is bent. He's a Zionist lobbyist that needs to look at every photo of Iraqi kids with their heads and limbs blown off by "shock & awe" ...
We have enough senseless Repugs -- no thanks Joe!
HyperVista 5 years ago
LOL...ROFL...Lamont is going to lose! Hey libs...must be nice to sit in school and critize people who defend your liberty every day huh? Oh BTW "Thanks John Carry for halping us gat out of Irak" ROFL!!!
SoupPotato 5 years ago
i think i'll vote for ned lamont just because that video was so bad.
snapsnap99 5 years ago
i love the Atari video-game music
marimadness9 5 years ago
i hope all of u liberals realize that it was not Bush that caused the war in iraq, but saddam because he refused to let most UN inspectors into his country, this made us think that he had something to hide. and the lack of intellegence was caused by Clinton by not funding intellegence organizations, but by funding the "peace dividend".
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
the UN inspectors were allowed into Iraq, and they completed their job. they told us that there were no weapons, and... guess what? there were no weapons! imagine that.
nightdriver 5 years ago
Other people campaign for Joe Lieberman. Don't you read the papers?
Here's just a few.
Republican Mayor Bloomberg from NYC will be in CT tomorrow campaigning for Joe.
Republican Dick Cheney endorses Joe. Republican Jack Kemp was in CT for Joe on 10/29. Senators Bob Kerry and Mary Landrieu were in CT campaigning for Joe.
vchele 5 years ago
There was no Iraq-al Qaeda connection until after we invaded Iraq. No Osama. No WMD. Over 3000 American troops killed and thousands maimed. For lies that Lieberman supported -- and still does.
vchele 5 years ago
my point was we have to stay the course in iraq. and about the soldier casualties, over 7000 US troops were killed on Iwo Jima and over 25000 wounded in one day and ur bitching about 3000 killed over the course of 4 years? and plz keep in mind that all the 3000 soldiers were volunteers and not drafties.
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
How many times have you been to Iraq? How dare you cite 3000 troops and your sorry ass has never picked up a weapon and defended this country. I have family that witnessed the stock piles of enriched urianium and canisters of gas that Saddam had...but CNN (Clinton News Network) wont show it. I cant stand either of your two parties. Until you pick up a gun and defend this country you need to drink a cup of "STFU"
SoupPotato 5 years ago
Lieberman hard working? He missed over 300 votes!
You have a problem with Ned using his OWN money? What about Joe getting millions from special interests -- oil companies, drug companies, insurance companies? Think he's going to work for YOU?
vchele 5 years ago
plz see my movie entitled "Ned Lies again! Joe DOES Deliver!"
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
that's why we're 49th out of 50 for return on our tax dollars, eh?
nightdriver 5 years ago
Lieberman may be hard working, but he backed the wrong pony. Sucks for him, but Americans missed their opportunity to vote Bush out of office so now Joe's come to symbolize our growing discontent. If the present trend in attitude toward the war in Iraq continue, people won't be asking whether or not we should pull out but how soon. Face it, staying in Iraq now is just wishful thinking. Nothing good has come of it, and nothing will either.
SluttySanta 5 years ago
crazydwarf u seem like a reasonable person and liebermans also a decent senator but u really shouldnt stupidly oversimpify things like 'if we leave iraq these guys will make an alliance with bin laden and attack us worse than 9-11' wat r u like 12 years old? face it iraq was a mistake. next time try a country that actualy has wmd like north korea.
tiki252 5 years ago
nice try with this add. you need to get your values straight. quit trying to help someone who helps bush. november 7th= the day wanna be liebermen is gonna be gone.
if we pull out of iraq the terrorists wont win. and they certaintly wouldnt work with osama. just like joe liebermen, you listen to george w. bush waaaaay to easily. he misled you and your friend joe perfectly. iraq had nothing to do with osama.
sebkhan 5 years ago
i know iraq has nothing to do with osama. however there is an iraqi al quaeda branch, which might side with the insurgents
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
sucked pipe? u can just say dick cuz i dont give a rats ass, and joe only lost by 4%.
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
Tell it to Al Gore, contard.
FGFM 5 years ago
why is how much he lost by relevant? the fact is, the majority of CT dems did NOT want him representing them. 4% is a wider margin than a lot of races nowadays.
nightdriver 5 years ago
that video was pretty bad no offense
tiki252 5 years ago
none taken, i just do these movies in my spare time, i really dont have time to follow the candidates around.
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
Wow, that's most Republican Democratic campaign ad I've ever seen! No wonder Lieberman sucked the pipe in that primary.
spiderbaby1958 5 years ago
there is nothing wrong with Edwards, just that he is one of the many democrat figures working for Ned. And joe is clearly hard working if his attendance record is 93 percent.
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
93% would get you fired from most jobs, contard!
FGFM 5 years ago
93% is an "A" and why do u care about CT elections if u live in chicago? and Ned has the same attendance record as joe.
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
Hey contard, try telling your bank that you only intend to pay 93% of your mortgage payment! And by the way, contard, I was not aware that Lamont was in the US Senate.
FGFM 5 years ago
ur definitly right about ur mortgage arguement, and when i was talking about ned's attendance record i was talking about when he was apart of the greenwich legislature
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
"I will not miss more than 300 votes," Lieberman promised in accusing Weicker of failing to adequately represent the state.
But in comparison, Weicker was the model of modern diligence. Lieberman has missed 418 votes, a new commercial by his challenger Ned Lamont charges.
"I will not have one of the worst attendance records in the United States Senate," Lieberman vowed in charging Weicker had lost interest in being a senator.
FGFM 5 years ago
Whats wrong with John Edwards?? This is a cheesy video by the way. And you say Joe Lieberman is "hard working"? He is not a hard worker. Hard work is being in the military under the leaderships of Rummy and GW with Leiberman as cheerleader of a failed Iraq policy.
modesteinissey 5 years ago
how recent was the report? plz keep in mind i made this video a week ago
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
months, man. saddam and osama have always been enemies.
nightdriver 5 years ago
then why does al quadea have an iraqi wing?
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
because we took out saddam and left a power vacuum, which allowed al qaeda and plenty of other terrorist groups to move in. there was no such group in iraq before we toppled saddam's regime, and that's a fact you can verify.
nightdriver 5 years ago
Lol this video sucks. A recent Senate report confirmed that Iraq is not connected to the Al-qaeda. What now? You're dumber than a redneck. Don't diss him just because he's rich and you will see why you should vote for him when you go to his website.
iammonicalewinsky 5 years ago
and u guys say my videos suck? there a helluva lot better than ned's will ever be!
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
Nice race-baiting, contard.
FGFM 5 years ago
its not just your videos, your grammar and spelling is bad too...
conradob 5 years ago
my point was can we really vote for a guy who has other democratic figures run for him, while he keeps on going on with his negative ads? Ned has never said why to vote for him, only why to not vote for joe
crazydwarf34 5 years ago
have you ever looked at his website? have you ever seen his speeches? have you watched either of his debates?
nightdriver 5 years ago
If anything, this is a video of why TO vote for Ned Lamont, by showing how silly the arguments against him are. John Edwards is campaigning for him, oh no! He wants to pull out of Iraq, and that's somehow wrong for Connecticut? interesting claim.
youcos 5 years ago
wow! stupid, racist and uninformed all at the same time! bravo. let's hope that penniless, principled, professional politician beats the pants off lamont!
SiddneyFinch 5 years ago
Also the production values here totally suck! If I felt passionately about a candidate I'd put a little more effort into my ridiculous youtube clip.
mcearlgrey 5 years ago
Given all the hard-right GOPers currently pumping cash into Holy Joe's campaign, I wouldn't use the guilt-by-association with Sharpton and Edwards (Edwards? didn't Joe endorse him for VP a couple years back?) to tar Lamont. Nor, if I were boosting Lieberman, would I mention the Iraq or bin Laden, two matters on which America has failed miserably thanks to President Bush's deficit of leadership and Lieberman's cheerleading of same.
mcearlgrey 5 years ago
Q: Hey Ned,What's a zombie?
A: A zombie? Oh, thats a terrible thing. It's a dead person brought back to life with a completely blank mind doing the bidding of a voodoo priest.
You mean, just like a Democrat?
warptek 5 years ago