the offside goal at 4:18 should have been counted. the defender and the attacker were on the same line. I think it was called offside because the attacker was wearing white, so he was seen more easily than the defender, who was behind him. any opinions?
the offside goal at 4:18 should have been counted. the defender and the attacker were on the same line. I think it was called offside because the attacker was wearing white, so he was seen more easily than the defender, who was behind him. any opinions?
kamoliko 10 months ago
hich kudum az mogheiyat ha khatarnak nabud!
hatsoroush23 10 months ago
@hatsoroush23 I agree
Atet8oo7 10 months ago