it dosen't matter what the anti gunners think or say , bottem line is this govenment said they would scrap (LGR) they ran on it and won , thanks canadianreich again for posting this ,i love reading this stuff , antigunners are ducked up, sorry type error, keep fighting the good fight ,and at least you can comment on his vids , there are anti gun vids which you cannot comment on , don't they believe in freedom of speech , those vids i would call self serving , we win they lose
anti gun people are a stain on the under wear of life, they should watch the vid called( rights and freedom violations).and see if they still argee, bill c-68 violates 11 freedoms and rights , thus it should be illegal, canadians deserve better, thanks candice, your hotter than a smokin gunn
@nbelhannache One problem with that.... Getting rid of the LGR is not the majority of citizens opinion. Mopst polls shows only one province faithfully has a majority of people wishing to get rid of the LGR and bet you can't guess which one that is.
Visit the poster who uploaded this - "CanadianReich" - and ask yourself if they are sending an information piece here or something to serve their self interests. And this is where the support comes for Ms Hoeppner? C'mon.
@twinlakes22 I did not send any information piece. I youtube stuff for fun and on things that interest me. I don't see you questioning my motives for uploading videos on birds, insects, waterfalls, or even my shooting at the rifle range, yet I post some MPs debating and you have a problem with that..... Regarding your last sentence you seem to be attempting an insult but I can't quite figure out what it is meant to infer.
@twinlakes22 I will simplify this for you as you are mixing up politics with my structure of the video, which is I think where your question lie. If person #1 says A, B, C, D, E, F, and G and then person#2 rebuts to points A, C, and G, the "back and forth" between said parties would only include points A, C, and G from persons #1 and persons #2. Points B, D, E, and F would be extraneous and not relevant. (more)
@CanadianReich That being said there were 3 main points Candice made 1) auto queries (not debated as both sides agreed) 2) the unanimity of ALL the chiefs in support of the LGR 3) the logic fallacy "appeal to authority"- people are predisposed to follow authority figures and believe what they say (I have psychology references if needed). The Chiefs wearing their uniforms and demanding that people respect their opinions, do as they suggest, due to their title and clothing is quite relevant
Terrible editing job done by poster of this to ensure that the full message of Chiefs of Police is not heard. Truly disgusting and pathetic that you would cut off statements in mid sentences or not show the overall message just to serve your own interests. Sad as were the allegations of Hoeppner.
I looked at what the Chiefs said and what Candice said. Of what the Chiefs said I only included what was relevant to Candice's reply. Candice mentioned auto hits and the Chief's noting their unanimity for keeping the LGR so I only included the parts where the Chiefs mentioned the auto-hits and where they "all" support keeping the LGR. The video was about the back-and-forth between the two parties so I only included the relevant parts. If I missed any let me know.
@CanadianReich So following your line of thought, this is a political message then. You edited it, or in your words "only included the parts" in order to corroborate Candices view. Most would call that propaganda. Judging from the 'raw, raw' excitement from a few other commenters, you achieved your goal. Are you actually trying to deny it? Yours (and Candices) attempt to put words into the mouths of the Chiefs is pretty sad. It completely ignores the very legitimate concerns of law enforcement.
@twinlakes22 Nope. If Candice had gone 1st,spoken many things, and then the chiefs had rebutted her it would have been her that was cut down to the skinny and put up next to the Chief's full rebuttal. As it was the Chiefs went up first and said their bit, then Candice replied to them. Her reply was selective and specific, THUS my cuts had to be the same. Again, if Candice went up 1st and the Chiefs rebutted it would have been reversed in order to keep it point VS point exactly.
@CanadianReich You do a great job uploading videos on birds, insects, waterfalls, or even your shooting at the rifle range. I would stick to that. Your editing to suit a political purpose fails miserably as you are solely focussed on contributing to a highly distorted message by Ms. Hoepner. How come you didnt include the statement that "there has been a disturbing attempt to discredit the view of law enforcement" (lead by Ms Hoepner).....sorry, that would not support your message, would it?
Candice Hoeppner for the next Prime Minister of Canada! I'm serious. She has brains and knows how to use them.
My understanding is that the officers on the street have no faith in the long gun registry, nor in the hand gun registry for that matter. How many more police constables could we hire with the money that useless registry wastes?
I think we should keep this momentum going on and scrap the handgun registry as well which has been up since 1934 and is a failure in crime prevention
it dosen't matter what the anti gunners think or say , bottem line is this govenment said they would scrap (LGR) they ran on it and won , thanks canadianreich again for posting this ,i love reading this stuff , antigunners are ducked up, sorry type error, keep fighting the good fight ,and at least you can comment on his vids , there are anti gun vids which you cannot comment on , don't they believe in freedom of speech , those vids i would call self serving , we win they lose
590spx 2 weeks ago
anti gun people are a stain on the under wear of life, they should watch the vid called( rights and freedom violations).and see if they still argee, bill c-68 violates 11 freedoms and rights , thus it should be illegal, canadians deserve better, thanks candice, your hotter than a smokin gunn
590spx 3 weeks ago
The CACP do NOT speak for all law enforcement. Candice owned these schmucks! Good job Candice!
KroolMachine 1 month ago
this gives me hope for the future.
Firearms4Canada 2 months ago
once again Candice chews em up and spits em out!! good job Candice
outdoorguy750 2 months ago 3
Candice Hoeppner is kinda cute.
smartbomb33 3 months ago
@nbelhannache One problem with that.... Getting rid of the LGR is not the majority of citizens opinion. Mopst polls shows only one province faithfully has a majority of people wishing to get rid of the LGR and bet you can't guess which one that is.
quedorf 3 months ago
@quedorf Quebec! Am I right? :b
CanadianReich 3 months ago
@CanadianReich Nope... Alberta. But good guess.
quedorf 3 months ago
Visit the poster who uploaded this - "CanadianReich" - and ask yourself if they are sending an information piece here or something to serve their self interests. And this is where the support comes for Ms Hoeppner? C'mon.
twinlakes22 3 months ago
@twinlakes22 I did not send any information piece. I youtube stuff for fun and on things that interest me. I don't see you questioning my motives for uploading videos on birds, insects, waterfalls, or even my shooting at the rifle range, yet I post some MPs debating and you have a problem with that..... Regarding your last sentence you seem to be attempting an insult but I can't quite figure out what it is meant to infer.
CanadianReich 3 months ago
@twinlakes22 I will simplify this for you as you are mixing up politics with my structure of the video, which is I think where your question lie. If person #1 says A, B, C, D, E, F, and G and then person#2 rebuts to points A, C, and G, the "back and forth" between said parties would only include points A, C, and G from persons #1 and persons #2. Points B, D, E, and F would be extraneous and not relevant. (more)
CanadianReich 3 months ago
@CanadianReich That being said there were 3 main points Candice made 1) auto queries (not debated as both sides agreed) 2) the unanimity of ALL the chiefs in support of the LGR 3) the logic fallacy "appeal to authority"- people are predisposed to follow authority figures and believe what they say (I have psychology references if needed). The Chiefs wearing their uniforms and demanding that people respect their opinions, do as they suggest, due to their title and clothing is quite relevant
CanadianReich 3 months ago
Terrible editing job done by poster of this to ensure that the full message of Chiefs of Police is not heard. Truly disgusting and pathetic that you would cut off statements in mid sentences or not show the overall message just to serve your own interests. Sad as were the allegations of Hoeppner.
twinlakes22 3 months ago
@twinlakes22
I looked at what the Chiefs said and what Candice said. Of what the Chiefs said I only included what was relevant to Candice's reply. Candice mentioned auto hits and the Chief's noting their unanimity for keeping the LGR so I only included the parts where the Chiefs mentioned the auto-hits and where they "all" support keeping the LGR. The video was about the back-and-forth between the two parties so I only included the relevant parts. If I missed any let me know.
CanadianReich 3 months ago
@CanadianReich So following your line of thought, this is a political message then. You edited it, or in your words "only included the parts" in order to corroborate Candices view. Most would call that propaganda. Judging from the 'raw, raw' excitement from a few other commenters, you achieved your goal. Are you actually trying to deny it? Yours (and Candices) attempt to put words into the mouths of the Chiefs is pretty sad. It completely ignores the very legitimate concerns of law enforcement.
twinlakes22 3 months ago
@twinlakes22 Nope. If Candice had gone 1st,spoken many things, and then the chiefs had rebutted her it would have been her that was cut down to the skinny and put up next to the Chief's full rebuttal. As it was the Chiefs went up first and said their bit, then Candice replied to them. Her reply was selective and specific, THUS my cuts had to be the same. Again, if Candice went up 1st and the Chiefs rebutted it would have been reversed in order to keep it point VS point exactly.
CanadianReich 3 months ago
@CanadianReich You do a great job uploading videos on birds, insects, waterfalls, or even your shooting at the rifle range. I would stick to that. Your editing to suit a political purpose fails miserably as you are solely focussed on contributing to a highly distorted message by Ms. Hoepner. How come you didnt include the statement that "there has been a disturbing attempt to discredit the view of law enforcement" (lead by Ms Hoepner).....sorry, that would not support your message, would it?
twinlakes22 3 months ago
The CACP horse shit is finally being exposed for what it is. Lies. Candice gutted those two.
pittsky 3 months ago 7
Candice Hoeppner is fantastic, she is doing an awesome job.
MrFoxer35 3 months ago
Thank you Ms. Candice Hoeppner for supporting law abiding firearm Hunters, Farmer, Sportshooter, Collectors. Thank you, xxxxx
bushy240 3 months ago
The Order of Canada for Candice at the least.
conifergreen2 3 months ago
Candice Hoeppner for the next Prime Minister of Canada! I'm serious. She has brains and knows how to use them.
My understanding is that the officers on the street have no faith in the long gun registry, nor in the hand gun registry for that matter. How many more police constables could we hire with the money that useless registry wastes?
doralh 3 months ago
I think we should keep this momentum going on and scrap the handgun registry as well which has been up since 1934 and is a failure in crime prevention
damagkhrab 3 months ago
CACP are masters of deception but we can see through their bullshit as easily as looking through air.
smokechecker300 3 months ago 2
Yup. More lies from the boys in blue. Control, control, control, that's all they really want.
Glockster42 3 months ago 9
Comment removed
carver6591 1 month ago
Damn I think I just fell in love with that woman, anyways those cops probably haven't even held a gun in 10 years.
BALJIT147 3 months ago 2
I wonder when I'm gonna need a licence for my kithen knives
Wildmanhunter1 3 months ago 2
@Wildmanhunter1 Probably when they run out of restrictions on firearms
BALJIT147 3 months ago