Excerpt from the Interview with Henry Stapp, Science and Nonduality Anthology DVD

[alwinder60]

" If it were a class I would have dropped it"

It seems to me that you have good company.I hear that most physicists acknowledge Entanglement,and even though they are eager to use it in applications (electronics for example),they actually do not care about why Nature seems to be non local,so,as you said,nobody knows exactly why Entanglement works,only how Entanglement works.

[circusOFprecision]

@alwinder60

check out the higher dimensional interpretation of quantum entanglement

[eclecticwhyzas]

I don't consider myself stupid, but I fail to see what is said in this video of any substance other than a conceptual agreement with the quantum status quo. Someone (John) wanted to disprove the quantum theory of Bell's, but didn't , and although we "know" the previous theories of how this universe is run are incorrect, we still have no idea how it is. If it were a class I would have dropped it. But that's me.

[Farscape1Contact]

@eclecticwhyzas If you fail to see any substance it must not have any... for you ! The universe doesn't have any substance it does have focused energy fields of awareness or lack of awareness like the human ego lol !

[eclecticwhyzas]

@Farscape1Contact Thanks for your reply. I wonder--as a spokesperson for this universe thing,how do you know what the universe (whatever that denotes) is, or has, or does? This is not unlike the folks that tell us what god (another concept) wants, thinks, is. As one that seems to be a part of this entity-how can you speak so confidently about the whole? Just because it is said a lot does not give it truth. I don't doubt your brilliance-just your presumptions as facts. Peace Brother, GLS

[MartinMouseBrave]

@eclecticwhyzas - Indeed, it is just you. The rest of us are interested in these topics.