Added: 1 year ago
From: thedewline
Views: 26,284
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (68)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • cuanta falta hace a la fuerza aerea de chile 24 de estos, very nice.

  • @kempmt1 Well considering its going to play the ground attack role. -_-

  • people who no nothing tend to say jet. The lady needs to shut up with that bs. Nice clean shot. Well no shit. wtf do she think its gunna go backwards

  • Fox 3! Nice! Clean Shot!

  • are they going to make a single seat version of the f-15 silent eagle

  • Will this be a single seat or two-seater like the F-15E?

  • The Silent Eagle has twin vertical tails canted outward 15 degrees. This one in the video is just a Strike Eagle. 

  • @RichKilla86ers Really? How come theyre talking about internal wepaons bays then?

  • @Antifaith29 Im pretty sure they had shitty video editor who got both planes mix in one. The first part when the F-15 took off was a Strike Eagle, and the last part was the Silent Eagle.

  • The F-15 is a very cute jet.

  • ill take 2

  • the lovely vertical stabilizers

    In short, this is not a stealth fighter.

  • @Ultrasonicmolester It's an F-15E modified to test the new conformal weapons bays. The final product will have a 15 degree tilt on its vertical stabilizers, but will not have all aspect stealth, which is prohibitively expensive. Instead, the modifications will be aimed at greatly reducing the frontal RCS, which will be very useful in air to air engagements. It won't fool air defenses, but the surfaces on fighters aren't large enough to work against the new VHF radar systems anyways.

  • Thats a F-15 E..

  • Soon there will be silent flankers....

  • Beautiful.

  • More Info...

    There in no Silent Eagles builded... This is a Strike Eagle modifed to test and demostrate some of the Silent Eagle tecnologies.

    Silent Eagles will have 15° inclined vertical stabilzers to reduce RCS.

    In this Eagle, CFT was modified to locate the future weapons bay in order to reduce CFT too..

  • This is not an Silent Eagle (SE)... Its a Strike Eagle (SE)

  • to bad israel is only getting these jets the u.s would of probably used this jet but we spent billions and billions on the f-35 and then obama the fag had to cancel that project so the u.s is no longer the leader in jet fighters china is starting to make better jets than us and russia

  • @goarmy979 the F-35 isnt cancalled

  • I thought the the twin vertical stabilizers were supposed to be diagonal on the SE? It said and showed diagonal stabilizers on the digital marketing video for this plane.

  • Comment removed

  • WOW Russians get this and go home with the news!

  • @helmetless sure, we'll rape you with our AA rockets, ok? Your welcome.

  • Always was a very sexy Jet, glad its not getting scrapped.

  • @123backinyerface like F22....

  • @123backinyerface Not downing you but they wouldn't scrap that jet for a long time. 1 on 1 the F-15 bested the Su-30 during cope India exercises. Now that it's stealth and probably only a matter of time before they look to take tech from the F-15 Active to make it 10x more kickass.

  • @123backinyerface If they modified the stealth eagle to the Active the F-15 would stay in service for a looooong time. Other than an A-10 I don't know of too many aircraft that flew home with one wing.

  • The last picture is F-18 XD

  • Su-27 pilots are more fucked than ever before.

  • @vfIskullangel Why do you say that?

  • @StiviGun1 This has F-22 like capablitiles.

  • @vfIskullangel The F-15 has a much bigger range than the F-22. The F-22 has a very short range. But in regards to stealth and avionics, the F-22 is superior. Anyway, my opinion is that the Yf-23 shoul've been selected, not the F-22. The YF-23 was superior to the F-22 in every area, except low speed maneuverability, but only when the F-22 is using its TVC. Without TVC, the YF-23 has better low speed performances than the F-22.

  • @StiviGun1 I agree with you on the YF-23 should have been selected.

  • @vfIskullangel Well, since it's your money they make these acquisitions on, I think the American people should have the right to express its opinion on the way Congress accepts or rejects a certain system. This is how it would be fair. After all, it's the American people money that makes those involved in the weapons business rich.

  • @StiviGun1 locked martin also said the F-22 would be cheaper to build, completely BS, for all we know the YF-23 would have been cheaper, same with f-35's their should be repercussions for BS'ing cost estimates/

  • @Baseshocks Yes, there should be some repercussions for lying on a certain weapons system costs. Like paying back the money.

    As for YF-23, besides the fact that it was a superior design to the F-22, i honestly believe it would've also been cheaper. Just like the Northrop's proposal for their own JSF program. Lockheed Martin is the biggest con in the US' weapons industry.

  • @StiviGun1 Fuck off idiot, you have no idea how much the YF-23 would have cost to build. Its capabilities were not superior in every area, more unsubstantiated bullshit from you. Copy and pasting from forums does not make it true moron.

  • @Jospehporta You stupid, the YF-23 was superior from every point of view, except low speed maneuverability where the F-22 is superior only due to its TVC. Other than that, the YF-23 was superior: faster, more stealthy, much better basic maneuverability. In fact, one of its features, the canted rudders, is not being copied by Lockheed Martin in their Saber Warrior concept. So fuck off, you stupid piece of shit harasser. Damn, you wre quick to follow me. U stupid lifeless loser.

  • @StiviGun1 As usual you have nothing to back you up, just the usual BS you repeat over and over again. Funny thing is you're copying opinions from other people, just like you did to me.

    You have absolutely no idea about what you;re talking about. Same as your stupid comments on shaped charges and your complete lack of knowledge of hydrodynamic penetration. When you fucked off from that video pretty quickly :)

  • @Jospehporta "You have absolutely no idea about what you;re talking about" U still don't know how 2 write in English, do u...?

    Listen, why is it so hard 4 u 2 get a life? I mean, how did a 30 years old moron get so pathetic that his entire life is YT, ha? Harassing people on YT, that is. Why is it so hard 4 u 2 actually get a real life, ha? U really r pathetic, u know that? Why don't u just kill yourself, u really r USELESS. Stop being a burden 4 ur parents & kill yourself, really.

  • @StiviGun1 Ahh the gypsy troll shows his true colours. TROLL.

    You really are sad, telling people to kill themselves, its a sure sign that you have a very low self esteem. Hell you;re only friends are on YT and even they think you're a moron. It's hilarious.

  • @Jospehporta I'm not telling people to go kill themselves, I'm telling you to go kill yourself because you're too pathetic and too stupid to live.

  • @StiviGun1 Dude, if you're going to write something at least use a spell check, your atrocious grammar is bad enough without any spelling mistakes.

    LOL you really need to get a life and stop accusing other people of not having when when it is obvious you are talking about yourself :)

  • @Jospehporta Where are my grammar mistakes, stupid? Like I said, u would come up with any answer just to have something to reply with in order to have the last word. Everybody can see that you're nothing but a pathetic loser who, in real life gets spit on by everybody. That's why you;re so mad and feel so good when you have the last word on YT. Because you just can't have it in real life. God you're pathetic and stupid. What the fuck stops you from killing yourself anyway?

  • @StiviGun1 LOL your last rant is full of grammar mistakes, you're too stupid to see them. No surprise there. You mad bro? HAHA, of course you are, it's hilarious.

  • @Jospehporta No, stupid, u're mad 'cause u have no value in life & in ur real shitty life everybody spits and walks all over you... That's why u harass people on YT. You're the most pathetic and stupid person I'e ever seen. Now go kill yourself.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL I'm mad? LMAO, I not the one sitting at a computer in an internet cafe red faced, trying desperately to find a comeback.......that would be YOU :)

    You are a very angry person but very funny as well.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL it's obvious that every time you try and insult someones life, you're really talking about yours. No wonder you;re so mad, your life must be terrible and on top of that you're a gypsy as well. Sucks to be you.

  • CHILE has f-16B50/52 and i think that we need too the f-15silent eagle

    maybe!! xD... greetens the f-15has 5generation tecnology :-) ¿¿or not?? :-S

  • @taekarkung , actually back in 08 the f-22 was cancelled. It's just too expensive and it's considered " cold war technology" according to Robert Gates. The f15SE is goin to be our new craft. We already have around 180 f22s in our inventory . That's more than enough of that "futuristic" aircraft .

  • i think that very nice

  • The F-15's only real problem is age. You might have heard about the recent grounding of all C models because of some mid-air breakups caused by years of g-stress on the airframes. We actually had to get help on air defense from the Canadians because there weren't enough F-22s to pick up the slack.

  • @1st503rdSGT I think it is time to send all existing F-15s to overhaul. Better give them all total makeover, upgrading the F-15C to F-15F that was supposed to enter service back in 1997 as rival to EF-2000. I remember well that time Eurofighter group gave away free catalogues of EF2000 at their marketing & sales booth pitting EF2000 against Rafale and F-15F (single seater variant of F-15E). Perhaps they could make F-15SF

  • @taekarkung

    I think they canceled the old version already didn't they? I love this new stealth F-15, the only unfortunte thing is that we included it in our "record arms sale" to Saudi Arabia.

  • @JohnQRandom F-15SE should sell well compared to PAK-FA. One thing that PAK-FA don't have are proven avionics, weapons effectiveness, reliability, durability and practicality. I'll buy F-15SE. When comes to war, fighters that could fly proper air to ground mission with air to air capability considered main priority.

  • @JohnQRandom F-15F was cancelled due to higher demand for heavy duty twin-seat fighter bomber. It was introduced in mid-90's to counter EF2000 & Rafale sales debut. It was listed in EF2000 catalog as main rival in comparison table. America is looking forward to phase out the F-15/16/18 slowly. More likely to go for F-22, F-35 and UCAV in future. Maybe remotely piloted or self automated UCAV will become primary fighters. The remake F-15/16/18 are to be sold for export market rival Su-35 & EF2000

  • @taekarkung

    That SU-35 is remarkable, not to mention inexpensive. I thought the Raptor was canceled due high costs, but they could always pick up where they left off.

  • @JohnQRandom Yes, Su-35 is remarkable but its weapons, avionics, RWR, radar, ECM, ECCM capabilities are not proven. The F-15SE is using weapons, avionics, radar incorporated RWR, ECM, ECCM, etc that are further development of proven previous generation. If my country engaged Singapore Air Force, flying the RMAF F/A-18D against RSAF F-16C/D Block 50/52 still stand 50/50 chance. The Su-30MKM is leaving a question mark whether it might be comparable to F-16C/D, better or worse.

  • Comment removed

  • Can existing F-15s be upgraded with those fastpacks and the better avionics package? That would greatly increase the service viability of the plane.

  • @1st503rdSGT Just the CFT style internal bay and avionics. Not the stealth panel layers, new wings and the new sloped tail fins without total makeover. Looks like there aren't many F-15 fans out there. Else this vid would have been filled with comments. F-15s achieved more scores, goals and records than most fighters and yet people still think Su-30MK/35BM, Mig-35 and PAK-FA are better. I'll buy F-15SE

  • @taekarkung Right on. No one wants to look at actual kill ratios.

  • @1st503rdSGT Just sad, there are so many military fans like us out there but not many really look into practicality, reality and achievement records. Top scorer being branded as inferior to untested & unproven fighters that could prove agility and aerial stunts. Not ability to search and track targets and effectively shoot them down. In reality, fighters are more likely to perform close air support and ground attack role with some air to air combat. F-15 did well in air to air and air to ground

  • @taekarkung Im an F-15 fan but i'll be the first to admit that the PAK-FA is a superior fighter in every way possible! It's like comparing the mighty F-15 to an F-4! But since the F-22 wont be sold to foriegn nations, the Silent Eagle will have to fill the gap.

  • @bujoun76 PAK-FA is superior in maneuverability and lower RCS if they made the stealth panels right. Avionics, weapons effectiveness and defense against ECM attack remain question mark. Silent Eagle receives total makeover and yet to reveal its new capability. Heard they redesign the wings and fins to give it tighter turn rate. Give it time to prove itself before jumping to final conclusion

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more