Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Agreed, a functional missile shield would render enemy nations' nuclear threat impotent.

    However, the question is whether or not U.S. will give the defensive technology out into the public domain so EVERY nuclear missile will be rendered useless?

    No, they will not. As it is, a functional missile shield would give U.S. the possibility to use nuclear threat without fear of retaliation, and as such will with every reason be seen as a greatest threat of the age by others nations.

  • The missile threat faced by the U.S. actually has declined in recent decades. Two-thirds of the nations cited by Cheney have only short-range ballistic missiles with ranges under 1,000 kilometers. This is always ignored when he cites the 30 countries with ballistic missile capability. The long-range missiles threatening the U.S. have shrunk by 71% over the past 20 years. Five nations have developed medium-range missiles over this period — China, India, Iran, North Korea and Pakistan.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more