Added: 2 years ago
From: RAMDACs
Views: 226,676
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (344)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He could have just turned on no GUI boot. 

  • your xp is not legit. 

  • How did you do that?

  • @austinklucas RAID0 SSD. It says it in the title

  • Waoooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww

  • Comment removed

  • you cut the video off early, task bar apps and icons didn't show yet, it was not fully booted, (bios took forever, my gigabyte mb bios is much faster then that)

  • Like a boss.

  • jaki jest cel walczyć o sekundę przy uruchamianiu, skoro i tak wszystko niweczy długie uruchamianie się biosu, oraz fakt, że komputer uruchamiamy góra 2 - 3 razy dziennie, a niektórzy to może raz na dwa dni.

  • >4 SSDs in RAID 0.

    Oh boy!

  • Comment removed

  • my pc can do no boot screen with HDD. no /NOGUIBOOT

  • @ItsReal2000 lol

  • Don't SSD's Performances decrease a lot with winXP due to missing the TRIM command?

  • @jojotjuh most of the ssd have garbage collection wich works for xp

  • @jojotjuh Those are old SSD's. My SSD (Kingston SSDNow V+ 100 series) has built in garbage collection which is basicly TRIM. I can install any OS on it without having any performance issues. I'm going to install Ubuntu as Windows 7 seems to hate my SSD... Windows 8 Developer Preview works fine however, and so does Vista! Haven't tried XP yet... No idea why I just told you all this! :P

  • @jojotjuh No. TRIM only prevents "unnecessary" writes to the SSD.

  • @jojotjuh i have been running xp pro on an NTEL SSDSA2M080G2GC since feb. havnt had any degrade in speed or perfomance, to blance out the non exitent trim feater for xp intel has a utility called the intel ssd toolbox to keep the ssd running properly, I turned off the hybernate/ sleep mode and moved my page file to a smaller 40gig ssd i had. have never had trouble with it

  • lol ludercris speed

  • That was pretty fast, cool.

  • my macbook air can boot faster than tht! :) u lose !

  • @boyuchuadaniel too bad you had to suck steve jobbs's dick to get it

  • @KriegKadaver hmm... i dont!! i have all the money in the world!! i can afford anything!!

  • @KriegKadaver you must know by now how ridiculous your statement is... right?

    Just in case you don't: Jobs = APPLE no part of this video has ANYTHING to do with Apple... Microsoft is Bill Gates. He blew Bill Gates.

    He gave Steve a handy for that iPhone I'm sure he has in his pocket.

  • @IcoNyx I can't tell if you're stupid or just really stupid. Read the comment that I replied to, it made a remark about macs. Also lose some weight.

  • @boyuchuadaniel troll elsewhere, everyone knows macbook airs are the lowest of the low.

  • @boyuchuadaniel

    My dick is bigger then yours! :) u lose!

  • Start > Run > Msconfig > BOOT.INI > /NOGUIBOOT

  • try it with Win7 and full load of programs not just fresh install

  • ssd's booting like a boss

  • Windows XP doesnt support TRIM.Beware off that.Its makes your SSD"s at the time very slow.You bedder put on Windows 7 ultimate or prof that will support TRIM and also SMART.succes.

  • my biostar post takes forever too. it takes longer to go through post than it does to load win7 and im only running a standard 7200rpm disk drive. I WANT SSD

  • even thought there is no windows load screen the bootup takes friggen 22 seconds!! thats slow!

  • @TheShiz00 that's because of long bios boot. motherf... motherboards manufacturers now implementing new startup tech, that says only 2-3 seconds of bios boot.

  • now reupload your video like it is now, after 2 years. Let's see if it starts in 22 seconds.

  • Is there no boot screen because its soo fast?

  • The key for this is 32GB and I can bet their price was stupidly high just get 2 16GB or so for the boot sector obviously in RAID 0 yeah the rest will run on SATA drives but its better than selling your car to get the same space for more speed, at least for now as the SSD prices are this high.

    Also with 4 drives its better to go RAID 10 or 0 + 1 though I don't know what the failure rate of SSDs is.

  • 58 people are poor jellyfags who've never used a SSD.

  • I have a single Intel 320 and it boots just as fast, all you gotta do is disable GUI boot in msconfig

  • And here we have, ladies and gentlemen, an empty desktop that has nothing running on startup, no programs or games installed, maybe not even drivers, nada. Boy, I should get rid of all the stuff I have on my hard drives just to enjoy a quick boot.

  • @fiddlebender88 Agreed. AND, it's only a dated XP! Who cares? Mine is even faster, less than a second. It's called, I always leave my PC on and just turn off my monitor. Linux never needs to be rebooted. Runtime is almost at a year now.

  • ааа лохи... у меня за 14 сек врубаетса))

  • interesting but install anivirus and all drivers, and then ever ssd cant help you ;p

  • Nice, im looking to set a 6 way SSD raid up in the near future, and its was interesting to see how fast it boots. as for those saying its not fake due to sound, you know that sound can be added afterwards ?

    I dnot belive this is fake though.

  • wth

  • Comment removed

  • I don’t think this is fake. I had an old rig, with a decent hdd at the time, with a 1.33 ghz Celeron, and integrated graphics. Clean boots took less than 15 seconds...

    But after I had my way with it boots could reach 2 minutes, regularly.... :(

    Hey poster, I have a disk filled with a TB of movies and software on an external HDD, sorta valuable. What RAID would you recommend for this? Oh and I hear people say RAID is not for backups, but this is like an archive disk that I don’t regularly use..

  • @j2ching If it's external you can't put it into RAID mode. Also if it's just for movie and software then RAID is not recommended. Higher chance for disk failure.

  • i have asrock motherboard which is support instant boot and when my monitor turn on im on the desktop

  • @Davidht64444z

    Dude, "Instant Boot" is really just a fancy sleep mode. It's nothing special.

  • lol

    how can i turn off loading bar boot screen i my Win 7 64bit?

  • @jarula29 u go into start->run->type "msconfig"->select second tab called "boot"->the select one of the falowing: No GUI(graphic user interface) boot;boot log;base video;os boot information

  • @jarula29 Upgrade to SSD. My SSD doesnt even give the windows logo a chance to finish before i'm at my desktop.

  • how about ssd with windows 98?

  • @SKULLxSNAPS

    ahahahahahahhaahahahahaha

  • still seems slow to me

  • I love Windows XP :)

  • nice, I don't know why you would be running windows xp with such up-to-date hardware?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @RayTech70 Im a Microsoft certified professional, and let me tell you something

    When you have an SSD, everything is a fair bit faster, so much infact, if you connect up 24 of them, you can do almost anything, as they can also be used as RAM, if you also add in factors such as RAM and processing speed, which play the biggest factor, then things become a bit more realistic

    now when you put all of these together

    its not fake

    and stop bullshitting

  • Dude, get Win7 or something, thats so much overkill for the xp xDDDD

  • @Fuice1

    windows xp is not overkill for SSD hou faster how better

  • හුකනවා නේ :O

  • I don't think its fake, a good SSD in RAID would be pretty damn fast

  • You shouldn't use XP with SSD's

  • HDD speed ~ 80-100MB/s

    good SSD speed ~ 250-270MB/s

    4x SSD raid 0 speed ~ up to 1GB/s

    It's really may be true

  • @coolracer57 You're wrong. A HDD has about 150/MB speed (sequential). And at boot time the bandwidth is not a significant thing, it depensd on seek time.

  • @tibby87hun

    100-150MB/s - anyway, and by the way HDD seek time ~8-10ms, SSD seek time ~0.1ms )

  • Comment removed

  • @coolracer57 Yes, so? I just said that the boot time doesn't really depends on the bandwidth, but it depends on the seek time.

  • @tibby87hun

    I have understood that you meant )

  • @coolracer57 Not to mention a clean install of windows XP is what 1.5GBs? so a raid would have that loaded ideally in 1.5 seconds...

  • @BoilMyBrownies

    It only in the theory. OS loading it not as linear copying.

  • I hate how everybody saying that its fake because it not. It happens to me to. SDDs are "Solid State Disks" which are faster and better than HDDs. If you get 4 SDDs and put them into a RAID 0 configuration it makes your computers performance increase by 4 times and if you put WINDOWS "XP" in a modern computer its obviously gonna start up in a snap.

  • Dont RAID your SSDs you fucing idiots!!!

    They dont support TRIM in RAID!!

  • @TheIrredeemable you sure know a lot don't you.

  • @ph10m

    Not really.

    If you use SSDs this should be one of the first things you learn.

  • Beating a dead horse, but definitely not fake, SSD's are ridiculously good.

  • why would this be fake noticed 4 drives raid0? ssd super fast anyway! awesome :D

  • Wow...i know how to pause a video too.

  • His version isn't even genuine ^^

  • @01sean The Loading time on a 4 times striped system is increased a lot, also SSDs are extremely fast, this is probably not a fake and also my XP needs a lot longer to boot, even as "new install".

  • @01sean My system is running windows 7 and has plenty of installed programs and it also takes 22 seconds to load to a usable desktop. You need to get yourself some SSD's to find out what you're missing out on. 0.2 ms response times, 500 MB/s read, 500MB/s write, and the performance doesnt drop like mechanical hard drives.

  • That would be even quicker on Windows 7 because of the use of the TRIM instructions. Striped SSD's are probably overkill though!

  • is not a fake. Its a video out the with the Gigabyte Iram. It boots much faster.

  • overkill.

  • - -

    4 sec

  • no prefetch + no gui boot = shortest boot ever.

  • A software RAID?

    Sir, I just threw up in my mouth!

  • lol

  • Disabled Gui Menü...

    Works to on Seven and co-.-

  • and..???? you can xp do that on a restart ... and i can make xp start under 10sec.. and thats from pushing the on botton - loging onto the intenet

  • For you silly noobs who say it's fake... listen to the audio in the background, that's not a edited overlay that's the camera's audio and it doesn't have a single slip of the beat. Hence: It's NOT FAKE! I mean cOMONNN! It's 4 Solid State drives in Raid 0!! This isn't that hard to believe. I have ONE SSD, and it Alone was just a tad slower than that when it was new! So stop sayin it's fake, u don't know what you're talking about.

  • @thelegendbullet937

    Or he could have just keep the same audio track and paste over an already booted system for the video.

  • @Spudeh10

    Granted, but lets be real... its four SSDs in RAID 0 lmao, my single SSD nearly boots that fast! It's really not that hard to believe lmao

  • @thelegendbullet937 It's fake.

  • @RayTech70

    It's really not... I've seen XP boot that fast in person, it's possible... especially with 4 SSDs! idk why people think it's fake? You gotta be pretty illiterate with PCs to think this is fake =/

  • @thelegendbullet937 As if you cannot record something and then cut the video independently from the audio.

  • @ProudafinoeL

    Omfg, what is it with people and totally missing the point? Yea, he could have edited it... but why bother. If you had a decent SSD, you'd know this is exactly how they boot XP.

  • @thelegendbullet937 it is so easy to play a track over a video. i could make a recording and put 5 different videos together and say they are the same thing. u are dumb. so for all u noobs. get a life...

  • @fojock

    Your comment has 0% grit, clearly you didn't read my last comment, or you just have a terrible comprehension level of reading. Gosh, you kids who don't know anything about SSDs keep commenting. I bet none of you have ever even owned an SSD let alone know it's potential! Stop talking about editing possibilities, that's So far off topic! Yes, we get the point.. it COULD be ad edit... but it's not, and if you knew anything about this stuff you would know that.

  • @thelegendbullet937 I myself have an OCZ Vertex 2 on a 2010 17inch macbook pro with 8gb of ram and a 2.88ghz processor. Even on mac software, which is less clunky than windows i still have a 20 second bootup.

  • @fojock

    Well there are a good number of reasons for that.

    1: Mac OS boots slower than windows XP on SSDs.

    2: Mac's "BIOS" is slower to put than an Award BIOS.

    3: The SATA controllers mac use are not configured correctly to achieve the kind of boot times you see here.

    4:It can tricky to get your configuration to boot as fast as this, but it is definitely possible, I've done with a Single Super Talent 32GB SSD.

    5: It's a laptop, they're slower in general than desktops.

  • @thelegendbullet937 I will not say if this is true or fake, but I have to tell you sir, that there are some editing programs out there, where you can put the audio you want on a pre-edited video.

  • @MoinaldoM9

    Lol, I'm aware... I have more than one. And if you watch my videos, I use that feature :P

  • fake and gay because you pause it 

  • Well, of course it's fake. Any normal person who wanted their computer to boot up quick would disable the POST screen.

  • @cowsys1 LOL andif you knew anything about computer, you would know POST ( Power ON SELF TEST ) has nothing to do with the hard drives ( SSD's ) in this case or the operating system. POST is handled by the BIOS, which again hast nothing to do with hard drives or Operating System. Once POST has run bootstrapping code is envoked which lests the OS know that everything is in place and working properly :-)

  • @emtildeath

    And you're a fucking idiot because you have no idea what I meant judging by your half-assed pretend-to-know-it-all response. Good day.

  • Lol, gentoo linux would boot in t=-1 on this hardware. Cause black hole, eventually sucking whole town in :O

  • its an example, if it can transfer files so quickly it doesnt even show the load screen imagine how quickly it can load a map on call of duty

  • dude pls dont make fake vids..

  • uber fake :)

    you cut something ou of the vid, cuz you always see the "welcome" screen :)

    thats the part where windows is loading all your acount bound services dumbass

  • @kanarie93 its 4 SSD's in RAID 0 you troll (where's the do not feed sign?)

  • you chopped the part at the end so who knows how long it took, and the blacked out part could have been a mod, but it still was hanging on that part..

  • Hahah its black flash at 0:13

  • @SeanBondWBB Look at the different camera angles during the text and when it's in Windows. lol

  • @ansonx10 hahaha, only just realised that.

  • @SeanBondWBB Definitely not fake, just stupid. Who the hell shuts down their computer now-a-days?

  • @doctormitch wtf are you on about, there will still be a loading screen no matter how fast your drives are.

  • @SeanBondWBB It's not fake.

  • @SeanBondWBB lol that aint fake. My single solid state drive is not far behind this set up in boot time. My bios is what delays the start up.

  • @jleeangelo And when the new fancy MoBo's come out soon with the new oh god forgot name now, but basically done away with BIOS and have a new E something or the other coming along this will boot much quicker :-)

  • @SeanBondWBB how was it fake?

  • @sadsismint cuz you saw a flash and you're at the end of the tunnel. it must be fake.

  • @bineverlast its not a fake.

    thats just how fast SSD's are. Especially in raid. I'm sure my machine woud do something similar if it didnt have a problem hanging on windows load. stupid gigabyte mobo.

  • @SeanBondWBB you think it might be fake?

  • @SeanBondWBB this isnt fake, you need to research SSD's

  • @SeanBondWBB It's not fake he's set it to use the no-gui boot.

    Windows 7: start > run > msconfig > boot > check "No GUI Boot"

  • @2slogan It's not windows 7 nub.

  • @UnrealGlider You can do it on xp aswel you twat

    Start -> Run -> msconfig -> BOOT.INI -> check "/NOGUIBOOT"

  • @SeanBondWBB It's not. It's 4x 32GB SSD in RAID 0.

  • @SeanBondWBB

    No kidding: I've been a computer guy for over 22 years and know fakery when I see it. Besides, booting Windows XP-- big deal... let's see it boot up Windows 7 64-Bit.

    And,l please: don't fake it again!

  • @RayTech70

    If that is true, then u r a lamer since 22 years. XP is 10 Years old, the entire datasize of the installation is about 700mb which u can copy in less a second with average speed of 250mb/s for one ssd. but with 4 ssds in raid 0... its not 1gb/s, theoretical it is, but the controller will not do it. its about 800mb/s, which stil is enough...PLUS quad core and min 4gb ram ddr3, its like copying it, if u start it... type samsung ssd awesomeness in utube....sry 4 bad english...

  • I say LCD > CRT , LCD has advantage over monitor size and resolution change and adjust, i dont care or need little more refresh rate or colors.

    Just google CRT vs LCD and you will se what i mean.

  • crt ftw

  • CRTs have better color though LCDs have made strides. They also have multisync, ie no native resolution. LCDs look from mediocre to shit if they aren't displaying a native resolution.

  • DONT DO THIS YOUR COMPUTER WILL BROKE!

  • @hunterwolf53 wtf?

  • If I count from what appears to be the end of posting bios, it's like 8 seconds. But I don't even think that's the end. I think it might be at that flash on the screen at 16, then it's only about 2 or 3 seconds to load it. But I have seen single SSD load windows in 7 seconds already. hmmm. Either way, it's fast. Does it skip the loading bar automatically because it's loading so fast?

  • huh no loading bar windows?

  • you better turn on the light

  • now if bios and motherboard manufacturers would focus on speeding up the POST

  • I can do this changing xp boot picture by the a desktop bmp.

  • Sounds like the best idea ever, two SSDs in RAID0. Never thought of it lol

  • Those SSDs are so amazing they actually log into the PC on their own!

  • fake

  • @RomanQo1979 and gay

  • How much of a benefit is it to skip the Windows boot screen if it takes the same amount of time to show all the raid shit.

  • @zacockerpball HAHAH...my point exactly...whats the point of skipping the xp screen if the time it takes to load xp is just as long(well u know what i mean)...i hate people that make performance vids or tutorials and miss the fukn point...

  • @zacockerpball SO simple. not just the boot, but everything else is that fast. open a program? SPLI-DOW! done. Distributing frames across an array of projects that are all controlled externaly? SKA-DUSH! Finished. Need to copy an offline file to a client uncompressed? BLOPBLOPBLOP! That 10gb file no longer takes a lunch break to transfer. Time=Money.

  • @ankoslitoflower um, for sequential transfers (10 GB files as you said for example), bunch of magnetic HDDs in huge RAID-0 will be both faster AND bigger (GBs) than a SSD of same price.

  • @ankoslitoflower time=money yes but SSD´s=money too o_O

  • @Fonsie85

    Well when your company charges clients $100/hr for your work on a computer. The cost of an SSD is only pennies in comparison to the money you will save/make in a year, by having faster response times from your storage device.

  • @ankoslitoflower "that 10gb file"? the one that consumes more than 10% of the average ssd's capacity? lol

  • @zacockerpball The benefit is more than what is shown. ALL your hd access requests are handled faster. ALL your programs load faster. Yes, your point has merit when you look at only the boot process, however the overall benefit is still great.

  • @zacockerpball That stuff is not raid shit. It's POST. Anyway i think this seems kinda fake. I will look more into it.

  • @zacockerpball Well, the raid 0 doesnt only effect the boot times, so that 3 seconds you wait for the RAID also benefits the entire system. Everything on SSD is atleast twice as fast if not three times faster.

  • ill shell out this kind of money for ssd, when it makes waiting a thing of the past. until then i'll stick with samsung f3 1tb drives that cost about 80 bucks and do everything just fine. versus u know at least a thousand bucks for 1TB of overpriced-state memory

  • @jonnieos I have just a small SSD (60GB) for my OS and games. I've got a 1 TB drive for storage of everything else. It's pretty great.

  • @jonnieos, SSD does make waiting a thing of the past already. The point was put windows and a few needed files on it to save time and leave less often used files on a secondary drive like the samsung. Only I'd rather pay $99 for a 1.5TB HD.

  • you're just using nogui boot under msconfig, nothing special here

  • Nice vid, is that on-board raid?? I have an evga x58 mobo, and I was thinking about using 4 32gb ssds too. Thanks in advance!

  • And Amiga OS does the same with old hardware without RAID and a standard 7200RPM SATA disc.

  • @sdsti, no it didn't. At least originally, It booted a puny under 1MB OS, and it didn't use SATA, but SCSI. I'm sure there's newer iterations, but anyone still using amiga has to be a little eccentric, lol.

  • Its funny how u have the Water Mark for window XP. Still using Trial Version of Window Xp. NOOB

  • Caugh caugh STANDBY..

  • @jdcrispe95 NO, standby would not show BIOS post

  • cathode ray tube

    the best

  • Omg that's fast. I I just crapped on myself.

  • Um... And how did you do that?

  • @x1341x crt are better than lcd.

  • @VirgleC yeah ONLY HD CRT's are better, normal CRT's are garbage!