Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @bhasinuscuscable

    Anna Hazare? xD

  • Hi Mishal, nobody is a born Mahatma. Only a few get the sense very soon, like Siddhartha (Buddha). Most of them have to fight against the animal inside them for entire life. I believe Gandhiji had defeated his inside animal very early.

    However, when time changes everybody (who has not defeated his inside animal) indulges into selfishness. It was Gandhiji and other leaders like him who gave the energy of fighting against British Raj. Not Dr. Ambedker or Mr. Jinha. They should have followed him.

  • so wht if he ate meat...so wht??

  • oh she is a Pakistani, and raised in the ''great'' Britain. No wonder ek to karela uppar se neem chada.

  • HIndu's didnt regard him as a leader muslims didnt scs dint. Aliens did

  • gandhi was waay ahead of his time

  • It is not the reporters fault, she is trying to do the documentary to the best of her ability. IT is just the muslim mentality, they have always been like that always will. We can't be worried about that, we should concentrate on bettering ourselves, focus on yourself.

  • wtf whar documen is this?

  • Please guys accept that this exposes no faults in Gandhi at all. He craved for meat as a young man before he fully developed his ideology. Hardly a criticism. He sought commitment to cause through Islam - so? This is nothing but the making of a philosophical superman. All great people have moral or spiritual or ideological humble beginnings.

  • Comment removed

  • This video all 8 of them is the most negative attempt criticize the great one . The journalist must be aware of using such strong words . The journalist just to gain popularity should not go so low . This person has insulted Gandhi by her strong words . Yet she acts as if she admirers him but its not so watching the full 8 parts I lost my full respect to her work . BBC must not have even considered such a documentary please i humbly request not to watch this video .

  • Comment removed

  • what is the point of bringing these kinds of silly things?i think 100% pakis are non vegetarian then why shouldn't you telecast them on bbc

    a very bad journalism

  • i love the multi cultural sandwich that is great britain,worlds clash in one country

  • This whole thing seems silly to me. Like, 'oooh, he may not have been a vegetarian when he was younger--*gasp*!' Even if that is true, the important thing is that he became one, na? I'm mean, he's just a human. 'Expose his flaws'? We all have flaws! Just because he wasn't perfect doesn't mean he should be picked apart in such a manner. The Pakistani tilt to this doc is unfair; someone impartial--neither Indian nor Pakistani--should have made this. It's very biased. I am disappoint, BBC. -_-

  • Moreover Gandhi's father was not a civil servant as stated in the 7th minute of this documentary. He was the Diwan of his region - a princely state.

  • This is a misleading, Pakistani ordealed documentary to discredit Gandhi. I have studied extensively his person (autobiography and biography) and can assure anyone that all accuses moved are inderogably FALSE !!! I am extremely dissapointed with a trustworthy brodcast company such as the BBC publishing lies. How dark the future prospects.

  • Husain is reporting over gandhi what for a Irony

  • mishal is a retarded bit*h

  • I've had a crush on Mishal for years.

  • @papasitoman wel bro u r not the only one...i wonder shes married or wht??

  • @papasitoman so did I, but she got married in 2006 and mom to 3 kids :)

  • I wonder what backward dessert religions of the so-called book would make of Jainism?

  • The very fact that Pakistan - the failed state exists is testament that ppl werent listening to Gandhiji.

  • The very fact that Gandhi was killed by an Indian disproves your point

  • how so?

    Im saying that Pakistans existence shows ppl werent listening to Gandhiji.

    Ur saying that since he was assassinated by a Hindu fanatic, proves that people were listening?

  • so when a hindu kills someone hes a fanatic but when a muslim does they're all fundamentalists. tut tut hypocrites

  • ok ok .. but ur still not clarifying what you said earlier?

  • define fanatic: Some1 marked by excessive enthusiasm for and intense devotion to a cause or idea.

    define fundamentalist: Some1 who takes the interpretation of every word in the sacred texts as literal truth.

    The lines are blurry, but the distinction is this: Muslims take the Koran as the literal word of God, which in itself is very dangerous. Looking at the history of Mohammad, all that can be really said of him was he was a great leader and strategist. Was he divine? Hard to say.

  • While a bunch of sand dwelling barbarians were busy chopping each others head off and fantasizing about virgins, the Indian sub-continent had already developed a vast repository of culture,philosophy and religious ideologies, far superior to the simplistic mumbo-jumbo that eventually came to be known as Abrahamic religions.

    Look it this way, civilization in the sub-continent had already developed to the point where they were experimenting the Karma Sutra, long before Abraham could fuk.

  • @oyePhoker XD nice !

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more