@MaskedMan66 The imagination is of course informed by the psyche, and I would suggest that a person who believes in Jesus fighting wars on distant metaphysical shores should definitely take a long think about their psyche and why they need to believe in such nonsense to justify their own objectively meaningless existence. Perhaps a psychiatrist would probably be something such a person might wish to consult, that or a science textbook.
@666deadman1988 You're making a lot of dogmatic assertions there, my friend, beginning with your hand-waving dismissal of spiritual belief as "nonsense," whilst simultaneously praising science as some kind of final determiner of everything. Whatever spiritual belief may (or may not) be, science is a merely human invention, and by that very fact prone to mistakes. And it has dropped some real clangers over the millennia.
Remember when everyone believed in geocentrism? Science taught that!
It's ignorance to deny Jesus without proof supporting your claim. 500 people saw him rise from the dead, therefore the logical man goes with what is proven.
@STEJTHEGREATEST Who were these 500 people? What were their names? Where are the verifiable historical documents that record this sighting (religious texts do not count because they are biased by their very nature and their authors are often unknown or disputed)?
Giving names wouldn't prove anything. You can't look up people of lesser fame who existed 2000 years ago, and you can't ask them more about what they saw. Also, the Bible is a mostly verifiable historical document because it's been believed for so long by so many. If it was wrong, people who lived through the times the Bible described would have known, and they'd have debunked it. People who claim they've disproved it never provide any substantial evidence to support their claims.
@STEJTHEGREATEST Well if that's the case, what about the Greek gods? They were believed in by many people for many more centuries than Christianity, yet no one today would argue that they existed or any story about them being anything more than mythology. Also, the Bible has many inconsistencies with established facts and even with itself. For example, it took the Israelites 40 years to reach Canaan when anyone on foot could reach it within a couple of weeks (people make the journey even today).
@666deadman1988 The tales of the Olympians, told and retold over time, contain many inconsistencies with each other, and there are many different versions of various stories. By contrast, the books of the New Testament have not changed a word in their entire existence.
@MaskedMan66 so there's only one version of the new testament, cause I thought that there was a difference between say the KJV and the New International
Also why is there not one shred of archaeological proof whatsoever that the Egyptians ever kept Isrealites as slaves or that any of the events in the story of Moses ever took place. Not one book, painting, hiroglyph or physical evidence of any kind backs up the outlandish claims of the Book of Exodus. I think if every firstborn son of every Egyptian family suddenly died that SOMEBODY would write about it.
There couldn't possibly be any physical evidence of the Israelites being kept as slaves by the Egyptians because DNA evidence doesn't last that long. Also, how can there be physical proof that God once parted the oceans for Moses? It's not like such an occurence would leave evidence, and seeing as how God is almighty, and can do things perfectly, it's feasible that he could do anything at all without leaving any evidence. He could have revealed himself to us, then wiped our memories of it.
Your comments reflect your ignorance of religion. If God is powerful enough to create the universe, then obviously he can make anything happen in it, therefore there is a lot of logic to the "God can do anything" defence. Even children know this.
@666deadman1988 A very old and a very stupid question. Of course He couldn't; as there is nothing more powerful that Him, He could not create anything more powerful than Him. Man can do that; we've created cannons, missiles, bombs, and suchlike, all of which are more powerful than we are. Real achievements, those.
There are in fact a few things God cannot do, such as not be God. But these few things are in no way a handicap!
There is no limit to God's strength, therefore even if he created a rock of unlimited size, he would still lift it. However, creating a rock of unlimited size would mean that the rock would be bigger than our universe, and that would destroy it, which is why it would be counterproductive for God to create it.
@666deadman1988 Of course they count, because they were written by the people who were there.
You may notice the specifying of the man Malchus as being the one who had his ear cut off by Peter and healed by Jesus. His name was given so that people of the time could hunt him up and get his confirmation of the event.
This song is so awesome it gives me goosebumps. General Martok gets his courage back and takes a level in badass with just one word. Thank you, DS9, for reminding me just why I love Star Trek.
That song sends shivers in my spine
Dormammus 3 days ago
@Dormammus I felt waves go through me also---that's truly a badass funkdified tune
aaronTNGDS9 2 days ago
0:41 - is this Geordi La Forge as a Klingon??
dankwarth 5 days ago
@dankwarth Yes!
dougdax 4 days ago
@dankwarth haha no
j1noble 1 day ago
What no lyrics and translation?? You P'TAACHH!!!! D:<
greymajickjedi 1 week ago
Isn't this the song from the interactive movie "Star Trek: Klingon" for the PC?
FekLeyrTarg 3 weeks ago
@FekLeyrTarg This particular video is from DS9
HereticalKitsune 2 weeks ago
@HereticalKitsune
Thanks.
Actually it was more a rhetorical question. This song was first sung in the interactive PC-Movie "Star Trek: Klingon".
FekLeyrTarg 2 weeks ago
i am a classic klingon.speak english.are 1 or 2 words i know.one is nugnegh
i learn we klingon don t interactive a lot its basic state your buisnes.you spoke tooooooo much as a human.
koioo2 3 weeks ago
Go Dax!!
CristianApostol 1 month ago
MajQa!
djtrunksta 1 month ago
:49 through 1:15 needs to be on an indefinite loop.
nikijad 1 month ago 3
Comment removed
KristinaTVfan 2 months ago
This is sort of like Klingon Haka.
bfallingstar 3 months ago 4
@bfallingstar A Maori mate of mine referred to Klingons as space Maori's lol.
ExplorerXIII 1 month ago 3
Silence!!! you argue over religion like a pair of ferengi pataK! Martok is being a badass .. Q'pla!
cmdrkhaine 3 months ago 9
cool episode, but they found the weakest actors in hollyweird to play klingons. Really? I mean, come on with that dude and his skinny little arms?
ndileonardo 4 months ago
Lyrics:
Koi keh-less pook load.
Koi Pook beh poo
Yoch bow math bow je shuv wee
Say moach chyu may ew
Mah shoov, mah nong, ej ma choch chew
Nee beh yin mahj ach wov, coo!
Bath ma cheth bejj, ej yo keej dahk
Vaav, poo ma de, muv pa rech, ma shoov tach
Koo ma mev, ko ma shoov tach, ma ov
B3ncavill 4 months ago
@B3ncavill Maj!!!
MaskedMan66 3 months ago
Klingons invented solid state drives, because regular ones got damaged when they slapped the panels while they sang.
j1noble 5 months ago 60
@j1noble Plus, they tended to pull the consoles out of the deck and hit things with them
weldonwin 1 day ago
All of these klingon songs have something about kahless in them
montgomery1971 6 months ago
@montgomery1971 He is like their Jesus afterall lol.
666deadman1988 6 months ago
@666deadman1988 More like their MInamoto Yoshitsune; Jesus's war takes place on the spiritual plain.
MaskedMan66 6 months ago
@MaskedMan66 Or on the imaginary one.
666deadman1988 6 months ago
@666deadman1988 No, that would definitely be the spiritual one. Psychiatrists deal with the imagination.
MaskedMan66 6 months ago
@MaskedMan66 The imagination is of course informed by the psyche, and I would suggest that a person who believes in Jesus fighting wars on distant metaphysical shores should definitely take a long think about their psyche and why they need to believe in such nonsense to justify their own objectively meaningless existence. Perhaps a psychiatrist would probably be something such a person might wish to consult, that or a science textbook.
666deadman1988 4 months ago
@666deadman1988 You're making a lot of dogmatic assertions there, my friend, beginning with your hand-waving dismissal of spiritual belief as "nonsense," whilst simultaneously praising science as some kind of final determiner of everything. Whatever spiritual belief may (or may not) be, science is a merely human invention, and by that very fact prone to mistakes. And it has dropped some real clangers over the millennia.
Remember when everyone believed in geocentrism? Science taught that!
MaskedMan66 3 months ago
It's ignorance to deny Jesus without proof supporting your claim. 500 people saw him rise from the dead, therefore the logical man goes with what is proven.
STEJTHEGREATEST 4 months ago
@STEJTHEGREATEST Who were these 500 people? What were their names? Where are the verifiable historical documents that record this sighting (religious texts do not count because they are biased by their very nature and their authors are often unknown or disputed)?
666deadman1988 4 months ago
Giving names wouldn't prove anything. You can't look up people of lesser fame who existed 2000 years ago, and you can't ask them more about what they saw. Also, the Bible is a mostly verifiable historical document because it's been believed for so long by so many. If it was wrong, people who lived through the times the Bible described would have known, and they'd have debunked it. People who claim they've disproved it never provide any substantial evidence to support their claims.
STEJTHEGREATEST 3 months ago
@STEJTHEGREATEST Well if that's the case, what about the Greek gods? They were believed in by many people for many more centuries than Christianity, yet no one today would argue that they existed or any story about them being anything more than mythology. Also, the Bible has many inconsistencies with established facts and even with itself. For example, it took the Israelites 40 years to reach Canaan when anyone on foot could reach it within a couple of weeks (people make the journey even today).
666deadman1988 3 months ago
@666deadman1988 The tales of the Olympians, told and retold over time, contain many inconsistencies with each other, and there are many different versions of various stories. By contrast, the books of the New Testament have not changed a word in their entire existence.
MaskedMan66 3 months ago 2
@MaskedMan66 Hah. The proverb of jesus and the adulteress was inventeed later, and shit bro. Tidbits move in.
danuisortiz 3 months ago
@MaskedMan66 so there's only one version of the new testament, cause I thought that there was a difference between say the KJV and the New International
1991Historybuff 3 months ago
Also why is there not one shred of archaeological proof whatsoever that the Egyptians ever kept Isrealites as slaves or that any of the events in the story of Moses ever took place. Not one book, painting, hiroglyph or physical evidence of any kind backs up the outlandish claims of the Book of Exodus. I think if every firstborn son of every Egyptian family suddenly died that SOMEBODY would write about it.
666deadman1988 3 months ago
There couldn't possibly be any physical evidence of the Israelites being kept as slaves by the Egyptians because DNA evidence doesn't last that long. Also, how can there be physical proof that God once parted the oceans for Moses? It's not like such an occurence would leave evidence, and seeing as how God is almighty, and can do things perfectly, it's feasible that he could do anything at all without leaving any evidence. He could have revealed himself to us, then wiped our memories of it.
STEJTHEGREATEST 3 months ago
@STEJTHEGREATEST Ah the old 'God can do anything' defence. My old adversary, it's been awhile. Kills any logical debate dead.
666deadman1988 3 months ago
And seeing as how none of you atheists have ever been able to refute it, that kind of makes you all look dumb. ;*/
STEJTHEGREATEST 3 months ago
@STEJTHEGREATEST No one can refute the 'Chewbacca defence' either, and neither is anymore ridiculously illogical than the other.
666deadman1988 3 months ago
Your comments reflect your ignorance of religion. If God is powerful enough to create the universe, then obviously he can make anything happen in it, therefore there is a lot of logic to the "God can do anything" defence. Even children know this.
STEJTHEGREATEST 3 months ago
@STEJTHEGREATEST Then let me ask you this: could god create a rock so heavy that even he couldn't lift it?
666deadman1988 3 months ago
Comment removed
MaskedMan66 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@666deadman1988 A very old and a very stupid question. Of course He couldn't; as there is nothing more powerful that Him, He could not create anything more powerful than Him. Man can do that; we've created cannons, missiles, bombs, and suchlike, all of which are more powerful than we are. Real achievements, those.
There are in fact a few things God cannot do, such as not be God. But these few things are in no way a handicap!
MaskedMan66 3 months ago
There is no limit to God's strength, therefore even if he created a rock of unlimited size, he would still lift it. However, creating a rock of unlimited size would mean that the rock would be bigger than our universe, and that would destroy it, which is why it would be counterproductive for God to create it.
STEJTHEGREATEST 3 months ago
@666deadman1988 "Chewbacca defense?"
MaskedMan66 3 months ago
@666deadman1988 Google the Merneptah Stele. There's a shred for you.
MaskedMan66 3 months ago
@666deadman1988 Of course they count, because they were written by the people who were there.
You may notice the specifying of the man Malchus as being the one who had his ear cut off by Peter and healed by Jesus. His name was given so that people of the time could hunt him up and get his confirmation of the event.
MaskedMan66 3 months ago
This song is so awesome it gives me goosebumps. General Martok gets his courage back and takes a level in badass with just one word. Thank you, DS9, for reminding me just why I love Star Trek.
MrSinister1979 6 months ago
alles krieger...seltsam,ich seh keine palas xD ^^ dachte,die sind imba
bernisweltredsun 8 months ago
General Martok is incarnation of badass in the last scene where he says "engage" !
sadailinikada86 8 months ago 38
i soooo want to learn this song!
AryzonaRose 8 months ago
He's got such a good singing voice... it's a pity they didn't have him sing more in the series.
countrylover961 9 months ago 3
I'm such a trekki nerd and I say that with pride!!!! lol
compdoc1977 9 months ago
is that worf?
Selmak24 11 months ago
@Selmak24 that's right Qapla!!
bgypupi 10 months ago
@Selmak24 YES!!!!!
afreedman1776 10 months ago
@Selmak24 HI'ja! :-)
WorfHadnagy 4 months ago
catchy
vezner 11 months ago