Study finds Paul Krugman is the most partisan economist. Krugman was the only economist to "significantly" change his stances for partisan reasons. Krugman has even gone so far as to contradict his own findings to bash Republican politicians. - Brett Barkley, Econ Journal Watch, May 2010
RepubliCONs enjoy the SAME exact "STIMULUS PACKAGE" that Craig, Foley and RepubliCANT Preacher Ted Haggard enjoyed! Indulge yourself; but, don't get too choked up about it! LOL! ~Ban Coulter
How did you suppose we pay for the debt we had before any of this, the 3.1 trillion spent by bush before Obama included in addition too the 11 trillion outstanding? We can't, we won't, if there is anything our culture has shown true is its ability to ignore/deny problems until they manifest physically. The debt will just be, it will be there ?forever,? they never had any intention of paying it all off only growing the economy proportionately enough to pay the interest.Unsustainability: our motto
@DrunkenPublicness Don't worry bro i am with you, and the country is going bankrupt, both parties are too blame.
I thought the US would go bankrupt by 2030 because of social entitlements I moved that up to 2025 after bush, now with Obama i have moved this up to 2020 an obama second term we might get 2015
Rational people should NOT listen to Maddow or Krugman. Both are constantly wrong
FourOnSix713 1 year ago
Man Madcow and KrugTard are soo stupid...
randyguitarman13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Study finds Paul Krugman is the most partisan economist. Krugman was the only economist to "significantly" change his stances for partisan reasons. Krugman has even gone so far as to contradict his own findings to bash Republican politicians. - Brett Barkley, Econ Journal Watch, May 2010
islandmuffin 1 year ago
krugman in an idiot
brewmaster95060 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RepubliCONs enjoy the SAME exact "STIMULUS PACKAGE" that Craig, Foley and RepubliCANT Preacher Ted Haggard enjoyed! Indulge yourself; but, don't get too choked up about it! LOL! ~Ban Coulter
mavrek47 3 years ago
How are we going to pay for this?
DrunkenPublicness 3 years ago
How did you suppose we pay for the debt we had before any of this, the 3.1 trillion spent by bush before Obama included in addition too the 11 trillion outstanding? We can't, we won't, if there is anything our culture has shown true is its ability to ignore/deny problems until they manifest physically. The debt will just be, it will be there ?forever,? they never had any intention of paying it all off only growing the economy proportionately enough to pay the interest.Unsustainability: our motto
OneHariSeldon 2 years ago
Thanks for the economic lesson, but my question was for rhetorical purposes and to find out how many "thumbs down" responses I'd receive.
I'm guessing that the 2 thumbs down responses were from the left side of the aisle, people who have yet to discover the meaning of "fiscal sanity".
DrunkenPublicness 2 years ago
@DrunkenPublicness Don't worry bro i am with you, and the country is going bankrupt, both parties are too blame.
I thought the US would go bankrupt by 2030 because of social entitlements I moved that up to 2025 after bush, now with Obama i have moved this up to 2020 an obama second term we might get 2015
mossretard 2 years ago
I enjoyed Mr. Krugmam knowledge on who's wrong. Both him and the legendary Peter Schiff.
BKDevious 3 years ago
I'm soooo glad he took a shot at the Chicago School of Business. They ARE the problem.
johnedwards1968 3 years ago 4
blah blah blah. if your fooled by any bush politics then f you!
why dont republicans take responsibility for helping bush murder millions and destroying america? fuk you republicans pigs!
kargenlewis 3 years ago 3
Love Rachel Maddow !!!
Moionfire 3 years ago 6