if this aint troll.. think about it, the aeroplane has thousands of liters of kerosene aboard, when that much fuel suddenly ignites the resulting explosion is huge.
Kattokaa nyt tota! Ei saakeli. Tää menee vähän liian pitkälle. No ei vaan, ihan jees video. Ei se WTC koskaan uskottavalta näyttänyt, ainakaan rakennus 7. Jos talot tulisi tulipaloilla noin nätisti kasaan, purkufirmat eivät käyttäisi räjähteitä. Mutta näissä malleissa kannattaa aina muistaa, että lujuus ei skaalaudu rakenteen mukana. Pulloposti selviää etelämeren myrskyistä, johon teräslaivat ovat uponneet.
Anyone that believes this bullshit video should look up verinage demolition. There are several videos here on You Tube. They clearly show that the top portion of a building can cause the collapse of the remaining structure without the need for explosives. The weight of the upper floors can and did cause the collapse of the remaining floors.
This video is a joke
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
it was an inside job but by the looks of it you fucking idiots in the comments hate the truth, there is more evidence that the US government took down the towers than there is bin laden even was planning and attack so maybe you fucking fools should shut the fuck up and think before you speak.
No tower can collapse due to jet fuel if no 767 struck it in the first place.
Watch "September Clues" for more info on the 9/11 hoax.
Shills can only post comments such as "lol" and "twoofer" because they are incapable of arguing the subject. The "lol" is eventually returned to them as their country goes bankrupt spending billions of dollars on fabled enemies.
LOL! Fucking Twoofers are hilarious! What would we do without a good laugh from these complete lunatics? Hahaahhaha, comparing snow to steel. Yeaaahh.. You really proved a point! Show this video to a Supreme Court judge and the most powerful prosecuting attorneys in the United States! This is PROOF 9/11 was an inside job! LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA! OMFG Twoofers, seriously, go back to trying to proove the existance on Aliens, Big Foot or try to find JFK's true assassin. You MORONS!
What the idiots who say things like "the towers were hollow" fail to get through their thick skulls is the the part that was supposedly doing the crushing was (if anything) more hollow than the bit it was supposed to be crushed.
They blather on about the buildings being 90% air and ignore that it was 95% air that was destroying it. In their world air sinks in water and lead floats on cooking oil.
You gotta like these guys.. you know why? Because they went out and questioned the whole theory for themselves. They put their minds to work unlike the rest of the sheep that believed the official story. Yea, its snow, so fuckin what. These guys being open minded raised a question and went out and conducted a test in an attempt to answer it. Some people just turn on the tube, and nod their head yes to anything that box says.
Don't trust the media or the government. Instead, trust someone who knows less than nothing about architecture, engineering or physics. Congrats on cracking the case, Sherlock.
Although simple, this is an excellent video because what happened to the towers is that simple. This shows the physics at work that cannot be ignored. The same physics that allows towers to be built. That put man on the moon and aircraft in the air. The physics that I would expect all my students to understand and recognize from observation and measurment. They would fail if they could look at the towers and conclude that Newton's laws were violated on this day alone after 300 years of proof.
@quirkyooable But they're not comparing apples to apples, therefore the experiment is meaningless. A tightly packed miniature snow tower is not the same as a hallow steel structure, regardless of size. It's been proven that a progressive collapse was not only possible but highly likely given the damage of the WTC and onsuing damage from the 1600-2000 degrees F. fires. The physics of a densely packed snow tower is different than a hallow steel structure. PERIOD.
At the very best, this video might prove that an airplane hitting a large building would not cause it to collapse instantly -- and sure enough, it didn't!
heh...I've seen some silly troofer theories (no one beats Richard Gage and his boxes tho) and this one is right up there as one of the dumbest. But then, these are troofers...not the brightest bulbs in the chandelier.
" These are a miniature model of the World Trade Center towers, by this demonstration you will realize how illogical their failure was during the 9/11 incident, people just lack the experience in falling skyscrapers and can't see the obvious" - ROFLMAO !!!!!!!!!
and of course the collapse of the WTC initiated at the points of the plane impact , NOT at the bottom .......but that shouldn't affect the test to much ...... LMAO
Point is that the same kind of material destroys same kind of material.
As the top falls, it's also crushed. So at theoretical maximum, it could dig into the body only it's own length. Wether it's a hollow cap to a hollow base or the solid one to the solid base.
1. A WTC with 1cm thick beams would not stand at all.
2. So there is some thickness of beam where it is just able to stand but at which it will collapse with a fly landing on it.
3. It follows logically that there is some thicker beam where it is able to stand, but the concrete above collapsing (or a billion flies) will cause total collapse.
A block of material is no fairer a recreation with 1cm thick beams.
@Styrgefilmi no the point is you have a completely false model and this is a freaking sham...though I'm laughing hysterically at your utter lack of intelligence. A wooden plane pushed into a block of snow by human hand...not a fully fueled 767 travelling 500mph smashing into a Tube in Tube designed building. Knock away some snow and not show the effect the fires had above and below the impact zone...please...stop...on second thought, don't, it's given me a good chuckle, keep it up!
And there my friend u r totally wrong. U just owned urself here. U r completely IGNORING the air inside the buildings. U simply just cant do that. Uve just been moved in "Richard gage dropping boxes" box;) (even a high school student KNOWS thats a retarded claim) Next winter build the same structure but instead of making it solid make it from little beams and observe what happens ok?
@LOLCATS3111 90% open space huh. Well i guess the massive 47 steel columns could not possibly have supported the towers after they were hit. Not to mention the hundreds of perimeter columns. Oh lets not forget that the flooring was tied to each of the before mentioned components, and the fact that all of it, every inch was coated in fireproof material. I guess none of that matters either huh? And I guess the tower core was hollow like the 9/11 commission claimed. Holy BATSHIT! LMFAO.
@LOLCATS3111 - If the three WTC skyscrapers were 90 % open space, also those parts of them that supposedly crushed everything below were 90 % open space. Empty space crushing equally empty space... LOL
Lumella tehty systeemi todistaakin paljon...Noi ei ees pala. Lentokerosiini leimahti tuleen ja palolevisi nopeasti kerroksiin hissikuiluja pitkin, jolloin hissien öljyt (ehkä jotkut muutkin öljyt) rupes palaan. Rauta muuttuu melkein yhtä löysästi, kuin vesi vähän yli 1500 asteessa, WTC palo yli 1400 asteessa, jolloin rauta ei sulanut, mutta alkoi taipua ja menettää kovuuttaan, joten tiedät miten siinä loppuksi sitten käy.
Yes it's a model but there is relevance. I'd like to see any model that shows the resut that we are supposed to believe happened on 911. I have never seen one has anyone else? I wonder why? I would not be beyond the capabilities of a civil engineering univertity to construct such a scaled down model of a wtc tower and and see what happens,
@drpepper576 I agree that snow has different properties. You are right. However, we were lied to about the towers. They were NOT hollow on the inside. There were 47 massive inner supports, made of steel. INSIDE and in addition to the supporting structure at the perimeter.
The fact that your trying to explain how false the collapse of the World Trade Centers was is horrifying. Thousands of people died, the fact that your trying to make a mockery of that is sick! It was a tragic day in history!
Fire Doesn't Melt SNOW!!111!!!1!! It's an Inside Jewb I tells ya!!
My goodness, I used to think Truthers had paranoid mindsets with ill thought out ideas, and I've completly NOT changed my mind after this video. Heiwa?
This demonstrates that it was NOT done with explosives. The narrator said the snow was soft and grainy. So why did the snow stay clumped together at the end, leaving a HUGE rubble pile?
The WTC twin towers left essentially NO RUBBLE PILE on 9/11. They were turned to powder in mid air. Also, the seismic signal was not sufficient to explain even a gravity collapse, much less a gravity collapse and explosives. If stuff is blown up, it must still fall to the earth. On 9/11, it did not.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Tällä äijällä ei oo mitään tajua kuinka isoja noi tornit oli, kumpainenkin oli kuin Suomalainen pikku kaupunki, siis ihan järjettömän kokosia rakennuksia.
~Kaikki mitä tässä videossa sanotaan on valhetta.
Siis melkein kaikki, uskomaton jäbä, abaut 3000 ihmistä kuoli WTC terrori iskussa ja tää äijä valehtelee siitä, hänen kaltaiset ihmiset ovat todella pahoja.
Alkaen ensimmäisestä väitteesstä; Tämä on pienoismalli WTC-torneista, lol.
Jesus Titty Fucking Christ. A snow sculpture is a valid comparison to the real thing. What are you dumbasses smoking? I saw a documentary on the History Channel about the whole conspiracy thing (a.k.a, The Fucking Wacko Group) and they featured a demolition expert. He said in order to take down buildings that are ten stories and under requires a couple of weeks of planning. His guess was 6 months for the WTC and he didn't see how it was feasible and how it could be done in secret.
You take that experts "comment" seriously about not being able to be done in secrecy?! LOL - the government does EVERYTHING in secrecy. PLEASE do me a favor (don't watch the mainstream media - or the history channel) it's there to feed you lies - please, take a little bit out of your time and look up: Loose Change on YT (when you do the search, please click on the second video that is listed). Please, if you're willing to watch government programming, please watch this video!
Keep digging. The History Channel edited a lot of the info out. Go to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. The security was down prior to 9/11,not to mention Marvin Bush was connected to the company that handled the security for the WTC as well. People did have access,and construction was taking place in the building,along with removal of asbestos. Computers were also being replaced.There was a lot of traffic in and out of that building,and security wasn't that tight.
Well, if it was a conspiracy, dont you think they would plan ahead? Do a little more research on the subject before commenting please. Research WTC building 7 and then let me know what you think.
actually i am trying to get you to back your shit up. if there is such a terrible conspiracy afoot. i want evidence. you're in the wrong room, witch hunts two lefts second door on your right.
so when you're ready to apply "science" (lols! can't wait) lets see it. seems with all your fine understanding of science you somehow missed peer review.
LOLZ! i love it when twoofers pull the research card as if anyone who disagrees with them obviously hasn't researched. that's dogma. i'm sorry but youtube, alex jones, and conspiracy websites are from from actual research. try actually reading the articles from the actual authorities on how the building did collapse. there is a reason that idiots like gage, s. jones, and company cant pass peer review. it's because their science sucks. but i guess the global academic community is in on it too.
"they" is paranoid shortcut to thinking. in the magical world of logical thought and scientific research if you make a claim you have the "burden" of demonstrating it. the internet is not a place for you to unload your nonsense and demand everyone prove otherwise or claim heresy because someone disagrees with you. that sort of thinking has only one purpose and that is to drag society back into the dark ages so we can entertain nonsensical notions like the ones 9/11 twoof submit.
"Any sources? Because I don't believe in the tooth fairy"
Sure! Here you go: tinyurl * com / cmggl
Quote from the source: "A large portion of the floor slabs above the 17th Floor progressively collapsed during the fire when the unprotected steel perimeter columns on the upper levels buckled and collapsed"
There you go, I've given you a source. Providing links to sources is something only we debunkers do. No twoofer has ever done that because there is no credible support for their fantasy.
Only a fool would thing by placing a plane on top of a 100 story building would bring it down at free fall speed. Just think about even the last 30 stories would slow it down. But it did not.
"Only a fool would thing by placing a plane on top of a 100 story building would bring it down at free fall speed. "
Holy cow, so you think we're saying the WEIGHT of the planes were what caused the collapses? You know, there are stupid people in this world, and then there's you. A whole new level of idiot.
Holy cow, so you think we're saying the WEIGHT of the planes were what caused the collapses? You know, there are stupid people in this world, and then there's you. A whole new level of idiot...
That's me.... a New level.. so it was the fire???
no it was the plane, no it was the poor engineering, no it was the shock wave from the planes hitting them, no it was the fires... nothing adds up but Oh well I am a Idiot......
It certainly wasn't the weight of the planes, doofus! It was and has always been the combination of the impact damage, damage to fireproofing, and fires. It's really not that hard to grasp.
the madrid tower's steel framed section collapsed. the rest was concrete. they were not built to resist fires after a plane crash. i'm guessing you're not a fan of science, but a basic scientific principle is that different circumstances will yield different results. its pretty pathetic how you guys just parrot these nonsensical claims without corroborating them. my arguments dont make sense? you just made a totally baseless claim about 707's and such. LOL! silly twoofers.
Thermite was found by more then one research group and yes Bush was forewarned before 911 by various foreign agencies. Mossad and the German BND being just 2 out of 32
thermite itself was found based on sulfur and iron spheres. sulfur exists in many common objects including computers. the iron microspheres have various possible sources including the concrete in the WTC. thermite itself has never been shown to be viable. the nano thermite was found by jones and harrit. their research was published in a crap journal that doesn't perform peer review. plus jones and harrit both said explosives were used yet no evidence
nice dodge hash. no one contends the jet fuel caused the collapse. the heat was generated by combustibles, many hydrocarbons from the plane and inside the offices, which led to the initial collapse. the jet fuel ignited the fires.
you couln't be anymore wrong about the collapse or the planes. the collapse initiated so fast because of the structural damage. yes the damage itself did not cause the collapse, it did play a role though. a 707 are drastically different plane. its like saying being hit by tractor trailer is the same as being hit by a F350. not to mention the 707 hit was referred to as a plane lost in fog, not as a weapon. so thanks for misrepresenting the facts.
wow! no one told me there was a strawman parade today!
1. WTC were built to resist a 707.
2. computer models are far more reliable as it takes in factors which scales cannot.
3. the rest is one of the worst examples of non sequitur that i have ever seen. no one said the jet fuel caused the collapse. the towes collapsed based on how the planes hits them. one came in on an angle which caused the north(?) tower to lean at collapse . the south (?) collapsed on a more level fashion.
The Madrid hotel building was burning for 26 hours and much hotter and only a few floors fell off. There are "truthers" and " believers". I stopped long time ago to believe in the Easter bunny or "good" government. You don't get rich or have immense political or military power by being "good". Norad just didn't "work" on that day and "neither" the Pentagons own air defenses lol and lol. And "nobody" warned Bush before 911 because he got 32 warnings only hahaha
And was the Madrid building builded in a way to withstand the impact of multiple airplane crashes? Stop displaying your ignorance. And was that part the fell of pulverized? And the steel parts ship as soon as possible to China so that there could be no investigation? Or was there thermite found in the dust or explosions seen and felt? Some people are real dumb! Don't you agree?!
but ik love your laundry list of moonbat claims. if you search for the "meteorites" of 9/11 the analysis shows its concrete layers of floors. in fact steven jones has said they saw chunks of concrete. the steel wasnt shipped as soon as possible. fema officials said they had enough time to investigate. no one found thermite inthe dust. jones has yet to get his findings corroborated in any legitimate fashion. not to mention you can't have unreacted thermite. thermite burns until the fuel is gone.
the floors which had a similar design did. the rest of the building a concrete core. that should tell you something.
Norad did work that day. the locations where the fighters scrambled from didn't have the ability to intercept in time as supersonic intercept wasn't permissible for civilian intercepts prior to 9/11. not to mention hindsight is always 20/20. the pentagon had no air defenses.
pfft, this isn't science. Look at the physics model made at Purdue University. It supports the NIST theory of collapse. WTC 1,2 and 7all had unique design characteristics which caused the collapse.
Purdue not science? It's one of the top research and engineering schools in the country. WTC 1,2 and 7 all were uniquely designed buildings that had weaknesses. You won't see that design ever used again.
Steven Jones, Niel Harrit, nor Richard Gage or any other AE911truth member has published a paper ina peer-reviewed journal. In fact, Jones created the Journal of 9/11 Studies so he could have his papers "reviewed" by other truthers lol. Then in response to criticism he submitted an article to the pay-to-publish Bentham vanity journal, where the "peer review" process is waiting for the check to clear.
So yes, to date there is not a single truther paper published in a real journal.
"Journal of 9/11 Studies" = J.O.N.E.S. = the name of Jones' personal website, where he launches personal attacks on anyone who does not agree with him.
Jones does not believe thermite was involved nor does he believe in the molten metal myth he promotes. Google the document his crew submitted to NIST and do a word count on "thermite" or "molten" or "thermate" and you will find he ommitted any mention of it. Why?
It's treason for a government agent to do psyops on another government agency.
even gage and the parade of idiots at A&E don't claim free fall. they either say near free fall or when they are more honest they say 2/3's. unfortunately gage had to find out that his voodoo physics don't work out so well when you apply actual math.
If you dont speak finnish you can not see that this man is a total lunatic or a great performance artists. All of his videos are about him fighting against the evils of nuclear pollution.
I don't know dudes, the front flip makes it look real to me! In fact, if you carefully view the tape, you can actually see George Bush doing a front flip out of AirFarce one, and landing on the first tower!! I'm totally serial!! Then, he jumped from the first, did a triple gainer, and landed on second tower, bringing it down! Yes, I see it now. He then screamed "FLAME ON" and streaked away under cover of dust and flame! Actually, I'm with MrEMR1976, these guys are out to screw the troofers!
Wow. That answers all my questions! Someone tell me what (if any) characterisitcs a densely packed snow man with a single 2x4 and a steel and concrete skyscraper have in common? I think someone needs a lesson in structural engineering. (Not to mention thermodynamics and physics.)
Congratulations. You've successfully showed everyone that an m-80 can blow up an igloo. And you've also shown us that a cardboard airplane will stick into the side of a snow tower. You folks are real fucking genuises. Go apply to MIT. The institution is lacking without you and your snow wisdom. PS: you fucking sound like a cross between an illegal mexican immigrant and an evil computer in a sci-fi flick. Now fess up. This was a joke? You're trying to make Troothers look stupid right? Jesus.
Don't bother arguing with idiots. If anyone thinks that this video proves anything besides explosives are good for making snow cones, then let them believe. It is not as if they will ever get gainful employment. I will say thanks, however, for proving that troothers are morons. Now, get back to the counter make sure that you push the fries.
So I guess the tensile strength of a snowman is now equivalent to steel and concrete? At what point do you think your demonstration exhibits anything scientific.
You are a bunch of Assholes and the narrator sounds like Dracula.
Wow, you guys rock. I always enjoy people breaking Mark Twain's rule: "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
You guys have certainly removed all doubt for me!
(of course, if this is subtle sarcasm making fun of the truth-tards, then my respect goes out to you!)
Then why didn't the WTC melt when the sun came out? This could be why there's only been 2000 hits on the video in 6 months. No one's interested in this sort of 'demonstration' anymore.
This has got to be a joke. Comparing a solid snow mass to the mechanical system of a tubular frame structure. Where was the explosion(s) at the WTC towers equivalent to the energy output at 1:03? Scale that up and we're talking of a pressure wave that would take out half of lower Manhattan. This is a demonstration of the truthers elementary logic...just scale something down - ignore internal framework and we have an accurate model. Here's a science lesson for ya:
"Poe's Law" strikes again.
geezerbill 2 months ago
if this aint troll.. think about it, the aeroplane has thousands of liters of kerosene aboard, when that much fuel suddenly ignites the resulting explosion is huge.
moptim 4 months ago
The fact that these guys are serious just makes this video even funnier.
mengelemd 4 months ago
Woa wow man! You almost had me convinced that the snow rectangles was acturally blew up! Thanks for telling em they were inside job lololololol
NobodyWatchesMyVideo 5 months ago
Comment removed
NobodyWatchesMyVideo 5 months ago
Kattokaa nyt tota! Ei saakeli. Tää menee vähän liian pitkälle. No ei vaan, ihan jees video. Ei se WTC koskaan uskottavalta näyttänyt, ainakaan rakennus 7. Jos talot tulisi tulipaloilla noin nätisti kasaan, purkufirmat eivät käyttäisi räjähteitä. Mutta näissä malleissa kannattaa aina muistaa, että lujuus ei skaalaudu rakenteen mukana. Pulloposti selviää etelämeren myrskyistä, johon teräslaivat ovat uponneet.
PahaLukki 5 months ago
No jee!!
Tippitapitus 5 months ago
Funny and creative.
Love,
DanUuNoel 6 months ago
hahahaa
Tomeltaja 6 months ago
Anyone that believes this bullshit video should look up verinage demolition. There are several videos here on You Tube. They clearly show that the top portion of a building can cause the collapse of the remaining structure without the need for explosives. The weight of the upper floors can and did cause the collapse of the remaining floors.
This video is a joke
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 6 months ago
Comment removed
12weasel100 6 months ago
it was an inside job but by the looks of it you fucking idiots in the comments hate the truth, there is more evidence that the US government took down the towers than there is bin laden even was planning and attack so maybe you fucking fools should shut the fuck up and think before you speak.
GamingLogics 6 months ago
Fuck whatever
polemonek 7 months ago
fucking terrorist !
Chowbizful 7 months ago
Comment removed
ShinobIHunteR666 7 months ago
Comment removed
ShinobIHunteR666 7 months ago
No tower can collapse due to jet fuel if no 767 struck it in the first place.
Watch "September Clues" for more info on the 9/11 hoax.
Shills can only post comments such as "lol" and "twoofer" because they are incapable of arguing the subject. The "lol" is eventually returned to them as their country goes bankrupt spending billions of dollars on fabled enemies.
ImyManz99 7 months ago
Way better than the garbage Purdue animation.
ImyManz99 7 months ago
Twoofers....at least they have comedy value
mikeyt34 8 months ago
@mikeyt34 Sheep.....I am suprised they could see the humour.
PackOfPeterJackson 7 months ago
LOL! Fucking Twoofers are hilarious! What would we do without a good laugh from these complete lunatics? Hahaahhaha, comparing snow to steel. Yeaaahh.. You really proved a point! Show this video to a Supreme Court judge and the most powerful prosecuting attorneys in the United States! This is PROOF 9/11 was an inside job! LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA! OMFG Twoofers, seriously, go back to trying to proove the existance on Aliens, Big Foot or try to find JFK's true assassin. You MORONS!
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What the idiots who say things like "the towers were hollow" fail to get through their thick skulls is the the part that was supposedly doing the crushing was (if anything) more hollow than the bit it was supposed to be crushed.
They blather on about the buildings being 90% air and ignore that it was 95% air that was destroying it. In their world air sinks in water and lead floats on cooking oil.
DarkwingScooter 8 months ago
Comment removed
DarkwingScooter 8 months ago
You gotta like these guys.. you know why? Because they went out and questioned the whole theory for themselves. They put their minds to work unlike the rest of the sheep that believed the official story. Yea, its snow, so fuckin what. These guys being open minded raised a question and went out and conducted a test in an attempt to answer it. Some people just turn on the tube, and nod their head yes to anything that box says.
siaharash 9 months ago
Don't trust the media or the government. Instead, trust someone who knows less than nothing about architecture, engineering or physics. Congrats on cracking the case, Sherlock.
mackbonham1 9 months ago
I hit "like" just cause this is so hilarious.
EGRJ 9 months ago
no wins without finns
grumpycheerleader 11 months ago
There were no windows on that plane. It had to be a military aircraft of some sort!
This is proof that the towers were brought down with a combination of explosives and a giant doing a belly flop. I bet he was a Jew...
steviemcsteve 11 months ago 2
Although simple, this is an excellent video because what happened to the towers is that simple. This shows the physics at work that cannot be ignored. The same physics that allows towers to be built. That put man on the moon and aircraft in the air. The physics that I would expect all my students to understand and recognize from observation and measurment. They would fail if they could look at the towers and conclude that Newton's laws were violated on this day alone after 300 years of proof.
quirkyooable 1 year ago
@quirkyooable Snow != Concrete and metal.
Towers were mostly open space.
Absence of hours of fire, which would definitely bring these "Towers" down.
The Square-Cube Law.
I could probably think of a few more.
You must be a terrible teacher.
EGRJ 9 months ago
@quirkyooable But they're not comparing apples to apples, therefore the experiment is meaningless. A tightly packed miniature snow tower is not the same as a hallow steel structure, regardless of size. It's been proven that a progressive collapse was not only possible but highly likely given the damage of the WTC and onsuing damage from the 1600-2000 degrees F. fires. The physics of a densely packed snow tower is different than a hallow steel structure. PERIOD.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
asiaa \m/
emerni 1 year ago
At the very best, this video might prove that an airplane hitting a large building would not cause it to collapse instantly -- and sure enough, it didn't!
doctorpsycho1960 1 year ago
what a pile of shit
boltjet135 1 year ago
Very funny. Thank you! Let's wait for somebody to turn this into some video simulation...
Love,
DanUuNoel 1 year ago
haha awesome
MysticalGrooveWTC 1 year ago
Comment removed
KimmoKuopio 1 year ago 4
This needs to go in Loose Change 5! We are on 5 now right?
Feyd01 1 year ago 6
heh...I've seen some silly troofer theories (no one beats Richard Gage and his boxes tho) and this one is right up there as one of the dumbest. But then, these are troofers...not the brightest bulbs in the chandelier.
jetboy33 1 year ago
this is pure genius
brabon1 1 year ago 4
" These are a miniature model of the World Trade Center towers, by this demonstration you will realize how illogical their failure was during the 9/11 incident, people just lack the experience in falling skyscrapers and can't see the obvious" - ROFLMAO !!!!!!!!!
LOLCATS3111 1 year ago
they must have learned from richard gage
Obelisk2290 1 year ago
Good job :)
GGPiggis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and of course the collapse of the WTC initiated at the points of the plane impact , NOT at the bottom .......but that shouldn't affect the test to much ...... LMAO
LOLCATS3111 1 year ago
of course these models ARE SOLID and the WTC was 90% OPEN SPACE ....... but that shouldn't affect the test ...... LMAO
LOLCATS3111 1 year ago 7
Point is that the same kind of material destroys same kind of material.
As the top falls, it's also crushed. So at theoretical maximum, it could dig into the body only it's own length. Wether it's a hollow cap to a hollow base or the solid one to the solid base.
Styrgefilmi 1 year ago
@Styrgefilmi
the point is that YOU ARE NOT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, your "experiment" is IDIOTIC, and anybody with half a brain would LAUGH AT YOU !!!!!!!
LOLCATS3111 1 year ago
@Styrgefilmi
Here`s the problem in simple logic.
1. A WTC with 1cm thick beams would not stand at all.
2. So there is some thickness of beam where it is just able to stand but at which it will collapse with a fly landing on it.
3. It follows logically that there is some thicker beam where it is able to stand, but the concrete above collapsing (or a billion flies) will cause total collapse.
A block of material is no fairer a recreation with 1cm thick beams.
RaymondCorrigan 1 year ago
@Styrgefilmi no the point is you have a completely false model and this is a freaking sham...though I'm laughing hysterically at your utter lack of intelligence. A wooden plane pushed into a block of snow by human hand...not a fully fueled 767 travelling 500mph smashing into a Tube in Tube designed building. Knock away some snow and not show the effect the fires had above and below the impact zone...please...stop...on second thought, don't, it's given me a good chuckle, keep it up!
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Styrgefilmi
And there my friend u r totally wrong. U just owned urself here. U r completely IGNORING the air inside the buildings. U simply just cant do that. Uve just been moved in "Richard gage dropping boxes" box;) (even a high school student KNOWS thats a retarded claim) Next winter build the same structure but instead of making it solid make it from little beams and observe what happens ok?
radeczech78 8 months ago
@LOLCATS3111 90% open space huh. Well i guess the massive 47 steel columns could not possibly have supported the towers after they were hit. Not to mention the hundreds of perimeter columns. Oh lets not forget that the flooring was tied to each of the before mentioned components, and the fact that all of it, every inch was coated in fireproof material. I guess none of that matters either huh? And I guess the tower core was hollow like the 9/11 commission claimed. Holy BATSHIT! LMFAO.
newtatguy 1 year ago 4
@LOLCATS3111 - If the three WTC skyscrapers were 90 % open space, also those parts of them that supposedly crushed everything below were 90 % open space. Empty space crushing equally empty space... LOL
Finnquirer 1 year ago
lol. hulluja ootte :)
Motormouthfly 1 year ago 2
BTW mikä on boeing 7607? Se oli 767 :) Sori oli pakko :DDD
oSaloFIN 2 years ago 2
Lumella tehty systeemi todistaakin paljon...Noi ei ees pala. Lentokerosiini leimahti tuleen ja palolevisi nopeasti kerroksiin hissikuiluja pitkin, jolloin hissien öljyt (ehkä jotkut muutkin öljyt) rupes palaan. Rauta muuttuu melkein yhtä löysästi, kuin vesi vähän yli 1500 asteessa, WTC palo yli 1400 asteessa, jolloin rauta ei sulanut, mutta alkoi taipua ja menettää kovuuttaan, joten tiedät miten siinä loppuksi sitten käy.
oSaloFIN 2 years ago
wow its pretty obvious snow has different properties than concrete. and the insides werent packed. a lot of it was hollow
drpepper576 2 years ago 20
@drpepper576
Yes it's a model but there is relevance. I'd like to see any model that shows the resut that we are supposed to believe happened on 911. I have never seen one has anyone else? I wonder why? I would not be beyond the capabilities of a civil engineering univertity to construct such a scaled down model of a wtc tower and and see what happens,
Zooney1 7 months ago
@drpepper576 I agree that snow has different properties. You are right. However, we were lied to about the towers. They were NOT hollow on the inside. There were 47 massive inner supports, made of steel. INSIDE and in addition to the supporting structure at the perimeter.
organisten 3 months ago
Tell me these idiots are joking....lolol
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago 25
@EdgemanLL2 Maybe Aye, and Maybe No
yakacm 2 years ago
The conspiracy is finally proven! Way to go guys!
:DD
NiksiSonni 2 years ago 3
this v ideo is best
sakkurae 2 years ago
The fact that your trying to explain how false the collapse of the World Trade Centers was is horrifying. Thousands of people died, the fact that your trying to make a mockery of that is sick! It was a tragic day in history!
jdiggy100 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck yo uasshole, i will SMACK YOUR ASS TO PIECES.
ITS THE RELATIVES THAT DEMAND A NEW INVESTIGATION TOO, YOU KNOW THAT YOU FUCKER HEAD SOON TO BE FUCKED UP?
sakkurae 2 years ago
Fire Doesn't Melt SNOW!!111!!!1!! It's an Inside Jewb I tells ya!!
My goodness, I used to think Truthers had paranoid mindsets with ill thought out ideas, and I've completly NOT changed my mind after this video. Heiwa?
ScottishAtheist 2 years ago
I'm another moron for 911 truth!
ConspiracyNut 2 years ago
This demonstrates that it was NOT done with explosives. The narrator said the snow was soft and grainy. So why did the snow stay clumped together at the end, leaving a HUGE rubble pile?
The WTC twin towers left essentially NO RUBBLE PILE on 9/11. They were turned to powder in mid air. Also, the seismic signal was not sufficient to explain even a gravity collapse, much less a gravity collapse and explosives. If stuff is blown up, it must still fall to the earth. On 9/11, it did not.
ItWasDEWed 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Toi On Se Ainoa Oikea Teoria Hieno Video Suomalaiselta
Waliluonti 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Tällä äijällä ei oo mitään tajua kuinka isoja noi tornit oli, kumpainenkin oli kuin Suomalainen pikku kaupunki, siis ihan järjettömän kokosia rakennuksia.
~Kaikki mitä tässä videossa sanotaan on valhetta.
Siis melkein kaikki, uskomaton jäbä, abaut 3000 ihmistä kuoli WTC terrori iskussa ja tää äijä valehtelee siitä, hänen kaltaiset ihmiset ovat todella pahoja.
Alkaen ensimmäisestä väitteesstä; Tämä on pienoismalli WTC-torneista, lol.
Täh?
KimmoKuopio 2 years ago
Is this serious?
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA
OMG... i'm so convinced !
*falls over laughing*
The twoof movement has advanced so far.
torrent29 2 years ago 3
OMG! These idiots are serious!
dsglop 2 years ago
Jesus Titty Fucking Christ. A snow sculpture is a valid comparison to the real thing. What are you dumbasses smoking? I saw a documentary on the History Channel about the whole conspiracy thing (a.k.a, The Fucking Wacko Group) and they featured a demolition expert. He said in order to take down buildings that are ten stories and under requires a couple of weeks of planning. His guess was 6 months for the WTC and he didn't see how it was feasible and how it could be done in secret.
TWGRY80 2 years ago
You take that experts "comment" seriously about not being able to be done in secrecy?! LOL - the government does EVERYTHING in secrecy. PLEASE do me a favor (don't watch the mainstream media - or the history channel) it's there to feed you lies - please, take a little bit out of your time and look up: Loose Change on YT (when you do the search, please click on the second video that is listed). Please, if you're willing to watch government programming, please watch this video!
WeAreTruth09 2 years ago
Keep digging. The History Channel edited a lot of the info out. Go to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. The security was down prior to 9/11,not to mention Marvin Bush was connected to the company that handled the security for the WTC as well. People did have access,and construction was taking place in the building,along with removal of asbestos. Computers were also being replaced.There was a lot of traffic in and out of that building,and security wasn't that tight.
javalily 2 years ago
Well, if it was a conspiracy, dont you think they would plan ahead? Do a little more research on the subject before commenting please. Research WTC building 7 and then let me know what you think.
jmartinez0427 2 years ago
actually i am trying to get you to back your shit up. if there is such a terrible conspiracy afoot. i want evidence. you're in the wrong room, witch hunts two lefts second door on your right.
so when you're ready to apply "science" (lols! can't wait) lets see it. seems with all your fine understanding of science you somehow missed peer review.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Its your job to seek the truth,
Its not the job of others to convince you,
Its a cover up, your not supposed to know
It take detective work and history research
and the knowalge that "They " Lie.
always look below the surface
for the true meaning
AR15Truther 2 years ago
LOLZ! i love it when twoofers pull the research card as if anyone who disagrees with them obviously hasn't researched. that's dogma. i'm sorry but youtube, alex jones, and conspiracy websites are from from actual research. try actually reading the articles from the actual authorities on how the building did collapse. there is a reason that idiots like gage, s. jones, and company cant pass peer review. it's because their science sucks. but i guess the global academic community is in on it too.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
"they" is paranoid shortcut to thinking. in the magical world of logical thought and scientific research if you make a claim you have the "burden" of demonstrating it. the internet is not a place for you to unload your nonsense and demand everyone prove otherwise or claim heresy because someone disagrees with you. that sort of thinking has only one purpose and that is to drag society back into the dark ages so we can entertain nonsensical notions like the ones 9/11 twoof submit.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Well said! Very well said!
WeAreTruth09 2 years ago
"i prob know more about science than you"
If you're a truther, then it is 100% certain that you don't know more about science than any of us.
thedman113 2 years ago
"What were the Pentagon's air defenses? "
Google is your friend. Use it
"Yeah, the steel ones."
Any sources?
Because I don't believe in the tooth fairy
Demetrenos 2 years ago
ahh yes twoof. it means claim all you want then ask for evidence to the contrary.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
""What were the Pentagon's air defenses? "
Google is your friend. Use it"
I did. It told me that the Pentagon did not have any air defenses on 9/11. Google is apparently NOT your friend! LOL!
thedman113 2 years ago 2
"Any sources? Because I don't believe in the tooth fairy"
Sure! Here you go: tinyurl * com / cmggl
Quote from the source: "A large portion of the floor slabs above the 17th Floor progressively collapsed during the fire when the unprotected steel perimeter columns on the upper levels buckled and collapsed"
There you go, I've given you a source. Providing links to sources is something only we debunkers do. No twoofer has ever done that because there is no credible support for their fantasy.
thedman113 2 years ago
Only a fool would thing by placing a plane on top of a 100 story building would bring it down at free fall speed. Just think about even the last 30 stories would slow it down. But it did not.
Tappedline 2 years ago
"Only a fool would thing by placing a plane on top of a 100 story building would bring it down at free fall speed. "
Holy cow, so you think we're saying the WEIGHT of the planes were what caused the collapses? You know, there are stupid people in this world, and then there's you. A whole new level of idiot.
thedman113 2 years ago
Holy cow, so you think we're saying the WEIGHT of the planes were what caused the collapses? You know, there are stupid people in this world, and then there's you. A whole new level of idiot...
That's me.... a New level.. so it was the fire???
no it was the plane, no it was the poor engineering, no it was the shock wave from the planes hitting them, no it was the fires... nothing adds up but Oh well I am a Idiot......
Tappedline 2 years ago
very good. next step is fixing it.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
"so it was the fire??? "
It certainly wasn't the weight of the planes, doofus! It was and has always been the combination of the impact damage, damage to fireproofing, and fires. It's really not that hard to grasp.
thedman113 2 years ago 2
only a fool would contend thats what happened.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
the madrid tower's steel framed section collapsed. the rest was concrete. they were not built to resist fires after a plane crash. i'm guessing you're not a fan of science, but a basic scientific principle is that different circumstances will yield different results. its pretty pathetic how you guys just parrot these nonsensical claims without corroborating them. my arguments dont make sense? you just made a totally baseless claim about 707's and such. LOL! silly twoofers.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Any evidence for what you say?
Thermite was found by more then one research group and yes Bush was forewarned before 911 by various foreign agencies. Mossad and the German BND being just 2 out of 32
Demetrenos 2 years ago
what evidence would you like in particular?
thermite itself was found based on sulfur and iron spheres. sulfur exists in many common objects including computers. the iron microspheres have various possible sources including the concrete in the WTC. thermite itself has never been shown to be viable. the nano thermite was found by jones and harrit. their research was published in a crap journal that doesn't perform peer review. plus jones and harrit both said explosives were used yet no evidence
grandmastershek 2 years ago
What evidence to you to tie 9-11 to Iraq? None.
Tappedline 2 years ago
who said i did? i would suggest carrying on your discussions with whatever imaginary person you started with somewhere else.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
OK I will.... Obama and I are taking right now.....
Tappedline 2 years ago
what exactly was bush told?
grandmastershek 2 years ago
nice dodge hash. no one contends the jet fuel caused the collapse. the heat was generated by combustibles, many hydrocarbons from the plane and inside the offices, which led to the initial collapse. the jet fuel ignited the fires.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
you couln't be anymore wrong about the collapse or the planes. the collapse initiated so fast because of the structural damage. yes the damage itself did not cause the collapse, it did play a role though. a 707 are drastically different plane. its like saying being hit by tractor trailer is the same as being hit by a F350. not to mention the 707 hit was referred to as a plane lost in fog, not as a weapon. so thanks for misrepresenting the facts.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
wow! no one told me there was a strawman parade today!
1. WTC were built to resist a 707.
2. computer models are far more reliable as it takes in factors which scales cannot.
3. the rest is one of the worst examples of non sequitur that i have ever seen. no one said the jet fuel caused the collapse. the towes collapsed based on how the planes hits them. one came in on an angle which caused the north(?) tower to lean at collapse . the south (?) collapsed on a more level fashion.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Designed to be hit by a plane says the architects. Well they were obviously wrong.
flatl1n3 2 years ago
The Madrid hotel building was burning for 26 hours and much hotter and only a few floors fell off. There are "truthers" and " believers". I stopped long time ago to believe in the Easter bunny or "good" government. You don't get rich or have immense political or military power by being "good". Norad just didn't "work" on that day and "neither" the Pentagons own air defenses lol and lol. And "nobody" warned Bush before 911 because he got 32 warnings only hahaha
Demetrenos 2 years ago
the section of the madrid that collapsed was steel supported. the rest was concrete. stop parading your ignorance around,.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
And was the Madrid building builded in a way to withstand the impact of multiple airplane crashes? Stop displaying your ignorance. And was that part the fell of pulverized? And the steel parts ship as soon as possible to China so that there could be no investigation? Or was there thermite found in the dust or explosions seen and felt? Some people are real dumb! Don't you agree?!
Demetrenos 2 years ago
but ik love your laundry list of moonbat claims. if you search for the "meteorites" of 9/11 the analysis shows its concrete layers of floors. in fact steven jones has said they saw chunks of concrete. the steel wasnt shipped as soon as possible. fema officials said they had enough time to investigate. no one found thermite inthe dust. jones has yet to get his findings corroborated in any legitimate fashion. not to mention you can't have unreacted thermite. thermite burns until the fuel is gone.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
"The Madrid hotel building was burning for 26 hours and much hotter and only a few floors fell off."
Yeah, the steel ones.
"Norad just didn't "work" on that day and "neither" the Pentagons own air defenses"
What were the Pentagon's air defenses?
thedman113 2 years ago
I guess the pentagon is just a setting duck....
Tappedline 2 years ago
"I guess the pentagon is just a setting duck.... "
As much as any building right next to an international airport is a 'sitting duck'.
thedman113 2 years ago 2
the floors which had a similar design did. the rest of the building a concrete core. that should tell you something.
Norad did work that day. the locations where the fighters scrambled from didn't have the ability to intercept in time as supersonic intercept wasn't permissible for civilian intercepts prior to 9/11. not to mention hindsight is always 20/20. the pentagon had no air defenses.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
What's so wrong about gravity?
It's like gravity is some kind of magical force to you Truthers.
Marty McFly: "This is heavy Doc."
Doc. Emmett L. Brown: "What's gravity got to do with it?"
WhyAskQuestions 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job!
kchomer1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol 911 WAS an inside Job!
boltville 2 years ago
pfft, this isn't science. Look at the physics model made at Purdue University. It supports the NIST theory of collapse. WTC 1,2 and 7all had unique design characteristics which caused the collapse.
flatl1n3 2 years ago
pfft! why bother with science when you can say "it looks just like a controlled demolition!" & "we are just asking questions!"?
grandmastershek 2 years ago
The Purdue study is not science..... Open you eyes, things do not fall the way the twin towers fall.
Tappedline 2 years ago
And gravity is a magical force to you because?
A: Buildings tend to collapse towards Earth
B: They magically don't fall towards Earth
C: They collapse going up
D: Just say "A" and be done with it. Because it's obviously stupid to talk about how they collapsed.
WhyAskQuestions 2 years ago
Purdue not science? It's one of the top research and engineering schools in the country. WTC 1,2 and 7 all were uniquely designed buildings that had weaknesses. You won't see that design ever used again.
flatl1n3 2 years ago
well you say so therefore it is!
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Finally I'm convinced. If Richard Gage's cardboard boxes was a starter for the truth, this is the main course. Pure science. Great work guys!
baxtrom 2 years ago 2
yup...this video just about sums up the average truther's understanding of anything academically related.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
That computer generated voice sounds almost natural. Very good.
sfaiku 2 years ago
I demand a new investigation to determine why the upper sections didn't slide off the snow piles!
thedman113 2 years ago
"Are you kidding me?
You haven't heard of Steven Jones, AE911 truth, or Niel Harris? "
I've heard of them all. Which peer-reviewed science or engineering journal were they published in?
thedman113 2 years ago
Steven Jones, Niel Harrit, nor Richard Gage or any other AE911truth member has published a paper ina peer-reviewed journal. In fact, Jones created the Journal of 9/11 Studies so he could have his papers "reviewed" by other truthers lol. Then in response to criticism he submitted an article to the pay-to-publish Bentham vanity journal, where the "peer review" process is waiting for the check to clear.
So yes, to date there is not a single truther paper published in a real journal.
SSHitMan 2 years ago
"Journal of 9/11 Studies" = J.O.N.E.S. = the name of Jones' personal website, where he launches personal attacks on anyone who does not agree with him.
Jones does not believe thermite was involved nor does he believe in the molten metal myth he promotes. Google the document his crew submitted to NIST and do a word count on "thermite" or "molten" or "thermate" and you will find he ommitted any mention of it. Why?
It's treason for a government agent to do psyops on another government agency.
ItWasDEWed 2 years ago
Snow and steel structures are completely different.
This video was a waste of good film footage.
WhyAskQuestions 2 years ago
I agree.
Steel is made out of air. The reason why the towers collapsed at free fall speed.
Snow is much harder to destroy
Demetrenos 2 years ago
even gage and the parade of idiots at A&E don't claim free fall. they either say near free fall or when they are more honest they say 2/3's. unfortunately gage had to find out that his voodoo physics don't work out so well when you apply actual math.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Free fall is true if you watch the first 3/4 of the collapse. You cant see the rest because of dust cover
Demetrenos 2 years ago
hence why debris precedes it violating all known characteristics of gravity. magic debris!
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Snow is more durable while modern steel buildings are intelligent. They would not want to damage other buildings in case they collapse.
I think the world trade center buildings committed suicide.
Demetrenos 2 years ago
yet they did damage other buildings. ahh the willful ignorance of truthers.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Ye Gods..I hate winter!
coffee300am 2 years ago
LOL At least one investment is still safe.
Companies that make psychotropic drugs.
Unfortunately there aren't any that will cure stupid.
zerotolerance4u 2 years ago
i feel stupider after watching this. but on the plus side it had pretty snow sculptures.
bracha86 2 years ago
That model was clearly of a Boeing 737.
SHENANIGANS!
kikker5150 2 years ago
Comment removed
kikker5150 2 years ago
It's true!
I replicated this experiment with two sticks of Land~O~Lakes butter, an M-80 and a dead dragonfly.
You can't fool science...;'}
Libslayer 2 years ago
I lol'd pretty damn hard at this one.. thanks
mikemay7 2 years ago 3
Tell me... Does the tower you exploded on the right look anything like the actual twin towers falling? No... here is the link:
/watch?v=KrUplpIDmOA
Saintskid228 2 years ago
Good Satire!
dphotomeister 2 years ago
The example sucks because the world trade center buildings were no made out of ice but were steel-frame building's with a heat sink.
Steel-frame buildings are known to collapse at free fall speed every 2001 years on September11
Demetrenos 2 years ago
you sir are a fool.
Huhuhuuu 2 years ago
My favorite part is where he swan dives into the snow tower.
HammerofHeretics 2 years ago
Comment removed
manorrd 2 years ago
If you dont speak finnish you can not see that this man is a total lunatic or a great performance artists. All of his videos are about him fighting against the evils of nuclear pollution.
infoexcavator 2 years ago
Unbelievable. I thought moonbats hibernated all winter.
bigenuffumbrella 2 years ago 2
I don't know dudes, the front flip makes it look real to me! In fact, if you carefully view the tape, you can actually see George Bush doing a front flip out of AirFarce one, and landing on the first tower!! I'm totally serial!! Then, he jumped from the first, did a triple gainer, and landed on second tower, bringing it down! Yes, I see it now. He then screamed "FLAME ON" and streaked away under cover of dust and flame! Actually, I'm with MrEMR1976, these guys are out to screw the troofers!
Mongrul 2 years ago
Wow. That answers all my questions! Someone tell me what (if any) characterisitcs a densely packed snow man with a single 2x4 and a steel and concrete skyscraper have in common? I think someone needs a lesson in structural engineering. (Not to mention thermodynamics and physics.)
rednovember23 2 years ago
But truthers do know fizziks. It's like, science man.
SSHitMan 2 years ago
lol some Antitruther website in germany actually use your video for proof that all truther are stupid this ignorant sheeples dont get it. look here:
infokriegtv wordpress com
nice vid thx
MrJohnnada 2 years ago
He he, I see. If I said anything it couldn't make it better for those suspecting my seriousness.
Styrgefilmi 2 years ago
How many of you morons actually think this is meant to be serious?
MadMonkey572 2 years ago 2
Congratulations. You've successfully showed everyone that an m-80 can blow up an igloo. And you've also shown us that a cardboard airplane will stick into the side of a snow tower. You folks are real fucking genuises. Go apply to MIT. The institution is lacking without you and your snow wisdom. PS: you fucking sound like a cross between an illegal mexican immigrant and an evil computer in a sci-fi flick. Now fess up. This was a joke? You're trying to make Troothers look stupid right? Jesus.
MrEMR1976 2 years ago
These 'engineers' are the same type of people who are running the Congress and White House.
luncheaterguy123 2 years ago
Don't bother arguing with idiots. If anyone thinks that this video proves anything besides explosives are good for making snow cones, then let them believe. It is not as if they will ever get gainful employment. I will say thanks, however, for proving that troothers are morons. Now, get back to the counter make sure that you push the fries.
frutig 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrEMR1976 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrEMR1976 2 years ago
So I guess the tensile strength of a snowman is now equivalent to steel and concrete? At what point do you think your demonstration exhibits anything scientific.
You are a bunch of Assholes and the narrator sounds like Dracula.
Kyoshi71 2 years ago
Is this a parody?
WeAreChallenged 2 years ago
It has to be.
HammerofHeretics 2 years ago
Is this a joke or a serious experiment?
If so where's your jet fuel?
batmangreen 2 years ago
Wow, you guys rock. I always enjoy people breaking Mark Twain's rule: "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
You guys have certainly removed all doubt for me!
(of course, if this is subtle sarcasm making fun of the truth-tards, then my respect goes out to you!)
goandfuckoff 2 years ago 2
you cant be serious? oh my god the infowars idiots have again proven how stpid they are.....
Corpucle 2 years ago
I think this is conclusive evidence of controlled demolition.
padbrit 2 years ago
Snow? Seriously???
BuzzE77 2 years ago
Ahhh... but it was a silent plane. Maybe that makes all the difference.
Ha!
Cute video! Thanks for posting.
ItWasDEWed 2 years ago
Then why didn't the WTC melt when the sun came out? This could be why there's only been 2000 hits on the video in 6 months. No one's interested in this sort of 'demonstration' anymore.
ScottSommers 2 years ago
This has got to be a joke. Comparing a solid snow mass to the mechanical system of a tubular frame structure. Where was the explosion(s) at the WTC towers equivalent to the energy output at 1:03? Scale that up and we're talking of a pressure wave that would take out half of lower Manhattan. This is a demonstration of the truthers elementary logic...just scale something down - ignore internal framework and we have an accurate model. Here's a science lesson for ya:
watch?v=NwFHEoiUZ7o
CRSWinston 2 years ago
you are a moron like terruy messian and you want me to trust you?
Obelisk2290 2 years ago
This video is a joke, right?
c6gunner 2 years ago
Mental illness ain't no joke. But it sure can be funny!
SSHitMan 2 years ago 3
oh shit another engineer.... shit ... the truth movment is really fucked now!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
s8rl 2 years ago 4
LOL. This is horrible...
Juniversal 2 years ago
Very funny! A good piss take of twoofer retardation
terrymanning1 2 years ago 6