Vandalism and Wikipedia

[MirrorballJack]

Bag full of garbage...

[BlackCowboy9]

@MirrorballJack I'll take it out for you.

[EchoBoomer1987]

I don't see why referring to Bobby Kotick as Satan is considered vandalism.

[ThePOKOkitty]

woll smoth

[happygamestvfun1]

it only traces IP addresses? what abotu proxies ect..

[TheSimsCreedGuy]

@happygamestvfun1

it blocks those IPs so everytime someone uses that proxy, he can't edit.

[happygamestvfun1]

@TheSimsCreedGuy can't mircosft just use their bot net?

[OSChrome]

Vandalism and Wikipedia = Epic Lulz.

[HardcoreGamer4Ever]

@OSChrome Yes!

[TheCoV3NanT]

@OSChrome xD

[XxTylerRBxX]

I love vandalizing wikipedia. :) It's so awesome. I mean everyone should feel happy that we're making the administators lives on that site much harder. :D They deserve it for being assholes towards new users and banning them for minor mistakes and also for spreading bullshit lies in articles. Wikipedia sucks cock, like the admins.

[BlackCowboy9]

@XxTylerRBxX I was welcomed by a vandal fighter, and he didn't block me for doing nothing. And it's a block, not a ban. Administrators normally block vandals. A ban is only implemented in certain instances. Honestly, vandalism amuses administrators. Sometimes the stuff that you put in articles is hilarious. So even though you're trying to tick us Wikipedians off, really, it's not working.

[XxTylerRBxX]

@BlackCowboy9 Lol that's great cause we all get to have a good laugh. lol

[ThePVGS1]

I actually used to be an editor on WP. I got blocked for somewhat "trolling" which I did not. WP sucks! I agree! I'll never edit there again! But I'll vandalize!

[SuperResound]

wikisucksssssssssssss

[AngloSaxonBob]

Wikipedia sucks. It's so abused. All you need is a large group of friends on there and you can put in what you like. Hardly anything on the site is true except the bio's of living people.

[BlackCowboy9]

@AngloSaxonBob Not really. Any material that isn't properly sourced by reliable sources is removed. Even if it isn't in a biography. I may not be much of an active editor on Wikipedia but I do know that it does its best to be reliable. And it works. Anything that doesn't have to do with the topic at hand, or anything that isn't properly sourced, is removed.

[wiltbloococo]

I patroll the Recent Changes on Wikipedia and I revert vandalism with Twinkle. I never tried WikiScanner but I don't think I need it, there was always that 'view history' option you could use.

[TheEliteNerd]

XD i just edited michael bubles page saying his dad was a bounty hunter from metroid XD

[MASHswe]

it´s kinda fun to edit wiki - pages.... LOL

I just edited a page of Marlena Ernman, a Swedish singer.....

(she sux)

[beancube2008]

What about if interest groups hire external culprits to do those dirty jobs for them. How do you trace them?

[rrtransformers]

fuck u! if it werent for those nerds, u might not be able to do ur homework on big al capone!

[ikfaldugod]

Fuck that hairy greasy wog.

[mataharibabi]

lililelia? lali lili lolilikuga sijik lali lali gukoa? lelalalalala la Ẵụla! lilukiga kiga kagu!(keju!)

[jonsan32]

I LOVE WikipediA... Truth and history have been written by those in power and by the victors of war for far too long. The world's collective voice can finally be heard (except for the Chinese, of course, due to their oppressively anti-WikipediA government.... sorry China)

[drrockof5]

@jonsan32 your a no good dirty admin right

[jonsan32]

I wish! Actually, that sounds like too much work :-)

Truth, as we've known it, is so concretely flawed, it's ironic that people try to criticize wikipedia for its correctable flaws.

[sp33dyphil]

@jonsan32 I love Wikipedia too, high five!