he had a real one that is not in question. What he did not remember was the choice given him to survive. Lucky he thought it better to return to the bed,
@ajs3939 i was having dental treatment i was hovering above myself it felt really weird i told them what was on top of there cupboards coz they didnt believe me i even drew it for them then they believed me
@handplanty obviously they could not get the doctor so they got this actor who knew him to talk. Jews and mystics also believe that the soul leaves the body when they sleep for a few seconds.
@RinAkurei I mean, 'what did the doctors think of the event?'. I meant to question the validity of the experience, because out of the body experiences are common, well-documented and even simulated in NASA's and other's high gravity simulators, where the blood is pushed out of the brain, causing first loss of color vision, then vision altogether (because the blood goes out of the eyes first), then out of body experiences, then consciousness, so to say it's divine or paranormal is dubious.
@RinAkurei haha, I agree they didn't make a real documentary :)
I know this because I'm a space geek, and any kind of geek for that matter. I spend a little too much time on youtube and wikipedia and hence I find these sorts of things
@handplanty "space geek" ? oh! so you are a net geek, right? cool. i wish i had time for that! ^.^ and actually, i thought you were some kind of doctor or something, lol.
and maybe i'm a bit of a space geek too - i have learned that Wikipidia can lie, but sound like a factual textbook - whereas, YT at least, you can hear the voices of people, hear if they lie or not, and it's easier to ACTUALLY analize instead of just beliveing.
@RinAkurei The thing with wikipedia is that technically it isn't allowed to post anything if it can't cite its sources. Those sources then appear under 'references' at the bottom of the page and usually they're online so you can read it for yourself. I could find more answers about, say, 9/11, UFOs, these OBEs here, Lockheed Skunkworks, Climategate and the AGW hoax, astrology or evolution on Yahoo! Answers or Google, but I wouldn't know for sure if it's entirely accurate, know what I'm saying?;)
@handplanty yup, i know exactly what your talking about. and sadly there are people who will put info up that actually is cometly farce, but it sounds factual. (like on Wikipidia, ANY website for that matter.)
anyway - so your suggestion is Yahoo! ? thanks, i'll try to go there next time i have questions.
@RinAkurei no that was exactly the opposite of what I was saying. I was saying that you shouldn't trust websites that can't site reliable sources. Although a reliable source is a good start, it doesn't provide context. For example, for climate you could go to NASA's department and read a lot of seperate articles, but if you go to wikipedia, you'll be redirected not only to NASA, but also to other surveys, institutions, organisations, etc.
@handplanty Opes, sorry for the misunderstanding. thanks for clearing that up.
Btw, how would you know about the NASA files and articles and such? what kind of research lead you there?
and sadly, i can't say anything else about Wikipida, because i don't go on often, and still haven't tried to put my own info their site. have YOU uploaded, or edited a page on Wikipida?
@RinAkurei Oh I'm just a highschool student, I don't do elaborate 'research' worthy of that title. I just come across it occasionally. NASA itself has a very good site of its own though. The way I get there is, I'm subscribed, on YouTube, to NASA's and ESA's official channels, so I follow those links to wikipedia. When it's interesting, I follow links from there.
My language has many small articles which, on the English version, are bigger, so I want to translate some. Haven't begun yet though.
@RinAkurei So that way, it doesn't act as a source for information in itself but as a collection, or metastructure, of lots of sources. You won't find that amount of references on Yahoo! Answers (of course I've seen SOME good answers with sources on there). My point was that googling doesn't work if you want things that are substantiated, you'd have to look for it not in wikipedia itself but in the sources it gives at the bottom of an article.
@handplanty Okay, thanks for the pointer, i'll go to Wikipida's source if i don't find my info instaec of google first, thanks.
and your right, i couldn't find any leads on Google for "blood-bond" but i found something that had nothing to do with video gameson Yahoo! thanks for your help! ^.^ know any other sites?
@RinAkurei If there are other sites, google will lead you there ^^
Oh, and one very interesting feature of Google is that you can type, for example
"Define: blood bond" and search on google, and it will query wiktionary, wikipedia, the merriam webster dictionary and lots of other sites and list all their definitions for you, it's great! Now, "blood bond" only has two entries, but "apollo" has 15. Just thought I'd share :D
@handplanty agreed, that's why i usually go to google, and it's less complicated. lol, thanks for your comment even though we've beenm having this conversation without you. ^.^
ah, so your check out "bolld=bond" huh? lol. btw, why "apollo" as your example, have you been looking in the NASA entries too? lol
@handplanty oh. btw - i've been trying to look up "blood-bond" (a vampiric term) but i can't find anything that isn't related to some ridiculous teen book, or a fictional movie, i'm trying to find a defintion. know anything?
he had a real one that is not in question. What he did not remember was the choice given him to survive. Lucky he thought it better to return to the bed,
foxee101 1 year ago
@foxee101 hes not the only oner to experience it it happened to me
ajs3939 5 months ago
@ajs3939 --email me please
holly807311 5 months ago
@ajs3939 i was having dental treatment i was hovering above myself it felt really weird i told them what was on top of there cupboards coz they didnt believe me i even drew it for them then they believed me
ajs3939 5 months ago
its all true but god has nothing to do with it
dancetool 1 year ago
What was the doctor's perspective on the healing?
handplanty 1 year ago
DMT Trip, I guess.
svanari 1 year ago
@handplanty obviously they could not get the doctor so they got this actor who knew him to talk. Jews and mystics also believe that the soul leaves the body when they sleep for a few seconds.
skyvardi 1 year ago
@handplanty it was an reinactment. so it's not nessisarily anyones "point-of-view".
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@RinAkurei I mean, 'what did the doctors think of the event?'. I meant to question the validity of the experience, because out of the body experiences are common, well-documented and even simulated in NASA's and other's high gravity simulators, where the blood is pushed out of the brain, causing first loss of color vision, then vision altogether (because the blood goes out of the eyes first), then out of body experiences, then consciousness, so to say it's divine or paranormal is dubious.
handplanty 1 year ago
@handplanty ah, so you wanted to know the doctors opinion in the matter. that's right! they didn't get EVERYONE'S opinon like a documentary should.
agreed, i am rather sceptical - open minded, but i want more detail - in the event.
how do you know so much about the metical termanology of the situation?
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@RinAkurei haha, I agree they didn't make a real documentary :)
I know this because I'm a space geek, and any kind of geek for that matter. I spend a little too much time on youtube and wikipedia and hence I find these sorts of things
handplanty 1 year ago
@handplanty "space geek" ? oh! so you are a net geek, right? cool. i wish i had time for that! ^.^ and actually, i thought you were some kind of doctor or something, lol.
and maybe i'm a bit of a space geek too - i have learned that Wikipidia can lie, but sound like a factual textbook - whereas, YT at least, you can hear the voices of people, hear if they lie or not, and it's easier to ACTUALLY analize instead of just beliveing.
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@RinAkurei The thing with wikipedia is that technically it isn't allowed to post anything if it can't cite its sources. Those sources then appear under 'references' at the bottom of the page and usually they're online so you can read it for yourself. I could find more answers about, say, 9/11, UFOs, these OBEs here, Lockheed Skunkworks, Climategate and the AGW hoax, astrology or evolution on Yahoo! Answers or Google, but I wouldn't know for sure if it's entirely accurate, know what I'm saying?;)
handplanty 1 year ago
@handplanty yup, i know exactly what your talking about. and sadly there are people who will put info up that actually is cometly farce, but it sounds factual. (like on Wikipidia, ANY website for that matter.)
anyway - so your suggestion is Yahoo! ? thanks, i'll try to go there next time i have questions.
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@RinAkurei no that was exactly the opposite of what I was saying. I was saying that you shouldn't trust websites that can't site reliable sources. Although a reliable source is a good start, it doesn't provide context. For example, for climate you could go to NASA's department and read a lot of seperate articles, but if you go to wikipedia, you'll be redirected not only to NASA, but also to other surveys, institutions, organisations, etc.
handplanty 1 year ago
@handplanty Opes, sorry for the misunderstanding. thanks for clearing that up.
Btw, how would you know about the NASA files and articles and such? what kind of research lead you there?
and sadly, i can't say anything else about Wikipida, because i don't go on often, and still haven't tried to put my own info their site. have YOU uploaded, or edited a page on Wikipida?
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@RinAkurei Oh I'm just a highschool student, I don't do elaborate 'research' worthy of that title. I just come across it occasionally. NASA itself has a very good site of its own though. The way I get there is, I'm subscribed, on YouTube, to NASA's and ESA's official channels, so I follow those links to wikipedia. When it's interesting, I follow links from there.
My language has many small articles which, on the English version, are bigger, so I want to translate some. Haven't begun yet though.
handplanty 1 year ago
@RinAkurei So that way, it doesn't act as a source for information in itself but as a collection, or metastructure, of lots of sources. You won't find that amount of references on Yahoo! Answers (of course I've seen SOME good answers with sources on there). My point was that googling doesn't work if you want things that are substantiated, you'd have to look for it not in wikipedia itself but in the sources it gives at the bottom of an article.
handplanty 1 year ago
@handplanty Okay, thanks for the pointer, i'll go to Wikipida's source if i don't find my info instaec of google first, thanks.
and your right, i couldn't find any leads on Google for "blood-bond" but i found something that had nothing to do with video gameson Yahoo! thanks for your help! ^.^ know any other sites?
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@RinAkurei If there are other sites, google will lead you there ^^
Oh, and one very interesting feature of Google is that you can type, for example
"Define: blood bond" and search on google, and it will query wiktionary, wikipedia, the merriam webster dictionary and lots of other sites and list all their definitions for you, it's great! Now, "blood bond" only has two entries, but "apollo" has 15. Just thought I'd share :D
handplanty 1 year ago
@handplanty agreed, that's why i usually go to google, and it's less complicated. lol, thanks for your comment even though we've beenm having this conversation without you. ^.^
ah, so your check out "bolld=bond" huh? lol. btw, why "apollo" as your example, have you been looking in the NASA entries too? lol
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@handplanty oh. btw - i've been trying to look up "blood-bond" (a vampiric term) but i can't find anything that isn't related to some ridiculous teen book, or a fictional movie, i'm trying to find a defintion. know anything?
Thanks for your time! ^.^
RinAkurei 1 year ago
@handplanty i tend to find MORE answers on Google then on Wikipidia sadly. What other sites do you trust?
RinAkurei 1 year ago