Thats what a 1990 bmw. And that is a 2000 somethin sivic TYPE s. So yeah. Why dont u get 2006 BMW m3 in there huh? yeah German Engineering might be expensive that you can only afford it that old. But they are the BEST cars on earth
to be honest to u guys,sometimes it's not the machine that matters but the skill of the person behind the wheel.volks it's a good car,no doubt about german engineering but how can i can smoked volkswagon golf r32 with just my humble honda fit that runs on1.5litre vtec 0-100km back in malaysia?i thinks it's the person who drove it matters and plus the condition of the machine......
ha ha honda shit yhea pay bit more here in uk you can buy a e36 328i less then 2k but honda costs 4 or 5 times more so why would you pay more to go slower than a 14 years old car lol i think what you pay for hond is not worth it
new ass civic with old ass bmw under 1 thousand dollars. damn what a competition. i love when hondas tryina beat bmw. it doenst matter wich one, even an 1988 bmw 525hahahahah
remmeber foo, the m3 even from the late 1980's would be too fast for any modern honda. the only bmw you can compare it low 3 series like 318is 323is, 325is thats all. m3 would be way to fast for honda, and i know it cause i liked hondas before, and i had one too. not bad car but not compariba to m series
m3 from any era is not too fast for an nsx, you do remember honda makes those?
my point was that who cares about one video showing an old cheap beemer against a newer honda, you bmw guys never see fault in comparing civics to bmw´s with much bigger engines and twice or three times the cost. then I don´t see the problem with one video showing the opposite!
and a those 318is, 323is and 325is are not cars that a civic type-R has to worry about! a little vti is enough for those!
I owned an nsx and it wasnt all that fast, in fact I sold it because I am sure an m3 can perfrom much better, the nsx also has tons of front end plow and mine was all stock so no excuses! BMW can beat Honda!
same yeared m3´s do not perform better then nsx. at best they perform equally but the nsx handles better. just plain fact.
and of course bmw can beat honda. they have many cars with huge engines that honda can´t compete with, and that´s just it they are in a much higher and more expensive class most of them.
but still people have had no problem in comparing them with civics? and get all excited when a expensive 325i edges out a 1.6l cheap ass civic! which in fact is a drivers race!
Given the NSX was in an even higher and much more expensive class(super car) even though it really wasnt one it can hardly out perform an m3. The m3 is better balanced and offers way more perfromance per dollar. The m3 can do nearly everything as good as the NSX and better in some areas and it does it with the ability to seat 4 and is safer too! I had an NSX and my brother had a e36 M3 so I know fromn experience which is better in real life not just by what is read!
in what aspect is an m3 better balanced then an nsx? the nsx is as balanced as a car can be and outperformes much more powerful cars on balance alone, so no the bmw is not more balanced.
the fact that one bmw offer a slight better performance per dollar over a honda is a mute point, they are not in the same class but are compared. people have to just get over it, one honda is more expensive then the bmw it is compared with boohooo! and by what are you going by when you say the bmw is safer?
All BMW cars are 50 50 weight balance and the NSX is not. The BMW has many engineering traits built in to make it balanced even while it is still able to carry 4 people have a roomy trunk and other luxaries the NSX does not have. I dont think its accurate to say people compare BMW to Honda what they are really doing is trying to make the Honda owners realize that they are not contenders with BMW and race them to prove and show them they are not.
dispite that 50/50 weight balance it does not outhandle a nsx with it´s mr layout.
and as I said they are not in the same class and should not be compared but they are and saying that one has 4doors and blabla does not matter.
honda is the worlds largest engine manufacturer and if I´m not mistaken they are 4th or 5th largest car manufacturer. must mean they do something right.
the numbers dont lie, 50/50 is the best possible, mid engine doe not priovide an extra advantage if the numbers are not 50/50, the components can be placed anywhere to seem more exotic but all that really matters pefromance wise is the balance and that is show on bmw to be mathematically as good as it gets. Now you satrt using hondas production as a defense, I never said they dont do things right I did say BMW can outperfrom any Honda! I also know cus I have had both!
yes that must be it, that is why Ferrari, lamborghini and porsche still rely on mr designs for their top models. or are they just stupid, cause you obviously know better?
and in your mind then a 316i bmw can outperform any honda even the NSX?? wow what a marvellous manufacturer????
BMW is much safer that a super low to the ground NSX with a short little front nose. BMW is more solid and was rated in crash testings where as the NSX being a speicalty car was not publically rated in crash tests so only those that crash an NSX know how safe it is and by then its too late. All I can say is I have Owned a NSX and had some things to say about it that are disapointing, like the front end plow, cars much cheaper can out run it and are more modern and safer and more usable!
and by then it´s too late, that something you have witnessed or your just basing on the short front end?
it is still today considered one of the greats and your opinion isn´t gonna change the endless reviews of journalists and race car drivers alike that the nsx is on of the greatest and will remain a legend for all times!
Say what you want about how great the car is but we were comparing bmw to the most expensive Honda and it still comes up very short, I never said its not good but it just is not as good as an M car. THink of this the original NSX cost 70k at its debut, the original m3 cost 30 somethingk much much cheaper, which car costs more now? an 80s m3 still runs in the mid 20's an early 90's nsx runs in the low 20s and ismuch newer that the original m3. Aonce chaper car costs more now than a once expensive
Why must you always go off topic. A direct look at the perfromance difference of bmw against Honda has nothing to do with Lamborhin ferrari or what have you becaseu they would blow the doors off honda too. You must realize that Just becasue NSX has mid engine does not mean it handles better than front engine. Its a show peice for exoticism. As I told you 50/50 is the best possible and the nsx is not 50/50. Lamborgin and Ferrari you mention as if the nsx is in that league, it isnt!
Another thing Ferarri has been in racing so many years and they only make production cars to fund their racing and their production cars are aimed only at the spirtit of racing. Ferarri also has many mid engine 50/50 wieght distribution models which shows they know its the best possible unlike Honda trying to insult the intelligence of its buyers and give them a car that they wont be able to spin out from so much weight being in the back for protection against that. Honda= Conservative!
You have difficulty making sense with what you read. I never said any bmw can outperfrom any Honda. I said BMW can outperfrom any honda. Meaning bmw outferoms the most expensive Honda. I never said which BMW thought so you are clearly not accurate with you language as if you were you would have picked up ojn that mistake you made. You aslo need to remove overbearing emotion that is displayed when you say stupid. It just showsyour hurt by the truth and that your emtion is cloudingyour reasoning
fact is that the m3 bmw does not hang with the nsx on tracks. just simply doesn´t. and your reasoning that you "think" that it will not do as good in crashes because the way it looks is just childish and doesn´t change the facts of races that these cars have been put in!
you can have your own opinion, but don´t let that cloud your mind. look up the facts.
eclipsed it and forced to disontinue it? what are you talking about? they stopped making the old nsx because it was just time it was an old design and it was time to move on and yes it does not compete with the newest sports cars, and it shouldn´t it is old. they were also designing a new one which was discontinued because of the global recession, just like they pulled out of f1 all in order to keep the company on track.
there your wrong. a lighter one won´t either? you have no idea what your talking about? weight has almost nothing to do with crash safety. almost all new small compact cars are safer then heavy pickups despite weighing like a third of their weight. weight has nothing to do with the design of crash impact zones and the technology put into cars! you don´t have hard fact and data and don´t put shit out on "I think" it´s not fact and you have no idea cause as you said there isn´t data on it!
ha ha honda shit yhea pay bit more here in uk you can buy a e36 328i less then 2k but honda costs 4 or 5 times more so why would you pay more to go slower than a 14 years old car lol i think what you pay for hond is not worth it
I already ecplained to you that the bmw cars have crash test results for anyone to see and the nsx doesnt. Also a car as low to the gorund as the nsx is naturally more dangerous as its less visible, more venurable in all kinds of crashes since most cars on the road are not that low, its at adisadvantage,hence the BMW being safer! The BMWis also more modern and modern cars are also safer than old ones. Anyhow I could say alot more but these comment boxes dont aloow much to be said so chew on that
omg, hahaha u talking out of ur ass....... nsx is not that fast......... my asss, for that statement u made, it shown that u are full of shit n never own a nsx.... oh also which nsx u own???? pleasee tell us., i would love to hear this.....ahhah
i would not know if they last longer i cant afford a fucking mer/ or a bmw!! i do know this tho i see alot of bmw's on the side of the roads all the time not so much mercedes...and never a porsche
I don't have to go anywhere. I've asked several service companies and car mechanics + all kinds of survays and all of them confirm what I've already said. Of course they drive german cars in germany, dah.
@orochimaruisugly we have a 2001 VW bora that is just..lets be honest...crap. It has been burning oil, AC failed a few times (and replaced), rear axle bearings worn out and you get uneven rolling sounds. As for mercedes obviously you are selectively not including the period between 2000-2008 when most of the cars from M.Benz were made in SOUTH AFRICA. UK satisfaction surveys rated them worse than hyundais. On the contrary i see people still driving around 1970 accords
@orochimaruisugly Um...... Accords were around in the 70s... The accord came out in 1976. Maybe you should do some research on cars, before you pretend to know anything about them. Just my 2cents...
@orochimaruisugly porsche and mercedes are reliable but volkswagon is realiable my ass if you talk of golf 1 and 2 yes but the vr6 and others olders golf arem't to much reliable,the new ones are shit it's embarassing to a golf 1 have brothers like golf 3,4,5 and 6...
@wheresurhat the companies do it differently, audi uses it only on the intake lobe...still holding back pressure from the exhaust side...dont know why they would do it that way...
@orochimaruisugly They do have vvt, but they are no where near the quality of hondas!! Nothing is in that matter!! They were one of the first to provide a vvt system in a production car!!
i drive a 1086 bmw 325 and it has over 220,000 miles on it and it runs stronger and better than most new cars today, i havnt had any problems with it. i will admit they are expensive to fix but bmw's are really reliable. make sure u know what your talking about before u talk bad about german engineering.
do the same race from 50 mph and you would have got your ass handed to you. these older bmws are slow off the line. i own an 88 535is. i get smoked quarter mile all the time once i race that same person in the higher gears or even on a track i leave em in the dust. not to mention how many hondas get 300,000 miles out of their engines. none that ive seen so japan technology aint got shit on the germans
lots of hondas get 300,000miles? i think the thing is both cars german and japenese are reliable german cars(i.e. vw bmw MERCEDES) are more expensive to fix... hondas are cheap reliable cars
yeah, everyone wants an M car, that's probably why people are so pathetic and put M badges on a soggy beemers from whatever year. so screw you and your slow ass penis enlarger.
oh man beemers are so gay, always leaning out of the driver window talking in a cellphone wearing sunglasses even on a cloudy day. japan technology always wins in the end
beemers are gay ??? what a load of total shite you talk man !!!! is that why most guys in the fukin world want an M car ???? eh ??? you fucking retard go back to fucking car school !!!! japan technology wins in the end ??? what utter fuckin crap you talk man, unbelievable !!! i smoke jap cars all week in my M3 so just please shut the fuck up, even the last skyline could just beat my ( non turbo ) M3 !!! why is that ??? why is that ??? even the supra can barely beat the M3 with 2 turbos, why ????
why the fuk all the civic drivers think that bmw is like a ferary? its not but oh well, ive been writing credit for my bimmer everytime i raced and acura or civic.
people that say civics are shit are either jealous, or trying to make a point to be different, or a american patriotic muscle car fanboy civics are amazing
WOW royclung is so right, that bmw is as old as honda itself, like royclung said go race a e46 and bring a box of tissue into your civic before you race
wow ur an idiot. a m3 is out of the class of a CTR.. the motor size is way different, but you gotta give credit to hondas with small motors keeping up with big litre cars. idiot.
civic is a great car as it can produce 197 bhp from a 2.0 engine that does not have a turbo or a supercharger, the BM has a 3.0 0r something to produce the same amount of power and look on you tube you will see the civic Type R leave the 98 -99 model m3 in a race...
Ya..considering that the BMW looks like an 80's 3 series. Pride yourself on that the E36 or 46 would blow your fucking doors off. Civics are junk. Same with the S2000 drivers that think they can keep up with bimmers...
Must be the radiation
sanek1995100 6 months ago
Thats what a 1990 bmw. And that is a 2000 somethin sivic TYPE s. So yeah. Why dont u get 2006 BMW m3 in there huh? yeah German Engineering might be expensive that you can only afford it that old. But they are the BEST cars on earth
sanek1995100 6 months ago
i love japan
onunato1 7 months ago
Woah toooo loud!
theoriginalopo 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Civic is the best and fastest car in the world for the people who never can even imagine having anything better.lol
alfx75 10 months ago
to be honest to u guys,sometimes it's not the machine that matters but the skill of the person behind the wheel.volks it's a good car,no doubt about german engineering but how can i can smoked volkswagon golf r32 with just my humble honda fit that runs on1.5litre vtec 0-100km back in malaysia?i thinks it's the person who drove it matters and plus the condition of the machine......
fauzinitrous 11 months ago
HONDA RULES
BABYGODZILLA2009 1 year ago
volkswagen aint reliable....and porsche sound expensive but it ain't that reialbe either
gangstahboyy 1 year ago
The slowest drag race I've ever seen.
p4horror 1 year ago
wo habt ihr bitte so ne strecke verdammt? is das in deutschland?
Testokrieger88 1 year ago
once again a lil lawn mower trying to prove something! you cannot beat the germans!
gun944 1 year ago
honda is more fast xD
XPTOPOWER 1 year ago 2
ha ha honda shit yhea pay bit more here in uk you can buy a e36 328i less then 2k but honda costs 4 or 5 times more so why would you pay more to go slower than a 14 years old car lol i think what you pay for hond is not worth it
kenanenver 1 year ago
You 2 below should just get a room..
turnerflux 2 years ago 11
I love how beamer entusiasts always have an excuse to why their cars loose..
Xtraordinary70 2 years ago
stfu all
aloozer 2 years ago
new ass civic with old ass bmw under 1 thousand dollars. damn what a competition. i love when hondas tryina beat bmw. it doenst matter wich one, even an 1988 bmw 525hahahahah
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
The bimmer lost buddy
Typhoontimmy 3 years ago 2
ricer, slow civic, CIVIC, sorry... race normal bmw that are still on road, that bmw is from museum
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
cherniybumer16
Whats soo rice about the Civic?
rehmant 3 years ago 4
and what bmw would that be then? a 320i even that one costs twice as much as the civic and doesn´t stand a snowballs chance in hell against it!
and if the type-R civic is slow what are compareable bmw´s then?
h1coupe 2 years ago
no, the typ-r cost more then 320.
323,325, 328
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
I do not know where you get that from, I checked prices in england and a ctr is around 18300 pounds, and even the 318i es is around 21500 pounds.
h1coupe 2 years ago
just like bmw guys want to race 1.6l hondas in their multi thousand dollars m´s?hahahhahahahhaha?
h1coupe 2 years ago
remmeber foo, the m3 even from the late 1980's would be too fast for any modern honda. the only bmw you can compare it low 3 series like 318is 323is, 325is thats all. m3 would be way to fast for honda, and i know it cause i liked hondas before, and i had one too. not bad car but not compariba to m series
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
m3 from any era is not too fast for an nsx, you do remember honda makes those?
my point was that who cares about one video showing an old cheap beemer against a newer honda, you bmw guys never see fault in comparing civics to bmw´s with much bigger engines and twice or three times the cost. then I don´t see the problem with one video showing the opposite!
and a those 318is, 323is and 325is are not cars that a civic type-R has to worry about! a little vti is enough for those!
h1coupe 2 years ago
I owned an nsx and it wasnt all that fast, in fact I sold it because I am sure an m3 can perfrom much better, the nsx also has tons of front end plow and mine was all stock so no excuses! BMW can beat Honda!
cheemooo 2 years ago
same yeared m3´s do not perform better then nsx. at best they perform equally but the nsx handles better. just plain fact.
and of course bmw can beat honda. they have many cars with huge engines that honda can´t compete with, and that´s just it they are in a much higher and more expensive class most of them.
but still people have had no problem in comparing them with civics? and get all excited when a expensive 325i edges out a 1.6l cheap ass civic! which in fact is a drivers race!
h1coupe 2 years ago
Given the NSX was in an even higher and much more expensive class(super car) even though it really wasnt one it can hardly out perform an m3. The m3 is better balanced and offers way more perfromance per dollar. The m3 can do nearly everything as good as the NSX and better in some areas and it does it with the ability to seat 4 and is safer too! I had an NSX and my brother had a e36 M3 so I know fromn experience which is better in real life not just by what is read!
cheemooo 2 years ago
in what aspect is an m3 better balanced then an nsx? the nsx is as balanced as a car can be and outperformes much more powerful cars on balance alone, so no the bmw is not more balanced.
the fact that one bmw offer a slight better performance per dollar over a honda is a mute point, they are not in the same class but are compared. people have to just get over it, one honda is more expensive then the bmw it is compared with boohooo! and by what are you going by when you say the bmw is safer?
h1coupe 2 years ago
All BMW cars are 50 50 weight balance and the NSX is not. The BMW has many engineering traits built in to make it balanced even while it is still able to carry 4 people have a roomy trunk and other luxaries the NSX does not have. I dont think its accurate to say people compare BMW to Honda what they are really doing is trying to make the Honda owners realize that they are not contenders with BMW and race them to prove and show them they are not.
cheemooo 2 years ago
dispite that 50/50 weight balance it does not outhandle a nsx with it´s mr layout.
and as I said they are not in the same class and should not be compared but they are and saying that one has 4doors and blabla does not matter.
honda is the worlds largest engine manufacturer and if I´m not mistaken they are 4th or 5th largest car manufacturer. must mean they do something right.
h1coupe 2 years ago
the numbers dont lie, 50/50 is the best possible, mid engine doe not priovide an extra advantage if the numbers are not 50/50, the components can be placed anywhere to seem more exotic but all that really matters pefromance wise is the balance and that is show on bmw to be mathematically as good as it gets. Now you satrt using hondas production as a defense, I never said they dont do things right I did say BMW can outperfrom any Honda! I also know cus I have had both!
cheemooo 2 years ago
yes that must be it, that is why Ferrari, lamborghini and porsche still rely on mr designs for their top models. or are they just stupid, cause you obviously know better?
and in your mind then a 316i bmw can outperform any honda even the NSX?? wow what a marvellous manufacturer????
h1coupe 2 years ago
BMW is much safer that a super low to the ground NSX with a short little front nose. BMW is more solid and was rated in crash testings where as the NSX being a speicalty car was not publically rated in crash tests so only those that crash an NSX know how safe it is and by then its too late. All I can say is I have Owned a NSX and had some things to say about it that are disapointing, like the front end plow, cars much cheaper can out run it and are more modern and safer and more usable!
cheemooo 2 years ago
the nsx is a 19year old desing!
and by then it´s too late, that something you have witnessed or your just basing on the short front end?
it is still today considered one of the greats and your opinion isn´t gonna change the endless reviews of journalists and race car drivers alike that the nsx is on of the greatest and will remain a legend for all times!
h1coupe 2 years ago
Say what you want about how great the car is but we were comparing bmw to the most expensive Honda and it still comes up very short, I never said its not good but it just is not as good as an M car. THink of this the original NSX cost 70k at its debut, the original m3 cost 30 somethingk much much cheaper, which car costs more now? an 80s m3 still runs in the mid 20's an early 90's nsx runs in the low 20s and ismuch newer that the original m3. Aonce chaper car costs more now than a once expensive
cheemooo 2 years ago
and if you really think that bmw depreciate less in price then honda, then we have nothing more to discuss. you just deemed yourself ignorant!
h1coupe 2 years ago
Why must you always go off topic. A direct look at the perfromance difference of bmw against Honda has nothing to do with Lamborhin ferrari or what have you becaseu they would blow the doors off honda too. You must realize that Just becasue NSX has mid engine does not mean it handles better than front engine. Its a show peice for exoticism. As I told you 50/50 is the best possible and the nsx is not 50/50. Lamborgin and Ferrari you mention as if the nsx is in that league, it isnt!
cheemooo 2 years ago
it is put up against them in races and class, so why would it not be in their league.
a 280hp car that competes with 500hp cars, would believe that would be enough to put it in that exotic class!
and those cars while they will win the nsx in a straight line, they do not on tracks(unless they are nothing but long straights)
h1coupe 2 years ago
Another thing Ferarri has been in racing so many years and they only make production cars to fund their racing and their production cars are aimed only at the spirtit of racing. Ferarri also has many mid engine 50/50 wieght distribution models which shows they know its the best possible unlike Honda trying to insult the intelligence of its buyers and give them a car that they wont be able to spin out from so much weight being in the back for protection against that. Honda= Conservative!
cheemooo 2 years ago
You have difficulty making sense with what you read. I never said any bmw can outperfrom any Honda. I said BMW can outperfrom any honda. Meaning bmw outferoms the most expensive Honda. I never said which BMW thought so you are clearly not accurate with you language as if you were you would have picked up ojn that mistake you made. You aslo need to remove overbearing emotion that is displayed when you say stupid. It just showsyour hurt by the truth and that your emtion is cloudingyour reasoning
cheemooo 2 years ago
there is nothing clouding my reasoning.
fact is that the m3 bmw does not hang with the nsx on tracks. just simply doesn´t. and your reasoning that you "think" that it will not do as good in crashes because the way it looks is just childish and doesn´t change the facts of races that these cars have been put in!
you can have your own opinion, but don´t let that cloud your mind. look up the facts.
and the facts are not that you have driven both.
h1coupe 2 years ago
Comment removed
cheemooo 2 years ago
eclipsed it and forced to disontinue it? what are you talking about? they stopped making the old nsx because it was just time it was an old design and it was time to move on and yes it does not compete with the newest sports cars, and it shouldn´t it is old. they were also designing a new one which was discontinued because of the global recession, just like they pulled out of f1 all in order to keep the company on track.
h1coupe 2 years ago
Comment removed
cheemooo 2 years ago
Comment removed
cheemooo 2 years ago
there your wrong. a lighter one won´t either? you have no idea what your talking about? weight has almost nothing to do with crash safety. almost all new small compact cars are safer then heavy pickups despite weighing like a third of their weight. weight has nothing to do with the design of crash impact zones and the technology put into cars! you don´t have hard fact and data and don´t put shit out on "I think" it´s not fact and you have no idea cause as you said there isn´t data on it!
h1coupe 2 years ago
Comment removed
cheemooo 2 years ago
BMW is a higer perfromance car company than honda with a much more extensive racing background end of story!
cheemooo 2 years ago
u dip shit, back then bmw work with honda to create their engine moron, n honda do make f1 top of its class, so how does honda suck???
kist420 1 year ago
ha ha honda shit yhea pay bit more here in uk you can buy a e36 328i less then 2k but honda costs 4 or 5 times more so why would you pay more to go slower than a 14 years old car lol i think what you pay for hond is not worth it
kenanenver 1 year ago
I already ecplained to you that the bmw cars have crash test results for anyone to see and the nsx doesnt. Also a car as low to the gorund as the nsx is naturally more dangerous as its less visible, more venurable in all kinds of crashes since most cars on the road are not that low, its at adisadvantage,hence the BMW being safer! The BMWis also more modern and modern cars are also safer than old ones. Anyhow I could say alot more but these comment boxes dont aloow much to be said so chew on that
cheemooo 2 years ago
omg, hahaha u talking out of ur ass....... nsx is not that fast......... my asss, for that statement u made, it shown that u are full of shit n never own a nsx.... oh also which nsx u own???? pleasee tell us., i would love to hear this.....ahhah
kist420 1 year ago
WOW yeah thats compitition...
=|
pinho93 3 years ago
i would not know if they last longer i cant afford a fucking mer/ or a bmw!! i do know this tho i see alot of bmw's on the side of the roads all the time not so much mercedes...and never a porsche
061284082383 3 years ago
that's probably why japanese cars always are first in all the reliability tests and german and french cars at the bottom, dork
sprakasticko 3 years ago
Volkswagon? Not reliable?
Mercedes? Not reliable?
PORSCHE? NOT RELIABLE?
Buddy, how many old jettas, old mercedes, and some old porsches do you see on the road?
And thats in fucking north america. If you went to germany you would see plenty of them.
Get your facts right before dissing german engineering
orochimaruisugly 3 years ago 19
I don't have to go anywhere. I've asked several service companies and car mechanics + all kinds of survays and all of them confirm what I've already said. Of course they drive german cars in germany, dah.
sprakasticko 3 years ago
everything you say is true. german cars are expensive to fix, and belive it or not here in the uk mercs are near the bottom of all surveys.
navydoubs1 3 years ago
Can't forget about Bugatti.
pojo205 3 years ago
@orochimaruisugly Thank you haha, I just noticed you naruto guy lol.
srrybunny 1 year ago
@orochimaruisugly Volkswagon ftw!!! lol, they actually own like everything!!1 haha
srrybunny 1 year ago
@orochimaruisugly thank you so much for that comment. kudos man
EseMeeklo 1 year ago
@orochimaruisugly we have a 2001 VW bora that is just..lets be honest...crap. It has been burning oil, AC failed a few times (and replaced), rear axle bearings worn out and you get uneven rolling sounds. As for mercedes obviously you are selectively not including the period between 2000-2008 when most of the cars from M.Benz were made in SOUTH AFRICA. UK satisfaction surveys rated them worse than hyundais. On the contrary i see people still driving around 1970 accords
nairdajun 1 year ago
@nairdajun I'm not going to waste my time on you, considering you think accord's were around back in the 70s.
If you're looking to start an argument, look elsewhere, because I'm feeding a troll.
PS: My dad's ML320 (2001 I MIGHT ADD) has 345,000km on it and its still going strong.
orochimaruisugly 1 year ago
@orochimaruisugly Um...... Accords were around in the 70s... The accord came out in 1976. Maybe you should do some research on cars, before you pretend to know anything about them. Just my 2cents...
Mustanglover691 1 year ago
@orochimaruisugly porsche and mercedes are reliable but volkswagon is realiable my ass if you talk of golf 1 and 2 yes but the vr6 and others olders golf arem't to much reliable,the new ones are shit it's embarassing to a golf 1 have brothers like golf 3,4,5 and 6...
SlipshT 1 year ago
@SlipshT
3 letters: T. D. I.
orochimaruisugly 1 year ago
4 letters, VTEC...
MrAlperry 1 year ago
@MrAlperry In case you didn't know, modern volkswagen vehicles use the same concept as Honda does, aka VTEC.
orochimaruisugly 1 year ago
@orochimaruisugly When you realize Audi invented it first, you'll shit bricks.
wheresurhat 1 year ago
@wheresurhat the companies do it differently, audi uses it only on the intake lobe...still holding back pressure from the exhaust side...dont know why they would do it that way...
2BarEG 1 year ago
@orochimaruisugly They do have vvt, but they are no where near the quality of hondas!! Nothing is in that matter!! They were one of the first to provide a vvt system in a production car!!
cg61000 11 months ago
@orochimaruisugly and now porsche is from germany
cellintel 8 months ago
my friend has an 1984 bmw 325 and it runs just fine--very reliable
theguythatcould 3 years ago
i drive a 1086 bmw 325 and it has over 220,000 miles on it and it runs stronger and better than most new cars today, i havnt had any problems with it. i will admit they are expensive to fix but bmw's are really reliable. make sure u know what your talking about before u talk bad about german engineering.
m-power:)
fannman12 3 years ago 2
280k here, just replace the timing belt and your good to go
EE325i 3 years ago
do the same race from 50 mph and you would have got your ass handed to you. these older bmws are slow off the line. i own an 88 535is. i get smoked quarter mile all the time once i race that same person in the higher gears or even on a track i leave em in the dust. not to mention how many hondas get 300,000 miles out of their engines. none that ive seen so japan technology aint got shit on the germans
ifameoner 3 years ago
lots of hondas get 300,000miles? i think the thing is both cars german and japenese are reliable german cars(i.e. vw bmw MERCEDES) are more expensive to fix... hondas are cheap reliable cars
DanAucoin 3 years ago 3
yeah, everyone wants an M car, that's probably why people are so pathetic and put M badges on a soggy beemers from whatever year. so screw you and your slow ass penis enlarger.
sprakasticko 3 years ago
oh man beemers are so gay, always leaning out of the driver window talking in a cellphone wearing sunglasses even on a cloudy day. japan technology always wins in the end
sprakasticko 3 years ago
beemers are gay ??? what a load of total shite you talk man !!!! is that why most guys in the fukin world want an M car ???? eh ??? you fucking retard go back to fucking car school !!!! japan technology wins in the end ??? what utter fuckin crap you talk man, unbelievable !!! i smoke jap cars all week in my M3 so just please shut the fuck up, even the last skyline could just beat my ( non turbo ) M3 !!! why is that ??? why is that ??? even the supra can barely beat the M3 with 2 turbos, why ????
houdini69 3 years ago
Play that game. Go strap a ironing bored to your fucking v-tec.
EE325i 3 years ago
why would I, seems like you've already done that to your brain. pathetic how you even compare other manufacturers to japanese ones
sprakasticko 3 years ago
a really lame video was hopeing to see the civic eating the dust of a E46 instead i see a new civic vs the same model BMW that my grandfather owned
shipzor 3 years ago
New vs. old, new vs. old, thats all I have to say my fellow viewers. Use your brain, there are no stock cars in this video. They both are modded.
weatherguy173 3 years ago
"Bimmers" are shit asses... fokers
PartycityClack1 3 years ago 3
yeah!!! the honda beat a bmw from the 80s thats awesome. and that isn't even an m3
POLLUSKY 3 years ago 2
why the fuk all the civic drivers think that bmw is like a ferary? its not but oh well, ive been writing credit for my bimmer everytime i raced and acura or civic.
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
civics rock so does terrance and philip
GILLYISTHEMAN 4 years ago
civics are all junk it doesnt mater what you do to them
youraveragecynic 4 years ago
people that say civics are shit are either jealous, or trying to make a point to be different, or a american patriotic muscle car fanboy civics are amazing
realityofheaven 3 years ago 3
civics are shit
Berrald 3 years ago
u sir are a fag
aracus13 3 years ago
its not even an M
hspnc777 4 years ago
it is so sad. the CTR only can competite with the old e30 bimmer. Try to race with the e46. all civic will eat dust.
royclung 4 years ago
WOW royclung is so right, that bmw is as old as honda itself, like royclung said go race a e46 and bring a box of tissue into your civic before you race
plfddoom 4 years ago
wow ur an idiot. a m3 is out of the class of a CTR.. the motor size is way different, but you gotta give credit to hondas with small motors keeping up with big litre cars. idiot.
siRGvtec 4 years ago 3
the BM got left CTR power!!
hardtarget06 4 years ago
I'm not sure what a BM is?
E30M34ME 4 years ago
short for the BMW, which is the red car in the video that couldn't keep up with the Civic type R which is a much faster and better car...
hardtarget06 4 years ago
honda civic > e30? since when? plus the civic is nearly 20 years newer... id hope it could hold its own against the marvel that is the e30.
chidsmf1110 4 years ago 2
civic is a great car as it can produce 197 bhp from a 2.0 engine that does not have a turbo or a supercharger, the BM has a 3.0 0r something to produce the same amount of power and look on you tube you will see the civic Type R leave the 98 -99 model m3 in a race...
hardtarget06 4 years ago 2
Well, thats an E30 M3 prolly 20 years old.
(2.3L-16v I4) - 195 PS (192 hp/143 kW) − 0-62 mph: 7.5 s. Top Speed: 146 mph (235 km/h)
(2.3L-16v I4) - 215 PS (212 hp/158 kW) − 0-62 mph: 7.0 s. Top Speed: 149 mph (240 km/h)
(2.5L-16v I4) - 238 PS (235 hp/175 kW) − 0-60 mph: 6.2 s. Top Speed: 154 mph (248 km/h)
nikolastwelve 3 years ago
nah its not an M3, looks like a 318is or a 325is, the fenders on the M3 were a lot bigger
zacafreakingriah 3 years ago
u suck dont be jelous
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
Ya..considering that the BMW looks like an 80's 3 series. Pride yourself on that the E36 or 46 would blow your fucking doors off. Civics are junk. Same with the S2000 drivers that think they can keep up with bimmers...
Boardthesnow09 3 years ago