Ive been flying this machine for 3 months now. After coming off an older twin with steam gauges and no gps,....it is a DREAM!!! You honestly forget that it has one engine. What other single engine airplane can haul 2+9, fl280 and go for 6.5 hours at 270 ktas....none. Well not all at once, but you get my drift. :-p
how is the pilatus space wise, does it have a bathroom? how much fuel does it burn an hour and why not just buy an older pilatus and stick a g1000 in it, is that possible, thx
The pilatus is good space wise. cockpit has ton of room, and the cabin is same as a b200 if not larger. Fuel burn at t/o is around 600 lbs/hr and high level cruise is around 300. The older pc-12 are great too, just the ng has a newer engine (more power longer), and cockpit is awesome. And yes they do have a lav.
its a turbo prop, not a falcon business jet, it is cool but adds another expense to an already expensive aircraft, and it probably takes all the joy out of actually "flying" the plane. thats just my opinion
I've been flying with a G1000 for a few years now, and the "glass cockpit" has added more joy to my flying. I feel safer, more informed, and more in-tune with the airplane. At this point, I would rather have a cheaper plane with glass, than A pricier plane without it.
@toomanystupidvideos I am not sure rather or not i prefer glass over traditional round dial. I trust both systems, however i am concerned about a glass cockpit system being difficult to operate. All those buttons just to control the computer seem confusiong. Should I learn in a glass plane or a traditional plane?
I've only flown Turbo 182s and used both glass and the older gauges. The G1000 DRASTICALLY changes the flight experience and situational awareness. Its also much more reliable and Very easy to learn
@toomanystupidvideos I agree they're fantastic. But i think people are losing the skill and art of flying because of all this advanced tech. There is always going to be a downside to technological advancements.
Mmmm those G1000's are yummy!
natebot321 1 year ago
new PC-12 also has FMS nice alike the proline
dwalker747 1 year ago
I's rather have an engine failure at Vr in the PC-12, then in a King Air or Metro, etc...
LordOfRot 2 years ago 4
@LordOfRot I'd have to completely disagree with that... I'd rather live than have an awesome chance of dying, but that's just me.
4fifty8 8 months ago
Ive been flying this machine for 3 months now. After coming off an older twin with steam gauges and no gps,....it is a DREAM!!! You honestly forget that it has one engine. What other single engine airplane can haul 2+9, fl280 and go for 6.5 hours at 270 ktas....none. Well not all at once, but you get my drift. :-p
crazyleedude 2 years ago 3
how is the pilatus space wise, does it have a bathroom? how much fuel does it burn an hour and why not just buy an older pilatus and stick a g1000 in it, is that possible, thx
LockerzUnlocked 2 years ago
The pilatus is good space wise. cockpit has ton of room, and the cabin is same as a b200 if not larger. Fuel burn at t/o is around 600 lbs/hr and high level cruise is around 300. The older pc-12 are great too, just the ng has a newer engine (more power longer), and cockpit is awesome. And yes they do have a lav.
crazyleedude 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Just one problem it has only one engine!
EBUTUOY2112 2 years ago
No no problem at all. The PC-12 safety record says it all.
Mickthebike 2 years ago
its a turbo prop, not a falcon business jet, it is cool but adds another expense to an already expensive aircraft, and it probably takes all the joy out of actually "flying" the plane. thats just my opinion
lovUSAhj 2 years ago
I've been flying with a G1000 for a few years now, and the "glass cockpit" has added more joy to my flying. I feel safer, more informed, and more in-tune with the airplane. At this point, I would rather have a cheaper plane with glass, than A pricier plane without it.
toomanystupidvideos 2 years ago 6
@toomanystupidvideos I am not sure rather or not i prefer glass over traditional round dial. I trust both systems, however i am concerned about a glass cockpit system being difficult to operate. All those buttons just to control the computer seem confusiong. Should I learn in a glass plane or a traditional plane?
zombiesurfer1 1 year ago
@toomanystupidvideos
I've only flown Turbo 182s and used both glass and the older gauges. The G1000 DRASTICALLY changes the flight experience and situational awareness. Its also much more reliable and Very easy to learn
shugacane 9 months ago
@toomanystupidvideos I agree they're fantastic. But i think people are losing the skill and art of flying because of all this advanced tech. There is always going to be a downside to technological advancements.
4fifty8 8 months ago
i agree 100%
jfreak91 2 years ago
I hope you know, that there's no engine burning less fuel than a Turboprop...
Airlinerfreak 2 years ago
Nice and new! But I like the old ones cockpit more!
tomsolomedia 2 years ago 4
I couldn't agree with you more.
homesqueeze420 2 years ago
How much would a top spec PC-12 Next Generation cost?
punchthedog 3 years ago
Not sure, but a 2007 model is offered at over $4 Million.
soquan 3 years ago
2009 Model Basic price $3.8 million, full spec is around $4.2 million with all the luxuries.
mingocr83 2 years ago
HAHAHA at the beginning i can hear the red arrows leader
N626DM 3 years ago
nice!
caca121112 3 years ago