@DutchDukeMan LOL you do research, ask anyone who has been around with computers forever, bulldozer sucks major cock and was a huge failure, stupid fanboy (Don't even say I am a fanboy, I have an AMD GFX Card)
@BronzeApples Wow calm down little boy, you're just to retarded to understand why Intel's 4 cores scored higher, and i'm not even gonna waste my time on a mad little pussy bitch like you
@ghano93 Ever tried one or are you just a fanboy. I like them both because intel gives me high performance but it costs a lot. AMD is very cheap and affordable and still has very good performance but not as much as Intel.
Lol I dont think it will look that old cause the x58 is still powerful, if you have a x58 setup this x79 upgrade just isnt a huge enough leap forward, I know cause I have the x79 setup, almost wish I didnt bother, I said almost
PEOPLE just because the bulldozer is faster and has more cores dousnt mean that it performs better! You want to know why Intels perform better? Well its because they have a kick ass chipset.
@assassin26764 The bulldozer's architecture is inefficient, that's why. The chipset has something to do with it, sure. But the reason why the Bulldozer is slow? - because the CPU is just slow. Well...when compared to others, at least.
@swordpalme um i did all that except rendering distance on far, cause who wants anything less, do you think i'm a retard? also i set everthing to make max fps and rendering distance to tiny and got 300 fps.
I've always wondered what gaming would be like with a 3960X, even though it would be total overkill. Getting 100+ fps in BF3 would be a sight to see lol.
Ok guys, I personally prefer AMD over Intel because AMD's processors are usually MUCH cheaper! (equvilent of fx4100 cost £100 more). I have the FX4100 which is pretty good value for money since i was on a buget and it's doing great! Remember...AMD has the world record for 'The Worlds Fastest Processor' (FX8100 @ 8.429GHz) :D
@ionizdgrunt2 oh noooooooo................ it does take $20 to make physical part of processor, bu where is mind labor? when do computer hardware engineers get paid? i guess that the were in school for 6 years and spent bunch of money on it so some idiot as you can come and say that they don't need to get paid.
THIS IS ONLY UPPER MID-RANGE PROCESSOR
Total cost = $250,000 / Engineer-Man/Year x 100 engineers x 4 years = $100,000,000 USD.
@Vladdy95THS ok????? i never even said that they dont need to get paid? read carefully lol, and computer hardware engineers get paid good money lol, up to 120k/year where i live. And gaming wise intel and amd processors really dont make a difference, mostly ALL of the games ever made were only made to use 2 processor cores...... i just choose AMD because you get better price/performance, i just THINK that INTEL is way overpriced.
Im guessing... that intel is quickly putting these 3960x and the 3930k out there for some extra money before they put out the new ivy-bridge with the 3D transistors :D
ALSO this isnt worth $1000 bucks??!!!?! i mean seriously does anyone know how much it takes to make this processor.... less than about $20 bucks..... not worth it especially when the 2600k beats it STILL in some benchmarks, and ive heard it sometimes isnt as good as a 2600k. if you an overclocker dont get this, get the fx-8150 ive seen people get it to 5.5Ghz xDDDD and this probably cant hit 5.0Ghz Stable.... so what do you think? $1000 vs. $270? i would choose amd any day over STUPID INTEL!
@MrPandawesome yeah, i guess i didnt check that over, a fab is probably very expensive on run costs, and electricity costs, and man hours of course :P
@totallykaos Just because you get more components that make up the processor, doesn't mean the processor is better. You're saying that because the FX 8150 has two more cores and a higher clock it's better than the i7 3960X...
Take the 2500k, a four core processor running at 300mhz less than the FX 8150 at around the same price - it wipes the floor with the bulldozer.
I'm no Intel fan boy - I want market competition to start up again...but i'll buy whatever product's the best...and it's not AMD.
@HippehMac i respectfully disagree. yeah the bulldozer was not what the hype made it out to be but realistically who really need that much power. the average user isn't going to know the difference in what they are using if they took "the pepsi challenge". do you believe what you hear on here or do you look at actual benches?
@blueovalfan23 The average user doesn't need much more than a Pentium II...if you look at the actual bench results, then the 2500k still wins in most scenarios. The point is, the Bulldozer is AMD's flagship - nothing tops it. Whereas, the 2500k is, and there's no denying it, an amazing processor, but there are options which still top it. Meh.
Let's agree to disagree, shall we? Or this discussion could go on for far, far too long.
@HippehMac i would like to see those bench tests because a fast google search is saying otherwise. plus the passmark scores says just the opposite. look it up, they're above i5s and below the i7s but give them a run. i'm not say the bd is a sandy bridge killer, i'm saying people are dumping on this chip because it isn't and realistically, the difference, most aren't going to notice. most of these people are intel or nvidia fanboys i think. i doubt you are either. anyway i agree to disagree lol
@somainglove If you want your PC to be good at gaming, then the 2500k is an amazing choice. If you want to do stuff like video rendering etc. then the 2600k is probably a better bet. I would still recommend getting the unlocked 'K' versions as it's so easy to get extra bang for your buck with the fool proof overclocking.
The price of that core is 990 USA DOLAR .. Its pretty expensive for the core .. However the core have 6 physical cores that can be using for the ultimate desktop gamer.. The Core can reach until 3.9 Ghz MAX turbo.. The core is the second generation from sandy bridge thats are known as SANDY BRIDGE EXTREME PROCESSOR
As mentioned below, I agree this is overkill for gaming how ever, its like buying a car with 500 hp,you don't need it, but you want it, and find ways to justify it. I've already been thinking of reason to justify for a another PC build of mine.
I wish I could just have 990x's laying around...
Mattucheese 2 hours ago
you fucking liar linus, intel xeon 55xx, 56xx series dont have heatsink too
UunonMopo 22 hours ago
@UunonMopo lol, calm down buddy... :-P
BioMoneculaR 19 hours ago
you dont even know what processors you have laying around? if i had a 990x in the open.... i would have it on king's chair.
halo56822 1 day ago
it's great for playing Counter strike lol
xX69julesXx 1 day ago
4x8gb vs 8x4gb ????
egumet2140 1 day ago
@egumet2140 less sticks work better; less chance of failure.
Plus, upgradeability path
silvervolt7 1 day ago
Can you do some vids about the 3820 please, I'm thinking of getting it
EmoticonMayhem 2 days ago
Shit, thats alot of money
Mr123pspfreak 2 days ago
my 775 is the crap of the 2011 :(
carrerincarrera 2 days ago
I counted 2010 pins on the processor. :D
Soda126 3 days ago 10
Comment removed
seroyer2 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Soda126 if you did It would not post.
seroyer2 1 day ago
Aren't the AMD Opteron's bigger?
DutchDukeMan 3 days ago
bulldozer cleans the sand of the bridge
ghano93 4 days ago
@ghano93 bullshitdozer*
BronzeApples 3 days ago
@BronzeApples Shut up you idiot, do some research
DutchDukeMan 3 days ago
@DutchDukeMan LOL you do research, ask anyone who has been around with computers forever, bulldozer sucks major cock and was a huge failure, stupid fanboy (Don't even say I am a fanboy, I have an AMD GFX Card)
BronzeApples 3 days ago
@BronzeApples Wow calm down little boy, you're just to retarded to understand why Intel's 4 cores scored higher, and i'm not even gonna waste my time on a mad little pussy bitch like you
DutchDukeMan 3 days ago
@DutchDukeMan lol umad??
BronzeApples 2 days ago
@DutchDukeMan To be honest bulldozer is a major fail considering how good it could've been.
JARMOPOWER 1 day ago
@ghano93 lol this processor actually runs FAAAAAAAAAARRRRR MORE FASTER!!!!
R3leaZ 3 days ago
@R3leaZ nah intel is dogshit
ghano93 2 days ago
@ghano93 Ever tried one or are you just a fanboy. I like them both because intel gives me high performance but it costs a lot. AMD is very cheap and affordable and still has very good performance but not as much as Intel.
R3leaZ 2 days ago
show it burning
KEEVVY 4 days ago
Great. Now I have to go look for TheMOTERBOARD's comment.
Bo0Mhe4d5hOT 4 days ago
yeah but will it run minesweeper like with NO lagg?
WoodyJYT 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I .....think its sexy....i want it.....PLEASE
MrNowwhatido 4 days ago
1k for this cpu? screw that shit. you can build a gaming rig which is a lot better than buying that overprice cpu.
PxKinRea 4 days ago
Saw this on new egg...$1000...
RandomMex14 5 days ago
AMD the best in PC? Not sure if serious or trolling...
MrQuietman1968 5 days ago
AMD is the best in PC but sux in laptops :(
Mohabrizk 5 days ago
I need some help...
I bought this CPU in Nov/2011
I have the C1 stepping version. Intel says its faulty. They released the C2 version recently.
Do you think I can get a replacement at the store even if its 4 mnts old and its still in a retail packaging NOT open.
TorontoPL 1 week ago
@TorontoPL Maybe ... or contact Intel directly for a processor replacement.
KulcanX 6 days ago
when i spot linus holding the cpu with two fingers... im like DROP DROP DROP DROP DROP DROP!
qOvob 1 week ago
two thousand
zero hundred
and eleven
ooo grammar
brianawesome100 1 week ago
its funny in 3 years this is going to be looked at what a Pentium 4 today is
PsiloCybinDreamX 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PsiloCybinDreamX LOL !
BananaGamer101 1 week ago
@PsiloCybinDreamX
Lol I dont think it will look that old cause the x58 is still powerful, if you have a x58 setup this x79 upgrade just isnt a huge enough leap forward, I know cause I have the x79 setup, almost wish I didnt bother, I said almost
kaztq 1 week ago
just received my 3930k today. I'm in epic astonishment
RyuKoomi 1 week ago
how does this compare to my qx9650?
JessicaSimpsonfan007 1 week ago
@JessicaSimpsonfan007 Almost 3 x better performance than qx 9650.
donvitas 1 week ago
in South Africa this CPU cost the same as the best MacBook air or a small MacBook pro?? WHY!!?
Caswalle 1 week ago
Stop dropping the cpus on the table D:
360faraji 1 week ago
I would buy this just for the sticker...
ghajaanan 1 week ago
"Largest CPU on the BLOCK"....wouldnt it be "UNDER the (water)BLOCK"
hartk5353 1 week ago
Ok, do will it run Mario?
paulicapopcorn 2 weeks ago
@paulicapopcorn stop joking you idiot! no one is liking your comment !!
azamtheawesome 2 weeks ago
but still this is too weak for minecraft :D
ItsReal2000 2 weeks ago 32
@ItsReal2000 nope
MrIwesseli 2 weeks ago
@ItsReal2000 faggots !
azamtheawesome 2 weeks ago 2
I have this :D
FordfocusROBL 2 weeks ago
bro how the intel heatsink
SUNHDV 2 weeks ago
for 1,000$ ill pass :D
MsDJFLIP 2 weeks ago 2
zero hundred hahahaha
nathangek 2 weeks ago
how much does your desktop cost ?
TheVindictiv3 2 weeks ago
I beat off to this vid
mouser9297 3 weeks ago
INTEL DX79SI ( LGA 2011 ) Extreme Series [VS] Asus Rampage IV Extreme I7-3960x ATI HIGH END
WHICH IS BEST SO HAVE CASH AROUND 15,000.00 US
kickingsaturdaymiami 3 weeks ago
@kickingsaturdaymiami asus is better.
1BYEBYE1 1 week ago
You look like a werewolf lol :D
pan19961 3 weeks ago
i still use i2, i don't have money
MrShoXProductions 3 weeks ago
@MrShoXProductions I still use Intel Core 2 Quad
candycandy57 3 weeks ago
@candycandy57 2.4 mghz quad core ;( man that core is so optimizable
MrShoXProductions 3 weeks ago
@MrShoXProductions i have the q8200 which is 2.33 ghz quad core
candycandy57 3 weeks ago
Why is standing on the CPU Costa Rica? O.O
GeneralSchultz 3 weeks ago
does it work with the gigabyte guerrilla, or any of the g1 killer series?
MultiSnoopDawg 3 weeks ago
is that better then i7 990x ????
MrSus102 4 weeks ago
@MrSus102 it is beter than 990x ... 3960x is LGA 2011 .... 990x is LGA 1366
AfizSobri 3 weeks ago
@MrSus102 This is basically a 2700k with 2 extra cores.
Orexll 3 weeks ago
@MrSus102 yes it is
candycandy57 3 weeks ago
@MrSus102 yeah man this is the best processor you can get right now
buzz9961 3 days ago
1:20 British Linus!!!
Sunny6602 4 weeks ago
I hope this thing mistakenly ships to my house. :)
arjennovic 4 weeks ago 2
This is the CPU to get.....if you are willing to chop your nuts of and sell them on ebay for a kizillion fucking dollars!
HaydenSpeed 4 weeks ago
1:18.. not 1.20....
HEY8461 1 month ago
1:20 Lol
HEY8461 1 month ago
What i wouldn't do to get a CPU like this!!!!!
Cristi243 1 month ago
A $1000 CPU that doesn't have a heatsink? WTF?
narcoti 1 month ago in playlist More videos from LinusTechTips
@narcoti AHHHHAHAHAHAHA welcome to Intel! Home of the ripoff! Over 1 billion served!
But really who is gona buy this and NOT use some kind of more better aftermarket cooling. They should just include their water cooler thou.
Tro1086 2 weeks ago
how does on make enough money to live comfortably AND have this processor for gaming...?
well..you just gotta be a bad person with a goal and without empathy ...i wish i could do it XD
TheDJSTALKER 1 month ago
hey, someone pls tell me, my i7 2600 has 8 cores, not 4, why?
MrM3MIX 1 month ago
@MrM3MIX hyper threading
benbelmour 1 month ago
@benbelmour whats that?
MrM3MIX 1 month ago
@MrM3MIX it has 4 physical cores but using hyperthreading to boost them to 8 cores
DeadEnferno 4 weeks ago
@MrM3MIX it has only 4 cores, and 4 threads, but it makes it look like you have 8 cores.
1BYEBYE1 1 week ago
@MrM3MIX you have 4 cores and 8 threatds
buzz9961 3 days ago
I would fucking laugh if once he opened it he dropped it and bent the pins
TheGenesisfreak 1 month ago
@assassin26764 the 3960x is actually an 8 core with 2 locked cores
axeaxe46 1 month ago
PEOPLE just because the bulldozer is faster and has more cores dousnt mean that it performs better! You want to know why Intels perform better? Well its because they have a kick ass chipset.
assassin26764 1 month ago
@assassin26764 The bulldozer's architecture is inefficient, that's why. The chipset has something to do with it, sure. But the reason why the Bulldozer is slow? - because the CPU is just slow. Well...when compared to others, at least.
HippehMac 1 month ago
*drops*
MrGoeiegozer 1 month ago
is that the infamous little hole in the heat spreader that i hated from the pga 478 days?
psychoclown420 1 month ago
im not going to upgrade my i7 950 till something like the i9 2800k comes out :/
CrASYmUZIk 1 month ago
Luckily we have some cheaper LGA 2011 CPU's coming in February. Can't wait to get my hands on one.
thomaspvh 1 month ago 27
@thomaspvh really? link to info?
envyus83 3 weeks ago
@thomaspvh Cheaper than the 3820? That would be interesting, however the board themselves are still pretty expensive...
Useful for video editors though, with quad channel memory.
christoiMc 2 weeks ago
@thomaspvh but they're not as good
1BYEBYE1 1 week ago
@1BYEBYE1 That goes without saying.
thomaspvh 1 week ago
Way overprived .. It may be the best .. but the price is just too expensive ..
LAZrailkapinda 1 month ago
How many FPS On Minecraft?
Hehehe.
BTW, Strongest Proccesor ever.
swordpalme 1 month ago
@swordpalme i tested it with a gtx 590 i was getting 140fps. haha
1BYEBYE1 1 month ago
@1BYEBYE1 Cool with a GTX 590 you can get way more.
In Video options set to Max FPS, Render Distance set it to Normal.
Oh and by the way if you have a Java 32 bit uinstall it and install Java 64 Bit.
Now go test your FPS okey?
swordpalme 1 month ago
Comment removed
1BYEBYE1 1 month ago
@swordpalme um i did all that except rendering distance on far, cause who wants anything less, do you think i'm a retard? also i set everthing to make max fps and rendering distance to tiny and got 300 fps.
1BYEBYE1 1 month ago
@1BYEBYE1 KK
swordpalme 1 month ago
i am from Russia
TheMOTERBOARDS 1 month ago
@TheMOTERBOARDS lol so?
buzz9961 1 month ago
Went on dick ashole. fuck you moterfuker!!@buzz9961
TheMOTERBOARDS 4 weeks ago
@TheMOTERBOARDS go jump of a bridge noob
buzz9961 4 weeks ago 12
@buzz9961 How exactly does one jump of a bridge?
KindaSlimShady 3 days ago
@TheMOTERBOARDS U Mad Bro
xODxSuperMonkeyP00 3 weeks ago
@TheMOTERBOARDS first go in a fridge to cool off. then we talk
guitarherofreak161 2 weeks ago
I've always wondered what gaming would be like with a 3960X, even though it would be total overkill. Getting 100+ fps in BF3 would be a sight to see lol.
NeoOsiris19 1 month ago
the stock coller 5 bucks:D
MrKaisyj 1 month ago
No free heatsink? No thanks.
ZenkoAce 1 month ago
@ZenkoAce why you use intel heatsink? lol
buzz9961 1 month ago
1:19 How did you not cut yourself 0_0
Ibankik 1 month ago
Why are you shouting!?
importedmusic 1 month ago
Alien processor...
MegaMegawar 1 month ago
You are funny ! :D
trsayurs 1 month ago
Ok guys, I personally prefer AMD over Intel because AMD's processors are usually MUCH cheaper! (equvilent of fx4100 cost £100 more). I have the FX4100 which is pretty good value for money since i was on a buget and it's doing great! Remember...AMD has the world record for 'The Worlds Fastest Processor' (FX8100 @ 8.429GHz) :D
MM168NSX 1 month ago
@MM168NSX Yeah, when 3/4 core nodes had been disabled. Not really the same, is it?
HippehMac 1 month ago
@HippehMac I suppose..
MM168NSX 1 month ago
no, you no need to say more?
TheKKkMotherFucker 1 month ago
AMD ONLY MAKES LOWER-PRICED PROCESSORS, BUT NOT BETTER ONES!!!
Vladdy95THS 1 month ago
@Vladdy95THS THANK YOU VERY MUCH, I LOVE YOU, THATS WHAT AMD IS, ITS SUCKS!
TheKKkMotherFucker 1 month ago
@ionizdgrunt2 oh noooooooo................ it does take $20 to make physical part of processor, bu where is mind labor? when do computer hardware engineers get paid? i guess that the were in school for 6 years and spent bunch of money on it so some idiot as you can come and say that they don't need to get paid.
THIS IS ONLY UPPER MID-RANGE PROCESSOR
Total cost = $250,000 / Engineer-Man/Year x 100 engineers x 4 years = $100,000,000 USD.
Vladdy95THS 1 month ago
@Vladdy95THS ok????? i never even said that they dont need to get paid? read carefully lol, and computer hardware engineers get paid good money lol, up to 120k/year where i live. And gaming wise intel and amd processors really dont make a difference, mostly ALL of the games ever made were only made to use 2 processor cores...... i just choose AMD because you get better price/performance, i just THINK that INTEL is way overpriced.
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
Im guessing... that intel is quickly putting these 3960x and the 3930k out there for some extra money before they put out the new ivy-bridge with the 3D transistors :D
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
nerd :D
buzz9961 1 month ago
Intel haters gonna hate..
dq9677 1 month ago
heres my breakdown from intel - amd
1. if your a gamer intel is a good choice.
2. if your a 3d animator that need ALOT of processing power, go AMD.
3. if your running MULTIPLE virtual server, go AMD
4. If your a budget builder go AMD
5. If your rich and lazy as hell, go intel, cause its more expensive :P
6. I choose AMD because of performance/cores
AND some benchmarks the 8150 beats the 2600k and ion MOST AVG GAMES! THERES HARDLY NO DIFFERENCE IN FPS FROM 2600k to 8150.
take that in mind.
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
ALSO this isnt worth $1000 bucks??!!!?! i mean seriously does anyone know how much it takes to make this processor.... less than about $20 bucks..... not worth it especially when the 2600k beats it STILL in some benchmarks, and ive heard it sometimes isnt as good as a 2600k. if you an overclocker dont get this, get the fx-8150 ive seen people get it to 5.5Ghz xDDDD and this probably cant hit 5.0Ghz Stable.... so what do you think? $1000 vs. $270? i would choose amd any day over STUPID INTEL!
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
@ionizdgrunt2 Lol.. maybe the actual materials they used cost 20 bucks, but did you ever see a fab? That shit is expensive.
MrPandawesome 1 month ago
@MrPandawesome yeah, i guess i didnt check that over, a fab is probably very expensive on run costs, and electricity costs, and man hours of course :P
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
BUT ITS NOT!! intel has an INDUSTRIAL 80 CORE processor! :D
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
@ionizdgrunt2 never again. they did NEVER made a 80 core. and if that were true, AMD already made a 200 core CPU.
totallykaos 1 month ago
@totallykaos umm yeah? there is ive seen it lol, its about 1ft radius :P its HUGE! lol
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
@Jakeoffline Nope :D
wasdpwns 1 month ago
linus can you see on the size how much better it performs than the 990x? for who want's to check: 3:00
totallykaos 1 month ago
buy a fx 8150, 2 more cores (8 cores!) higher standard clockspeed and less than a quarter of the price of this processor :D
AMD for life bitches!
totallykaos 1 month ago
@totallykaos Or a 2500k, which wipes the floor of the faildozer.
HippehMac 1 month ago 22
@HippehMac euhum, never seen cooking with intel?
intel asks way too much for their products.
i didn't said intel is bad.
i said that, when you buy AMD processor you get MORE for less than a quarter of a intel CPU
totallykaos 1 month ago
@totallykaos Just because you get more components that make up the processor, doesn't mean the processor is better. You're saying that because the FX 8150 has two more cores and a higher clock it's better than the i7 3960X...
Take the 2500k, a four core processor running at 300mhz less than the FX 8150 at around the same price - it wipes the floor with the bulldozer.
I'm no Intel fan boy - I want market competition to start up again...but i'll buy whatever product's the best...and it's not AMD.
HippehMac 1 month ago
@HippehMac overall performance of AMD processor's is better than intel.
i want to say that when you buy a AMD CPU for likeee 100 bucks and you buy an intel CPU for 100 bucks, AMD totally destroy's intel in that way.
that's what i wanted to say with: intel is too expensive for what you get!
totallykaos 1 month ago
@totallykaos lol noob
airwolf100 1 month ago
@HippehMac i respectfully disagree. yeah the bulldozer was not what the hype made it out to be but realistically who really need that much power. the average user isn't going to know the difference in what they are using if they took "the pepsi challenge". do you believe what you hear on here or do you look at actual benches?
blueovalfan23 1 month ago
@blueovalfan23 The average user doesn't need much more than a Pentium II...if you look at the actual bench results, then the 2500k still wins in most scenarios. The point is, the Bulldozer is AMD's flagship - nothing tops it. Whereas, the 2500k is, and there's no denying it, an amazing processor, but there are options which still top it. Meh.
Let's agree to disagree, shall we? Or this discussion could go on for far, far too long.
HippehMac 1 month ago
@HippehMac i would like to see those bench tests because a fast google search is saying otherwise. plus the passmark scores says just the opposite. look it up, they're above i5s and below the i7s but give them a run. i'm not say the bd is a sandy bridge killer, i'm saying people are dumping on this chip because it isn't and realistically, the difference, most aren't going to notice. most of these people are intel or nvidia fanboys i think. i doubt you are either. anyway i agree to disagree lol
blueovalfan23 1 month ago
@HippehMac I nearly taken the 2500k. Well, the 2500 is already super-fast.
somainglove 1 month ago
@somainglove If you want your PC to be good at gaming, then the 2500k is an amazing choice. If you want to do stuff like video rendering etc. then the 2600k is probably a better bet. I would still recommend getting the unlocked 'K' versions as it's so easy to get extra bang for your buck with the fool proof overclocking.
Hope you make a good choice!
HippehMac 1 month ago
@totallykaos get out.
iPhonemod702 1 month ago
@totallykaos
lol, when benchmarked against the i7's they lost. an absolute dead release.
SilasT01 1 month ago
@SilasT01 ben jij silas uit nederland *tweakers.net* ?
totallykaos 1 month ago
Comment removed
MrIwesseli 1 month ago
@MrIwesseli more cores equal better server performance, if your running multiple virtual servers, then the amd 12 core would be perfect for it.
ionizdgrunt2 1 month ago
@MrIwesseli it rules the overall speed of your computer. it's maybe the most important thing to get speed on your computer!
totallykaos 1 month ago
@totallykaos LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLOLOL
eddiesnipez 1 month ago
@totallykaos amd fx sucks the 1100t better then the fx 8150
buzz9961 1 month ago
@totallykaos You fail at hardware knowledge.
tjpld 1 month ago
Why in hell would you buy this for gaming?There are i5 and even i3 that will handle any game no problem.
tukarak 1 month ago
@tukarak arma 2
MsSloppyseconds 1 month ago
@MsSloppyseconds Your point is?
tukarak 1 month ago
SO!!!! MOTHER!!!! FUCKING!!!! EXPENSIVE!!!!
Snipe4Life9001 1 month ago
@1:43 come on man steal it......what a shame =)
JenishKapadia 1 month ago
lol i searched for the intel pentimum extreme edition
TheDougtechcrew 1 month ago
YEAH YEAH YEAH !!!
1,149.22 $.
Oh, ok I,I,I go to the bed.
DjuLaPantoufle38 1 month ago
this processor can run on game aslo overclock 3.30ghz to 4.2ghz! speed per 2 sec or so
TheMadeira2010 1 month ago
1:43 Take it and RUN, cameraman!!!!!
MrError303 1 month ago
am i the onlyone who watches endless videos of processors and highend graphics cards even though i cant afford them haha
Jakeoffline 1 month ago
the price of this CPU makes my peepee hurt
Regis1997 1 month ago 31
why pay 100USD When most Six Core cpu would be enuff ?
antonyr123 1 month ago
The price of that core is 990 USA DOLAR .. Its pretty expensive for the core .. However the core have 6 physical cores that can be using for the ultimate desktop gamer.. The Core can reach until 3.9 Ghz MAX turbo.. The core is the second generation from sandy bridge thats are known as SANDY BRIDGE EXTREME PROCESSOR
AzimSobri 1 month ago
As mentioned below, I agree this is overkill for gaming how ever, its like buying a car with 500 hp,you don't need it, but you want it, and find ways to justify it. I've already been thinking of reason to justify for a another PC build of mine.
aky19832001 2 months ago