Read the latest copy of Motorsport . The 4 smaller front wheels gave increased cornering grip & greater braking ability. Because the 10" front tyres were a one-off, Goodyear didn't bother developing them, if they had, it's thought that by the end of 77' they could have been worth a second a lap !.
This car wasn't any better nor worse because of the 6 wheels, just like the March 240. It was just more expensive to maintain, not to mention the pain to find the special font tires. 3 great drivers drove this car, only 1 win. Beautiful, no doubt, but not efficient in any way.
I think the P34 looks sexy as hell. The Ferraris were stuck up, skinny super models, the P34 was the girl next door with hips and an ass that could stop a train.
a simple and genius concept, six wheels much more surface contact at the front end and a much smaller frontal area. put look at that oversteer in that thing! it looks like a rally car screeching around the track at monaco. has anyone ever seen the 4x4 cosworth formula 1 car?
Imagine a six wheeler in today's racing?I don't think the pit crew or driver would settle for it if it means wasting another second or two to put on 2 extra wheels. what a dumbass concept
It was actually a brilliant concept and it had an increased grip level and cleaner aerodynamic model when compared to other cars. As for that extra second, they can just hire more pit crew. There's no limit to as much a team can have or not have, according to the rules and regulations. The only reason they stopped using this car was because that Goodyear couldn't manufacture the 10" tyres quickly and effectively for the team.
@creatyve The aerodynamics of the car wasn't any better then conventional models, the huge rear tires just about negated any advantage the smaller front wheels gave. It did however make the steering much more responsive, because they could set the turning angle individually for each wheel...
@skynet091287 yeah it greatly improved the mechanical grip. but when it came to high speeds where aerodynamics come into play, it did just become another car.
@creatyve Old comment, I know. The drivers agreed this car wasn't better nor worse in terms of grip compared to conventional cars. It is so true that it only won 1 race (with Jody Scheckter), even the great Peterson raced it. The March 240 had 4 rear wheels, and they realized the same thing: it wasn't any better nor worse. Just more expensive. I take it just as the most controversial and beautiful of all F1 cars. But nothing else.
Read the latest copy of Motorsport . The 4 smaller front wheels gave increased cornering grip & greater braking ability. Because the 10" front tyres were a one-off, Goodyear didn't bother developing them, if they had, it's thought that by the end of 77' they could have been worth a second a lap !.
adrenachrome05 1 year ago
This car wasn't any better nor worse because of the 6 wheels, just like the March 240. It was just more expensive to maintain, not to mention the pain to find the special font tires. 3 great drivers drove this car, only 1 win. Beautiful, no doubt, but not efficient in any way.
saulocpp 1 year ago
That looks insanely fast!
SthlmHenrik 1 year ago
Comment removed
leo1fun 1 year ago
Comment removed
goerge4 2 years ago
Seems fast, but also very difficult to drive!
fbcgon 2 years ago
I think the P34 looks sexy as hell. The Ferraris were stuck up, skinny super models, the P34 was the girl next door with hips and an ass that could stop a train.
fearbeforefearbefore 2 years ago
yeah!!!!!! bring back 6-wheelers
055697 2 years ago
Great video, car looks like a real handful, very few cars with downforce would have that much oversteer in high speed corners.
Vid really shows the speed of the car also.
vansoth 2 years ago
Love the thumbs up to the crew at the beginning of the lap.
fearbeforefearbefore 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
great engine sound :)
MrFranzose 2 years ago
what a piece of furniture.........
intrepidvs 2 years ago
how there wasn't no seat? I mean, the driver didn't have anything on his back.
F1fanTK 2 years ago
Look here: 0:59
F1fanTK 2 years ago
that was the main framework of the car with the plastic acessory removed for testing. the drivers were very poorly protected from the waist up.
T1carus 2 years ago
and I've just been a perfect example!!!!
christschinwon 2 years ago
It occurs to me. If one set out to build the fastest car allowed by the laws of physics, wouldn't you go with snow caterpillars, but with no tread?
RussellsParadox 2 years ago
Not quite. The rolling resitance would be far too great. It's smart to utilize ground effect. Aerodynamics ftw :)
spyxter 2 years ago
One of the most fantastical and controversial car of all the history of the F1.
Sorry for my poor english.. I´m from Argentina.
Greatings for all!!!
magnificent Era.
Markos681 2 years ago 5
you're kindding me. That's better than how a lot of English write on youtube!
christschinwon 2 years ago
it's cool the car,are not always like this car very rare tyrrel six wheels very good video
thebullformula1 2 years ago
Incredible, have you got any more of this film clip?
ZetanCrisp 2 years ago
a simple and genius concept, six wheels much more surface contact at the front end and a much smaller frontal area. put look at that oversteer in that thing! it looks like a rally car screeching around the track at monaco. has anyone ever seen the 4x4 cosworth formula 1 car?
davida41200 2 years ago
i just saw a 6-wheeler race at Monterey historics last weekend. The guy was fast & won the race.
racerxf12004 3 years ago
one of the best cars ever! for me the best car was the ferrari 312T8 (ferrari 8-wheels)
showtimethemusic 3 years ago 2
that car never actually existed mate, Ferrari put out the hype about it to keep people guessing about what they were doing.
l228spn 3 years ago
Imagine a six wheeler in today's racing?I don't think the pit crew or driver would settle for it if it means wasting another second or two to put on 2 extra wheels. what a dumbass concept
metubeony0utube 3 years ago
It was actually a brilliant concept and it had an increased grip level and cleaner aerodynamic model when compared to other cars. As for that extra second, they can just hire more pit crew. There's no limit to as much a team can have or not have, according to the rules and regulations. The only reason they stopped using this car was because that Goodyear couldn't manufacture the 10" tyres quickly and effectively for the team.
creatyve 3 years ago 8
@creatyve Actually, since then they have been banned - F1 regulations stipulate a car must have no more and no less than four wheels.
Stitch216 1 year ago
@Stitch216 Yeah, i miss the good old days where there were less regulations and restrictions. more exciting
creatyve 1 year ago
@creatyve The aerodynamics of the car wasn't any better then conventional models, the huge rear tires just about negated any advantage the smaller front wheels gave. It did however make the steering much more responsive, because they could set the turning angle individually for each wheel...
skynet091287 1 year ago
@skynet091287 yeah it greatly improved the mechanical grip. but when it came to high speeds where aerodynamics come into play, it did just become another car.
creatyve 1 year ago
@creatyve Old comment, I know. The drivers agreed this car wasn't better nor worse in terms of grip compared to conventional cars. It is so true that it only won 1 race (with Jody Scheckter), even the great Peterson raced it. The March 240 had 4 rear wheels, and they realized the same thing: it wasn't any better nor worse. Just more expensive. I take it just as the most controversial and beautiful of all F1 cars. But nothing else.
saulocpp 10 months ago
Kyalami 1977.... RIP Tom Pryce :(
LarsHavelte 3 years ago
Still Funny The Six Wheel Concept.
VinnyLegends 4 years ago