Added: 3 years ago
From: merinodds01
Views: 1,308
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice guy's

  • Other than that very nice. F-22 is much more impressive as far as construction. Very durable and very easy build (1 hr). Very nice dual fan setup. Seems to have better electronics. I am flying with stock setup and spektrum full range. Lots of fun, very stable, flys heavy and short flight times. Very easy to land.

  • how does the sapac f-22 compare to the typhoon

  • Typhoon is lighter, floats much more. Easy build, manual sucks and no mention of cg. Placing stock battery in what seemed to be battery slot proved to be grossly nose heavy. Less durable than F-22. Recommend rudder mod. Stock setup has good power range when she isn't on fire. Beware of stock esc.

  • nose heavy....you said it....i launched mines bout a week ago and it was really slow on reactions. as i was making a u-turn (lol) it started diving down and i tried to pull it up on time but it was too late...all the electronics made (thank god) but the body was a total loss. so now im about to order the sapac f22. im so excited about it. i hope it will turn out better than the ef2k (although i soooo love th ef2k) hey can i use my ef2k battery as a spare?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more