Added: 4 years ago
From: XXXSDESDEXXX
Views: 93,923
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (381)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this stone is amazing...i didn't know that there was Ancient Greek to this stone too..!!!

  • this is awesome

    

  • It just excites me when I think that, in millions of years, our pets might have evolved so well, they would be able to communicate with us, do complex things like math, and so on. I just hope we don't destroy this planet alltogether with our ego

  • MACEDONIA

  • Rosetta stones work great for phenticaly written language, unfortunately it doesnt work for Chinese. There is no letter A or B, there are words no letters

  • carl Motherfucking Sagan. hes done it again <3

  • @sandeshgitte - There are larger slabs in Israel. Inca and Mayan civilisations are way out on the time table compared to Egyptian pyramid building. Just because humankind manifests similar building designs across the World, doesn't imply Aliens or Atlantis super men built them. Ever heard of Coral Castle? One man, one castle, one whole lot of coral. As far as I know, Sagan had no belief in Alien intervention upon our planet. It was the scale of the universe that ignited his interest.

  • I suggest cheap rosetta Stone at w ww. rosettastoneoutletnow .c om.

  • Buy cheap Rosetta Stone v3, $109.99 at W W W. rosettastoneoutletnow . C O M

  • If Sagan had a weakest link, it was his 'faith' in aliens. Sure, probability suggests that 'alien' life is possible, however, we haven't seen or recognised such phenomena. Following scientific principles, why should we believe in something that has not been seen or detected via any of our scientific instrumentation? Where does theory end and 'faith' begin?

  • @GazGuitarz , Sir/Ma'am , With all due respect , The evidence of alien life and technology can be recognized here on our planet , If you ever get a chance to travel to Peru or Mexico to see the Inca or Mayan Civilization then please take a moment to think , "How were they able to erect and lift 50 Tonne stone slabs from one mountain to another , using Simple tools?"

  • @sandeshgitte i hope ur not suggesting that because we dont know how they moved stone slabs about aliens did it.....

  • @TheOrionStar , I am saying that with the technology , imagination and creativity that exists today , how much more evidence do we need to come to a conclusion. Why cant we accept some facts and move forward , If we are wrong we will know along the path. But we need mainstream scientists to support the "out of the box thinkers" and help each other. I know a lot of mechanical and Civil engg from respected universities who fail to explain to me how this can be achieved without outside help.

  • @sandeshgitte

    That is an argument from ignorance. Just because you are unable to explain someting doesnt mean you get to inject something else.

    Science doesnt know everything, that is why it doesnt stop. As for the South American forms that you are speaking of, we understand them. It is just a few vocal people selling books and videos that the knowledge isn't common place.

  • @GazGuitarz

    He had no faith in aliens. He accepted the possibility that they could exist, that acceptance is the result of testing and actual science.

    Faith is an acceptance/belief with no evidence. On many occasions Dr Sagan clarified that he had no faith in science or aliens..rather he accepted possibilities to one degree or another based on what can be seen and tested. That is the opposite of faith.

  • rosetta stoned

  • @AlwaysDisagreeing

    Ouch! You're being programmed to think what your cable companys' masters want you to think!

  • @AlwaysDisagreeing

    If you say so I guess it must be true...

    Just to be clear though, you are saying that building a pyramid is just as easy as building a skyscraper?

  • @BoWeava

    We know exactly how the Pyramids were made. That the undertaking was massive doesnt change that. We have the quarries, we know how the ramp systems worked, we know how they moved the stones.

    The methodology is not unknown. Any counter assertion is based on ignorance of the real facts.

  • @ThieleM

    "We know exactly how the Pyramids were made."  Really? "We" do? If you say so...

  • @BoWeava

    I don't say so, but egyptians have for generations and ACTUAL Egyptologists have also known how they were made. Just because you pick bad sources doesn't mean the real answers aren't out there.

  • @ThieleM dude dont wanna be a prick but thy have a theory just like the evolution theory the have a good idea but thy cant now for sure

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders

    You aren't being a prick, you are being completely ignorant of what a scientific theory is.

    A scientific theory isn't a hunch or guess that they can't know for sure. Scientific theories are explanation of a set of tested, verified facts and laws.

    I suppose you could not want to be an ignorant prick but that is completely different from being a prick presenting something that you understand.

  • @ThieleM so why do thy stil call the evolution theory a theory and not simply the evolution of mankind

    science is simply there most pluasible answer wich can shift and chance once new edvidnce is presented

    if the evolution theory was altered lets say the missing link is found then but in the mean time its still geus work in white jackets

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders

    I already answered that but since you can't seem to grasp it I will spell it out. In certain contexts a word may have a different meaning than in standard usage. LIke I said, in science a Theory is an explanation of tested and verified facts.

    You also shifted ground from talking about one thing (the theory of Evolution) to science. Perhaps you should get one thing clear before running off to another.

    There is no such thing as a missing link. You are ignorant.

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders

    Your first line is so stupid I can barely keep my jaw in place. Evolution applies to ALL LIFE not just humans. I am going to steal that and post it on the forums at PZ Meyers site.....you are about to enter the wall of shame.

    There is no missing link, that term has been perverted by people who have no clue (like you) there can be no missing link per se', rather we have a long unbroken chain of small changes. There is no half monkey half human creature out there.

  • @ThieleMi use the theory point as an example(and yes stupid mistake there give me a break its 9 in the moring havent sleped in 2days) but nevermind i see your a douche and btw there is a missing link if there is a gaint hole in the line of evolution that thy havent found so far........... and once agian idiot if there is no dispute why cal it a theory let me geus becuase like i said most plausible not a stated fact other wise thy cal it the evolution facts or wathever

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders

    You don't get a break, if you want to post you get slammed for your ignorance

    If you think there is a giant hole then you need to do some research, there are dozens of thousands of transitional forms. Becoming a fossil is very very rare so the holes that you speak of are expected and understood. The evolutionary record is stunningly lucid and obvious to people that understand how to study it. Toss in Molecular evidence and we are clear in our understanding.

  • @ThieleM and btw are you blind i dropped another post correcting the science thing to evolution .... any way fuck you if you cant understand what im trying to say Maby your not as smart as you claim to be if you cant understand a simpleton like me.... and btw go ahead like i give a shit if im on some shame wall im not gonna lose any sleep over it and btw nobody likes a prick that talks down on people happy karma

    btw you are as brainwashed as any religiuos fanatic

  • @ThieleM correction lolscience is there most.....evolution i mean.

    and no im not trying to deny evolution im just making a piont

  • @ThieleM Theory is an explanation of tested and verified facts.....so the most plausible thing according the the facts thy now of.......for a smart person you dotn really seem to understand what science is just look at the kwantum fysiks stuff before the "proved" it was al just some lie to cooked up by a crazy man....

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders

    The 'kwantum fysiks' stuff???? really! you are a moron. Quantum Physics is, at this time is more of a speculative science very different from Evolution...which is observed, tested and verified as real.

    Once again you have demonstrated that you don't understand how science works....its not just facts one knows of it has to include explanations of fact sets then draw them together into a unified framework of fact and explanation.

  • @ThieleM dude you have to be so creul about my spelling ouch

    wel i think you about said it all dumb discusion anway the way the word theory is viuewd

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders

    Its called grade 4 look into it

  • @ThieleM so funny took you for a prick turns out your a grammar/lecture troll

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders You're an idiot, please, get the fuck off my planet.

  • @ultimateownage2 troll fu ck off

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders Go to a fucking science classroom and learn what a theory is, what a fact is, what a hypothesis is, and what a law is. Then come back and try to debate on the internet.

    PROTIP: They do not mean what you think they mean, and right now, you look like a fucking idiot.

  • @ultimateownage2 and you dont looking up into the convo and thentrying to act all in the knowing og home ya dumd trol im sure you know even less qbout it then me stupid cunt

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders Get the fuck out of here. You had/have no clue what a theory, law, fact, and hypothesis are, and now you're embarrased. You're trying to use ad hominem to get out of admitted that you're wrong. I might not be all knowing, but I sure know alot more than you.

  • @ultimateownage2 dude how can it be an ad hominem you stated to attack me so reffering back to you is the only thing i can do but he we cant al pretenshis cunts

    and your stil a troll and btw i never denied im wrong i just have my viuews wich are oncinventinal yes but at least i know how i come to these vieuws no go back to your cave douche

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders The difference between me and you is that I don't base my arguments around attacks. You do. Well, the fact that I can spell things correctly is another difference.

    Also, are you seriously admitting that your views are wrong, yet you're saying it does not matter because I'm a douch? Finally, challenging your beliefs is not being a troll, but I see you have no rebuttals, so you need to yell "TROLL!" to get out of looking stupid.

  • @ultimateownage2half this things are written before i go to bed and when i am exhausted i don't take time to double check my spelling and 2 stop using a dictionary to try and look smart use normal words you only look like a pretentious prick nothing more and btw if your that smart come and talk to me in my own launguge well see how much spelling mistakes il find then

  • @ultimateownage2 btw its actualy my policy not to interact with trols so byby troll the other guy i was debating with at least had valid points even if i disagree on the fact that al theorys are fact and unchangeble wile i think most theorys in the science stuff are totaly submisve to change but any way see ya troll

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders By the way, your definition of a theory is wrong, I recommend you go back to ~5th grade to learn the correct definition, at least in a scientific context.

  • @ultimateownage2 i thought i told you i dont talk to trolls? btw do you always parrot the other guy when you troll into a conversation sad sad boy if your gonna troll do it right

  • @debbaOfTheFlanders Who is "the other guy"? You're what is wrong with the world. Even when it is proven that you are wrong, you call the other persona troll and you think that you won. Please, present an argument against our evidence or get out of here.

  • @ultimateownage2 lol dude1 the other guy is thieleM thats who you are parroting 2 did i call him troll no you because you are thee was nothing lefet to add but stil you butt in and troll me gg

    and also what evidence and what argument your starting to slip up there troll man

  • 8:43 That looks awfully a lot like an eye

  • The second text is translated by a professor from my university in Macedonia.

  • @SWIFTerMKD yea greek macedonian univercities have good rumors for that

  • @AlwaysDisagreeing

    No food for you.

  • @AlwaysDisagreeing

    If it wasn't for your obvious troll name, I might have actually responded.

  • whats that shadow in the back left at 5:40..

  • @Humbledish

    I think it was just the shadow of a bird.

  • @Humbledish A shadow of a bird probably.

  • a blind fool who leads other blind fools to their own condemnation!

  • I believe, Carl Sagan is still alive in the form of Michio Kaku.

  • @zapxlib michio kaku and carl sagan lived simultaneously, therefore that's impossible

  • "we must understand science" most people are to close to sports mlb,nfl,nba etc etc. and tv shows and very far from science, very nice video.

  • very enjoyable thank you for sharing.

  • P'tach? There is a klingon Curse word.. P'tagh... coincidence...?

  • @Valvallaria yep

  • "You get better results if you don't look at it too much" this is the advice my mother has always given me, as a matter of fact. It's always worked too - "sleep on it" is another way of putting it, if you're having a bit of trouble with a problem. You'll probably have an epiphany, and if you don't (and you know everything there is to know about the problem), then you should seek help in solving it, because you probably won't solve it by yourself.

  • Archaeologists have already countless times told the meaning of these things.. you guys just werent listening then..

  • Almost scary to think that we could be alone in the universe. I hope we're not. :)

  • Man, it's awesome.

  • 7:05 Ahh...the epic music starts. My brain linked that music with the epicness of the universe and Carl Sagan.

  • Watch the entire Cosmos series, it's all up on youtube as well and it's the best thing ever made.

  • who the hell dares dislike a video of Carl Sagan

  • @debnadaviebna sorry meant to hit like

  • @debnadaviebna People who dislike.

  • @debnadaviebna people (for lack of a lesser term) who wish to remain ignorant.....

  • The identical laws of nature, which would essentially be fractals correct? Obviously there's more complex elements and components, but everything has a blueprint or pattern so to speak. Everything is comprised of numbers.

  • The Rosetta Stone basically talks about restoring the tax privileges which the temple priests had in the past.-the impact of taxes in the course of a civilazation- pay attention people and governments, taxes can make or break us.

  • No one does it like Sagan!

  • Theres something about this guy that when he starts speaking i cant stop listening haha. There's something hipnotic about his voice :)

  • I'm not quite sure whi I admire most...The genius who makes such discoveries or the genius who spends his time explaining them to us morons.

  • @MrAudiovideodisco , Yes. :))

  • @MrAudiovideodisco Spend a couple minutes watching this guy and you're no longer a moron! haha.

  • @arterialshadow you have disco in your name an think yer sane????

  • @thoostorm4 Ahaha, I think you responded to the wrong person xD!

  • @MrAudiovideodisco Carl Sagan did both, an extraordinary man.

  • Believe in me believing in you Aniki!

  • If Egyptian wasn't deciphered until circa 1799 A.D., all of those books on freemasonry, about freemasons preserving ancient Egyptian secrets reduces to an absurdity. Moreover, if the Egyptian culture was circa 300 B.C. to 65 B.C., that renders the notion of the Egyptian culture dating to 4000 B.C. quite a stretch.

  • sweet more shit to trip me out when im ripped thinkin bout the universe and such............

  • @tlebo89 this isnt just "shit to trip out on when ur ripped".....

  • @dubtechnic just being the key word

  • @dubtechnic yeah it is cock.. weed or none im very intrested in this sort of "shit" and when im "ripped" it makes it a lot more intresting.. cock

  • @tlebo89 lol i love smoking weed too but it dosent seem like you form a proper opinion when your just "trippin on shit". "cock"

  • crying at 8 40 the music is great makes me cry thinknig about life

  • I squinted at 8:12

  • This man is a marvel, I am too young to have ever heard about him before I stumbled upon him. In my personal opinion, this should be on television, people should want to listen to this kind of thing.

    I plan on getting his books and watching as much as I can of him.

  • 2:15 to 2:20 "R.I.P HEADPHONES" =.(

  • to @ChriosM, sory my friend bt Discovery is worse than MTV for showing Bubblegum for the brain. And its like getting blood from a stone trying to gt something Scientific from D.Science. How can Ice Road Truckers, Heli Loggers and Deadliest Catch be science? How stuff works only shows you Automated machines doing the work, And when D.science does show something, they show "Universe" which was made around1998. maybe nt in the US,but it sucks major balls. I un-subscribed bcoz of them misinformants

  • 1:50 greek .thats why im proud of my ppl.the ancient greek im greek too for long generations.

  • i wish teenagers these days were interested in this... but they rather watch disney crap and such...

  • @ConfirmedManiacs

    I'm 16 years old, and find science and astronomy INFINITELY interesting. don't make blanket statements like that.

  • @TheLonelyWarrior1 i didnt say EVERYONE

  • I spy some Vangelis in the background :D

  • i love science

  • great guy... thanks for everything.

  • In the Quran it is mentioned that there are two worlds and that GOD is the lord of both worlds. It is often waived as meaning the living and the dead!! But I think that it is a mistake in meaning!! Somehow I think it indicates that God created another creature made of different waves that our eyes do not see!!! They are outside of our visible spectrum and audio spectrum!!

  • @salyha1 although i usually frown upon religious statements on videos, i like yours. open minded speculation toward religion is so refreshing to hear

  • check out ancient sumerian culture their gods and goddesses and the tale of the beggining is in the book of genesis...

  • Carl Sagan's mannerisms are so funny at times, why is he pulling up his sleeves like that lol, I know it's for better contrast against the stone but the way he just sits there fiddling with them is funny as, like an Ob/Gyn before going in.

  • @Sadochrist He does appear to be in the desert, it's possible he was fairly hot and uncomfortable in what he was wearing.

  • 7:47 there is a face on the bottom right hand corner of earth!!!

  • @AtheistAnarchoRudi AND THAT FACE IS LOOKING, WAITING, ASKING TO BE IGNORE BY THE HUMAN SCIENCE. IT TAKES UNIVERSAL STATE OF MIND TO UNDERSTAND AND BE IN HARMONY WITH MOTHER EARTH

  • absolutely wow!!!great persperstive ive learned today!!!!!he gave a reason to love science

  • I wish there were things like this on tv nowadays, and more importantly that people and in particular children, would look forward to it like so many looked forward to Carl Sagan's show.

  • @ChriosM

    There are things like this on today. Check out the Discovery Channel and the Science Channel. The problem is, back when this was on TV, there was like 13 channels from which to choose. Now there are hundreds. Add to that the media blasting crap like "Jersey Shore" and "American Idol" in our faces trying to convince us that it's important, and it's no wonder kids are growing up with no interest in science....

  • @mtszabo i myself was falling into this over 10 years ago... so glad i "woke up" but still find myself trapped in this nightmare. Glad to see someone else with advanced thoughts.

  • @mtszabo just think off who has real control over what you're watching then you begin to understand that those who govern want you to be just smart enough to work the machine and dumb enough not to ask questions.

    Just remember that while they blind the masses with crap they are scheming to turn us all into obedient and mindless slaves who are happy to be so....because nothing's more profitable than free labor

  • @alex666493

    True. I'm left wondering what will happen when the debt banking system finally collapses.

  • @mtszabo when that colapses, you won't even have the ability to wonder because we will have eliminated most if not all life on earth either emidiatly like in a world war or by simply procreating too much and destroying our habitats

  • @mtszabo There is stuff like this, but no where near as interesting. This is pretty clearly presentation at its finest.

  • @NoahRobertMiller

    Yes, Carl Sagan did have a gift for making science interesting. Although, I do appreciate listening to Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson almost as much. He adds a lot more humor than Sagan, but is just as effective in communicating his point.

  • @mtszabo That's not necessarily true. There are many more opportunities for science to prosper in the minds of youth through TV than ever before. Although there are definitely more Jersey Shore fans than that of the Discovery Channel, I still find that kids today know more about science than their parents. Just look at technology! My parents are almost incapable of using a cellphone or the Ipad. Both are relatively simple, but they are indeed left behind in this new generation.

  • @ArtistryofDebauchery

    While I agree with you in that kids today are more tech-savvy, I still believe there is a general lack of interest in science. I mean, yes, both of my kids know how to use iPhones, iPads, iPods, computers in general... but they're at a complete loss when something goes wrong with any of the aforementioned devices. Case-in-point, my son started going to school for aviation, then quickly changed majors once he realized that there was a lot of math/science involved...

  • @mtszabo Well Im not so sure about your son, but I will say that science is much more popular than it was long ago. If we look back, science was heresy and we believed in a geocentric, flat world. But just relatively recently, schools are now explaining things that would have been very nebulous back then. But yes, there is a definite line between those who grow up appreciating science's wonders and those who would rather not. It's frightening, but intelligence will always triumph over ignorance.

  • @mtszabo

    nah discovery channels are big fat liars

  • @mtszabo i agree with all the new gaming systems kids dont go out and play or think for themselves in thier life of education. they want to be things that arent real when they grow up. are time has forgotten the old ways of meditation, religeon, sciences to explore the world, space, and time. to truly experience the world. or mabye the univers. in the near future.

  • @wolfmangml1 the worst decision I ever made in my life was getting addicted to video games...no wait I take that back, the worst decision I ever made was moving to L.A. There's science all around, yes, but when you go outside the sky is just tormented by smog. It's truly awful, and probably the reason I'd preferably not go outside.

  • @mtszabo The dumbing down of America. Stay tuned for "Idiocracy".

  • @mtszabo Unfortunately the Discovery Channel is becoming less like it was before. I mean lots of the shows aren't even remotely close to science. Ah well...

  • @MIDNAq1LINK

    Yes... the dread "Quest for Ratings" I'm afraid... still, there's the Science Channel, which still had a tendency toward actual interesting science content....

  • @mtszabo In Sweden we only have 5-7 channels.

    Sadly not even the science and public service channels show things like this but UFO shows, psyschic investigations and such

  • @GoldenChantarelle

    Surely you're only counting the official Swedish stations? I mean, you do have access to Pan-Nordic and Pan-European stations, no?

  • @mtszabo maybe if you live in the big cities and if you pay extra for it, otherwise no

  • @GoldenChantarelle

    Well... hooray for the Internet then!

  • @mtszabo "Jersey Shore" is an embarrassment to all Citizens of the USA!!!

  • @n64wilbert

    ALL of EARTH.

  • @n64wilbert So are many many other people :P

  • @mtszabo

    Ancient Aliens on The History Channel is in it's 3rd season now too. The first season is the best in my opinion because they show a lot of proof backed by science.  The 2nd and 3rd seasons ask more questions that are currently backed by theories.

  • @BoWeava lol what are you talking about, all of those claims have no scientific evidence.

  • @OhmgrownCron

    So I guess you believe that ancient people built things we can't do today? Just because you can't prove how these things were done doesn't mean that you make up shit like "uhhhh man build it!" just so people like you say "uhhhh ok."

    The proof is that the science community has lied for years and we have no idea how all this shit was built. I'm sure you've probably never watched a whole episode so make a point instead of a caveman response.

  • @BoWeava LoL I don't have to prove anything..."The science community has lied for years." Name 1 claim they lied about, 1. The burden on proof is for the one making the claim (that aliens visited earth) Negative evidence is not sufficient, you need to have positive evidence as well. There is none, who ever does find it would win 1 million$ by the James Randi foundation, though.

  • @OhmgrownCron

    And they have positive evidence? Didn't think so.

  • @BoWeava

    Yes, I've see all of the episodes. Interesting, but difficult to prove. I remember seeing a TNG episode where primitive natives thought the Enterprise crew were Gods. That was an epiphany moment for me.

  • @mtszabo

    Yea but they didn't build enormous pyramids and temples that can't be recreated today. Another epiphany?

  • @BoWeava

    Well, I agree that it's doubtful that primitive Egyptians built the pyramids with brute force. But, "can't be recreated today?" That I'm not so sure of. I think it's a matter of "it wouldn't be worth the expense" rather than "it's impossible to do." Granted, 30-40 years ago, it was closer to "impossible to do." So, what does that leave? Either extraterrestrial involvement, or a sufficiently advanced human society that managed to war itself back into the stone age.

  • @mtszabo

    Ok maybe a bad choice of words. We could build them today but besides the expense, it would be a MASSIVE undertaking even with our conventional resouces.

  • @BoWeava

    Agreed.

  • @mtszabo

    As Bruce Springsteen put it "57 channels and nothing on"....

  • His voiiiiice isssss mmmmmquite incredibleeeeeee!....Carl is the real God!!!

  • see this website and the following page for the science behind the decoding of my following comment

    cropconnector website .... /2010/wilton/comments.html Whoever did this ... If we cannot now appreciate

    the great beauty of their high intelligence,

    and their yearnings to make contact with other advanced scientists

    or mathematicians on Earth (for whom it was clearly meant),

    then our local, often-struggling human race here will be the worse for it.

  • The primary ASCII code shown at Wilton Windmill crop circle 22nd May 2010 contained 96 binary digits, as 12 ASCII characters of 8 binary digits each. And it gave a close approximation to Euler’s Formula from advanced mathematics ( /watch?v=MqzNojwSPzE ) , Yet it also contained 9 anomalous binary digits. Those 9 anomalous digits equal 011010001 or 011-010-001 in octal base-eight meaning “3-2-1”. (a countdown to 2012) Another is the inclusion of an 'h' (physics?)

    THE EPS /watch?v=N6QMxgWCtls

  • Perhaps conscious, thinking beings such as humans are the universe's way of becoming self-aware.

  • so it was the ancient greeks then who 1st decifered hieroglyphics? otherwise the french scientist would not have been able 2 figure it out if it wasnt 4 the greek translation that right?

  • why did carl sagan have to leave so early ;__;

  • @thedeathskittle He was too smart, so the universe called him back in.

  • How utterly convenient that the Rosetta stone held the same inscriptions in three languages!

  • @suddenlyitsobvious Well its not strange TBH.

    Those nations all traded, was relatively close to eachother.

    And that town "Rosetta" must have been a major trade route between the north and the south, if you want to bring the news to several diffrent people you must write in many diffrent languages.

    Much like the worlds museums often describes its obejct in the native tounge, english, french, spanish and german.

    They simply wanted everyone to know about that great man.

  • @ 4:28 Carl totally farted look @ his face he leans over to smell it lmao

  • the diffferent images you see of the sphinxs are real and the ones with no nose was doen by an africna army as they did not want to let people who know who or what race ruled at that time period so that they can say egypt was ruled only by blacks.

    The truth of the matter really was that Egypt was rulled by many different races throut the years of its existance. Some rulers were black and some asian and some who looked anglo/white.

  • I have respect for a man/woman with a Phd in Astrophysics,I had enough troubles getting a Bach in Pharmacy. That caused enough hair pulling!

  • This is so sensually seductive to my brain.

  • Man, that is some ferocious codebreaking :-)

  • Now you see why we let the Brits do much of the codebreaking in WWII....that is some ferocious codebreaking! :-)

  • Rule #1: Don't assume to know anything. Even solidity is an illusion. All tests have unimaginably com,plex outside factors and nullifiers. Just enjoy a trip to Macdonalds, or saturday night TV while your brain decays in a sense false peace. If your lucky, you may get get luckier once in a while (joke).

  • This obviously inspired him to write Contact!

  • what baffles my mind is when people fall pregnant - the thought of that zygote dividing itself, sucking in more atoms to create a conscious being.

  • A great scientist talking for great matters! He puts all the pieces of knowledge, we had so far, together! Great!

  • sagan is punk rock!!

  • @goog2k...not Christ ...Krishna ....and all our Human "deities " died for us first ..but the Stars !...as we are of them

  • did mankind understa nd the world in the past:they don.t the high-teck we have in the 21 cent.

  • if man was divided in the world (past) who did it.we have super pc &we are bio-speech- planet : many we shoud learn from star terk-univ. trasletor.

  • if man was divided in the world (past) who did it.we have super pc &we are bio-speech- planet  : many we shoud learn from star terk-univ. trasletor.?