Use a long fine hypodermic syringe filled with a dyed liquid which is not miscible with the corn syrup and which has the same density (so that the droplets won't rise or fall). The needle is carefully held vertically on the midplane between the Couette cylinders, and a droplet squeezed out, the needle tip is moved and another droplet formed and so on to spell out letters or whatever. Stan Mason may have developed this demonstration. Does anyone have documented citations before 1957?
I first saw this demonstration in 1957 performed by Dr. Stan Mason of McGill University, only with the far more dramatic effect of having words spelled out with droplets of the dyed mineral oil suspended in the corn syrup - they smear, then reconstitute. The apparatus is called a Couette viscometer. Mason studied interactions between particles in shearing fluid - they behave rigid rules. The effect seen here depends on having a high-viscosity Newtonian fluid (corn syrup) and a low shear rate.
@jacquesdebauche3 that's an interesting idea having words spelled out! Do you have any information or know where I can learn more about his demonstration?
This is extremely nifty. I wonder how many turns you can make before undoing the cranks doesn't effectively unmix the liquids. It's always nice to see the universe giving you back something for free.
It's funny how they don't even explain it. They just say "wow" and "cool" and the demonstrator just says the technical terms without defining them :/ This is why I don't plan on getting cable when I leave my parents
It's actually NOT true that this has never been on TV before. This exact same type of demonstration was used on a Discovery Channel(or maybe it was TLC) show about wave/particle theory. That said, I always love seeing this experiment.
It depends on your definition of mix. What happens is that as you spin the cylinder, it drags thin sheets of fluid around in a circle over and over again. Since the fluid is so viscous, these sheets don't "melt" into one mass very quickly, so you can return them to a smiliar state from when you started. If you're having trouble visualizing the sheets metaphor, thing about rolling up a piece of paper.
@tinghaling it's just a demonstration of fluid dynamics or more specifically laminar flow. The unmixing of dyes don't have any modern day significance but the concept behind it, masses of particles moving in the same direction, has applications in fields like aerodynamics and boat design.
@FinnishFuturist I think it might have a little bit to do with forced conversation and trying to awkwardly fit some jokes into a demonstration that doesn't need them.
@jzzsxm If Re>1 and the flow was turbulent, the mixing of the fluid would be irreversible as the dye would entrain the cornsyrup in a "random process". Here it just spreads out in a thin ribbon which can be wound back up..
@jzzsxm laminar means non-turbulent. If it is turbulent, then it is chaotic, and extremely unlikely to go back to its original state. the lack of turbulence means that the only forces being applied to the inks are around the cylinder due to the rotation, and they are not mixed in a chaotic way.
I think it's pretty relevant. The relatively low Reynolds number combined with the high viscosity keep the flow laminar along the sheet boundaries. That's what makes the process highly reversible. The high viscosity prevents the boundaries from breaking down in a short time scale, and the reynolds number means that its relatively easy to just apply an opposite torque and have everything move back into place.
i saw this on the science channel trivia question thing with carrie from mythbusters
MyFladoodles 3 days ago
How many times can it work???
CrazyMustache37 1 month ago
Lol "Reynold's number is under 1". Reynolds number need to be under ~2300 to have laminar flow.
amirali23 1 month ago
What kind of black magic are they using here?
OJulioIsidro 4 months ago
@OJulioIsidro european
DasBasdoInc 1 month ago
I was guess look like a magic trick of science like this??? That's amazing.
ZENESTASCNE954321801 5 months ago in playlist SCIENCE ACTIVES
@jonaslover9971 Yeah, but in subtractive system. This is additive.
endimion17 7 months ago
I saw this demonstration performed with glycerin. It was much clearer and the dots were stacked one on top of the other for a more dramatic effect.
TheAllBlackMan 7 months ago
@FinnishFuturist -- wow, one mention of the US flag and you're all flustered.
Him, Brainwashed? Maybe.
You, Moronic? Absolutely.
How did I know that from one comment? You somehow did.
goolgaul 8 months ago
Yay, a shout out to UNM and Prof. Cahill! I never took a class he taught unfortunately.
PennyDorkis 9 months ago
what can i use instead of corn syrup? ANSWER, pls
707ruby 10 months ago
very low Reynold number, the time derivative component might drop out in the NS equation, making things time reversible
kevinfang2007 10 months ago
would anything other than corn syrup work? maybe a saturated sugar solution?
misternobodyunoe 10 months ago
Use a long fine hypodermic syringe filled with a dyed liquid which is not miscible with the corn syrup and which has the same density (so that the droplets won't rise or fall). The needle is carefully held vertically on the midplane between the Couette cylinders, and a droplet squeezed out, the needle tip is moved and another droplet formed and so on to spell out letters or whatever. Stan Mason may have developed this demonstration. Does anyone have documented citations before 1957?
jacquesdebauche3 1 year ago
I first saw this demonstration in 1957 performed by Dr. Stan Mason of McGill University, only with the far more dramatic effect of having words spelled out with droplets of the dyed mineral oil suspended in the corn syrup - they smear, then reconstitute. The apparatus is called a Couette viscometer. Mason studied interactions between particles in shearing fluid - they behave rigid rules. The effect seen here depends on having a high-viscosity Newtonian fluid (corn syrup) and a low shear rate.
jacquesdebauche3 1 year ago 19
@jacquesdebauche3 that's an interesting idea having words spelled out! Do you have any information or know where I can learn more about his demonstration?
Stevespanglerscience 1 year ago 11
@Stevespanglerscience thats so legit
rockinconcorde2 9 months ago
@Stevespanglerscience could i buy this off your website?
rockinconcorde2 9 months ago
I hate the host.
Tecfan 1 year ago
Wow !
UNBELIEVABLE !
That is Hard to EXPLAIN !
Science want me to Brainstorm.... :)
themobstermentalist 1 year ago
science
freddyen 1 year ago
how many flags in the world aren't red white and blue? <,<
furuilulz 1 year ago
Hey Americans - that's called "science". Do you still have "science?"
gregshortall 1 year ago
never done before on tv? we did this in the ninth grade when we were studying viscous fluids
dorukanji2 1 year ago
Can you say Back to the Future 4?!
TylerFTW 1 year ago
Witch!
TheGracefulGhost 1 year ago 3
Magic, got it.
shoegazer666 1 year ago
Better call Saul
RandominatorTube 1 year ago
Isn't it really really pretty?
wulyfs 1 year ago
This is extremely nifty. I wonder how many turns you can make before undoing the cranks doesn't effectively unmix the liquids. It's always nice to see the universe giving you back something for free.
jobriath85 1 year ago
The science guy seems to be kinda throwing fluid mechanics terms around.
chase42106 1 year ago
it didn't work though
Dorkdufus 1 year ago
my model airplane leverages the same concept. Low reynolds number, low speeds, modest angle of incidence.
baloneyjazz 1 year ago
WITCHCRAFT!
solidkingcobra 1 year ago
They just run the video backwards in the second half.
sean10222 1 year ago
It's funny how they don't even explain it. They just say "wow" and "cool" and the demonstrator just says the technical terms without defining them :/ This is why I don't plan on getting cable when I leave my parents
Blacklemon67 1 year ago
It's actually NOT true that this has never been on TV before. This exact same type of demonstration was used on a Discovery Channel(or maybe it was TLC) show about wave/particle theory. That said, I always love seeing this experiment.
ehrichweiss 1 year ago
omg time travel!
rcropper 1 year ago 4
i'd like to see what it looks like from above. i don't think the colors really mix.
jolte 1 year ago 29
@jolte
It depends on your definition of mix. What happens is that as you spin the cylinder, it drags thin sheets of fluid around in a circle over and over again. Since the fluid is so viscous, these sheets don't "melt" into one mass very quickly, so you can return them to a smiliar state from when you started. If you're having trouble visualizing the sheets metaphor, thing about rolling up a piece of paper.
ChrisMills90 1 year ago
Time Travel.... we're close..
Anyways, this is really cool, to be able to travel back in time with a simple equipment, thats nice
bone009 1 year ago
What use has this t modern day life?
tinghaling 1 year ago
@tinghaling - Is something's "Use" the only measure of its value? I am sure that Tesla had no idea what "Use" electricity was going to be..
soffitboy 1 year ago
@tinghaling it's just a demonstration of fluid dynamics or more specifically laminar flow. The unmixing of dyes don't have any modern day significance but the concept behind it, masses of particles moving in the same direction, has applications in fields like aerodynamics and boat design.
Blacklemon67 1 year ago
i dont get how this is cool....
tonylahh 1 year ago
it has been done on tv before liars daily planet did it first :(
pelky16 1 year ago 3
Its never been on tv and i dont need that to see :DDD hahahahahaha
monstero111 1 year ago
God did it.
werehyenataur 1 year ago
So you see red and blue and immediately think of the US flag!? There's a difference between patriotism and just being plain brainwashed.
FinnishFuturist 1 year ago 140
@FinnishFuturist red blue and green...prime colors genius... not a flag
caffiendkitten 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist I think it might have a little bit to do with forced conversation and trying to awkwardly fit some jokes into a demonstration that doesn't need them.
galatix27 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist
He's obviously American. It's no brainer to think of your own country before others, such as France.
gnookergi 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist hes making conversation
Comblit 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist I usually think of the British flag but occasionally the French, Norwegian or Australian flags :)
naturalleoni 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist I think of the British Union Jack, even though I'm not from the UK. :D
baracuda771 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist Says someone with the username Finnish Futurist.
I agree, though
SamECircle 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist aren't we all brain washed by all politics?
DroPShoTShArPShOoTeR 1 year ago
@FinnishFuturist
there the primary colors!!!
zayah42806 1 year ago
its like a uranium cetrifuge
Grdankl 1 year ago
hahaha 1:29 TOTAL thats what she said!! hahhahaha
MyTt10 1 year ago
hydrodynamic at low reynolds numbers. kind of high-viscous liquid was applied.
Jaysonzheng 1 year ago
seen this before but good vids
boomboompow3000 2 years ago
"Reynolds number less than one"
"Laminar Flow"
I mean, those two MAY apply to this, but it's hardly relevant to the fact that it's reversible.
jzzsxm 2 years ago
@jzzsxm If Re>1 and the flow was turbulent, the mixing of the fluid would be irreversible as the dye would entrain the cornsyrup in a "random process". Here it just spreads out in a thin ribbon which can be wound back up..
dchristiaan 1 year ago
@jzzsxm laminar means non-turbulent. If it is turbulent, then it is chaotic, and extremely unlikely to go back to its original state. the lack of turbulence means that the only forces being applied to the inks are around the cylinder due to the rotation, and they are not mixed in a chaotic way.
rdmbox95 1 year ago
@jzzsxm
I think it's pretty relevant. The relatively low Reynolds number combined with the high viscosity keep the flow laminar along the sheet boundaries. That's what makes the process highly reversible. The high viscosity prevents the boundaries from breaking down in a short time scale, and the reynolds number means that its relatively easy to just apply an opposite torque and have everything move back into place.
ChrisMills90 1 year ago
@jzzsxm I just realized who you were. Oh my god.
ChrisMills90 1 year ago
Journalists are so stupid
jigglesnap 2 years ago 136
@jigglesnap I usually think of the British flag....but occasionally the French, Norwegian or Australian flags :)
naturalleoni 1 year ago
is only low reynolds number, reversibility condition...
diario292 2 years ago 2
u deserve hundreds of awards!or u deserve to be one of those guyz oin the guiness world of records
hermoineglitter 2 years ago
he does
Kirolies 2 years ago
He deserves so many more views... 8600?!?
Cmon...
keyser66guitarist 2 years ago
sick
redhawk781 2 years ago
that is awesome!
ThePotatoes 2 years ago
cool
cornchipper4cp 2 years ago