@LukeTheOne99 have you heard of a RFID xmark chip? i guess the bible is just a big coincidence then. and btw your the stupid one here who needs to wake up
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of Creation), before We clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" Holy Quran 21:30
All of the big bang occurred.Kuran,so deeply about the creation of the universe and the big bang theory that contains information describing a single book,so this theory before it is exhausted.
Those who disbelieve,cosmos (heaven),and the world (in) sewn to each other separate them from water every living thing,coordinated and created you do not see?Still, they do not then believe?
21-Surat al-Anbiya, 30
Und das Universum (Himmel) und haben Wir gestärkt. Sicherlich Erweiterung es.51 Dhariyat 47
luyben12... You mean kind of like how people re-write things in the bible all the time? If it's Gods word and it's so perfect, why change it so often? The only difference between biblical changes and scientific changes, is that information related to scientific theories is changed based on observation and is fueled by the need to try and perfect the theory.. Biblical changes are made to appease those in control of their followers, and those unhappy with the current morals of their religion.
@luyben12 You mean kind of like how people re-write things in the bible all the time? If it's Gods word and it's so perfect, why change it so often? The only difference between biblical changes and scientific changes, is that information related to scientific theories is changed based on observation and is fueled by the need to try and perfect the theory.. Biblical changes are made to appease those in control of their followers, and those unhappy with the current morals of their religion.
athiests believe life began on Earth with a big bang and their human DNA came from some primordial mud soup. in a way that would make them dumb as dirt.
@catwomanFL72 thats not what atheists believe at all. you have no clue what the big bang theory is, or how evolution works, this explanation is moronic , f*cking dumbass.
@truckertoby24 when our physical bodies die it returns to which it came from. dust. but we're much more than just physical beings. we're spiritual beings FIRST AND FOREMOST AND THE SPIRITUAL BEING LIVES FOREVER. do you need evidence of your spirit? just rub your feet on carpet and touch someone or something. you'll feel the static shock. that is energy. that energy is the evidence of your spirit. in short there is some truth to the 'dust' theory.
@catwomanFL72 Can you provide a demonstration as to how static electricity is indicative of a soul? As many often do when attempting to provide an argument in favor of a "soul", you've comitted the fallacy of equivocation.
@catwomanFL72 Yes, really. I'd expect that one should be able defend their positions, however, I suspect you are incapable of doing so considering the untenable nature of your beliefs. You can't expect anything less than objection if you advocate these positions nonetheless.
@jessiessica your last sentence didn't make sense but yes, Adam's flesh WAS created from dust and the flesh will return to dust. Adam was also a spirit and the spirit lives forever.
@catwomanFL72, it does make sense if you consider your original comment. And according to the logic of that comment, that would make them as dumb as dust, as opposed to as dumb as dirt.
@catwomanFL72 Exactly how did you come to the conclusion that atheists believe life began on Earth with a big bang? The two have nothing to do with each other, they're in utterly different scientific fields. No one believes that human DNA was the first DNA to form, much less that it arose from a "mud soup", and to say otherwise is mere sophistry of the most inane sort.
science discovered the fertilizer sustaining 40% of the earth's population...not to mention the medicine in hospitals that saves live everyday...technology & the advancement of our civilization & saving people is no joke.
you're reading this now because of science...you are a hypocrite for using their discoveries
i know the video is not factual but i feel the need to explain this to everyone after watching this.
1. in the begining,with the countdown to the big bang, this could not happen because time did not exist until the big bang effect, so you could not measure something that is not there.
2. the big bang was more of an expansion of mass and energy in a controlled pattern and distribution, rather than the "pop" of a firecracker.
3. at 2:25, the universe is apace, and could not exist within space because there is nothing outside of the universe.
4. you could not observe the big bang from outside the universe, because there is nothing outside the universe so you could not exist to witness it from the outside.
@jdmceo1 Yes, we are a coincidence. Dont you think if a 'god' created us, he would create more than just one planet full? I know I would show off creating shit all over the place if I could. Theres a vid about "galactic soup' where just the right ingredients came together to create us. Very lucky to be alive here. That's why theres no life anywhere else that weve found, we are an anomaly, an accident.
ok i will NEVER believe in jesus and that giant fucking fairy tale but i will always consider a higher power starting the universe with that one atom and it making it explode, and making the one living cell on earth so it alone can multiply and evolve.
wait, if The universe continually expands and has been expanding for many years.. than what is outside the universe?.. i mean wouldnt universal expansion possibly effect our planitary obit? maybe knocking us into the sun or maybe nudging us far away enough to freeze to death? maybe it will stop growing and will somewhat implode?
That's not necessarily true.. If it had any more mass than it has that would be true.. It's only regarded as having no mass because it can't be tested to determine of it really has absolute zero mass.. This is a common fact in physics.. So it's just regarded as no mass for sake of argument. If I could post links here I could show you what I am talking about.. ;)
In simple terms. Our universe was created by energy itself.. And all that transpired was the result of the physics nature of energy itself.. Energy self-osculated, gains mass. and creates it's own matter.. There is no "Creator".. Energy exists because the opposite is impossible.. Existence exists because Non-existence can't be a literal noun..(m,m,e)
@TheJackelantern For something to have mass, it must be made up of matter. If something is made up of matter, then it is made up of particles. If something is made up of particles, then it has density, if it has density, it cannot have 0 volume. D= M/V. If V=0, then your answer for density is 0. You forget that all physics is based off of mathematics. Until you show mathematical proof, your theory is invalid.
that's false.. physics is based off math yes, but zero represents lowest min. It does not mean you can have literal zero mass. And there is also no such thing as literal zero volume.. You can only have zero base volume..There is no such thing as 0 space.. If you collapse a sphere you can't collapse it into a negative spatial sphere. You can only reach absolute convergence.
@TheJackelantern The definition of a singularity is Massed contained in a point like area. Point like denotes 0 volume. Please get a degree, otherwise I have zero tolerance for people who think skimming wikipedia counts as learning.
Zero volume is under the wrong notion of infinite density, However, it fails to address how infinite density fails to be infinitely dense can gives way to infinite expansion. Quantum Physics suggest there is no infinite density or zero volume.. To have density you have to have volume of containment..
You must remember that just because you can apply a variable to an equation does not make it true.. It's like time travel..You can't break C or travel faster than light to break forward inertia..energy can't out run itself... So just because I can put an infinite number into the speed variable doesn't make it possible
@TheJackelantern But the definition of a singularity is mass contained in point like parameters. Point like denotes 0 volume. SO anything with volume is not a singularity, but something else.
@TheJackelantern Yes you can have 0 mass. Photons, gluons, and the theorized graviton all have 0 mass, and thus travel at c. The definition of a singularity is mass in a point like area, or parameters. If something else exists like a singularity, but with volume, then it is not really a singularity per se.
Photons are traditionally said to be massless. This is a figure of speech that physicists use to describe something about how a photon's particle-like properties are described by the language of special relativity. When the particle is at rest, its relativistic mass has a minimum value called the "rest mass" mrest.
It is almost certainly impossible to do any experiment that would establish the photon rest mass to be exactly zero. Hence given the hidden clue that some things that do not have mass on their own have mass because of their movement. This is true for light - a light photon is considered to have no mass, but its energy can act as mass when it hits something...Some of us call this zero base mass.. The higgs field however is something of interest in regards to this..
@TheJackelantern If the photon had mass, relativistic or otherwise, it would not be able to travel at the speed of light. This is a well known, provable fact.
look up Vaccum Energy, Zero Point energy, and Ground state..
Big bang did not come from "Nothing".. There never was such a literal thing.. -1 energy can not exist people, neither can -1 spatial dimension.. Big Bang is nothing more than the physics of energy itself that makes up the entirety of all existence..
This video is false.. The big bang for one was not an explosion, it was an expansion .. Secondly it didn't come from nothing,,Hence, the Universe is not the sum total of existence, it's a disc like that of our galaxy withing a larger expanse .. This kid obvious don't under stand physics or the fact that Existence is entirely comprised on energy.. The emergence of a singularity comes from zero base energy..
To put this in perspective.. Existence can't be created.. And -1 energy or -1 spatial dimension can not exist..Hence,. non-existence can not be a person, place, or thing.. Existence simply exists because non-existence can not exist. = -1 energy can't exist, -1 spatial dimension can't exist!
@TheJackelantern How can a singularity contain matter, and hence mass, when the density formula has mass divided by volume? If D= M/V and V = 0, then your answer would be undefined, and hence non existent for any value for mass except 0. Therefore, a singularity has no mass or takes up volume, which would make it something other than a singularity. Theres your scientific proof against singularities.
there is no such thing as zero mass, there is only zero base mass to which energy itself represents.. We may never understand the physics of a singularity completely, but it could not exist without energy, and thus could not exist without mass.. -1 mass. -1 energy, or -1 spatial dimension are not possible.. There is also a theory floating about that concerns the central behavior of a singularity.. something similar to the casimir effect..
0 energy in your equation only represents zero base energy.. It's not literally zero energy. So a singularity would have to have mass and take up volume. We may not understand the exact physics of the singularity, but the Big Bang most Definitely occurred.. The only way to verify is to recreate the big bang itself..
also mass does not mean it's matter. I think people forget that matter is entirely comprised of energy.. it's the same idea of water vs Ice metaphorically and literally.. the only thing remains is the semantics of how dense energy can be at a single focal point until it can no longer contain itself and results in expansion.. At some point a limit is reached to the containment and breaks.
I wanna know how the little dot was created but nobody is explaining it! I'm getting pissed. I just want an explaination supported by factual evidence.
@fosheimdet There is no evidence that god didn't make the universe, and god making the universe does make sense, UNTIL there is a specific evidence that proves against this.
@SaveTheEmos The big bang theory, and many scientific facts are written in the Quran. I'm a Muslim because we have a single holy book we call the Quran, and this holy book doesn't have a single scientific error in it. Unlike some other religions such as christianity, that have thousands of different versions of bibles which are full of errors that go against science.
@SaveTheEmos If god isnt real.. than who is? who is the creator? why did the big bang explode? what made the big bang explode? what created the thing that made the big bang explode? what created the thing that made the thing that made the big bang explode? And what created that? and that and this and so on!? its all confusing how this began. so once again. if god isnt real, than who is?
@Midonir1 dude i hate idiots like u. u always have the same the same argument about god. "blah blah blah blah who created us blah blah god is the ruler of all.." BULLSHIT!!!! religion has been in question for hundreds of years while science has prooven itself time and time again, who should i believ?
@Midonir1 Riddle me this: If God made the universe, he would have to be more complex than the universe. Now, God must have created himself. Now out of the two - God and the less complex universe - which is more likely to create itself from nothing?
@ExplosiveDragon Are you another atheaist or whatever those people who dont belive in god? There has to be a creator or superior over us humans and animals, im not saying who created what really but im asking a few youtubers what their opinion is on how all this big bang stuff started and why it exploded and so on really..
@ExplosiveDragon I would have to say The universe possibly created a god and that individual from there created " Life ". Therefore the universe is more likely to create itself from nothing.
@ExplosiveDragon I would have to say The universe possibly created a god and that individual from there created Life . Therefore the universe is more likely to create itself from nothing.
So you mean to tell me that all existence, all intelligant life was all coincidence? That this huge explosion billions of years ago created life as we know it today. Im not calling you stupid at all but you have to be ignorant to not believe in a higher power, JESUS.
@aguteempasil Sorry, but would you please show me which part of this theory isn't a fairytale? I'm just saying that because @jdmceo1 here stated his belief and no one should pick on anyone's belief.
@dheeluthubgt no one except almost all religious groups in the world...? know what the word persecution means? that pretty much sums up the abrahamic religions. and also this video is a very poor representation of what actual might have occured. you wanna know what the big bang actually is, read a science book written by a scientist. e.g. stephen hawking, or steven strauss. religion deserves all the crap that it gets.
@aguteempasil Ahh, no need to, I already read and learned so much about the big bang theory, thank you. (: I'm not a big fan of most of the religious nuts in the world either -- they act in the name of religion and God, but they turn to be the walking hypocrite of themselves. I'm a science nerd myself -- but I also am a Christian. I just don't believe in the big bang, and yeah well, that's my belief over there. With all the difference, we should appreciate each other beliefs.
@dheeluthubgt The problem is that the big bang is not a belief, it's a scientific theory, like evolution or gravity. It's like you don't believe in gravity or evolution.
The problem is that you think that some of the theories are not compatible with your beliefs. If that's your reason, you are wrong. You can't believe first, and then watch the proofs of the "other side".
@jdmceo1 im ignorant for believeing some person made a guy out of some fucking dirt which was magically made and then then some girl was made by one of that guys rib? go fuck yourself
you want to be all godly, well i am washed in the blood of jesus christ and i think the big bang theory goes along great with the bible, a light from the beging, is it not written that God is OUR LIGHT? and God made an expantion of the heavens and the earth from a great black dence thing
when Jesus Christ was on earth he did things for a leason right without saying the actual meaning, and that is one person's opinion on GOD, don't let that effect you, and just to let ya know mat.5:36 do not swear..
u said "In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth" r u saying that be4 earth god wasnt there at all? what your saying is all fucked up and confusing. nobody believs your shit so jus drop dead man and do us all a favor
Many people question 'if God created the universe then who created God?'
Rephrase it from a different point of view 'if a little dot created the universe then what created the little dot?'
Something not tangible i.e a greater power, something supernatural, not of our physical world - God is not of our physical existence. Something for you to ponder, not to choose.
@JaySoKnown, if you want people to respect your beliefs, you need to learn to respect theirs first.
@Bradleyley1337 oooooh you made a great point there. If the big bang created the universe, then what created the big bang? And what created the thing that created the big bang? And what created the thing that created the thing that created the big bang? Etc....
Aw... are the big nasty scientists using words you don't understand.... I think you'll find that the current theory makes perfect logical sense. Research and study would tell you that, but actually understanding something before you blindly bash it is beyond you, isn't it?
@burninmunkeys Isn't it interesting how the Quran is full of scientific facts that were just recently discovered? Facts that were already in our holy book which is centuries old. Isn't it interesting how a poor illiterate person from a village first obtained this book? The Quran itself is a proof of God. There is nothing in the Quran that isn't compatible with what science taught us in the recent years, even this big bang theory is in it.
I like this video for the simple fact that it makes you ask questions about existance, religion and science. And you got 304 comments about a couple of dots... and everyone commenting about expansion not explosion, lol.... If they would just read a couple comments before trying to correct your project. This video is not a waste of time...!!! :)
As soon as I read "no, its not the least bit factual" I knew it would be incredibly stupid to attack you over it. Would you attack Matt Groening over the Simpsons because people aren't yellow? At the same time though, I knew heaps of people would attack you over it. I wish people would read descriptions.
lol it was funny 2 me
princess17257 4 days ago
Do religous people still have faith in there fiction book? Who ever came up with god has made a lot of stupid people
LukeTheOne99 1 month ago
@LukeTheOne99 have you heard of a RFID xmark chip? i guess the bible is just a big coincidence then. and btw your the stupid one here who needs to wake up
GIV3HUGS 1 week ago
@GIV3HUGS very nice fiction book isn't it?
LukeTheOne99 1 week ago
@LukeTheOne99 its ok your just depressed
GIV3HUGS 1 week ago
@LukeTheOne99 Not sure what a 'religous' means. Please try again.
ledzkreep 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of Creation), before We clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" Holy Quran 21:30
malitrueblue1 1 month ago
sounds Like Jedward haha
Th3L4d 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the King James Bible before the hubble telescope on: Job 26:7 He Stretches Out The North Over Empty Space;He Hangs The Earth On Nothing.
clos1499 3 months ago
why does the red dot sound like the green dot
FunnyButBadFunny 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of the big bang occurred.Kuran,so deeply about the creation of the universe and the big bang theory that contains information describing a single book,so this theory before it is exhausted.
Those who disbelieve,cosmos (heaven),and the world (in) sewn to each other separate them from water every living thing,coordinated and created you do not see?Still, they do not then believe?
21-Surat al-Anbiya, 30
Und das Universum (Himmel) und haben Wir gestärkt. Sicherlich Erweiterung es.51 Dhariyat 47
SuperGeniusLife 3 months ago
Dear Green Dot,
I don't understand you-.-
I don't think you really have magic powers because if you did, THIS VIDEO WOULD BE A LOT BETTER!
AND DON'T CALL ME A DUMB KID!
georgiaa998 4 months ago
Comment removed
georgiaa998 4 months ago
Just delete this, it sucked so bad!
Belicke100 6 months ago
It's not explosion it's expansion. DUMB ASS! Haha.
SolonDolly 7 months ago
This should be Big Bang theory from a Dummy!!Thumbs Up!
triniweezy1 7 months ago
its not that bad if you were very young this would be a great way for them to understand it :D
animelover3331 7 months ago
yeah thats rite when nothing makes sense just take the lazy way out and say a god did it. stupid motherfuckers
dillinger9999 7 months ago
I don't even believe in this. Nothin' against athhiests but the big bang doesn't make sense towards my religion. You can't just appear here!!
therashidarahman 8 months ago
Btw, I thought it was an 'EXPANSION' not an EXPLOSION..ppfftt! Not that it exists anyway, since it is just a theory.
therashidarahman 8 months ago
Btw, I thought it was an 'EXPANSION' not an EXPLOSION..ppfftt!
therashidarahman 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
luyben12... You mean kind of like how people re-write things in the bible all the time? If it's Gods word and it's so perfect, why change it so often? The only difference between biblical changes and scientific changes, is that information related to scientific theories is changed based on observation and is fueled by the need to try and perfect the theory.. Biblical changes are made to appease those in control of their followers, and those unhappy with the current morals of their religion.
EvilCatsss 8 months ago
@luyben12 You mean kind of like how people re-write things in the bible all the time? If it's Gods word and it's so perfect, why change it so often? The only difference between biblical changes and scientific changes, is that information related to scientific theories is changed based on observation and is fueled by the need to try and perfect the theory.. Biblical changes are made to appease those in control of their followers, and those unhappy with the current morals of their religion.
EvilCatsss 8 months ago
The big bang theory was made up by dummies.
mrtadreamer 8 months ago
Lol... I feel like a college student now. You're in 8th grade when this was made? WTF I'M NOT THAT DUMB >>"
1UpMmushroom 8 months ago
nice video especially that you made it when you were in 8th grade!! =D
yhelps 9 months ago
Paradox 5.
Why does the Universe work by well defined processes that we study in science classes?
How did Big Bang give birth to these processes?
dorianmyrer21 9 months ago
Paradox 3.
All of the experiments scientists did show energy converts into an equal amount of matter and antimatter when it passes through dense objects.
Why don't we have stars made of antimatter in the Universe?
Paradox 4.
How did particles of matter that Big Bang created manage to form atoms since the Big Bang expansion gave them a very great speed?
dorianmyrer21 9 months ago
Unknown about the Big Bang
Paradox 1.
What type of energy was the Big Bang singularity made of?
We have many types of energy in the Universe.
Paradox 2.
If all of the energy of the Big Bang singularity converted into matter, then why is there still energy in the Universe?
dorianmyrer21 9 months ago
@injesuschristwelive
few to no creations of an 8th grader ever make sense, I'm just too lazy to take it off youtube.
haquearsh1 9 months ago
What song is this?
AMT2315 9 months ago
@AMT2315
it has miriwais - disco science
racounteurs - level
audioslave - like a stone
and idr the rest
haquearsh1 9 months ago
@luyben12 yes my friend...thank you and God bless.
catwomanFL72 10 months ago
athiests believe life began on Earth with a big bang and their human DNA came from some primordial mud soup. in a way that would make them dumb as dirt.
catwomanFL72 10 months ago
@catwomanFL72
Atheists don't believe in a God... it has nothing specifically to do with the Big Bang, evolution, or DNA.
Not that I side towards either, just thought I'd clarify.
haquearsh1 10 months ago
@haquearsh1 i think you need to look up the word 'clarify'.
catwomanFL72 1 month ago
@catwomanFL72
Atheists don't believe in a god (hence A-theist), and does not imply any beliefs towards evolution, genetic mutation, physics or the Big Bang...
Not saying that I favour either, I just thought I'd clarify.
haquearsh1 10 months ago 3
@catwomanFL72 thats not what atheists believe at all. you have no clue what the big bang theory is, or how evolution works, this explanation is moronic , f*cking dumbass.
theUKatheist 7 months ago
@catwomanFL72 Bible says god made man from dirt.
Theists are dumb as dirt.
GerrohTheCommie 6 months ago
@catwomanFL72 And people who believe in God think that people were made out of mud? whats the more appropriate 1?
lloyde32 3 months ago
@lloyde32 thats a big misconception but you're free to believe whatever you want. goodbye.
catwomanFL72 3 months ago
@catwomanFL72 according to christians man was made of dirt and women from his rib... catwoman.. not much better.
truckertoby24 3 months ago
@truckertoby24 when our physical bodies die it returns to which it came from. dust. but we're much more than just physical beings. we're spiritual beings FIRST AND FOREMOST AND THE SPIRITUAL BEING LIVES FOREVER. do you need evidence of your spirit? just rub your feet on carpet and touch someone or something. you'll feel the static shock. that is energy. that energy is the evidence of your spirit. in short there is some truth to the 'dust' theory.
catwomanFL72 3 months ago
@catwomanFL72 Can you provide a demonstration as to how static electricity is indicative of a soul? As many often do when attempting to provide an argument in favor of a "soul", you've comitted the fallacy of equivocation.
bizzyb1999 1 month ago
@bizzyb1999 REALLY?
catwomanFL72 1 month ago
@catwomanFL72 Yes, really. I'd expect that one should be able defend their positions, however, I suspect you are incapable of doing so considering the untenable nature of your beliefs. You can't expect anything less than objection if you advocate these positions nonetheless.
bizzyb1999 1 month ago
@catwomanFL72
correct term is evolutionist, and yes, a piece of rock is smarter than them, lolz
elfy99803 3 months ago
@elfy99803 okay.
catwomanFL72 3 months ago
@catwomanFL72
That is not even close to being true, so get your facts right.
hippypancake 2 months ago
@hippypancake REALLY?!!
catwomanFL72 1 month ago
@catwomanFL72 and Christians, Jews, and Muslims believe Adam was created from dust. So what does that make them as dumb as?
jessiessica 1 month ago
@jessiessica your last sentence didn't make sense but yes, Adam's flesh WAS created from dust and the flesh will return to dust. Adam was also a spirit and the spirit lives forever.
God bless
catwomanFL72 1 month ago
@catwomanFL72, it does make sense if you consider your original comment. And according to the logic of that comment, that would make them as dumb as dust, as opposed to as dumb as dirt.
jessiessica 1 month ago
@jessiessica are you serious? well i guess the title of this video is self-explanatory, the big bang theory is for dummies.
catwomanFL72 1 month ago
@catwomanFL72 Exactly how did you come to the conclusion that atheists believe life began on Earth with a big bang? The two have nothing to do with each other, they're in utterly different scientific fields. No one believes that human DNA was the first DNA to form, much less that it arose from a "mud soup", and to say otherwise is mere sophistry of the most inane sort.
bizzyb1999 1 month ago
@catwomanFL72
some atheists believe that aliens merged or dna and made us
MrJovan104 1 week ago
@luyben12 Are you out of your mind?
MetalliCxZero 10 months ago
The big bang is not a damn explotion!
Jeez..
mikstar890 10 months ago
@luyben12
science discovered the fertilizer sustaining 40% of the earth's population...not to mention the medicine in hospitals that saves live everyday...technology & the advancement of our civilization & saving people is no joke.
you're reading this now because of science...you are a hypocrite for using their discoveries
who's the retard now? ...you are the joke
Abgef 1 year ago
@luyben12
of course they change the theory...because they're always discovering new things about the universe.
it wouldn't make sense to just stop & just be content with what we know now.
Abgef 1 year ago
i know the video is not factual but i feel the need to explain this to everyone after watching this.
1. in the begining,with the countdown to the big bang, this could not happen because time did not exist until the big bang effect, so you could not measure something that is not there.
2. the big bang was more of an expansion of mass and energy in a controlled pattern and distribution, rather than the "pop" of a firecracker.
44GamerNerd55 1 year ago
3. at 2:25, the universe is apace, and could not exist within space because there is nothing outside of the universe.
4. you could not observe the big bang from outside the universe, because there is nothing outside the universe so you could not exist to witness it from the outside.
5.
44GamerNerd55 1 year ago
Bitch nigggaa
Marwantheballer 1 year ago
@jdmceo1 Yes, we are a coincidence. Dont you think if a 'god' created us, he would create more than just one planet full? I know I would show off creating shit all over the place if I could. Theres a vid about "galactic soup' where just the right ingredients came together to create us. Very lucky to be alive here. That's why theres no life anywhere else that weve found, we are an anomaly, an accident.
MegaSixstring 1 year ago
ok i will NEVER believe in jesus and that giant fucking fairy tale but i will always consider a higher power starting the universe with that one atom and it making it explode, and making the one living cell on earth so it alone can multiply and evolve.
ShitBallsBanana 1 year ago
google Doe's Account.
firefloat22 1 year ago
it wasn't an explosion. expansion, and only expansion. nothing blew up.
Icies1020 1 year ago
"the universe lies in space"
..?
jimRRRRRRRRRR 1 year ago
wait, if The universe continually expands and has been expanding for many years.. than what is outside the universe?.. i mean wouldnt universal expansion possibly effect our planitary obit? maybe knocking us into the sun or maybe nudging us far away enough to freeze to death? maybe it will stop growing and will somewhat implode?
Midonir1 1 year ago
a little green dot
SuperUniverse555 1 year ago
That's not necessarily true.. If it had any more mass than it has that would be true.. It's only regarded as having no mass because it can't be tested to determine of it really has absolute zero mass.. This is a common fact in physics.. So it's just regarded as no mass for sake of argument. If I could post links here I could show you what I am talking about.. ;)
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
ご・・・五芒星・・・さ・・・三角関係は惑星もかよｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗえーっくす！
deejaypyonpyon 1 year ago
@deejaypyonpyon chinese?
daberko120ch 1 year ago
@daberko120ch japnese
deejaypyonpyon 1 year ago
In simple terms. Our universe was created by energy itself.. And all that transpired was the result of the physics nature of energy itself.. Energy self-osculated, gains mass. and creates it's own matter.. There is no "Creator".. Energy exists because the opposite is impossible.. Existence exists because Non-existence can't be a literal noun..(m,m,e)
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern For something to have mass, it must be made up of matter. If something is made up of matter, then it is made up of particles. If something is made up of particles, then it has density, if it has density, it cannot have 0 volume. D= M/V. If V=0, then your answer for density is 0. You forget that all physics is based off of mathematics. Until you show mathematical proof, your theory is invalid.
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
that's false.. physics is based off math yes, but zero represents lowest min. It does not mean you can have literal zero mass. And there is also no such thing as literal zero volume.. You can only have zero base volume..There is no such thing as 0 space.. If you collapse a sphere you can't collapse it into a negative spatial sphere. You can only reach absolute convergence.
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern The definition of a singularity is Massed contained in a point like area. Point like denotes 0 volume. Please get a degree, otherwise I have zero tolerance for people who think skimming wikipedia counts as learning.
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
Zero volume is under the wrong notion of infinite density, However, it fails to address how infinite density fails to be infinitely dense can gives way to infinite expansion. Quantum Physics suggest there is no infinite density or zero volume.. To have density you have to have volume of containment..
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
You must remember that just because you can apply a variable to an equation does not make it true.. It's like time travel..You can't break C or travel faster than light to break forward inertia..energy can't out run itself... So just because I can put an infinite number into the speed variable doesn't make it possible
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern But the definition of a singularity is mass contained in point like parameters. Point like denotes 0 volume. SO anything with volume is not a singularity, but something else.
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern Yes you can have 0 mass. Photons, gluons, and the theorized graviton all have 0 mass, and thus travel at c. The definition of a singularity is mass in a point like area, or parameters. If something else exists like a singularity, but with volume, then it is not really a singularity per se.
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
Photons are traditionally said to be massless. This is a figure of speech that physicists use to describe something about how a photon's particle-like properties are described by the language of special relativity. When the particle is at rest, its relativistic mass has a minimum value called the "rest mass" mrest.
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
It is almost certainly impossible to do any experiment that would establish the photon rest mass to be exactly zero. Hence given the hidden clue that some things that do not have mass on their own have mass because of their movement. This is true for light - a light photon is considered to have no mass, but its energy can act as mass when it hits something...Some of us call this zero base mass.. The higgs field however is something of interest in regards to this..
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern If the photon had mass, relativistic or otherwise, it would not be able to travel at the speed of light. This is a well known, provable fact.
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
look up Vaccum Energy, Zero Point energy, and Ground state..
Big bang did not come from "Nothing".. There never was such a literal thing.. -1 energy can not exist people, neither can -1 spatial dimension.. Big Bang is nothing more than the physics of energy itself that makes up the entirety of all existence..
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
This video is false.. The big bang for one was not an explosion, it was an expansion .. Secondly it didn't come from nothing,,Hence, the Universe is not the sum total of existence, it's a disc like that of our galaxy withing a larger expanse .. This kid obvious don't under stand physics or the fact that Existence is entirely comprised on energy.. The emergence of a singularity comes from zero base energy..
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern
To put this in perspective.. Existence can't be created.. And -1 energy or -1 spatial dimension can not exist..Hence,. non-existence can not be a person, place, or thing.. Existence simply exists because non-existence can not exist. = -1 energy can't exist, -1 spatial dimension can't exist!
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern 0 energy and 0 spatial dimension cannot exist, and 0 in terms of physics implies nothing.
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
@TheJackelantern How can a singularity contain matter, and hence mass, when the density formula has mass divided by volume? If D= M/V and V = 0, then your answer would be undefined, and hence non existent for any value for mass except 0. Therefore, a singularity has no mass or takes up volume, which would make it something other than a singularity. Theres your scientific proof against singularities.
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
there is no such thing as zero mass, there is only zero base mass to which energy itself represents.. We may never understand the physics of a singularity completely, but it could not exist without energy, and thus could not exist without mass.. -1 mass. -1 energy, or -1 spatial dimension are not possible.. There is also a theory floating about that concerns the central behavior of a singularity.. something similar to the casimir effect..
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
0 energy in your equation only represents zero base energy.. It's not literally zero energy. So a singularity would have to have mass and take up volume. We may not understand the exact physics of the singularity, but the Big Bang most Definitely occurred.. The only way to verify is to recreate the big bang itself..
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
also mass does not mean it's matter. I think people forget that matter is entirely comprised of energy.. it's the same idea of water vs Ice metaphorically and literally.. the only thing remains is the semantics of how dense energy can be at a single focal point until it can no longer contain itself and results in expansion.. At some point a limit is reached to the containment and breaks.
TheJackelantern 1 year ago
I wanna know how the little dot was created but nobody is explaining it! I'm getting pissed. I just want an explaination supported by factual evidence.
crimsonmonie 1 year ago
I'll throw a rock in a pond and watch it bloom into a universe....yar....physicists shall be humbled...
johnsmdm 1 year ago
what's the music at the biginning of the vid?
4KINGDD 1 year ago
Comment removed
JaySoKnown 2 years ago
i dont have anything aggainst ppl that beliv in god im jus saying that... GOD IS NOT REAL AND THE BIG BANG THEORY ACTUALLY MAKES SENCE!
SaveTheEmos 2 years ago 20
Totally agree. I mean, there is no evidence for that god made the universe, and it does not make sence, so why believe in it?
fosheimdet 1 year ago
@fosheimdet There is no evidence that god didn't make the universe, and god making the universe does make sense, UNTIL there is a specific evidence that proves against this.
fog0death 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos The big bang theory, and many scientific facts are written in the Quran. I'm a Muslim because we have a single holy book we call the Quran, and this holy book doesn't have a single scientific error in it. Unlike some other religions such as christianity, that have thousands of different versions of bibles which are full of errors that go against science.
fog0death 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos How can you know for certain that God doesn't exist? Maybe God created the big bang? Maybe science and religion are compatible?
Adrenalx42 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos If god isnt real.. than who is? who is the creator? why did the big bang explode? what made the big bang explode? what created the thing that made the big bang explode? what created the thing that made the thing that made the big bang explode? And what created that? and that and this and so on!? its all confusing how this began. so once again. if god isnt real, than who is?
Midonir1 1 year ago
@Midonir1 dude i hate idiots like u. u always have the same the same argument about god. "blah blah blah blah who created us blah blah god is the ruler of all.." BULLSHIT!!!! religion has been in question for hundreds of years while science has prooven itself time and time again, who should i believ?
SaveTheEmos 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos Your idiotic name explains it all, i suppose your emo and have no reason to believe in god?
Midonir1 1 year ago 2
@Midonir1 Riddle me this: If God made the universe, he would have to be more complex than the universe. Now, God must have created himself. Now out of the two - God and the less complex universe - which is more likely to create itself from nothing?
ExplosiveDragon 1 year ago
@ExplosiveDragon Are you another atheaist or whatever those people who dont belive in god? There has to be a creator or superior over us humans and animals, im not saying who created what really but im asking a few youtubers what their opinion is on how all this big bang stuff started and why it exploded and so on really..
Midonir1 1 year ago
@ExplosiveDragon I would have to say The universe possibly created a god and that individual from there created " Life ". Therefore the universe is more likely to create itself from nothing.
Midonir1 1 year ago
@ExplosiveDragon I would have to say The universe possibly created a god and that individual from there created Life . Therefore the universe is more likely to create itself from nothing.
Midonir1 1 year ago
@Midonir1 you are asking questions that have no answer. u say WHO is real when there is no WHO there is only What. as in what happnd not who happnd
SaveTheEmos 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos the big bang theory does not make sense because it still does not tell us what caused the big bang only the remaficasions after.
ClapTrapNinjaAssasin 1 year ago
So you mean to tell me that all existence, all intelligant life was all coincidence? That this huge explosion billions of years ago created life as we know it today. Im not calling you stupid at all but you have to be ignorant to not believe in a higher power, JESUS.
jdmceo1 1 year ago
@jdmceo1 no, you have to be ignorant to believe in the higher power of jesus. its a fairytale.
aguteempasil 1 year ago
@aguteempasil Sorry, but would you please show me which part of this theory isn't a fairytale? I'm just saying that because @jdmceo1 here stated his belief and no one should pick on anyone's belief.
dheeluthubgt 1 year ago
@dheeluthubgt no one except almost all religious groups in the world...? know what the word persecution means? that pretty much sums up the abrahamic religions. and also this video is a very poor representation of what actual might have occured. you wanna know what the big bang actually is, read a science book written by a scientist. e.g. stephen hawking, or steven strauss. religion deserves all the crap that it gets.
aguteempasil 1 year ago
@aguteempasil Ahh, no need to, I already read and learned so much about the big bang theory, thank you. (: I'm not a big fan of most of the religious nuts in the world either -- they act in the name of religion and God, but they turn to be the walking hypocrite of themselves. I'm a science nerd myself -- but I also am a Christian. I just don't believe in the big bang, and yeah well, that's my belief over there. With all the difference, we should appreciate each other beliefs.
Just saying.
dheeluthubgt 1 year ago
@dheeluthubgt The problem is that the big bang is not a belief, it's a scientific theory, like evolution or gravity. It's like you don't believe in gravity or evolution.
The problem is that you think that some of the theories are not compatible with your beliefs. If that's your reason, you are wrong. You can't believe first, and then watch the proofs of the "other side".
wjavier316 1 year ago
@jdmceo1 im ignorant for believeing some person made a guy out of some fucking dirt which was magically made and then then some girl was made by one of that guys rib? go fuck yourself
ShitBallsBanana 1 year ago
@ShitBallsBanana bro chill out. very mature comment by the way.
jdmceo1 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos well its the only thing thats proven
paavya 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos
explain the cause of the big bang? AND explain, where, how and into what the universe is displacing in its expansion.?
EGMAG 1 year ago
@SaveTheEmos yeah because a little object is really gonna explode into a universe O.o emos are so dum xD i thought they died out!
FRAMEDSKATEKREW69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2. Let´s take long chutes from different materials into the space and place
telescopes to them to observe some known place of a star. If the energy that
comes to the chutes makes the photons moving in the chute to bend towards
the chute, we can this way observe that this star concerned seems to be in a
different place than it is known to be!
Etimespace 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5. This way the time of the old photons is faster than the time of the new
photons and the photons radiating from the stars do not tranfer their
kinetic energy to the photons passing by the star as much as the photons
coming towards the star do. This way the light bends at the same time it
passes the star without supposedly the star would bend the space!
Etimespace 2 years ago
Comment removed
JaySoKnown 2 years ago
you want to be all godly, well i am washed in the blood of jesus christ and i think the big bang theory goes along great with the bible, a light from the beging, is it not written that God is OUR LIGHT? and God made an expantion of the heavens and the earth from a great black dence thing
frodo0bear 2 years ago
Comment removed
JaySoKnown 2 years ago
when Jesus Christ was on earth he did things for a leason right without saying the actual meaning, and that is one person's opinion on GOD, don't let that effect you, and just to let ya know mat.5:36 do not swear..
frodo0bear 2 years ago
Comment removed
JaySoKnown 2 years ago
u said "In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth" r u saying that be4 earth god wasnt there at all? what your saying is all fucked up and confusing. nobody believs your shit so jus drop dead man and do us all a favor
SaveTheEmos 2 years ago
Comment removed
JaySoKnown 2 years ago
dude read it more carefully...
SaveTheEmos 2 years ago
@SaveTheEmos
Put it this way -
Many people question 'if God created the universe then who created God?'
Rephrase it from a different point of view 'if a little dot created the universe then what created the little dot?'
Something not tangible i.e a greater power, something supernatural, not of our physical world - God is not of our physical existence. Something for you to ponder, not to choose.
@JaySoKnown, if you want people to respect your beliefs, you need to learn to respect theirs first.
Bradleyley1337 1 year ago
@Bradleyley1337 oooooh you made a great point there. If the big bang created the universe, then what created the big bang? And what created the thing that created the big bang? And what created the thing that created the thing that created the big bang? Etc....
fog0death 1 year ago
Aw... are the big nasty scientists using words you don't understand.... I think you'll find that the current theory makes perfect logical sense. Research and study would tell you that, but actually understanding something before you blindly bash it is beyond you, isn't it?
MaskOfSanity999 1 year ago
F***!!!&%$*W$^
I thought this video was about the tv series!
phoiv 2 years ago
what a fatal turn you made...
haquearsh1 2 years ago 21
evolution,
theory of relativity,
theory of quantum mechanics
are compatible with christianity and islam
pauman2121 2 years ago
because thats so relevant...
haquearsh1 2 years ago
@pauman2121 They're compatible, yes, with some alterations. Does that mean, that God is any more real? No.
burninmunkeys 1 year ago
@burninmunkeys Isn't it interesting how the Quran is full of scientific facts that were just recently discovered? Facts that were already in our holy book which is centuries old. Isn't it interesting how a poor illiterate person from a village first obtained this book? The Quran itself is a proof of God. There is nothing in the Quran that isn't compatible with what science taught us in the recent years, even this big bang theory is in it.
fog0death 1 year ago
@fog0death Okay, start naming off facts that are in there that we just recently discovered.
burninmunkeys 1 year ago
@pauman2121 christianity and islam are not compatible with common sense.
peterfaj 1 year ago
@pauman2121
no they arent
they are based on real world
UninstallingWindows 1 year ago
You should do porn you sound like a sex documentry commentator
PrecisionConnections 2 years ago 2
It wasnt an explosion, it was an expansion...
yellowmink 2 years ago
why did it start to spin?
what happened just before the explosion to cause it to explode, other than god saying let there be light
termite289 2 years ago
shut up
323053884 2 years ago
Title should be big bang theory for retards
hansdeep 2 years ago
Stephen Hawking should watch this; he might learn something.
zor98765 2 years ago
(POP) do we have to pop every time?
that was funny
chrismofer 2 years ago
The title of this video should be "A dummy explaining the Big Bang Theory."
daveboy55555 2 years ago 16
haha, that's actually quite witty
haquearsh1 2 years ago 8
lol, true but I give an "E" for effort.
couerl 2 years ago
Or it could also be "A dummy explanation of the Big Bang Theory." lol
daveboy55555 2 years ago
fail :)
FUTHX1138 2 years ago
Throw enough iron into the sun and it will collapse. Want to try it?
AcePilot101 2 years ago 2
OKAY! Where will we mine it at? I don't think Mars has enough. :P
ethanhuntersmith 2 years ago
are you a girl
or a faggy boy?
303116789 2 years ago
FAIL
TriggDev 2 years ago
Yeah, this isn't the Big Bang...they should seriously consider renaming that theory, because "Big Bang" is such an awful name for it.
TheFortressMaximus 2 years ago
IT DIDNT EXPLODE!! IT EXPANDED.
atheistnarutofan 2 years ago 2
well no duh
haquearsh1 2 years ago
shite
mrblisterfist 2 years ago
so painfully boring,
and you need to pick up a psychics text book.
xnrcsx 2 years ago
is that entertaining?
haquearsh1 2 years ago
psychics? What would that have to do with anything? Perhaps you mean Physics?
Rainbowpikmin93 2 years ago
weird video...because its quite entertaining although its actually pretty lame in ways of...plot ^^
but u get 5 stars for the funny dots ^^
elethrion 2 years ago
it was 8th grade, what can I say
haquearsh1 2 years ago
Hmm... all the balls' voices sound the same... Intriguing.
BF2OMG 2 years ago
i realy dont see the point in this. is it anti big bang theory?
spinkydoodle101 2 years ago
the big bang wan't an explision it was an expansion over billions of billions of years.
Punkxshamrock45 2 years ago
This has good fact. Thanks for uploading. POP!
lyue1996 2 years ago
I like this video for the simple fact that it makes you ask questions about existance, religion and science. And you got 304 comments about a couple of dots... and everyone commenting about expansion not explosion, lol.... If they would just read a couple comments before trying to correct your project. This video is not a waste of time...!!! :)
GarryOsGirl4eva 2 years ago
Well thanks :)
Your one of the few positive comments this video's had haha
haquearsh1 2 years ago
As soon as I read "no, its not the least bit factual" I knew it would be incredibly stupid to attack you over it. Would you attack Matt Groening over the Simpsons because people aren't yellow? At the same time though, I knew heaps of people would attack you over it. I wish people would read descriptions.
Mitchillio 2 years ago