Added: 2 years ago
From: Ardachir94
Views: 160,910
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (377)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Plane for men, song for gays...

  • fag song fag video fag fag fag

  • no combat , thats shit video

  • If you're going to make a video comparing the two planes, you should include some more of their maneuvers.

  • Comment removed

  • this video would be much better if you would take this song off and put the sounds of the engins back in along with a narrator with a nice deep American voice.

  • F14 is imo the most beautiful jet fighter ever. Ever.

  • @basvanderzon the rafale is better

  • Americans are only good as making porn for the whole world , pollute the earth , cooking junk food , makes war for nothing , protect oil wells , destroy country culture , making video games ,and bombing  and this is the truth

  • 1min16 lol

  • f-14 is my fav jet ever :) i realy want to fly one some day

    

  • for surrendering no plane is needed

  • @chakands BR ? Nice try, HUEHUE.

  • at least is not the Youtube anthem

  • @BBEEAANN1 i think you are giving the SH a bit too much credit, from first hand experience, it cant do 1/4 of what the tomcat could do. the F-14D was a beast, and most certainly very effiecient at doing it's job, i only wish that the planned F-14E quickstrike would have continued, with it's planned improvements such as lighter weight,  more powerful 3D vectored thrust and reduced radar visibility, i think it would have easily been able to defeat the F-22, like it did everything else except F-15.

  • i think some 80's metal song or rock song would have been more in tune for this beast F14 forever

  • @BBEEAANN1

    they actually aren't looking for alternatives. The Royal Navy/Royal Air Force requested the F-35B and cancelled it... For the F-35C. It's not a waste of resources, you haven't even seen it in combat yet, so I wouldn't talk shit before you even see something in actual combat.

  • you must play a rock song.sorry for the english i'm foreign

  • @BBEEAANN1 um guess what, the f-22 does not have nearly as good of stealth as they are claiming it does have either, it is not an all weather aircraft, there are numerous production problems with it, and a total waste of money, the technology in it is worth something, but otherwise a waste and far to expensive

  • 1:53

    

  • Serious.... this is classique sh*t, too bad both of them are retired. I reckon french pilots are infamous for low flying stuff...

    Good compilation. How da hell did you get the shots.... I guess the US and FR had some some kind of NATO practise? Saw a F-14 and a Mirage in one shot...

  • @BBEEAANN1 Umm, ok whatever you say. And the f- 22 isnt even stealth, its stealthy but not full stealth like the f-35

  • @BBEEAANN1 Well thats why it doesnt come into service in a couple more years because they are fixing the bugs in it, and go ahead man, i know the f-14 is better then the f-18, but my favorite is the f-15 and f-16.

  • @TheZombieSlay3rs f-14 and f-15 are/were both top shelf, fighting platforms, f-18 is a pos and so is the f-16, neither one of these programs should have ever been built, they took money away from the best 2 fighter planes the world has ever seen in the F-14 and the F-15

  • @BBEEAANN1 Yeah thats the reason why its not gonna be in service for a couple more years, they are fixing the bugs, and the f-35 is multi roll, you can put anything on it.

  • @BBEEAANN1 Ok cool story, still never been shot down before, still an amazing aircraft, and could kill any other pilot in the world, just wait in till the F- 35 comes, its gonna dominate anything and everything, with full stealth and a multi roll aircraft, and can hit another plane from about 200 miles away with out even them knowing they were there, it will be a cold day in hell when that thing gets shot down

  • The F-14 obviously wins because the Mirage is a plane designed to surrender.

  • @GameReviewer1987 the f-14 wins because it can easily outfight the mirage, it flies high than the mirage can, faster than the mirage can, turns tighter than the mirage can, has better weapons than the mirage did, the mirage did not have the power in it's engine for high g dogfighting like the tomcat did. that is only a few of the reasons why the tomcat greatly outclassed the mirage, just like it outclassed f-18 and f-16, it was on an even playing field with the f-15.

  • @TheScrumpty

    It may have outclassed the F/A-18 and the F-16 models. I don't think it outclassed the F/A-18/E Super hornet, or the F-15C. The Mirage would have a hard time beating most 4th generation american jets. But the mirage is still effective. It outclasses most soviet jets in use today (Like the Mig-21, Mig-25 and would be competition for the Mig-29). So, undoubtedly it's agood plane.

  • @GameReviewer1987 yes it did outclass the F/A-18 E & F superhornets, both models of it, and yes you are right the mirage can not beat the F-14 or the F-15, but it also outclassed the F/A-18, but held its own against the F-16, i did not say that it outclassed the F-15, i said they are both on an even playing field, both the F-14 and F-15 were as capable as each other, the F-15 has a very slight weight advantage over tomcat, but noticable on paper only, in the air they are equals.

  • @TheScrumpty

    Well on paper it's the stats that matter. On paper the F-35 looks horrid.

    In actual performance it's better.

    Because if you have a shitty Su-34 pilot vs the world's best pilot flying a Mig-15 then the mig-15 pilot can win. The stats of the plane on paper may look different that but the stats you see generally apply they don't take into account

    Weather, Pilot Skill, differences of parts (Some work better than others due to manufacturing conditions) and more.

  • @GameReviewer1987 although what you are saying is true, but only to a point, i would put my money on the average su-34 pilot over the best pilot on the planet in the mig 15, i have known some extremely good F/A-18 pilots, and i mean really good ones, and i could regularly beat them in any tomcat i would fly, now i was not a great tomcat pilot, i would honestly rate myself in the upper 25% of every person to have ever flown the tomcat, so the equipment does make a difference also.

  • @GameReviewer1987 but you are right i have also seen a very few of those exceptional hornet/superhornet pilots that could beat a few of the tomcat pilots with lesser abilities, but they really had to work hard for those wins and be able to overcome the tomcat's abilities. like i said i was not one of the best tomcat pilots, but i was far from being one of the worst as well, and i maintained a 94% win ratio over the hornet. so newer is not always better.

  • 2:51 - "I'm gonna hit the breaks, he'll fly right by"

  • @BBEEAANN1 I worked for Grumman and that was going to be the Super Tomcat. Mach 3+ with the Aim 54 upgraded ALQ 100 radar, Would have been unmatched by any aircraft. But Boeing/McDonnell Douglas Had deeper pockets in congress and one again the US fighting man took it in the shorts...Just like the KC-35 tanker deal..already $500 million in over runs and it hasn't even flown yet.

  • LES DEUX AVIONS SONT INCOMPARABLE DEUX EPOQUES DIFERENTES C COMME COMPARER UNE 205 A UNE 207 ENFIN FAITE UN COMPARTIF ENTRE LE F 22 ET LE RAFALE!!!! PEACE

  • Mute the video and put the following song: addicted to the chaos of megadeth

    Enjoy! :D

  • Video is way better when muted.

  • 1:15 sky-quake!!

  • Je n'aime pas trop le Mirage. Le Tomcat de toute facon est superbe. J'aime plutot le Rafale et l'Eurofighter commes avions francais...

  • F-14 will be missed greatly.....LOL Jks F-15 is way better

  • jajajajajjjajjaja at 1:16

  • Kinda misleading seeing as how they didn't really do any manuvers. Still a funny vid, especially from 1:11 - 1:18

  • @BBEEAANN1 I agree with what you're saying, the Avionics on the F18 are far beond the F14 though, ive heard that straight from the horses mouth, the guys that fly them. All in all it comes down to the same thing that causes changes throughout the military in general, cost effectiveness. Im sure i dont have to tell you the flight to mantainence ratios the 14's had compared to the 18's.

    It's a shame theyre gone , were better of with them, the jerks that sign all the money away arent.

  • oh... le mirage... that small motherfucker... :D

  • @BBEEAANN1 Is the F18 realy that bad ? Well maybe Im wrong but is this world gone mad ? We are more than 20 years in the future.

  • Mettre dans le titre "Mirage 2000 "F"rançais" serait tout aussi con de préciser que le F14 est USA !!

  • 1:16 damm girl!!

  • insane low fly by

  • Plane for men, song for gays...

  • mirage is the best

  • @moi1000

    I love how you base your argument on a single photo. The people on the other sites also say that "no sensible judgement can be made from a single photo."

    We're living in the world of Photoshop. I could show you a photo of Belgium blowing up the moon. Also, I'd like to add that "locked-on" does not mean "defeats".

  • @BBEEAANN1

    Do you know that the Rafale doesn't need his rardar to get a lock ? The pilot can use the OSF

    Search for rafale kill F-22 on Google. You will find a picture of the Rafale's OSF getting a lock on a F-22

  • Look the title...

    F-14 TomCat:  Sexy

    Mirage: Bitch

  • @BBEEAANN1 i find it humorous as well, and you are right on the mark in your assessments, of the 2 aircraft, except one thing, do you really think the hornet or super hornet can actually do HALF of what the tomcat was capable of doing?????? as a former tomcat pilot i know for a fact that it can't and the maintenance figures for the tomcat especially the D model tomcats are exaggerated quite a bit, yes the number of maintenance hours were higher than hornet, but not excessively so.

  • @foliveira1982 It is not in production.

  • Why Tombcat vs. Mirage? F14 i a air to ground attack plane, mirage is a multi role but better on air to air missions...

  • @glnsmsk F-14 is a swept wing fighter aircraft, Capable of doing full afterburn and 9+ g turns, the F1 is just another mass produced french variant of the F-16.

    the F-14 Is dominant in all ways over the F-1.

  • @glnsmsk you are kidding yourself. mirage better at air to air than tomcat????????? wake up man, the mirage never stood a chance whenever i flew against them in ACM excercises, and in case you did not know the tomcat was multi-role as well, although it was not used for multi role for the first 20 years of it's service, it was multi-role from the day it was concieved

  • @glnsmsk the F-14 was an air superiority fighter, which also happened to be perfect for fleet defense mission as well, it could also perform ground attack, but was never its primary mission.

  • @glnsmsk

    It realy depend. Mirage 2000C and -5F are as you said, pure fighter, however as you probably know, Mirage 2000D & 2000N are definitely attack plane without air to air capacity (exept self defense weapons)

    So don't say Mirage 2000 are fighters, it depend of the version !

    (Anyway whatever the version Mirage looks better than F14 Haha ;D)

  • @FoxEcho6778 Well that's certainly a matter of opinion. I've always thought the F14 was the best looking thing in the sky. Each to their own.

  • @glnsmsk the F-14 is pre-dominantly an air-to-air interceptor with secondary ground attack role, so they both share similar roles, though the F-14 has a large radar compared to the Mirage

  • 1:15 fucking badass

  • Like the video

    Song sucks.

  • This video is bullshit.

  • @foliveira1982 SU-37 is not a 5th gen fighter and it's just a single prototype.

  • @floridafloyd1 F/A18 This is a ground fighter aircraft (Ground support)

    The added responsibility of Air War , This multi-purpose name

    In fact, the ground war.

  • @floridafloyd1 f22,f35, f/a 18 is occupied.High depreciation

    High cost of parts.

    Dassault Rafale The best fighter is versatile. Most countries are willing to buy

    This is the most advanced technology aircraft.

  • @SPYK30 F/A 18 Anti-tank aircraft , This is not a multi-purpose fighter aircraft.

    This is not a new generation of aircraft. Goodbye economy

  • @david87758 You have no idea what you're talking about. You can't even put together a sentence. The F/A-18E/F IS a multi-role fighter jet. I'd take the F/A-18E/F over the Rafale any day. And it's a joke to even compare it to the F-22 or the F-35. The Rafale lacks stealth and has less than 21st century radar. Come talk to me when you guys have a 5th generation fighter. Most likely, you'll buy it from us.

  • @floridafloyd1

    You surely are an experimented pilot who was flying on these two fighters to say that. ; )

  • @floridafloyd1 5th genration ? Lol

    At the beginning, Rafale was in the 4th generation. But after its confrontation with the F22 (1 for F22 and 5 equality), it was upgrad for "4++" generation (not 5 because it's not stealth).

    But the Rafale particularity is its extrem multipurpose, he can make several missions in the same time.

    Rafale identified and destroyed tragets with 30-40 km while it's usually made with 4-5 km.

    He has a vast weapons panel, and a high-level handiness

    It makes it only

  • @floridafloyd1 Well, we'll buy it the moment they can fly a whole year without being grounded and without costing 5 times more than a 4+++ gen multirole fighter. Oh and when the other contracting countries will aslo have all of the features they pay for it. Face it, the US produced excellent 4th generation fighter, but 5th gen, as they planned to make it, are worthless.

  • @floridafloyd >Do not have an understanding of the aircraft,

    Rafale began production in 2000, The basic model was first built in 1986

    14 years in the aircraft being tested in harsh conditions ,

    4 december 2000, final orders were issued for aircraft production.

    Rafale Is a multi-purpose fighter ,The technology is very advanced.

    Americans can only claim , america's economy is also very clear

    u.s.a is economic crisis can not be treated more , f22 is a piece of iron

  • @david87758

    The F/A-18E/F has seen more use, is more capable, and is cheaper than the Rafale. Also in terms of the world economy the US isn't doing that bad.

  • @SPYK3O more capable ? i don't think so. F/A-18E/F is much less handleable and is slower. for air-air mission Rafale outclass F18.

    max external payload.: 8,050 kg+ F/A-18E/F / 9,500 kg for Rafale. once again Rafale has the edge for weaponry capacity. (14 hardpoints

    about costs the Rafale is more expensive to buy but is cheaper to maintain.

  • @xenomorphelv426

    Wikipedia "expert" eh? I'm calling you on the cheaper to maintain because you have absolutely no way of knowing or effectively looking that information up on the internet.

  • Laissez tomber les ricains ... la technologie française est la meilleure ! Vive le Mirage 2000 et son fils le Rafale . (Let fall the competition american people ... french technology is the best ! Viva the Mirage 2000 and its son, the rafale .)

  • @Poulirocknroll

    La technologie ne fait pas l'armée ni une guerre mais c'est la façon de l'utiliser qu'il la fait :) , les français non pas une capacité réelle de déploiement de leurs forces aériennes leurs avion ne peuvent pas accomplir toutes les mission aux quelles elle pourront être confronté, les americains ne neglige pas sur leurs supérioté aériennes , avions furtif , bombardiers , multirole , etc ... , c'est pour sa que le Tiger Meet existe s'entrainé avec ses alliés ...

  • Still I dont think this video was 'seriously' meant to be a real deal of comparing the two jets, more for the show off and free flight

  • A battle against a F 18 Hornet would be more obvious than battling an old retired jet that did its job well when it was good back in the days. Its like comparing a Lambo from begin 90's and a todays one.

  • whats the song?

  • @klimeification Sexy chick (david guetta ft akon)

  • lawl 1:16

  • nice vid

  • tomcat won.

  • lmao! (rolls up his eyes!!) Ok then lets try - a more sting inducing argument VIETNAM........ The French tried and failed .....America tried and failed......Afghanistan ...the Soviets in the 70's and 80's tried and failed ....the US and Britain together can't win in Afghanistan! It all depends on your point of view doesn't it?

  • @MovieMad007

    dude, your war was based on tea trade..gimme a break....

  • @endsocialbias lol anyone for a brew?????? lmao!!!!

  • omfg i would love to go 21ft onver the ocean and spin up arround

  • Mirage 2000..hehe

    That delta wing bleeds mach so bad that after a couple three jinks he's pressed into a low-speed fight way behind cornor speed. Game over. Rafale is by far the superior knife-fighter, and with superior avionics to boot, does the BVR mission more effectively as well.

    Look for the Mirage 2000 fleet to start trickling into lower tier air forces as front line outfits try to ditch that sled.

  • @US uneducated people

    France lost 400 000 men during the first two WEEKS of fighting with Germany in WWII and of course I do not even mention the 150 000 men we lost on the battle of Verdun ALONE during WWI so pls show some respect instead of demonstrating your abject ignorance.

    By the way, do you know how many French civilians died during US allied bombing in WWII ? More than 50 000, which is comparable to US casualty in Vietnam...

  • @US uneducated people

    France lost 400 000 men during the first two WEEKS of fighting with Germany in WWII and of course I do not even mention the 150 000 men we lost on the battle of Verdun ALONE during WWI so pls show some respect instead of demonstrating your abject ignorance.

    By the way, do you know how many French civilians died during US allied bombing in WWII ? More than 50 000, which is comparable to US casualty in Vietnam...

  • All i have to say is MOI is a delusional idiot who has no insight into military aviation he is a bitter Canadian who thinks he knows something from playing video games all have to say is LOCKHEED SKUNK WORKS remember the name because it will KICK YOUR SORRY ASSES every time :)

  • which  one faster f14 or mig 2000?

  • @leHappiste

    first of all, the mirage, rafales, and f-16 are pretty much equal in when it comes down to it. Secondly, the pride and joy and what I would call the main fighter of the US airforce is the f-22. I'm not talking about numbers of planes in service. France has the eurofighter, which isn't French so it shouldn't really be considered, and it is still much worse than the f-22. The f-18 is better than the mirage and so is the f-15 for what it does. btw your welcome for WWII bailout frog.

  • @Jonathanfroglegs11

    i'm french submariner,sorry for my english.

    the france don't have eurofighter,we just have rafale,mirage2000,mirage F1 and alphajet.

    I agree with you,but the big big problem of the rafale and F22 is the price...

    I would have love to have some F35 for us(the navy) in order to put them on the BPC (mistral,tonerre,dixmude)...ve­ry interseting plane...

    the france is very pride of is nuclear powered carrier and the rafale is a very good multirole fighter

  • @grotwix then,we can't compare the rafale and tomcat and all thoses planes,the rafale is a multirole fighter like F16 or F18

    the france havent enough money to develop a omnirole fighter...so the F22 and all american omnirols fighter are very perfomant in their utilisation

    but i think the best multirole fighter of the world is the rafale.then the eurofighter and the the saab gripen...

  • The F14 Tomcat was never designed as dogfighter, rather a standoff fleet defense aircraft, despite the ridiculous scenes in the movie TopGun.

  • Bottom line is when comparing these two aircraft, the f-14 is on of the United States' worste fighter jets in service, while the mirage is the main fighter jet of France.

  • @Jonathanfroglegs11

    And so what?

    Anyway Mirages and Rafales are better than F16, the main fighter of US airforce.

  • @LeHappiste may be better but we got way way way way way better weapons then you. Then anybody .

  • @TheZombieSlay3rs No you dont? your fucking stupid, You weapons suck, Including planes, guns, tanks, nukes etc, learn your facts, The USA is the most powerful country, And don't you fucking dare to even start a fight saying "oh russia and china are stronger then you" yeah maybe by population, And russia may have the biggest nuke but its not like they can get in between 500 to 600 miles from the usa, because we have shit built that will launch a nuke and destroy their fleet, you dont have shit.

  • @Jonathanfroglegs11 Its not in service and hasn't been in a long time, learn your facts

  • @TheZombieSlay3rs that changes nothing about my point, so there was really no point in saying it besides saying "look at me guys I play COD and read wikipedia on the military!!!". And fyi, the f-14 is not in active duty, but still in service. despite what losers like you read up about on wikipedia about all of the jets being destroyed and scraped, I just last week performed a training exercise in MY f-15C with 16 other jets, 2 of which were f-14 tomcats. suckadick

  • @Jonathanfroglegs11 Your fucking stupid, Its retired you dumb ass. And wow you flew our fighter jets because you guys are to poor or to lack of technology and can't build your OWN. And its not in service in the usa dipshit, You know where i live, The f-18 is our new f-14, This is the kind of stupidity that gets your asses injured or killed, i hope one day we get in a war with you because then you guys are fucked, so suckadick

  • @TheZombieSlay3rs I'm American asshat, I fly in the 44th fighter sqaudron. Suck my balls.

  • @Jonathanfroglegs11 Then you should really change your country

  • @TheZombieSlay3rs you're right it's not very patriotic to FUCKING GO OUT AND RISK MY LIFE FOR MY COUNTRY EVERY DAY. Sorry my youtube account says zimbabwe.

  • @Jonathanfroglegs11 Well im sorry, I thought you were African,

  • @Jonathanfroglegs11 You know absolutely nothing about the F-14. The F-14 is one of the greatest fighters that was ever flown in the world and easily beat F-16 in ACM exercises. It also handily defeated F-15's before they got upgrades to their avionics that Dick Chenney stopped the F-14 from getting. If the F-14 had gotten its upgrades there is nothing in the sky that would have been able to fly with it.

  • I could just see the mirage being hit by a big wave while flying low.

  • USA will never admit to being helped... their ego depends on it. Don't bother arguing semantics. F-22 Raptor is a very advanced plane but I do not know specs and the likes so I won't pretend to know what I'm talking about. Unless you're a pilot or work with these type of planes... one can only gobble up what media says about these aircraft's.

  • 0:18 nice

  • could have picked justin beiber song would be better than this shit

  • Also the Netherlands is one of those small countries that puts a lot of tax money in American Fighter Jets and we still havent got those amount of JFS' s here as promised. Still this has nothing to do with the populace (Americans,French,Germans) whatsoever. Its the gov. and some communist leaders that manipulate this world as it is now.

  • Comment removed

  • @Ardachir94 Explique-moi en quoi un F14 est bien meilleur qu'un mirage 2000...

    Pour pas dire de conneries je regarde en 1 seconde sur wikipedia :

    vitesse ascensionnelle : 18000m/min (2000) vs 9145 (f14)

    plafond : 18000m (2000) vs 15700m (f14)

    vitesse max : 2653km/h (2000) vs 2485km/h (f14)

    carburant : 9,4 tonnes (2000) vs 9,1 (f14)

    rayon d'action : 1600km (2000) vs 927 (f14)

    ...

    Ça veut pas tout dire mais quand-même... je suis curieux de savoir en quoi il est tellement mieux !

  • encore faut il savoir faire la difference entre les deux!!

  • ahahah 2:48

  • mirage 2000 is the best !! that's my opinion .

    vive les usa et la france !!

  • I could not even imagine worse music accompanying this montage.

  • inveja desses pilotos

  • 2:46, Lol at the Pilot.

  • Iran-Iraq War:

    11 IRIAF F-14 shot down 75-130 MIrages, in that case MIrage sucks,

    But both planes are so kickass:)

  • Что Ф-14, что Мираж, говно самолеты!

  • awesooome vid ! XDD

  • Just rememebr... American pilots have been on rotating combat tours now since 1991.... who has more combat time in the seat?? Think about it...

  • Mirage 2000 = cute, sexy

  • two different planes with different missions, still, awesome in all ways with both planes

  • Top gun!!! vs... vs... A real airfroce? MAHAHAH

  • @fable2omg You are comparing a a plane that is not even in service with the "Best" your country have to offer? Everybody knows the United States have the best pilots and planes in the world, its nice you love your planes and country but in a dog fight we would kick your ass back to the stone age :) plain and simple and even a jet as old as the tomcat can do it because a tomcat as old as it was couldve tracked 24 targets simultaneously and killed six as the same time your plane couldnt do that!

  • @Toddie4usa5 Not so sure because your tomcat has no Electronic counter measures like the Mirage does!

    And I'm not french anyway, I love the tomcat, Tough airplane.

    But I'm not sure if the american pilots *ARE* the best, I think the best pilots would come from Israel Seriously, Because their pilots have already seen action a lot of times. Even Red Flag can't totally prepare a pilot for the real stuff.

    Your patriotism is Plain, and simple. That is a fact, you should look around sometimes :)

  • @fable2omg Helloooo every fighter aircraft have electronic counter measures in them try again and yes I am patriotic that is clear and also Red Flag is an Air Force combat exercise Tomcats are Navy and Navy pilots trained through the Top Gun school and Navy system which is different from the Air Force, Israeli pilots have more combat time but that does not necessarily make them the best ... I am looking around and Ive been around them thats why I can say when I am saying :)

  • @Toddie4usa5 Your country tried in vain to copy the epic French ECM friend! I'm not talking about the ridiculous undercarriage stuff you have I'm talking about Onboard ECM like the "JAM" on the F/A-18 except that the one on the super-hornet is the 80's french model ;)

  • @Toddie4usa5

    1) Mirage 2000 is not the "best" our country can offer. It's the Rafale

    2) Last year in the UAE, a Rafale virtually shot down a F-22 (thanks the EOS =) ). You can found the picture on Internet. Search for it

    3) The F-22s are not allowed to fly due to a BIG problem with the OBOGS. Is it really your best plane ? =)

    4) The Rafale is known as the Hornet-killer in the US Navy. I don't think that a little old cat will be a problem =)

  • @moi1000 Gotta love you frenchies. You BARELY beat 1970's designs with your newest shit in some friggin game and think you can talk about who's better? Come back to reality and recognize the cold hard truth. Its called a "combat record", and our's is clearly superior in air to air and air to ground combat than france's. And the US Navy calls it a Rafale, NOT the hornet killer. The HUD in that pic you're referring to isn't even the same as a Rafale's. Photoshop. Get over yourself frenchie.

  • @moi1000 Are you kidding me? VIRTUAL? WTF kind of crack are you smoking we are talking LIVE COMBAT real pilot real plane not some bullshit video game, ...F22 my dear one is the ONLY 5th generation Stealth in full production and in the fleet Secondly a Rafale got its ass kicked by an F16 flown by a NUGGET Pakistani pilot a month ago .Thirdly dont use the OBOGS thing as an excuse F22s are flying test missions out in Cali already the fix is on the way!!!!! Admit it we have the best thanks to LM

  • @Toddie4usa5

    Yes, VIRTUAL ! Do you really think that the pilots use real missiles when they are training ? Are you totally stupid ???

    Do you know that the french air force never do combat training with Pakistan ? Did you know that last month, the Rafales were over Libya, not in Pakistan ? =)

    And do you know that were some exercices between USAF F-16s and Rafales.

    Look this : /watch?v=wXtQkxE9qCY

    I won't tell you the results, you will cry.

  • @Toddie4usa5

    And yes, the "fix is on the way" but not here NOW. So the F-22s are all grounded.

    And the F-22s is unable to do what the Rafales did over Libya.

  • @moi1000 Fix already in place dude get real :) I know you guys hate hearing American technology is the best but deal with it we do have the best planes and pilots your "Rafale" is years behind everything we have you just cant admit it its ok we can SMELL THE FEAR in your sweat!! :)

  • @Toddie4usa5

    The american technology is the best... when it works !!! =).

    And I will not admit what it's wrong. But I can admit that a F-22 was "shot down" by a Rafale and the photo is not photoshoped =)

    During the lest Red Flag, the F-22s pilotes were crying because they were unabled to "kill" a Rafale. And you know why ? Because french ECM are the best in the world.

    They were unable to lock on a Rafale, but our pilots were laughing when they were recording the AN/APG-77 signals.

  • @Toddie4usa5

    All you are saying are lies (training vs Pakistan, etc...) =)

    Grow up and stop believing USA are always the best. If you need help, search for the word "humble" in a dictionnary.

  • @moi1000 You are a moron seriously get a life your country is 30 years behind in technology

  • @Toddie4usa5

    So, it means :

    80s french technology = 2011 US technology

    Right ? =)

    You just say "we are the best", but when someone ask "why ?", you don't know what you can answer. So you say "you're a moron" or something.

    You are just like Colin Poweel in 2003 when he said there were WMDs in Iraq, and trying to discredit France. 8 years later, you don't even found one.

    So I repeat : learn what the word "humble" means

  • @moi1000 Dude you are so trying to backstep you know that American technology is ahead of the French always have been and always will be thats why we had to bail you guys out during World War II I mean come on you let the Germans walk all over your asses :) haha!! We were building and flying unmanned aircraft when you guys were still in biplanes and we were building stealth aircraft when you guys were still TESTING your Mirage!! think about it American Technology will always be the best!!! :)

  • @Toddie4usa5

    Is the F-22 "active stealth" ? No. It's stealth because of his shape. But you can change easily the shape of an aircraft. So, it will be detected in the near future.

    Is the Rafale "active stealth" ? Yes. There's a "active stealth" system in SPECTRA. It's easy to update a system like that. It's only software and sensors.

  • @moi1000 F-22 has both dork. And active is not a replacement for shape and materials. Why do you think they call the F-22 Generation 5.

  • @r1cw

    The F-22 hasn't both, only passive.

    The active stealth system receive the signal of the enemy radar and send a dephased signal. So the enemy radar can't detect the aircraft. The F-22 and the F-35 only use their shape to be stealth.

    5th generation means nothing. It's just like if I call the Rafale a 6th generation aircraft. What more the F-22 has ? Nothing. And the Rafale can do air/ground missions. The F-22 can only use 2 JDAM, no laser-guided bombs, etc...

  • @moi1000 Do you really believe the that? 5th generation means nothing? No one cares what YOU call aircraft. But it does matter what the military/aviation complex does. I mean really, that's a silly thing to say. And radar can not be defeated by active systems, only hampered to a small degree. If that was true then why is Russia and China investing untold millions in stealth shapes and materials. F-22 is a AIR SUPERIORITY first and fore most. Everything else is secondary.

  • @moi1000 You dont even know what active stealth truly is go back to playing second rate video games and leave the aviation conversation to those in the know... :) I know i rattle your cage every time i tell you that the French got their asses kicked numerous times because you know its the truth

  • @Toddie4usa5

    Now, WW2. Just one example : battle of Monte Cassino. The americans were unable to defeat the germans so they called the french. Then the germans had to retreat.

    Oh, and where were the aircrafts that we have bought in 1939 ? You know, P-40, etc... ?

    We gave the money but we NEVER saw a P-40 coming from the US.

    Oh and don't forget your independance war. Washington's army started to win battles ony when french soldiers arrived in America.

  • @moi1000 Maybe true about that history but without the US alliance I think you french wouldnt do it all alone, the same goes for the French revolution when actualy the originated germans known as Prussia drove your Napoleon away with many English and Dutch soldiers at the front of Waterloo.

    Still what I agree with is that the US has its bad sides like sucking the 'black coloured' money out of the world and let Europe know where they stand (in 2nd place) while we pay the big price for it

  • @moi1000 You are so delusional its not even funny anymore, if you guys could even imagine what skunk works did 40 years ago you would be in good company, face facts you will never be as good as we are so keep dreaming American Independence was won by Americans you are truly scraping at the bottom of the barrel dude ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @Toddie4usa5

    What navy won the battle of Chesapeake Bay ? The US Navy ? There was NO Us Navy at that time !!!

    Who won the battle of Yorktown ? The french army !!! It's the french soldiers who assaulted the redoubts.

    It's only 2 examples.

    In 1776, Philadelphia was under Washington's control. And before, the French army arrived, he lost control of this city.

    Without the French, NO independence for the USA !!!

    You're so arrogant, Toddie

  • @moi1000 and it's also valid for you by the way...

  • @Rostokouban

    1) The US alone wouldn't have been able to beat the germans and the japanese

    2) France was part of the Allied forces. battle of Bir Hakeim, battle of Monte Cassino, French Caraibs, Polynesia and equatorial Africa, etc... The Germans NEVER conquered ALL the french territory, so they NEVER won against us during WW2. That's why general Sevez in Reims and general De Lattre de Tassigny in Berlin signed the act of capitulation of Germany.

  • @moi1000 Why are you posting this on a video about F14 and mirage??? I don't care...and by the way the french territory wasn't all occupied because petain collaborated with hitler lol...

  • @moi1000 hashahahah keep telling u that, whats the french favorite word I SURRENDER. fuckin french u held out for three weeks the germans lost 30,000 troops during the invasion of france, and the Magino line or however you spell it, u put that shit on ur border with germany and they went around it hahahah dumb french ur guns could only shoot forward they werent 180 degree turrets u helped at max 4-5 % during the war, we gave billions to russia, france, england we saved the world THAT WHY WER G