Ron Paul: Fed "spending freeze" protects obsolete programs

[peaceonhotdogs]

They gave the banks the money and the banks are hoarding, wonder why? Could it be because they failed not to long ago. Now that they got bailed out and got handed 0% intrest rates they're saying "oh no sister girl, I aint blowing my money on Tyrone this time". Especially after the Federal Goverment is about to start trials on the housing bubble. Tyrone is like "Come on baby I owe my friend money, can't you let him take you raw, I promise I won't ruff you up later, come on baby"

[frankiegmh]

responsible*

[frankiegmh]

I would rather be free and resonsible for my oun saftey, than safe without freedom,

[unclesamsbastardson]

@frankiegmh yeah because there is a place in this world that lives completely "free" .. your definitiion of freedom is anarchy. Go see how america's enemiesw live under communism and religious fanatics..

[frankiegmh]

Actually we are supose to be completely free in this country, do you realize how crazy that remark is you just made? Do you really think it was the intentions of the formers of our government after just fighting a war against the largest empire in the world and winning their freedom that they would decide on a model of government that would limit their freedoms in any way? I don't want anarchy, but I would take it over being a slave any day of the week and I think most people would agree with me

[EdgeMugga]

Our lives arent something to be spent by others. In order to have a life, we must each own our own lives separately, as individuals. When we forsake living according to the law of contradiction and submit to regulation by the law of participation, life ceases to have meaning, and the terrorists win. Terrorism aside, only a real pinhead would seek to keep us safe at the expense of liberty.

[unclesamsbastardson]

@EdgeMugga sounds like something the manson familly would say..

[EdgeMugga]

What does it mean to be safe as chattel of the state. One cannot argue rationally to human beings into livestock. We are encouraged to "Live free or die," an observation concerning real alternatives. For every moment the state controls us, we are effectively dead that is without life. What is there to keep safe, as a being without a life?

[TerrorWarrior5000]

Ron Bin Laden takes his marching orders from Al Queda.

[littlebuddy149722]

TerrorWArrior: who do you take your marching orders from?

[TerrorWarrior5000]

Real patriots who don't surrender to the terrorist and want to keep America safe.

[littlebuddy149722]

haha. A real tough guy, huh? Typical redneck. All braun and no brains.

Wanna learn something? Look up the following: McCollum memo, Benjamin Freedman. That's a good start.

Your country has been infested with domestic enemies for so long that it looks normal to you.

[RidleyReport]

patriots don't live for "safe"

[TerrorWarrior5000]

You say that now only when you are being kept safe by our terrorist ass kicking millitary, if your palleosurrenderman ever gets elected there will be a nuke going off in an American city everyday for the next 100 years. I bet you will want your safety back then.

[FlailingJunk]

I don't care what a fundamentalist christian politician has to say about anything.

Less Ron Paul please.

[greenback001]

Ron Paul's religous beliefs should not make one iota of a difference in regard to him being a representative for his district, a voice for his constituents. As well, his religon has nothing to do with his sworn oath to serve and defend the US Constitution. Imagine you and whatever beliefs you had (save for harm to others) if you serve the same political principles I just described, then you'd be a similar representative as Ron Paul... So, what's your beef?

Are you against freedom?

.

[FlailingJunk]

I would never presume to represent anyone other then myself. I would never participate in the political process because that has been a complete and total failure in limiting government.

Ron Paul has done so much damage to the cause of real freedom that if he did not exist the government would have invented him.

[greenback001]

I would never dictate to another what belief system they should adhere to. But I'd feel guilty if I didn't let you in on a little secret: as far as ideology goes throughout history,  pessimism has never been out front.

Good luck with the attitude.

[FlailingJunk]

Stop projecting.

[Malbrojia]

@FlailingJunk Im as atheist, or better yet Anti-theist as they come, but couldnt disagree w/you more. His conclusions are NOT based upon any xian, or theological premises and should be taken on their own merit independently. If he said 2+2=4 you would disagree? Dont be a douche! Its just too bad xianity is a prereq, anything else is political suicide, due to Christians w/ your same idiotic illogic.

[Chrisnoscrub047]

ok so this is cool. I was about to comment this: "Starbucks may be standing up for the 2nd amendment but they are simultaneously against legislation that would legalize marijuana." but since i wanted to find my source and post it I found this "When 70 Percent Support Marijuana Legalization, Starbucks Gets The Message" Google whats in quotes.