The more Obama's operatives and lemmings demonize Beck, the more thinking Americans love Beck. It's obvious that, if they demonize Beck, Beck represents a threat to them. They help us understand that if we want to defend ourselves from Obama, his comrades, and his Marxist scams (Obamacare, cap and trade, etc.), we have to support patriots like Beck. So we SUPPORT BECK and patriots like Beck!
What can I say? I made this video 2 and-a-half years ago, when I still thought people like Beck were worth responding to. By now it's certainly clear to anyone interested in legitimate discourse that he's just a clownish distraction. But hey, since you stopped by, how about defining "Islamo-Fascist" for us?
I hope you're not expecting a pretentious neo-con troll-boy like Supermassively to answer your question. How could he? He spends so much time regurgitating the same idiotic and tired ass "the GWB Administration can't be wrong" propaganda! :D
Leftist terrorist group has nothing to do with socialism or communism, it simply means any violent group that wants to make a change to their country.
Right terrorists want to bring their country back to some form of government of the past. The only reason Right terrorist are so "politically right" is because the past is filled with right wing politics rather than left wing. Left wing has become a more recent change in history.
LOL Glenn Beck is worried about Ron Paul turning political discourse into violence? How ironic.
This cozy partisan Mr. Beck enriches himself in his ignorance of the politicians who actually DO that in the world, and projects blame he deserves onto one of the only individuals in govt who doesn't deserve it.
A self-proclaimed libertarian who supported the Patriot Act and the $850 Billion Socialist Bailout. And now that the partisan shoe is on the other foot? He's a "libertarian" again.
Clearly. He has made and continues to make some truly idiotic comments. Like his agreement with a guest the other day that the U.S. needs to be attacked again. He's no doubt easily manipulated as well. Blow a lot of sunshine up his backside, give him his own tv show, pay him a bunch of money, and he'll gladly do your pro-war, fascist media bidding.
wow, i guess someone has alot of time on their hands, how scary....so, people who disagree with you politically don't deserve to be part of our media? who's the facist?
It's not about disagreeing politically. It's about Beck using his position in the media to scare people into not supporting Ron Paul, with his completely baseless suggestion that the increase in the number of Paul supporters also increased the threat of terrorism. It was a reckless, ignorant abuse of the peoples' airwaves, and clearly indicative of a partisan status quo agenda being pushed by Beck and the people who pay his salary. The guy is a worthless corporate media tool.
Osama Bin Laden is a leftist terrorist, Bush and the neo cons are most definitely fascists.
This should be evident, of course most people don't even understand the definition of fascism....
We're a dumb species, we want to be brainwashed, we want someone to tell us what to think and what to do. I think group think is just a direct result of living in a society, in order to survive better we conform. You'll never get rid of that unfortunately.
Oh my fucking God you're a moron, he IS a leftist terrorist, learn the definition of leftist terrorist. Leftist terrorists are terrorists that are for change in a specific region, that is their idea of change. By that definition he is a leftist terrorist, a terrorist on the right would be for bringing back something from the past.
Glenn Beck supports Ron Paul now, how weird. But the government did send out a document to missouri law enforcement. Saying that people with Ron Paul bumperstickers could be domestic terrorists.
You're referring to the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) report dated 02/20/09. They're also attacking supporters of Bob Barr, who was the Libertarian Party candidate for president, and Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin. It's a hopelessly transparent attempt to intimidate people into not supporting third parties and real change.
MUST READ: Chuck Baldwin's direct response to the MIAC. Go to his website and look in his archives for "My Response To MIAC Report." - Pass it on.
Jerry, you are so right. I was one Ron Paul's delegates. The Christian stations (Radio) are manipulating people with shame if they vote third party. I have voted third party for the last several elections. Chuck Baldwin was the best candidate, Ron Paul endorsed him. THANKS!
my mom loves glenn beck... she is brainwashed tho kinda she is started to realize but she still likes him i dunno maybe glennb eck changed... but she also likes juiliani for some reason i dont get it doesnt make sense... they are all scum
I checked out your channel to see if you could cure my ignorance, but all I found was a monster truck video and something about making a cheap high def speaker. LMAO indeed. This video was done a year ago, when I still thought people like Beck were worth responding to. I have since turned off all TV news and talking heads completely. You should try it. Do some real homework. Use the critical thinking skills you were born with. You might just learn something of value that you can share.
If you didn't care what I think you wouldn't have commented on the video in the first place. I'm not here for popularity. I'm here to share truth that the pathetic "mainstream" media doesn't have the cojones to deal with, and because silence is unacceptable. And trust me - when you're my age (if you're really 23 like your channel says), you won't think it's so bad. You'll realize, if you're lucky, that age is a state of mind and that being "old" is better than being dead.
I'll be lucky if I die way before the nurses have to change my diaper in a shit stenched nursing home. I sure can't wait to get old! And why on earth would I have to lie about my age?
But we agree somewhere. The media and there liberal bias sucks, but I still don't need 1 of million biased bloggers to tell me what to think.
um.. hes actually right you are just brainwashed and scared of the truth... why dont you have some fuckin respect for people who actually know whats going on asshole!
Can't say that I disagree with you now. But when I did that video five months ago, his claim that Ron Paul supporters could become terrorists was fresh, and an obvious attempt to scare people away from Dr. Paul. I realize it's hard for some to believe, but some people actually buy the garbage that people like Beck spew on a regular basis. I think sometimes it's worth it to step up and put propaganda goons like him in their place.
This video was done (in November 2007) in response to Beck's completely unsupported suggestion that it wasn't safe to support Ron Paul because some of his supporters could resort to violence. I call that propaganda. Other than that, he's just another mostly vacant talking head with nothing of real value to offer...Part of a worthless mainstream TV media that is more concerned with sensationalism and ratings than keeping the American people fully and accurately informed.
"beck is a fascist tool and we're all victims of the neocon media machine!!!" 'Glenn Beck is a fearmonger?' You bet your ass he is. And for the record, if you've listened to Glenn Beck for any length of time, YOU WOULD KNOW that the tantrums Beck has thrown makes the title of this video sound like Sunday school material. To suggest otherwise is fear mongering, calling the kettle black, and just flat out lying.
I've watched Glenn Beck on CNN, and I've listened to him for years. I think you over estimate your estimation, in fact I'm sure of it. Glenn Beck IS AFRAID of calling a spade a spade from time to time...especially now that he's on TV. Anyone who has listened to him for years, and I have since before 2003, know that he's capable of back peddling, hedging and giving himself an "out" just like any other celeb commentator. Glenn Beck is human and more then capable of hyperbole and overstatement.
I'd say his admission that he's not legit lends credence to my view about him. Well, that and the fact that he says ridiculous things like wanting to frech kiss Ron Paul for his stance on taxes, and that people who hate America were losing their homes in the California fires last year. Doesn't take more than one or two of those juvenile gems to prove his illegitimacy. His shows are a waste of valuable media space.
You're right. I didn't say that. I said my video was in response to that segment, and I gave it what I thought (and still think) was an appropriate title. Don't forget that logic and context is a two-way street.
Talk about blatant sweeping accusations! I call all who don't agree with me ignorant neocons? That's funny, I don't recall saying that about you. Whether or not Beck fits the textbook definition of fascism, he sure as hell is NOT a legitmate journalist.
In that segment, yes. And I hardly see how simply pointing that out makes ME a fearmonger. But I might agree that anyone who thinks today's MSM doesn't have an extreme credibility problem is a victim. Of their own ignorance.
He didn't need to call Ron Paul supporters terrorists. His obvious goal with that segment was to scare people into not supporting Paul, who represents the real change in government that the corporate media (you know, the one Beck works for?) is not interested in.
My video was solely in response to Beck's fearmongering segment about how Ron Paul supporters could become terrorists. He was clearly trying to scare people into not supporting Paul. Hackery indeed. Pure propaganda. As far as Olbermann goes, I ignore the partisan crap. I look for truth and accuracy, of which there is more on his show than all those others I mentioned combined. Regardless of how you label them, they're about NOTHING but radical right spin and avoiding any and all ugly truth.
I love how people just throw the word fascist around. If you actually bothered to listen to more then a few minutes of his show you would know that he is not the biggest fan of Bush.
Stop getting your news from media matters. Better yet, go jump in front of a bus.
Who's just throwing it around? If you can't see the march toward full blown fascism in this country, your're just another fascist tool, whether you realize it or not. Just like Beck. But his scaremongering suggests he knows exactly what he's doing.
I don't get my news from media matters. I simply mentioned it as one source people should check out. That's how people with a clue do things. They consider multiple sources and come to well reasoned conclusions. You should try it some time.
what exactly makes him a fascist? The fact that he is against the idea of the nanny state? I suggest you crack open a dictionary before making baseless assumptions.
I absolutely see the march towards fascism, but it certainly isnt coming from the right.
Take the time to actually listen to his show, and then try again.
As I stated in another response above, this video was solely in response to the segment where Beck was purposely trying to scare people into NOT supporting Paul, by suggesting that his supporters could resort to terrorism. Granted it doesn't necessarily make him a fascist, but I saw it as pushing the fascist/corporatist agenda. Right or left, doesn't matter. It's all the same inside the Beltway. Perhaps he just saw it as politics. I don't care. I stand by my view and make no apologies for it.
Ron Paul says that tax dollars don't sustain gov't the federal reserve does and the power to print money. I think you were wrong there somewhere around 2:35
Well he's prolly right that tax dollars don't matter much. The fed makes a profit by lending. They also control interest rates and the amount of lending by adjusting rates. They also increase inflation by printing money which makes tax dollars and all dollars worth less.
I like you, I like your voice, I like your ideas. I have a problem though. You overused the word bootlicker. I would through in butt kiss, cock sucker, etc. The best thing we can probably do is turn off the TV.
Right on. I noticed that myself after I put the vid up. Thanks for the word suggestions ;-)
Right on with turning off the TV too. Anything that tries to represent itself as "news," anyway. I can't even watch Olbermann anymore because of that bullshit company he works for.
After Reagan DEregulation and the death of the Fairness Doctrine, the NEOCONS encouraged and financed the take over of AM radio by ultra-conservative propagandists. Glenn Beck is one. Sadly it would take repeated personal confessions be leading NEOCONS to get the deceived sheeple to reverse their dedication to the fascist NEOCON deceit.
Wow your a MORON! You really can not think like this.
I am not a NEO-CON I am a follower of the Constitution not Bush. I believe maybe half of what Paul says. I am a Realist, Terrorism is a real threat. I support the war in Iraq not because I support the imperialistic tendencies but its to late now. by the way
I always like a good laugh early in the morning. Thanks. I will say you are right about one thing, however: Terrorism is a real threat. But the Pretender-in-Chief's illegal war of choice has only made it worse. Are you actually saying you support the war just because we're there ("too late now")? You and Huckabee deserve each other.
Pretender and Chief's illegal war huh. If I may remind you he had massive support from both sides of the aisle. Secondly, I do not support the war in Iraq it was unnecessary and poorly handled. On the other hand now we are in their country should we not at least try to bring peace. Third, I disagree with the Patriot act it in the wrong hands is a dangerous weapon against liberty, I am not saying it is in the best hands now.
People supporting something doesn't make it legal. This war is illegal and immoral. It is there country, we have no right and no obligation to protect it, and in so doing dictate to them how they should live and what kind of government they should have. If you support Huckabee, what do you like about his policies? What is his plan to avert the coming financial crisis? What is his plan for financing this needless war for the next 100 years?
Sure he had bipartisan support. That's because he lied to Congress (which is a felony - just one of the mountain of crimes he's guilty of) to get it. The Patriot Act is wrong no matter whose hands it's in. It was never meant to protect us. It was designed solely to subvert our constitutional rights. And peace cannot be brought by force. Iraq will NEVER be peaceful as long long as we're there.
oh what Crimes is he guilty of. where is your evidence. You sound like a Sycophant "Boot Licker" "Neo Con buffoons". You sound like the idiot in the piece and remember your being compared to Bush
warrantless spying/lying to congress/illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq (against U.S. & international law)/violation of United States law 18 U.S.C Sec. 2340A, which forbids a United States citizen from committing or conspiring to commit the offense of torture outside of the United States/willful violation of laws passed by Congress/ignoring subpoenas duly issued by Congress/ignoring the Constitution he swore to uphold...This could go on for a while. Looks like you need to do some homework.
Apparently you've been watching too much radical right trash TV. You probably listen to Rush and Hannity every day too. Get a clue, junior. It was Glenn Beck, not me, that was trying to SCARE (as in "TERRORize") people into not supporting Ron Paul. All I did was expose Beck's blatant propaganda. He's a fraud. Wake up and do your homework.
This is a great video and it is appalling to see so many people on here attacking him for speaking his mind. Everything he is saying is true, all of our constitutional rights have been revoked in the past 6 years, but many people just can't fathom the fact that everything might not be what it seems. They will not realize that they are slaves until they are dragged away in chains, and perhaps not even then.
hey, I am a jperry, also....are you really a dickhead, or do you just do this sort of thing (try riding the coattails of famous people) as part of a shameless self promotion campaign to one day be meaningful yourself? I am just curious. btw, i am not at all interested in your response as this was a rhetorical question.
So you're a famous dickhead that goes by "jperry"? Gee, thanks for stopping by! I'm honored. I'm afraid you're wrong about the "shameless self promotion" thing, though. I'm here because I take my responsibility as a citizen seriously and have no problem telling it like it is. And BTW - If you weren't interested in my response you wouldn't have asked the question. Got anything relevant to say?
The first thing you need to understand is that this video is not an endorsement of Ron Paul. It's an endorsement of the peoples' right to equal exposure of ALL the presidential candidates, unencumbered by the scare-mongering propaganda of subservient corporate media lackeys like Beck. A good rule of thumb for anyone interested in real political change in America is to pay more attention to the candidates the "mainstream" media does its best to ignore, Like Paul and Kucinich.
I suppose Glenn Beck COULD be awesome, if you're into complete phonies.
The fact that 46 people have rated this video, with the average rating being four stars, completely contradicts your claim that the "CONSIDERABLE minority" like it.
Thanks for stopping by. We'll be here anytime you're ready to present an intelligent argument.
there are 303 million people in the united states of america. you have 769 views...
i assure you, the majority of americans do not agree with you. but that's really beside the point. because you disagree with beck's opinion does not make him a phony. can't you just accept it as a difference of opinion?
Looks like you need a lesson in logic. You originally said "the CONSIDERABLE minority like this video," which any reasonable person would conclude means the minority of those who have actually watched it. That's the score you're wrong on.
It's not Beck's opinion that makes him a phony. It's his propaganda. He's trying to scare people into not supporting Ron Paul by suggesting that the larger Paul's support base gets, the greater chance there is for domestic terrorism. He's an overpaid shill for a corporate media that is afraid of Paul because he represents real government for everybody, as opposed to an elitist corporatocracy that benefits only a select few.
I agree that too many candidates do not get any media attention. It's unfortunate that we have a two-party system. You talk about rights of exposure, Beck handed Ron Paul an hour of it and was fair and agreed on many things.
And went as far as saying he would french kiss him if he wasn't a guy when he agreed on taxes. Not exactly the mark of a stellar journalist. Great that he gave Paul an hour. But he only did it because the grass roots explosion of Paul's campaign is forcing the MSM to cover him. If they continued to ignore him, it would make their elitist complicity all the more obvious.
he is not. oh i guess he is cause he doesnt share every veiw what some of ron paul's followers think. then again im not either RP's follower. i wont vote for Him in any election Hes in
Agreed. Did anyone unfortunately see Ron Paul on his show yesterday? Glenn asked him the absolutely dumbest questions I have ever heard.......I guess Paul's supporters are threatening Beck's life?!? Good for them.
I caught part of it that somone posted here on YouTube. It's always easy to recognize media phonies like Beck, by the way they editorialize with their questions. Real journalists don't do that, and they don't try to scare people into not supporting a particular candidate, like he did with that Ron Paul bash fest of his that inspired my video.
HOWEVER: I do NOT support any fool who may be threatening Beck's life, nor am I attempting to encourage that type of idiocy in ANY way. That would only fulfill Beck's juvenile scare-monger prophecy. It's much more effective for the long term to let him continue to spew his blatant fraud and ignorance, which is helping to awaken more true patriots every day. He'll render himself irrelevant soon enough.
i actually do like Glenn beck and somethings He says, i do agree with. but then i just dont agree with what You say. its just my opinion. i dont know how He could be a bush tool cause he actually talks against some of what Bush's idea or what He does. But He also talks against Dems as well as rep.
He's not so much a Bush tool exclusively, but a tool for the corrupt, fascist political system that Bush and many others on both sides of the aisle in Washington represent. He was deliberately trying to scare people into not supporting Ron Paul, because Paul is a threat to the corrupt system, as is Dennis Kucinich. Which is why the "mainstream" media tries its best to ignore both of them.
So you actually prefer a completely corrupt political system, where the people are played for fools by the politics of fear, and illegal wars for profit that kill millions of innocent people and create national debt that will stretch several generations into the future are the norm?
Can't imagine why anybody with common sense wouldn't like what Ron Paul is saying, but that's your choice, I guess. How about Kucinich?
Beck has had a "this space for sale" sign on his soul for a long time. Everything for a buck. Just like all the other neo-con mouthpieces in the media.
Thanks! Not concerned with being kind to Bush broadcast media hacks who couldn't be real journalists if their life depended on it. People like Beck and Savage are not the least bit interested in keeping their audience truly informed. Their sole mission is to spread neoconservative propaganda in support of perpetual war and a submissive populace.
Thanks for sharing that link Koby - Much appreciated. I understand and have great respect for the need to follow House rules. But the rules don't prevent Ron from signing on to H. Res. 333 (Kucinich's impeachment bill for Cheney), which he has yet to do. Not only is it the right thing to do, but it could also get him a lot of support he otherwise would never have.
Ok let's not attack Glenn Beck or other people for their opinions. regardless of whether Beck's opinion is right of not, it's not fair to attack someone for exersizing the right of free speech. By the way i don't agree with anything this guy is saying but it's his right to say it.
It's actually a *response* to *Glenn Beck's* heinous attack on Ron Paul supporters. Watch his clip. He's deliberately attempting to sabotage the surging Paul campaign by scaring people into not supporting him for fear of inciting domestic terrorism. He is certainly free to say what he wants, but when your words are carried over the people's airwaves, you have a responsibility to be fully truthful and accurate, which he certainly wasn't.
I just feel that talking will not get you guys down South anywhere. Action is needed...real action, if you have any hope for change. Rigged elections, planned economic disaster, martial law a phone call away, and the absence of your constitutional rights...no health care, no education, no plans for leading the World in technology, war, war, and more war, no international friends...do you know your private banker's address?
This dude is on par with douchebag olberman!! Why are Losertarians so nuts!! You guys have some incredibly great ideas, then all of the sudden you start preaching about legalizing drugs, legalizing prostitution, pro abortion! why don't you make an honest attempt at trying to change things for the better instead of pissing and moaning that nobody listens to you.
You trolls are so easy to spot. Nothing on your YouTube channel, comments totally unrelated to the video, complete lack of anything resembling an intelligent argument. Way to go, genius! Who do you goons think you're fooling with your sophomoric crap?
oh! Zing! Why don't you people make an honest attempt at trying change things instead of complaining that no one listens to you. Legalizing drugs, pro abortion, free for all with homosexuality, etc. These things are all on your parties platform and you seriously whine that no one listens. Your party is the bastard child of the Republican/democrat parties.
Sorry to burst your angry little bubble, junior. Look at my profile. I belong to no political party and never have. Just because I support Ron Paul's right to not have his candidacy sabotaged by phony Bush media slugs like Beck doesn't mean I agree with him on everything, and in fact I don't. As far as making an honest attempt to change things goes, you need to practice what you're preaching. Got any comments relevant to this video?
not enough characters to refute the filth which you spew except for one ... you so strongly dislike the term islamo-fascist and blister those whom use the term all the while you use the term neo-con. Very little difference. You have chosen to call you're country men something derogatory like neo-con I rather enjoy calling those whom wish the destroy our country Islamo-fascists.
Typical Bushie copout. You people are proving every day that you're not interested in an honest debate based on facts. All you want to do is muddy the waters with useless arguments designed to distract from Bushco's criminal agenda. On that score, you're kickin' ass!
no no, the water is very clear... you spew filth, which happens to be unfounded. Then you get upset if kids like myself make fun of you for being a total douche bag. I've actually watched a few of your other videos on your profile... very entertaining.
Make fun of me all you want. Not a problem. I actually got a laugh out of that one, since "douche bag" is a term I used a lot when I was your age (if the age in your profile is truthfully how old you are). It's a handy (but pathetically weak) substitute for an intelligent argument.
I have no problem with true conservatives. I have a problem with people who PRETEND TO BE such people, and the blind lemmings like you who support them.
A neo-con is someone who claims to promote conservative ideals but is actually anything but conservative. "Islamo-fascist" is a completely non-sensical term made up out of thin air by neocons, designed to disguise their own fascist agenda with the face of their chosen enemy. It's nothing more than a rhetorical scare tactic. As far as those who want to destroy our country, who needs to worry about radical Islam when we have radical Bushco doing such a fine job of it themselves?
beautiful example of selective political correctness. oh the hypocrisy! Bush is a great president... actually I would vote for him again. I would love to see Dick Cheney or Carl Rove run for president... I would vote for them also...
Sorry, winston. Anyone who can read can tell that you have yet to provide a coherent argument in response to this video. You're just attacking, which is what your type does when you have no real answers. That "just try like hell to make the other guy look bad" strategy only goes so far. To make it all the way, you actually need to introduce a legitimate argument at some point. Keep trying, junior!
by the way lost my password to my old account so recently had to start a new...I'll be sure to update that so you have sufficient material for a solid background check... Thanks
Hey jperryam- I really like your video and expressed a similar comment there.
It's no accident that Beck and O'Reilly both spew thrip like Islamo-Fascist lies- It/they run in tandem with legislation!!!!
I encourage you to make an update to this video including info on Congressional Bill S. 1949 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
P.S. a big political machine runs mediamatters dot org (the clinton machine)
Thanks....Funny you should mention that bill (it's actually S.1959). I read through it and made a bunch of notes yesterday. I'm going to try to get something done on that this week. Was not aware of the Clinton connection to Media Matters. Can you email me with more details on that?
He may not be a fascist in practice, since he's not part of government (as far as we know, anyway). But he is absolutely helping to promote a fascist ideology with his thinly disguised support of the Bush administration.
Just wondering...do you see everyone who doesn't share your views as a liberal Jew-blamer? Pretty narrow vision, don't you think?
You do not like him because he is successful and rich. That is the politics of envy perpetuated by the news media and the Democratic Party. That is Bolshevik thinking comrade.
Beck can have all the money he wants. I don't dislike him because he's rich. I dislike him because he's a frontline propaganda foot soldier in Bush's fascist army. And your continued refusal to even attempt to refute that view places you squarely in his footsteps.
3 - Because he agrees with Beck and promotes lies like "Islamofascism" - a completely non-sensical, made up term designed to instill fear.
4 - George W. Bush, the "Commander-in-Chief."
Slam my rhetoric all you want (which is all you do with these questions). But your inability to refute the FACTS in my video proves you're just another Bush propaganda artist.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
1 -- Still Mr. Beck did not lick his boots, it is a lie.
2 -- video was too long to labor through it again.
3- all terms are made up and must originate somewhere.
4- you call it occupation, I call it liberation.
You want me to refute the facts in your video. What facts? It is a rhetoric laden rant void of facts. Please let me know the facts in your video so I can refute them. When you call me a "Bush propaganda artist," is that one of your facts?
Thanks for proving my assertions. You're not even willing to watch the video! In which I quote Beck and Horowitz, mention things about which they are factually wrong, list the definitions of fascism, and point out that radical Islamic terrorists seek not to control the state, but to remove western influence from their homeland. But the video contains no facts? Please. You really are a BUSH-leaguer.
So you disagree with Glenn Beck and resort to name calling. That is a play right out of the leftist handbook: "when unable to debate the facts, resort to name calling and insults." Great going comrade, your commissars will be proud of you.
I would debate the facts with Glenn Beck any day of the week and make him look like the pathetic fool he truly is. I used plenty of them in the video. He couldn't be a real journalist if his life depended on it. As far name calling goes, I stated my opinion and I stand by it. He's a worthless Bush tool. Speaking of facts, how about telling me where I'm wrong?
Your views are opinions, hence how can they be classified wrong? Unlike liberals, we conservatives do not rate opposing opinions as wrong, just a disagreement.
Read the question again. I asked you to tell me what FACTS (of which there are many in my video) I have wrong. I did not ask you about my opinions. YOU'RE the one who charged that I was unable to debate the facts. So I asked which ones I have wrong and suddenly it's all just opinion to you? Well, isn't that convenient?! Congrats on being part of the problem in America, genius.
Where did I say your video was in error? I wrote, ""when unable to debate the facts, resort to name calling and insults." Meaning you cannot debate facts, not that your facts are wrong.
Oh, so you agree with me now? What happened? Did you take your meds or something? Last time I checked, when you trash someone for name calling and say they can't debate the facts, you're implying that the person is somehow wrong. But I guess you're ironically correct on one note: I can't debate the facts with YOU, because you're avoiding them.
Got it. You disagree. Yet you admit that my facts are not wrong, and you refuse to articulate in any way whatsoever what puts me on the wrong side of the argument. That strategy might work with the Fox News Channel lemmings who view the world in 20 second sound bites and cheer when O'Reilly cuts guests' microphones because he doesn't like what they're saying, but it won't work here.
Do the video and my comments here not make it obvious enough for you? Jeezus, you cons are so tedious. One more time, Einstein: Tell me specifically what you disagree with, tell me specifically why I'm wrong, or go spew your semantic garbage somewhere else.
If he is a Bush tool then why is he vocally against Bush's stance on immigration and the border and against NAFTA superhighways. Not to mention why is he the only big name talk show host who has spent any time questioning the Campion and Ramos case? Declaring that someone is a Bush tool because they are not going to vote for Ron Paul is faulty logic. It is like saying someone must be a Mariah Carey fan because they do not like Metalica.
The point the video makes, which you either totally missed or are totally ignoring, is that Beck was trying to scare people into not supporting Paul because of some mythical
"fringe element" of Paul supporters that could resort to violence. In other words (according to Beck), "it's not safe to support ron Paul." It's pure propaganda meant to steer voters away from people like Paul and Kucinich, because they don't represent the Fascist fast track this country is on.
it never once seemed to me that beck was trying to "scare" people away from Paul. people are more independent than that anyway. they can make up their own minds and are hardly influenced by hollywood or the media.
Now you're just being intellectually dishonest. He talked about the possibility of "fringe" Paul supporters resorting to violence. He was absoultely trying to scare people away from Paul. Your claim that people are hardly influenced by Hollywood and the media is laughable. If you were right, the current administration would have been impeached, removed from office and sent to jail a long time ago.
glenn beck simply stated fact. do you care who tom cruise, chuck norris, or bruce springsteen are going to support for president? haven't you made up your own mind...like the rest of us? it is not laughable. it's fact.
Good Stuff i'm glad i came across this by typing in glen beck lies.
changapoblana 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The more Obama's operatives and lemmings demonize Beck, the more thinking Americans love Beck. It's obvious that, if they demonize Beck, Beck represents a threat to them. They help us understand that if we want to defend ourselves from Obama, his comrades, and his Marxist scams (Obamacare, cap and trade, etc.), we have to support patriots like Beck. So we SUPPORT BECK and patriots like Beck!
Antonio33s 1 year ago
god your a IDIOT!!!!!
142maj 1 year ago
@142maj God?
christianz2010 1 year ago
Wow, you are a freaking nutjob.
Supermassively 1 year ago
What can I say? I made this video 2 and-a-half years ago, when I still thought people like Beck were worth responding to. By now it's certainly clear to anyone interested in legitimate discourse that he's just a clownish distraction. But hey, since you stopped by, how about defining "Islamo-Fascist" for us?
jperryam 1 year ago
@jperryam,
I hope you're not expecting a pretentious neo-con troll-boy like Supermassively to answer your question. How could he? He spends so much time regurgitating the same idiotic and tired ass "the GWB Administration can't be wrong" propaganda! :D
archelonprime 1 year ago
Very well put indeed.
Ron Paul, Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura are the few, the proud, the true Patriots left.
Glenn Beck the shithead, Hannity without Humanity, Limbaugh the Nimrod are nothing but tools of the New World Order whether THEY or YOU know about it.
Fear and debt are their modes of control. Keeping You withing Your primate 5 sense perception in low vibration.
Get the big picture and regain Your power!
Read "Handbook for a new Paradigm" available on YT and George Green's website NOHOAX
NassimHarameinVedas 2 years ago
What is wrong with you people?
Leftist terrorist group has nothing to do with socialism or communism, it simply means any violent group that wants to make a change to their country.
Right terrorists want to bring their country back to some form of government of the past. The only reason Right terrorist are so "politically right" is because the past is filled with right wing politics rather than left wing. Left wing has become a more recent change in history.
Sshelly34213 2 years ago
Dear BoBofGH thank you for reinforcing my post.
We ARE a dumb species.
Sshelly34213 2 years ago
This video is a fear-mongering tool against the truth.
Allah666Satan 2 years ago
LOL Glenn Beck is worried about Ron Paul turning political discourse into violence? How ironic.
This cozy partisan Mr. Beck enriches himself in his ignorance of the politicians who actually DO that in the world, and projects blame he deserves onto one of the only individuals in govt who doesn't deserve it.
A self-proclaimed libertarian who supported the Patriot Act and the $850 Billion Socialist Bailout. And now that the partisan shoe is on the other foot? He's a "libertarian" again.
heymisterderp 2 years ago
ha ha ha, idiot
Successfullosity 2 years ago
Clearly. He has made and continues to make some truly idiotic comments. Like his agreement with a guest the other day that the U.S. needs to be attacked again. He's no doubt easily manipulated as well. Blow a lot of sunshine up his backside, give him his own tv show, pay him a bunch of money, and he'll gladly do your pro-war, fascist media bidding.
jperryam 2 years ago
wow, i guess someone has alot of time on their hands, how scary....so, people who disagree with you politically don't deserve to be part of our media? who's the facist?
rogerneeb 2 years ago
It's not about disagreeing politically. It's about Beck using his position in the media to scare people into not supporting Ron Paul, with his completely baseless suggestion that the increase in the number of Paul supporters also increased the threat of terrorism. It was a reckless, ignorant abuse of the peoples' airwaves, and clearly indicative of a partisan status quo agenda being pushed by Beck and the people who pay his salary. The guy is a worthless corporate media tool.
jperryam 2 years ago
Osama Bin Laden is a leftist terrorist, Bush and the neo cons are most definitely fascists.
This should be evident, of course most people don't even understand the definition of fascism....
We're a dumb species, we want to be brainwashed, we want someone to tell us what to think and what to do. I think group think is just a direct result of living in a society, in order to survive better we conform. You'll never get rid of that unfortunately.
Sshelly34213 2 years ago
Stop watching FOX news. Osama Bin Laden has nothing to do with the American left. You are a tool.
BOBofGH 2 years ago
Oh my fucking God you're a moron, he IS a leftist terrorist, learn the definition of leftist terrorist. Leftist terrorists are terrorists that are for change in a specific region, that is their idea of change. By that definition he is a leftist terrorist, a terrorist on the right would be for bringing back something from the past.
Sshelly34213 2 years ago
Beck is nuts, the minute I saw him speak I knew he was full of absolute sht.
How can people be so gullible?
Sshelly34213 2 years ago
beck is a fascist and a treasonist to america
capelipl 2 years ago
Glenn Beck supports Ron Paul now, how weird. But the government did send out a document to missouri law enforcement. Saying that people with Ron Paul bumperstickers could be domestic terrorists.
chancew44 3 years ago
You're referring to the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) report dated 02/20/09. They're also attacking supporters of Bob Barr, who was the Libertarian Party candidate for president, and Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin. It's a hopelessly transparent attempt to intimidate people into not supporting third parties and real change.
MUST READ: Chuck Baldwin's direct response to the MIAC. Go to his website and look in his archives for "My Response To MIAC Report." - Pass it on.
jperryam 3 years ago
Jerry, you are so right. I was one Ron Paul's delegates. The Christian stations (Radio) are manipulating people with shame if they vote third party. I have voted third party for the last several elections. Chuck Baldwin was the best candidate, Ron Paul endorsed him. THANKS!
coolmamac 2 years ago
Comment removed
chancew44 3 years ago
olbermanns twin ^^, srsly you could double him
random0815 3 years ago
Comment removed
Rmittelberg 3 years ago
Comment removed
Rmittelberg 3 years ago
my mom loves glenn beck... she is brainwashed tho kinda she is started to realize but she still likes him i dunno maybe glennb eck changed... but she also likes juiliani for some reason i dont get it doesnt make sense... they are all scum
xdyingfetusx69 3 years ago
LMAO. You ignorant sack of shit you don't even listen to his show and you accuse him of being a Bush cronie.
jschwind435 3 years ago
I checked out your channel to see if you could cure my ignorance, but all I found was a monster truck video and something about making a cheap high def speaker. LMAO indeed. This video was done a year ago, when I still thought people like Beck were worth responding to. I have since turned off all TV news and talking heads completely. You should try it. Do some real homework. Use the critical thinking skills you were born with. You might just learn something of value that you can share.
jperryam 3 years ago
I am shocked and privliged by your intrest and very personel comment from someone as popular as your self.
Oh wait, you're not. And the funny part is you thought I gave a shit about what you think. It sucks getting old doesn't it?
jschwind435 3 years ago
If you didn't care what I think you wouldn't have commented on the video in the first place. I'm not here for popularity. I'm here to share truth that the pathetic "mainstream" media doesn't have the cojones to deal with, and because silence is unacceptable. And trust me - when you're my age (if you're really 23 like your channel says), you won't think it's so bad. You'll realize, if you're lucky, that age is a state of mind and that being "old" is better than being dead.
jperryam 3 years ago
I'll be lucky if I die way before the nurses have to change my diaper in a shit stenched nursing home. I sure can't wait to get old! And why on earth would I have to lie about my age?
But we agree somewhere. The media and there liberal bias sucks, but I still don't need 1 of million biased bloggers to tell me what to think.
jschwind435 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Type in "Who the hell is Glenn Beck" at Google.
Keep in mind, that's an observer's opinion who isn't even in the U.S.
JRodB 3 years ago
911 was onside job i am more americans can see that dont vote ,turn off cnn and foxs news and abc
totolondon 3 years ago
No it wasn't.
You're just bored with your life, and you're looking for something to talk about.
Shut up.
JRodB 3 years ago
um.. hes actually right you are just brainwashed and scared of the truth... why dont you have some fuckin respect for people who actually know whats going on asshole!
xdyingfetusx69 3 years ago
Keep speaking the truth from your heart brother
beatbrain 3 years ago
6:58 you were going to say something else? I would have agreed with you.
Eagle0600 3 years ago
Can't say that I disagree with you now. But when I did that video five months ago, his claim that Ron Paul supporters could become terrorists was fresh, and an obvious attempt to scare people away from Dr. Paul. I realize it's hard for some to believe, but some people actually buy the garbage that people like Beck spew on a regular basis. I think sometimes it's worth it to step up and put propaganda goons like him in their place.
Thanks -
JP
jperryam 3 years ago
what does he say that is "propaganda?"
whatymcwhat 3 years ago
This video was done (in November 2007) in response to Beck's completely unsupported suggestion that it wasn't safe to support Ron Paul because some of his supporters could resort to violence. I call that propaganda. Other than that, he's just another mostly vacant talking head with nothing of real value to offer...Part of a worthless mainstream TV media that is more concerned with sensationalism and ratings than keeping the American people fully and accurately informed.
jperryam 3 years ago
"beck is a fascist tool and we're all victims of the neocon media machine!!!" 'Glenn Beck is a fearmonger?' You bet your ass he is. And for the record, if you've listened to Glenn Beck for any length of time, YOU WOULD KNOW that the tantrums Beck has thrown makes the title of this video sound like Sunday school material. To suggest otherwise is fear mongering, calling the kettle black, and just flat out lying.
saxrider 4 years ago
I've watched Glenn Beck on CNN, and I've listened to him for years. I think you over estimate your estimation, in fact I'm sure of it. Glenn Beck IS AFRAID of calling a spade a spade from time to time...especially now that he's on TV. Anyone who has listened to him for years, and I have since before 2003, know that he's capable of back peddling, hedging and giving himself an "out" just like any other celeb commentator. Glenn Beck is human and more then capable of hyperbole and overstatement.
saxrider 4 years ago
I'd say his admission that he's not legit lends credence to my view about him. Well, that and the fact that he says ridiculous things like wanting to frech kiss Ron Paul for his stance on taxes, and that people who hate America were losing their homes in the California fires last year. Doesn't take more than one or two of those juvenile gems to prove his illegitimacy. His shows are a waste of valuable media space.
jperryam 4 years ago
You're right. I didn't say that. I said my video was in response to that segment, and I gave it what I thought (and still think) was an appropriate title. Don't forget that logic and context is a two-way street.
Talk about blatant sweeping accusations! I call all who don't agree with me ignorant neocons? That's funny, I don't recall saying that about you. Whether or not Beck fits the textbook definition of fascism, he sure as hell is NOT a legitmate journalist.
jperryam 4 years ago
In that segment, yes. And I hardly see how simply pointing that out makes ME a fearmonger. But I might agree that anyone who thinks today's MSM doesn't have an extreme credibility problem is a victim. Of their own ignorance.
jperryam 4 years ago
He didn't need to call Ron Paul supporters terrorists. His obvious goal with that segment was to scare people into not supporting Paul, who represents the real change in government that the corporate media (you know, the one Beck works for?) is not interested in.
jperryam 4 years ago
My video was solely in response to Beck's fearmongering segment about how Ron Paul supporters could become terrorists. He was clearly trying to scare people into not supporting Paul. Hackery indeed. Pure propaganda. As far as Olbermann goes, I ignore the partisan crap. I look for truth and accuracy, of which there is more on his show than all those others I mentioned combined. Regardless of how you label them, they're about NOTHING but radical right spin and avoiding any and all ugly truth.
jperryam 4 years ago
lol.. wow
dvon2005 4 years ago
I love how people just throw the word fascist around. If you actually bothered to listen to more then a few minutes of his show you would know that he is not the biggest fan of Bush.
Stop getting your news from media matters. Better yet, go jump in front of a bus.
xellios83 4 years ago
Who's just throwing it around? If you can't see the march toward full blown fascism in this country, your're just another fascist tool, whether you realize it or not. Just like Beck. But his scaremongering suggests he knows exactly what he's doing.
I don't get my news from media matters. I simply mentioned it as one source people should check out. That's how people with a clue do things. They consider multiple sources and come to well reasoned conclusions. You should try it some time.
jperryam 4 years ago
what exactly makes him a fascist? The fact that he is against the idea of the nanny state? I suggest you crack open a dictionary before making baseless assumptions.
I absolutely see the march towards fascism, but it certainly isnt coming from the right.
Take the time to actually listen to his show, and then try again.
xellios 4 years ago
As I stated in another response above, this video was solely in response to the segment where Beck was purposely trying to scare people into NOT supporting Paul, by suggesting that his supporters could resort to terrorism. Granted it doesn't necessarily make him a fascist, but I saw it as pushing the fascist/corporatist agenda. Right or left, doesn't matter. It's all the same inside the Beltway. Perhaps he just saw it as politics. I don't care. I stand by my view and make no apologies for it.
jperryam 4 years ago
It's far bigger than just Bush. Doesn't matter how much Beck likes or dislikes him. You definitely need to take the blinders off.
jperryam 4 years ago
Ron Paul says that tax dollars don't sustain gov't the federal reserve does and the power to print money. I think you were wrong there somewhere around 2:35
ThatsmyYokoOno 4 years ago
Hahahah!
And if "Ron" says so - it MUST be true!
KafirAlalazoo 4 years ago
Well he's prolly right that tax dollars don't matter much. The fed makes a profit by lending. They also control interest rates and the amount of lending by adjusting rates. They also increase inflation by printing money which makes tax dollars and all dollars worth less.
ThatsmyYokoOno 4 years ago
I like you, I like your voice, I like your ideas. I have a problem though. You overused the word bootlicker. I would through in butt kiss, cock sucker, etc. The best thing we can probably do is turn off the TV.
bluedisc 4 years ago
Right on. I noticed that myself after I put the vid up. Thanks for the word suggestions ;-)
Right on with turning off the TV too. Anything that tries to represent itself as "news," anyway. I can't even watch Olbermann anymore because of that bullshit company he works for.
jperryam 4 years ago
After Reagan DEregulation and the death of the Fairness Doctrine, the NEOCONS encouraged and financed the take over of AM radio by ultra-conservative propagandists. Glenn Beck is one. Sadly it would take repeated personal confessions be leading NEOCONS to get the deceived sheeple to reverse their dedication to the fascist NEOCON deceit.
exenrontexas 4 years ago
Anyone who has a clear and open mind will applaud this man for posting this video.
Hannity & Limbaugh are anti constitution.
They are promoting socialism, and should be tried for treason.
ClarenceOlsen1 4 years ago
Was CNN also bought out by fascists?
desertjournalonline 4 years ago
Wow your a MORON! You really can not think like this.
I am not a NEO-CON I am a follower of the Constitution not Bush. I believe maybe half of what Paul says. I am a Realist, Terrorism is a real threat. I support the war in Iraq not because I support the imperialistic tendencies but its to late now. by the way
Huckabee in '08.
tripleripple89 4 years ago
I always like a good laugh early in the morning. Thanks. I will say you are right about one thing, however: Terrorism is a real threat. But the Pretender-in-Chief's illegal war of choice has only made it worse. Are you actually saying you support the war just because we're there ("too late now")? You and Huckabee deserve each other.
jperryam 4 years ago
Pretender and Chief's illegal war huh. If I may remind you he had massive support from both sides of the aisle. Secondly, I do not support the war in Iraq it was unnecessary and poorly handled. On the other hand now we are in their country should we not at least try to bring peace. Third, I disagree with the Patriot act it in the wrong hands is a dangerous weapon against liberty, I am not saying it is in the best hands now.
tripleripple89 4 years ago
People supporting something doesn't make it legal. This war is illegal and immoral. It is there country, we have no right and no obligation to protect it, and in so doing dictate to them how they should live and what kind of government they should have. If you support Huckabee, what do you like about his policies? What is his plan to avert the coming financial crisis? What is his plan for financing this needless war for the next 100 years?
n8glenn 4 years ago 2
Sure he had bipartisan support. That's because he lied to Congress (which is a felony - just one of the mountain of crimes he's guilty of) to get it. The Patriot Act is wrong no matter whose hands it's in. It was never meant to protect us. It was designed solely to subvert our constitutional rights. And peace cannot be brought by force. Iraq will NEVER be peaceful as long long as we're there.
jperryam 4 years ago
oh what Crimes is he guilty of. where is your evidence. You sound like a Sycophant "Boot Licker" "Neo Con buffoons". You sound like the idiot in the piece and remember your being compared to Bush
tripleripple89 4 years ago
warrantless spying/lying to congress/illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq (against U.S. & international law)/violation of United States law 18 U.S.C Sec. 2340A, which forbids a United States citizen from committing or conspiring to commit the offense of torture outside of the United States/willful violation of laws passed by Congress/ignoring subpoenas duly issued by Congress/ignoring the Constitution he swore to uphold...This could go on for a while. Looks like you need to do some homework.
jperryam 4 years ago
Dude.... your a terrorist
jophuf2 4 years ago
Apparently you've been watching too much radical right trash TV. You probably listen to Rush and Hannity every day too. Get a clue, junior. It was Glenn Beck, not me, that was trying to SCARE (as in "TERRORize") people into not supporting Ron Paul. All I did was expose Beck's blatant propaganda. He's a fraud. Wake up and do your homework.
jperryam 4 years ago
This is a great video and it is appalling to see so many people on here attacking him for speaking his mind. Everything he is saying is true, all of our constitutional rights have been revoked in the past 6 years, but many people just can't fathom the fact that everything might not be what it seems. They will not realize that they are slaves until they are dragged away in chains, and perhaps not even then.
n8glenn 4 years ago
hey, I am a jperry, also....are you really a dickhead, or do you just do this sort of thing (try riding the coattails of famous people) as part of a shameless self promotion campaign to one day be meaningful yourself? I am just curious. btw, i am not at all interested in your response as this was a rhetorical question.
Utard1 4 years ago
So you're a famous dickhead that goes by "jperry"? Gee, thanks for stopping by! I'm honored. I'm afraid you're wrong about the "shameless self promotion" thing, though. I'm here because I take my responsibility as a citizen seriously and have no problem telling it like it is. And BTW - If you weren't interested in my response you wouldn't have asked the question. Got anything relevant to say?
jperryam 4 years ago
when the primaries get under way and ron paul doesn't win a state... what will you do then?
ron paul supporters are great... but some are WAY over the top.
trdguy82 4 years ago
The first thing you need to understand is that this video is not an endorsement of Ron Paul. It's an endorsement of the peoples' right to equal exposure of ALL the presidential candidates, unencumbered by the scare-mongering propaganda of subservient corporate media lackeys like Beck. A good rule of thumb for anyone interested in real political change in America is to pay more attention to the candidates the "mainstream" media does its best to ignore, Like Paul and Kucinich.
jperryam 4 years ago
hahaha glenn beck is awesome. you don't know what you're talking about.
the wacko's and the CONSIDERABLE minority like this video.
trdguy82 4 years ago
I suppose Glenn Beck COULD be awesome, if you're into complete phonies.
The fact that 46 people have rated this video, with the average rating being four stars, completely contradicts your claim that the "CONSIDERABLE minority" like it.
Thanks for stopping by. We'll be here anytime you're ready to present an intelligent argument.
jperryam 4 years ago
there are 303 million people in the united states of america. you have 769 views...
i assure you, the majority of americans do not agree with you. but that's really beside the point. because you disagree with beck's opinion does not make him a phony. can't you just accept it as a difference of opinion?
trdguy82 4 years ago 2
Looks like you need a lesson in logic. You originally said "the CONSIDERABLE minority like this video," which any reasonable person would conclude means the minority of those who have actually watched it. That's the score you're wrong on.
jperryam 4 years ago
It's not Beck's opinion that makes him a phony. It's his propaganda. He's trying to scare people into not supporting Ron Paul by suggesting that the larger Paul's support base gets, the greater chance there is for domestic terrorism. He's an overpaid shill for a corporate media that is afraid of Paul because he represents real government for everybody, as opposed to an elitist corporatocracy that benefits only a select few.
jperryam 4 years ago
I agree that too many candidates do not get any media attention. It's unfortunate that we have a two-party system. You talk about rights of exposure, Beck handed Ron Paul an hour of it and was fair and agreed on many things.
trdguy82 4 years ago
And went as far as saying he would french kiss him if he wasn't a guy when he agreed on taxes. Not exactly the mark of a stellar journalist. Great that he gave Paul an hour. But he only did it because the grass roots explosion of Paul's campaign is forcing the MSM to cover him. If they continued to ignore him, it would make their elitist complicity all the more obvious.
jperryam 4 years ago
Beck is engaged in slimeball character assassination. He IS a traitor because he is engaged in anti-consitution manipulations. Mr Beck is disgusting.
STRINGMAGICK 4 years ago
he is not. oh i guess he is cause he doesnt share every veiw what some of ron paul's followers think. then again im not either RP's follower. i wont vote for Him in any election Hes in
suetrask 4 years ago
Glenn Beck is a flaming IDIOT!
MotoRooter 4 years ago
Agreed. Did anyone unfortunately see Ron Paul on his show yesterday? Glenn asked him the absolutely dumbest questions I have ever heard.......I guess Paul's supporters are threatening Beck's life?!? Good for them.
timmyblaze 4 years ago
I caught part of it that somone posted here on YouTube. It's always easy to recognize media phonies like Beck, by the way they editorialize with their questions. Real journalists don't do that, and they don't try to scare people into not supporting a particular candidate, like he did with that Ron Paul bash fest of his that inspired my video.
jperryam 4 years ago
HOWEVER: I do NOT support any fool who may be threatening Beck's life, nor am I attempting to encourage that type of idiocy in ANY way. That would only fulfill Beck's juvenile scare-monger prophecy. It's much more effective for the long term to let him continue to spew his blatant fraud and ignorance, which is helping to awaken more true patriots every day. He'll render himself irrelevant soon enough.
jperryam 4 years ago
Glenn is insecure and emotionally unstable.
DCUPtoejuice 4 years ago
i actually do like Glenn beck and somethings He says, i do agree with. but then i just dont agree with what You say. its just my opinion. i dont know how He could be a bush tool cause he actually talks against some of what Bush's idea or what He does. But He also talks against Dems as well as rep.
suetrask 4 years ago
He's not so much a Bush tool exclusively, but a tool for the corrupt, fascist political system that Bush and many others on both sides of the aisle in Washington represent. He was deliberately trying to scare people into not supporting Ron Paul, because Paul is a threat to the corrupt system, as is Dennis Kucinich. Which is why the "mainstream" media tries its best to ignore both of them.
jperryam 4 years ago
well i know im not a fan of Ron Paul but thats just what i think.
suetrask 4 years ago
So you actually prefer a completely corrupt political system, where the people are played for fools by the politics of fear, and illegal wars for profit that kill millions of innocent people and create national debt that will stretch several generations into the future are the norm?
Can't imagine why anybody with common sense wouldn't like what Ron Paul is saying, but that's your choice, I guess. How about Kucinich?
jperryam 4 years ago
no i wasnt saying i want it to be corrupt. for fact i know how it feels to worry about a family member who is in the iraq war.
i dont know enough about Kucinich to say if i like or dont like Him
suetrask 4 years ago
its okay video but wrong about glenn beck
suetrask 4 years ago
Care to expand on how you think I'm wrong about him? And how can the video be okay if it's wrong?
jperryam 4 years ago
Great video that's spot on!
hornshwangler 4 years ago
Absolutely, 100 % right on the money.
Eloquently said.
Thank you, and keep up the good work.
RON PAUL for We The People's President in 08!!
Long Live the U.S. Constitution!!!.
Impeach the Son of A Bush and his VP.
Back2WeThePeople 4 years ago
Beck has had a "this space for sale" sign on his soul for a long time. Everything for a buck. Just like all the other neo-con mouthpieces in the media.
Stepper11 4 years ago
What an eloquent response. You make Michael Savage sound like a really kind man.
Echelon86 4 years ago
Thanks! Not concerned with being kind to Bush broadcast media hacks who couldn't be real journalists if their life depended on it. People like Beck and Savage are not the least bit interested in keeping their audience truly informed. Their sole mission is to spread neoconservative propaganda in support of perpetual war and a submissive populace.
jperryam 4 years ago
Thanks for sharing that link Koby - Much appreciated. I understand and have great respect for the need to follow House rules. But the rules don't prevent Ron from signing on to H. Res. 333 (Kucinich's impeachment bill for Cheney), which he has yet to do. Not only is it the right thing to do, but it could also get him a lot of support he otherwise would never have.
jperryam 4 years ago
Ok let's not attack Glenn Beck or other people for their opinions. regardless of whether Beck's opinion is right of not, it's not fair to attack someone for exersizing the right of free speech. By the way i don't agree with anything this guy is saying but it's his right to say it.
CanadianPatriot26 4 years ago
It's actually a *response* to *Glenn Beck's* heinous attack on Ron Paul supporters. Watch his clip. He's deliberately attempting to sabotage the surging Paul campaign by scaring people into not supporting him for fear of inciting domestic terrorism. He is certainly free to say what he wants, but when your words are carried over the people's airwaves, you have a responsibility to be fully truthful and accurate, which he certainly wasn't.
jperryam 4 years ago
Since when has Journalism ever been fully Truthful? Your right tho he does have a responsibility to be truthful to his audience
CanadianPatriot26 4 years ago
I just feel that talking will not get you guys down South anywhere. Action is needed...real action, if you have any hope for change. Rigged elections, planned economic disaster, martial law a phone call away, and the absence of your constitutional rights...no health care, no education, no plans for leading the World in technology, war, war, and more war, no international friends...do you know your private banker's address?
minstral2 4 years ago
Restore our freedoms?? What freedoms have we lost?????
wintson18 4 years ago
This dude is on par with douchebag olberman!! Why are Losertarians so nuts!! You guys have some incredibly great ideas, then all of the sudden you start preaching about legalizing drugs, legalizing prostitution, pro abortion! why don't you make an honest attempt at trying to change things for the better instead of pissing and moaning that nobody listens to you.
wintson18 4 years ago
You trolls are so easy to spot. Nothing on your YouTube channel, comments totally unrelated to the video, complete lack of anything resembling an intelligent argument. Way to go, genius! Who do you goons think you're fooling with your sophomoric crap?
jperryam 4 years ago
oh! Zing! Why don't you people make an honest attempt at trying change things instead of complaining that no one listens to you. Legalizing drugs, pro abortion, free for all with homosexuality, etc. These things are all on your parties platform and you seriously whine that no one listens. Your party is the bastard child of the Republican/democrat parties.
wintson18 4 years ago
Sorry to burst your angry little bubble, junior. Look at my profile. I belong to no political party and never have. Just because I support Ron Paul's right to not have his candidacy sabotaged by phony Bush media slugs like Beck doesn't mean I agree with him on everything, and in fact I don't. As far as making an honest attempt to change things goes, you need to practice what you're preaching. Got any comments relevant to this video?
jperryam 4 years ago
not enough characters to refute the filth which you spew except for one ... you so strongly dislike the term islamo-fascist and blister those whom use the term all the while you use the term neo-con. Very little difference. You have chosen to call you're country men something derogatory like neo-con I rather enjoy calling those whom wish the destroy our country Islamo-fascists.
wintson18 4 years ago
Typical Bushie copout. You people are proving every day that you're not interested in an honest debate based on facts. All you want to do is muddy the waters with useless arguments designed to distract from Bushco's criminal agenda. On that score, you're kickin' ass!
jperryam 4 years ago
no no, the water is very clear... you spew filth, which happens to be unfounded. Then you get upset if kids like myself make fun of you for being a total douche bag. I've actually watched a few of your other videos on your profile... very entertaining.
wintson18 4 years ago
Make fun of me all you want. Not a problem. I actually got a laugh out of that one, since "douche bag" is a term I used a lot when I was your age (if the age in your profile is truthfully how old you are). It's a handy (but pathetically weak) substitute for an intelligent argument.
jperryam 4 years ago
you're great at coming up with pseudo derogatory terms for conservatives. Do you have a few more?
wintson18 4 years ago
I have no problem with true conservatives. I have a problem with people who PRETEND TO BE such people, and the blind lemmings like you who support them.
jperryam 4 years ago
A neo-con is someone who claims to promote conservative ideals but is actually anything but conservative. "Islamo-fascist" is a completely non-sensical term made up out of thin air by neocons, designed to disguise their own fascist agenda with the face of their chosen enemy. It's nothing more than a rhetorical scare tactic. As far as those who want to destroy our country, who needs to worry about radical Islam when we have radical Bushco doing such a fine job of it themselves?
jperryam 4 years ago
beautiful example of selective political correctness. oh the hypocrisy! Bush is a great president... actually I would vote for him again. I would love to see Dick Cheney or Carl Rove run for president... I would vote for them also...
wintson18 4 years ago
Sorry, winston. Anyone who can read can tell that you have yet to provide a coherent argument in response to this video. You're just attacking, which is what your type does when you have no real answers. That "just try like hell to make the other guy look bad" strategy only goes so far. To make it all the way, you actually need to introduce a legitimate argument at some point. Keep trying, junior!
jperryam 4 years ago
by the way lost my password to my old account so recently had to start a new...I'll be sure to update that so you have sufficient material for a solid background check... Thanks
wintson18 4 years ago
I think that would be called Freedom.
digndeep 4 years ago
Is that a threat? You filthy bed wetters are pathetic! Dick Cheney for President!
wintson18 4 years ago
Hey jperryam- I really like your video and expressed a similar comment there.
It's no accident that Beck and O'Reilly both spew thrip like Islamo-Fascist lies- It/they run in tandem with legislation!!!!
I encourage you to make an update to this video including info on Congressional Bill S. 1949 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
P.S. a big political machine runs mediamatters dot org (the clinton machine)
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
Thanks....Funny you should mention that bill (it's actually S.1959). I read through it and made a bunch of notes yesterday. I'm going to try to get something done on that this week. Was not aware of the Clinton connection to Media Matters. Can you email me with more details on that?
Thanks again - jp
jperryam 4 years ago
You're welcome :-) Sorry, that was a typo, yes it's S. 1559.
I'll try and find the scoop on MM.
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
Thanks for not pulling any punches, Jerr! Love the sign, it says it all.
mystykit 4 years ago
Legallize the Constitution
Ron Paul 2008
ShiekYerbooty 4 years ago 7
Right on, Sheik! Great line!
jperryam 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Glenn Beck isn't fascist. It's the liberals who are. They blame Jews for everything.
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago
He may not be a fascist in practice, since he's not part of government (as far as we know, anyway). But he is absolutely helping to promote a fascist ideology with his thinly disguised support of the Bush administration.
Just wondering...do you see everyone who doesn't share your views as a liberal Jew-blamer? Pretty narrow vision, don't you think?
jperryam 4 years ago
hello stooge,
huh? do you smell that too? what is that? smells like... hmm, coffee. Do you hear that? what is that? sounds like your alarm clock.?
in other words.....wake up and smell the coffee
ShiekYerbooty 4 years ago
bravo.. great job, man.
MonsterTri0 4 years ago 3
Hear! Hear!
You rock man!
The truth is not a commodity!!!
citizenkong 4 years ago 3
Bush couldn't define the term democracy, why do you think he could define Islamofascism. He has trouble spelling his own name, for God's sake.
dnHooligan 4 years ago
hmm funny how terrorists are popping up every where...especialy those who are not backing Bush and his backers :¬D
Oddsweb 4 years ago 4
I hadnt even memorized Glen Beck's name, but I have seen him and realized what you are saying. Glen Beck is a shit head. -Drogo *****
SCODgreenhood 4 years ago 2
CNN probably hired him to appease the Conservative's bellyaching about the "Liberal" media.*****
ParadiseEarth1 4 years ago
LOL PEarth, so much for Liberal Media! LOL You must have heard of the latest monopoly war with the FCC regarding multimedia giants...
SCODgreenhood 4 years ago 3
You do not like him because he is successful and rich. That is the politics of envy perpetuated by the news media and the Democratic Party. That is Bolshevik thinking comrade.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
Beck can have all the money he wants. I don't dislike him because he's rich. I dislike him because he's a frontline propaganda foot soldier in Bush's fascist army. And your continued refusal to even attempt to refute that view places you squarely in his footsteps.
jperryam 4 years ago
You got that right, I am a Beck follower and proud to be one. Thank you.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
You keep demanding I detail what in your video I disagree with, well here it is:
1 -- Can you tell me what boots Beck licked?
2 -- Can you explain how "Glenn Beck is a fascist Bush media tool?"
3 -- Why is David Horowitz a "dirt bag?"
4 -- Who is engaged in "illegal occupation of Iraq?"
Your rhetoric is just as inflammatory and unproven as you claim of Glenn Beck. Did you listen to your video?
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
1 - Bush's boots. It's an expression.
2 - The video explains it. Watch again.
3 - Because he agrees with Beck and promotes lies like "Islamofascism" - a completely non-sensical, made up term designed to instill fear.
4 - George W. Bush, the "Commander-in-Chief."
Slam my rhetoric all you want (which is all you do with these questions). But your inability to refute the FACTS in my video proves you're just another Bush propaganda artist.
jperryam 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1 -- Still Mr. Beck did not lick his boots, it is a lie.
2 -- video was too long to labor through it again.
3- all terms are made up and must originate somewhere.
4- you call it occupation, I call it liberation.
You want me to refute the facts in your video. What facts? It is a rhetoric laden rant void of facts. Please let me know the facts in your video so I can refute them. When you call me a "Bush propaganda artist," is that one of your facts?
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
Thanks for proving my assertions. You're not even willing to watch the video! In which I quote Beck and Horowitz, mention things about which they are factually wrong, list the definitions of fascism, and point out that radical Islamic terrorists seek not to control the state, but to remove western influence from their homeland. But the video contains no facts? Please. You really are a BUSH-leaguer.
jperryam 4 years ago
Beck goes on about Democrats being socialists. . . So why are you a follower?
citizenkong 4 years ago
Which of course proves that no amount of money can buy a clue.
jperryam 4 years ago
Show your commissar your posting, he/she will be proud of you.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
So you disagree with Glenn Beck and resort to name calling. That is a play right out of the leftist handbook: "when unable to debate the facts, resort to name calling and insults." Great going comrade, your commissars will be proud of you.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
I would debate the facts with Glenn Beck any day of the week and make him look like the pathetic fool he truly is. I used plenty of them in the video. He couldn't be a real journalist if his life depended on it. As far name calling goes, I stated my opinion and I stand by it. He's a worthless Bush tool. Speaking of facts, how about telling me where I'm wrong?
jperryam 4 years ago
Your views are opinions, hence how can they be classified wrong? Unlike liberals, we conservatives do not rate opposing opinions as wrong, just a disagreement.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
Read the question again. I asked you to tell me what FACTS (of which there are many in my video) I have wrong. I did not ask you about my opinions. YOU'RE the one who charged that I was unable to debate the facts. So I asked which ones I have wrong and suddenly it's all just opinion to you? Well, isn't that convenient?! Congrats on being part of the problem in America, genius.
jperryam 4 years ago
Where did I say your video was in error? I wrote, ""when unable to debate the facts, resort to name calling and insults." Meaning you cannot debate facts, not that your facts are wrong.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
Oh, so you agree with me now? What happened? Did you take your meds or something? Last time I checked, when you trash someone for name calling and say they can't debate the facts, you're implying that the person is somehow wrong. But I guess you're ironically correct on one note: I can't debate the facts with YOU, because you're avoiding them.
jperryam 4 years ago
I never said I agree with you. Lord help me if I ever do.
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
Got it. You disagree. Yet you admit that my facts are not wrong, and you refuse to articulate in any way whatsoever what puts me on the wrong side of the argument. That strategy might work with the Fox News Channel lemmings who view the world in 20 second sound bites and cheer when O'Reilly cuts guests' microphones because he doesn't like what they're saying, but it won't work here.
jperryam 4 years ago
What are you attempting to get me to agree with?
HearTheTruth 4 years ago
Do the video and my comments here not make it obvious enough for you? Jeezus, you cons are so tedious. One more time, Einstein: Tell me specifically what you disagree with, tell me specifically why I'm wrong, or go spew your semantic garbage somewhere else.
jperryam 4 years ago
If he is a Bush tool then why is he vocally against Bush's stance on immigration and the border and against NAFTA superhighways. Not to mention why is he the only big name talk show host who has spent any time questioning the Campion and Ramos case? Declaring that someone is a Bush tool because they are not going to vote for Ron Paul is faulty logic. It is like saying someone must be a Mariah Carey fan because they do not like Metalica.
88wildcat 4 years ago
The point the video makes, which you either totally missed or are totally ignoring, is that Beck was trying to scare people into not supporting Paul because of some mythical
"fringe element" of Paul supporters that could resort to violence. In other words (according to Beck), "it's not safe to support ron Paul." It's pure propaganda meant to steer voters away from people like Paul and Kucinich, because they don't represent the Fascist fast track this country is on.
jperryam 4 years ago
it never once seemed to me that beck was trying to "scare" people away from Paul. people are more independent than that anyway. they can make up their own minds and are hardly influenced by hollywood or the media.
trdguy82 4 years ago
Now you're just being intellectually dishonest. He talked about the possibility of "fringe" Paul supporters resorting to violence. He was absoultely trying to scare people away from Paul. Your claim that people are hardly influenced by Hollywood and the media is laughable. If you were right, the current administration would have been impeached, removed from office and sent to jail a long time ago.
jperryam 4 years ago
glenn beck simply stated fact. do you care who tom cruise, chuck norris, or bruce springsteen are going to support for president? haven't you made up your own mind...like the rest of us? it is not laughable. it's fact.
trdguy82 4 years ago