This demonstration is pretty old: Gnome shell works now a little bit diferrent (has left side Doc, different windows tiling and you can see only one workspace. Other news Ubuntu would not use G shell as main shell. Instead custom Unity interface took place.
I was thinking the same thing. Why don't they simply reuse NEPOMUK libraries, or at least make Zeitgeist and NEPOMUK compatible? If you have watched the KDE4 demos recently, you'll be noting that everything shown here is made with two lines of SPARQL queries in KDE 4.4.
However, what we do is different from NEPOMUK in that what Zeitgeist tracks is not files, but *events*, so you can get information like: during Christmas I opened that file 20 times with a set of different programs, a particular day I added a couple tags to it and another day I send it to a friend; this information is then complemented with the data stored in Tracker/Soprano.
@nnutter In Gnome Shell you find more things: folders, running programs/windows, launcher, desktops on one instead of multiple places and as a sideeffect the desktop is less cluttered when the activities-view is not active.
I think it's different but not harder to use than the current gnome. You have to get used to it. Also it breaks compatibility with for example compiz but it's extensible with javascript and css. live . gnome . org / GnomeShell / Design / Principles
This demonstration is pretty old: Gnome shell works now a little bit diferrent (has left side Doc, different windows tiling and you can see only one workspace. Other news Ubuntu would not use G shell as main shell. Instead custom Unity interface took place.
chronius9 1 year ago
This is kinda like Nepomuk, then...
Thesupermadman 2 years ago
I was thinking the same thing. Why don't they simply reuse NEPOMUK libraries, or at least make Zeitgeist and NEPOMUK compatible? If you have watched the KDE4 demos recently, you'll be noting that everything shown here is made with two lines of SPARQL queries in KDE 4.4.
alejandronova 2 years ago
In Zeitgeist 0.3 we are now using the NEPOMUK ontology where applicable and stuff like tags are entirely left for Tracker/Soprano.
RainCT 2 years ago
However, what we do is different from NEPOMUK in that what Zeitgeist tracks is not files, but *events*, so you can get information like: during Christmas I opened that file 20 times with a set of different programs, a particular day I added a couple tags to it and another day I send it to a friend; this information is then complemented with the data stored in Tracker/Soprano.
RainCT 2 years ago
That's great news. That means that GNOME metainformation will be compatible with KDE. I'll be keeping an eye on this.
alejandronova 2 years ago
this is really cool kde4 will have a run for its money :) great job five stars for me cheers
daymeion24 2 years ago 4
Awesomeness! "Thank you Siegfrieg!"
mmxgn 2 years ago
I still don't "get" Gnome Shell.
nnutter 2 years ago
@nnutter In Gnome Shell you find more things: folders, running programs/windows, launcher, desktops on one instead of multiple places and as a sideeffect the desktop is less cluttered when the activities-view is not active.
I think it's different but not harder to use than the current gnome. You have to get used to it. Also it breaks compatibility with for example compiz but it's extensible with javascript and css. live . gnome . org / GnomeShell / Design / Principles
wqtpuu 1 year ago
That's amazing, Thank you , this is awesome, great work!
wiflye81 2 years ago
Great work.
medeshago 2 years ago
Ets el millor! Jo de gran vull ser com tu :P
Només tinc ganes de
redoxkun 2 years ago
Nice work!
Also very nice to see Terminator being used :D
cmsj 2 years ago
Super Wow!!!!!!
nzMM 2 years ago
The last part really made my day. That's going to be great for end users :)
MrPicklesworth 2 years ago
that was a little above my knowledge level. not good with tech...
nuss86 2 years ago
wow, bravo
maykamal 2 years ago
Awesome, good job.
shanepatrickfagan 2 years ago