Added: 5 months ago
From: MidweekPolitics
Views: 2,681
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (166)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the border issue is ultimately not about race. It's about whether or not nation states have the right to control their own borders. i suspect you know this. what is so galling is your dishonesty. as far as the tea party goes, i support smaller government and responsible government spending and i can assure you that i am no extremist.

  • Wow I must be a racist seeing I voted for ron Paul...this video is a joke

  • Tea party = KKK Without the hoods

  • David Duke also supports the OWS, this channel is obviously used as a stage to spew dimwitted and retarded leftaliban dribble, I could immediately tell from the shitty modern pop rock song that this was going to be more "politically correct" bullshit. And what is so immoral about protecting borders from illegal immigrants? I'm all for people immigrating if they get in the LEGAL way.

  • Love how these guys equate putting troops on our borders with hating Mexican-Americans. I guess the whole illegal immigration thing is way above their heads.

  • SPIN!...David Byrd was a KKK grand master..btw, he was a Democrat. David Duke supports OWS...and the Tea Party. 2 noble causes. You guys are a bunch of tools. Seriously. Condescending dim wits. Wake up son! Infowar.com!!

  • India has invaded America through the front door as Whites are blinded by hatred for Blacks and Mex. Research for yourself !!!

  • @starofsatan666 Well OWS attracted a whole lot of Zionist Jews. They even had their own shelters that were Jew only, so you have a point there Rephan Man :^)

  • AH OH, I hate all non-white races and I hate all other religions except mine, and I like this show. Hence, this show is racist! You sir are a racist as I a racist like your show! I love this logic.

  • "A strong percentage of white people voted against Barack Obama"

    There are so many things wrong with that statement, lol. But HOW WOULD DUKE KNOW? Seriously, HOW WOULD HE KNOW? Another lying conman.

  • This video is spin -

  • @NewUser21111 why can't you be proud? Depends what your proud of tho! If you are proud of holding people back and not letting them have rights then that's a diff story.

  • David Duke is a WHITE NATIONALIST and is no longer in the KKK. Its been like 20 or 30 years. fuck you Pakman

  • I'm not saying all teabaggers are racist but racists are most likely teabaggers

  • David Duke 2012. Fuck Zionist communist scum like David Pakman and his legion of libtard followers.

  • @viletree Sieg heil kamerade! What a douche!

  • @NewUser21111 We already have our rights so why do we need a civil rights organization? who is discriminating against white people and we do have our own channel! It is called CMT! Also white people do have college fraternities. The ones that hate other people just because skin color or religion also have their own group. its called the ku klux klan.

  • Hey David Duke! Who you gonna vote for? Herman Cain or Barack Obama! Hahahahahaha!! This is Priceless!

  • Just to break up the monotony of the comments...

    ITS PENUT BUTTER JELLY TIME,PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!

    XD

  • I love this video cause I'm a fan of both David Duke and David Pakman!!!!

  • @maconsumner Your a fucking moron. Van Jones said "I admit, I was swaggered into communism when I was in my early twenties, It sounded interesting, and seemed like could solve alot of the problems in our nation. However, the movement did not fufill what it promised, and I grew out of it with a month".

    Before you make shit up, actually read. Fucking clown

  • @maconsumner Name them. Name ALL of these "Affiliations" inbred piece of shit. Comon, lets see what comes up =)

  • @maconsumner No come back to what we are talking about. you said "The Obama administration has several know Marxists within the ranks that Obama himself hired. One notable that he fired was Van Jones".

    Ok go chief, lets see what you have.

  • @maconsumner OH yeh btw? Where were you when Bush was in power? His family did business with NAZIS. I didnt see you posting up and down about "conservatives"? Nope, because your a moron, and have no clue what your talking about. Stay small kid

  • @maconsumner To connect David Duke's vicious ideals with those of Marxism is a crude, intellectually dishonest thing to do.

    You obviously know nothing about Marxism. So kindly refrain from writing ignorant things about it.

  • @maconsumner Your "absolute" knowledge is non-existent.

    Marxism is an economic system, not a "stateist (sic) form of government."

    Your "20 year sin the military dealing with 'them' directly," was a waste of taxpayer money, as you've actually dealt with your own prejudices and ignorance.

    Calling people "son" to demean them further exhibits your need to feel superior to people who surpass you in intellectual ability. Kindly accept your own shortcomings and cease your nonsense.

  • @maconsumner A. We are not friends; I don't have homophobic friends (Anne COulter video [former] comment).

    B. I was not "defending" anything; merely pointing out your ignorance. So I will not "have" to give examples to you.

    C. Your ignorance extends to YouTube protocols. "Comment removed" would indicate midweekpolitics deleting your postings. "Too many negative votes" indicates widespread disapprobation of your offensive comments. SO, I do not "have" to excuse you, and I won't!

  • @maconsumner Oops, your crazy is showing. You're criticizing "homophobic" as a made-up word? That's rich, coming from someone who claims to have been in the military, with its manufactured terminology and acronyms.

    "Grow a sense of humor." Hating someone because of their sexual orientation is not funny.

    Once again, you try to demean me by attacking my putative youthfulness; my "Professor" is me. I have made my own assessment of the world, and not by swallowing the twisted views of Coulter.

  • @maconsumner Part 1: Oh, there's crazy aplenty! The "homo" is a shorthand way of saying "homosexual"; not surprising you don't know that. Such shorthand is used in many terms.

    And, you think you're viewed as a "sexual target" by every gay man who encounters you!? Typical macho, he-man nonsense. Your use of the term, "target" exposes your anti-gay bias, and your phobia.

  • @polemius01 Sorry, not the case, I am not anti homosexual, I am pro behaving yourself correctly in public. Everyone has the right to make their own decisions on the topic of sexuality and should keep what they do their own business as a personal private matter. I understand that the word homo has been used to describe homosexuals, I am simply saying that the terms are not mutually exclusive.

  • @maconsumner Sexuality is not a "decision." "Behaving yourself correctly in public" is your subjectivity. The more you deny your homophobia, the more you affirm it.

    Your obsession about the term, "homophobia," also proclaims loud and clear that you're suffering from that particular malady.

  • @polemius01 Malady? A made up word to describe people with a position you disagree with is now a malady? Perhaps you should go to the social security administration to have it declared a disability.

    "Sexuality is not a decision" You no more have the ability to prove that it isn't than I do that it is. This discussion is having less and less point with your every emotion filled, fact deficient post. All we are talking about is opinions that cannot be varified.

  • @maconsumner Part 1: Interesting, the term "malady" sends you immediately into thoughts of defrauding the federal government. That says a lot about you. No, homophobia is an emotional malady, much like a dependent personality, or the racism, like that of your fellow Tea Bagger enthusiast, David Duke.

    Once again, the "homosexuality is a choice" con. No one is given a choice about their sexuality. To declare otherwise is to lie to yourself.

  • @maconsumner Part 2: And, your condescending "acceptance" of those lgbtq persons who behave within "social norms" that are nothing more than a narrow-minded expression of your comfort zone, is insulting in the extreme.

    An out, open, proud gay man has more courage than a hundred military men 9and, ten of them are gay!).

    Kindly crawl back into your cave. You are not well-enough developed emotionally, socially or intellectually to associate with the rest of sophisticated humanity.

  • @maconsumner I have no idea whatsoever what you "do." Reading "everything" you have said on YouTube would be a waste of my time and certainly not edifying. There seems to be a bit of paranoia going on here; if your comments are being "deleted," then you need to look to the comments themselves and not to me.

    You haven' the faintest idea of how I live my life. One thing is for sure, not being into exploitation, I do not employ people, but I certainly do pay taxes.

    You remain clueless.

  • @polemius01 "Not being into exploitation, I do not employ people"

    Doesn't that tell all. Employment is not explanation, when the terms are fair, as they are with my people, it's mutually beneficial. I am sure that the people who depend on my business for a living would not consider me clueless.

  • @maconsumner Sorry, I meant exploitation when I wrote explanation.

  • @maconsumner Exploitation of the worker is not "mutually beneficial." "The people who depend on my business for a living" says it all. Your patriarchal approach to other people is sickening. The world of business, the very people who got us into this economic mess we are in today, are YOUR people. You are one of them, feeding off the blood and sweat of the Worker while jobs disappear and the rich get richer.

    1% of the people controls 80% of the wealth. And you're okay with that! Sickening!

  • @polemius01 You didn't step back far enough to see the basis of the problem. Read the CRA of 1977 and regulatory changes as far as the lending and cash flow crisis goes. Look at the Trade treaties that previous presidents have signed to see where the jobs went and why they left. When NAFTA was signed, that sucking sound you heard was the manufacturing base of our economy leaving. It was NOT business that caused the problem. Sorry to burst your ignorant bubble,

  • @maconsumner Corporate greed and control of the US government was indeed the source of the problem. Any bubbles bursting are your, not mine.

    A stale quotation from Perot (uncited) doesn't cut it. Businesses that have used NAFTA and the regulatory changes that came under Reagan (now I've done it, taken the Lord's name in vain) have turned capitalism into a giant vampire bat. Their huge private donations to politicians have cemented the corruption into place. And, you're still okay with that.

  • @polemius01 You almost certainly haven;t noticed this, but any talk of Capitalism involves the compliticty of the US government, as it has in my (and your ) postings. Yet, I have shared the joys of Marxist ideology without the slightest reference to government interference.

    Thus, your original comment about Marxism, made from an illusory place of "authority" that exists only in your mind, is shown for the fantasy that it is.

  • Exploitation of the worker is not "mutually beneficial."

    I agree, that's why they are compensated at above market level in my area and have health care benefits and profit share. This allows me to attract and keep the best people out there. These are good people with families to support and take their responsibility to them seriously. I am 100% sure that they don't feel exploited anymore than I feel that I am exploiting them.

  • @maconsumner Your Workers are "compensated" for their labor, to produce what YOU own.

    And (yawn), the usual, "these are good people," which somehow makes you feel better for exploiting them. Their goodness is immaterial to you, as long as they continue to work.

    "100% sure" is semantic and epistemological nonsense.

    Unless a laborer owns what s/he produces, that laborer is being exploited. Equal ownership of the means of production by all workers is the only way that exploitation will cease.

  • @polemius01 Our views of life and vision of what is good and what is bad are diametrically opposed. You like most socialists seem to be incapable of seeing the difference between capitalism and criminal behavior. You have a very sad and defeated attitude about life and it shows in your posts. I no longer care to have this conversation with you and at this point truly pity you and your "I am a victim" mentality. It is sad that you are so jaded.

  • @maconsumner Many errors of fact and much subjectivity in your post:

    1. I made no reference to "criminal behavior" in my posts. Your reference to it perhaps indicates a guilty conscience.

    2. There is no evidence of a "sad and defeated attitude" in my posts, instead, there is sharp criticism of unregulated capitalism, which is viewed with almost religious fervor by its adherents.

    3. No "victim mentality," just human reason.

    4. In reality, you're the victim of your own greed and irrationality.

  • @polemius01 You are a very silly person, I thought this conversation was over. You and I will likely agree on nothing and never be able to persuade the other to their way of thinking. This is pointless, have a nice day.

  • @maconsumner "I thought this conversation was over" Why? Because you said so? Jeez, you are so stuck in your sense of heterosexual male entitlement that you expect everyone to bow to a situation because you say, "It's over." How ridiculous.

    Get a clue.

  • stop drinking the wikikoolade, dumbasses!!

  • What music is that?

  • It terrifies me that people like this still exist.

  • I'm a White Supremeist. I'm a huge fan of Diana Ross and Mary Wilson.

  • David Duke's logic is flawed. Black historically vote Democratic overwhelmingly! If the 2008 Democratic Party Presidential Nominee would have been Hillary Clinton, blacks would have voted for her at a clip of 99%!

  • I allways thought they were open about that, Tea party is the political wing of the KKK.

  • Okay, I would assume that if you are a democrat, you are considered a democrat which most black are you are. I don't think Allen West or Michael Steele voted for Obama.

    If you vote republican you are most likely a republican.

    So logically if you vote for an anti-Semitic racist then you are probably one too!

  • He has to say "non-Jewish" because the people he's talking to aren't literate enough to understand the word "gentile." That would involve some sort of understanding of social relativism.

    Honestly there's nothing to fear anymore. This is the end of the machine. We're storming the Bastille, and they can't stop it.

  • Comment removed

  • In other news, grass is green...

  • @GenerationXeroFilms Did you see where Chavez and Castro and Ahmedinijad and Putin and Medvedev have all endorsed Obama? That is a good topic if someone would just do it.

  • Louis said the astroturf groups who built the teaparty "probably want nothing to do with this." I think what he's missing is that racism is how the teaparty was built, it just has to be the "right kind" of racism that masks itself as concern about "black on white" racism whatever the fuck that means.

  • No big surprises here !

  • Okay...

    I hear "david pakman" about a thousand times the first few seconds...

    I'll keep the hell away from david pakman then, as he's clearly a dick, if he tries that hard to cement his name using tactics worthy of an infomercial.

  • @ZarlanTheGreen yeah good point, he pushes subscription every 5 minutes.

  • @NoCommentChick Right! He should get funded by corporations, the old fashioned way. That way we could have even more fair and balanced voices in media. Good thinking.

  • Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind.

    Albert Einstein

  • Duke is a parasite. And of course the Tea Party is racist. Both are deluded with their ideology.

  • Pamela Gella vs David Duke would be an epic lulzfest.

  • So what? Hitler endorsed Gun Control, Vegetarianism, and medical payments to sufferers of asbestos-caused cancers.

    Does this mean that all advocates for Gun Control, Vegetarianism and Medicare are fascists? Ok. Maybe it does. Never mind.

  • @BloodofPatriots Yawn, a hitler comparison atleast try a little creativity when spouting whatever fox or rush told you to.

  • @pandasftuw Don't watch fox or listen to rush. I bet you do though. And it's not a Hitler comparison, you idiot. Using a David Duke endorsement to vilify the Tea Party or a Hitler endorsement to vilify gun control are both examples of the same rhetorical fallacy. Do a little research first, dipshit.

  • @BloodofPatriots Well then you would lose that bet.

    I comprehended the fallacy part but you used it to take a dig at leftist pollicies by comparing them to hitlers.

    Is that honestly the best you could come up with? Weak.

  • @pandasftuw You didn't see the fallacy at all, liar. I had to point it out to you.

  • @BloodofPatriots Ofcourse I did it was evident what you trying to point out but then you committed the exact same fallacy by saying that because hitler endorsed things any other endorser of those things is a facist.

  • @pandasftuw I didn't commit any fallacy; I pointed it out. Yes, dipshit, I can correctly use a semicolon, too. Can you? I doubt it. Gun Control, Vegetarianism, and Medicare are no more facist because Hitler endorsed them than the Tea Party is racist because David Duke endorses it. If I really wanted to point out the evils of Leftist policies, I would have used the Left's darlings, Stalin and Mao. Between them, they killed so many people they made Hilter look like an amateur.

  • @BloodofPatriots You state hitlers endorses things then ask: "Does this mean" Meaning does HITLERS ENDORSEMENT mean they are facist and you proceed to answer: "It does" Commiting a the same fallacy. Also congrats on using a semicolon hun GOLD STAR 4 U . Left, left-wing and leftist generally refer to support for an egalitarian society. Don't remember Stalin, Mao or Hitler doing that but perhaps that's because I didn't get my history lessons in texas.

  • Marmiteman4 sucks this guys dick.

  • Well I think it's like The Simpsons said about Fox News. "Not racist, but #1 with racists". Maybe the Tea Party isn't explicitly racist, but the policies they want to implement would definitely enable racism, which David Duke knows.

  • @AmysFantasies What's more racist than affirmative action: The government policy of using race to fill jobs or student slots? 

  • @BloodofPatriots How can you even ask that question WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Erm how about the vast ammount of racism that happened in the work place BEFORE affirmative action you annoylingly stupid scumbag. Whats more racist then giving people of all races a fair playing field? The question is nonsensical as there is nothing racist about it. equality for blacks is racism against white equality for gays is discrimation against straights, No one takes this seriously you fool

  • @pandasftuw All affirmative action does is set a black or hispanic up for failure when he or she can't do the job. You don't cure racism with racism. You cure it the way MLK said to cure it, "When your white roommate goes to sleep, you burn the midnight oil and study more." Hard work cures racism and class inequality. Look at Asians in the US. They were horribly discriminated against, it was even illegal for some Asians to marry white women. Today, they have the highest median household income.

  • @BloodofPatriots Please seek medical advise immediately

    shocker someone with a name like bloodofpatriots is a racist, never saw that one coming

    AA counters the effects of a historical of discrimination and no people don't get jobs if they don't have the QUALIFACTIONS requested. Please come back to reality.

  • @pandasftuw Your nick paints you as a molester of pandas, so I guess that means you suck panda dick, right? Idiot. The source of my nick comes from a famous quote from Thomas Jefferson; I'm not surprised you're ignorant of it.

  • @BloodofPatriots the fact you take support of wildlife as sexual speaks for itself.

    Exactly it is the same quote used by the nut job who threatened obama with a semiautomatic.

    Also don't attempt to act moral or superior when quoting a slave owner.

    Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.

    George Washington

  • @pandasftuw Again, you miss the point. How do you go through life so clueless? Now I know you're a damn pussy. Only pussies use words like "semiautomatic" to try and instill fear. The most deadly small arms is not a semiautomatic rifle or pistol. It's a no-fail pump shotgun, used by the US military since WWI. It was so effective the Germans filed an official protest over its use against them. If you see the author of the Declaration of Independence as just a "slave owner," then fuck you.

  • @BloodofPatriots Our country is founded on a sham: our forefathers were slave-owning rich white guys who wanted it their way. So when I see the American flag, I go, 'Oh my God, you're insulting me.' That you can have a gay parade on Christopher Street in New York, with naked men and women on a float cheering, 'We're here, we're queer!' -- that's what makes my heart swell. Not the flag, but a gay naked man or woman burning the flag. I get choked up with pride

  • @pandasftuw Our Forefathers were men of conscience that stood up to the most powerful military force on the planet and won. They created a republic based on the nation of natural law, that people have a right to self-determination. Right of Free Speech, Freedom of Assembly, Right to Speedy Trial, Prohibition of Unwarranted Searches and Right of Habeas Corpus are their legacy. And yes, because of them, you can fellate your boyfriend at a Christopher Street parade, you disgusting scumbag.

  • @BloodofPatriots Lol being homophobic to people who are not even gay is really indicative of your intellect.

    Also I fail to see how any of that changes the fact they owned black people as SLAVES.the inconsistency between his well-documented belief in individual liberty and his status as a slave owner is undeniable. I guess because I'm not racist I must be black too, right?they denied women, the poor and racial minorities equal citizenship and financed the massacre of the Native Americans

  • @pandasftuw You know who sold those black slaves to white people like Jefferson and Washington? Other black people, you idiot. Do you think European slave traders would dare going into the interior of Africa? Hell, no. They would put payment on the shore and when it was enough, black africans would put other black africans they'd captured as slaves on the beach. The greatness of our Founding Fathers is proved by the fact there are women and minorities at the highest levels of government today.

  • @BloodofPatriots Why am I an idiot because you ask a question and just presume I don't know the answer lol. So the fact the founding fathers denied women, the poor and racial minorities equal citizenship and financed the massacre of the Native Americans was all a master plan for an egalitarian society? Show me that in writing please. Be a blind patriotic slut all you want but there's no flag big enough to cover up the killing of innocent people. And NO president or government has been perfect

  • @pandasftuw Because you prove your ignorance by trying to use African slavery to condemn our Forefathers when the blame rests with other Africans that sold them into slavery. The Founding Fathers put in place a system that would one day welcome not just taxpaying landowners as voters, but also "minorities" and women. Their genus is proven today with a black man in the White House, on the US Supreme Court, and a two women Secretaries of State in the last 12 years. Perfect? No. Brilliant? Yes.

  • @BloodofPatriots Because they forced them to buy slaves? Lol you just get more and more idiotic don't you. I condemned nobody just pointed out they are not gods and you need to be a critical thinker actually just an honest thinker would do. No because slavery was TAKEN out of the what THEY wrote a black man in the white house is by no means there because of the founding fathers. How warped can your mind be to believe such nonsense.

  • @pandasftuw Never did I write the Founding Fathers were gods. Only America-haters come up with that bullshit. I do know they risked everything -- yes, even their land and slaves -- for the right of self-determination. The Founding Fathers created a document that has a peaceful process allowing for amendments. Do you know how many times the Constitution has been amended? I do. You hate America too much to even learn it. Sad.

  • @BloodofPatriots 27. I like many parts of it and the founding fathers ideology but AGAIN I do not worship slave owners. I hate america because I state the truth? lol. YOU my dear are the reason people hate American's. You are a nationlist scumbag who was evidently lured here via the penial excitment you recieved from david dukes name.

  • @pandasftuw Who worships them? I admire them for the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, creating our Republic. You hate America because you see the Founding Fathers as "slave owners." Not all of them even owned slaves, you idiot. John Adams wrote the Massachusetts Constitution that banned slavery in the state. His son, John Quincy Adams, was so severe in his hatred of slavery, slave owners detested him. If you learned about ALL of the Founding Fathers, you wouldn't be such a cunt.

  • @BloodofPatriots I never stated they ALL owned slaves this was about jefferson. And I don't "see" him as a slave owner he WAS a slave owner. Also I've already stated "I like many parts of it and the founding fathers ideology". But yet I hate america because I ACCEPT the truth =] Whatever you need to tell yourself hun =]

  • @BloodofPatriots I refuse to talk to an irrational and illogical racist who worships false gods and doesn't have the ability to be a critical or honest thinker. Continue trying to convince yourself you're a libertarian and not just another neocon racist who recieves vast ammounts of penile excitement from slave owners and kkk members. Racists have no logic, you have no interest in the truth and I genuinely pity you because oppressors never will win society always progresses.

  • @pandasftuw Run away, little coward. What's all your projection about penile excitement? Me thinks you doth protest too much, bitch.

  • @BloodofPatriots Your not doing yourself a favor when you say "genus". By the way, the a good portion of the founding fathers did want slavery. Just because they were smart men doesnt mean they were perfect. Get over yourself faggot.

  • @awsumpossum1 Nor are you when you claim I "said" anything; this is a text-based forum so I either wrote it or posted it. I never said they were perfect, just brilliant. Keep your latent homosexuality and inability to use commas to yourself, idiot.

  • @BloodofPatriots Haha, you fail so hard.

  • @BloodofPatriots So the Africans sailed over here and forced whites to buy slaves from them? I actually blame the hypocritical Europeans who banned slavery in their own country but permitted it in their New World colonies

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 Don't blame just the Europeans, but also the Arabs, as well for profiting from the slave trade. But the source of the slaves were victorious African tribes that sold the losers to those Arabs and Europeans to be slaves. Europeans and Arabs were terrified to go deep into the jungle. Most of the time, they just put treasure on the beach and when it was enough, Africans would leave their African slaves on the beach for pick-up.

  • @pandasftuw And to blast a leftist too: Not all the founding fathers owned slaves, as well as slavery existed b4 when we were just a colony. The ideas behind the founding of the USA were inimical to slavery. Hence slavery was called the "fatal compromise". They permitted slavery as a compromise so we could achieve independence. After all the British were okay with slavery.

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 The Brits were okay with slavery until other countries made more money from it than they did. They sure didn't rush to end slavery for the Caribbean sugar plantations, did they? Slaves died so fast there they didn't even bother to feed them. 3 out of every 5 slaves sold to the New World did NOT end up in British North America (what would eventually become the US). Most Europeans don't know that little tidbit of information.

  • @BloodofPatriots Well most of the slaves ended up on the Caribbean islands, which for the most part were just big plantations like Jamaica, Aruba, Cuba or Haiti

  • @DawnOfTheDead991 they didn't permit they PARTOOK Nope there was no compromise they wanted slavery and never did I state they all owned slaves the convo which is not yours btw was to do with jefferson

    .Wipe the founding fathers cum off your lips get up off your knees and get some self respect and learn to be a critical thinker not a sad zombie who worships slave owners as if they had no flaws

  • @pandasftuw I don't worship the founding fathers, they aren't some deities like some of these teabag fundies think they are. But the whole US concept was inimical to slavery. At worst, they were hypocritical.

  • The funniest thing is watching an interview with a tea pary member. They are such idiots

  • @jonescbclothing You haven't see the Occupy Wall Street interviews yet. Priceless.

  • he also endorses ron paul...who knew that??

  • Why is it the people who pretend to be most proud of being white are the very same people the rest of us white folk are least proud of?

  • The Tea Party is racist... okay, what else is new?

  • @historicalogicalness I've only attended a few TEA party demonstrations in California and in Nevada. I haven't seen any racism there at all. Where have you seen racism at a TEA party? If you don't answer I i will understand. It will be because A. You've never been to a TEA party. B. You've seen a video about racism at a TEA party (I'd like to see that too) C. You're just lying your ass off as usual.

  • louis is such a downer... 

  • Look at what polls of the Tea Party shows their members believe and the general atmosphere of the party. Is it a surprise that a white supremacist endorses the movement? The Birther movement which is a sub-current of the Tea Party has a lot of obvious racists and xenophobes. So does the "Schooler" movement and the "Racism is dead except for 'Reverse Racism'" crowd.

  • Who ever is NOT surprised by this endorsement, raise your hand.

  • @46619TAB *raises hand* i think... you are very confusing, so i'm going to nod and agree with everything you say, you got my vote!

  • david duke endorsed them long ago, silly obamawhore go and promote homosexuality or something . this is old news that u are bringing up to protect ur sugar daddy obama who is low in the polls

  • Comment removed

  • David Duke being a White supremacist aside, that hair of his is an atrocity.

  • Get ready to be bombarded by hate-filled comments and death threats from the David Duke fanatics droning on about Jews secretly and maliciously controlling the world and being the source of all our problems. And if you attempt to reason with them, they'll call you "sheeple" and tell you to "keep drinking the Kool-Aid."

  • @PompousPreacher david duke is right. america is not a democracy , america is run by corporations and the media who censor and expose(only expose when politician threatens establishement) scandals of politicians they dont like or loose control of

    just today in california, obama has began going after pot growers, why ? because from next year Corporations will grow pot on industrial scale.the lobbyist pull obamas string to protect big business

    and all the corporations ,the fed are run by jews

  • lol david dukkke

  • duke is a coward. he has bots or hired people block people who post negative comments

  • @Zachdudeio2 ur confuse him with obamabots, u are retards, obama could wipe out social security bomb every country in the world, and u retards with still say oh but he is not george bush he is JEsus

  • @harj2009 Why the fuck would 'Obamabots' block me on David Duke's Youtube? And by the way, FUCK Obama

  • Most White Supremacists end up on death row. In the words of American History X's Daniel Vineyard, "Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." TRUE STORY.

  • Perfect! Let them endorse the tea baggers, it'll help bring down their public image!

  • lol NOW now David, I really enjoy your radio program. You are also a friend of my channel. I am laughing while I am typing this..but are you just stirring shit with the title? After all David Duke proclaims his past is behind him (former KKK ties)! Now if you have evidence he is still a KKK member I would like to know. You see I made a video for David Duke...an open letter to him from a black man. No reply was submitted. Now the Tea Party is very interesting bunch.

  • @EuphoricImpact (part 2) I have personally seen racist activity after personally attending several meetings (I think it was eleven total). All the meetings were in Midwestern States...so, maybe just some the TP members in the Midwest are this way? No one has ever given me a straight answer to what is meant when the classic line is delivered, "we want OUR country back!"

  • gulit by Association fail

  • Just because one person endorses a group of people does not mean that particular group holds that one persons ideals. That is a fallacy. But it does not mean that this endorsement is any less troubling. White sumpremacist are the scum of the earth, my opinion.

  • @dalhar20

    Not necessarily but the Tea Party is a white supremacist movement. The idea that white people are superior is at the core of the Koch Brothers' Tea Party movement.

  • @dalhar20 True, but in this case we can make an exception - unless the TP denounce his endorsement.

  • Watch Duke's brainwashed fanbase find this video and go apeshit.

  • @RickyMcGinnis Just like any Ron Palsy fanbase.

  • @donnyforte2 true. Alex Jones, and Allen West have similar fanbases as well.

  • @RickyMcGinnis He actually has one? The world never ceases to astound me.

Loading...
Alert icon