With all the poles and cars and trees in the flight path I highly doubt the "plane" wouldn't have struck a lot of those and left a trail of debri or even started exploding before it supposedly hit the building. Frankly, I think it was a long range missile.
@koopa1up I was thinking the same thing earlier. Airliners can't fly low to the ground without their flaps down and in another interview I heard a guy say something to the effect of the plane was flying... ...with it's flaps up.
@ThorstenHH89 Ok here's 2 names, Wilson & Darlene Flagg, 2 co workers of my cousin Mike, they were on Flight 77 and never came home or to work or anything. How's that ?
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
YVDdjLQkUV8& < Please, just watch and shut up. You are all making fools of yourselves by arguing the government bombed itself. Jesus Christ, don't even bother responding to me if you have nothing better to do in your life than to go around spreading conspiracy theories which are clearly FALSE. What the fuck, do you idiots expect the Govt to just hand us every single video of the crash? As if, in today's day and age, people wouldn't think it was edited. The 100+ witnesses aren't enough? Fuck.
its 'obvious' a plane hit, my mothers cousins sons uncle 'was there', he even saw the pilot, an arab guy, he lit a cigar while flicking a v-sign, he mouthed 'i hate america, you are all infidel bastards', before throwing his passport out the window before crashing, anyone who disagrees is an attention seeking twooftard.....how did i do shills? how did i do?
@abcbraveheart well they have to for evidence and legal reasons. The same happened with the zapruder film of the jfk assassination, taken immediately and not released until much long after any hopes of further trials could be held. I agree in the case of the confiscation, but to keep them private now that Maussoui, Khalid Seik Mohammed, bin al shibh, and bin laden are all taken care of is what frustrates me. And trust me I'm very weary of our govt, they relentlessly propagandicize marijuana=evil
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
i think the reason we haven't seen 'footage' yet is because they are working on making a fake one! they have obviously realised that their previous efforts have been ripped apart by sharp eyed people on the net. even top plane crash investigators have said that the sites don't make sense.
You also cant deny that pictures < video. I think they confiscated the other videos to hide all the 757 parts the government scattered around after the explosion. Thus taking pictures to make it believable. Honestly, I hope a plane really did crash into the white house and it actually was a terrorist attack. Don't you get a bad gut feeling when you think of the U.S government being the culprits of 9/11? I sure as hell hope its just all myths.
You cant deny physics... a plane that size making a hole so small. You cant deny that confiscating other more "clearer" videos of the crash being fishy. You cant deny that America entered Iraq for bigger reasons than promoting democracy. And you cant deny that George Bush stuttered when they asked him if he had prior knowledge of 9/11 before it happened. And you also cant deny that 9/11, as a whole, has to many mysteries to just stop talking about. You also cant deny my run on sentences.
@Bondie11 I deny that you have a logical explanation to the whereabouts of the passengers & crew of Flight 77 if you're saying that the plane didn't hit the Pentagon. Where are they all ? How come none of them ever came home or went back to work or even got their cars out of the airport parking garage ? What about all the American Airlines airplane debris all over the lawn ? ( Google it ) What about the eyewitnesses that saw the plane coming in ? I can't deny one thing, that you're an imbecile.
I don't believe in this conspiracy bullshit, as ALL, yes, ALL of these crappy and offensive brainless theories have been debunked. However, I do think we deserve more footage than 2 fisheyed cameras and a non revealing hotel video. Just release the footage from the hotel across the street which would've caught clear footage of impact and I'm fine, they'll still have 80+ tapes of evidence.
@immaNig69 You said no inside job conspiracy on the whole 9/11 event. Than how do you explain your question off the missing or inadequaate impact footage? If a person was guilty would they realease any incriminating evidence? Of course not. Because 30 minutes after the Pentagon was hit the asshole FBI swooped in and removed all video evidence from nearby buildings including the gas station which had a great view. The smoking gun is there and you are starting to get close. Question authority.
or why dont they just show us a clear video? they have over 80 tapes...the damage is not possible from a 757...the hole is wayyyy to small and the windows next to it should have got smashed out by the two HUGE engines
@ctcole77 in answer to all three of those questions.
F-15 Fighters ordered to intercept the high jacked planes 6 mins after WTC1 was hit? So you're saying that Flight 77 was Scrambled by Fighter jets at 8:52am that morning? interesting how Flight 77 just took off 2 mins prior to that, deviated it's flight path at 8:54am, continued flying into West Virginia and heading toward a NO FLY ZONE and stayed in the air for a total of 47 Minutes before crashing into the Pentagon.
@ctcole77 How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to 'STAND DOWN'? Easy, he's the vice president. In the event that the president cannot be reached (he was at an elementary school at the time) the chain of command is dropped to the Vice.
and your last question, how many idiots does it take to realize a plane travelling anywhere between 450-500MPH 5 feet above the ground is literally impossible.. well.. there you go.. the proof is in the pudding, but thanks for coming out and sharing!
@ctcole77 IF WE REMMBER RIGHT THE F-15s WERE SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN UNARMED AT THE TIME
ANOTHER INTERESTING THING IS THERE WAS TO BE AN INVESTAGTION INTO MILLIONS OF DOLLARE THAT WERE UNACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PENTIGON, ND THE VERY SPOT WHERE THE ( JET) CRASHED INTO THE BUILDING WAS WHERE THE FILES THAT THEY NEEDED REGARDINNG THE INVESTIGATION
@ThePHYL I don't know about you, but I don't store my important financials in sections of my house that are under renovation. I doubt the pentagon does either. Especially not 2.2 trillion.
@thepulls WELL I DOUBT THE MONEY WAS THERE IN THE BUILDING ITSELF, BUT LOTS OF PAPER WORK ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION WAS......AND WHERE OH WHERE ARE ALL THE PHOTOS FROM THE DOZENS OF SECURITY CAMERAS THAT ARE INSTALED AROUND THE PENTIGON, ONLY ONE PHOTO? I DO FIND THAT ODD, AND IF A JET CAME ACROSS AT THAT SPEED AND THAT LOW TO THE GROUND, WELL WHY ISN'T THE GRASS ALL AROUND THE BUILDING PERFECT, JUST PERFECT LAWN IN THE PHOTOS TAKEN AFTERWARDS...THERE ARE SO MANY QUESTIONS WITHOUT ANY ANSWERS
At :26 in the upper right video I can make out the left engine hanging under the wing. Your theories are too easily debunked, people. NOW, what CANNOT be debunked is how these untrained arabs could have flown these airliners more accurately than any airline pilot could (they tried in a simulator and cannot). Why did WTC7 fall in a controlled fashion. Firefighters want to know why bombs were going off in the towers. CRITIQUING THIS VIDEO MAKES PEOPLE LOOK DUMB BECAUSE IT IS *OBVIOUSLY* A 757!!!
@KathrynARyder Then why are there pictures of 757 parts in the pentagon like the titanium engine cores and landing gear parts? Why were there pieces of 757 fuselage skin out on the grass with the American Airlines decals on them? Doesn't add up.
A 911 docomentry stated that pentagon workers heard a helicopter just before the strike... not to mention the area it hit was being renavated so only restricted personal were aloud access, that to me is an easy way to get "plane parts" into the building
ok so since when do missiles come down from the sky bend like a curved Lshape to be parrellel to the ground then fly into it. if it were a missile it would have come in from higher up at a diagonal angle, unless the plane or whoever shot it was more or less at ground level and anyway looking at the scale of the object what missile today has a top fin that big and it overall that big.
@flipmasta14 This video may have been doctored to include the contrail and apparition. However, if this were a Global Hawk with a missile underneath, it would explain the lack of debris, the contrail, the explosion and hole, and the line of Navy and others who scoured the grounds for pieces and put them in trash bags, never to be seen again. Therefore, no 757 parts or bodies. And the flight path makes better sense, as a 757 wouldn't handle it. Just a thought!
@milackk7 who said it was doctored, and as for 757 parts yes they were found in the rumble both outside and inside the building (guessing they were planted there to huh?) and as for bodies, all but 1 who were aboard the flight were identified.
@flipmasta14 I realize you don't 'get it' - it's just a human limitation for some. Even if what you see in the video were an aircraft, it's far too small to be a 757. The deliberate blur prevents you from seeing this well. Why aren't you asking for the full tape(s)? Why not look at the immediate photos after the blast - where are the parts? Photos show them cleaning them up! Why believe those threatened to lie? Why no parts identified as an investigation "should" be, by serial number? WTF pal!
@milackk7 in time we will see the videos, they holding them for either security purposes, or they may feel americans couldnt handle seeing this. As for photos not showing debris, have you ever asked what is outside the photo? I stand by my belief not based on the physics, or the photos, or the crappy video but on actual eye witness accounts. this happened right over a major highway, there was no mistake as to what people would have seen and heard. the concensus is a AA airplane.
@flipmasta14 And here lies the problem. People reject science and use their flawed cognitive reasoning. The evidence against is overwhelming. There are witnesses whose testimony differs. Those that SAW a plane disappear into the Pentagon should be suspect. Witnesses at the scene saw virtually nothing, but statements changed over time (truth) It's not about 'not handling' the impact of video evidence. It's about destruction of evidence and NO investigation - at every turn: THAT is conspiracy.
@flipmasta14 Americans can't handle seeing a plane crash and an explosion? But they can handle watching videos of executions, or seeing photos of mutilated bodies, etc.? Riiiiiight.
@StratMatt777 I cannot expect everyone to have a sense of reasoning that gets us past the obvious. Yes, you see photos with scattered debris, yet almost none of it is plausible, or identified. READ the descriptions in your own link. "Very small pieces...tail number?" READ #5, #9 "But then I saw the landing gear." #10 "It made it very real." However none of this is evidence of a plane wreck when taken into actual CONTEXT. It just seems "very real" to those that knew nothing of what they claim.
@milackk7 I don't have to READ anything. I look at the pictures. I am expert in Boeing airliners and have been obsessed with them since I was 7. I have also worked as a mechanic in the Boeing plant. The 757 hs always been my favorite (and I have worked on them) I know EXACTLY what their parts look like. I don't care what ANY words say- I SEE THE 757 parts in the pictures! The nose went 6 feet through the last wall and there are cockpit parts. Fuselage is painted green inside. Yellow is wings
ok so since when do missiles come down from the sky bend like a curved Lshape to be parrellel to the ground then fly into it. if it were a missile it would have come in from higher up at a diagonal angle, unless the plane or whoever shot it was more or less at ground level
Google search: "Traveling on Delta Flight 1989 on 9/11" Why??
Not only did tail number N644AA (Flight 77) not take off on 9-11 from Dulles, but there is no record of N644AA arriving at Dulles in the 10 days preceding 9-11. Check Check departures from Washington Dulles on the above google link or google here: RITA Detailed Statistics Departures.
No flight11 left Boston Logan either
According to elreb, it seems that N644AA was out of service for a month prior to 9/11.
@gambleyourhealth hey ,the plane took down 5 light polesdown in that parking lot that were 50 ft apart. Missiles dont have 60 ft wingspans. There were also about 100 people who witnessed that saw a PLANE so,im not even going to proove it. I do have proof thow, do some research before commenting,its a much wizer thing to do.
@gladheateher4now and there are photos immediately after that also show those poles still intact. There is plenty of footage around to substantiate that right here at your finger tips. You have nothing or you would freely offer it in hopes to enlighten people. LIAR.
@gladheateher4now Hey everyone "gladheateher4now" says he has a video, DEFINITIVE PROOF of a plane hitting the pentagon. Dont you think he should share that video and put all this debate to rest? This would be one of the most important videos in HISTORY . . . . Personally I think he is a liar . . . does anyone else believe that he has this video?
Where is the plane? You would think the pentagon had more than one working camera covering that side of the building. Why dont they show us the other views?
And the government had the video how long before they released this? And how long does it take the average after effects user to insert a nice fake ambiguous plane shape into a piece of film - with the wrong time stamps, let's not forget that? Exactly.
Where was the wreckage? No wreckage? Oh but they identified a ton of bodies from the crash. So steel sheet metal and jet engines vaporized but finger tips? nah they were lying around all over the place.
9/11 is fucked. Nothing about the entire day and events that occurred make any plausible sense. Just take this video... how in hell could a 757 fly that low to the ground with such accuracy? And by an alleged pilot man who is terrible at flying? Do you think people want to question this day? We shouldn't have to, but there are so many holes, contradictions, and improbabilities that it all just doesn't make sense. For such a life changing day, there should be concrete, undeniable evidence.
"how in hell could a 757 fly that low to the ground with such accuracy?"
... What accuracy? You mean hitting one of the largest office buildings in the world?
"And by an alleged pilot man who is terrible at flying?"
I'm guessing you don't know what FAA standards are, and it doesn't matter, because you should get this, HE HAD A COMMERCIAL LICENSE, he knew enough to fly.
There are no holes, only someone whose not a pilot, commenting on things beyond what they've actually studied.
i think the accuracy he is talking about is getting the plane within ten feet of the ground and hitting the target, its not like the dropped it out of the sky on top of the pentagon. its basically skimming the ground, and id imagine that is not easy to do when you have a set landing point, unlike a runway which is super lo ng
"i think the accuracy he is talking about is getting the plane within ten feet of the ground"
Irrelevent, the Profile of the Pentagon is over 70 feet high, if he was ever taught to hold an altitude, which he would have been with a comemrcial license and a multi-engine rating, he could have done so, no matter how close to the ground he was, supposing it was smooth, which it was.
OK, so Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon? So...it eventually landed at its scheduled destination? And the passengers are alive to this day? And they all agreed to hide from their families for years and make them believe they're all dead? And Barbara Olsen called her husband on her cell during the flight and reported a hijacking as some kind of joke? No? Then where did Flight 77 crash, if not here?
wow, there is a sucker born every minute.....if anyone believes that 9/11 was an inside job, pack your shit & move in w/ Osama, the cave life suits you.
@wellifthemediasaysit You are stupid, clearly it's hard to capture something that is going at around 300MPH with cameras that have qualities of an old cell phone camera, and the framerate of one snapshot every 3-5 seconds, use your common sense&knowledge rather than to rely on videos and pictures.
@wellifthemediasaysit Then you are a stupid person. The government is going to blow up there own building. Do you ever listen to yourself talk or do you like to hear yourself talk about this BS pouring out of your mouth. Oh by the way if the the flight didn't go into the building, where did it go?
This is bullshit. I work for DHS/TSA at Buffalo Niagara International Airport. We have video cameras around the entire airport that have much better feed than what I am seeing here. Do you expect me to believe that the Pentagon, which is the center of our nations defense headquarters, has a video surveilance system which is comparable to a 7-11 corner market? Bullshit. If this alleged plane crash happened at BUF, I can guarantee we could provide better footage than this crap! CONSPIRACY 100%.
@shizukesa65 What did you expect? High Speed HD cameras? Who's going to pay the bill for it's power consumption and film/storage space? you? Buffalo Niagara International Airport may be willing to pay for higher quality and framerates, but not the pentagon since it has no other income than that of taxpayers, I certainly don't want to pay for 300 High Speed HD cameras at the pentagon! You can't just come to conclusions and say it was a conspiracy without looking at the facts.
Editing leaves tell-tale signs you cannot hide, and experts in the field have had more than enough time to take a look at these films and see what's off, yet none have come forward to claim these videos are anything less or more than what they are.
So I'm certiantly not going to take the "man off the street"'s opinion.
As to your "point", I cite the camera's frame rate, which is piss poor, and likely WOULD have after-images.
It doesn't look like much of anything. Although I do see a trail of white smoke and a white flash upon impact, which is strange albeit still inconclusive.
gee whiz, wzar1313, don't you know how tall the tail of a 757 is? It's not 1/5 the height of the pentagon walls. You are filling in the blanks in your mind to believe what you are told to believe.
I know how tall a 757 is, I also know TURBELEANCE is enough to knock them off.
If you think the entire profile of an aircraft needs to leave it's mark on the building, you are sadly mistaken.
Take the Empire State Building crash of 1945, the airplane in question was a B-25 with a wingspan of 67 feet, but the hole it left was only 18 x 20 feet.
Conspiracy? Or is it just a matter of physics you've yet learn about?
Anyway, tail marks and wing marks are there, so you fail.
THIS WAS AMERICAN 77 FROM IAD-LAX 757-200 CRASHED IN PENTAGONYOU CAN SEE THE TAIL AND BLURRY AA SIGN RED AND BLUE THIS WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB IF IT WAS A MISSLE WERES THE AA 757 THAT CRASHED??? EVERY VICTIM IS DEAD!! YOU WILL NEVER KNOW SO STOP JUDGING WHAT HAPPEN. EVEN THO UNITED 93 WAS SHOT DOWN MOST LIKELY BECUASE IT WAS GOING TO HIT THE...WHITE HOUSE BUT IF I MUST SAY IF OBBAMA WAS IN THE HOUSE AT THE TIME I WOUL SAY GO AHEAD CRASH INTO IT AND KILL THE MONKEY
Hey AKslim...You had no seat let alone the best seat...yeah, we;ll aaallll just believe you have all the truth and everything everyone else heard is BS because you didn't say it...
The dumbing of america,the pentagon has 86 video cameras pointed at it but not one shows a large 757 hitting it,are we that dumb to believe the government version??
It is a plane although not very clear. Besides missiles dont ever come in that low. Even a child knows that. The fake mongers need to understand this.
no guys, supposedly when it was going to hit the pentagon, it was flying low so all the street lights were hitting it and one it the wing which made it smoke so thats what the smoke was
@TheCodmw2rocks ...I see a truck driving down the road, thats about it. But no way it's a plane, not from any aspect of it. The #1 witness claims she turned on her computer and the bomb went off.
@Alaskaslim Nope Ive seen way too many vids on the actual people on site that saw the event take place and the plane went over the building---that simple...you can believe whatever you want,they got away with it at this point so why argue now? Your the one who believes the set up lie not me--truthers??...lol
No, there are people who claim it did, but no one saw as such.
People saw an E-3 flying over the White House, people saw Flight 77 from Arlington Cementary on a seemingly contradictory flight path, but actually concurs the official flight path if you knew what it was.
You believe horse shit, you don't have actual witnesses, I however do:
/watch?v=Q9ag6brfWro#t=37s
C-130 pilot, tracked Flight 77, NEARLY RAN INTO IT, had the best seat in the house, you lose.
The government could end ALL speculation once and for all if they would just release the damn tapes that show Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. What do they have to hide?
@JohnnieNaked You cant be serious. Your a blind patriot. " oh my government could never do such a thing to just go to war and make $ " or you are an agent. There is no fucking plane in that video. Where did the wings hit on impact. It was just a hole! IMPOSSIBLE!!
@caddy1010 First of all I'm not even American. Secondly, the Pentagon wasnt made of metal and glass like the WTC. It was mostly concrete and steel. Do you think if an aluminum plane hit a concrete parking lot it would make a perfectly plane shaped hole? It wouldn't, would it?
@caddy1010 Well most of the plane disintegrated on impact, which is to be expected from an aluminum plane travelling at 800 km/h hitting a concrete slab, but some wreckage was found, some on the lawn.
@caddy1010 I've seen pictures of the engines and very very graphic pictures of the body parts they found. It was a plane and there were definitely people on board.
@JohnnieNaked I know you are not talking about that SMALL engine shown? That is not a 747 engine! If you dont know that then i guess your the person who says " It was in the newspaper or online so it must be true" You say your not american? well i am and they are full of shit!
@caddy1010 I believe I know the picture you are referring to and no that is not the engine, it's the turbine cap. There are pictures of the engine casing BTW, which was made of steel and survived the crash.
@JohnnieNaked These are your words "Well most of the plane disintegrated on impact" Look at any other plane crash, there is no disentergration of the whole plane. you always see evidence there was a plane. Also notice the offices to the left of impact after they made the ceiling collapse (because the missile went right through) you will see paper unsinged, chairs unmoved etc. This is impossible.
@caddy1010 Yes it disintegrates but obviously not into dust. There was a shit ton of debris, all clearly from a jetliner. Check it out here: watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&feature=related
@JohnnieNaked The disintegrating plane theory? 1st time in history planes disintergrated. Shankville you cant see any parts of a plane. the coroner was one of the 1st on the ground said he job was done in 20 min. there was no plane and no bodies. all of the 1st day witnessess all changed the next day. explosions in towers to no explosions yet the towers were turned to dust 1st time in history
@caddy1010 Wtf are you talking about. They found both engines and the black box and cockpit flight recorders from Flight 97. There was a ton of debris. No HUGE chunks, since it basically hit the earth at a 90 degree angle going the speed of sound, but then what would you expect. Explain to me why the hell the government or whatever other shadow conspiracy would fly two planes into the WTCs, which everyone could see, yet two missiles one into the pentagon and one into Shanksville (??? why exactly
) What's the point of that? Isn't it like a billion times easier (if it was a conspiracy) to fly 4 planes???? They did it with the first two why wouldn't they keep some coherency in the 'cover up' story. Why would they allow any speculation it was anything BUT a plane? Use your head for crying out loud.
@JohnnieNaked seems to me the point is to show there is no big ass jet? Duhhh, p.s. flying 4 planes into buildings "IS" a conspiracy, jeeze, a couple missile's it would still be a conspiracy. every single theory (including) the Govs, is a conspiracy theory. maybe I'm not understanding you?
1) People point out that there is little photographic evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon (this is true)
2) They claim this fact is evidence of a conspiracy.
3) IF IT WAS A CONSPIRACY, there is no advantage whatsoever to using anything BUT a plane at the pentagon. Why would they use a missile at the Pentagon and planes at the WTCs when they could have used planes at every location to make the cover story look better.
4) If what hit the pentagon was NOT a plane, then yes, it was clearly a conspiracy. But it was orchestrated by the stupidest conspirators in history. They could have used a PLANE and no one would have known!
@JohnnieNaked The towers are CLEARLY being pulverized from the top down STEEL & CONCRETE..IMPOSSIBLE this is not falling into itself for the steel supports would remain if it "pancaked" .A Fireman said biggest item found was half a phone pad. This is the real world. Evil is real. WAKE UP!!!
Get your head out of your ass. Go back to school if you have to but learn how to think for yourself. Don't just buy whatever bullshit people make into videos set to creepy background music as fact. You want to prove even the possibility it was a conspiracy to me? Give me 5 FACTS, 5 little pieces of EVIDENCE that it WAS a conspiracy. I hear conspiracy conspiracy conspiracy from you idiots but never any FACTS or real EVIDENCE of one. Somebody must have come out and said they were involved by now.
if it was a conspiracy. I want hard evidence, not rhetoric. I want ANYTHING concrete, not some retarded interpretation of a grainy video clip. I'm all ears.
@JohnnieNaked I believe I have given you about 8. Now that I think about it I feel that you are right and I have been wrong! You are a light bearer' and have made me see more clearly. Thank You!
@JohnnieNaked, lol, got ya. all I am saying is all the conspiracy theories, are conspiracy theory. no matter what side you pick, 4 planes, 2 planes w/missiles, 10 guys w/ parachutes? etc. for some reason a lot of people don't understand that 4 planes, the official story, is by definition still a conspiracy theory. just seems funny some people are on one conspiracy, and calling the other "the conspiracy" no matter what happened it was a conspiracy. thats all i'm saying., sorry about that o.k.
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 Yes I agree with that. Obviously. But I'm using 'conspiracy' in terms of the shadowy vague diabolical plan hatched by the 'government' or whatever that most people refer to.
@JohnnieNaked Disintergrating planes? I have never seen a plane crash that didnt look like a plane crash yet it happened twice that day. Never seen a steel building collapse due to fire yet 3 happened that day and 1 didnt get hit by the plane. Yet they were able to "pull it as silverstein said its impossible to do a pro. demolition in 1 day yet u call me retard. You must be an Agent. Get off this corrupt gov. nuts and cont. your tenacious d impressions.
@caddy1010 Well 'pull' is not an industry term for 'demolition,' it actually means PULL IT DOWN with cranes (yes it was THAT weakened). They wanted to do this to prevent any more damage to the surrounding buildings, but it collapsed before they had a chance. There is video of a firefighter dismayed over the fact that they had been recalled from WTC7. All of the personnel were evacuated, because they were nearly certain the building was going to collapse.
@JohnnieNaked If it means pull it down with cranes then we can deduce that would also be a lie because we know there were no cranes. B.B.C. reported it down before it went down. You can see the "crump" of the roof sinking in and it coming straight down.
It's only the Truthie Cult that insists Silverstein's comments has anything to do with demo. Both he and the fire chief say they were referring to pulling out the team that had been looking for survivors to evacuate.
@JohnnieNaked Also think about this. If the purpose was to kill as many people as possible why didnt they crash into all nuclear sites, like the one down the way from the pentagon?
@caddy1010 A: That wasn't the purpose of the terrorists, (their purpose was to hit symbolic institutions of the USA, Flight 97 was due to hit the Capitol) B: an explosion doesnt set of a nuclear bomb retard, a nuclear reaction does.
And regarding the taxi cab driver, he admitted he was used. The light pole inside the taxi cab is pretty famous and has been questioned time and time again. Any additional light posts you saw falling around. I have plenty of pictures from news papers of the day and also you can search in the internet. It's free to search. Please save the BS about being there. You are number 9,021,272 stating you were there. A guy that calls himself "fastzman" says he saw the plane's tire hit a car....yep.
Wait...."Stop commenting on something you didn't see"...Hmmm AND you were there.....
Sr. Can I ask you what is your name nad how come YOU above all the "evidence" exposed have NEVER gone national? YOU actually SAW the tail section?????? Almost complete?
WOW...I have friends in the media that would love to interview you. Please let me know if you are available. You will be doing this country the most valuable contribution in clearing this 911 mess.
missile.
the nose is in one frame then the next frame a huge explosion. moving way to fast to be a giant boeing.
48mmwatch 2 months ago
9/11 was bullshit, no plane that size would make a hole that damn small. Its next to impossible, the holes on the WTC where huge.
Degitalxxxde3trgfXXX 4 months ago
With all the poles and cars and trees in the flight path I highly doubt the "plane" wouldn't have struck a lot of those and left a trail of debri or even started exploding before it supposedly hit the building. Frankly, I think it was a long range missile.
sphinxart 5 months ago
I think i'm right when I say that the black boxes from those aircraft were never recovered....1st time in history that that has happened.
bermudaguy1 5 months ago
I think you truthers are fools. That is what I, and every other logical thinking person on the planet thinks.
kyokogodai 5 months ago
@kyokogodai i think its clealry boeing squiggly airliner perftly capable of that kinda demolition
adam2000z 4 months ago
@koopa1up I was thinking the same thing earlier. Airliners can't fly low to the ground without their flaps down and in another interview I heard a guy say something to the effect of the plane was flying... ...with it's flaps up.
Redden08 5 months ago
Regarding the hole in the pentagon... Maybe the pentagon wasn't made out of graham crackers like the WTC towers were.
thepulls 5 months ago
@ThorstenHH89 Ok here's 2 names, Wilson & Darlene Flagg, 2 co workers of my cousin Mike, they were on Flight 77 and never came home or to work or anything. How's that ?
iwinofcourse 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Shills/Trolls/Disinfo (S.T.Ds) on here are under total control from their Handlers/Orderers/Masters/Owners (H.O.M.Os). Basically the HOMOs spread their STDs to try and infect free speech about 9/11 and stop people from spreading the truth, about 9/11 begging ppl to shut up, i wont do it, its so obvious and blatant, yet another false flag slaughtering 3000 innocent ppl, its disgusting, and the perps will burn in hell for it!
wellifthemediasaysit 6 months ago
Looks like the tail fin of a large low flying plane that has already picked up slight damage from hitting lamposts.
Doesn't look like a missile.
bogbot11 6 months ago
YVDdjLQkUV8& < Please, just watch and shut up. You are all making fools of yourselves by arguing the government bombed itself. Jesus Christ, don't even bother responding to me if you have nothing better to do in your life than to go around spreading conspiracy theories which are clearly FALSE. What the fuck, do you idiots expect the Govt to just hand us every single video of the crash? As if, in today's day and age, people wouldn't think it was edited. The 100+ witnesses aren't enough? Fuck.
cartmen2211 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
its 'obvious' a plane hit, my mothers cousins sons uncle 'was there', he even saw the pilot, an arab guy, he lit a cigar while flicking a v-sign, he mouthed 'i hate america, you are all infidel bastards', before throwing his passport out the window before crashing, anyone who disagrees is an attention seeking twooftard.....how did i do shills? how did i do?
wellifthemediasaysit 6 months ago
It was a type of MBB AS34 Komoran or Moskit Anti-Ship Missile.
The only these kind of missiles can fly 800 yards per second with two feet over land.
privateart100 6 months ago
@abcbraveheart well they have to for evidence and legal reasons. The same happened with the zapruder film of the jfk assassination, taken immediately and not released until much long after any hopes of further trials could be held. I agree in the case of the confiscation, but to keep them private now that Maussoui, Khalid Seik Mohammed, bin al shibh, and bin laden are all taken care of is what frustrates me. And trust me I'm very weary of our govt, they relentlessly propagandicize marijuana=evil
immaNig69 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
wellifthemediasaysit 7 months ago
missle
Harlottin 7 months ago
i think the reason we haven't seen 'footage' yet is because they are working on making a fake one! they have obviously realised that their previous efforts have been ripped apart by sharp eyed people on the net. even top plane crash investigators have said that the sites don't make sense.
thehoff1982 8 months ago
You also cant deny that pictures < video. I think they confiscated the other videos to hide all the 757 parts the government scattered around after the explosion. Thus taking pictures to make it believable. Honestly, I hope a plane really did crash into the white house and it actually was a terrorist attack. Don't you get a bad gut feeling when you think of the U.S government being the culprits of 9/11? I sure as hell hope its just all myths.
Bondie11 8 months ago
You cant deny physics... a plane that size making a hole so small. You cant deny that confiscating other more "clearer" videos of the crash being fishy. You cant deny that America entered Iraq for bigger reasons than promoting democracy. And you cant deny that George Bush stuttered when they asked him if he had prior knowledge of 9/11 before it happened. And you also cant deny that 9/11, as a whole, has to many mysteries to just stop talking about. You also cant deny my run on sentences.
Bondie11 8 months ago 12
@Bondie11 I deny that you have a logical explanation to the whereabouts of the passengers & crew of Flight 77 if you're saying that the plane didn't hit the Pentagon. Where are they all ? How come none of them ever came home or went back to work or even got their cars out of the airport parking garage ? What about all the American Airlines airplane debris all over the lawn ? ( Google it ) What about the eyewitnesses that saw the plane coming in ? I can't deny one thing, that you're an imbecile.
iwinofcourse 6 months ago
@Bondie11 Actually you see the size of the firefighters compared to Pentagon, you'll see that
the hole is a whole lot larger then you think
GeminiSon 5 months ago 2
Comment removed
Bondie11 8 months ago
Check out the Youtube video 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Another Closer Look.
trimas3 8 months ago
damn it, where's the dates on these videos?? The real ones, showing Sept 12, 2001???
PurePowerPunk 8 months ago
I don't believe in this conspiracy bullshit, as ALL, yes, ALL of these crappy and offensive brainless theories have been debunked. However, I do think we deserve more footage than 2 fisheyed cameras and a non revealing hotel video. Just release the footage from the hotel across the street which would've caught clear footage of impact and I'm fine, they'll still have 80+ tapes of evidence.
immaNig69 8 months ago
@immaNig69 You said no inside job conspiracy on the whole 9/11 event. Than how do you explain your question off the missing or inadequaate impact footage? If a person was guilty would they realease any incriminating evidence? Of course not. Because 30 minutes after the Pentagon was hit the asshole FBI swooped in and removed all video evidence from nearby buildings including the gas station which had a great view. The smoking gun is there and you are starting to get close. Question authority.
abcbraveheart 7 months ago
or why dont they just show us a clear video? they have over 80 tapes...the damage is not possible from a 757...the hole is wayyyy to small and the windows next to it should have got smashed out by the two HUGE engines
killuminati1871 8 months ago 3
@killuminati1871 They hardly have a clear video of the crash at the Pentagon. Physics explain the holes.
Auzea 8 months ago
@Auzea fake Physics might... but the two engines should have made SOME damage
killuminati1871 8 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?
How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?
How many of Pilots for 911 Truth's professionals have experience flying a Boeing 767?
ctcole77 6 months ago
@ctcole77 in answer to all three of those questions.
F-15 Fighters ordered to intercept the high jacked planes 6 mins after WTC1 was hit? So you're saying that Flight 77 was Scrambled by Fighter jets at 8:52am that morning? interesting how Flight 77 just took off 2 mins prior to that, deviated it's flight path at 8:54am, continued flying into West Virginia and heading toward a NO FLY ZONE and stayed in the air for a total of 47 Minutes before crashing into the Pentagon.
koopa1up 6 months ago
@ctcole77 How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to 'STAND DOWN'? Easy, he's the vice president. In the event that the president cannot be reached (he was at an elementary school at the time) the chain of command is dropped to the Vice.
and your last question, how many idiots does it take to realize a plane travelling anywhere between 450-500MPH 5 feet above the ground is literally impossible.. well.. there you go.. the proof is in the pudding, but thanks for coming out and sharing!
koopa1up 6 months ago
@ctcole77 IF WE REMMBER RIGHT THE F-15s WERE SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN UNARMED AT THE TIME
ANOTHER INTERESTING THING IS THERE WAS TO BE AN INVESTAGTION INTO MILLIONS OF DOLLARE THAT WERE UNACCOUNTED FOR BY THE PENTIGON, ND THE VERY SPOT WHERE THE ( JET) CRASHED INTO THE BUILDING WAS WHERE THE FILES THAT THEY NEEDED REGARDINNG THE INVESTIGATION
ThePHYL 6 months ago
@ThePHYL I don't know about you, but I don't store my important financials in sections of my house that are under renovation. I doubt the pentagon does either. Especially not 2.2 trillion.
thepulls 5 months ago
@thepulls WELL I DOUBT THE MONEY WAS THERE IN THE BUILDING ITSELF, BUT LOTS OF PAPER WORK ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION WAS......AND WHERE OH WHERE ARE ALL THE PHOTOS FROM THE DOZENS OF SECURITY CAMERAS THAT ARE INSTALED AROUND THE PENTIGON, ONLY ONE PHOTO? I DO FIND THAT ODD, AND IF A JET CAME ACROSS AT THAT SPEED AND THAT LOW TO THE GROUND, WELL WHY ISN'T THE GRASS ALL AROUND THE BUILDING PERFECT, JUST PERFECT LAWN IN THE PHOTOS TAKEN AFTERWARDS...THERE ARE SO MANY QUESTIONS WITHOUT ANY ANSWERS
ThePHYL 5 months ago
At :26 in the upper right video I can make out the left engine hanging under the wing. Your theories are too easily debunked, people. NOW, what CANNOT be debunked is how these untrained arabs could have flown these airliners more accurately than any airline pilot could (they tried in a simulator and cannot). Why did WTC7 fall in a controlled fashion. Firefighters want to know why bombs were going off in the towers. CRITIQUING THIS VIDEO MAKES PEOPLE LOOK DUMB BECAUSE IT IS *OBVIOUSLY* A 757!!!
StratMatt777 9 months ago
I think a fighter jet flew in close enough to confuse some witnesses and shot a missle into the Pentagon before flying away...
KathrynARyder 10 months ago
@KathrynARyder Then why are there pictures of 757 parts in the pentagon like the titanium engine cores and landing gear parts? Why were there pieces of 757 fuselage skin out on the grass with the American Airlines decals on them? Doesn't add up.
StratMatt777 9 months ago
A 911 docomentry stated that pentagon workers heard a helicopter just before the strike... not to mention the area it hit was being renavated so only restricted personal were aloud access, that to me is an easy way to get "plane parts" into the building
triplenippleashtre 11 months ago
ok so since when do missiles come down from the sky bend like a curved Lshape to be parrellel to the ground then fly into it. if it were a missile it would have come in from higher up at a diagonal angle, unless the plane or whoever shot it was more or less at ground level and anyway looking at the scale of the object what missile today has a top fin that big and it overall that big.
flipmasta14 1 year ago
@flipmasta14 This video may have been doctored to include the contrail and apparition. However, if this were a Global Hawk with a missile underneath, it would explain the lack of debris, the contrail, the explosion and hole, and the line of Navy and others who scoured the grounds for pieces and put them in trash bags, never to be seen again. Therefore, no 757 parts or bodies. And the flight path makes better sense, as a 757 wouldn't handle it. Just a thought!
milackk7 11 months ago
@milackk7 who said it was doctored, and as for 757 parts yes they were found in the rumble both outside and inside the building (guessing they were planted there to huh?) and as for bodies, all but 1 who were aboard the flight were identified.
flipmasta14 11 months ago 2
@flipmasta14 I realize you don't 'get it' - it's just a human limitation for some. Even if what you see in the video were an aircraft, it's far too small to be a 757. The deliberate blur prevents you from seeing this well. Why aren't you asking for the full tape(s)? Why not look at the immediate photos after the blast - where are the parts? Photos show them cleaning them up! Why believe those threatened to lie? Why no parts identified as an investigation "should" be, by serial number? WTF pal!
milackk7 11 months ago
@milackk7 in time we will see the videos, they holding them for either security purposes, or they may feel americans couldnt handle seeing this. As for photos not showing debris, have you ever asked what is outside the photo? I stand by my belief not based on the physics, or the photos, or the crappy video but on actual eye witness accounts. this happened right over a major highway, there was no mistake as to what people would have seen and heard. the concensus is a AA airplane.
flipmasta14 11 months ago
@flipmasta14 And here lies the problem. People reject science and use their flawed cognitive reasoning. The evidence against is overwhelming. There are witnesses whose testimony differs. Those that SAW a plane disappear into the Pentagon should be suspect. Witnesses at the scene saw virtually nothing, but statements changed over time (truth) It's not about 'not handling' the impact of video evidence. It's about destruction of evidence and NO investigation - at every turn: THAT is conspiracy.
milackk7 11 months ago
@flipmasta14 Americans can't handle seeing a plane crash and an explosion? But they can handle watching videos of executions, or seeing photos of mutilated bodies, etc.? Riiiiiight.
corruptedsilence 10 months ago
@milackk7 w w w . rense.com/general32/phot.htm
StratMatt777 10 months ago
@StratMatt777 I cannot expect everyone to have a sense of reasoning that gets us past the obvious. Yes, you see photos with scattered debris, yet almost none of it is plausible, or identified. READ the descriptions in your own link. "Very small pieces...tail number?" READ #5, #9 "But then I saw the landing gear." #10 "It made it very real." However none of this is evidence of a plane wreck when taken into actual CONTEXT. It just seems "very real" to those that knew nothing of what they claim.
milackk7 9 months ago
@milackk7 I don't have to READ anything. I look at the pictures. I am expert in Boeing airliners and have been obsessed with them since I was 7. I have also worked as a mechanic in the Boeing plant. The 757 hs always been my favorite (and I have worked on them) I know EXACTLY what their parts look like. I don't care what ANY words say- I SEE THE 757 parts in the pictures! The nose went 6 feet through the last wall and there are cockpit parts. Fuselage is painted green inside. Yellow is wings
StratMatt777 9 months ago
ok so since when do missiles come down from the sky bend like a curved Lshape to be parrellel to the ground then fly into it. if it were a missile it would have come in from higher up at a diagonal angle, unless the plane or whoever shot it was more or less at ground level
flipmasta14 1 year ago
Missile, drone, private jet or f-14 but definitely not 757.
MyFishyWishy 1 year ago
STOP BLOCKING MY YOUTUBE POSTS BUSH CIA says JOhn Joseph O'Brien :-)
^
GOOGLE > 77 says ONEWHITEDUCK
\/
GOOGLE BUSH DID 911 says ONEWHITEDUCK
AND FUCK YOU AGAIN CIA says John Joseph O'Brien :-)
TKTRV 1 year ago
Why not release all the videos if there is nothing to hide? This video reveals a little more than nothing--it looks like a missile to me.
motamanx6 1 year ago
@motamanx6
yes, even to the untrained eye and the average Joe, within a few seconds, it's obviously a missile
shitonMOHAMMAD 1 year ago
Missles have fins
tomarlyn 1 year ago
Google search: "Traveling on Delta Flight 1989 on 9/11" Why??
Not only did tail number N644AA (Flight 77) not take off on 9-11 from Dulles, but there is no record of N644AA arriving at Dulles in the 10 days preceding 9-11. Check Check departures from Washington Dulles on the above google link or google here: RITA Detailed Statistics Departures.
No flight11 left Boston Logan either
According to elreb, it seems that N644AA was out of service for a month prior to 9/11.
Chidanandaji 1 year ago
if this istn flight 77 what happen to it? i think this is a rocket
skateboy159 1 year ago
If it really was a flight 77 why do we only get this video ? BIG QUESTIONMARK ?
And so MANY MORE QUESTIONS.
PEACE.
EchtRelaxed 1 year ago
giggles, how does a plane get close enough to the ground to land?
Rangerbelt 1 year ago
how does a plane that's flying that high in the sky get that close to the ground before penetrating a building?
gigglesgurl21 1 year ago
wish every one to wake up you dumb ass holes all a set up der
jjasonell 1 year ago
ITS A PLANE and i have the vid to PROOVE it !!
gladheateher4now 1 year ago
@gladheateher4now then post said video or you are just a liar.
gambleyourhealth 1 year ago
@gambleyourhealth hey ,the plane took down 5 light polesdown in that parking lot that were 50 ft apart. Missiles dont have 60 ft wingspans. There were also about 100 people who witnessed that saw a PLANE so,im not even going to proove it. I do have proof thow, do some research before commenting,its a much wizer thing to do.
gladheateher4now 1 year ago
@gladheateher4now and there are photos immediately after that also show those poles still intact. There is plenty of footage around to substantiate that right here at your finger tips. You have nothing or you would freely offer it in hopes to enlighten people. LIAR.
gambleyourhealth 1 year ago
@gladheateher4now Hey everyone "gladheateher4now" says he has a video, DEFINITIVE PROOF of a plane hitting the pentagon. Dont you think he should share that video and put all this debate to rest? This would be one of the most important videos in HISTORY . . . . Personally I think he is a liar . . . does anyone else believe that he has this video?
gambleyourhealth 1 year ago
if you pause at .47 you can see above the pillar a "fin" of some sort....i mean it does like the tail of a plane right there
lonewolf2379 1 year ago
if the conspiracy is false, release all the cctv footage
chitchcott 1 year ago
Where is the plane? You would think the pentagon had more than one working camera covering that side of the building. Why dont they show us the other views?
infoseeker264 1 year ago
And the government had the video how long before they released this? And how long does it take the average after effects user to insert a nice fake ambiguous plane shape into a piece of film - with the wrong time stamps, let's not forget that? Exactly.
kensmind 1 year ago
mossad did it
=nIH50KhpVWg
hoxran 1 year ago
Where was the wreckage? No wreckage? Oh but they identified a ton of bodies from the crash. So steel sheet metal and jet engines vaporized but finger tips? nah they were lying around all over the place.
cracksnake 1 year ago
why would a plane fly along the ground to hit the side of such a short building...why not dive into it thats what i dont get
hailtotheking324 1 year ago
you can cleary see when he zooms its a plane cause of the colors and the shape so if you think it was a hoax theres proof right there
CptCrunchh 1 year ago
its a superman
Glavetina988 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal You might want to look into that before you call someone an idiot. Those poles were knocked down by people.
rsx123 1 year ago
i was there it was a tomahawk missile and i saw a man in black light the green visco fuse then he ran away
blindedby2monkeys 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal,
People can! You need to take a look at footage of the crash where 'those' poles are still standing .CNN footage
dobberdoss 1 year ago
FAKE PLANE
Getdamoneyng0 1 year ago
0:06 top right. I don't care who you are or what planet you're from that's a plane wing!
BeyondTheGovernment 1 year ago
Sure looks like a 100 tonne Boeing 757 to me :/ it's disturbing this is the best video evidence anyone can come up with, is it even real?
hanzaninja3 1 year ago
Tomahawk Missle
XxLongboardxX 1 year ago
9/11 is fucked. Nothing about the entire day and events that occurred make any plausible sense. Just take this video... how in hell could a 757 fly that low to the ground with such accuracy? And by an alleged pilot man who is terrible at flying? Do you think people want to question this day? We shouldn't have to, but there are so many holes, contradictions, and improbabilities that it all just doesn't make sense. For such a life changing day, there should be concrete, undeniable evidence.
PerryHero 1 year ago
@PerryHero
"how in hell could a 757 fly that low to the ground with such accuracy?"
... What accuracy? You mean hitting one of the largest office buildings in the world?
"And by an alleged pilot man who is terrible at flying?"
I'm guessing you don't know what FAA standards are, and it doesn't matter, because you should get this, HE HAD A COMMERCIAL LICENSE, he knew enough to fly.
There are no holes, only someone whose not a pilot, commenting on things beyond what they've actually studied.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
@Alaskaslim
i think the accuracy he is talking about is getting the plane within ten feet of the ground and hitting the target, its not like the dropped it out of the sky on top of the pentagon. its basically skimming the ground, and id imagine that is not easy to do when you have a set landing point, unlike a runway which is super lo ng
r0llskyay0 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@r0llskyay0
"i think the accuracy he is talking about is getting the plane within ten feet of the ground"
Irrelevent, the Profile of the Pentagon is over 70 feet high, if he was ever taught to hold an altitude, which he would have been with a comemrcial license and a multi-engine rating, he could have done so, no matter how close to the ground he was, supposing it was smooth, which it was.
"its basically skimming the ground"
For less than 7 seconds, not skill, just luck.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
@PerryHero
Oh and as to "concrete, undeniable evidence." The Truth movement itself has already provided that, here they are ADMITTING Flight 77 crashed there:
911research(.)wtc7(.)net/essays/pentagon/index(.)html
Your argument is not only wrong, it was made obsolete at least 5 years ago.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
OK, so Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon? So...it eventually landed at its scheduled destination? And the passengers are alive to this day? And they all agreed to hide from their families for years and make them believe they're all dead? And Barbara Olsen called her husband on her cell during the flight and reported a hijacking as some kind of joke? No? Then where did Flight 77 crash, if not here?
L5player 1 year ago
@L5player Cells dont work in teh air.
stcywll 1 year ago
@L5player, My thoughts exactly.
Where did the passengers from the flight go?, if their flight didn't hit the Pentagon?.
Sick3ninVend3tta 1 year ago
wow, there is a sucker born every minute.....if anyone believes that 9/11 was an inside job, pack your shit & move in w/ Osama, the cave life suits you.
lynneb88 1 year ago
Wow thanks ass holes for using cameras that have worse quality than a 93 film photo camera.
gamemaster905 1 year ago
@gamemaster905 What did you expect? a High Speed HD camera? Who's going to pay the bill for it's power consumption and film/storage space? you?
masteranimation2008 1 year ago
this is the same as everything else on here. You cant really see a damb thing.
This is poop
4840 1 year ago
Yeah that doesn't look like plane asshole.
VitaminsAndPiss 1 year ago
CERTAINLY AINT NO PASSENGER JET, NO WAY IN HELL, WERE NOT STUPID, LOOKS LIKE PENTAGON WAS BOMBED FROM INSIDE,
wellifthemediasaysit 1 year ago
@wellifthemediasaysit You are stupid, clearly it's hard to capture something that is going at around 300MPH with cameras that have qualities of an old cell phone camera, and the framerate of one snapshot every 3-5 seconds, use your common sense&knowledge rather than to rely on videos and pictures.
masteranimation2008 1 year ago
@wellifthemediasaysit Then you are a stupid person. The government is going to blow up there own building. Do you ever listen to yourself talk or do you like to hear yourself talk about this BS pouring out of your mouth. Oh by the way if the the flight didn't go into the building, where did it go?
jfriedmann81 1 year ago
This is bullshit. I work for DHS/TSA at Buffalo Niagara International Airport. We have video cameras around the entire airport that have much better feed than what I am seeing here. Do you expect me to believe that the Pentagon, which is the center of our nations defense headquarters, has a video surveilance system which is comparable to a 7-11 corner market? Bullshit. If this alleged plane crash happened at BUF, I can guarantee we could provide better footage than this crap! CONSPIRACY 100%.
shizukesa65 1 year ago
@shizukesa65 What did you expect? High Speed HD cameras? Who's going to pay the bill for it's power consumption and film/storage space? you? Buffalo Niagara International Airport may be willing to pay for higher quality and framerates, but not the pentagon since it has no other income than that of taxpayers, I certainly don't want to pay for 300 High Speed HD cameras at the pentagon! You can't just come to conclusions and say it was a conspiracy without looking at the facts.
masteranimation2008 1 year ago
In the first explosion frame you can still see the object on the right, this vid has definitely been messed around with!
donutmoron 1 year ago
@donutmoron
Stop acting like you're a digital editor.
Editing leaves tell-tale signs you cannot hide, and experts in the field have had more than enough time to take a look at these films and see what's off, yet none have come forward to claim these videos are anything less or more than what they are.
So I'm certiantly not going to take the "man off the street"'s opinion.
As to your "point", I cite the camera's frame rate, which is piss poor, and likely WOULD have after-images.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
cruising missile. no doubt.
th3dig1tal0n3 1 year ago
It doesn't look like much of anything. Although I do see a trail of white smoke and a white flash upon impact, which is strange albeit still inconclusive.
richgilb 1 year ago
gee whiz, wzar1313, don't you know how tall the tail of a 757 is? It's not 1/5 the height of the pentagon walls. You are filling in the blanks in your mind to believe what you are told to believe.
pity.
HVYMETL 1 year ago
@HVYMETL
I know how tall a 757 is, I also know TURBELEANCE is enough to knock them off.
If you think the entire profile of an aircraft needs to leave it's mark on the building, you are sadly mistaken.
Take the Empire State Building crash of 1945, the airplane in question was a B-25 with a wingspan of 67 feet, but the hole it left was only 18 x 20 feet.
Conspiracy? Or is it just a matter of physics you've yet learn about?
Anyway, tail marks and wing marks are there, so you fail.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
THIS WAS AMERICAN 77 FROM IAD-LAX 757-200 CRASHED IN PENTAGONYOU CAN SEE THE TAIL AND BLURRY AA SIGN RED AND BLUE THIS WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB IF IT WAS A MISSLE WERES THE AA 757 THAT CRASHED??? EVERY VICTIM IS DEAD!! YOU WILL NEVER KNOW SO STOP JUDGING WHAT HAPPEN. EVEN THO UNITED 93 WAS SHOT DOWN MOST LIKELY BECUASE IT WAS GOING TO HIT THE...WHITE HOUSE BUT IF I MUST SAY IF OBBAMA WAS IN THE HOUSE AT THE TIME I WOUL SAY GO AHEAD CRASH INTO IT AND KILL THE MONKEY
wizzair1313 1 year ago
Hey AKslim...You had no seat let alone the best seat...yeah, we;ll aaallll just believe you have all the truth and everything everyone else heard is BS because you didn't say it...
TheSevnthWarrior 1 year ago
who ever says 9/11 was an inside job, are stupid ignorants nerd who must get a life and friends
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
a flying white dong!? idk. People get off Youtube
kprofscrts 1 year ago
RE:9/11 there are problems at each 9/11 incident,Bush Quote:Testify under oath,no but I would be happy to meet with them.Give me a break!!!
Zogby poll ,66% of New Yorkers believe 9/11 was an inside job.
If you believe Bush/Cheney I have some swamp land for sale,that would be a great investment
todclown 1 year ago
The dumbing of america,the pentagon has 86 video cameras pointed at it but not one shows a large 757 hitting it,are we that dumb to believe the government version??
todclown 1 year ago
@todclown
The dumbing of people, the 86 videos were not just from the Pentagon, but from all across D.C., the WTC attack, and even a place down in Florida.
Are we dumb enough to believe the version of people who don't do the research?
Fail.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
everyone here should also watch In Plane Site on Google Video.
LaYinGdoWnTHeTRuTH99 1 year ago
It is a plane although not very clear. Besides missiles dont ever come in that low. Even a child knows that. The fake mongers need to understand this.
kolgy1 1 year ago
looks like propaganda full of subliminal messages to appease the sheeple
lowaces 1 year ago
no guys, supposedly when it was going to hit the pentagon, it was flying low so all the street lights were hitting it and one it the wing which made it smoke so thats what the smoke was
MrApplejacks2012 1 year ago
please what is the name of the music ?
ppuer 1 year ago
Nothing was found from the missing plane...not here, not anywhere. No engine--nothing.
The emplyee working there that morning explained what took place..it was a bomb planted in the bldg.
anddihier 1 year ago
@anddihier ok explain the smoke.
TheCodmw2rocks 1 year ago
@TheCodmw2rocks ...I see a truck driving down the road, thats about it. But no way it's a plane, not from any aspect of it. The #1 witness claims she turned on her computer and the bomb went off.
anddihier 1 year ago
@anddihier
No one claims that, there were 104 witnesses outside, and they ALL state a plane ran into the building.
You fail, and I bet you don't even know why, well here, I'll let OTHER truthers spell it out for you:
911research(.)wtc7(.)net/essays/pentagontrap(.)html
By claiming there was no plane, you're apparently falling for a "bobby trap", nice job.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
@anddihier
Plenty was found from the plane, you didn't look this up.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
@Alaskaslim Nope Ive seen way too many vids on the actual people on site that saw the event take place and the plane went over the building---that simple...you can believe whatever you want,they got away with it at this point so why argue now? Your the one who believes the set up lie not me--truthers??...lol
anddihier 1 year ago
@anddihier
No, there are people who claim it did, but no one saw as such.
People saw an E-3 flying over the White House, people saw Flight 77 from Arlington Cementary on a seemingly contradictory flight path, but actually concurs the official flight path if you knew what it was.
You believe horse shit, you don't have actual witnesses, I however do:
/watch?v=Q9ag6brfWro#t=37s
C-130 pilot, tracked Flight 77, NEARLY RAN INTO IT, had the best seat in the house, you lose.
Alaskaslim 1 year ago
The government could end ALL speculation once and for all if they would just release the damn tapes that show Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. What do they have to hide?
NetwurkpunK 1 year ago
illuminati.
H591boy 1 year ago
missle definately
JvillnEnt 2 years ago
That's the tail of the plane, you can see the nose too. The smoke is coming from the right engine.
JohnnieNaked 2 years ago
@JohnnieNaked You cant be serious. Your a blind patriot. " oh my government could never do such a thing to just go to war and make $ " or you are an agent. There is no fucking plane in that video. Where did the wings hit on impact. It was just a hole! IMPOSSIBLE!!
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 First of all I'm not even American. Secondly, the Pentagon wasnt made of metal and glass like the WTC. It was mostly concrete and steel. Do you think if an aluminum plane hit a concrete parking lot it would make a perfectly plane shaped hole? It wouldn't, would it?
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked Well where are the wings? According to your staement they would be outside wouldnt they?
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 Well most of the plane disintegrated on impact, which is to be expected from an aluminum plane travelling at 800 km/h hitting a concrete slab, but some wreckage was found, some on the lawn.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked The engines would have made an impact! There would not be hmmmm a hole to fit ..lets say hmmm a missle!
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 I've seen pictures of the engines and very very graphic pictures of the body parts they found. It was a plane and there were definitely people on board.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked I know you are not talking about that SMALL engine shown? That is not a 747 engine! If you dont know that then i guess your the person who says " It was in the newspaper or online so it must be true" You say your not american? well i am and they are full of shit!
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 I believe I know the picture you are referring to and no that is not the engine, it's the turbine cap. There are pictures of the engine casing BTW, which was made of steel and survived the crash.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked These are your words "Well most of the plane disintegrated on impact" Look at any other plane crash, there is no disentergration of the whole plane. you always see evidence there was a plane. Also notice the offices to the left of impact after they made the ceiling collapse (because the missile went right through) you will see paper unsinged, chairs unmoved etc. This is impossible.
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 Yes it disintegrates but obviously not into dust. There was a shit ton of debris, all clearly from a jetliner. Check it out here: watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&feature=related
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked The disintegrating plane theory? 1st time in history planes disintergrated. Shankville you cant see any parts of a plane. the coroner was one of the 1st on the ground said he job was done in 20 min. there was no plane and no bodies. all of the 1st day witnessess all changed the next day. explosions in towers to no explosions yet the towers were turned to dust 1st time in history
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 Wtf are you talking about. They found both engines and the black box and cockpit flight recorders from Flight 97. There was a ton of debris. No HUGE chunks, since it basically hit the earth at a 90 degree angle going the speed of sound, but then what would you expect. Explain to me why the hell the government or whatever other shadow conspiracy would fly two planes into the WTCs, which everyone could see, yet two missiles one into the pentagon and one into Shanksville (??? why exactly
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
) What's the point of that? Isn't it like a billion times easier (if it was a conspiracy) to fly 4 planes???? They did it with the first two why wouldn't they keep some coherency in the 'cover up' story. Why would they allow any speculation it was anything BUT a plane? Use your head for crying out loud.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked seems to me the point is to show there is no big ass jet? Duhhh, p.s. flying 4 planes into buildings "IS" a conspiracy, jeeze, a couple missile's it would still be a conspiracy. every single theory (including) the Govs, is a conspiracy theory. maybe I'm not understanding you?
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 1 year ago
Umm let me try and explain this better.
1) People point out that there is little photographic evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon (this is true)
2) They claim this fact is evidence of a conspiracy.
3) IF IT WAS A CONSPIRACY, there is no advantage whatsoever to using anything BUT a plane at the pentagon. Why would they use a missile at the Pentagon and planes at the WTCs when they could have used planes at every location to make the cover story look better.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
4) If what hit the pentagon was NOT a plane, then yes, it was clearly a conspiracy. But it was orchestrated by the stupidest conspirators in history. They could have used a PLANE and no one would have known!
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked The towers are CLEARLY being pulverized from the top down STEEL & CONCRETE..IMPOSSIBLE this is not falling into itself for the steel supports would remain if it "pancaked" .A Fireman said biggest item found was half a phone pad. This is the real world. Evil is real. WAKE UP!!!
caddy1010 1 year ago
Get your head out of your ass. Go back to school if you have to but learn how to think for yourself. Don't just buy whatever bullshit people make into videos set to creepy background music as fact. You want to prove even the possibility it was a conspiracy to me? Give me 5 FACTS, 5 little pieces of EVIDENCE that it WAS a conspiracy. I hear conspiracy conspiracy conspiracy from you idiots but never any FACTS or real EVIDENCE of one. Somebody must have come out and said they were involved by now.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
if it was a conspiracy. I want hard evidence, not rhetoric. I want ANYTHING concrete, not some retarded interpretation of a grainy video clip. I'm all ears.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked I believe I have given you about 8. Now that I think about it I feel that you are right and I have been wrong! You are a light bearer' and have made me see more clearly. Thank You!
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 Restate the 8! I want concrete evidence of a conspiracy.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
"A Fireman said biggest item found was half a phone pad"
Truthie Sheeple like you will repeat anything, no matter how ludicrous.
Look at any of the aerial photos of Ground Zero -- there are lots of chunks there larger than the pieces of heavy equipment on the site.
Use your head, dipshit.
MsgtSpook 1 year ago
@MsgtSpook I will listen to you and not the fireman who worked there , you are right. Thank You.
caddy1010 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked That makes absoloutely no sense at all.
caddy1010 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked, lol, got ya. all I am saying is all the conspiracy theories, are conspiracy theory. no matter what side you pick, 4 planes, 2 planes w/missiles, 10 guys w/ parachutes? etc. for some reason a lot of people don't understand that 4 planes, the official story, is by definition still a conspiracy theory. just seems funny some people are on one conspiracy, and calling the other "the conspiracy" no matter what happened it was a conspiracy. thats all i'm saying., sorry about that o.k.
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 1 year ago
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 Yes I agree with that. Obviously. But I'm using 'conspiracy' in terms of the shadowy vague diabolical plan hatched by the 'government' or whatever that most people refer to.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked Disintergrating planes? I have never seen a plane crash that didnt look like a plane crash yet it happened twice that day. Never seen a steel building collapse due to fire yet 3 happened that day and 1 didnt get hit by the plane. Yet they were able to "pull it as silverstein said its impossible to do a pro. demolition in 1 day yet u call me retard. You must be an Agent. Get off this corrupt gov. nuts and cont. your tenacious d impressions.
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 Well 'pull' is not an industry term for 'demolition,' it actually means PULL IT DOWN with cranes (yes it was THAT weakened). They wanted to do this to prevent any more damage to the surrounding buildings, but it collapsed before they had a chance. There is video of a firefighter dismayed over the fact that they had been recalled from WTC7. All of the personnel were evacuated, because they were nearly certain the building was going to collapse.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked If it means pull it down with cranes then we can deduce that would also be a lie because we know there were no cranes. B.B.C. reported it down before it went down. You can see the "crump" of the roof sinking in and it coming straight down.
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 Durrrr they were planning on bringing in equipment to bring the building down.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
"If it means pull it down with cranes"
It's only the Truthie Cult that insists Silverstein's comments has anything to do with demo. Both he and the fire chief say they were referring to pulling out the team that had been looking for survivors to evacuate.
MsgtSpook 1 year ago
@MsgtSpook Hey "it" would have to mean people and not a building! I dont know what I was thinking! Thank You for your great wisdom.
caddy1010 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked Also think about this. If the purpose was to kill as many people as possible why didnt they crash into all nuclear sites, like the one down the way from the pentagon?
caddy1010 1 year ago
@caddy1010 A: That wasn't the purpose of the terrorists, (their purpose was to hit symbolic institutions of the USA, Flight 97 was due to hit the Capitol) B: an explosion doesnt set of a nuclear bomb retard, a nuclear reaction does.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
And regarding the taxi cab driver, he admitted he was used. The light pole inside the taxi cab is pretty famous and has been questioned time and time again. Any additional light posts you saw falling around. I have plenty of pictures from news papers of the day and also you can search in the internet. It's free to search. Please save the BS about being there. You are number 9,021,272 stating you were there. A guy that calls himself "fastzman" says he saw the plane's tire hit a car....yep.
LVEbonys 2 years ago
Wait...."Stop commenting on something you didn't see"...Hmmm AND you were there.....
Sr. Can I ask you what is your name nad how come YOU above all the "evidence" exposed have NEVER gone national? YOU actually SAW the tail section?????? Almost complete?
WOW...I have friends in the media that would love to interview you. Please let me know if you are available. You will be doing this country the most valuable contribution in clearing this 911 mess.
I am serious about the media.
LVEbonys