New Footage of WTC7 Collapse (Released 11/1/08)

[IranContraScumDid911]

0:02 to 0:08.5. 570 feet in roughly 6.5 seconds. Not possible from a fire induced mechanical collapse according to the laws of motion. It defys possible limits of gravitational acceleration for a steel structure truncating itself and turnoing to dust. 1/10 of a second of gravitational load resistance for every 10 floors of collapse. The buildings connections would all have to disappear simultaneously to achieve that speed, or use explosives.

[LeWydadi]

this is the most important video of 9/11 and only 14k views???

[changethecurrent]

There must be justice done. Torture is the best option for these scumbags! They must sequel all the names Involved.

[avionicswirenut]

Explosives.....Inside job.....

[MrHangbush]

Check out new 9/11 false flag attack 10 year aniversery video made by A&E truth being released on 9/11 I think. watch?v=yIOC1J44RYw

[idontfkinknow1234]

American citizens, if you do not wake up, realize what has happened and take back control of your country. The people who have pulled off 9/11 and 7/7 WILL continue to kill you. They will kill as many innocent people as necessary to reach their goals. If they decide they need a war with Iran they will detonate a mini nuke in a western capital to create public outrage and support for the war. Wake up and you can put and end to all of this.

[FievelJ69]

What's up with the audio, sounds as though, you fucked something up. What an idiot!

Trying to act smart, and fucked up something on your computer!

Fieve.

[FievelJ69]

Same side as usual. Now how about some video from the opposite side of the building, where the large gash can be seen clearly? Why don't theorists ever show us this side? There's many pictures of it. But I'm sorry to say, I am NOT gonna go search for those 4 u. U say research, so do it on ur own.

Fieve. :(

[morttodd]

Plain fact that any witnesses not in line with the official story were all excluded and gave no testimony.A real evaluation is done when everyone is satisfied with evaluation of the evidence, not simply when one side successfully excludes all other opinions unilaterally.

[phlyegles43]

@morttodd I do not follow the official story because apparently the government is on trial for the acts of September 11th. All I ask for is a list of witnesses that claimed to hearing an explosion on September 11th directly before the collapse of Tower 1 or 2. There are a thousand to one who will tell you they did not hear or see explosions. The other .1% mistakes it with the compromising buildings and the gases built up through the elevator shafts exiting through the basement.

[FievelJ69]

@phlyegles43 you're forgetting something, (The Laws Of Physics Failed That Day) just to prove (Theorists) correct. The explosions were also somehow quiet. And the chemicals to make thermite, were all present, just not all in one place.

LOL.

Rock on, Rock on, or (Rap), and don't let theorists push u around.

Fieve.

[2010pinmaster]

@phlyegles43 gases go up not down!!

[morttodd]

flight 93 was supposed to hit bldg7 to provide cover, the 3rd highest in the complex.

Somehow, it was detained uneectedly, but the bldg had to go having been prepped.

Proof that thermites were used is vids of white hot metal pouring out if bldgs, a smoldering 1000 degree fire, even orange 2000 degree flames cant melt metal white hot at 4000 degrees pour out the bldg under any circumstances. Molten metal incandesence is absolute regardless of which metal it is

[phlyegles43]

@morttodd Molton metal only poured out of one building, this could have been molten aluminum. This molten metal was seen closest to the hottest flames. I am not sure. But I do know if it was thermite it would not be pouring out of the side of the building like that. All the thermite would have to directed toward the melting of the beams. It chaotically combusted and poured out the building there would not be enough power to cut through the vertical beams. No evidence of thermite.

[morttodd]

@phlyegles43

Sorry but you dont know demo & you dont know thermite, no point in attending to your ignorant opinions, cause you have to have hands on to know & you are patently ignorant. IF you had time with it, you'd know that thermite flows & is as such used to weld or destroy depending on how it's deployed.

Tell me about how youd do organ transplant surgery, I mean, you know just as much about that too.

Americans think their uninformed opinion matters rather than facts & experience

[phlyegles43]

@morttodd Obviously you have never seen a controlled demolition or the use of thermite. Thermite has never been used for a controlled demolition. Tests were taken on thermite and steel beams and columns. They found out that even on horizontal beams thermite did not have enough direct energy to make its way through steel to compromise the beams. These were on horizontal beams, not the vertical one either. Its a fact, you cant argue that.

[phlyegles43]

@morttodd

Obviously you dont know how a controlled demolition takes place. Controlled Demolitions collapse the core bringing the exterior of the building into a central point limiting the debris area. IMPLOSION. Look at a few more unbiased videos of the collapse and you will see the perimeter falls first and the core stands for a short while after the perimeter is out of sight. Just because you cant understand the basic principles i'm presenting doesn't mean you can just dismiss them. Shut up.

[morttodd]

@phlyegles43

What I know about construction, demo, chemisty and physics can fill books. Paid for by our uncle suga. I DID have to pay for the uniforms.

Plain fact is no skyscrapers have ever fallen from fire. Zip zero nada. Plenty ways to demo a bldg, depends on how you want to do it.

Just one intentional lie proves conspiracy, just one.

Two kinds of lies, omission OR commission. Either will do it

[phlyegles43]

@morttodd

You say just fires, like they were normal office fires. You forget the part about the 757s crashing into the building. Key core columns and perimeter columns were damaged along ten floors. Thats ten floors of damage along with burning jet fuels. You forget the fact that the largest controlled demolition was a quarter the size of tower one and two. There are many ways to demo it but only one way would have worked you did not want to avoid suspicion.

[phlyegles43]

@morttodd Not to mention the fact that the thermite was seen in the perimeter columns. You would have to strip down the column and place the charge in the middle of an active office without anyone in the office noticing.

[smujismuj]

They left the sound off in this video.

There are other youtube videos with the sound attached.

You can hear faintly the sound of an explosion just before it drops, uniformly straight down at FREE FALL speed.

That has now been acknowledged by NIST, try as they did to spin it, they just couldn't carry on the ruse that is so easily debunked.

[chaosad09]

Its funny how the government can make up a rediculous story that sounds like a mid 80s B rated aciton movie with plot holes you could fly a 757/767 through, and all the homer simpsons of the world believe every word of it. But if you show these same idiots some actual evidence that contradicts what they were told, they call you a dimwit. They say Popular Mehcanics magazine says your wrong. LOL!!! I for one trust my own eyes and common sence over bullshit any day.

[chessinfantry]

there was 3rd plane that hit the base of wtc7 that the media covered up

[MJ4ever911]

Lol the WTC 7 was not the only building damage. Indeed the building "Bankers Trust" was extremely damaged too. It didn't collapse, but it had to be demolish.

[scoretosettle]

yesblownupforsure

[dawgggystyle]

Smaller buildings one block over are built better than taller buildings 2 blocks over? You are retarded. Plus, what proof are you talking about? there is nothing in the 9/11 commission report, the ignored it all together. seems odd doesn't it. once again, you're dumb

[amy2x]

The original building #7 fires were started by explosions. One plane did not show up to hit building #7 but it still had to come down. 

[musarman]

Demolition. They Live, we Sleep. That's why they dare..

[nadoeloiskat]

there's too many twoofers who knows that this was the inside job.. but you'll never get the official anouncement that it was. because your pitiful foliohats does not help shit.

[deec269]

False Flag = Coup

[Ne0mega]

"This wasn't a controlled demolition."

"This wasn't a controlled demolition."

"These aren't the droids you are looking for."

"These aren't the droids we are looking for."

"Consume more to fight terrorism."

"Let's amass more debt to fight terrorism."

"move along"

"let's move on."

[ELONut]

hey, that was nearly as good a demolition as the twin towers controlled collapse

[sensless1mc]

theirs a flash between 5 and 6 sec.

[morpheus341]

Nice detonation. Congratulaion Mr. Bush.

[BitOnkel]

marinus COULD have done it alone :) but i don´t you it and you don´t know it... what happened after this is know

[BitOnkel]

you are right but it´s not sure if it was a false flag or just an attack by a crazy dutch communist what was taken as base for the Enabling act :) but 9/11 was an inside job (false flag) yes

[1enzeder]

When something looks like shit and smells like shit... It's shit. What you are suffering from is called cognitive dissonance. What that means is, though you witness a controlled demolition with your own eyes, your mind will rationalize any alternative explanation of events in order for you to believe anything other than what you have actually seen. THIS IS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. what you see here is not a tower of childrens toy blocks. It is a lightly clad web of welded construction steel

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder interesting how you overlook the other video here on youtube that shows the penthouse of #7 collapsing 10 seconds before the rest of the bldg does

also interesting that there isn't a single video with any audio of squibs or even a single video showing a succession of explosions like you seen in ANY other video showing a demolition

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham The fact that the penthouse implodes, reveals the engineered obliteration of the central core necessary for implosion. Quickly followed by global, catastrophic, UNIFORM, unimpeded freefall of the entire structure. Even if it were necessary to see evidence of squibs, (watch?v=Ul3Eia4jPCM&feature=r­elated), Stephen Jones found military grade thermite residue all over the city. Try finding video, shot close enough to 7 to capture explosions with ANY audio. Wake up.

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder the fact that the penthouse caves in LONG before the rest of the collapse is proof that the bldg fell in from a weak structure after hours of burning - not an instantaneous collapse like a demolition

the video you linked to is a close up of windows shattering after then collapse starts

there are no videos of squibs - no audio either

if it looks like a duck? what was the rest you said?

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham If you see a building that collapsed because of a couple of burning office chairs on a couple of the 47 floors, then I withdraw my previous advice to wake up and say go back to sleep. You are of no use.

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder well there's the problem - you have told yourself so much fantasy and lies you'll believe anything

a couple of chairs?

what a joke - I guess you misse the bldg that fell on wtc7 - because the rest of us saw a 1000 ft of concrete fall

and then some 9 hours of fires on several floors?I am no use to a nut job douche for sure

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham You're right! I did not see the 1000 foot wall that hit 7, please direct me to your source material.

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder see that explains it, you somehow missed what the rest of the world witnessed

watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham I'm sorry, where is this 1,000 foot piece of debris in this video? did it magically vaporize after doing the alleged damage along with the pancaked floors of 1and2? This demonstrates how the weak minded are herded like the gullible sheep they are.The video begins by showing the devastation of 3,4 and 5. It then shows the superficial damage of 7 and has the nerve to make the absurd statement "The worst damage was obscured by smoke" . Recently released near-side images reveal no damage

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder wow, weak minded? an amazing insult coming from a twoofer - in the video, there is a shot looking down at the destruction spanning over many acres

of course the destruction of the marriott and towers 3,4,5,6

5 bldgs destroyed by? superficial damage? wtc 7 was only 300 feet away

I'm sorry, you have pics showing no damage? really? care to share those urls? or just wanna keep making stuff up

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham I've tried to help you, but you're on your own.

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder thank god

you avoided every question

avoided every point

and you have to, inorder to stay in your little make believe twoofer world

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham I could keep responding to your endless jabbering, however it is not my job to educate the willfully ignorant. Anyone genuinely interested in the truth can verify anything I have referenced for themselves, as if the above video was was not enough for all but the most severely brain damaged. Now for the third time, goodbye, I'm not a saint,I can only tolerate the profoundly witless for so long.

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham I'm surprised. While you appear completely unable to see that 9/11 was a staged event designed to steal America by nullifying the US constitution, on the other hand it seems you are alert to the fact that the climate change nonsense is a fraud. I had assumed you were one of these up to the eye-balls in thimerosal, 40 hour a week tv watching, sponge-brain 18 year olds, incapable of questioning the media sewerage stream. Credit where credit's due.

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder watching the news is a huge waste of time - although we'll never agree about this twoofer biz, we can agree on that

Its not about being willfully ignorant - its just about evidence - and there is none - another problem is - there is no clear cut conspiracy - it changes depending on the nut - ie:

a plane hit the bldg but it was a govt plane, or? it was a cruise missile, or? there wasn't either- all the footage was faked, or? it was squibs? or it was thermite, or?

[wkwickham]

@wkwickham how about motive? thats where it gets funny

this was false flag to go to war for oil,? or to make Larry S rich,? there was gold in the basement,? or Larry S wanted to collect insurance money,? or it was a coverup to destroy some other evidence in WTC7, or yours, which is to take rights away,? oh yea an attack by israel to get us to kill muslims

that one is priceless

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham There is nothing new about corrupting an organization,a movement or an idea by flooding the landscape with lunacy. It's called cointelpro, Its been around since the 50's and the CIA have written manuals for it.That is why we must establish and stick to the facts. inventing scenario's about how and why is speculation. There are lots of questions like the ones mention, such as How were explosives rigged?We will never know until we can subpeona the likes of marvin bush,silverstein,cheney

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham But if I was to speculate, I would say guys like Silverstein would be the easiest to control. You wouldn't need to make him rich, He was already rich. But if you gave him the option between removing the asbestos in 3 sky-scrapers with 30% tenancy or keeping his mouth shut and going along,I think that would do it. I would also point out that loose change was made by a young guy with a camcorder and a pc in his bedroom who is merely questioning some inconsistencies. . .

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham . . . He freely acknowledges the film includes some personal interpretation of events. We are not talking about film making organizations like history channel or popular mechanics with the capacity to fund research at major engineering schools. Regardless of speculation as to motive, the direct outcome has been, illegal invasions, caspian sea oil line, patriot act and the stripping of personal liberty in America with no end to the decline in sight.

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder hey, you still havent commented on bldg 3,4,5,6 they were all destroyed too - and yet the twoofers don't mention them - I wonder why

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham You really need to stop eating the tooth paste, that much fluoride is not good for you. Because you are clearly not capable of the most elementary processes of critical thought, I will waste just a little more of my time out of my deep sympathy for your pitiful condition, to assist you. The other buildings were damaged, and did not collapse as they were struck by material ejected with explosive force from 1 and 2. recently released images of the near side of 7 reveal no such damage.

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham ... video evidence and testimony (unless you are going to believe NIST, who have been embarrassed concerning near side damage, or Larry Silverstein) show very limited fire. Now, hush little baby... Rock-a-bye baby on the tree top...when the wind blows...

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder funny, the video footage here shows multiple raging fires

watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

[1enzeder]

@wkwickham Yes that would be a serious fire, if it was in your house, or trailer, or dumpster. But is was in a confined region of 2 floors in a 47 floor steel building. Also, as with low level propaganda employed in the other video you sited, you have shown yourself very suggestible, having a very underdeveloped capacity for discriminating thinking(normal, if you are a teenager)as you assume, based on a few seconds of footage that this was typical for the whole day with no evidence either way.

[wkwickham]

@1enzeder bahhh low level propaganda - and loose change? you bought hook line and sinker

you have evidence that can even come close to refuting that video - none - so you resort to weak insults - really pathetic

you continously duck the real question - please provide video evidence - WITH AUDIO that documents anything resembling squibs

don't have it? then you have blind faith in something that doesnt have evidence

tool

[CriticalBanana]

@1enzeder All I see is smoke from the fire inside the building escaping from the windows as they break. What else did you expect would happen when it fell down? If anything thios prove it wasn't pulled because we now have various shot of this collapse from both sides and not a charge to be seen or heard.

[phlyegles43]

@1enzeder Ive witnessed many controlled demolitions. Wheres the explosion that could be heard from a mile away?

[colombiaje]

@phlyegles43 This video has not audio you idiot! LOLLLLLLLLL

[phlyegles43]

@colombiaje

Feel free to look up every video and audio clip of the collapse and you will still hear zero explosions.

[colombiaje]

@phlyegles43 actually there are many videos that have sound and you CAN hear a faint boom before the building collapses, the NIST released these videos and there is countless more evidence/testimonies that was not included in the final 911 commission.

[phlyegles43]

@colombiaje There are many videos where you can hear a FAINT boom. I suggest you look up some controlled demolitions to see how "faint" there explosions are. These faint booms are much more likely to be a multiple of other things rather than an explosion. The largest building ever demoed was a fourth the size of towers one and two and had much weaker supports. The building failed at the perimeter, not the core. Unlike a controlled demolition. Where are these countless testimonies?

[colombiaje]

@phlyegles43 Look up "firemen talk about explosions wtc" thats one of the recently re-released videos by the NIST. This one alone with dozens more were withheld from the public for years and were only made available du to a FOIA claim, it took the government NINE years to release them.

[phlyegles43]

@colombiaje None of these "explosions" they claim of hearing would have enough power. Not to mention the fact that no explosions are seen. Not to mention the building collapsed at the perimeter not the core. Not one explosion was seen where the building failed. These explosions were heard after impact, not before collapse. Explosions take place before collapse. Theres no way to demo that building without an explosion that would be heard across the Hudson. Its a fact.

[colombiaje]

@phlyegles43 If the core comes down so does the perimeter...as for explosions occurring only before the collapse that is a load of bull, I urge you to see the videos where the firemen/reporters are saying how they saw the building being leveled by explosions then again judging from your comments you seem close minded on the issue. Just continue believing what the government tells you because they love you and care about you.

[phlyegles43]

@colombiaje The perimeter of the building fell first. UNLIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. In every collapse video you will see the core standing while the perimeter collapses. If you can provide me with these testimonies with witness names and comments I will believe you. But a video does not mean anything. There are people who dont even know that planes hit the tower. The day was chaotic and no one had a clue about was going on. From your comments you seem close minded and stupid.

[colombiaje]

@phlyegles43 Barry Jennings,Scott Forbes, William Rodriguez, COUNTLESS NEWSREPORTERS. Do some research and please dont call me stupid it just shows your immaturity and lack of substance in your posts seeing that you can not use evidence to support your opinions...

[phlyegles43]

@colombiaje You named two witnesses... Do I need to explain to you how chaotic September 11th is and in chaotic scenes facts are misinterpreted. You say I dont use evidence but I have in every one of my arguments which shows that you have difficulties even making up false accusations. Do I need to show you the videos before the collapse where no explosions take place. Youtube doesn't count as research by the way. You still have not argued one of my points so that shows your lack of substance.

[colombiaje]

@phlyegles43 I named three witnesses and thats not including the dozens of reporters on that day that spoke of explosions. But im sure there accounts dont matter its what the government tells you. You like all other zombies just go with the crowd because you are afraid to do you some freethinking that is critical thinking based off of your own observations not others. Look at what the US got out of 911, WAR a war that they called for in the PNAC document which im sure you never even heard of.

[phlyegles43]

@colombiaje

Oh Three Witnesses... Are you serious, if explosions were heard that were capable of destroying the key support columns a thousand witnesses would have came forward. You call me a zombie and and that im not a freethinker. I haven't read the 9/11 commission or the NIST report. I have studied the structural analysis of the building along with demolitions and explosives to find zero similarities.What we got out of war was debt, good theory though...

[phlyegles43]

@colombiaje If you care to reply use actual substance rather than just calling me names and calling me a zombie. Theres no reason to debate if your incapable of doing and to reason with common fact.

[misterbuckethead]

@1enzeder and your proof is??? 

[peapod8]

Smoking gun. Irrefutable. Now, let's take down the traitors. ... Or are we just going to let them get away with it?

[BakersBoyz]

Command boss Gen. Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 2007 safety standdown in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in which six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and then flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., without anyone on the ground or bomber realizing the nuclear weapons were on the plane. It was not until the B-52H was parked at Barksdale that ground crews discovered the cruise missiles were carrying real warheads.

[wkwickham]

@BakersBoyz true, you left out the part where numerous air force personel lost their jobs due to this though

it was taken very seriously by the air force

[1gooddevil]

inside job.

[Gilgamesh73]

Technically it's called a false flag. Read this great article: 

dailypaul. com/node/46285

[MrBrownns]

@1gooddevil the collapse of the other two buidling had such a force and rubble falling down that it made the WTC 7 fall

[dawgggystyle]

@MrBrownns you're dumb. why did WTC5 and WTC6 still stand when they were closer to WTC1 and WTC2 than WTC7 ????

[MrBrownns]

@dawgggystyle dude the airplane and building parts flew a few miles away when hit and the WTC 7 could have been hit by something or not built as well as the others. u needa do some research see the event live right next to you and stop making retarded theorys that have no meaning when ppl have already proved that they are wrong. idiots.

[777thefreedomfighter]

@1gooddevil how about this 1Gilgadevilgoodmesh777 >>> (false flag inside job mega ritual) you certainly can not ignore the numerolgy 1, 9,11 and 13 and setting fire the Pentagon (pentagram).G.W. Bush was synchronizing witchcraft during the sacrificial mega ritual of 9 eleven.

[Bumblebee303]

Hang both !

[jepedoelph]

what a great video of a demolition....wonder who set the charges?

[TEARDUCTER]

great video

*****

[buceriasbo]

hanging zionist traitors is not anti-semitec!