as i watch i keep wanting to hit the thumbs up but i already did thank you so much is all i can say i am 26 and have been so lost thank you thank you thank you
The UK is the equivalent of Racist towards men. Feminism is much worse there then America. Western women are more evil than any other people in the world. I made the decision a long time ago to marry an Asian.
@DoItYouWont100 Women are evil no man has ever been able to really win an argument you suffer in one way or another. They're demonic and only understand power and have us by the balls because we need them at the same time. Need the affection and love that comes when you establish dominance. The reason women couldn't vote was to maintain household unity. The man voted the way both of them wanted because if he didn't he had to suffer like man does every waking moment today.
I knew a guy who got beaten by his girlfriend (he went into work with a cast on his leg) yet he was arrested and taken to court for domestic violence as well as banned from his house and the town he lives in, so he also lost his job.
@JGrayshon No punishment without getting convicted? That has been thrown out the window a long time ago. Ths UK government is like a capitalist version of the USSR. We now live in a police state.
being a bachlor will be citied as violence against a woman. sexing her with a big dick will be citied as a violent act against a woman. being homosexual will be a violent act against a woman. having to many male children will be a form of a violent act against a woman. the list can go on and on. women have officially become more trouble than they're worth.
That's a bit ridiculous. I mean, if the genders were reversed... Well, even with what they are currently. If both parties don't consent, it shouldn't happen.
Has there been a single case where a man was put in jail or was forced to pay a fine for criticizing a woman's appearance or sending her unwanted gifts? I mean, this is educational and all, but I just don't believe this is being enforced nearly enough to warrant concern.
@KaizerNail The problem with the all-encompassing definition of domestic abuse, is not men being put in jail for something silly. The real problem, is that a judge or the police, for example, can use a woman's accusations of 'abuse' against a man (shouting, slamming doors,ignoring her etc) when making decisions like refusing him custody of his children, issuing a restraining order or deciding if he will be evicted from his own home. When 'abuse' is everything, it's a cumulative assault on men.
@manwomanmyth The state now has the right to control and destroy men for doing the smallest thing. Holding woman to the same standards, you could get her done for nagging.
@KaizerNail - lol what a dumb fuck you are, trying to come up with excuses for the blindingly obvious facts presented in this video. Google "domestic violence" and click on some of the web pages - id say approximately 95% of them are aimed at women.... now my wife said I didnt look good in my shoes yesterday - I was a victim of domestic violence, where is my cushy desk job and massive divorce settlement?
Notice how the list only uses the words 'she' or 'her' and never 'your partner' or 'your spouse'
Because men are always the abusers? I wouldn't be surprised if a man is charged with domestic violence because he reacted to his spouse's abuse in anger.
im in a domestic violence class. i'm embarrassed to admit But it is the DUMBEST fucking course iv ever had to take. the teacher is highly hypocritical, Saying you shouldn't deny her sex cause ur denying her sexuality. everything on that list and more is true, but if a man wants sex your told the woman doesn't have to supply it cause it's her body... HOW are men expected to take anything when there's that level of self contradictory going on!? At least if were being bullshitted be consistent!
Apparently a woman can FEEL like she is about to be raped if a man says "hello" to her on the street. I am sure a husband can to go jail nowadays for saying something for clenched teeth. As long as she FEELS like it is violent. We all know how the government stands at attention to her feelings.
wow i used to always say that i would never want to have daughters cuz us women have such a tough life but...all this new crazy stuff with misandry is rapidly changing my mind....
In my school ( in Australia ) , it is socially acceptable to critique the refugee policy , the carbon tax , communism etc. But when it comes to making a critique on feminism ( through rational argument ) I am somehow a criminal. A criminal of thought? Sound familiar?
But you western men are the ones who allow it to happen. I also blame you the Men. Why don't you just avoid those western women like a plague. Just Don't marry them, it's better to stay single if you're man living in the West. You can have kids with them and the only thing you'll have to pay is child support but don't marry those skanks
Feminism does not exist in the circles of the elite men who run the world- it's a tool used against the common man.
There are two ways to take over a society, by force or by economic subterfuge. Subterfuge however requires distraction, confusion, and instability as cover.
Transforming a natural patriarchy into an artificial matriarchy weakens and destabilizes any cultural, making it easy prey for takeover. No men, no force of arms, no real resistance.
Not only can the common man no longer be a man in a relatonship, pieces are falling into place where he can no longer even be human, with human actions and reactions.
@ropowerman To be honest I wish I was gay bro. But not the butterfly kind of gay surrounded by female friends, no. Like myself but with another normal dude that'd be my gay boyfriend.
I appreciate a lot of your content, but those 'creative' domestic violence definitions are from a defunct website and nearly ten years old. The current definitions of violence on the major governmental and women's charity websites are far more sensible and acknowledge violence as a potentially bi-directional.
@HorridFroth For a "straw man" argument, how is it that one of those "creative" definitions from a "defunct" website "nearly 10 years old" are now passing into law as I write this?
Do you think that the individuals and agencies behind such drivel simply packed up and disappeared after the project was over?
What you are trying to play down is the obvious extent to which those definitions from the recent past inform public policy today. Hence my whole series on DV.
It's a shame you interpreted it that way. As I said, I like a lot of your content.
Which of those definitions is passing into law?
My use of quotes on the word creative was a means of paraphrasing 'overblown feminist wacko nonsense', not a way of being confrontational. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Your use of quotes on my (accurate) terms 'defunct' and 'nearly ten years old' WAS confrontational.
I'm sure we're on the same side, but maybe not communicating effectively.
Reflecting, I take it that the recent judgement which extends the definition of abuse to verbal abuse is the one you're referring to? If one can read past the Mail's trivialisation of the content of the ruling, then it all seems perfectly fair to me. Additionally, that factsheet from 2002 is, I think, intended to portray a spectrum of behaviours that could constitute abuse. Individually, they can be seen as petty and facile, but as part of a wider gestalt of behaviour, they can be abusive...
@HorridFroth In one comment, you say "overblown feminist wacko nonsense". In another you say you understand the intention behind such nonsense. You clearly don't and we are clearly not on the same side as regards Feminism or indeed, sanity.
Another great video. Just shows how far we have fallen. You want to know why the world is in decline? Because the world doesn't want strong men. These women who have gotten into power want to emasculate and vilify men so they become weak and submissive. And frankly, the women just don't have the ability to make up for the lack of these strong male influences in the world today. According to the world at large, if you are a strong, independent male, you are evil and must be "reeducated".
@awesome9001 From the British crime survey 1999 (confirmed in 2000) "4.2% of women and 4.2% of men said they had been physically assaulted by a current or former partner in the last year".
If shouting at your spouse is domestic violence, then shouting at your kids is child abuse. The government is seriously disfunctional and I'm starting to think the anarchists may be onto something.
The info in this video is old. The latest "Statistic" I've seen quoted by Feminists (no source given of course) is that 1 in 3 women are sexually abused by the time they're 18. Such a high number couldn't be committed by a few perpetrators, so the implication is clear. All men are either abusers or indifferent to abuse of women. (Obviously women aren't considered abusers.) Soon it will be 1 in 2 then 100%. Feminists will find a way to expand upon the definition of abuse to include all women.
@Quintapus I give it 2 more years before a government agency declares that, as you say, ALL women suffer DV at the hands of their male partners.
Remember Dworkin and the idea that ALL heterosexual intercourse is (essentially) rape? Soon ALL heterosexual relationships will be classed as abusive. I wonder, how clear does it need to be to see that government and Feminism are becoming identical?
Am I the only one that noticed that that long list is a more accurate psychological profile of the evil schemes that women do against men in almost all relationships? Saying hurtful things, taking his money, screaming at him, preventing him from sleeping, enforcing a routine, insulting him, threatens to report him to the authorities? This kind of shit is the sort of evil manipulative conniving shit that women always do against men! Feminism is officially Organized Sexism on par with Neo-Nazism.
I saw "restricting her movements" on the list of "domestic violence"; but consider a crawling or toddling baby, who is by nature quite the explorer, would it not be an inexcusable irresponsibility to allow the child unrestricted movement?
Consider also streets, bodies of water, construction zones, animal-yards. Simply put not restricting the movement of a small child is inviting injury or death.
The size of that list is enormous, I dont think you could be in a relationship without doing somthing on the list. Kinda sad, makes somthing that should be taken seriously into a joke. I guess we all know that the real reason the list is so big is to make the umbrella encompassing "domestic violence" as big as possible to sustain the bogus statistics which of course means prolonged and even expanded funding. What a cycle...
@cmiller8492 Exactly. Everyone is guilty and everyone is a criminal. It's just down to the state to decide when to target you for it. All men are in a perpetual state of being guilty of crimes against women, and the axe over our heads just follows us around until some woman or some agency decides to bring it down.
I think it is important to widen the definition of domestic abuse deemed criminal, as is happening, in order to protect men from those acts. Why would MRAs object to more protection from abusive females? MRAs should be focusing their attentions on getting prosecutions of women for domestic abuse through the courts, so the media can have a debate about the way women treat men - and the henpecking or worst forms of psychological abuse which are no longer acceptable. Time to get ahead of the game.
@tom181071 Great in principle, but as I've covered in the DV films, for a multitude of reasons, these "protections" are not available to men and to the extent to which they are, men will not apply them. It is not in men's nature, in general, to make use of such provisions. Further the legal system is not inclined to support men in any area of DV.
The question is, is engaging with this stacked-game, this legal framework which is bad for everyone but especially bad for men, the way forward?
@manwomanmyth The multitude of reasons these protections are not currently being taken up by men, need to be challenged. If 'men's nature' is part of the lag - then this should be criticized, along with criticizing any structural obstacles, and female/feminist/antifeminist refusals too.
Women use 4 times more hostile sexist speech than men. It is abuse. It does have negative consequences. Misandry is in all our natures, but we learn not to use it by being policed, culturally and legally.
@tom181071 I agree in part. But if this challenge means accepting that shouting is DV, we'll be capitulating to the idea that ALL relationships are abusive.
Sometimes it's best to refuse to accept the playing field defined by those whose only interest is SELF-interest. Why should we all become grist for their mill and give more work to lawyers, social workers and divorce courts over behaviours that are normal?
I think that jumping in to this mess (and thereby validating it) is the wrong move.
Speaking maliciously, should be deemed criminal. Professional, stubborn, victim-feminist rhetoric, which deliberately refuses to reflect facts, in effect disparaging men - flak - should be considered crime against humanity. Fascist dictatorships start at home, where 90% of men are subservient - a lot taking abuse with orders. The home, is where human's right to dignity must be protected. MRAs need to catalogue relational misandry to test in court. A few test cases deter a million acts of abuse.
@tom181071 I'm in two minds about this. I agree about "flak" and also agree that women do not face sanction for their verbal abuse (nor, generally, for their physical abuse).
However, court cases just feed the system. They won't fix relationships, they'll destroy them.
Maybe relations between men and women do need some kind of root-and-branch fix, but the law has no interest in this entire area besides criminalising men. As Erin Pizzey has said, we need to get the law OUT of domestic violence.
@manwomanmyth Get the law out, by identifying abusive relationships in a compulsory yearly, two minute phone interview with each partner, and each child, with a lie detector - to identify abuses, and verify them, to reduce them - so if divorce is later filed for, and it can be shown the woman uses psychological abuse, or parental alienation etc, it can be argued she is therefore less fit to parent, and will receive less custody - a strong deterrent for abusive henpeckers to evolve their ways.
... You know, I seriously do wonder if it's going to come down to a civil war or something between men and women. I mean, you can't talk to them, you can't put them in their place on an intellectual level because anything you say is outright evil and hateful.. So what would they do when the men, mindless physical creatures as they've classed us all it seems, revolt and start a real physical confrontation over the matter? Not saying it should happen, just that it seems we're going that way now.
@manwomanmyth Mmm. I never said there would be a winner. I just said that eventually buttons are going to end up being pushed and someone's going to blow their stack at some point in time. While THAT is real violence, and deserves to be pointed out as such with shame towards the one(s) that do commit it, could you blame them? I hope it never has to happen and both feminists and MRA supporters can sit down and evenly talk.. but then, I also have hopes for hearing a weather report of Hell frozen.
@digiviceboy Hm. Do you really think that this is about Feminists and MRA's sitting down and talking? I am not attacking you here, just pointing out that "MRA" and "Feminist" are not equal and opposite as you seem to suggest here. However, a lot of people think this and I intend to do a film bout this misunderstanding as it is very damaging to our aspirations for human rights when we believe that Feminism is simply a valid viewpoint or arguing position rather than the toxic ideology it is.
@manwomanmyth No, not equal, but the /people in the movements and followings/ are equal, which is where I'm expecting a sit down and chat. It's quite obvious women have equal rights in Western society; Damn near even more rights, superfluously. That's not right, nor fair, but of course, Feminists would like it all their way. Greedy is as greedy does. I'm not thinking of Feminist or MRA as equal nor above each other, but everybody needs to get their facts straight and understand what real
On the suicide issue: If its used to guilt-trip your spouse, or bait for sympathy, it makes sense. So, I don't really think "attempting" suicide should be domestic abuse, so much as "threatening" suicide.
this society is evil and sick and by watching this video does prove that it realy hates men. we are in deep shit!!!! time to stand up for yourselves!!!!
men are retarded for getting into relationships with women .. just fuck them and move on. give them nothing, never let them move in. never get married ........... most men are such losers ...
@mikesomething No, your attitude here could be seen as equally "retarded". Having sex and moving on has it's own severe risks. The problem here is not "men" (nor in the final analysis) is it "women". The real problem is those who are using women against men.
@fistoffries Women are Abominations. They cause misery and pain, they do not serve a purpose. They abuse us, make more money and keep us down while they complain about us! We should create artificial wombs and be done with them!
Kill your mothers, sister, daughters, all females in your family. We will keep some, they will be sterilized and used as domestic servants and fuck slaves. The oppression of men must end!
Wait, so we are not allowed to (within reason) exhibit normal human behavior?
I don't condone abuse or physical and emotional harm, but this basically tells men that they are not allowed to be a human being. The "Bringing her unwanted gifts" one was by far the most ridiculous.
I am a violent man, and I am angry at my girlfriend, the angriest I've ever been, so when she gets home, boy, am I going to criticise her appearance, laugh at her, and not give her any money, grrrrrrr :)
Wow. The British government, and subsequently the British legal system actually think that these are legitimate forms of domestic violence? I feel sorry for English men.
@MrCombatveteran what'll bring her to reality even quicker is if the cops in her district dont do jack-squat to enforce the law she is trying to activate. if she is professionally ignored, not taken seriously, shunned, and eventually disbarred, that'll wake her and everybody else up. public humiliation and professional embasrrassment is a good route to go. from the sounds of it, she's got the same root feature all such feminists have ... a massive ego; which will crush her when it is broken.
@paragshah2112 If only. The fact is, the police WILL enforce this because, perversely , it's "good" for them too. Dear Brenda is no fool, she knows that she is scratching many backs with such vile judgments. It's only the people who lose.
@m i was thinking about this vid for some time yesterday. i realized something else about the intent behind allowing this kind of sillyness to pass as 'violence'. what it allows women to do now, is "defend" themselves against it with impunity. if a man calls her a bitch, and she reacts physically violent, she can then say she was defending herself against violence. if a man did such a thing, he'd burn at the stake. what this law is meant to do, is institute a modern day caste system. nefarious.
@paragshah2112 Very, very good point. I didn't think about that in this way. Shouting and hitting have legally gained equivalence, but only in favour of women, of course.
If a man shouts at a woman and she hits him, he's an abuser.
If a woman shouts at a man and he hits her, he's an abuser.
Balance the definition of domestic violence with an increasing demand from women for "dominant" men - a term they use borrowed from alternative culture.
I can't help but notice that the list only said "she", and never "he" or "him", as if men can't be the victim of domestic violence.
The world we live in can be mindblowingly idiotic sometimes.
Datasint 1 month ago
as i watch i keep wanting to hit the thumbs up but i already did thank you so much is all i can say i am 26 and have been so lost thank you thank you thank you
CodyWest88 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The UK is the equivalent of Racist towards men. Feminism is much worse there then America. Western women are more evil than any other people in the world. I made the decision a long time ago to marry an Asian.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
So if I win an argument with my GF, then I've committed domestic violence? Unbelievable.
DoItYouWont100 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DoItYouWont100 Women are evil no man has ever been able to really win an argument you suffer in one way or another. They're demonic and only understand power and have us by the balls because we need them at the same time. Need the affection and love that comes when you establish dominance. The reason women couldn't vote was to maintain household unity. The man voted the way both of them wanted because if he didn't he had to suffer like man does every waking moment today.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
I knew a guy who got beaten by his girlfriend (he went into work with a cast on his leg) yet he was arrested and taken to court for domestic violence as well as banned from his house and the town he lives in, so he also lost his job.
JGrayshon 4 months ago 4
@JGrayshon No punishment without getting convicted? That has been thrown out the window a long time ago. Ths UK government is like a capitalist version of the USSR. We now live in a police state.
brownie1982ad 1 week ago
Soon, living on the same planet as a woman will be an act of domestic violence.
TheRealJawnz 4 months ago 6
being a bachlor will be citied as violence against a woman. sexing her with a big dick will be citied as a violent act against a woman. being homosexual will be a violent act against a woman. having to many male children will be a form of a violent act against a woman. the list can go on and on. women have officially become more trouble than they're worth.
smoking1212 5 months ago 4
"Refusing to have sex with her"
That's a bit ridiculous. I mean, if the genders were reversed... Well, even with what they are currently. If both parties don't consent, it shouldn't happen.
TropChuette 5 months ago
Has there been a single case where a man was put in jail or was forced to pay a fine for criticizing a woman's appearance or sending her unwanted gifts? I mean, this is educational and all, but I just don't believe this is being enforced nearly enough to warrant concern.
KaizerNail 6 months ago
@KaizerNail The problem with the all-encompassing definition of domestic abuse, is not men being put in jail for something silly. The real problem, is that a judge or the police, for example, can use a woman's accusations of 'abuse' against a man (shouting, slamming doors,ignoring her etc) when making decisions like refusing him custody of his children, issuing a restraining order or deciding if he will be evicted from his own home. When 'abuse' is everything, it's a cumulative assault on men.
manwomanmyth 5 months ago 10
@manwomanmyth I know a man forced to go on a course for shouting at a woman nagging at him.
brownie1982ad 1 week ago
@manwomanmyth The state now has the right to control and destroy men for doing the smallest thing. Holding woman to the same standards, you could get her done for nagging.
brownie1982ad 1 week ago
@KaizerNail - lol what a dumb fuck you are, trying to come up with excuses for the blindingly obvious facts presented in this video. Google "domestic violence" and click on some of the web pages - id say approximately 95% of them are aimed at women.... now my wife said I didnt look good in my shoes yesterday - I was a victim of domestic violence, where is my cushy desk job and massive divorce settlement?
GoVir4l 2 weeks ago
now a man can't be in relationships without being labelled "a violent animal"
TrueBlueCanuck 6 months ago
@TrueBlueCanuck I call my man a "violent animal" in the bedroom...not that I'm complaining ;)
ElanaVital83 6 months ago
Notice how the list only uses the words 'she' or 'her' and never 'your partner' or 'your spouse'
Because men are always the abusers? I wouldn't be surprised if a man is charged with domestic violence because he reacted to his spouse's abuse in anger.
RangerJackWalker 6 months ago 3
Anyone heard of Problem, Reaction, Solution?
It's where they claim to have the solution to the problems that they themselves have created in the first place.
Amaguqas 6 months ago
im in a domestic violence class. i'm embarrassed to admit But it is the DUMBEST fucking course iv ever had to take. the teacher is highly hypocritical, Saying you shouldn't deny her sex cause ur denying her sexuality. everything on that list and more is true, but if a man wants sex your told the woman doesn't have to supply it cause it's her body... HOW are men expected to take anything when there's that level of self contradictory going on!? At least if were being bullshitted be consistent!
wetdream09 6 months ago 6
6:14 ..'making her eat inedible and or disgusting things.." LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrBastilleDay 6 months ago
Apparently a woman can FEEL like she is about to be raped if a man says "hello" to her on the street. I am sure a husband can to go jail nowadays for saying something for clenched teeth. As long as she FEELS like it is violent. We all know how the government stands at attention to her feelings.
MrBastilleDay 6 months ago 2
wow i used to always say that i would never want to have daughters cuz us women have such a tough life but...all this new crazy stuff with misandry is rapidly changing my mind....
patriciacarrasco 6 months ago
@patriciacarrasco It's not just women, it's not just men. It's PEOPLE. Living on this planet is ridiculously impossible.
ElanaVital83 6 months ago
@ElanaVital83 To that I agree.
blacktigerpaw1 5 months ago
In my school ( in Australia ) , it is socially acceptable to critique the refugee policy , the carbon tax , communism etc. But when it comes to making a critique on feminism ( through rational argument ) I am somehow a criminal. A criminal of thought? Sound familiar?
ropowerman 6 months ago 2
If these men were so bad to these women , what stops them from leaving?
If you are a woman crying there's male lifeforms all the way in distant galaxies who are willing to help you.
If you are a man....well you look after yourself..... )=
ropowerman 6 months ago
@ropowerman Wat
blacktigerpaw1 6 months ago
Man, you'd do well to not watch Doctor Phil.
Neofcon 6 months ago
But you western men are the ones who allow it to happen. I also blame you the Men. Why don't you just avoid those western women like a plague. Just Don't marry them, it's better to stay single if you're man living in the West. You can have kids with them and the only thing you'll have to pay is child support but don't marry those skanks
wamnicho 6 months ago
We are now doomed economically so this insanity will change
AlvinSawdust 6 months ago
@AlvinSawdust Women,we don't miss the water till the well dries out!
AlvinSawdust 6 months ago
Feminism does not exist in the circles of the elite men who run the world- it's a tool used against the common man.
There are two ways to take over a society, by force or by economic subterfuge. Subterfuge however requires distraction, confusion, and instability as cover.
Transforming a natural patriarchy into an artificial matriarchy weakens and destabilizes any cultural, making it easy prey for takeover. No men, no force of arms, no real resistance.
Ego1ace 6 months ago 5
Not only can the common man no longer be a man in a relatonship, pieces are falling into place where he can no longer even be human, with human actions and reactions.
Ego1ace 6 months ago 16
@Ego1ace I agree. It's bad and getting worse.
manwomanmyth 6 months ago 12
@manwomanmyth I am leaving this country. Not going to have a relationship with a woman here"
brownie1982ad 1 week ago
>Refusing to talk to her
>Repeteadly interrogating her
What the fuck do I do!
>Watching her at home or work
But if I never look at her, that would be ignoring her. I don't want to go to jail, I think I'll be better alone for the rest of my life.
bbbbbb222222 6 months ago 5
@bbbbbb222222
That or marry a woman that isn't a "feminist."
Having said that she could turn into one later and destroy you. You want to risk it?
ropowerman 6 months ago
@ropowerman To be honest I wish I was gay bro. But not the butterfly kind of gay surrounded by female friends, no. Like myself but with another normal dude that'd be my gay boyfriend.
bbbbbb222222 6 months ago
I appreciate a lot of your content, but those 'creative' domestic violence definitions are from a defunct website and nearly ten years old. The current definitions of violence on the major governmental and women's charity websites are far more sensible and acknowledge violence as a potentially bi-directional.
This felt like a straw man.
HorridFroth 6 months ago
@HorridFroth For a "straw man" argument, how is it that one of those "creative" definitions from a "defunct" website "nearly 10 years old" are now passing into law as I write this?
Do you think that the individuals and agencies behind such drivel simply packed up and disappeared after the project was over?
What you are trying to play down is the obvious extent to which those definitions from the recent past inform public policy today. Hence my whole series on DV.
This felt like a troll comment.
manwomanmyth 6 months ago 4
It's a shame you interpreted it that way. As I said, I like a lot of your content.
Which of those definitions is passing into law?
My use of quotes on the word creative was a means of paraphrasing 'overblown feminist wacko nonsense', not a way of being confrontational. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Your use of quotes on my (accurate) terms 'defunct' and 'nearly ten years old' WAS confrontational.
I'm sure we're on the same side, but maybe not communicating effectively.
HorridFroth 6 months ago
Reflecting, I take it that the recent judgement which extends the definition of abuse to verbal abuse is the one you're referring to? If one can read past the Mail's trivialisation of the content of the ruling, then it all seems perfectly fair to me. Additionally, that factsheet from 2002 is, I think, intended to portray a spectrum of behaviours that could constitute abuse. Individually, they can be seen as petty and facile, but as part of a wider gestalt of behaviour, they can be abusive...
HorridFroth 6 months ago
@HorridFroth In one comment, you say "overblown feminist wacko nonsense". In another you say you understand the intention behind such nonsense. You clearly don't and we are clearly not on the same side as regards Feminism or indeed, sanity.
manwomanmyth 6 months ago 2
Another great video. Just shows how far we have fallen. You want to know why the world is in decline? Because the world doesn't want strong men. These women who have gotten into power want to emasculate and vilify men so they become weak and submissive. And frankly, the women just don't have the ability to make up for the lack of these strong male influences in the world today. According to the world at large, if you are a strong, independent male, you are evil and must be "reeducated".
compmanio36 7 months ago 5
wait. whats the REAL statistic? like the physical violence statistic?
awesome9001 7 months ago
@awesome9001 From the British crime survey 1999 (confirmed in 2000) "4.2% of women and 4.2% of men said they had been physically assaulted by a current or former partner in the last year".
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
@manwomanmyth wow, thats alot lower than the statistic that the feminists gave us, but that wasn't the real statistic. thanks though.
awesome9001 7 months ago
Just saying, That list is far too long for it's own good and there are a LOT of whiney, pathetic, pedantic, overly dramatising women out there.
Jacobsenacc 7 months ago
Judging by things on that list, anyone who's NOT a domestic abuser is a spineless piece of shit.
SpelKille 7 months ago 5
you men might as well just leave women alone all together...trusts me i'm gay...its better without the women when it comes to relationships.
iiablaze 7 months ago 3
If shouting at your spouse is domestic violence, then shouting at your kids is child abuse. The government is seriously disfunctional and I'm starting to think the anarchists may be onto something.
davegate2000 7 months ago 4
The info in this video is old. The latest "Statistic" I've seen quoted by Feminists (no source given of course) is that 1 in 3 women are sexually abused by the time they're 18. Such a high number couldn't be committed by a few perpetrators, so the implication is clear. All men are either abusers or indifferent to abuse of women. (Obviously women aren't considered abusers.) Soon it will be 1 in 2 then 100%. Feminists will find a way to expand upon the definition of abuse to include all women.
Quintapus 7 months ago
@Quintapus I give it 2 more years before a government agency declares that, as you say, ALL women suffer DV at the hands of their male partners.
Remember Dworkin and the idea that ALL heterosexual intercourse is (essentially) rape? Soon ALL heterosexual relationships will be classed as abusive. I wonder, how clear does it need to be to see that government and Feminism are becoming identical?
manwomanmyth 7 months ago 4
Am I the only one that noticed that that long list is a more accurate psychological profile of the evil schemes that women do against men in almost all relationships? Saying hurtful things, taking his money, screaming at him, preventing him from sleeping, enforcing a routine, insulting him, threatens to report him to the authorities? This kind of shit is the sort of evil manipulative conniving shit that women always do against men! Feminism is officially Organized Sexism on par with Neo-Nazism.
xm377Moyocoyatzin 7 months ago 14
@xm377Moyocoyatzin Completely agree. ALL forms of DV, even those committed by women, counts as male DV. Go figure.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
I saw "restricting her movements" on the list of "domestic violence"; but consider a crawling or toddling baby, who is by nature quite the explorer, would it not be an inexcusable irresponsibility to allow the child unrestricted movement?
Consider also streets, bodies of water, construction zones, animal-yards. Simply put not restricting the movement of a small child is inviting injury or death.
OneWingedShark 7 months ago
The size of that list is enormous, I dont think you could be in a relationship without doing somthing on the list. Kinda sad, makes somthing that should be taken seriously into a joke. I guess we all know that the real reason the list is so big is to make the umbrella encompassing "domestic violence" as big as possible to sustain the bogus statistics which of course means prolonged and even expanded funding. What a cycle...
cmiller8492 7 months ago 2
@cmiller8492 Exactly. Everyone is guilty and everyone is a criminal. It's just down to the state to decide when to target you for it. All men are in a perpetual state of being guilty of crimes against women, and the axe over our heads just follows us around until some woman or some agency decides to bring it down.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
I think it is important to widen the definition of domestic abuse deemed criminal, as is happening, in order to protect men from those acts. Why would MRAs object to more protection from abusive females? MRAs should be focusing their attentions on getting prosecutions of women for domestic abuse through the courts, so the media can have a debate about the way women treat men - and the henpecking or worst forms of psychological abuse which are no longer acceptable. Time to get ahead of the game.
tom181071 7 months ago
@tom181071 Great in principle, but as I've covered in the DV films, for a multitude of reasons, these "protections" are not available to men and to the extent to which they are, men will not apply them. It is not in men's nature, in general, to make use of such provisions. Further the legal system is not inclined to support men in any area of DV.
The question is, is engaging with this stacked-game, this legal framework which is bad for everyone but especially bad for men, the way forward?
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
@manwomanmyth The multitude of reasons these protections are not currently being taken up by men, need to be challenged. If 'men's nature' is part of the lag - then this should be criticized, along with criticizing any structural obstacles, and female/feminist/antifeminist refusals too.
Women use 4 times more hostile sexist speech than men. It is abuse. It does have negative consequences. Misandry is in all our natures, but we learn not to use it by being policed, culturally and legally.
tom181071 7 months ago 2
@tom181071 I agree in part. But if this challenge means accepting that shouting is DV, we'll be capitulating to the idea that ALL relationships are abusive.
Sometimes it's best to refuse to accept the playing field defined by those whose only interest is SELF-interest. Why should we all become grist for their mill and give more work to lawyers, social workers and divorce courts over behaviours that are normal?
I think that jumping in to this mess (and thereby validating it) is the wrong move.
manwomanmyth 6 months ago
Speaking maliciously, should be deemed criminal. Professional, stubborn, victim-feminist rhetoric, which deliberately refuses to reflect facts, in effect disparaging men - flak - should be considered crime against humanity. Fascist dictatorships start at home, where 90% of men are subservient - a lot taking abuse with orders. The home, is where human's right to dignity must be protected. MRAs need to catalogue relational misandry to test in court. A few test cases deter a million acts of abuse.
tom181071 6 months ago
@tom181071 I'm in two minds about this. I agree about "flak" and also agree that women do not face sanction for their verbal abuse (nor, generally, for their physical abuse).
However, court cases just feed the system. They won't fix relationships, they'll destroy them.
Maybe relations between men and women do need some kind of root-and-branch fix, but the law has no interest in this entire area besides criminalising men. As Erin Pizzey has said, we need to get the law OUT of domestic violence.
manwomanmyth 6 months ago
@manwomanmyth Get the law out, by identifying abusive relationships in a compulsory yearly, two minute phone interview with each partner, and each child, with a lie detector - to identify abuses, and verify them, to reduce them - so if divorce is later filed for, and it can be shown the woman uses psychological abuse, or parental alienation etc, it can be argued she is therefore less fit to parent, and will receive less custody - a strong deterrent for abusive henpeckers to evolve their ways.
tom181071 6 months ago
... You know, I seriously do wonder if it's going to come down to a civil war or something between men and women. I mean, you can't talk to them, you can't put them in their place on an intellectual level because anything you say is outright evil and hateful.. So what would they do when the men, mindless physical creatures as they've classed us all it seems, revolt and start a real physical confrontation over the matter? Not saying it should happen, just that it seems we're going that way now.
digiviceboy 7 months ago 4
@digiviceboy If there is ever a war, it won't (and it shouldn't) be between men and women.
As I covered somewhere else, in the battle of the sexes there was never meant to be a winner, only two losers.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
@manwomanmyth Mmm. I never said there would be a winner. I just said that eventually buttons are going to end up being pushed and someone's going to blow their stack at some point in time. While THAT is real violence, and deserves to be pointed out as such with shame towards the one(s) that do commit it, could you blame them? I hope it never has to happen and both feminists and MRA supporters can sit down and evenly talk.. but then, I also have hopes for hearing a weather report of Hell frozen.
digiviceboy 7 months ago
@digiviceboy Hm. Do you really think that this is about Feminists and MRA's sitting down and talking? I am not attacking you here, just pointing out that "MRA" and "Feminist" are not equal and opposite as you seem to suggest here. However, a lot of people think this and I intend to do a film bout this misunderstanding as it is very damaging to our aspirations for human rights when we believe that Feminism is simply a valid viewpoint or arguing position rather than the toxic ideology it is.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
@manwomanmyth No, not equal, but the /people in the movements and followings/ are equal, which is where I'm expecting a sit down and chat. It's quite obvious women have equal rights in Western society; Damn near even more rights, superfluously. That's not right, nor fair, but of course, Feminists would like it all their way. Greedy is as greedy does. I'm not thinking of Feminist or MRA as equal nor above each other, but everybody needs to get their facts straight and understand what real
digiviceboy 7 months ago
@digiviceboy equallity actually is.
digiviceboy 7 months ago
MRA 4 LIIIIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OutSpokenGamer 7 months ago 2
"Acting in an unpredictable manner"???
ytmachx 7 months ago 3
@ytmachx -- I guess that throws surprises right out the window.
OneWingedShark 7 months ago
@OneWingedShark Yeah! and women are supposed to like surprises. Well, no more flowers for no good reason.
ytmachx 7 months ago
On the suicide issue: If its used to guilt-trip your spouse, or bait for sympathy, it makes sense. So, I don't really think "attempting" suicide should be domestic abuse, so much as "threatening" suicide.
WatcherAzrael 7 months ago
this society is evil and sick and by watching this video does prove that it realy hates men. we are in deep shit!!!! time to stand up for yourselves!!!!
TheKareem1979 7 months ago
men are retarded for getting into relationships with women .. just fuck them and move on. give them nothing, never let them move in. never get married ........... most men are such losers ...
mikesomething 7 months ago
@mikesomething No, your attitude here could be seen as equally "retarded". Having sex and moving on has it's own severe risks. The problem here is not "men" (nor in the final analysis) is it "women". The real problem is those who are using women against men.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
@manwomanmyth severe risks ? like what ?
mikesomething 7 months ago
is this a repost? the end sounds familiar
ztakn 7 months ago
@ztakn Re-worked footage mostly. Aiming for short clips hitting single topics.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
Isn't it strange that both taking her money and making her ask for yours is considered violence?
TheLaughingOut 7 months ago 5
Domestic Violence is anything what a woman deems it to be.
MaxxTheMerciless 7 months ago 2
i hate feminism
mulonzee877 7 months ago 4
"Getting information from her children" Does that mean that if I ask my kid how school was that it should be counted the same as beating him?
TheLordmep 7 months ago 5
In other words, when a woman is unhappy it's domestic violence.
fistoffries 7 months ago 48
@fistoffries Bingo!
MrBillTroop73 7 months ago
@fistoffries unhappiness not required, also applies when;
she feels bored,
she has a friend who is unhappy (especially when a man is involved),
she feels she wants more emotional response from you,
she has seen upset women on TV, or, seen something to upset women on TV,
she remembers the golden rule, 'Half!' (as Eddy Murphy says),
she feels you have done something (now, months, or years ago) to assert your equality,
she sees a smile on your face,
etc., etc., etc.
tlrlml 7 months ago 2
@fistoffries
Yep. If I don't give my misus money to buy a new LV bag everyday... I am a criminal.
ropowerman 6 months ago
@fistoffries Women are Abominations. They cause misery and pain, they do not serve a purpose. They abuse us, make more money and keep us down while they complain about us! We should create artificial wombs and be done with them!
Kill your mothers, sister, daughters, all females in your family. We will keep some, they will be sterilized and used as domestic servants and fuck slaves. The oppression of men must end!
WhiteRose057 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WhiteRose057 We need to figure out a way to make men asexual.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
Wait, so we are not allowed to (within reason) exhibit normal human behavior?
I don't condone abuse or physical and emotional harm, but this basically tells men that they are not allowed to be a human being. The "Bringing her unwanted gifts" one was by far the most ridiculous.
ActionReplayPerson 7 months ago 7
I am a violent man, and I am angry at my girlfriend, the angriest I've ever been, so when she gets home, boy, am I going to criticise her appearance, laugh at her, and not give her any money, grrrrrrr :)
6oodfella 7 months ago 38
@6oodfella Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahhahaha
commonsen5e 7 months ago
@6oodfella Sometimes I get so angry, I look at my girlfriend.
Galacticavatar 7 months ago 4
Is it considered sexist if I Thumbs Up a video by MWM before I even watch it?
ColonelCosmic 7 months ago 5
@ColonelCosmic Nope!
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
As I said in my video about this subject, it'll soon be DV if a man hogs the remote, scratches his balls, or is not psychic :)
Glad you covered this.
6oodfella 7 months ago 4
@6oodfella I'm sure those heinous male crimes are on the list somewhere.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
Wow. The British government, and subsequently the British legal system actually think that these are legitimate forms of domestic violence? I feel sorry for English men.
obglobgablob 7 months ago 3
@obglobgablob Don't feel sorry for us. If they're not in use already, these definitions will be coming to a legislature near you, real soon.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
@manwomanmyth
And that is what troubles me the most about it.
obglobgablob 7 months ago
Wunderbar!
krishollow 7 months ago
anytime you want to link to any of my videos please do my friend
pinegrove33 7 months ago 5
@pinegrove33 Will do. Same for you, of course. Haven't done much linking before but it's a good idea.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago 6
STILL LOVING THESE!
pinegrove33 7 months ago
@MrCombatveteran what'll bring her to reality even quicker is if the cops in her district dont do jack-squat to enforce the law she is trying to activate. if she is professionally ignored, not taken seriously, shunned, and eventually disbarred, that'll wake her and everybody else up. public humiliation and professional embasrrassment is a good route to go. from the sounds of it, she's got the same root feature all such feminists have ... a massive ego; which will crush her when it is broken.
paragshah2112 7 months ago
@paragshah2112 If only. The fact is, the police WILL enforce this because, perversely , it's "good" for them too. Dear Brenda is no fool, she knows that she is scratching many backs with such vile judgments. It's only the people who lose.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
@m i was thinking about this vid for some time yesterday. i realized something else about the intent behind allowing this kind of sillyness to pass as 'violence'. what it allows women to do now, is "defend" themselves against it with impunity. if a man calls her a bitch, and she reacts physically violent, she can then say she was defending herself against violence. if a man did such a thing, he'd burn at the stake. what this law is meant to do, is institute a modern day caste system. nefarious.
paragshah2112 7 months ago
@paragshah2112 Very, very good point. I didn't think about that in this way. Shouting and hitting have legally gained equivalence, but only in favour of women, of course.
If a man shouts at a woman and she hits him, he's an abuser.
If a woman shouts at a man and he hits her, he's an abuser.
Caste system indeed.
manwomanmyth 7 months ago
Balance the definition of domestic violence with an increasing demand from women for "dominant" men - a term they use borrowed from alternative culture.
drewmaughan 7 months ago
Typical. Notice the pronouns? HER. So when SHE does it to HIM, it isnt.
TMOTS
themanonthestreet 7 months ago 3
@themanonthestreet double standards are great, right?
spoogeling 7 months ago
Heil Brenda.
AVMamfortas 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
suchafool990 7 months ago
It's nice to see more videos from you.
Jogeta5 7 months ago 2