He took the typical route of misapplying Matthew 25 to those that are bad off or in need. This passage has nothing to do with a social gospel as so many claim it does. Read the passage in context-the judgement has already taken place in this text. The "brothers" are believers, not people who need help with being fed, given water, etc. How unsurprising.
@rorshakks What so ever you do for the least of my brothers, you do for me. Which means bad or good, he was using it out of context perhaps but he proved his point, so who cares?
if jesus crossed the rio grande, or overstayed his visa, or run away from a cruise ship . . . and worked as a carpenter. i will look up matthew 25 , for guidance.
@kukz65 No instead He lived His entire life knowing He would die for everybody bearing the sins of the world on His body. He suffered shock, beatings, brutality, suffocation, dehydration, crucifixion, flogging, mockery, He had everything but gave it up for the people of the world to be with them. He should have been welcomed but His own people rejected Him. Watch what you say about the Bible. It has more guidance than you know for anything.
The only reason we dignify your utter silliness is for the entertainment value. You're potentially a classic example of an idiot-savant, in that you put together impressive sentences but you're unable to put together sophisticated thoughts. On the other hand, I haven't ruled out the possibility that in your lonely old life you endlessly sit at your PC getting drunker & drunker & drunker. This reality might better explain your perpetual ignorance and bigoted demeanor.
@FynalAuthority What you fail to understand is that those Klansmen with whom you share ideas do not count as discerning minds. Most of their minds have been damaged, as has yours, through generations of inbreeding. The same observation is in order concerning the Nazis with whom you did time. And each time you dodge any real dialog with this Brown Shirts tactic of displacing your racism upon the victims of that bigotry, you reveal yourself for what you are: A racist simpleton without humanity.
Yep, you're right, I made a gratuitous typo and you have the prerogative to rub it in. I failed to edit myself and didn't proof read my spell corrector. Nonetheless, your replies remain steadfastly consistent with a lack intellectualism and an abundance of superficial criticism. The fact remains that you desperately lack workable substance and your only recourse is to ridicule grammar and/or make incredulous statements against the majority of White America.
@FynalAuthority I thought that was you. Cowering behind yet another screen name, I see. It was to be expected. And you have found a new playmate, congratulations. You two should get along well. Think of the great times yáll will have at the KKK cookouts. His posting style is not so churrigueresque as is yours but, he is a big fan of the Mac-across-the-net tactic, your favorite and his. As for the rest of your post, well, just more Mac-across-the-net. To be expected.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte I have read from many fools on YouTube before, but never have I met someone as persistently foolish as you. You are cognitively flat and intellectually inept with your only armament of calling people bigots and klansman. Most children can argue with more meaningful substance than you can. I don't know who you are but I am grateful you're not my neighbor because your stupidity and anti-social ways would significantly lower the property value of the neighborhood.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte Could it be entirely true that you are capable of nothing more than slandering White America with your irresponsible name-calling, as well as imagining you know people you've never met? Could it be that you're not only woefully dumb, but that you're also legitimately deranged? I'm sincerely starting to feel sympathy for you and your congenital condition(s).
Matthew 25 is a brilliant piece of moral, and I say that as an atheist. Too often atheists, when attacking religion, forget that sometimes religion gets it right.
Matthew 25 is one of those cases. Those who help the needy, the poor, the sick, are truly "gods people,"
Wow...such a good point. If only more of the so called Christians in Congress would truly think of "the least" of this country a little more often. 10 points Mr. Colbert
Here in Australia it's illegal to work as a tourist and it's illegal to "hire" someone without tax, super etc... but (aparently, I'm not an expert just what I heard) it's not illegal to "trade" board and food etc for work. That is, a tourist can come here and pick fruit for a week then for two weeks worth of food and accomodation. (For instance).
This is why the Repugs are so angry about his appearance. They all go on about what great Christians they are, but they're full of shit. So, when someone comes along who actually follows the teachings of Christ, it pisses them off.
Oh, and for the sake of bipartisanship: Steny Hoyer can go fuck himself.
Colbert is not a very religious man, he plays the role as a all-american god-fearing patriot. This line fits with that greatly. He is basically using the bible against those who oppose the migrant workers the most. The religious southerns.
@jimius No, he actually is very religious. He comes from a family of devout Catholics and, outside of his character, has expressed that his family are all practicing and church-going.
To those who think the immigration process is "easy" and that undocumented workers do not pay taxes, I can tell you that this is most definitely NOT the case. Legal immigration is nearly impossible under our current system, especially for those from south of the border. And they DO pay taxes. Many pay into our system and will never see a single dime back. They also pay sales taxes, just like everyone else. As @MarkRosengarten said, most migrant workers are little more than under-the-table slaves
@bill4588 You apparently have never been through the immigration process. It's not "easily" done for any immigrant, Latino or otherwise, but I can tell you that Latino immigrants do have a harder time with the process than, say, Canadian immigrants. Also, the number of undocumented immigrants who have been filing for federal income tax has been rising. Undocumented immigrants want citizenship; they've built ties to their communities and built families here.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
most illegals dont really want citizenship...they want to come here, make a lot of TAX FREE money and then go back home. any illegal who wants to be a citizen can easily do so, the legal way.
Even if I sometimes disagree with him politically, I want to thank Mr. Colbert for standing up for these people and mentioning the Gospel in front of Congress. God knows they need more of that.
@jhamm999 as if the exploiters just can't help themselves, they have to exploit. As if we can let them all in here legally if they so choose, as if they aren't wanted here for their cheap labor, which is a result of them being here illegally.
@stargleamer no,they are here illegally because they choose to not obey our laws. millions before them have come here legally and have become good citizens.
I hate people like you. you dont realize its pretty damn near impossible to come here legally. it takes so fucking long. If they waited they would starve to death. And what laws do they break? which laws do they no obey?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@cuishi14 then why have millions of others done it einstein? they break the law by crossing the border illegally. they are called illegal immigrants for a reason.
@jhamm999 I'm sure that any reasonable person would rather that everything were done in such a way that all reasonable legalities were satisfied but, when those legal channels become so exigent that educated people with resources have trouble complying, while the uneducated without resources find it almost impossible, it is time for a nation of immigrants to show some understanding. Also, the employers who need these workers have an equally difficult time complying with immigration laws.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte i'm all for streamlining the process so people who want to come here can do so easier. what i'm against is letting them come here illegally,which would be unfair to the millions who obeyed our laws. we need to close the border,then we can set up a smart guest worker program. but most of all helping our neighbors to the south to control the drug cartels,get rid of corruption in their govt,so the law abiding citizens would not feel the need to come here in the first place.
@jhamm999 I would hate to be your neighbor. Fairplay is not what these reactionary laws and campagns are about. There is little or no compitition between the labor markets into which those who attempt to immigrate through legal means try to enter and those into which the undocumented move. "Illegal" is a code word for "spic" or "beaner" or whatever slur you like. It is once again the powerful abusing the powerless. The hate comes first, then it is sold as "fairplay" or "rule of law." WABOS!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte i was wondering when the race baiting would start. just because you obviously don't respect the law doesn't mean everyone else has to.
@jhamm999 And, what is it that makes that obvious? On the other hand, your so called "race baiting" has a great deal of ammunition to use. A movement which does not wish to wish to be seen as racist does not have a hate group write its laws; it does not get neo-Nazis to put on its rallies; it does not ask racists to sponsor the bills written by that hate group; it does not lie to its public; et cetera. No, I think that the the movement was custom made for racists. Is that your interest in it?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte yes the idiocy of your argument saying if you want the border to be sealed is code word for spic,or beaner. that is intellectually bankrupt as well. if you don't like the laws change them. what movement are you talking about? lulac,la raza,those racist groups? i say put the military on the border to back up the fence when we build it. if you want to see a hypocrite nation check out mexico's immigration policy.
@jhamm999 I never said that the a concern for the border was code for “spic” and “beaner,” et cetera. I said that the use of the term “illegal” has become tantamount to those racist slurs. Your prevarication shows a perceived impotence with your own argument. La Raza did not write SB 1070, FAIR did. Once again, your evasions have proven to be a spent force.
What about Mexico's policy? Is it so good that we should adopt it? Is it so bad that we should should be worse, out of vindictiveness? ...?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte the use of the word illegal as in illegal immigrant is used to describe a person who came here illegally,or once was here legally and overstayed their visa and have not left the country. it doesn't matter if they are from mexico or canada. illegal is illegal. as far as s.b. 1070,have you read the bill? it actually is less stringent than the federal law .
@jhamm999 I am perfectly aware of the word’s denotation and I am also aware of the legal connections behind which the border bigots wish to hide. (BTW, you used a plural possessive with a singular antecedent.) Still, the connotation, which you have tried to obscure, remains exactly as I described it earlier. That was an unsuccessful dodge, I’m afraid.
Yes, I have read SB 1070 many times but, even if I hadn’t read it, it was still written by FAIR.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte 'the border bigots'. and you still claim that you said people who want to secure the borders are not bigots? please. o.k. so you are for open borders. change the law. you,like many libs totally make slurs,call people racists taht disagree with you because you can't argue the facts. s.b. 1071 states that a police officer cannot check on the status unless they are in the ordinary call of duty. someone gets stopped,asked for i.d. and present a az. d.l. everything is fine.
@jhamm999 I have no trouble arguing the facts. Bring them on. That would represent a welcome change, if you can stay on topic. I am getting tired of your perpetually dodging and changing the line of discussion.
@jhamm999 What's the matter, no guts? Yes, bigots are usually cowards too, so I guess it was not unexpected that you should turn out to be both. But, since you wish to provide no facts, even though it was you who brought up the challenge, I am more than happy to begin.
Fact 1: The USA is a nation of immigrants.
Fact 2: The US and Mexico are neighbors.
Fact 3: The border between the US and Mexico is not a natural border nor a human border but rather a political border.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte no the gutless ones are people like you,who deny the basic fact that coutries have a right to their own soveriegnity. there is nothing in your facts that are earthshaking,so tell me something i don't know. a FACT for you. we get to decide our immigration laws,no one else. and unless you come into this country through legal channels you are here illegally. and the continued intellectually bankrupt race baiting pablum you spill out will not change those FACTS. understand that?
@jhamm999 You will have to produce evidence of my having denied any such thing. In the event that you should fail to produce such a denial, I will conclude that this is just one more attempt to obfuscate and evade so greater scrutiny will not expose flaws in positions that you have adopted.
Fact 4: Illegal immigration has a long history in the US.
Fact 5: Illegal immigrants who write laws that legalize their own status are also compromised by that status.
@jhamm999 Fact 13: The Statue of Liberty was unveiled in 1886. Fact 14: Ellis Island opened in 1892. Fact 15: One million immigrants passed through Ellis Island in 1907. Fact 16: Elis island is closed in 1954.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte the examples you gave was when we basically had no immigration laws. we were still an infant nation. and to compare the chinese exclusion act to s.b.1070. tells me you are not familiar with s.b. 1070 at all.
@jhamm999 Fact 17: 1881-1920: Third large wave of immigration saw about 23.5 million, mainly southern and eastern european, immigrants arrive. Fact 18: Congress requires immigrants to pass literacy tests in 1917. Fact 19: In a bigoted act of Congress, immigrant numbers were limited by nationality.
Bigotry and immigration policy seem to love each other's company. Does that explain your interest?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte like i said each country sets it's own policy. todays laws do not discriminate. if you are here illegally it doesn't matter what country you are from. your history recall is nice,but it doesn't pertain to the situation today. we also had blacks on plantations once but not today. so if you wouldn't mind try to to come into this century?
@jhamm999 You are such a hypocrite; you ask for facts from others but provide only surmise and wild conjecture. Ethics is so alien to you! (BTW: You used “like” as a conjunction.)
Fact 20: Operation Wetback was a bigoted 1954 operation by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to remove about one million Mexican, Mexican American, and others deemed not white enough, from the southwestern United States. (Another precursor to SB 1070.)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte we were discussing s.b. 1070 and then you go on this tangebt about historical legislation,to prove what point? you cannot defeat the logic of immigration laws so you name call and obfuscate yourself. i think the term i'm looking for is projection. wake me when you get into the 21st century. zzzzzzzzz.
@jhamm999 Still nothing to contribute, I see. Just more Mac-across-the-net tactics, and to think, you asked for facts, now you want to start with logic? Any time.
Fact 21: SB 1070 was written by the hate group FAIR.
Fact 22: SB 1070 was sponsored by an Arizona congressman with ties to racist organizations, Russell Pearce.
Fact 23: The same racist players involved in SB 1070, were also involved with ending ethnic studies in Arizona and in the firing of Arizona teachers with accents.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte fair is a hate group for wanting to enforce the law? is that your point,mr ad hominem? laughable. last time i checked fair was not in the congress so cannot write legislation. and before i forget the thing you said that set it off was people who were illegally should not be writing immigration laws,or words to that effect. for your info our founders that came here there were no immigration laws. now there are. that is why i found your posts amusing.
@jhamm999 Do not ask me why FAIR chose to organize around bigotry and xenophobia. Their interest in the law, on the other hand, has to do with making laws conform to their bigotries and xenophobia.
You should go back to the illiterate Klansman who home-schooled you and ask for another lesson in civics. Anybody can write a bill. It is then congress which processes that bill toward becoming a law. The rest of your post is unintelligible. Please restate. Quote my posts if you must.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte public school trained so tyhat answers your first slanderous attack. and you are the one who needs a remedial course in civics as well as the constitution. 1st amendment gives citizens the right to redress the govt. for threir grievances. so while fair and other people who want to be good americans and enforce the laws ,it is up to the congress to act,or not to act upon them. don't blame me because you open borders crowd didn't get your way and is now having a conniption fit.
@jhamm999 This is entirely too one sided. You ask for facts, but provide none (you are behind 23-0). Then you ask for logic while showing yourself incapable the most elementary levels of reading comprehension... Must I do all the heavy lifting here? No need to answer that; facts and logic are obviously too exigent for your bigot's brain to comprehend.
Fact 24: In order that a Bill (written by anybody) should become Law, it must be presented to Congress.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte how can i have a intelligent debate with someone that actually thinks a group of unelected citizens come into a legislature and writes a law? go back to civics 101 and talk to me then.
@jhamm999 You cannot have an “intelligent debate” with anybody because you are a slow-witted cretin! To my knowledge, nobody here has maintained that any “group of unelected citizens [has] come into a legislature and writ[ten] a[ny] law.” That is your own fabrication. I certainly never said that SL 1070 was written by FAIR; I said that SB 1070 was written by FAIR, as it was. Your difficulty with cognitive skills may stem from the inbreeding having produced a bantam brain. Cubic capacity...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte point taken now how can they write the legislative language for the bill which eventually became law. your gross and wrong headed assumptions are mind boggling. also what do you think of the 1940 law signed by fdr which it's enforcement mechanism is far tougher than s.b.1070?
@jhamm999 I have few problems with strict regulation, per se. I bewail and deplore the engrossment of xenophobic odium in the law making process, and condemn it equally under FDR or Eisenhower or Reagan or Obama, ... Yet, this climate of bigotry is assiduously afoot each time Congress addresses our immigration policy. What is worse, once again, racism constitutes the chief motivating factor for drawing attention to the issue. Bigotry before justice, well-being or fair-play. WABOS!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte what does wabos mean? second why do you automatically assign insidious motives to people who simply want to control the border which is every countries right? if the law is enforced equally,meaning if an illegal is from mexico,sweden,japan,regardless why do you object? i'll ask you,what would you do if you had the power to write our immigration laws?
Your second question is premature. To my knowledge, you have not yet established that I do anything "automatically," let alone "assign insidious motives to people who simply want to control the border." To what people do you refer?
If I had the power to write our immigration laws, I would first hold a series of public discussions to determine foundation. A nation of immigrants, the US, has a unique relationship with the dynamic that other nations do not.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte With all do respect, the other guy out debated you in principle and logic. In case you're not aware, the terms racist and bigot have lost their intrinsic value as a result of superficial usage by persons like you. The only thing of substantive value you have proven is that there is a new and growing cult of hateful Hispanics just like you.
@FynalAuthority "With all do respect..."? Maybe you mean "... all dew respect..."? Well, whatever you mean, with all due respect, your Mac-across-the-net attempt was all too (not "to" or "two" or even "tú") transparent and came way (or is it "weigh"?) too late in the match for it to serve your purpose. Maybe next time (not "thyme").
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jhamm999 Yep, that's right. This guy is intellectually useless because he is not capable of separating his own unadulterated bigotry from an otherwise good faith and objective discussion. Once a person gets past the frustration level they'll often find these types of YouTube Bozos to be highly laughable.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@FynalAuthority he has a set of values that he wishes not to expose for some reason. i think it is because he is a open border guy at heart. he doesn't understand we are not the same country that we were over 100 years ago.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jhamm999 Too many people try to blackmail and coerce America with the ineffective argument that because America was once necessitated by immigrants that it must therefore forever maintain endless open borders for any and all people to come and go as they please. What's so inept about these ill-informed proponents is their juvenile ignorance in not knowing that every civilization in every corner of the world has a beginninig history of people having relocated themselves at one time or another.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jhamm 999 Assuming this maniac is a guy, he's not only an open-borders monger but he's also a non-sequitur fool. Now he's saying you and I are KKK playmates. It is sure obvious how he substitutes foolishness for substantiveness when defeated in principle. I don't know whether to play with this moron for a while or just leave him alone in his minuscule world of hate and ignorance.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@FynalAuthority fools resort to name calling when they run out of intellectual ammo. i think we should follow my late mom's advice when she said never get into a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jhamm999 Your Mother (God Rest Her Soul) was a smart woman. My Dad (God Rest His Soul) told me something very similar. He said - "Learn to smile upon fools rather than frown upon their shortcomings."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte well lets see,you call them xenophobes,bigots i,e, s.b.1070 supporters. and you wonder why i said what i said? what foundation do you wish to determine? lets start with the premise that any country has the right to make their own immigration laws. what is wrong with my notion that we seal off the borders using the military if necessary build the wall. then try to get as many illegals in the country out now,streamline the laws,work out a solid guest worker program.
@jhamm999 I call xenophobes and bigots xenophobes and bigots, so what? And I still “wonder [...] why [you] said what [you] said.” As I recall, you asked that we deal in facts but then provided none. Then, you asked for logic but offered only surmise, convulsive conjecture, obfuscation, and character assassination. You conclude without the benefit of evidence and change directions before any depth can be attained.
BTW: You used a plural possessive with a singular antecedent, again.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte but you call people those names for the reason they support laws like s.b. 1070. now you are simply lying to not only me but yourself. then you have the nerve to say i engage in character assassination when you tell me i'm a klansman? tell me is your i.q. above room temperature? never mind i won this argument a long time ago when you started using invectives. you sir are a poppinjay.
@jhamm999 You should learn to read. It should be easy with all the posts in front of you. Your bigotry and your bantam brain seems to have trouble following a linear discussion. I thought that you did it deliberately before, in order prevent in depth treatment of a topic, so that you might follow up by calling my treatment of that topic superficial. However, now I believe that you are simply not smart enough to carry on a simple conversation or read and understand a simple post. Go join FAIR.
@jhamm999 I almost missed this. Somebody flagged it as spam. I hope it was an accident. Your posts are filled with betise, but they are certainly not spam.
As fo my denials, all you have to do is produce evidence of your accusations. My posts are right in front of you. Until that time, keep ducking and dodging.
Fact 25: FAIR founder, John Tanton, is a nativist whose bigotries are reserved primarily, though not exclusively, for Catholics, and Latinos, in general, and Hispanics, in particular.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte fact-70% of arizonans support s.b. 1070. including a sizable portion of the hispanic community.
fact-60% of americans support s.b. 1070. but i guess to you they are all abunch of xenophobes,racists,bigots. man up and say your sorry for calling us names that we do not deserve and maybe you will earn a measure of respect.
@jhamm999 You forgot to mention which poll you are quoting. For all I know, you may be quoting your KKK poll. According to the poll conducted by the Behavior Research Center (BRC) in Phoenix, support for 1070 stands at 52 percent in favor to 39 percent opposed and 9 percent unsure. Among registered voters, 56 percent favor while 34 percent oppose the immigration law. Wow! You can't even do facts.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte gallup poll. and you sure do ad hominems good still. but i'm sure you will deny that you ever said it. are you related to bill clinton in that respect? you are out of ammo douchebag so give it up. even in your poll you lose. so keep om telling me how your not spewing racial invectives and trying to stay on the high ground. someday even you might bekieve it.
@jhamm999 Want me to say I’m sorry? Very well: I'm sorry that you're a xenophobe and a bigot. I’m sorry the mere mention of racial inequities sends your Anglo-centric persecution complex into a frenzy and, before looking into verity, you immediately circle the wagons of the Caucasian caravan. I’m sorry you find detestation preferable to amicability, and whipping boys to consorts. I’m sorry you feel that racism in a mob trumps virtue in a crowd. I’m sorry, mostly, for your lack of humanity.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte and let me say i'm sorry. sorry for giving you the benefit of the doubt you were at least a smart liberal capable of carrying on a conversation without resorting to the default system of calling people racists because they disagree with you. i'm sorry that you cannot respect the rule of law. i'm sorry that have no reasoning skills. but i'm really sorry that you assume so much about me when you know nothing. that is truly a sign of a feeble mind.
@jhamm999 How can you say that I “assume so much about [you] when [I] know nothing”? I know a good deal. For example, I know that you claim the undocumented “are here illegally because they choose to not obey our laws” and that you provide no evidence for that claim other than that “millions of others done.” I know that Mac-across-the-net and head-in-the-sand are almost exclusively your tactics for dealing the race issues involved. I know your syntax stinks.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte i said they are illegally because they do not come here by following our laws as to how to get here legally. by walking across the border does not mean you are here legally,or are you really that dense?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte do you know anything at all about our laws? you see someone cross the border and not go through the legal channels that makes them illegal. but then again by your pretzel logic that is a racist term. how sad that you have no sense or command of the english language. btw what makes you assume i'm white? is it because you cannot imagine that a black or hispanic can ever have these views.?
@jhamm999 I know that you avoid upper case letters. I know your propensity for false syllogisms (e.g.: I actually said those who wrote and sponsored SB 1070 were bigots, so you claim that I called everybody who supports it a bigot). I know that you have a hard time distinguishing between a bill and a law. I know that you try to speak for me (e.g.: “... you are for open borders”). I know that your reading comprehension is dreadful. I know that your idea of history has an Anglo colonial prejudice.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte well if you think s.b. 1070 was a racist law then #1-prove it and#2 -it follows that the people who support such a racist law must be racist right? it's called putting 2+2 together. in fact you already have me pegged as a klansman. 'anglo colonial prtejudice'. such hateful bigoted speech for a liberal. tsk,tsk.
@jhamm999 Since you're anxious to make 1070 the topic, I’m happy to share my perspective. First, those involved with the bill forward —FAIR, Russell Pearce, J. T. Ready, et cetera— have deep racist roots. Second, 1070 did not go through alone but with a nimiety of other bills with divisive intentions, e.g.: the censorship of ethnic studies and the firing of teachers with accents, all sold after the murder of a rancher. Politicians incited a racist lynch mob, yet nobody knows who his killer is.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte that was our original starting point yes. you say they are racists because you saw them standing next to a person in a neo-nazi meeting. okay,i guess that means that obama hates america because he sat in rev. wright's church for 20 years. or because he knew bill ayers. see how guilt by association cuts both ways.
@jhamm999 What? "...because you saw them standing next ro a person in a neo-nazi meeting." I do not remember ever having said such a thing. I do not remember your ever even asking. Just the latest attempt to speak for me, pulled right out of the trailer court air. What a bloody coward you are. And don't think I didn't notice how far off topic this stupidity is taking us. You whine because we are not talking about 1070 but, when we do, you change the subject. Haven't gotten to the law itself yet.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte did you not send me a link that showed that? someone did. you want to talk about the law finally bozo? be glad to. show me where the racism is when it forbids racial profiling,states that the only way a officer can inquire about a persons status is in the normal duty the person does not present a valid i.d. what is bigoted about that?
People like the "g-monster" always resort to false charges of racism when they have been intellectually defeated in principle. This pathetic tactic is quickly becoming one of the oldest tricks in the books, and its buffoonery is not only frustrating those who are innocently accused but it's also angering serious minded individuals who have legitimate concerns but are finding their credibility compromised because of loose screws like the "g-monster."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@FynalAuthority he was intellectually bankrupt from the beginning. he has the hate whitey talking points down pat but when knowledgeable people like you and i confront him he folds like a bad poker hand.
I'm sure there's something good about the old man, but not when it comes to his being confused about SB1070. Profiling is what helps circumvent the crimes of terrorists, klansmen, panthers, illegal aliens, and a whole host of other criminals. If millions of Canadians were illegally crossing the borders and creating chaos & havoc in the northern states, I bet there would not be frivilous charges of racism, and I bet ginesdepasamonte would be the first one to defend the Northern law.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@FynalAuthority that is the problem with someone who deals in rhetoric and not facts or critical thinking. i bet he would be against keeping a closer eye on muslims at the airport check in.
@jhamm999 I never sent you any link; all my posts are right in front of you, illiterate moron. "Finally"? WABOS! All you had to do is ask, instead of claiming to have made it a topic without ever truly having done so.
The final form of 1070 is far less overtly racist than the first drafts submitted, nevertheless, much racism remains. Let's go to page 6 where the document says that race may not be the ONLY factor. That leaves only 1%; which could come from anything, 1%. Invitation to abuse!
@jhamm999 You really are pathetic! First you get caught in yet another lie, then you try to squirm out by accusing me of future lies. Mac-across-the-net seems more than a tactic to you, it’s an addiction. WABOS!
You need to lie more boldly. Take a tip from your fellow border bigots: lie proudly and publicly, and wait for their being inevitably exposed. In this way your constituents will know your meaning. The lie is part of the code. It says that the bigotry comes first, and justice be damned.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte you are either a congenital oliar or you suffer from short term memory loss. either way you are useless and don't belong in a rational debate. now i suppose you are saying it is bigotry to enforce the wabos.
@jhamm999 For somebody who was so anxious to talk about 1070, you certainly jumped off that ship in a hurry! And we hadn't even gotten to the part of the bill/law that compares the undocumented to a "rat infestation." What a bloody hypocrite you are!
@jhamm999 Why should that particular question interfere with our discussion of 1070? What have they to do with 1070? I understand those words perfectly. Wouldn't it be nice if 1070 used them. Instead, it says "The attorney general or county attorney shall not investigate complaints that are based solely on race, color or national origin" as I have already pointed out.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte s.b.1070 sec. 2b.-for any lawful contactmade by a law enforcement officer or agency of this state or county,city,townshipor sub divisionof this state where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is a n alien who is unlawfully present in the u.s. an attempt shall be made where practible to determine the immigration status of the person. the persons status shall be verified with the fed. govt.pursuant to 8 u.s. code section 1373 (c). where is the problem again?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte way to take things out of context. the part you are describing is about employers knowingly employing illegals. it says any complaints shall be submitted on a prescribed complaint form. in other words do it on the proper paperwork. sounds like a clerical procedure to me. you stated the law is bigoted. i gave you verbatim the enforcement mechanism right there on the first page. now explain to me the part of that is racist?
@jhamm999 Well, you stayed on topic, for once. After that, you are as full of shit, as ever. I took nothing out of context and I think, this time, even you know it. That may be why you try so hard to obscure meaning behind your "out-of-context," "in-other-words," and "sounds-to-me-like" dodges. Also, you have misread, misinterpreted, misquoted, misinformed, and misdirected so much that any attempt you make interpret anything is absurdly transparent. 1070 is an invitation to abuse, as I said.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte you use four words out of a whole page concerning a description of a law. yeah,that is what a person that has a brain stem calls taking out of context. or someone that is not filled with rage and hatred like you. i suppose it is a little of both coming from you though.
@jhamm999 Now, that is not exactly true, is it? I did not use four words but rather twenty words. And, I gave you the exact page and the lines, which means that I gave you the entre context. But, your tactic to isolate or bury according to your need is especially misinformed on this occasion. Out of those twenty words, I was highlighting just one: "...solely..." as I explained earlier. Your efforts to isolate 1070 here, and bury its treatment of race there, expose your racist agenda, yet again.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte those four words on line 28 does not tell the intention of the bill. that is what is called taking things out of context. do i really have to explain this to you? btw when you used the term 'anglo-centric' what is that code word for?
@jhamm999 I believe you mean: "those two words on line 28 DO not tell ..." Your syntax is as bad as your logic.
Find another dog for that bone! The only two parts of that bill/law that discuss race were not hidden well enough nor disguised well enough to obscure the racist intentions of the bill/law's proponents. Heap the whole 16 pages onto your context pile. The racism still stands out. You should have thought of this dodge before maintaining that 1070 prohibits racial profiling.
@jhamm999 ... What is more, you lied —as usual— when you claim that I said that 1070 is a racist law. I said that the immigration issue is about race and that the term "illegal" has become a codeword for "spic" and "beaner" and other slurs for Hispanic people, and that 1070 is evidence of that racist energy. I did not isolate it, as you have tried to do, but, rather, grouped it together with other bills/laws moving AZ, piece-meal, toward their desired form of Apartheid.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte well let us review some facts,although that is a foreign concept to you,but try antway. do you deny saying the bill was written by fair,which you slander as a racist group? or russell pearce was a racist? logic follows,another foreign concept for you i'm sure that s.b.1070 is a racist law. you also stated that the laws are made are born out of racism.( paraphrasing but correct in it's meaning). so quit lying dip shit.
@jhamm999 Facts, foreign to me? As I recall, I lead you in facts 25-0. Calling FAIR a hate group is not slander, it is documented fact. And Russell Pearce has racist connections a mile long. If this is the direction you plan to take, you are in big trouble, quicksand-like trouble. Your Klan tutor should teach you a bit about research, because you suck at it!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte you say it is a documented fact,but yet you give me no documentation. you learn well from your racist la raza teacher. or is that from your mother?
@jhamm999 How did Tupac Enrique get into this? I offered to help him write his speeches once. If you have heard him talk you can tell that he, obviously, did not take me up on the offer. I guess he thought it would make him sound too scholarly.
@jhamm999 For better insight, you should hear the one by Dr. Matthew Whitaker. He and I come about as close to thinking the other's thoughts as anybody else.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ginesdepasamonte i saw his video and he seems to be bemoaning the fact that our immigration policy has changed from anyone who wants to come to actually having laws governing it. what he fails to see that in our infancy as a country we needed people and didn't really care,because they actually tried to assimilate. times have changed and we cannot have such a permissive policy today,i trust you understand that. the solution is for people to fight for their own country so they don't have to leav
Colbert can walk on water.
newmantopia 2 weeks ago
He took the typical route of misapplying Matthew 25 to those that are bad off or in need. This passage has nothing to do with a social gospel as so many claim it does. Read the passage in context-the judgement has already taken place in this text. The "brothers" are believers, not people who need help with being fed, given water, etc. How unsurprising.
rorshakks 1 month ago
@rorshakks What so ever you do for the least of my brothers, you do for me. Which means bad or good, he was using it out of context perhaps but he proved his point, so who cares?
chrissup19 1 month ago
I wish Colbert would be president <3
xTheEmilyx 2 months ago
this is great.
aquabat104 8 months ago
if jesus crossed the rio grande, or overstayed his visa, or run away from a cruise ship . . . and worked as a carpenter. i will look up matthew 25 , for guidance.
kukz65 1 year ago 4
@kukz65 No instead He lived His entire life knowing He would die for everybody bearing the sins of the world on His body. He suffered shock, beatings, brutality, suffocation, dehydration, crucifixion, flogging, mockery, He had everything but gave it up for the people of the world to be with them. He should have been welcomed but His own people rejected Him. Watch what you say about the Bible. It has more guidance than you know for anything.
Boxer4Christ 6 months ago
@Boxer4Christ The Bible is the #1 selling fiction book in history.
kvdsmlfkjds 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Debate Results:
It has been an interesting debate. I have determined the winner based on speaker points, effectiveness, and evidence. The results are as follows.
ginesdepasamonte: Highly passionate, proper grammar, but excessive personalized conjecture.
jhamm999: Very spirited, proper diplomacy, and overwhelming empirical evidence.
The conclusive winner is - jhamm999
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
Comment removed
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Debate Results:
It has been an interesting debate. I have determined the winner based on speaker points, effectiveness, and evidence. The results are as follows.
ginesdepasamonte: Highly passionate, proper grammar, but excessive personalized conjecture.
jhamm999: Very spirited, proper diplomacy, and overwhelming empirical evidence.
The conclusive winner is - jhamm999
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
Comment removed
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
Comment removed
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
Comment removed
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
Comment removed
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte
The only reason we dignify your utter silliness is for the entertainment value. You're potentially a classic example of an idiot-savant, in that you put together impressive sentences but you're unable to put together sophisticated thoughts. On the other hand, I haven't ruled out the possibility that in your lonely old life you endlessly sit at your PC getting drunker & drunker & drunker. This reality might better explain your perpetual ignorance and bigoted demeanor.
????
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FynalAuthority What you fail to understand is that those Klansmen with whom you share ideas do not count as discerning minds. Most of their minds have been damaged, as has yours, through generations of inbreeding. The same observation is in order concerning the Nazis with whom you did time. And each time you dodge any real dialog with this Brown Shirts tactic of displacing your racism upon the victims of that bigotry, you reveal yourself for what you are: A racist simpleton without humanity.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
wow my respect for this man just shot up!
AlbertChyn 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte
Yep, you're right, I made a gratuitous typo and you have the prerogative to rub it in. I failed to edit myself and didn't proof read my spell corrector. Nonetheless, your replies remain steadfastly consistent with a lack intellectualism and an abundance of superficial criticism. The fact remains that you desperately lack workable substance and your only recourse is to ridicule grammar and/or make incredulous statements against the majority of White America.
You lose - again!
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
@FynalAuthority I thought that was you. Cowering behind yet another screen name, I see. It was to be expected. And you have found a new playmate, congratulations. You two should get along well. Think of the great times yáll will have at the KKK cookouts. His posting style is not so churrigueresque as is yours but, he is a big fan of the Mac-across-the-net tactic, your favorite and his. As for the rest of your post, well, just more Mac-across-the-net. To be expected.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte I have read from many fools on YouTube before, but never have I met someone as persistently foolish as you. You are cognitively flat and intellectually inept with your only armament of calling people bigots and klansman. Most children can argue with more meaningful substance than you can. I don't know who you are but I am grateful you're not my neighbor because your stupidity and anti-social ways would significantly lower the property value of the neighborhood.
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FynalAuthority More Mac-across-the-net... At least you are consistent, and consistently a dolt.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte Could it be entirely true that you are capable of nothing more than slandering White America with your irresponsible name-calling, as well as imagining you know people you've never met? Could it be that you're not only woefully dumb, but that you're also legitimately deranged? I'm sincerely starting to feel sympathy for you and your congenital condition(s).
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FynalAuthority More Mac-across-the-net...
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 2
Matthew 25 is a brilliant piece of moral, and I say that as an atheist. Too often atheists, when attacking religion, forget that sometimes religion gets it right.
Matthew 25 is one of those cases. Those who help the needy, the poor, the sick, are truly "gods people,"
bersaba 1 year ago 3
Wow...such a good point. If only more of the so called Christians in Congress would truly think of "the least" of this country a little more often. 10 points Mr. Colbert
PurpleFuzzEhippyGirl 1 year ago 2
Here in Australia it's illegal to work as a tourist and it's illegal to "hire" someone without tax, super etc... but (aparently, I'm not an expert just what I heard) it's not illegal to "trade" board and food etc for work. That is, a tourist can come here and pick fruit for a week then for two weeks worth of food and accomodation. (For instance).
Great loophole.
bersaba 1 year ago
This is why the Repugs are so angry about his appearance. They all go on about what great Christians they are, but they're full of shit. So, when someone comes along who actually follows the teachings of Christ, it pisses them off.
Oh, and for the sake of bipartisanship: Steny Hoyer can go fuck himself.
sweetfatman 1 year ago 6
brilliant answer for an unexpected question!
teacherwin1 1 year ago 3
Not one word of this clip will ever be seen on FOX news.
So much for fair and balanced.
Fox News and the right wing media is SHIT!
reasonable71 1 year ago 3
Colbert is not a very religious man, he plays the role as a all-american god-fearing patriot. This line fits with that greatly. He is basically using the bible against those who oppose the migrant workers the most. The religious southerns.
jimius 1 year ago
@jimius No, he actually is very religious. He comes from a family of devout Catholics and, outside of his character, has expressed that his family are all practicing and church-going.
Y0utubeHipHop 1 year ago 2
@jimius He is actually very religious and teaches Sunday school.
Ninjical 1 year ago
This man is a DemiGod!
SickBoyZap5 1 year ago
The essential truth. bravo. Yeah Jesus.
tonytonytonyargh 1 year ago 3
This is amazing! Go Stephen!
gopblows 1 year ago 3
To those who think the immigration process is "easy" and that undocumented workers do not pay taxes, I can tell you that this is most definitely NOT the case. Legal immigration is nearly impossible under our current system, especially for those from south of the border. And they DO pay taxes. Many pay into our system and will never see a single dime back. They also pay sales taxes, just like everyone else. As @MarkRosengarten said, most migrant workers are little more than under-the-table slaves
HuskiesRuleMyHome 1 year ago 5
LOL in your face racist redneck
seethishardtube 1 year ago 4
Matthew 25 is one text you never hear a Republican quote!
ffirb 1 year ago 7
@bill4588 You apparently have never been through the immigration process. It's not "easily" done for any immigrant, Latino or otherwise, but I can tell you that Latino immigrants do have a harder time with the process than, say, Canadian immigrants. Also, the number of undocumented immigrants who have been filing for federal income tax has been rising. Undocumented immigrants want citizenship; they've built ties to their communities and built families here.
wacojesus 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
most illegals dont really want citizenship...they want to come here, make a lot of TAX FREE money and then go back home. any illegal who wants to be a citizen can easily do so, the legal way.
bill4588 1 year ago
Even if I sometimes disagree with him politically, I want to thank Mr. Colbert for standing up for these people and mentioning the Gospel in front of Congress. God knows they need more of that.
Itugen88 1 year ago 4
M$M keeping this from hitting the air for the most part. What a great thing Mr. Colbert has done and is doing. A true American.
Deposetheboyking 1 year ago 4
if the least of our brothers would come here legally then they would not expose themselves to such exploitation.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 as if the exploiters just can't help themselves, they have to exploit. As if we can let them all in here legally if they so choose, as if they aren't wanted here for their cheap labor, which is a result of them being here illegally.
stargleamer 1 year ago 4
@stargleamer no,they are here illegally because they choose to not obey our laws. millions before them have come here legally and have become good citizens.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999
I hate people like you. you dont realize its pretty damn near impossible to come here legally. it takes so fucking long. If they waited they would starve to death. And what laws do they break? which laws do they no obey?
cuishi14 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@cuishi14 then why have millions of others done it einstein? they break the law by crossing the border illegally. they are called illegal immigrants for a reason.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Oh, for what reason?
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte ummm,thta would be because they crossed the borders without going through the legal channels. you really did not know that?
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 I'm sure that any reasonable person would rather that everything were done in such a way that all reasonable legalities were satisfied but, when those legal channels become so exigent that educated people with resources have trouble complying, while the uneducated without resources find it almost impossible, it is time for a nation of immigrants to show some understanding. Also, the employers who need these workers have an equally difficult time complying with immigration laws.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 92
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte i'm all for streamlining the process so people who want to come here can do so easier. what i'm against is letting them come here illegally,which would be unfair to the millions who obeyed our laws. we need to close the border,then we can set up a smart guest worker program. but most of all helping our neighbors to the south to control the drug cartels,get rid of corruption in their govt,so the law abiding citizens would not feel the need to come here in the first place.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 I would hate to be your neighbor. Fairplay is not what these reactionary laws and campagns are about. There is little or no compitition between the labor markets into which those who attempt to immigrate through legal means try to enter and those into which the undocumented move. "Illegal" is a code word for "spic" or "beaner" or whatever slur you like. It is once again the powerful abusing the powerless. The hate comes first, then it is sold as "fairplay" or "rule of law." WABOS!
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 24
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte i was wondering when the race baiting would start. just because you obviously don't respect the law doesn't mean everyone else has to.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 And, what is it that makes that obvious? On the other hand, your so called "race baiting" has a great deal of ammunition to use. A movement which does not wish to wish to be seen as racist does not have a hate group write its laws; it does not get neo-Nazis to put on its rallies; it does not ask racists to sponsor the bills written by that hate group; it does not lie to its public; et cetera. No, I think that the the movement was custom made for racists. Is that your interest in it?
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte yes the idiocy of your argument saying if you want the border to be sealed is code word for spic,or beaner. that is intellectually bankrupt as well. if you don't like the laws change them. what movement are you talking about? lulac,la raza,those racist groups? i say put the military on the border to back up the fence when we build it. if you want to see a hypocrite nation check out mexico's immigration policy.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 I never said that the a concern for the border was code for “spic” and “beaner,” et cetera. I said that the use of the term “illegal” has become tantamount to those racist slurs. Your prevarication shows a perceived impotence with your own argument. La Raza did not write SB 1070, FAIR did. Once again, your evasions have proven to be a spent force.
What about Mexico's policy? Is it so good that we should adopt it? Is it so bad that we should should be worse, out of vindictiveness? ...?
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte the use of the word illegal as in illegal immigrant is used to describe a person who came here illegally,or once was here legally and overstayed their visa and have not left the country. it doesn't matter if they are from mexico or canada. illegal is illegal. as far as s.b. 1070,have you read the bill? it actually is less stringent than the federal law .
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 I am perfectly aware of the word’s denotation and I am also aware of the legal connections behind which the border bigots wish to hide. (BTW, you used a plural possessive with a singular antecedent.) Still, the connotation, which you have tried to obscure, remains exactly as I described it earlier. That was an unsuccessful dodge, I’m afraid.
Yes, I have read SB 1070 many times but, even if I hadn’t read it, it was still written by FAIR.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte 'the border bigots'. and you still claim that you said people who want to secure the borders are not bigots? please. o.k. so you are for open borders. change the law. you,like many libs totally make slurs,call people racists taht disagree with you because you can't argue the facts. s.b. 1071 states that a police officer cannot check on the status unless they are in the ordinary call of duty. someone gets stopped,asked for i.d. and present a az. d.l. everything is fine.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 I have no trouble arguing the facts. Bring them on. That would represent a welcome change, if you can stay on topic. I am getting tired of your perpetually dodging and changing the line of discussion.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte you are the one that is factually challenged my friend. i gave you facts about s.b. 1070. so refute them if you can.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 What's the matter, no guts? Yes, bigots are usually cowards too, so I guess it was not unexpected that you should turn out to be both. But, since you wish to provide no facts, even though it was you who brought up the challenge, I am more than happy to begin.
Fact 1: The USA is a nation of immigrants.
Fact 2: The US and Mexico are neighbors.
Fact 3: The border between the US and Mexico is not a natural border nor a human border but rather a political border.
Following so far?
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte no the gutless ones are people like you,who deny the basic fact that coutries have a right to their own soveriegnity. there is nothing in your facts that are earthshaking,so tell me something i don't know. a FACT for you. we get to decide our immigration laws,no one else. and unless you come into this country through legal channels you are here illegally. and the continued intellectually bankrupt race baiting pablum you spill out will not change those FACTS. understand that?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 You will have to produce evidence of my having denied any such thing. In the event that you should fail to produce such a denial, I will conclude that this is just one more attempt to obfuscate and evade so greater scrutiny will not expose flaws in positions that you have adopted.
Fact 4: Illegal immigration has a long history in the US.
Fact 5: Illegal immigrants who write laws that legalize their own status are also compromised by that status.
Now, try to keep up...
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte 1- who are you talking about in our history when you say illegal immigration has a long history in our country?
you try to deny our right to shut down the borders from illegals by saying what you just said. just admit that you believe in open borders.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 FACTS 6-12
1492 — Columbus
1502 — Slave traffic begins big
1607 — English colony built in Jamestown
1619 — African indentured servants (Jamestown)
1700-1776 — First large immigrant wave (European, primarily English; 1750 sees population of 1 million; 1790 sees 4 million)
1820-1870 — Second large immigrant wave (about 7.5 million from northern and western Europe)
1882 — Bigoted Chinese Exclusion Act (19th Century version of 1070) is passed in order to prevent Chinese immigration.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 9
@jhamm999 Fact 13: The Statue of Liberty was unveiled in 1886. Fact 14: Ellis Island opened in 1892. Fact 15: One million immigrants passed through Ellis Island in 1907. Fact 16: Elis island is closed in 1954.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte the examples you gave was when we basically had no immigration laws. we were still an infant nation. and to compare the chinese exclusion act to s.b.1070. tells me you are not familiar with s.b. 1070 at all.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 Fact 17: 1881-1920: Third large wave of immigration saw about 23.5 million, mainly southern and eastern european, immigrants arrive. Fact 18: Congress requires immigrants to pass literacy tests in 1917. Fact 19: In a bigoted act of Congress, immigrant numbers were limited by nationality.
Bigotry and immigration policy seem to love each other's company. Does that explain your interest?
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte like i said each country sets it's own policy. todays laws do not discriminate. if you are here illegally it doesn't matter what country you are from. your history recall is nice,but it doesn't pertain to the situation today. we also had blacks on plantations once but not today. so if you wouldn't mind try to to come into this century?
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 You are such a hypocrite; you ask for facts from others but provide only surmise and wild conjecture. Ethics is so alien to you! (BTW: You used “like” as a conjunction.)
Fact 20: Operation Wetback was a bigoted 1954 operation by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to remove about one million Mexican, Mexican American, and others deemed not white enough, from the southwestern United States. (Another precursor to SB 1070.)
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte we were discussing s.b. 1070 and then you go on this tangebt about historical legislation,to prove what point? you cannot defeat the logic of immigration laws so you name call and obfuscate yourself. i think the term i'm looking for is projection. wake me when you get into the 21st century. zzzzzzzzz.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 Still nothing to contribute, I see. Just more Mac-across-the-net tactics, and to think, you asked for facts, now you want to start with logic? Any time.
Fact 21: SB 1070 was written by the hate group FAIR.
Fact 22: SB 1070 was sponsored by an Arizona congressman with ties to racist organizations, Russell Pearce.
Fact 23: The same racist players involved in SB 1070, were also involved with ending ethnic studies in Arizona and in the firing of Arizona teachers with accents.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte fair is a hate group for wanting to enforce the law? is that your point,mr ad hominem? laughable. last time i checked fair was not in the congress so cannot write legislation. and before i forget the thing you said that set it off was people who were illegally should not be writing immigration laws,or words to that effect. for your info our founders that came here there were no immigration laws. now there are. that is why i found your posts amusing.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Do not ask me why FAIR chose to organize around bigotry and xenophobia. Their interest in the law, on the other hand, has to do with making laws conform to their bigotries and xenophobia.
You should go back to the illiterate Klansman who home-schooled you and ask for another lesson in civics. Anybody can write a bill. It is then congress which processes that bill toward becoming a law. The rest of your post is unintelligible. Please restate. Quote my posts if you must.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte public school trained so tyhat answers your first slanderous attack. and you are the one who needs a remedial course in civics as well as the constitution. 1st amendment gives citizens the right to redress the govt. for threir grievances. so while fair and other people who want to be good americans and enforce the laws ,it is up to the congress to act,or not to act upon them. don't blame me because you open borders crowd didn't get your way and is now having a conniption fit.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 This is entirely too one sided. You ask for facts, but provide none (you are behind 23-0). Then you ask for logic while showing yourself incapable the most elementary levels of reading comprehension... Must I do all the heavy lifting here? No need to answer that; facts and logic are obviously too exigent for your bigot's brain to comprehend.
Fact 24: In order that a Bill (written by anybody) should become Law, it must be presented to Congress.
Try not to confuse bill with law again.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte how can i have a intelligent debate with someone that actually thinks a group of unelected citizens come into a legislature and writes a law? go back to civics 101 and talk to me then.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 You cannot have an “intelligent debate” with anybody because you are a slow-witted cretin! To my knowledge, nobody here has maintained that any “group of unelected citizens [has] come into a legislature and writ[ten] a[ny] law.” That is your own fabrication. I certainly never said that SL 1070 was written by FAIR; I said that SB 1070 was written by FAIR, as it was. Your difficulty with cognitive skills may stem from the inbreeding having produced a bantam brain. Cubic capacity...
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte point taken now how can they write the legislative language for the bill which eventually became law. your gross and wrong headed assumptions are mind boggling. also what do you think of the 1940 law signed by fdr which it's enforcement mechanism is far tougher than s.b.1070?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 I have few problems with strict regulation, per se. I bewail and deplore the engrossment of xenophobic odium in the law making process, and condemn it equally under FDR or Eisenhower or Reagan or Obama, ... Yet, this climate of bigotry is assiduously afoot each time Congress addresses our immigration policy. What is worse, once again, racism constitutes the chief motivating factor for drawing attention to the issue. Bigotry before justice, well-being or fair-play. WABOS!
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte what does wabos mean? second why do you automatically assign insidious motives to people who simply want to control the border which is every countries right? if the law is enforced equally,meaning if an illegal is from mexico,sweden,japan,regardless why do you object? i'll ask you,what would you do if you had the power to write our immigration laws?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 WABOS! = What a bunch of shit!
Your second question is premature. To my knowledge, you have not yet established that I do anything "automatically," let alone "assign insidious motives to people who simply want to control the border." To what people do you refer?
If I had the power to write our immigration laws, I would first hold a series of public discussions to determine foundation. A nation of immigrants, the US, has a unique relationship with the dynamic that other nations do not.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte With all do respect, the other guy out debated you in principle and logic. In case you're not aware, the terms racist and bigot have lost their intrinsic value as a result of superficial usage by persons like you. The only thing of substantive value you have proven is that there is a new and growing cult of hateful Hispanics just like you.
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FynalAuthority "With all do respect..."? Maybe you mean "... all dew respect..."? Well, whatever you mean, with all due respect, your Mac-across-the-net attempt was all too (not "to" or "two" or even "tú") transparent and came way (or is it "weigh"?) too late in the match for it to serve your purpose. Maybe next time (not "thyme").
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@FynalAuthority he can't stand losing can he?
jhamm999 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm999 Yep, that's right. This guy is intellectually useless because he is not capable of separating his own unadulterated bigotry from an otherwise good faith and objective discussion. Once a person gets past the frustration level they'll often find these types of YouTube Bozos to be highly laughable.
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@FynalAuthority he has a set of values that he wishes not to expose for some reason. i think it is because he is a open border guy at heart. he doesn't understand we are not the same country that we were over 100 years ago.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm999 Too many people try to blackmail and coerce America with the ineffective argument that because America was once necessitated by immigrants that it must therefore forever maintain endless open borders for any and all people to come and go as they please. What's so inept about these ill-informed proponents is their juvenile ignorance in not knowing that every civilization in every corner of the world has a beginninig history of people having relocated themselves at one time or another.
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm 999 Assuming this maniac is a guy, he's not only an open-borders monger but he's also a non-sequitur fool. Now he's saying you and I are KKK playmates. It is sure obvious how he substitutes foolishness for substantiveness when defeated in principle. I don't know whether to play with this moron for a while or just leave him alone in his minuscule world of hate and ignorance.
hmmmm ?????????????????
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@FynalAuthority fools resort to name calling when they run out of intellectual ammo. i think we should follow my late mom's advice when she said never get into a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
jhamm999 1 year ago
Comment removed
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm999 Your Mother (God Rest Her Soul) was a smart woman. My Dad (God Rest His Soul) told me something very similar. He said - "Learn to smile upon fools rather than frown upon their shortcomings."
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@FynalAuthority sounds like we had the good fortune of being raised by two great people.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte well lets see,you call them xenophobes,bigots i,e, s.b.1070 supporters. and you wonder why i said what i said? what foundation do you wish to determine? lets start with the premise that any country has the right to make their own immigration laws. what is wrong with my notion that we seal off the borders using the military if necessary build the wall. then try to get as many illegals in the country out now,streamline the laws,work out a solid guest worker program.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 I call xenophobes and bigots xenophobes and bigots, so what? And I still “wonder [...] why [you] said what [you] said.” As I recall, you asked that we deal in facts but then provided none. Then, you asked for logic but offered only surmise, convulsive conjecture, obfuscation, and character assassination. You conclude without the benefit of evidence and change directions before any depth can be attained.
BTW: You used a plural possessive with a singular antecedent, again.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte but you call people those names for the reason they support laws like s.b. 1070. now you are simply lying to not only me but yourself. then you have the nerve to say i engage in character assassination when you tell me i'm a klansman? tell me is your i.q. above room temperature? never mind i won this argument a long time ago when you started using invectives. you sir are a poppinjay.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 You should learn to read. It should be easy with all the posts in front of you. Your bigotry and your bantam brain seems to have trouble following a linear discussion. I thought that you did it deliberately before, in order prevent in depth treatment of a topic, so that you might follow up by calling my treatment of that topic superficial. However, now I believe that you are simply not smart enough to carry on a simple conversation or read and understand a simple post. Go join FAIR.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@ginesdepasamonte there you go again. you spew your racial invective then lie and deny when you get called on it. why do you hate america?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 I almost missed this. Somebody flagged it as spam. I hope it was an accident. Your posts are filled with betise, but they are certainly not spam.
As fo my denials, all you have to do is produce evidence of your accusations. My posts are right in front of you. Until that time, keep ducking and dodging.
Fact 25: FAIR founder, John Tanton, is a nativist whose bigotries are reserved primarily, though not exclusively, for Catholics, and Latinos, in general, and Hispanics, in particular.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte fact-70% of arizonans support s.b. 1070. including a sizable portion of the hispanic community.
fact-60% of americans support s.b. 1070. but i guess to you they are all abunch of xenophobes,racists,bigots. man up and say your sorry for calling us names that we do not deserve and maybe you will earn a measure of respect.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 You forgot to mention which poll you are quoting. For all I know, you may be quoting your KKK poll. According to the poll conducted by the Behavior Research Center (BRC) in Phoenix, support for 1070 stands at 52 percent in favor to 39 percent opposed and 9 percent unsure. Among registered voters, 56 percent favor while 34 percent oppose the immigration law. Wow! You can't even do facts.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte gallup poll. and you sure do ad hominems good still. but i'm sure you will deny that you ever said it. are you related to bill clinton in that respect? you are out of ammo douchebag so give it up. even in your poll you lose. so keep om telling me how your not spewing racial invectives and trying to stay on the high ground. someday even you might bekieve it.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Want me to say I’m sorry? Very well: I'm sorry that you're a xenophobe and a bigot. I’m sorry the mere mention of racial inequities sends your Anglo-centric persecution complex into a frenzy and, before looking into verity, you immediately circle the wagons of the Caucasian caravan. I’m sorry you find detestation preferable to amicability, and whipping boys to consorts. I’m sorry you feel that racism in a mob trumps virtue in a crowd. I’m sorry, mostly, for your lack of humanity.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte and let me say i'm sorry. sorry for giving you the benefit of the doubt you were at least a smart liberal capable of carrying on a conversation without resorting to the default system of calling people racists because they disagree with you. i'm sorry that you cannot respect the rule of law. i'm sorry that have no reasoning skills. but i'm really sorry that you assume so much about me when you know nothing. that is truly a sign of a feeble mind.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 How can you say that I “assume so much about [you] when [I] know nothing”? I know a good deal. For example, I know that you claim the undocumented “are here illegally because they choose to not obey our laws” and that you provide no evidence for that claim other than that “millions of others done.” I know that Mac-across-the-net and head-in-the-sand are almost exclusively your tactics for dealing the race issues involved. I know your syntax stinks.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte i said they are illegally because they do not come here by following our laws as to how to get here legally. by walking across the border does not mean you are here legally,or are you really that dense?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Don't try to bail now; that was a quote taken from your own post.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte do you know anything at all about our laws? you see someone cross the border and not go through the legal channels that makes them illegal. but then again by your pretzel logic that is a racist term. how sad that you have no sense or command of the english language. btw what makes you assume i'm white? is it because you cannot imagine that a black or hispanic can ever have these views.?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 White, Black, Brown, Red, or Yellow, your views are still bigoted and Anglo-centric.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte project much do you?
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 I know that you avoid upper case letters. I know your propensity for false syllogisms (e.g.: I actually said those who wrote and sponsored SB 1070 were bigots, so you claim that I called everybody who supports it a bigot). I know that you have a hard time distinguishing between a bill and a law. I know that you try to speak for me (e.g.: “... you are for open borders”). I know that your reading comprehension is dreadful. I know that your idea of history has an Anglo colonial prejudice.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte well if you think s.b. 1070 was a racist law then #1-prove it and#2 -it follows that the people who support such a racist law must be racist right? it's called putting 2+2 together. in fact you already have me pegged as a klansman. 'anglo colonial prtejudice'. such hateful bigoted speech for a liberal. tsk,tsk.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Since you're anxious to make 1070 the topic, I’m happy to share my perspective. First, those involved with the bill forward —FAIR, Russell Pearce, J. T. Ready, et cetera— have deep racist roots. Second, 1070 did not go through alone but with a nimiety of other bills with divisive intentions, e.g.: the censorship of ethnic studies and the firing of teachers with accents, all sold after the murder of a rancher. Politicians incited a racist lynch mob, yet nobody knows who his killer is.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte that was our original starting point yes. you say they are racists because you saw them standing next to a person in a neo-nazi meeting. okay,i guess that means that obama hates america because he sat in rev. wright's church for 20 years. or because he knew bill ayers. see how guilt by association cuts both ways.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 What? "...because you saw them standing next ro a person in a neo-nazi meeting." I do not remember ever having said such a thing. I do not remember your ever even asking. Just the latest attempt to speak for me, pulled right out of the trailer court air. What a bloody coward you are. And don't think I didn't notice how far off topic this stupidity is taking us. You whine because we are not talking about 1070 but, when we do, you change the subject. Haven't gotten to the law itself yet.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte did you not send me a link that showed that? someone did. you want to talk about the law finally bozo? be glad to. show me where the racism is when it forbids racial profiling,states that the only way a officer can inquire about a persons status is in the normal duty the person does not present a valid i.d. what is bigoted about that?
jhamm999 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm999
People like the "g-monster" always resort to false charges of racism when they have been intellectually defeated in principle. This pathetic tactic is quickly becoming one of the oldest tricks in the books, and its buffoonery is not only frustrating those who are innocently accused but it's also angering serious minded individuals who have legitimate concerns but are finding their credibility compromised because of loose screws like the "g-monster."
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@FynalAuthority he was intellectually bankrupt from the beginning. he has the hate whitey talking points down pat but when knowledgeable people like you and i confront him he folds like a bad poker hand.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm999 Yep, we got 'em alright
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@FynalAuthority no problem.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm999
I'm sure there's something good about the old man, but not when it comes to his being confused about SB1070. Profiling is what helps circumvent the crimes of terrorists, klansmen, panthers, illegal aliens, and a whole host of other criminals. If millions of Canadians were illegally crossing the borders and creating chaos & havoc in the northern states, I bet there would not be frivilous charges of racism, and I bet ginesdepasamonte would be the first one to defend the Northern law.
FynalAuthority 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@FynalAuthority that is the problem with someone who deals in rhetoric and not facts or critical thinking. i bet he would be against keeping a closer eye on muslims at the airport check in.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 I never sent you any link; all my posts are right in front of you, illiterate moron. "Finally"? WABOS! All you had to do is ask, instead of claiming to have made it a topic without ever truly having done so.
The final form of 1070 is far less overtly racist than the first drafts submitted, nevertheless, much racism remains. Let's go to page 6 where the document says that race may not be the ONLY factor. That leaves only 1%; which could come from anything, 1%. Invitation to abuse!
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte you told me to google the guys name and i did. that is what i found. try to lie out of that.
jhamm999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhamm999 You really are pathetic! First you get caught in yet another lie, then you try to squirm out by accusing me of future lies. Mac-across-the-net seems more than a tactic to you, it’s an addiction. WABOS!
You need to lie more boldly. Take a tip from your fellow border bigots: lie proudly and publicly, and wait for their being inevitably exposed. In this way your constituents will know your meaning. The lie is part of the code. It says that the bigotry comes first, and justice be damned.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte you are either a congenital oliar or you suffer from short term memory loss. either way you are useless and don't belong in a rational debate. now i suppose you are saying it is bigotry to enforce the wabos.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 You wouldn't recognize a rational debate if it were implanted into your inbred brain. And what the hell is an "oliar"?
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte misspelling vs a liar? i'll take misspelling.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 For somebody who was so anxious to talk about 1070, you certainly jumped off that ship in a hurry! And we hadn't even gotten to the part of the bill/law that compares the undocumented to a "rat infestation." What a bloody hypocrite you are!
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte no you still haven't answered my question. what part of 'no racial profiling' does your addled brain not understand?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Why should that particular question interfere with our discussion of 1070? What have they to do with 1070? I understand those words perfectly. Wouldn't it be nice if 1070 used them. Instead, it says "The attorney general or county attorney shall not investigate complaints that are based solely on race, color or national origin" as I have already pointed out.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte s.b.1070 sec. 2b.-for any lawful contactmade by a law enforcement officer or agency of this state or county,city,townshipor sub divisionof this state where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is a n alien who is unlawfully present in the u.s. an attempt shall be made where practible to determine the immigration status of the person. the persons status shall be verified with the fed. govt.pursuant to 8 u.s. code section 1373 (c). where is the problem again?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 ...and again, and again...
p.6
28 submitted on a prescribed complaint form. The attorney general or county
29 attorney shall not investigate complaints that are based solely on race,
30 color or national origin.
That illiterate Klan tutor of yours did your reading skills way too much damage.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte way to take things out of context. the part you are describing is about employers knowingly employing illegals. it says any complaints shall be submitted on a prescribed complaint form. in other words do it on the proper paperwork. sounds like a clerical procedure to me. you stated the law is bigoted. i gave you verbatim the enforcement mechanism right there on the first page. now explain to me the part of that is racist?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Well, you stayed on topic, for once. After that, you are as full of shit, as ever. I took nothing out of context and I think, this time, even you know it. That may be why you try so hard to obscure meaning behind your "out-of-context," "in-other-words," and "sounds-to-me-like" dodges. Also, you have misread, misinterpreted, misquoted, misinformed, and misdirected so much that any attempt you make interpret anything is absurdly transparent. 1070 is an invitation to abuse, as I said.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte you use four words out of a whole page concerning a description of a law. yeah,that is what a person that has a brain stem calls taking out of context. or someone that is not filled with rage and hatred like you. i suppose it is a little of both coming from you though.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Now, that is not exactly true, is it? I did not use four words but rather twenty words. And, I gave you the exact page and the lines, which means that I gave you the entre context. But, your tactic to isolate or bury according to your need is especially misinformed on this occasion. Out of those twenty words, I was highlighting just one: "...solely..." as I explained earlier. Your efforts to isolate 1070 here, and bury its treatment of race there, expose your racist agenda, yet again.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte those four words on line 28 does not tell the intention of the bill. that is what is called taking things out of context. do i really have to explain this to you? btw when you used the term 'anglo-centric' what is that code word for?
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 I believe you mean: "those two words on line 28 DO not tell ..." Your syntax is as bad as your logic.
Find another dog for that bone! The only two parts of that bill/law that discuss race were not hidden well enough nor disguised well enough to obscure the racist intentions of the bill/law's proponents. Heap the whole 16 pages onto your context pile. The racism still stands out. You should have thought of this dodge before maintaining that 1070 prohibits racial profiling.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 6
@jhamm999 ... What is more, you lied —as usual— when you claim that I said that 1070 is a racist law. I said that the immigration issue is about race and that the term "illegal" has become a codeword for "spic" and "beaner" and other slurs for Hispanic people, and that 1070 is evidence of that racist energy. I did not isolate it, as you have tried to do, but, rather, grouped it together with other bills/laws moving AZ, piece-meal, toward their desired form of Apartheid.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 25
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte well let us review some facts,although that is a foreign concept to you,but try antway. do you deny saying the bill was written by fair,which you slander as a racist group? or russell pearce was a racist? logic follows,another foreign concept for you i'm sure that s.b.1070 is a racist law. you also stated that the laws are made are born out of racism.( paraphrasing but correct in it's meaning). so quit lying dip shit.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 Facts, foreign to me? As I recall, I lead you in facts 25-0. Calling FAIR a hate group is not slander, it is documented fact. And Russell Pearce has racist connections a mile long. If this is the direction you plan to take, you are in big trouble, quicksand-like trouble. Your Klan tutor should teach you a bit about research, because you suck at it!
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte you say it is a documented fact,but yet you give me no documentation. you learn well from your racist la raza teacher. or is that from your mother?
jhamm999 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jhamm999 or possibly tupac enrique? bwahahaha what a fool both you and tupac are. come back when you graduate from junior high, little boy.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 How did Tupac Enrique get into this? I offered to help him write his speeches once. If you have heard him talk you can tell that he, obviously, did not take me up on the offer. I guess he thought it would make him sound too scholarly.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago 3
@ginesdepasamonte just browsing your channel. it gave me a good insight into your thinking.
jhamm999 1 year ago
@jhamm999 For better insight, you should hear the one by Dr. Matthew Whitaker. He and I come about as close to thinking the other's thoughts as anybody else.
ginesdepasamonte 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ginesdepasamonte i saw his video and he seems to be bemoaning the fact that our immigration policy has changed from anyone who wants to come to actually having laws governing it. what he fails to see that in our infancy as a country we needed people and didn't really care,because they actually tried to assimilate. times have changed and we cannot have such a permissive policy today,i trust you understand that. the solution is for people to fight for their own country so they don't have to leav
jhamm999 1 year ago