No qualifications, she is not a scientist or dermatoligist. I would find more credibility in someones opinion who has actually helped develop these products in the industry. Plus she changes her opinion while the big companies are already ahead of her, she was once against anti-oxidants being in skincare!
To be honest i just can stand the woman, she really paints a good vs bad guy image but in the end she is just as bad pluggin her own products and using consumer ignorance to her advantage
Is it just me or does this woman appear to have a serious vendetta against big cosmetis companies? So what if L'Oreal and Estee lauder own most of the brands on the market? Good for them! They also have the money and facilities to do much more extensive research than she could ever imagine!
I know for one that L'Oreal do not test on animals, they use viro testing - which is a synthetic replica of human skin! amazing! They also employ over 4000 scientists for their research.
@sealsex yes everyone's skin responds differently to products but paula reviews skin care based on the formulation, whether there are irritating ingredients, the marketing hype about organic/natural vs synthetic and stuff, i highly recommend reading her book called "the original beauty bible" it talks about everything :)
haha i always go to the la mer counter at the department store and try all of the testers, but seriously there cream is just like the plainest cold cream around, and consequently falls into the why bother category
I totally don't agree with the true match thing. That makeup sucks!! Maybelline super stay or revlon long stay is so much better when it comes to liquid foundation. But dream matte mousse powder is pretty good I have to say.
No they're not. L'Oreal is owned by L'Oreal International. MAC is owned by Estee Lauder. You can go to L'Oreal and Estee Lauder's Corporate sites that list all the brands they both own. It's eye opening, to say the least.
I have her book and I love it! I don't necessarily agree with everything she says, because sometimes she marks things down because they COULD be irritating to the skin - and if it doesn't irritate me I still use it! But very informational and great if you are thinking about trying a new product you never have before!
that's quite true. I spent 7 bucks on a Life brand 5% Benzo proxzide, and it is working BETTER than the 40 bucks Proactiv which contains 2.5% Benzo proxzide.
Paula is indeed a very smart woman, but I can not believe that she is being entirely fair and unbiased about her comments regarding other brands/products. She has here own brand to push - both her and US need to be always aware of this simple fact.
i like watching your video's cause you have a great understanding of products and what they contain, such as ingredients.which is important to know how they work because people can get confused into wat product is best for them + most of all if it's the right for them.
I found some exiting news for making this whole money situation we are all in a bit easier. I have made good money with it. If you would like to check it out sometime stop by my channel and check out my videos. Please also leave a message would like to hear from all.
As a makeup artist, it's all about the quality of the makeup - does it do the job? Pigmentation, blendibility, and texture are important...
The majority of makeup I use on myself and clients are from MAC - but I definitly have a few products from the drugstore that I have in my train case.
So when it comes down to it: if the quality of two products are similar, I will choose the cheaper one. This way, I can recommend it to my clients so that they can go out and buy it if they like it.
i second chantique! CANT STAND DRUGSTORE CRAP and it always makes me react. my skin magically knows the difference. quality guys... MAC is the best brand. theres a reason its the most popular makeup brand! besides its not that expensive, dont be cheap when it comes to your face!!
If it literally has the same ingredients then I think that means that it's just all in your head.
I have heard so many people complain about MAC and Clinique making them break out so I'm not going to be agreeing with your insinuation that because it made you break out it's a subpar product somehow. But you know what.. go ahead and stimulate the economy.
MAC vs. Maybelline -- you won't be able to tell the difference, really?? Because I sure can!
The Maybelline powder caused me to break out and ever since I went to M.A.C, I NEVER had that problem! Yeah, the drugstore brand is $6, and that money you save will just go towards acne face wash for your damaged skin.
When it comes to makeup, I choose quality over cheap stuff. Why risk ruining your skin just so you can save a few bucks?
You have to appreciate though that, Mabelline doesn't make everyone break out, it may have just been a reaction to your skin. As far as economically value Mabelline is still good quality. She looks at the similarity of ingredients..not necessarily personal preference over, texture, pigment, packaging etc.
Just because something is "cheap" doesn't mean it's low in quality. That depends on the company itself and their marketing strategy. Some prefer to sell their products at low costs, and some want the "high quality" appeal.
When you buy something at mac, you're not just buying the makeup. You're paying for the costs that go into packaging, training the workers at mac who help you pick out your makeup, and of course the brand name itself.
I agree!! Well said. i was looking for a lip and cheek stain. Benefit's Benetint is 31 Euros. That is just too expensive and I tried it, but I was not happy with the result. I bought a lip and cheek stain from a British brand, 2 True, and it was 3 Euros and 50 cents and it is great!!!!
Mac also has better shadesand undertones to match many skin colors most stuff sold at wal mart or CVs are made with about the same undertone just in darker shades.
mac's foundation is known for a lot of people breaking out. >>; there are tons of drugstore foundations that can suit a skintone. you just need to look for it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
well there's another difference, the less expensive products really don't have nice packages. take MAC and Maybelline for example, which one would u rather have on your desk?!
I didn't like this lady's book because she hated EVERYTHING except for the products in her line....hmm?? Suspicious much?! I mean she literally found something wrong or to complain about in every line, every product, everything!
I dont know about that.. to me her evaluations are valid and thorough - giving you things to consider before you buy any product. ...What I like is that she considers the actual ingredients. Obviously, Paula isn't the one who is going to be reviewing/critisizing her own line! That is for someone else to do.. her website gives customers a chance to review, comment, and give tips from their own experiences.
I've tried both her gel eyeliner and lip gloss and i think that they are the best!
her "evaluations" in what? her book or her website? i'm only referring to her product reviews in her book..."Dont Go To the Makeup Counter without Me" - believe me, she hated everything. Her website reviews might be much more impartial?
Most of all is great to know what work and what dont. Then if u are like Angelina Jolie, Rihanna or Heidi Klum earn much more money then most of us then image is everything right, guess they will prefer the expensive version. That's the luxury of being rich, cant buy happiness but can almost buy everything else...
do you get barry m in the states? not tested on animals and excellent range of colours ( make up) and very good value, prices starting from 2.95 lip liner.
I want to know more about the difference between CHANEL and L'oreal, are textures the same? which one looks natural, which one not, oh please! do make up thanks
Nothing is different except the price. Drug store brands usually have better morals too by not gouging money out of people and giving them the idea that expensive is always better.
I agree with you, SlayerAngel90 in the sense that some lower end products are very similar to high end products (like, Chanel and L'oreal foundation) but drug store brands do not have better morals. High end companies have drug store brands just to make more money. It's all about money.
If you'd read any of her work you'd know that she not only takes the ingredients into account - she takes into account concentration, pH, combination of ingredients, and where the research/rationale behind each ingredient comes from.
did you know that they are taking rabbits because they don't have a tear-flow-system like we have, so the rubbed in cream can't be washed out by themselves for days?
depends, sometimes animal testing is required and sometimes not. otherwise you should stop using your sunscreen, take medicine and etc. because they have involved animal testing
maybe it's time we should do exactly that before going on and on about how humen come first in the hierarchy of the world and that our lifes are so much more precious than anything around, before and after us? but that's just my opinion.
do i believe we should make animals suffer? of course not, i love animals. BUT i only support animal testing when its necessary for cancer/hiv cures, medicine, vaccines, sunscreen, etc.
i really dont hold an ethical position on animal testing when i buy my cosmetics. so if you want to ignore companies with animal testing thats fine and be aware that a lot of companies have unknown status
thanks, although we have different opinions, that you're taking the time for such a no-end discussion. i know, it's quite a tough task, living without animal-testing. i try to, sometimes i fail, too, but i really want to try and live it.
maybelline is doing animal testing. she didn't took that into consideration when praising it, did she?
we are where we are now by doing exactly this. exploiting tha nature and animal world for more and more and more meat, hormones, tests etc for less and less and less money.
i am a student and my parents are by no means rich , but i'm willing to pay more, if it's not animal tested or produced in a poor country. fact is, being morally right produced sadly often still costs more.
if we didn't do animal testing more than half the world would not exist and many people would die without proper medication. i'm totally against torturing animals and tantalizing animals and using them for money purposes and anything related to harming them WITHOUT REASON i'm against, but i value the life of a human being over an animal any day.
i totally get your point and i actually think that we're coming from the same angle, although i try to value every life as it is on the same level.
it's just that before bringing e.g. a foot cream on the market there is a line of testing you agree/have to do if you decided to do animal testing. rubbing a foot cream into the eyes of rabbits seems quite WITHOUT REASON to me.
thats really sad that you think that the cost of a product would mean it is less likely to test on animals, thats truely amusing and that "cheap" products test on animals. considering that loreal owns more than half of the industry including chanel, mac, etc.
doesn't mac belongs to estee lauder and isn't chanel a private coorporation? i really like discussing this kind of subjects but i prefer people who knows what they are talking about. lots of drugstore products are from l'oreal like maybelline or garnier who are doing animal testing. and the sad part for me is that the very same company owns e.g. the body shop who is against animal testing. i'm sorry, but i don't think that "money rules" is amusing at all.
you are right, mac is not owned by them. loreal owns armani, Shu Uemura, lancome, La Roche-Posay, kiehls, etc.
what i found amusing is the fact that you somehow believe bc a company is more expensive it does not include animal testing, lol. read the consumer reports and the actual animal testing list which can be found at navs. fyi, maybelline does not include animal testing nor does garnier. and estee(mac, bobbi brown) has been blasted for using fur in their campaigns
of course i know that it's not all black-or-white. but i have to stay with my point of view when saying that a lot of animal-friendly products are very expensive. that's my experience when trying to only buy stuff without e.g. animal-testing.
yea, based on experience! < you were boasting about it as if you've done research and please you have not, saying that maybelline tested on animals just bc its cheaper!
If the MAC Mineralize Skinfinish and the Maybelline's version is the same, then I would love to buy the Maybelline one, but what about shades? I find all the drugstore shades to be too pink and many don't cater to women of color, so I have no choice but to buy MAC.
That is something that she points out in her book: one real advantage of the MAC line is their wide variety of shades and the fact that the range extends from very dark to very light.
Does she have a facebook page??? <3
cafeconlechegrl 1 month ago
No qualifications, she is not a scientist or dermatoligist. I would find more credibility in someones opinion who has actually helped develop these products in the industry. Plus she changes her opinion while the big companies are already ahead of her, she was once against anti-oxidants being in skincare!
To be honest i just can stand the woman, she really paints a good vs bad guy image but in the end she is just as bad pluggin her own products and using consumer ignorance to her advantage
SuperJaz11 4 months ago
Is it just me or does this woman appear to have a serious vendetta against big cosmetis companies? So what if L'Oreal and Estee lauder own most of the brands on the market? Good for them! They also have the money and facilities to do much more extensive research than she could ever imagine!
I know for one that L'Oreal do not test on animals, they use viro testing - which is a synthetic replica of human skin! amazing! They also employ over 4000 scientists for their research.
SuperJaz11 4 months ago
17 people works for la mer
happypeace07 8 months ago 2
I'm a student and can't afford high-end products and seriously, I love drugstore products!
sueshishi 1 year ago 2
Personally i think this is a load of crap.
I use both drugstore products and higher end products so i´m not saying drugstore products are bad.
But I think you have to consider how the products preform and feel.
I usually go for higher-end products when it comes to the things that will sit closest to my skin, and for eyeshadows.
With that said, i would never ever waste my money on mascara, eye/lip-pencils, lipsticks etc. from any high-end brand.
Above all, it's about the texture of the product.
sealsex 1 year ago
@sealsex yes everyone's skin responds differently to products but paula reviews skin care based on the formulation, whether there are irritating ingredients, the marketing hype about organic/natural vs synthetic and stuff, i highly recommend reading her book called "the original beauty bible" it talks about everything :)
LaurenAlexandra711 11 months ago
I have been wanting this book for the longest time...
softlyserenademe 1 year ago
haha i always go to the la mer counter at the department store and try all of the testers, but seriously there cream is just like the plainest cold cream around, and consequently falls into the why bother category
enzyme20056 1 year ago
I want Paula to have her own You-tube channel.
veggiieee 1 year ago 11
@veggiieee She has.. :)
mimzy84 11 months ago
Wonderful , wonderful info !!!
Thanks !!
YTfancol 1 year ago
I hate to agree based on my experience that La Mer was not better than products 1/3 of its price. It is a total waste of money.
frasianM 1 year ago 4
Kim is great at interviewing!
LizRocksMySox 1 year ago
haha, Paula is my hero!
thecommentmonster 2 years ago
I totally don't agree with the true match thing. That makeup sucks!! Maybelline super stay or revlon long stay is so much better when it comes to liquid foundation. But dream matte mousse powder is pretty good I have to say.
softlyserenademe 2 years ago
L'Oreal and MAC are owned by the same company.
dc2610 2 years ago
No they're not. L'Oreal is owned by L'Oreal International. MAC is owned by Estee Lauder. You can go to L'Oreal and Estee Lauder's Corporate sites that list all the brands they both own. It's eye opening, to say the least.
roberry82 1 year ago 5
@dc2610 Where did you get that information from? LOL L'Oreal is owned by L'Oreal, MAC is owned by Estee Lauder
SuperJaz11 4 months ago
thank youu paula!!
everlastinggrnworld 2 years ago 2
this is such useful information.
who would've thought LOREAL would beat MAC? lol
Cuttiegirlsu 2 years ago 4
Great information!
MsBeLLaVaNa 2 years ago
this woman is amazing. . .
inspirexxme 2 years ago 10
awesome. just awesome.
voxtrotlous 2 years ago
I have her book and I love it! I don't necessarily agree with everything she says, because sometimes she marks things down because they COULD be irritating to the skin - and if it doesn't irritate me I still use it! But very informational and great if you are thinking about trying a new product you never have before!
emma387846 2 years ago 2
she is sooooooo intense...
audreywince 2 years ago 2
This interview/conversation is sooo stressed-sounding.
CleverDjembe 2 years ago
But I like to buy the illusion that comes with a high price article :-) (at least sometimes)
Mondoshawn 2 years ago
that's quite true. I spent 7 bucks on a Life brand 5% Benzo proxzide, and it is working BETTER than the 40 bucks Proactiv which contains 2.5% Benzo proxzide.
enochxu 2 years ago 4
Paula is indeed a very smart woman, but I can not believe that she is being entirely fair and unbiased about her comments regarding other brands/products. She has here own brand to push - both her and US need to be always aware of this simple fact.
BrandonBoston2 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
BOARING NO INFO
ashleyg7272 2 years ago
she reminds me of Stacy London
from what not to wear
she looks alot like her
LatinCutie86 2 years ago 4
i like watching your video's cause you have a great understanding of products and what they contain, such as ingredients.which is important to know how they work because people can get confused into wat product is best for them + most of all if it's the right for them.
glitzxgalmx 2 years ago
not much info in the video
haa74 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice video and good info.
I found some exiting news for making this whole money situation we are all in a bit easier. I have made good money with it. If you would like to check it out sometime stop by my channel and check out my videos. Please also leave a message would like to hear from all.
Have a great day.
mowryric 2 years ago
As a makeup artist, it's all about the quality of the makeup - does it do the job? Pigmentation, blendibility, and texture are important...
The majority of makeup I use on myself and clients are from MAC - but I definitly have a few products from the drugstore that I have in my train case.
So when it comes down to it: if the quality of two products are similar, I will choose the cheaper one. This way, I can recommend it to my clients so that they can go out and buy it if they like it.
MaryAnnAB1989 2 years ago 4
thank you sooo much for this video great!! FYI
TINAPUBLIO333 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i second chantique! CANT STAND DRUGSTORE CRAP and it always makes me react. my skin magically knows the difference. quality guys... MAC is the best brand. theres a reason its the most popular makeup brand! besides its not that expensive, dont be cheap when it comes to your face!!
sage6o4 2 years ago
If it literally has the same ingredients then I think that means that it's just all in your head.
I have heard so many people complain about MAC and Clinique making them break out so I'm not going to be agreeing with your insinuation that because it made you break out it's a subpar product somehow. But you know what.. go ahead and stimulate the economy.
dirtychucks 2 years ago 27
This has been flagged as spam show
MAC vs. Maybelline -- you won't be able to tell the difference, really?? Because I sure can!
The Maybelline powder caused me to break out and ever since I went to M.A.C, I NEVER had that problem! Yeah, the drugstore brand is $6, and that money you save will just go towards acne face wash for your damaged skin.
When it comes to makeup, I choose quality over cheap stuff. Why risk ruining your skin just so you can save a few bucks?
Chantique1986 2 years ago
You have to appreciate though that, Mabelline doesn't make everyone break out, it may have just been a reaction to your skin. As far as economically value Mabelline is still good quality. She looks at the similarity of ingredients..not necessarily personal preference over, texture, pigment, packaging etc.
Camden1313 2 years ago 12
Just because something is "cheap" doesn't mean it's low in quality. That depends on the company itself and their marketing strategy. Some prefer to sell their products at low costs, and some want the "high quality" appeal.
When you buy something at mac, you're not just buying the makeup. You're paying for the costs that go into packaging, training the workers at mac who help you pick out your makeup, and of course the brand name itself.
Don't just assume that cheaper = bad quality.
RoseLeeMusic88 2 years ago 55
I agree!! Well said. i was looking for a lip and cheek stain. Benefit's Benetint is 31 Euros. That is just too expensive and I tried it, but I was not happy with the result. I bought a lip and cheek stain from a British brand, 2 True, and it was 3 Euros and 50 cents and it is great!!!!
sharcherry 2 years ago 2
I have this book
only thing is that they need to update the book like every 6 months or something
they dont have NEW products in their book
ilovekpop906 2 years ago
Mac also has better shadesand undertones to match many skin colors most stuff sold at wal mart or CVs are made with about the same undertone just in darker shades.
soni408 2 years ago
mac's foundation is known for a lot of people breaking out. >>; there are tons of drugstore foundations that can suit a skintone. you just need to look for it.
lovevsabsence 2 years ago 8
for about $15 less id rather have maybelline thank you :)
handicaplaw 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well there's another difference, the less expensive products really don't have nice packages. take MAC and Maybelline for example, which one would u rather have on your desk?!
wengirl1102 2 years ago
mac(:
missmakeupx3 2 years ago
ok so u just have EVERYTHING sitting out on ur desk showing??? everything??? i dont think so hun :)
AngelGurl07734 2 years ago 2
you sound like a little girl - "BUT MOMMY!, this one has sparkles and butterflies on the cover oooooooo!"
meahcarnation 2 years ago 5
the ceraveve cleaser is AWESOME!
junerosie321 2 years ago
Comment removed
123lluuppee 2 years ago
I didn't like this lady's book because she hated EVERYTHING except for the products in her line....hmm?? Suspicious much?! I mean she literally found something wrong or to complain about in every line, every product, everything!
cybersylv 3 years ago 7
I dont know about that.. to me her evaluations are valid and thorough - giving you things to consider before you buy any product. ...What I like is that she considers the actual ingredients. Obviously, Paula isn't the one who is going to be reviewing/critisizing her own line! That is for someone else to do.. her website gives customers a chance to review, comment, and give tips from their own experiences.
I've tried both her gel eyeliner and lip gloss and i think that they are the best!
starburst43x 2 years ago 6
her "evaluations" in what? her book or her website? i'm only referring to her product reviews in her book..."Dont Go To the Makeup Counter without Me" - believe me, she hated everything. Her website reviews might be much more impartial?
cybersylv 2 years ago
thanks for this... absolutely awesome!
cendelin 3 years ago 3
Comment vendre de mauvais cosmetiques américains et boycoter la qualité européenne ? Buy her book !
AZELTRON 3 years ago
she has such a beautiful body.
peaceandloveletsblow 3 years ago 3
hey whatever, i suppose some people enjoy spending that much on cleanser...you only live once ;)
tipmeoveranpourmeout 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah i agree. if you have that money and would love to spend on expensive stuff and it makes u feel good, why not? lol...
wengirl1102 2 years ago
love love love this book!!!!!
PennyQuest 3 years ago
She didn't talk about the Aveeno face cleanser! That's the one I use! lol
siyang2 3 years ago 5
ahhh i use that one too haha
hazelhoochie13 3 years ago
Most of all is great to know what work and what dont. Then if u are like Angelina Jolie, Rihanna or Heidi Klum earn much more money then most of us then image is everything right, guess they will prefer the expensive version. That's the luxury of being rich, cant buy happiness but can almost buy everything else...
SLILLY76 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Death to Americans!
israel 3 years ago
do you get barry m in the states? not tested on animals and excellent range of colours ( make up) and very good value, prices starting from 2.95 lip liner.
mistysamantha 3 years ago
ouch on the mac review lol... but very nice to know lol
msfililocalola 3 years ago
Comment removed
missmarnip 3 years ago
Comment removed
missmarnip 3 years ago
I want to know more about the difference between CHANEL and L'oreal, are textures the same? which one looks natural, which one not, oh please! do make up thanks
piwitron 3 years ago
Nothing is different except the price. Drug store brands usually have better morals too by not gouging money out of people and giving them the idea that expensive is always better.
SlayerAngel90 3 years ago
I agree with you, SlayerAngel90 in the sense that some lower end products are very similar to high end products (like, Chanel and L'oreal foundation) but drug store brands do not have better morals. High end companies have drug store brands just to make more money. It's all about money.
PeachTea0 3 years ago 4
Wow, how the hell did we get into an animal testing argument?
SlayerAngel90 3 years ago 5
um .. wtf .. in canada the maybelline miner powders like 20 $
prettygurl166 3 years ago
this is in us dollars
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
Comment removed
MaryAnnAB1989 2 years ago
She took the ingredients of the products into account; however, did she take the CONCENRTRAION OF THE PRODUCT into consideration?
10% benzyl peroxide does a lot more damage than 2%, for instance.
hahaseashells 3 years ago
benzoyl peroxide actually isn't good for the skin. it makes you more prone to sun damage
M1SSCEE 3 years ago
then explain to me why a dermatologist would give it to their patients?
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
If you'd read any of her work you'd know that she not only takes the ingredients into account - she takes into account concentration, pH, combination of ingredients, and where the research/rationale behind each ingredient comes from.
zaitesushion 3 years ago 2
she already said in her book that it irritates more
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
yuk, looks old to me, that "expert". lot of (bad) work done, he?
sulivanxs 3 years ago 4
She uses Botox. She is in her middle fifties, so your "old" and "yuk" comments are obnoxious and pointless.
TeaMonkee 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
she looks amazing for 50!
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
did you know that they are taking rabbits because they don't have a tear-flow-system like we have, so the rubbed in cream can't be washed out by themselves for days?
but what do i know, i'm not a scientist yet.
missmarnip 3 years ago 2
That is sick and tragic-using animals!! I will only buy things that are NOT tested on tortured animals!
wjv4me 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
depends, sometimes animal testing is required and sometimes not. otherwise you should stop using your sunscreen, take medicine and etc. because they have involved animal testing
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
maybe it's time we should do exactly that before going on and on about how humen come first in the hierarchy of the world and that our lifes are so much more precious than anything around, before and after us? but that's just my opinion.
missmarnip 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
do i believe we should make animals suffer? of course not, i love animals. BUT i only support animal testing when its necessary for cancer/hiv cures, medicine, vaccines, sunscreen, etc.
i really dont hold an ethical position on animal testing when i buy my cosmetics. so if you want to ignore companies with animal testing thats fine and be aware that a lot of companies have unknown status
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
thanks, although we have different opinions, that you're taking the time for such a no-end discussion. i know, it's quite a tough task, living without animal-testing. i try to, sometimes i fail, too, but i really want to try and live it.
missmarnip 3 years ago
Well, I used to think like you, but now I see that animal testing is horrible. Just ask my cat. (She hates lipstick!)
MissPoirotFan 2 years ago 5
maybelline is doing animal testing. she didn't took that into consideration when praising it, did she?
we are where we are now by doing exactly this. exploiting tha nature and animal world for more and more and more meat, hormones, tests etc for less and less and less money.
i am a student and my parents are by no means rich , but i'm willing to pay more, if it's not animal tested or produced in a poor country. fact is, being morally right produced sadly often still costs more.
missmarnip 3 years ago
if we didn't do animal testing more than half the world would not exist and many people would die without proper medication. i'm totally against torturing animals and tantalizing animals and using them for money purposes and anything related to harming them WITHOUT REASON i'm against, but i value the life of a human being over an animal any day.
1puredreamer 3 years ago 2
i totally get your point and i actually think that we're coming from the same angle, although i try to value every life as it is on the same level.
it's just that before bringing e.g. a foot cream on the market there is a line of testing you agree/have to do if you decided to do animal testing. rubbing a foot cream into the eyes of rabbits seems quite WITHOUT REASON to me.
missmarnip 3 years ago
you should read her book, she goes into that in her book.
sometimes animal testing is needed> medicine> every sunscreen
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
thats really sad that you think that the cost of a product would mean it is less likely to test on animals, thats truely amusing and that "cheap" products test on animals. considering that loreal owns more than half of the industry including chanel, mac, etc.
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
doesn't mac belongs to estee lauder and isn't chanel a private coorporation? i really like discussing this kind of subjects but i prefer people who knows what they are talking about. lots of drugstore products are from l'oreal like maybelline or garnier who are doing animal testing. and the sad part for me is that the very same company owns e.g. the body shop who is against animal testing. i'm sorry, but i don't think that "money rules" is amusing at all.
missmarnip 3 years ago
you are right, mac is not owned by them. loreal owns armani, Shu Uemura, lancome, La Roche-Posay, kiehls, etc.
what i found amusing is the fact that you somehow believe bc a company is more expensive it does not include animal testing, lol. read the consumer reports and the actual animal testing list which can be found at navs. fyi, maybelline does not include animal testing nor does garnier. and estee(mac, bobbi brown) has been blasted for using fur in their campaigns
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
of course i know that it's not all black-or-white. but i have to stay with my point of view when saying that a lot of animal-friendly products are very expensive. that's my experience when trying to only buy stuff without e.g. animal-testing.
missmarnip 3 years ago
yea, based on experience! < you were boasting about it as if you've done research and please you have not, saying that maybelline tested on animals just bc its cheaper!
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
Comment removed
MaryAnnAB1989 2 years ago
come on, wake up
coperniciaTalent 3 years ago
yeah, wake up.
missmarnip 3 years ago
be human friendly instead!!
coperniciaTalent 3 years ago
like in my previous comments, i try to be both animal and human friendly. there is nothing wrong with trying imo.
missmarnip 3 years ago
i have to get her book=0
miaangel247 3 years ago
Paula is the very best. I adore her so much for her work. I'm going to see her next week. So excited...
chrisbell1979 3 years ago
she has BEAUTIFUL skin and hair. And the skin on her hands, which can really show your age, looks amazing. She looks great for her age!!!!
sugahlips47 3 years ago
She gets some special cosmetic treatment by a plastic surgeon in Montreal. She didn't look this good a few years ago.
tealeh2 3 years ago 8
not on her hands, she gets botox on face, but botox cant give you amazing skin
elevensmiles11 3 years ago
If the MAC Mineralize Skinfinish and the Maybelline's version is the same, then I would love to buy the Maybelline one, but what about shades? I find all the drugstore shades to be too pink and many don't cater to women of color, so I have no choice but to buy MAC.
disconlemonade 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i personally think the maybelline shades are great...i personally only use maybelline skin products
blahishness88 3 years ago
That is something that she points out in her book: one real advantage of the MAC line is their wide variety of shades and the fact that the range extends from very dark to very light.
productjunkie 3 years ago
Love Paula's book.
Yellokitti63 3 years ago
i loooove cerave, i have the moisturizer
queenofthescots14 3 years ago
thank you! :)
arterinium 3 years ago