Earmarks are 1/10 of 1% of the national budget. A Representative's job is to get money for his district. Now that all of these fearful dumb asses are swearing off earmarks, they are phoning earmarks in i.e. calling someone & saying if you don't get me 1 million for our states schools, I won't suppport you. Earmarks are nothing compared to our wasted war mongering expense. Beck is a dumb ass as usual. Yes, Glenn, we are that stupid but not as dumb as you. Go cry...
Earmarks are misunderstood. If your representative does not put earmarks into a bill, the money will still be spent by someone else. So if you do not like earmarks, that is fine, but continue to pay taxes and get none of the money back in your state. Earmarks make up like 1% of the budget. That is hardly the problem in this country. You pay taxes...get as much of it back to your state as you can. You don't like the spending? Bring the troops home and close the bases all over the world.
@buckmastr123 That's exactly the point. Remove earmarks and use that money to pay off debt, OR, lower the taxes because you do not need that money anymore. Give back the money taken from Americans.
@Alidor76 I don't like earmarks either, at all! HOWEVER, what most people don't understand is that if you don't put them in, it is not going to save ANY money! In the current system, if your Rep doesn't put earmarks in, that money just goes to someone else to be spent (Exec Branch). Pay off debt? I really wish they would but it's more like fund another bomb to send to overseas. Change policy and you can get rid of them for the better. Not supporting them in the current system is idiotic.
@buckmastr123 I have done quite a bit of research as to the earmarks function and have come to realize that you're correct in your post. It is indeed a systemic problem. I even venture to say that in some cases are valid, but like anything, it's subject to abuse and frequently is.
My new question is "Is there a difference between earmark and pork barrel projects?"
@Alidor76 This is my understanding: There are certain bills that can be called earmarked expenditures for a number of reasons. However, for these earmarked bills to pass the House there has to be some sort of incentive for Reps to vote for it. "Pork" gets added to the bill to buy votes for the big project. The problem is that sometimes so much pork gets added to ensure it passes that the pork that was inserted to buy votes cost more than the original project. That's my understanding.
waste and abuse of the tax payer. STFU you liar's! Bull shit! I can't take it ! My ears! My head. Trust this government? Never! Bunch of crooks! Yes Glenn a lot of americans are very stupid! That is why we dont really educate people on their rights. Wast your time learning the useless crap they teach you in school. I dont know what...They brain wash people to believe the lies. They think we are their slaves. Most of you are. Not much more than animals.
Who put's these unethical crooks in jail? Seems like it's a free for all. Nothing get's done and the people get taxed and screwed. No wonder government is big business. But But I thought they where of the people and for the people? So arent we doing it to ourselves? They guy is right when the people don't care about spending in Washington. Because we dont see a connection. Most people dont have time to care becuase the bills need to be payed. Its hard being a slave to the White mans system
I'm normally not a fan of FOX News or especially of Glenn Beck but I do think he's got it right this time. 9000+ earmarks are outrageous. Hopefully this is a one off thing and our president can get his act together otherwise i'd be very sad that Hilary Clinton didn't win...
@ 08carnage08 -- Whether you like Glenn Beck and/or FOX, the truth is, they are the closest to fair and balanced that we can get right now. And the vast majority of the time, they present the truth. THAT is why the Obamanistration is trying to discredit them so hard.
As a Self Proclaimed Progressive, Obama is doing exactly what he and the Progressive Jerks want done, regardless of what americans want, or whether it is good for the country.
And these are the people that are supposed to be holding big business accountable for it's wild spending. These are the people that are playing Robin Hood with taxpayer money. This administration is going to spend the next 4 years having a field day in a playground of our money, and the savior Obama isn't going to do a thing about it, and wouldn't know where to start even if he wanted to. He's not a President, he's a movie star.
The little rodent pissant glen beck is leaving out facts. The earmarks that he is blaming the dems for was approved by republicans way before the 08 election. The dems did not insert any pork in the budget.
And you're not leaving out facts, eh? Spoken like a true liberal hypocrite. You know *nothing* about Glenn Beck and what he stands for and you've proven that quite well here. Thanks for showering us with your ignorance.
I apologize. I thought it was just a Kennedy building. Now I see it is a nationwide building swindle to reward local contractor contributors *bribers*. Stop the taxpayer funding of those building and lower the natioal debt and our taxes.
Look at the number of views in this video. 1000. Obama's video get millions of views (e.g. Obama girl - 13 M views). The age of common sense has given way to hype and popularity. RIP GOP
the money for these earmarks/special projects has already been stolen from us in taxes. at least the earmark accounts for what the money is being spent on. getting rid of earmarks wont solve overspending in congress. we need to abolish the tax code...
Fox News' Glenn Beck strikes ratings gold by challenging Barack Obama
By Matea Gold
March 6, 2009
-From the Los Angeles Times
"We still have 90 seconds -- why don't you tell me about last night's ratings?" he said to his producer in the control room upstairs. The word came back through his earpiece: 2.2 million viewers, more than CNN, MSNBC and HLN combined at that hour. A grin spread across Beck's face.
"Wow, we're closing in on O'Reilly!" he exclaimed jovially. "I'm coming for him!"
Yeah, o'reilly and beck should be really proud for capturing the retarded and senile ultra-conservative bible hugging, confederate flag waving, racist old people demographic !!! You'll find tonnes of those people, i don't know, IN TEXAS AND ALABAMA !!!!
nakeder .... there is a difference between President Obama SAYING he is not allowing earmarks and him actually not allowing earmarks. He can say it all day long, but an $8 billion magnetic train from Los Angeles to Las Vegas is a freakin' earmark! Why should people in Colorado, Texas, and Florida have to pay for an EXPERIMENTAL train that isn't even designed, much less a legitimate possibility.
Can you read nakeder? The stimulus bill is all earmarks/port. You believe what he says? Do your homework, if Obama's mouth is open, he's lying. Read the Chicago papers/back issues.
You do realise that all the earmarks have been inherited from the bush administration and if Obama didn't sign the bill, the government would partially shut down, because most of the funding from the bill goes to domestic agencies. The bill would therefore have to be re-written, and that whole rigmarole would take at least another 4 months.
So instead of spending 4 months cleaning up the QUAGMIRE & starting down the path of *responsible* spending, we should just pass it all now and forget it because, it would take TIME to fix it. And if anybody says anything about it, we'll point fingers at Bush and blame him.This is sounding familiar.I don't think *all* the earmarks were inherited from the Bush admin.I must have heard and read it wrong, so I'll just look the other way and point fingers at someone else. Glad we saved that 4 months.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Big ignorant Glen Beck. He does not no the difference between the stimulus bill that has NO EARMARKS and the left-over bill from Bush's time that has the 9,000 earmarks. That bill with 9,000 'earmarks' is an unfinnished business from last year.
nakeder:Perhaps you missed the video and the point. Obama and gang were busted, their 2008 earmarks were revealed on the new bill, then Obama's name was removed as the creator of the earmark. An earmark is an earmark, change the word if you will, or should we say: if you must.
@uncleburley --Earmarks are complicated, but as I understand it money is set aside to spend. States vie for that money. If money isn't spent, then Obama gets to spend it any way he wishes. Dr. Paul is just trying to prevent him from getting a "blank check. I agree with Dr. Paul on that! Congress should spend money, not the President.
@kirstenannfondren --Earmarks are complicated, but as I understand it money is set aside to spend. States vie for that money. If money isn't spent, then Obama gets to spend it any way he wishes. Dr. Paul is just trying to prevent him from getting a "blank check. I agree with Dr. Paul on that! Congress should spend money, not the President.
@InvestigatorDave --Earmarks are complicated, but as I understand it money is set aside to spend. States vie for that money. If money isn't spent, then Obama gets to spend it any way he wishes. Dr. Paul is just trying to prevent him from getting a "blank check. I agree with Dr. Paul on that! Congress should spend money, not the President.
Earmarks are 1/10 of 1% of the national budget. A Representative's job is to get money for his district. Now that all of these fearful dumb asses are swearing off earmarks, they are phoning earmarks in i.e. calling someone & saying if you don't get me 1 million for our states schools, I won't suppport you. Earmarks are nothing compared to our wasted war mongering expense. Beck is a dumb ass as usual. Yes, Glenn, we are that stupid but not as dumb as you. Go cry...
rleary1 1 year ago
This man is an idiot
Democrate4Life 1 year ago
Earmarks are misunderstood. If your representative does not put earmarks into a bill, the money will still be spent by someone else. So if you do not like earmarks, that is fine, but continue to pay taxes and get none of the money back in your state. Earmarks make up like 1% of the budget. That is hardly the problem in this country. You pay taxes...get as much of it back to your state as you can. You don't like the spending? Bring the troops home and close the bases all over the world.
buckmastr123 1 year ago
@buckmastr123 That's exactly the point. Remove earmarks and use that money to pay off debt, OR, lower the taxes because you do not need that money anymore. Give back the money taken from Americans.
Alidor76 1 year ago
Comment removed
buckmastr123 1 year ago
@Alidor76 I don't like earmarks either, at all! HOWEVER, what most people don't understand is that if you don't put them in, it is not going to save ANY money! In the current system, if your Rep doesn't put earmarks in, that money just goes to someone else to be spent (Exec Branch). Pay off debt? I really wish they would but it's more like fund another bomb to send to overseas. Change policy and you can get rid of them for the better. Not supporting them in the current system is idiotic.
buckmastr123 1 year ago
@buckmastr123 I have done quite a bit of research as to the earmarks function and have come to realize that you're correct in your post. It is indeed a systemic problem. I even venture to say that in some cases are valid, but like anything, it's subject to abuse and frequently is.
My new question is "Is there a difference between earmark and pork barrel projects?"
Alidor76 1 year ago
@Alidor76 This is my understanding: There are certain bills that can be called earmarked expenditures for a number of reasons. However, for these earmarked bills to pass the House there has to be some sort of incentive for Reps to vote for it. "Pork" gets added to the bill to buy votes for the big project. The problem is that sometimes so much pork gets added to ensure it passes that the pork that was inserted to buy votes cost more than the original project. That's my understanding.
buckmastr123 1 year ago
waste and abuse of the tax payer. STFU you liar's! Bull shit! I can't take it ! My ears! My head. Trust this government? Never! Bunch of crooks! Yes Glenn a lot of americans are very stupid! That is why we dont really educate people on their rights. Wast your time learning the useless crap they teach you in school. I dont know what...They brain wash people to believe the lies. They think we are their slaves. Most of you are. Not much more than animals.
silverpizza100 1 year ago
Who put's these unethical crooks in jail? Seems like it's a free for all. Nothing get's done and the people get taxed and screwed. No wonder government is big business. But But I thought they where of the people and for the people? So arent we doing it to ourselves? They guy is right when the people don't care about spending in Washington. Because we dont see a connection. Most people dont have time to care becuase the bills need to be payed. Its hard being a slave to the White mans system
silverpizza100 1 year ago
I still find it sad that no one is laughing at "Over 9,000". Come on, it's an internet meme!
alt2jones 1 year ago
"There are over 9,000 earmarks"
WHAT? NINE THOUSAND!? That's impossible, there's now way that could be right!
alt2jones 1 year ago
lot earmarks r wrong but so is glen beck
mjdietle 1 year ago
gagz won myspace?????????????
ericarocks2 1 year ago
who the fuck is GAGZ WON ?????
ericarocks2 1 year ago
Liberal backed mainstream media will never tell you any of this. They're in with them.
Glenn Beck is the man. He show the real truth about our politician. Keep up the great work.
EVOKIN 1 year ago
He's a faggot
MiamiIndianTribe 1 year ago
I'm normally not a fan of FOX News or especially of Glenn Beck but I do think he's got it right this time. 9000+ earmarks are outrageous. Hopefully this is a one off thing and our president can get his act together otherwise i'd be very sad that Hilary Clinton didn't win...
08carnage08 2 years ago
@ 08carnage08 -- Whether you like Glenn Beck and/or FOX, the truth is, they are the closest to fair and balanced that we can get right now. And the vast majority of the time, they present the truth. THAT is why the Obamanistration is trying to discredit them so hard.
As a Self Proclaimed Progressive, Obama is doing exactly what he and the Progressive Jerks want done, regardless of what americans want, or whether it is good for the country.
SuperUsaPatriot 1 year ago
why arent journalists reporting the news instead of idiots
chrismead87 2 years ago
Glenn is a bad ass!!!
comotose762 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Glenn Beck is a FAT STOOOPID LYING SACK of TEA-BAGGING DOG-SUCKING SWINE-FLU-SPREADING CHILD-MOLESTING BIGOTRY-LOVING Racist Nazi Pig.
RigatoRoboto 2 years ago
Prove it?
comotose762 2 years ago
Hang in there Glenn...MILLIONS TRULY LOVE YOU and UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU STAND FOR...DOING THE RIGHT(CORRECT) THING!
GaryFoxyFox 2 years ago
And these are the people that are supposed to be holding big business accountable for it's wild spending. These are the people that are playing Robin Hood with taxpayer money. This administration is going to spend the next 4 years having a field day in a playground of our money, and the savior Obama isn't going to do a thing about it, and wouldn't know where to start even if he wanted to. He's not a President, he's a movie star.
ISayNukem 2 years ago 2
The little rodent pissant glen beck is leaving out facts. The earmarks that he is blaming the dems for was approved by republicans way before the 08 election. The dems did not insert any pork in the budget.
kostyshankles 2 years ago
And you're not leaving out facts, eh? Spoken like a true liberal hypocrite. You know *nothing* about Glenn Beck and what he stands for and you've proven that quite well here. Thanks for showering us with your ignorance.
AccountabilityNow 2 years ago
@kostyshankles what fag? Is he wrong or you just stupid?
silverpizza100 1 year ago
I apologize. I thought it was just a Kennedy building. Now I see it is a nationwide building swindle to reward local contractor contributors *bribers*. Stop the taxpayer funding of those building and lower the natioal debt and our taxes.
salsalot 2 years ago
Look at the number of views in this video. 1000. Obama's video get millions of views (e.g. Obama girl - 13 M views). The age of common sense has given way to hype and popularity. RIP GOP
cicero747 2 years ago
I know...it's it makes me SICK. We truly need to pray for Glenn AND our Country AND our leaders
GaryFoxyFox 2 years ago
We need to pray for our troops, this holiday.
channel270 2 years ago
the money for these earmarks/special projects has already been stolen from us in taxes. at least the earmark accounts for what the money is being spent on. getting rid of earmarks wont solve overspending in congress. we need to abolish the tax code...
utmost11 2 years ago
i think we need hulk hogans opinion brother
seekanddestroy09 2 years ago
Fox News' Glenn Beck strikes ratings gold by challenging Barack Obama
By Matea Gold
March 6, 2009
-From the Los Angeles Times
"We still have 90 seconds -- why don't you tell me about last night's ratings?" he said to his producer in the control room upstairs. The word came back through his earpiece: 2.2 million viewers, more than CNN, MSNBC and HLN combined at that hour. A grin spread across Beck's face.
"Wow, we're closing in on O'Reilly!" he exclaimed jovially. "I'm coming for him!"
JamesLambert25 2 years ago
Yeah, o'reilly and beck should be really proud for capturing the retarded and senile ultra-conservative bible hugging, confederate flag waving, racist old people demographic !!! You'll find tonnes of those people, i don't know, IN TEXAS AND ALABAMA !!!!
akamola 2 years ago 2
I think of the old story of the frog and the scorpion; Why did you sting me? Now well both die"? "Because Im a scorpion and thats what I do.
These are politicians and this is what they do.
DABIGRAGU1 2 years ago
nakeder .... there is a difference between President Obama SAYING he is not allowing earmarks and him actually not allowing earmarks. He can say it all day long, but an $8 billion magnetic train from Los Angeles to Las Vegas is a freakin' earmark! Why should people in Colorado, Texas, and Florida have to pay for an EXPERIMENTAL train that isn't even designed, much less a legitimate possibility.
avkpierce 2 years ago 2
Can you read nakeder? The stimulus bill is all earmarks/port. You believe what he says? Do your homework, if Obama's mouth is open, he's lying. Read the Chicago papers/back issues.
njpat65 2 years ago 2
You do realise that all the earmarks have been inherited from the bush administration and if Obama didn't sign the bill, the government would partially shut down, because most of the funding from the bill goes to domestic agencies. The bill would therefore have to be re-written, and that whole rigmarole would take at least another 4 months.
akamola 2 years ago
So instead of spending 4 months cleaning up the QUAGMIRE & starting down the path of *responsible* spending, we should just pass it all now and forget it because, it would take TIME to fix it. And if anybody says anything about it, we'll point fingers at Bush and blame him.This is sounding familiar.I don't think *all* the earmarks were inherited from the Bush admin.I must have heard and read it wrong, so I'll just look the other way and point fingers at someone else. Glad we saved that 4 months.
ISayNukem 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Big ignorant Glen Beck. He does not no the difference between the stimulus bill that has NO EARMARKS and the left-over bill from Bush's time that has the 9,000 earmarks. That bill with 9,000 'earmarks' is an unfinnished business from last year.
Obama is not allowing earmarks on his watch.
nakeder 2 years ago
nakeder:Perhaps you missed the video and the point. Obama and gang were busted, their 2008 earmarks were revealed on the new bill, then Obama's name was removed as the creator of the earmark. An earmark is an earmark, change the word if you will, or should we say: if you must.
BUSTED
DABIGRAGU1 2 years ago 2
nakeder, you are beyond ignorant. Another mindless Obama sheep.
oldmanpoo 2 years ago 3
nakeder
you suck at life.
BullshitArt101 2 years ago 2
Can you read nakeder? Obviously you didn't read the stimulus bill. IT IS ALL PORK and earmarks.
njpat65 2 years ago 3
What's happening in our government right now is utterly reprehensable. Thank you Glenn for exposing the truth.
uncleburley 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@uncleburley --Earmarks are complicated, but as I understand it money is set aside to spend. States vie for that money. If money isn't spent, then Obama gets to spend it any way he wishes. Dr. Paul is just trying to prevent him from getting a "blank check. I agree with Dr. Paul on that! Congress should spend money, not the President.
vechorik 1 month ago
Indeed!
kirstenannfondren 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@kirstenannfondren --Earmarks are complicated, but as I understand it money is set aside to spend. States vie for that money. If money isn't spent, then Obama gets to spend it any way he wishes. Dr. Paul is just trying to prevent him from getting a "blank check. I agree with Dr. Paul on that! Congress should spend money, not the President.
vechorik 1 month ago
Name them all, Glenn. Name them all, so we know who to blame, and who NOT to vote for in the next election.
InvestigatorDave 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@InvestigatorDave --Earmarks are complicated, but as I understand it money is set aside to spend. States vie for that money. If money isn't spent, then Obama gets to spend it any way he wishes. Dr. Paul is just trying to prevent him from getting a "blank check. I agree with Dr. Paul on that! Congress should spend money, not the President.
vechorik 1 month ago