I have always heard that to qualify a pattern, you take the number of objects and multiplies it by the number of (in this case) hands. So 6 (rings) * 4 (hands) = 24 (catches).
@IRNjuggle28 It wouldn't have been much trouble for him to win, our right but he only went there to visit for couple or a few days. He wouldnt have been able to compete in all the competitions he wanted to.
In this case, 12 ring syncronized passing (ultimates). This pattern is similar in fashion (when you look at it) to 6 ball wimpy. Steve and Richard successfully demonstrate an Over and Back phenomenon. This looks like a 6 ball wimpy qualify. Additionally, they are doing the same amount of work (individually) as you would if you were just trying to qualify 6 rings sycnronized by yourself (12 throws, 12 catches each). Therefore, I think without question should indeed be considered a qualify.
In a cascade pattern, such as with three balls, a qualify would occur when the last ball of the three to be thrown reaches one hand and then the other, what I could call an "over and back" phenomenon. In other words, over and back signifies a qualify when it is attached to the last ball to thrown from the start of the cascade pattern. Let's extend this notion to passing. NEXT COMMENT
I think 24 is right because you could look at each pair of hands passing to each other as if they were one person's hands qualifying (6x,6x).
I actually can't think of any reason why it should be 48, number of hands shouldn't matter - although thinking about 12 in different numbers of hands trying to prove myself wrong is frazzling my brain a little bit.
AWESOME steve and richard! when I saw the title and thumbnail I actually thought it was going to be someone like Gatto qualifying 12 rings with only 2 hands(disappointed....=) but this is still awesome!
AWESOME steve and richard! when I saw the title and thumbnail I actually thought it was going to be someone like Gatto qualifying 12 rings with only 2 hands(disappointed....=) but this is still awesome!
But even more is the fact that you did it in the ring where exhibitions are executed lol
Let's see. In Passing only the passes count as catches, but as you did ultimates there's no selves and then every throw is a catch (since the run is clean)
I hear that a qualify is (props)x(hands) which would make 48 the correct answer. But that means that every hand in the pattern would have thrown each prop at least once. But evens don't cross, so I think 24 is the right answer then.
LMAO @slowmo
Rode407 1 year ago
I thought it was one person doingwhen i saw the title... I don't like singles
lark0027 1 year ago
nice.
jugglingfreakozoid 1 year ago
I have always heard that to qualify a pattern, you take the number of objects and multiplies it by the number of (in this case) hands. So 6 (rings) * 4 (hands) = 24 (catches).
Nice anyway. :)
SolanderJuggler 1 year ago
Correction: 12 (rings) * 4 (hands) = 48 (catches)
SolanderJuggler 1 year ago 2
you are gonna be worlds best jugglers after a while
747Hero 1 year ago
Weren't Vova galchenko and Toby walker at WJF6?
gebboo 1 year ago
@gebboo Only Vova and he didn't compete because of college. He came to visit. Toby Walker still juggles, but is working.
masterlegend10 1 year ago
@masterlegend10 He was at WJF 6? If he was there anyway, how much more trouble would it have been to win the overall championship?? :)
IRNjuggle28 1 year ago
@IRNjuggle28 It wouldn't have been much trouble for him to win, our right but he only went there to visit for couple or a few days. He wouldnt have been able to compete in all the competitions he wanted to.
masterlegend10 1 year ago
So there. See you on saturday steve!
askowalc 1 year ago
In this case, 12 ring syncronized passing (ultimates). This pattern is similar in fashion (when you look at it) to 6 ball wimpy. Steve and Richard successfully demonstrate an Over and Back phenomenon. This looks like a 6 ball wimpy qualify. Additionally, they are doing the same amount of work (individually) as you would if you were just trying to qualify 6 rings sycnronized by yourself (12 throws, 12 catches each). Therefore, I think without question should indeed be considered a qualify.
askowalc 1 year ago
Regarding all the qualifying drama:
In a cascade pattern, such as with three balls, a qualify would occur when the last ball of the three to be thrown reaches one hand and then the other, what I could call an "over and back" phenomenon. In other words, over and back signifies a qualify when it is attached to the last ball to thrown from the start of the cascade pattern. Let's extend this notion to passing. NEXT COMMENT
askowalc 1 year ago
Awesome!
OliverWagener 1 year ago
AWSOME! I was in the other room when this happened :( lol
gabrielfamilathe 1 year ago
what was funny though?
TedTracy 1 year ago
@TedTracy It won't be funny if I type it here... you had to be there.
thegoheads 1 year ago
rockin! Wjf is inspiring is it not?
MadJuggler97531 1 year ago
keep going with the wjf videos please :)
it doesn't air on tv.... :(
AsafAlkobi 1 year ago
epic. keep these wjf videos coming steve
lewisjmkennedy01 1 year ago
hardcore man wtf!
kzSoUlFaThEr 1 year ago
Who cares if you qualified or not?!
The point is that it was extremeley difficult!
KAGEJOSE 1 year ago
@KAGEJOSE Right on!
bballrocks59036 1 year ago
the rule for qualifying is hands*number of props = catches needed.
therefore you need 48... sorry.
pats4patrick213 1 year ago
@pats4patrick213 wait so if you want to qualify say 4 balls in one hand you only need 4 catches? o.o
ltsjack 1 year ago
@ltsjack i suppose although ive never heard someone saying theyve qualified x balls in one hand. usually 4 balls in one hand is notated 80 too.
pats4patrick213 1 year ago
I think 24 is right because you could look at each pair of hands passing to each other as if they were one person's hands qualifying (6x,6x).
I actually can't think of any reason why it should be 48, number of hands shouldn't matter - although thinking about 12 in different numbers of hands trying to prove myself wrong is frazzling my brain a little bit.
Good stuff anyway. haha.
Mike88441 1 year ago
Well, the IJA rules says it's the number of objects quadrupled. Not that it really matters either way.
jernqvist 1 year ago
Well done guys !
ericsurf6 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AWESOME steve and richard! when I saw the title and thumbnail I actually thought it was going to be someone like Gatto qualifying 12 rings with only 2 hands(disappointed....=) but this is still awesome!
jlspma 1 year ago 2
AWESOME steve and richard! when I saw the title and thumbnail I actually thought it was going to be someone like Gatto qualifying 12 rings with only 2 hands(disappointed....=) but this is still awesome!
jlspma 1 year ago
I say 48 total for a juggle but I don't have that many fingers so my math could be off.
DampRabbitVideo 1 year ago
:O Awesome!!
eMretsiM 1 year ago
SWEET! have fun at wjf6 and looking forward for more!!
MrMdiabolo 1 year ago
AWESOMEEEE!
But even more is the fact that you did it in the ring where exhibitions are executed lol
Let's see. In Passing only the passes count as catches, but as you did ultimates there's no selves and then every throw is a catch (since the run is clean)
I hear that a qualify is (props)x(hands) which would make 48 the correct answer. But that means that every hand in the pattern would have thrown each prop at least once. But evens don't cross, so I think 24 is the right answer then.
bozobozo 1 year ago