Added: 4 years ago
From: toytrains1
Views: 39,514
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I believe this was a non catalogued item, released about 2004 I bought one about 2 weeks ago new that I found on the intermet. Beautiful. 5/25/10

  • @toytrains1 In fact, it was worse than anthracite coal, it was a coal waste product known as culm that was useless in a normal firebox. You had to burn a ton of it, but it was very cheap, and the Reading had access to it. In fact, many non-camelbacks burned anthracite coal

  • this things wild.

  • There were so many different types of camelbacks that comparison is difficult. If you compare it to a Jersey Central 10-wheeler camelback, like the #774 for example, this was about double the weight.

  • how much bigger is this camelback compared to other camelbacks

  • The wide firebox was required since these locomotives burned anthracite coal rather than the more usual bituminous.

  • I believe that the Camelback style cabs allowed for a larger firebox area, giving the locomotive more power.

  • From what I read about 0-8-8-0's is that they were used as very heavy switchers, although two 0-8-0's could accomplish the same task with smaller engines.

  • wow that is cool!

  • I have never seen that engine. What catalog? oh, Nice though

  • Ahh.. Erie and their camelbacks..

  • what catalog was that in?

  • cool and shiny blue

  • Wow !!! That is a really nice steamer. Very unique

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more