Wait?? You're making fun of the Taurus for being discontinued for two years? How about the Malibu which was replaced by the name "Celebrity" from 1983-1990 and then the "Lumina" and/or "Corsica" during the 90s? These videos are f***ing hilarious!
okay 1st of all that chasi is used in cadillac,saturn,sab,buick so its still pritty much rebadged two. so your hypocritical to say that. and plus right now
2011
theres a sho 365hp
compared to the 260-280 of the malabu or whatever right now the ford taurus is a better car.
(in the lame announcer voice) ... except the Malibu is going break in 6 years, and the Taurus stole the reliability and quality crown from the Camry ...
Fuck you and your Malibu too... I've driven both, and the Taurus beats it hands down in practicality... I don't see Ford asking pimp Obama for some government cheese. Maybe if Chevy stopped trying to dazzle the public with trinkets like paddle shift, they might not need taxpayer handouts.
The new Malibu was the north american car in the world whoopy. That's like the golden globe of car awards. It was never Motor Trend car of the year which is like the Oscar of car awards. Furthermore the 2010 Taurus will blow the new Malibu right off of its wheels.
Dude YOU'RE lame...at least the taurus doesn't come in a diarhea brown leather interior...and you seem to have forgotten the "rental" malibu this car evolved from, so ya you're pretty stupid.
The 2 cars are not in the same class. The Taurus competes with the Impala not the Malibu. The Malibu competes with Fusion. This is why GM is failing, they're to busy trying to compete with Ford. They need to compete with Honda and Toyota. Ford is coming out with a hybrid Fusion that will get better gas mileage than Hybrid Accord and Camry. Ford has moved past GM concentrating on new rivals. The Japanese, GM and Chrysler are still thinking about the 60's. This is they will go out of Business.
i agree with u, ford has been makin good come backs, i really like the new fusion & taurus, the mailbu hybrid isnt all that great, the gas mileage isnt as good as its competitors. plus the gov't owns gm which is not good, & gm is still behind the japanese cars in reliability in contrast, the fusion is more reliable than the camry so ford has come a long way unlike chrysler & gm.
yep, ford has been getn their crap together. the CEO restructured the company's debt a while back before the recession, now they dont have to panic and can spend more time on quality, not the mention the little Fiesta is being released in the US and their upcoming replacing of the Triton V8s. they are bringing back the 5.0 and the 6.2, as well as a new 6.7 powerstroke diesel
Their both nice cars, but I don't know which is better. I've always felt that Malibu was kind of an grandma car whereas the old Taurus model was a pile of crap! The new models for both cars are very nice, but I would go with the ford for the style and luxury. The taurus (as far as design goes) is just a Five Hundred with the name Taurus slapped on.
Sorry I am sticking with the Ford. All new GM products just don't have it when it comes to reliability. If it wasn't for GM our shop would go out of business. The old GM cars were better but Ford has almost got it's quality equal to Toyota and Honda. So while your Malibu is in the shop I will still be on the road in my 03 Taurus with over 145,000 miles and it gives me no trouble.
LAME WTF???? the TAURUS isnt lame and it is a hell lot better looking than the MAILBU i mean did you see the front of it and the rear of the car is just as shitty looking as the front
The chevy malibu is amazing. Tarus has more horsepower. However,that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums. The Chevrolet produces fewer smog-forming pollutants per 15,000 miles than the Taurus.Malibu cost $19,345 - 26,345.Taurus costs $23,245 - $29,080.
The Malibu is totally redesigned so you can't compare it to the Vectra.
The Malibu is much better looking than either the taurus or Fusion. It's cheaper (the cheapest hybrid you can buy). It's got a much better interior. A better warranty. It's BETTER!!! The Fords don't beat it in any way!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
IMHO, I think the 2008 Honda Accord is better than both of them, but if I had to pick between the the two, it would be the Ford Taurus because generally Ford makes better cars, in terms of reliability and quality than Chevy. (Statistics from Consumer Reports)
The only thing good about this video was the editing. But why do people like to compare cars from 2 different classes. If you want to compare the Taurus, compare it to the impala. or compare the malibu to the Fusion.
Lame? Thats strange because it have 260+ hp and beats the Malibu in everything form safty to proformance. I guess you will just have to redefine lame for us educated people.
Ford replaced the Taurus with the 500. Yeah, Ford, for the most part renamed the 500 and called it the Taurus. However, The Malibu replaced what? The Chevy Lumina. Both the Lumina and Malibu are LAME.
That Malibu is ugly as a butt, your are an ignorante asshole the first Taurus is one of the most important vehicles in the history of automobile history.
chevy sucks chevrolet= Cheap Hastly Enginered Vehicle Running On Luck Evey Time. the taurus has out sold the malibu every year and its a more reliable car,
Ford Suck Ford= Fix Or Repair Daily,The Camry outsold the Malibu and tauras sales combined
there is a lot of chicks driving mustangs but I have seen just as much driving camaros but I do think when the challenger comes out it going to sell like crazy
how could chevy steal the retro styling idea? They had their own retro cars and decided to incorporate retro styling for their upcoming Camaro, which has a long history in the U.S.
when the 2005 mustang came out is was a mix of the new and old styling and now the 2009 camaro is desighned with the mix of the new and old styling therfore where do you think chevy got there idea from [the mustang]
I love that video, forget what I think about either car that was great marketing. Now as to the heart of the matter yes Ford is lame Filp floping is very lame, but the jury is still out on whether the Malibu is lame to.
in 2001 they gained 5 horspower from the 305 horsepower, but anyway they stoped making them because sales were not good [the mustang was outselling them] and the 2009 camaro is so ugly compared to the mustang i really cant see how anyone could like the way it looks.
my point is that chevys motor are a sitload bigger than fords and only produce a little more power like the mustang has the 4.6 liter and produces 300 horsepower and the camaro has the 5.7 and produces only 305 horsepower only 5 more horsepower same thing goes for the crown vic and caprice theres a difference of only 5 or ten horsepower but neither of those chevys are made anymore because they sucked compared to the fords. the mustang and crown vic were always better than the camaro and caprice
no chevy needs a motor thats twice the size as fords to get just a little more power like fords 4.6 in the crown vic and the 5.7 in the caprice the same goes for the mustang and camaro because pussy ass chevy needs big motors to compete with there compition so fuck you scarface00769
notice the differnce in engine size, a 7.0 chevy against a 5.4 ford thats what im saying chevy needs a bigger engine to compete with ford and ford is able to extract the most power out of a smaller engine
ok experience says all. thats all i have to say. by the way learn grammer, it's "THEY'RE" not they, but I guess if you like GM, you are dumb so it's ok
Now There's an American car that has exactly what we've been looking for,
TAURUS!!!
Taurus,
For US!!!
Chevys are uninnovative and GM only lasted this long as the top automaker because they have more lame companies to make ugly cars, which in fact are disintigrating, because they're STILL LAME.
HAHA!!!! I dont care what you think cause Ford is better ANYWAY!!!!!
no chevy needs a motor thats twice the size as fords to get just a little more power like fords 4.6 in the crown vic and the 5.7 in the caprice the same goes for the mustang and camaro because pussy ass chevy needs big motors to compete with there compition so fuck you scarface00769
ghtyvn...You know the Chevy Impala? It's a full size sedan. The 2008 Malibu is longer than the 2008 Chevy Impala, so I guess it's fair to compare the Malibu to the Taurus.
The back seats in the old and new Impalas are huge.
Last, you have no clue what you're talking about. You sat in an '07 Malibu SS at the auto show. Did that look anything like the new '08 Malibu pictured here? The new '08 Malibu is larger than the current '08 Impala. The new Malibu is a huge car. It's just as long, if not longer than the new '08 Taurus.
And who the fuck is behind "DriveMalibu2008"? Some idiot in their Mom's basement who really loves GM Products. And another question.....Where is Roger?
I just looked at the 2008 Malibu, it looks nice on the outside but the interior is dreadful. The Taurus still beats in everything that matters. More Horsepower, more features, better safety, faster 0-60. I like some GM products but right now GM is really not building a quality product. And I hope that Ford brings back the Taurus SHO, that would be awesome.
Oh yeah, and even though they don't compete, the 2008 malibu has 144 hp stock and 240 in the ss. The mighty taurus has 263hp stock with 2 more gears in the transmission. So yeah, again, very lame malibu.
Wrong, fizzely1 the 2008 Malibu has a 2.4 liter 164bhp 4 cylinder ecotec engine availible and a 3.6 liter 252bhp V-6 availible. The 4 cylinder is availible on all models and can be paired with a 4 speed auto or 6 speed manumatic. The V-6 is only availible with the 6 speed manumatic tranny. Sounds better than the Taurus to me. Get your facts straight.
My bad "GeneralMotorsSucks," It is the 07 malibu that has those specs. And, nonetheless, 263 stock is still better than the available 252. And one more thing, it is not a 'manumatic,' it is simply a six-speed automatic. So, the Taurus still sounds better, and best of all, it's available now at your local Ford dealership! Should I put you down for a test drive?
Actually, idiot, it is a manumatic. Do you even know what that means? It's automatic, but it can be shifted manually with paddles on the back of the steering wheel. At least argue the facts, genius. What the hell do you know about GM? Apparently not much.
Ya, I know. By the way, the Taurus isn't at all a bad car, just get your facts straight about the Malibu. Remember that the real fight is domestics versus foriegners, not domestics against domestics. "United we stand, divided we fall" support America and buy American cars, whether you like GM, Ford or Chrysler!
Oh sure, I mean, Malibu is fine. I just like Ford. And actually, I don't see myself buying either one in the near future, not with a mustang. But yeah, I live in the Detroit area so domestic dominates around here, but on a recent trip down south, honda, nissan, toyota dominated the market. That's really sad. You know what's even worse? I see bumper stickers about "my son is a marine" or "proud to be an American" on foreign cars. Like, then why don't you support America? Crazy.
Finally someone who agrees with me. It is really sad to see stickers like that on foriegn cars--why don't they support America? Must be really cool living in Detroit. Do you see a lot of camo test vehicles?
Not a lot. But I know someone who works for TRW so he gets there test cars for the weekend all the time. Sometimes he gets Mustang GTs, he got and Edge, the Taurus, CX-7, pretty cool.
That's right, I'm an advocate of the idea of buying American only. Ford, Toyota, GM, Honda, Chrysler, etc. are all American so long as they're built here (for instance, I'd rather buy a Tennessee-built Nissan Altima than a Mexico-built Ford Fusion). And in this case, both the Taurus and Malibu are American. So you shouldn't be bashing another American-built car.
I'm sorry, but you're quite stupid. Honda and Toyota are Japanese companies. Even if SOME Honda's and Toyotas are built in the USA, a lot of that money goes to Japan's economy. There are 3 and only 3 American automobile manufactures: GM, Ford and Chrysler.
alright maybe i exaggerated when i said "no chance", but my dad's truck still by about a truck length and a half buddy so unless you have both these trucks and have put them up against each other, please don't argue because it's pointless as your "theories" don't work in real life because i have done it and was simply stating what it was
The Malibu is very unattractive vehicle. You should look into the new 2008 Taurus. Everything is excellent in the vehicle from Safety, Styling, Engine, Drivetrain, and features. I'm pretty sure that the new Taurus would beat the Malibu and the Impala in just about everything. The only thing good about the Malibu is there aren't a lot on the road for obvious reasons.
Well, buzman1985, first off the 2008 Malibu isn't availible yet, so that might have something to do with very few of them on the road. Also, have you seen the '08 Malibu's new interior design, the Taurus doesn't even compare, no kidding!
Oh I forgot to add...since the new Taurus actually competes much more closely with the Impala you might want to know that while the Taurus has an excellent Volvo S80 chassis under it...the Impala has a 1989 Chevy Lumina chassis under it...Now that's LAME!!! HAHAHAHA!
This is a stupid video. The Taurus and Malibu don't even compete in the same class. The Taurus and the Impala compete against each other and the Fusion and Malibu compete against each other. I think the Fusion looks WAY better then the ugly Malibu. I am sure the Fusion will handle better too being. The new Taurus KILLS the old W-body Impala.
first off i'm not a redneck i'm from canada. and go read a road and track magazine instead of watching a youtube video if you want proof the gt is the better car. and as for trucks, my dad has a 07 LTZ with the vortecmax and it has no chance against my uncle's harley davidson f-150 (trust me, i've tried). so next time you start making these claims buddy how bout you get out of your deville, drive a real car, and then shut your trap
haha douchebag, the callaway company supercharged the 7.0L LS7 of the new Z06 vette and it still couldn't take the 5.4L supercharged in the Ford GT. Look it up
AAAAnddd, in trucks, Chevy needs a 6.0L 367HP V8 to match (not even - better word is keep up) what the 5.4L 300Hp Tritons can do. Pretty sure the F-150s don't come supercharged now do they?
What a retarded video. Is pretty stupid all the way but when that but ugly Malibu that has been around for ages shows up, it actually made me laugh. What an ugly, boring and stupid looking car that Malibu is. Question: doesn't the Taurus compete with the Impala? The Malibu competes with the Fusion, and the Fusion is killing the Malibu.
Im a taurus fan, but the new Taurus' aren't taurus' at all. If ford thinks they can pass that 500 off as the Taurus, they're sadly mistaken. Honetsly. I think the golden years of the taurus (92-94) are long gone. THose years had the nicest looking body design, and best mechanical reliability. I wont say anythin about the malibu, cause i know nothing about it.
Well, for one thing there was a short line of 2007s. So you are wrong there, and, I left a malibu ss in my side view mirror with my sable, so sorry, but the malibu seems a little lame to me.
fuck ford 500 fuck chevy malibu is all about the acura nsx with 290-hp 3.2-liter V6 not to mention a 8000 rpm redline no turbo or supercharger needed try to do that with a ford or chevy.
(cont'd) jeez...stop bashing ford, they're hitting a rough patch. sorry, im just a big fan of the taurus/sable lines, cuz of the SHO and BBTS . com. check it out, ull see what I mean.
wow, the 'bu (a running joke...shitty gm quality led to "MALI" to fall off a friends MALI-BU)looks even more retarded then ever. try a malibu against a taurus 'tec and see who wins. lame-that word alone describes the look of the new 'bu with its retarded grill that is far too big, and the lights which are way to ugly. the 'bu looked ugly ALWAYS!!!
you're a loser. taurus will have a 260 hp V6 bitch beat that. and that's not even an SS. fords on top of their game buddy. they have the fastest american cars and the most powerful. go lick your malibu
fuck ford 500 fuck chevy malibu is all about the acura nsx with 290-hp 3.2-liter V6 not to mention a 8000 rpm redline no turbo or supercharger needed try to do that with a ford or chevy. and a 12 sec 1/4 mile time bone stock time to start crying domestics.
The new Taurus does not compete against the Malibu, it competes against the Impala. The Malibu competes against the Fusion. I think the Fusion looks way better then the Malibu anyhow.
chevy sucks chevrolet= Cheap Hastly Enginered Vehicle Running On Luck Evey Time. the taurus has out sold the malibu every year and its a more reliable car
I don't mind Chevrolet. I like both Chevy And ford. As long as there is an American name on the vehicle. I hate stupid crappy foreign cars. My grandfather retired from ford.
Wait?? You're making fun of the Taurus for being discontinued for two years? How about the Malibu which was replaced by the name "Celebrity" from 1983-1990 and then the "Lumina" and/or "Corsica" during the 90s? These videos are f***ing hilarious!
skaterdudey77 6 months ago
and plusss there not even competitors. so theres that two
ADAMYESHOMO 10 months ago
okay 1st of all that chasi is used in cadillac,saturn,sab,buick so its still pritty much rebadged two. so your hypocritical to say that. and plus right now
2011
theres a sho 365hp
compared to the 260-280 of the malabu or whatever right now the ford taurus is a better car.
ADAMYESHOMO 10 months ago
ROFLMBO...this vid iz funny
19MarcusH31190 1 year ago
Duh the Taurus and Impala/Lumina are in the same class the Malibu is in Class with the Fusion and the Focus is with the Colbalt. It's simple math.
SaraP1900 1 year ago
(in the lame announcer voice) ... except the Malibu is going break in 6 years, and the Taurus stole the reliability and quality crown from the Camry ...
andrewbt1991 2 years ago
dude the ford taurus rapes and kills the malibu chevy and gmc freking sucks!!!! gmc=gay mans car or, goverment motors crap.
franf7 2 years ago
@franf7 haha i agree
IJDS99 1 year ago
Fuck you and your Malibu too... I've driven both, and the Taurus beats it hands down in practicality... I don't see Ford asking pimp Obama for some government cheese. Maybe if Chevy stopped trying to dazzle the public with trinkets like paddle shift, they might not need taxpayer handouts.
pixltv1 2 years ago
LULZ at "Chevrolet doesn't flip-flop". In 2004 the N-body Malibu was re-named the "Classic" and sold to rental fleets.
Also, seconded that the Taurus and Malibu are in different EPA size classes anyways.
flychinook 2 years ago
wow that was gay. the 2010 taurus will kill the malibu.
steve9509 3 years ago
@steve9509 wrong.
SaraP1900 1 year ago
@SaraP1900 nah it already did, but didnt really need to considering the fusion it competes with already did ;)
steve9509 1 year ago
@steve9509 Your right I know nothing. I looked the Taurus on Wikipedia and the Ford 500 replaced it then in 2008 they changed it back.
SaraP1900 1 year ago
The new Malibu was the north american car in the world whoopy. That's like the golden globe of car awards. It was never Motor Trend car of the year which is like the Oscar of car awards. Furthermore the 2010 Taurus will blow the new Malibu right off of its wheels.
SteelCity1981 3 years ago
malibu is the car of the year and i own one and love it, my car would blow any taurus off the road!
slimlova1990 3 years ago
Yes It will I have one too....
smbmp15 2 years ago
Dude YOU'RE lame...at least the taurus doesn't come in a diarhea brown leather interior...and you seem to have forgotten the "rental" malibu this car evolved from, so ya you're pretty stupid.
yellowmusicfreak 3 years ago
The 2 cars are not in the same class. The Taurus competes with the Impala not the Malibu. The Malibu competes with Fusion. This is why GM is failing, they're to busy trying to compete with Ford. They need to compete with Honda and Toyota. Ford is coming out with a hybrid Fusion that will get better gas mileage than Hybrid Accord and Camry. Ford has moved past GM concentrating on new rivals. The Japanese, GM and Chrysler are still thinking about the 60's. This is they will go out of Business.
fitz207 3 years ago 4
Thank you! i hope GM and Chrysler dont go down but shit get with it already
zo0yoRk69 3 years ago
i agree with u, ford has been makin good come backs, i really like the new fusion & taurus, the mailbu hybrid isnt all that great, the gas mileage isnt as good as its competitors. plus the gov't owns gm which is not good, & gm is still behind the japanese cars in reliability in contrast, the fusion is more reliable than the camry so ford has come a long way unlike chrysler & gm.
Toyotacrossover 2 years ago
yep, ford has been getn their crap together. the CEO restructured the company's debt a while back before the recession, now they dont have to panic and can spend more time on quality, not the mention the little Fiesta is being released in the US and their upcoming replacing of the Triton V8s. they are bringing back the 5.0 and the 6.2, as well as a new 6.7 powerstroke diesel
andrewbt1991 2 years ago
@fitz207 i agree! ford didnt ask for a bailout, also the mailbu hybrid gets gas mileage tht ranks below its competitors
IJDS99 1 year ago
Pontiac G8 GT FTW!
bigringd 3 years ago
fuck that taures is much better
sardiq 3 years ago
The last good malibu was the 83 model you retard.
Lumotaku 3 years ago
You are lame... Taurus is way better than Malibu which is butt ugly btw.
I have both a Ford and a Chevrolet and the Chevrolet has the worse interior finishes EVER.
I also own an 86" Taurus and an 88" Merc Sclass and the Taurus is better equiped than the merc and has interior materials which are in equal quality.
I gotta agree that materials on Gen 02 Tauruses are cheaper though.
Kpeters 3 years ago
malibu is car of the year.
ckmacboy 3 years ago
On second thought forget both cars. I want an Impala!
chasetrussel 3 years ago
Their both nice cars, but I don't know which is better. I've always felt that Malibu was kind of an grandma car whereas the old Taurus model was a pile of crap! The new models for both cars are very nice, but I would go with the ford for the style and luxury. The taurus (as far as design goes) is just a Five Hundred with the name Taurus slapped on.
chasetrussel 3 years ago
No man your lame-the Taurus is huge!
bahamiangreek101 3 years ago
this video is LAME i want my min back
12344bam 3 years ago 2
your voice makes me want to kill myself
htayahg32 3 years ago 2
no dude you are lame
Drejrunner 3 years ago 2
Sorry I am sticking with the Ford. All new GM products just don't have it when it comes to reliability. If it wasn't for GM our shop would go out of business. The old GM cars were better but Ford has almost got it's quality equal to Toyota and Honda. So while your Malibu is in the shop I will still be on the road in my 03 Taurus with over 145,000 miles and it gives me no trouble.
kcsoklahoma 3 years ago 2
you know whats lame?...this video
FordFanatic59 3 years ago
malibu's suck donkey balls
electrohacker 3 years ago
Put the Malibu against an SHO and see who is lame then.
xm177fullauto 3 years ago
loved it
GHGKDNKNCKLSZ 3 years ago
you are lame not the taurus
best car i could ever get in europe...
mercedes and bmw burn in hell.....
standard1997 3 years ago
Taurus looks nicer then a malibu and anyways I think taurus competes with impala anyways..
quatlen 3 years ago 2
I just love the new design of the Taurus but it seemed I was the only one :D
ThMaSiKo 3 years ago
Taurus looks nicer then a malibu and anyways I think taurus competes with impala anyways..
quatlen 3 years ago
LAME WTF???? the TAURUS isnt lame and it is a hell lot better looking than the MAILBU i mean did you see the front of it and the rear of the car is just as shitty looking as the front
twawasthebest 4 years ago
The chevy malibu is amazing. Tarus has more horsepower. However,that high horsepower engines often command higher insurance premiums. The Chevrolet produces fewer smog-forming pollutants per 15,000 miles than the Taurus.Malibu cost $19,345 - 26,345.Taurus costs $23,245 - $29,080.
brokenwing101 4 years ago
malibu is closer to the fusion , and the fusion is just better anyway.
tarus vs. malibu - like volvo vs malibu
i'll take the volvo/ford over the malibu/vectra p.o.s.
otterhead45 3 years ago
The Malibu is totally redesigned so you can't compare it to the Vectra.
The Malibu is much better looking than either the taurus or Fusion. It's cheaper (the cheapest hybrid you can buy). It's got a much better interior. A better warranty. It's BETTER!!! The Fords don't beat it in any way!!
brokenwing101 3 years ago
malibu is not ALL NEW
and it is based on the vectra
malibu is not all new
and it shares engines with opel/vauxhall/holden
i have driven these things
i got a fusion
otterhead45 3 years ago
dont argue with a yank about chevys or fords - we got alot of them over here
and we are experts on them
the malibu is not a totally new car
it is a redesign
saturn aura/pontiac g6/malibu/vectra/
shit-box
otterhead45 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
IMHO, I think the 2008 Honda Accord is better than both of them, but if I had to pick between the the two, it would be the Ford Taurus because generally Ford makes better cars, in terms of reliability and quality than Chevy. (Statistics from Consumer Reports)
LtCarman 4 years ago
The only thing good about this video was the editing. But why do people like to compare cars from 2 different classes. If you want to compare the Taurus, compare it to the impala. or compare the malibu to the Fusion.
crabby125 4 years ago
Lame? Thats strange because it have 260+ hp and beats the Malibu in everything form safty to proformance. I guess you will just have to redefine lame for us educated people.
middleton61 4 years ago
That is not a GM sponsored ad. You cant judge the new malibu on its past. This Malibu is larger and more powerful, and much better in quality.
SDR450R 4 years ago
Ford replaced the Taurus with the 500. Yeah, Ford, for the most part renamed the 500 and called it the Taurus. However, The Malibu replaced what? The Chevy Lumina. Both the Lumina and Malibu are LAME.
mildassets 4 years ago
Say what you will about the Taurus Now,
But when the SHO Come back it gonna kill,
If you did not know it gonna ave 415hp and advanced AWD
ghtyvn 4 years ago 3
@ghtyvn what happened to the 415 HP bitch, cuz it never had that much
LTRules21 4 weeks ago
I hope it has headgasket problems you hater. Without the Taurus GM would still be building 3 ton boats.
I was interested in the Malibu until I saw this.
darthenstein 4 years ago 3
thank u whoever made this video must of been molested so he must take out his frustration on Fords
maddog24637 4 years ago 3
That Malibu is ugly as a butt, your are an ignorante asshole the first Taurus is one of the most important vehicles in the history of automobile history.
Kpeters 4 years ago
chevy sucks chevrolet= Cheap Hastly Enginered Vehicle Running On Luck Evey Time. the taurus has out sold the malibu every year and its a more reliable car,
Ford Suck Ford= Fix Or Repair Daily,The Camry outsold the Malibu and tauras sales combined
Shadao38 4 years ago
the taurus was the number one selling family sedan untill 1996 or 1997 then the camry took over
andytaurus 4 years ago
get off the bus ricer.
hypersupermamado 4 years ago
im not sure witch is faster the challenger or camaro do you know?
andytaurus 4 years ago
there is a lot of chicks driving mustangs but I have seen just as much driving camaros but I do think when the challenger comes out it going to sell like crazy
andytaurus 4 years ago
chevy stole fords idea on the retro styling , i bet the mustang will still outsell the camaro when it comes out[the always have and always will]
andytaurus 4 years ago
how could chevy steal the retro styling idea? They had their own retro cars and decided to incorporate retro styling for their upcoming Camaro, which has a long history in the U.S.
friedtube 4 years ago
when the 2005 mustang came out is was a mix of the new and old styling and now the 2009 camaro is desighned with the mix of the new and old styling therfore where do you think chevy got there idea from [the mustang]
andytaurus 4 years ago
I love that video, forget what I think about either car that was great marketing. Now as to the heart of the matter yes Ford is lame Filp floping is very lame, but the jury is still out on whether the Malibu is lame to.
APoeticLife3 4 years ago
in 2001 they gained 5 horspower from the 305 horsepower, but anyway they stoped making them because sales were not good [the mustang was outselling them] and the 2009 camaro is so ugly compared to the mustang i really cant see how anyone could like the way it looks.
andytaurus 4 years ago
my point is that chevys motor are a sitload bigger than fords and only produce a little more power like the mustang has the 4.6 liter and produces 300 horsepower and the camaro has the 5.7 and produces only 305 horsepower only 5 more horsepower same thing goes for the crown vic and caprice theres a difference of only 5 or ten horsepower but neither of those chevys are made anymore because they sucked compared to the fords. the mustang and crown vic were always better than the camaro and caprice
andytaurus 4 years ago
you didnt get my point
andytaurus 4 years ago
no chevy needs a motor thats twice the size as fords to get just a little more power like fords 4.6 in the crown vic and the 5.7 in the caprice the same goes for the mustang and camaro because pussy ass chevy needs big motors to compete with there compition so fuck you scarface00769
andytaurus 4 years ago
notice the differnce in engine size, a 7.0 chevy against a 5.4 ford thats what im saying chevy needs a bigger engine to compete with ford and ford is able to extract the most power out of a smaller engine
andytaurus 4 years ago
so you just told me your 10 years old. grow up END OF DISCUSSION
seansuth 4 years ago
ok experience says all. thats all i have to say. by the way learn grammer, it's "THEY'RE" not they, but I guess if you like GM, you are dumb so it's ok
seansuth 4 years ago
ha! do you realize my dad owned peice of shit GMs for years, every one of them recalled something. the worst was that lumina. tic turd
seansuth 4 years ago
TAURUS RULES!!!!!!!!!!
Now There's an American car that has exactly what we've been looking for,
TAURUS!!!
Taurus,
For US!!!
Chevys are uninnovative and GM only lasted this long as the top automaker because they have more lame companies to make ugly cars, which in fact are disintigrating, because they're STILL LAME.
HAHA!!!! I dont care what you think cause Ford is better ANYWAY!!!!!
Have you driven a Ford....Lately???
macmacs1992 4 years ago
no chevy needs a motor thats twice the size as fords to get just a little more power like fords 4.6 in the crown vic and the 5.7 in the caprice the same goes for the mustang and camaro because pussy ass chevy needs big motors to compete with there compition so fuck you scarface00769
andytaurus 4 years ago
Wow I never saw the '08 malibu befor,
And damn, that car looks like shit!!! >_<
But wate...............
Dude Malibu is a mid size
And Turase is a Full size???
Why are they comparing them????
ghtyvn 4 years ago
ghtyvn...You know the Chevy Impala? It's a full size sedan. The 2008 Malibu is longer than the 2008 Chevy Impala, so I guess it's fair to compare the Malibu to the Taurus.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
Well Ok I know the Impala, But it is not A Full Size,
It meats the Requirements of a full size, But Chevy Call it a Mid Size,
Plus the new Impala is small in the back seat
And Dude are you for real????
The Malibu is small,
Like Small in the Driver Seat >_<
And I do know what I am talking about Cuz I was in an Impala SS and a Malibu Maxx SS at the Auto Show
ghtyvn 4 years ago
The Impala is full size.
I drive an '00 Impala and '06 Impala.
Impala=200in long.
Toyota Avalon(huge car)=197in long.
The back seats in the old and new Impalas are huge.
Last, you have no clue what you're talking about. You sat in an '07 Malibu SS at the auto show. Did that look anything like the new '08 Malibu pictured here? The new '08 Malibu is larger than the current '08 Impala. The new Malibu is a huge car. It's just as long, if not longer than the new '08 Taurus.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
Well I guess I dont know much about the New Malibu,
But I guess the Impalas Back seat is a matter of Perspective
ghtyvn 4 years ago
Go to Chevy's homepage and look at the old '07 Malibu. Then, go to "upcoming vehicles" and look at the new '08 Malibu. You'll learn a lot.
About the Impala's back seat, it kind of is a matter of perspective.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
Malibu Sucks
dialjake851 4 years ago
Who makes the fastest Production Truck on the market?
buzman1985 4 years ago
i dont give a fuck about trucks i was talking about sports cars.
magana559 4 years ago
Dodge make the fastest Production with the Ram SRT 500 with 500 hp capable of 160 mph
Shadao38 4 years ago
And who the fuck is behind "DriveMalibu2008"? Some idiot in their Mom's basement who really loves GM Products. And another question.....Where is Roger?
buzman1985 4 years ago
I just looked at the 2008 Malibu, it looks nice on the outside but the interior is dreadful. The Taurus still beats in everything that matters. More Horsepower, more features, better safety, faster 0-60. I like some GM products but right now GM is really not building a quality product. And I hope that Ford brings back the Taurus SHO, that would be awesome.
buzman1985 4 years ago
They're a piece of junk. Taurus has much more HP than the Mal-I-Bu.
townset 4 years ago
Oh yeah, and even though they don't compete, the 2008 malibu has 144 hp stock and 240 in the ss. The mighty taurus has 263hp stock with 2 more gears in the transmission. So yeah, again, very lame malibu.
fizzley1 4 years ago
Wrong, fizzely1 the 2008 Malibu has a 2.4 liter 164bhp 4 cylinder ecotec engine availible and a 3.6 liter 252bhp V-6 availible. The 4 cylinder is availible on all models and can be paired with a 4 speed auto or 6 speed manumatic. The V-6 is only availible with the 6 speed manumatic tranny. Sounds better than the Taurus to me. Get your facts straight.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
My bad "GeneralMotorsSucks," It is the 07 malibu that has those specs. And, nonetheless, 263 stock is still better than the available 252. And one more thing, it is not a 'manumatic,' it is simply a six-speed automatic. So, the Taurus still sounds better, and best of all, it's available now at your local Ford dealership! Should I put you down for a test drive?
fizzley1 4 years ago
Actually, idiot, it is a manumatic. Do you even know what that means? It's automatic, but it can be shifted manually with paddles on the back of the steering wheel. At least argue the facts, genius. What the hell do you know about GM? Apparently not much.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
Umm, yeah, but the Taurus doesn't have the stupid 'manumatic.' I knew that when I drove the TRW test car last May.
fizzley1 4 years ago
Ya, I know. By the way, the Taurus isn't at all a bad car, just get your facts straight about the Malibu. Remember that the real fight is domestics versus foriegners, not domestics against domestics. "United we stand, divided we fall" support America and buy American cars, whether you like GM, Ford or Chrysler!
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
Oh sure, I mean, Malibu is fine. I just like Ford. And actually, I don't see myself buying either one in the near future, not with a mustang. But yeah, I live in the Detroit area so domestic dominates around here, but on a recent trip down south, honda, nissan, toyota dominated the market. That's really sad. You know what's even worse? I see bumper stickers about "my son is a marine" or "proud to be an American" on foreign cars. Like, then why don't you support America? Crazy.
fizzley1 4 years ago
Finally someone who agrees with me. It is really sad to see stickers like that on foriegn cars--why don't they support America? Must be really cool living in Detroit. Do you see a lot of camo test vehicles?
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
Not a lot. But I know someone who works for TRW so he gets there test cars for the weekend all the time. Sometimes he gets Mustang GTs, he got and Edge, the Taurus, CX-7, pretty cool.
fizzley1 4 years ago
Cool.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
That's right, I'm an advocate of the idea of buying American only. Ford, Toyota, GM, Honda, Chrysler, etc. are all American so long as they're built here (for instance, I'd rather buy a Tennessee-built Nissan Altima than a Mexico-built Ford Fusion). And in this case, both the Taurus and Malibu are American. So you shouldn't be bashing another American-built car.
angrylittledude 4 years ago
I'm sorry, but you're quite stupid. Honda and Toyota are Japanese companies. Even if SOME Honda's and Toyotas are built in the USA, a lot of that money goes to Japan's economy. There are 3 and only 3 American automobile manufactures: GM, Ford and Chrysler.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
i know one thing about general motors, they suck and ford is a lot better
andytaurus 4 years ago
Right, I guess that's why GM made a huge comeback and Ford hasn't.
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
What big comeback has GM made? They could barley beat Toyota.
spursfan600 3 years ago
A huge comeback!
GeneralMotorsRules 3 years ago
So falling in second place to toyota is a huge comback?
spursfan600 3 years ago
Ya, the whole Toyota thing sure is dissapointing, but GM is still making a comeback. It's hard though with crazy labor unions keeping them down.
GeneralMotorsRules 3 years ago
alright maybe i exaggerated when i said "no chance", but my dad's truck still by about a truck length and a half buddy so unless you have both these trucks and have put them up against each other, please don't argue because it's pointless as your "theories" don't work in real life because i have done it and was simply stating what it was
joltfrey 4 years ago
The Malibu is very unattractive vehicle. You should look into the new 2008 Taurus. Everything is excellent in the vehicle from Safety, Styling, Engine, Drivetrain, and features. I'm pretty sure that the new Taurus would beat the Malibu and the Impala in just about everything. The only thing good about the Malibu is there aren't a lot on the road for obvious reasons.
buzman1985 4 years ago
Well, buzman1985, first off the 2008 Malibu isn't availible yet, so that might have something to do with very few of them on the road. Also, have you seen the '08 Malibu's new interior design, the Taurus doesn't even compare, no kidding!
GeneralMotorsRules 4 years ago
Oh I forgot to add...since the new Taurus actually competes much more closely with the Impala you might want to know that while the Taurus has an excellent Volvo S80 chassis under it...the Impala has a 1989 Chevy Lumina chassis under it...Now that's LAME!!! HAHAHAHA!
yamajammer76 4 years ago
This is a stupid video. The Taurus and Malibu don't even compete in the same class. The Taurus and the Impala compete against each other and the Fusion and Malibu compete against each other. I think the Fusion looks WAY better then the ugly Malibu. I am sure the Fusion will handle better too being. The new Taurus KILLS the old W-body Impala.
yamajammer76 4 years ago
haha LMAO
lilshane93 4 years ago
first off i'm not a redneck i'm from canada. and go read a road and track magazine instead of watching a youtube video if you want proof the gt is the better car. and as for trucks, my dad has a 07 LTZ with the vortecmax and it has no chance against my uncle's harley davidson f-150 (trust me, i've tried). so next time you start making these claims buddy how bout you get out of your deville, drive a real car, and then shut your trap
joltfrey 4 years ago
haha douchebag, the callaway company supercharged the 7.0L LS7 of the new Z06 vette and it still couldn't take the 5.4L supercharged in the Ford GT. Look it up
AAAAnddd, in trucks, Chevy needs a 6.0L 367HP V8 to match (not even - better word is keep up) what the 5.4L 300Hp Tritons can do. Pretty sure the F-150s don't come supercharged now do they?
joltfrey 4 years ago
What a retarded video. Is pretty stupid all the way but when that but ugly Malibu that has been around for ages shows up, it actually made me laugh. What an ugly, boring and stupid looking car that Malibu is. Question: doesn't the Taurus compete with the Impala? The Malibu competes with the Fusion, and the Fusion is killing the Malibu.
sgomez64 4 years ago
That was by far the most retarded thing I've ever watched. The Malibu is ugly.... at least the Taurus looks classy.
Choikzilla 4 years ago
Im a taurus fan, but the new Taurus' aren't taurus' at all. If ford thinks they can pass that 500 off as the Taurus, they're sadly mistaken. Honetsly. I think the golden years of the taurus (92-94) are long gone. THose years had the nicest looking body design, and best mechanical reliability. I wont say anythin about the malibu, cause i know nothing about it.
metharine 4 years ago
Well, for one thing there was a short line of 2007s. So you are wrong there, and, I left a malibu ss in my side view mirror with my sable, so sorry, but the malibu seems a little lame to me.
fizzley1 4 years ago
I am a Acura man myself but the 08' Taurus would shit all over the Malibu on a track.....
thebionicpig 4 years ago
hey loser, the malibu competes with the Fusion not the taurus.
tony76ms 4 years ago
we know ... but the Taurus is still lame
driveMalibu2008 4 years ago
That's some infallible logic right there buddy, ahuhuhuh. Sound like an eight year old XD
twisteddragyn 4 years ago
the duratec taurus would smoke a malibu so i think the malibu is lame
andytaurus 4 years ago
fuck ford 500 fuck chevy malibu is all about the acura nsx with 290-hp 3.2-liter V6 not to mention a 8000 rpm redline no turbo or supercharger needed try to do that with a ford or chevy.
magana559 4 years ago
Fuck rice burners.
buzman1985 4 years ago
That was so funny!!! Hularious
BIGTONY07 4 years ago
Too bad the Malibu isn't a competitor to the Taurus.
lamborgotti 4 years ago
although both brands suck balls, that was quite funny
ld357 4 years ago
(cont'd) jeez...stop bashing ford, they're hitting a rough patch. sorry, im just a big fan of the taurus/sable lines, cuz of the SHO and BBTS . com. check it out, ull see what I mean.
xxgarmilsmi90xx 4 years ago
wow, the 'bu (a running joke...shitty gm quality led to "MALI" to fall off a friends MALI-BU)looks even more retarded then ever. try a malibu against a taurus 'tec and see who wins. lame-that word alone describes the look of the new 'bu with its retarded grill that is far too big, and the lights which are way to ugly. the 'bu looked ugly ALWAYS!!!
xxgarmilsmi90xx 4 years ago
These ads make me not want to drive a Malibu
danielperish 4 years ago
you're a loser. taurus will have a 260 hp V6 bitch beat that. and that's not even an SS. fords on top of their game buddy. they have the fastest american cars and the most powerful. go lick your malibu
joltfrey 4 years ago
fuck ford 500 fuck chevy malibu is all about the acura nsx with 290-hp 3.2-liter V6 not to mention a 8000 rpm redline no turbo or supercharger needed try to do that with a ford or chevy. and a 12 sec 1/4 mile time bone stock time to start crying domestics.
magana559 4 years ago
Maybe the taurus seems lame now, but when it was introduced in 1986, It was nothing short of revolutionary. damn reliable too
ghbbb123 4 years ago
The new Taurus does not compete against the Malibu, it competes against the Impala. The Malibu competes against the Fusion. I think the Fusion looks way better then the Malibu anyhow.
yamajammer76 4 years ago
chevy sucks chevrolet= Cheap Hastly Enginered Vehicle Running On Luck Evey Time. the taurus has out sold the malibu every year and its a more reliable car
andytaurus 4 years ago
I don't mind Chevrolet. I like both Chevy And ford. As long as there is an American name on the vehicle. I hate stupid crappy foreign cars. My grandfather retired from ford.
natenobate 4 years ago