Eliot Spitzer might of cheated, but does it really matter as much as people make it out to be? What he did didn't effect the public as a whole. Bankers ruin peoples lives, anti-gay rhetoric have lead to suicides, pro-lifers lead to the targeting and assassinations of doctors.
@KayleLang Spitzer was contributing to employment and the economy at the same time. Legalize prostitution in every state--make bankers pay 100x more than anyone else. Now that will jump start this economy.
It seems that the less you screw around, the worse a president you make. It may be unsavory, but it's true. Being a bounder makes you a better president.
the entitlement programs are their own entity and have a surplus until 2048 and thats if we dont add money into it we should never raise the retirement age or anything its called taxing the rich so the max they are paying is over 800 dollars
Yes, Social Security is a trust fund that doesn't contribute to the deficit, and it's solvent. Yes, the govt. has borrowed against it, and "all that's in there is a bunch-a IOUs"-Alan Simpson. But all that's in a bank is a bunch-a IOUs, and it doesn't seem to set THEM back any. Nobody calls it a Ponzie Scheme.
The only reason the plutocrats are obsessing over making SS private is because then the gamblers on Wall Street get to make billions in bonuses playing with the money.
@TrollBuster9090 not just that if they make it private then they are stealing our money because that is money we put into the system money the rich also paid into but can do without and get back in bush tax cuts
what is sams surname
optionsupdate 4 months ago
we need a president that embraces eliot's philsophy of " I'm a fucking steamroller"
127mcf 5 months ago
I like Spitzer. Something tells me he's sincere.
PurpleHoneyBear 5 months ago
This interviewer is the worst! Can hardly get a sentence going.
JanieHoffa 6 months ago
@JanieHoffa He's an excellent, informed interviewer. Perhaps not CNN ready but do you want depth or superficial bullshit, Janie.
samsbro1952 6 months ago
I still don't think it was a coincidence that Eliot was "outed" 6 months before the 2008 crash.
It kinda reminds me of how AlQueda assassinated the leader of the Northern Alliance just before 9-11.
When he resigned those Wall Street sociopaths celebrated.
If he was Gov. he would have gone after Goldman Sachs.
...pisses me off.
twosquirrelly 6 months ago
the USA has been a plutocracy from the beginning; the constitution was written by rich white landowners and slave owners !
brno22504 6 months ago
Rushing into a plutocracy? The USA has been a plutocracy from the very beginning. Founded by the merchants for the merchants.
donyunger 6 months ago
Valuable conversation. Great work as always Sam and team.
MichaelConrad1D 6 months ago
I would vote for Spitzer too. He's not a puppet so he could never win!
goldengyrl2010 6 months ago
Eliot Spitzer might of cheated, but does it really matter as much as people make it out to be? What he did didn't effect the public as a whole. Bankers ruin peoples lives, anti-gay rhetoric have lead to suicides, pro-lifers lead to the targeting and assassinations of doctors.
KayleLang 6 months ago
@KayleLang Spitzer was contributing to employment and the economy at the same time. Legalize prostitution in every state--make bankers pay 100x more than anyone else. Now that will jump start this economy.
goldengyrl2010 6 months ago
Becoming a plutocracy?
That ship sailed a long time ago, my friend.
Class warfare?
The class war was fought 30 years ago. We lost. We're now just trying to mount an insurgency to prevent a mass scale class genocide.
TrollBuster9090 6 months ago
Spitzer needs to run for president, I don't care who he slept with.
bungerman1000 6 months ago 27
@bungerman1000
Absolutely!
And, in fact, if you compare:
Bill Clinton vs. George Bush, or
JFK vs. Richard Nixon
It seems that the less you screw around, the worse a president you make. It may be unsavory, but it's true. Being a bounder makes you a better president.
TrollBuster9090 6 months ago
@TrollBuster9090 JFK would never sign NAFTA inot law
captcrais101 6 months ago
@captcrais101
Good point. Nor would he have signed Gramm-Leach-Bliley and the CFMA Acts, or put Rahm on the board of Freddie Mac on the way out the door.
TrollBuster9090 6 months ago
@bungerman1000 or at least run the SEC and ride heard on Wall street and the Banks!!!!!!!
redraven2682 6 months ago
the entitlement programs are their own entity and have a surplus until 2048 and thats if we dont add money into it we should never raise the retirement age or anything its called taxing the rich so the max they are paying is over 800 dollars
kazooga1234 6 months ago
@kazooga1234
Yes, Social Security is a trust fund that doesn't contribute to the deficit, and it's solvent. Yes, the govt. has borrowed against it, and "all that's in there is a bunch-a IOUs"-Alan Simpson. But all that's in a bank is a bunch-a IOUs, and it doesn't seem to set THEM back any. Nobody calls it a Ponzie Scheme.
The only reason the plutocrats are obsessing over making SS private is because then the gamblers on Wall Street get to make billions in bonuses playing with the money.
TrollBuster9090 6 months ago
@TrollBuster9090 not just that if they make it private then they are stealing our money because that is money we put into the system money the rich also paid into but can do without and get back in bush tax cuts
kazooga1234 6 months ago
Rushing into?
Already there.
whatisahumans 6 months ago 13