Added: 1 year ago
From: CitizensfortheRep
Views: 71,356
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (244)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Okay, Conservatives, you've held this President and the country hostage for two years by voting NO to every bit of progress and you got your way.....now shut up and produce.

  • @gcsecsi The insurance companies are forcing that redistribution of wealth but in the upward direction instead by people NOT having coverage. If you don't know that, then you don't know what you're talking about in the first place.

  • @gcsecsi You fucking horse molester.

  • @gcsecsi You sound like a fine Christian, you pole smoking homo.

  • .

    Remember the talk of healthcare rationing? Well, here's an outstanding explanation of how it truly is part of Obama's plans for Americans

    Watch-

    Dr. David Janda explains rationing and why Dr. Rob Steele must defeat Dingell.

    h t t p : // w w w . youtube . com/watch?v­=8HnkxIh62dQ

    Remember Obama's Science Czar, John Holdren & his book regarding forced abortions & compulsory sterolization - Ecoscience; plus of course, Cass Sunstein & his plans?

    Full version in related videos

  • People not working - Republicans mostly blocked the small business bill pushed by the administration and apparently think that hiring people to do infrastructure work is not a good way of creating jobs. Do Republicans think that's volunteer work?

    Foreclosures - Republicans are the ones saying people who got homes they couldn't afford should be foreclosed on while Obama has been saying this should be looked at.

    Debt - Obama wants to let taxes go up on the top 2% to start bringing it down.

  • @DisturbedHavok

    Republicans haven't had the power (numbers) to block anything. If they had, we wouldn't have the country burdened with that historically gigantic farce which has been falsely called a "health care reform" bill.

  • @qpwillie Republicans don't need them in the Senate. It takes 60 votes to overcome a filibuster and it only takes 1 Senator to trigger a filibuster - and they don't even have to say why they're filibustering something, they can just do it. It's why the House has passed a lot of bills and the Senate passes or defeats almost nothing - the Senate just leaves everything in limbo through filibusters.

  • @DisturbedHavok

    The Dems had enough to overcome any filibuster for most of the present term. However, it's not an issue here. The Republicans tried to filibuster anything.

    If they had let all that freedom damaging garbage get through when they could have stopped it, they'd be in as much trouble as the Democrats are right now. They'd better be the party of HELL NO!! to this anti-the people regime if they want their terms to last beyond two years. We the people are fed up.

  • @qpwillie You need to learn the current Senate rules because that's most definitely not the case. Obama is still missing a lot of nominees in key positions. Wall Street reform was blocked and many other things are still being blocked.

    So tell me - what "freedom damaging garbage" are you talking about?

  • @DisturbedHavok

    "So tell me - what "freedom damaging garbage" are you talking about?"

    Well, you could start with these. watch?v=HcBaSP31Be8

    I know you leftists claim they're not true but I HAVE read the bill so you'll be wasting your time.

    

  • @DisturbedHavok

    I could offer you more in the 60% of that bill that hasn't the faintest thing to do with health care, and then we could look at the other historically massive bills.

    The real issue is, they were passed against the obvious will of the majority. Beyond that, you can swallow all the propaganda and Obama lies you please.

  • @qpwillie The majority of Americans want a single payer system more along the lines of the UK or France. So if that's the "against the will of the people" you mean, I'm with you (by your tone though, I'm guessing you believe the lines being pushed by FOX News and the rest of the Conservative media).

  • @DisturbedHavok

    Nope, all the polls show that between 60% and 70% of the American people are against a "single payer"/communist system. That's a majority. Read the real polls. Not the propaganda spouted by MSNBC.

  • @qpwillie all the polls? No.

    Kaiser Health Tracking (July 09) - 58% Favor

    Time Magazine (July 09) - 49% Favor

    NYTimes/CBS News Poll (Feb. 09) - 59% Favor

    Quinnipiac poll in FL, PA, and OH (Apr 08) - 65% the gov't should provide adequate health care for all

    Need more?

    Remember, just because you feel it in your gut, doesn't mean it's true. Single payer isn't communism. The fact that you don't get that tells me you don't really know what communism is and are just blindly throwing labels around.

  • @DisturbedHavok

    Actually, I was talking about the real (scientific) polls, not a bunch of left wing propaganda rags. Actual credible polling agencies like Rasmussen, Gallup, The Harris Poll, The Democracy Corp (owned by James Carville and Stan Greenberg), etc.

    Watch the election results tonight for the most important poll of all.

  • @qpwillie Election results mean nothing if people choose not to vote. The question is, if EVERYONE was forced to vote (like in Australia) every year, would the majority support either major party this year? I would guess not, but we have a choice here and if Obama voters feel he didn't give them what they wanted, they would be staying home, so it doesn't mean they embrace Conservative ideals.

    As for polls, you dispute their math? Fine...

    Harris Poll Oct. 05 - 75% Strongly/Somewhat favor

  • @DisturbedHavok

    You don't need to repeat the excuses from the left. I heard them all when you were being programmed with them. You see, we even predicted them before they were used. It's easy when one retains the ability to do their own thinking and stand back and observe.

    "Election results mean nothing?" If that kind of thinking doesn't wake something up in you, I'm afraid you're too far gone.

  • @qpwillie programmed? Right. I showed you a poll from a source you asked for and you ignored it.

    I was making an intellectual point about the fact that MOST people don't vote in non-Presidential elections. Several people I work with said they only registered to vote last time so they could vote for Obama. He wasn't up for re-election this time, so they didn't vote. Also, if you feel that your guy won't win anyway, you have stuff to do, so you stay at home. It does happen you know.

  • @DisturbedHavok

    Obama's approval ratings are in the dumps and sinking. Voter remorse is at an all time high. People simply didn't take the time to find out who he is and got caught up in the well planned excitement.

    If people stayed at home because they felt their guy wouldn't win, there must be a reason why they felt he wouldn't win.

  • @DisturbedHavok

    Watch Obama's speech today (Although, I'm sure you wouldn't miss a chance to stare adoringly into his face for as long as he'll grant you.).

    He'll say people are angry because he didn't get enough done. ..And he'll blame the Republicans (Even though they were powerless to stop him from doing whatever he wanted to do). He'll probably say he didn't do enough to explain his intentions. Well, we know quite well his intentions and he he got FAR too much done toward them.

  • @qpwillie Done and he talked about working with Republicans to get problems solved. Republicans basically told him to fuck off and do things their way or no way (so the exact policies that they used in the first 6 years of the Bush administration to get us into this financial mess). Obama looked like an adult and they looked like children crying about a toy they deserve in the toy store.

  • @DisturbedHavok

    Actually, the Republicans offered many suggestions but Obama and the Democrats would have no part of it. They submitted the bills including their health care bill, HR 3962 and other suggestions that would fix the problems without taking away people's rights or going against the constitution.

    I know Obama said they didn't offer anything but as always, Obama lied.

  • @DisturbedHavok

    If you really want to know what happened to the economy, watch these videos and start using your own brain. watch?v=ivmL-lXNy64

    watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

  • @DisturbedHavok

    I would expect those 150 people who still read the New York Times and listen to CBS to vote that way.

  • @qpwillie Do you even know how polling works and by that insult, I have to ask, are you 12?

  • Regan ran the deficit up mo0re than any other president other than GW Bush. When the republicans do gain control, they will screw up just as they always do. And you people who back that idiot Sarah Palin need to get your red neck ass heads out of the sand. Can you imagine that bimbo deciding if we go to war or not? WAKE UP people!!!

  • Republicans Harding and Hoover then brought in the roaring 20s because they reversed much of Wilsons policies, the Herbert Hoover (the first RINO) and FDR combined to not only bring in the great depression, but FDR compounded it intentionally then hijacked the presidency (this is why term limits on the presidency came about). History keeps repeating itself... Carter massive recession and defense cuts, oil embargo, Iran hostages (democrat), Reagan spending went up but so did jobs & economy

  • Comment removed

  • G-sus people. Ronnie is molding in the grave. Give it up.

  • Which ad experts?

  • This country yearns for a leader like you Mr. Reagain, Rest in Peace Sir!

  • the ad experts say this ad is pure genius

  • God Bless Mr. Reagan! This country will elect a Reagan conservative in 2012!

  • @patsfannh

    We need a conservative Congress that obeys the Constitution.

  • @McVearryAnderCalcutt You didn't mind when your fucking hero Bush ignored the constitution.

  • Yes, this "runaway national debt" you speak of really started in the mid-80s, not with Obama. It's nothing new. No one you vote for will fix it, no matter what.

  • I started mourning when the current one was elected. God help us. I hope they wake up!

  • @jkingsmill

    I bet you live in the backward south

  • Anyone believing this bunk was living in a cave while GOP Presidents from Reagan through Bush showed what "small and more caring" really meant.

  • @ofoeti Oh and the Dims hand outs and state supported everything programs are better are they? 3.7 trillion in new debt in a year and a half, unemployment at 10.2% and rising, record foreclosures, he has created no jobs, bows to our enemies. Even Cuba has abandoned their socialist model for capitalism, of sorts, in order to reduce state costs. When Chaves,and Castro joke about being further right than Obama, that's telling.

  • Oh, yes those really caring Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats. That poor BP and poor Massey Energy, those poor Koch Brothers, oh Goldman Sachs so sad, Halliburton heres another 10 bil, United Healthcare we know you need more legal protection from those nasty torts.

    What 5th tier, 99ers, who are still waiting for an Unemployment Insurance extension or a stinking JOB(a JOB that pays the bills including food, a JOB that somebody trained for, I went to college so I could work at Walmart).

  • The Republicans' plan is merely more tax cuts and deregulation. Now, if it's the RIGHT KIND of deregulation in business that stifles real growth, I'm all for it. But if it's the kind that helped contribute to this financial crisis, then hell no. And the Bush tax cuts certainly didn't seem to do much at all. The housing and asset bubble, primarily driven by the Fed's extremely low interest rates and lax policies, were a major reason for the economic boom from 2002-2007.

  • @whoo689 To say that the tax cuts stimulated the boom in any substantive way, esp. when they were SO SMALL, even compared to Reagan's, is just nonsense. How does a 3-4% tax cut on all brackets stimulate much growth? When you go from 70-28 or 25%, I can understand why some substantive growth may follow. But going from 39-35% on the top 1%? You'd be a fool to assume it'd have any real impact.

  • @whoo689 Stimulus spending DOES have some record of success in the past. Unfortunately, as empirical studies seem to suggest, for example, in FDR's New Deal, he spent too little too late. The National Recovery Administration and unionization may have contributed a small fraction to lower growth, but it certainly didn't make the depression far worse. And GDP growth during the New Deal years was actually pretty impressive. I used to believe the New Deal was a total failure, but not so anymore.

  • @whoo689 Of course, everyone will at least agree that the war spending did have a tremendous impact, esp. compared to the much-smaller New Deal spending.  Many people point to the Lost Decade of Japan as a reason stimulus doesn't work, but the overall stimulus in U.S. dollars was only about $1.4 Trillion in those 10 years. $1.4 Trillion over the next 10 years, esp. if growth kicked in, would be a VERY tiny fraction of the 2020 GDP.

  • @whoo689 Why the stimulus didn't work this time is beyond me. Some may say it didn't spend enough, and others may say it was merely handled very badly. I'm not an expert on that, although the CBO and others have confirmed that at least 2-3 million jobs have been created due to the stimulus. Unfortunately, that hasn't really led to much growth in the overall economy, and unemployment is still high.

    But the fact remains that a lot of Obama's policies simply didn't work, not hinder things.

  • @whoo689 Then again, some claim, with varying levels of evidence, that "regime uncertainty" is a key reason why employers aren't hiring. That may be true, but it's not as if Obama has tripled the rate of regulation compared to Bush. Remember, folks, Bush was no laissez-faire guy. He was a corporatist who favored HIS most-liked industries, but his executive branch STILL was heavily bureaucratic, regulatory, and he passed many big gov't bills himself.

  • @whoo689 Other than the credit card bill, the financial reform bill, and the healthcare bill, there aren't a whole lot of other HUGE or different regulations from what regulatory agencies normally handle that would make business, esp. small business, incredibly reluctant to hire. Sure, there may be cap-and-trade, but cap-and-trade DID WONDERS for combating SO2 in the 90s, and it was a very efficient cost-effective program. Why wouldn't it work now? Think, guys.

  • @whoo689 And didn't Obama's administration early in 2009 pass a bill to use $250 Billion or so to sort of bail out homeowners?? Now, if that failed, you can't say "Obama fucked it up." He's no miracle worker, but he at least tried. Besides, isn't the bitching about foreclosures coming from the same crowd that hates subprime mortgages and shit? That doesn't like homeowner bailouts? Yet you're using that as a wedge to blame Obama?

  • @whoo689 The lack of economic recovery isn't so much that Obama screwed up or actively caused things to get worse, except in a few key instances, but that he either didn't do enough, or he went after some of the wrong policies, even though his advisors told him they were the right ones. Or he misplanned those policies. But to act like Obama caused all this devastation from the get-go is absurd. Recessions aren't easy or quick to get out of. It takes time

  • @whoo689 Remember, it took at least 2-3 years to get out of the recession that Reagan inherited.

  • @whoo689 It's even more absurd to pretend like the same Republicans who helped engineer this financial crisis and drive this country into a ditch are somehow gonna magically get us out if we just elect them into the majority again. For example, where was the GOP Congress and Bush when stupid-ass Greenspan and his Fed decided to lower interest rates to near-zero levels in the early 2000s?? Why did they not see that coming? Why didn't they speak out?

  • @whoo689 But the most ridiculous thing of all is in this ad when the guy says, "our country is fading."

    FADING?? Really? I don't know if you realize it, but Obama's not all that different from Bush in the end. Do I really have to spell it out for you? If we're "fading" under Obama, then we must've been fading under Bush as well.

  • This ad and other Republican mindsets assume that everything would be A-OK if the GOP was in charge during the crisis. Or that if Obama didn't pass all his policies, we'd somehow get out of the economic ditch with lightning-fast speed. That's just unrealistic. I highly doubt it'd be much different. The current economic disaster was inevitable thanks to previous policies. There's not much the GOP would've or could've done from early 2009 to make us much better off.

  • @whoo689 I mean promotes real growth, not stifles. My bad.

  • To be fair, the recession officially started in December 2007, over a year before Obama even took office. The financial crisis started about 4 months before he took office. I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but Obama DID inherit a crisis from his predecessor. Yes, Obama's policies aren't the best, and I'm no fan of his, but to go around blaming him for ALL of the state of the economy today is silly. It's not easy to get out of a massive recession like this.

  • fuck obama. hes a fucking jihad musling fucker

  • The country is "fading" bc of 8 years of out of control spending under Bush. Obama's policies haven't had time to fail or succeed yet because he's still cleaning up the mess his predecessor left. But good luck trying to convince us otherwise.

  • @shazbot76<<<<-------PERSONA NON GRATA

    Never saw "WATERMELON MAN" (1970)

  • @shazbot76<<<----PERSONA NON GRATA

    A race mixing jiggaboo lover who made disparaging comments about a person on my YT page. A person he doesn't know and who caused him no harm.

    And I am supposed to care about his Chocolate Carter. Well fuck him Royal with a length of re-bar

  • A counterfeit President, A counterfeit Christian, Printing of 600 BILLION dollars of counterfeit money to destroy the value of our dollar. Strong alliance with the MUSLIM FAITH. 9000 page Health Care Plan that nobody read before it was passed. Welcome to the NEW WORLD ORDER.

  • 1980 all over again? We have come full circle. We need a Regan.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne That is my hope for 2012. I forget who originally said it, but when Obama first got elected someone thought he would fail but was still optimistic about it. When asked why, he simply said "It takes a Carter to get a Reagan". I have been hoping for that ever since.

  • Just like ads run against Carter in 1980 this ad is perfect.

  • Awesome ad. Obama is a failure but what did u expect from the most inexperienced pres eva

  • If change was truly wanted people would stop voting for either crime family in power. If change was truly wanted the NON VOTERS would vote 3rd party and stop all the madness from both sides. They BOTH thrive on blame the other guy or blame the other crime family. We do have more than the 2 choices even though the media wants you to think you do not.

  • I don't want to pick on Obama because he's black. But to you who voted for Obama, all I can say is WHAT THE FUCK WERE YOU THINKING???

    I mean haven't you ever gone into a black neighborhood? Even driven through one real fast?

    Didn't you notice the whole place was run down? Burnt out buildings, broken windows, graffiti all over, garbage everywhere, dogs shit in the street, winos and bums all around panhandling for "spare change".

    These are dysfunctional people. And you made one president. HELLO!

  • @The6000Sabre Racist too, huh? *palms forehead*

  • @The6000Sabre why are you here, and why are u presuming that u think like a conservative? of course u want to pick on obama because he's black, hense the rest of your racist bs dysfunction knows no skin color. three words: roosevelt (pick either) - carter - bush (pick one there, too) have you been to a trashy neigborhood in the hills, southwest, northeast, midwest? whole lotta trashy white folks. get some perpective & stop sullying the conservative brand, or get lost

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @cchashadenough,

    Conservatism is based fundamentally on individual responsibility.

    Liberalism is based primarily on collective coercion.

    When a segment of the population views themselves firstly as a member of a group, and as an individual secondly (if at all) then they are already pre primed for collectivism (socialism). It is why Democrats always pander to groups of people and never speak to, for or about the individual.

    Something to think about.

  • Rock on. The original "It's Morning in America Again" was an deniable success because it did not malign anyone, but instead spoke the simple truths of the time of the administration's success and the the simple question of why would we want to return to four years before? Yes, it's true that both parties have helped rack up the debt, and time for everyone to realize that the federal, state, and municipal governments all promise too much, and try to guarantee too much that can't done forever.

  • Comment removed

  • Truth is in the eye of the beholder. You see racism everywhere. I don't. People like you keep racism alive and kicking. You hold it close to you like a warm blanket. That is your right. We live in a free country. Someday, mabye you will let go of this hatred and enjoy the freedoms our forefathers fought for...

  • Reagan was just as much a stooge as any president. I don't care if Hollywood and history paint him to be a good president. I remember all of it, and he was a stooge.

  • @testchimp23 Shemp, you said that like a real stooge. Say hello to Moe, Larry and Curly for me, will you?

  • @The6000Sabre You must've missed the part where Reagan sold arms to Iran or you believed all the bullsh*t in the aftermath. Either way, they've turned you into a Kool-Aid drinking stooge as well.

  • @testchimp23 You must have missed the part where Obama was getting greased by Larry Sinclair. Or was it the other way around.

  • @The6000Sabre You're the one talking about Obama. I could give a sh*t about him. Of course he's crooked, they're all crooked. That's my point. Hollywood and the media have painted Reagan to look like he was a good president.

  • @testchimp23 leftist Hollywood? and the leftist media?

  • @The6000Sabre Lol!!! Why would the "left anything" turn a Republican into a hero? 

  • @testchimp23 you just answered your own question.

  • It doesn't matter who you vote for. You're all doomed, DOOMED!!!

  • but the GOP will only make it wrose...

  • @KangaKucha you mean there's a worse?

  • @The6000Sabre yes, just wait until the GOP/Tea party take over the congress, you think its bad now, just wait...

  • @KangaKucha well, I'll take my chances. How's that?

  • @The6000Sabre if you want to vote that way, go for it, I'm voting Green myself, I have had enough of both parties.

  • @KangaKucha Well if you wait a while longer Obama will get you a green job. There's mowing lawn, growing melons and that old standby, picking cotton.

  • @The6000Sabre yeah yeah, for the recond, I AM NO OBAMA FAN, he promised change, we only got pocket change, I;m never ever voting democract again.

  • @KangaKucha your on the road to seeing things clearly. The Democrats (and Republicans too) put forth the notion that they are your friend and that government is somehow here to "help you", is nonsense. POLITICIANS ARE DEFINITELY NOT YOUR FRIEND. And government is not here to help you. Government is here to CONTROL and USE YOU. And politicians are here to see that is the case.

    The sooner people begin to realize the universal truth in the words I just wrote, the better it will be for us all.

  • @The6000Sabre when its run by the coporations and the NWO, yeah goverment is bad, but fundamentaly it is a good thing but it has to be run by the civilians as a non profit organisation. there was a time when thats how it all worked.

  • Comment removed

  • @KangaKucha When was that?

  • @The6000Sabre before the 1970s...

  • smaller how? specifics please

  • wath chance

  • Nice

  • This video is on e of the facts. Every politician wants the good or shall we say the perfect purpose for his countrymen. Only thing wrong, every politician got his own perfect purpose for his own good. And every citizen got his perfect purpose but can't do anything only to vote aiming their candidate is the right choice. Endless cycle of pointing fingers. Are your candidates the solutions or another seat scratchers? We are seeing made-in-China in our store shelves and the community loves them.

  • Yeas Republicans. You thought that back of the dollar bill, I, the U.S of A., the dollar bill. and In God, We Trust was it. As You wanted that trust. I trusted you to fail.

    TEXAS. IN GOD...WE TRUST.

    & ! && JULY SEVEN 2007 I See One

  • ''Tax cuts for the richest 2% and f*ck the unemployed poor''

    - Motto of the Republican Party, 2010

  • @abelmaster I am A conservative American, not rich by anyone's standards and living payday to payday like most working Americans do...That is not my motto...I just want those people who are able to work to get off the dole and contribute to our society rather than draining it.....the democrats will never encourage that because those living off the working class are the same ones who vote them in.

  • @TwoJazzy

    1. I want people to work as well. You don't do that by giving tax cuts to the largest companies and the richest 2%, (who caused this crisis) but by stimulating the economy so that jobs are created and regulating the financial sector. US has 10% unemployment, twice as much as here in the Netherlands.

    2. I'm not a Democrat, they don't have a spine. That's one thing they could learn of Republicans. I'm a social-democrat, for social security, freedom and equality.

  • @TwoJazzy Good for you. However, I am a Communist, Socialist, Black Muslim Nazi. I'm told that is the worst kind of Nazi there is?

    Watch: /watch?v=U5Cm4NxHf7E

  • always the US with the fucking capitalism and thanks to u we have this economic problems

  • When Bush left he handed Obama the keys to his bulldozer and basically thats what were seeing in the present. A corrupt government , only now they're laughing their asses off at the little people ( 80% of America ) and find it quite amusing. They pocketed all the money and 5 to 6 digit+ bonuses and the rest get the scraps. America will never recover from this.

  • Sorry, only whites? No, look closer. Is the video mostly whites? I thought they were the majority. So, what if the video was mostly black, or hispanics.. well that wouldn't sit well with people either. BUT, who cares? Blacks overwhelmingly voted for him based on the color of his fathers skin & prospect of more handouts, and will do so every time, because they are enslaved to the handouts. "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Johann W. von Goethe

  • Dear Americans, Can u pay back the money we invested on you bonds ?

    Because I feel being scammed by Hillary clinton as she promised

    it will be safe to invest in America,but after we bought the bonds,

    you obviously devalued your dollars and keep asking us to raise the Yuan,

    so our money is shrinking in 2 direction. We earned those money very hard

    by saving and slaving our ass off 24/7 and sacrificed our environment.

    in average our people only have 250USD/month salary.. please?

    with love.

    PRC

  • :facepalm:

  • WOW.........this is awesome. And is so true. We have to vote out this administration before they ruin OUR COUNTRY!!

  • america is just getting better now. with Bush it was going down and failed

  • Comment removed

  • Why are all the people white in this advertisement?

  • @itsmegmf

    Why not?

  • @itsmegmf

    Pretty sure I saw a hispanic in there. Wait. Don't tell me it is a racist advertisement! NO BLACKS lol.

  • Remember that great quote from Reagan in 2002: "Uragh guh duh i shit myself, guh blanket..."

  • @eatenmyeyes

    How nice, being vile is the only thing you ugly libs can do.

    Why are all of you so ugly? Like a festering cancer inside and out.

  • Do away with NAFTA and any other program thats not a profit to this country. After that the only thingto do to settle the National Debt is to change the color to red or what ever of the $100.00 and $50.00 dollar bills. Give a 2 week notice to all Americans to take the money they have and turn it in for the new bills . After that time all the green stuff would be worthless. All the Drug money everywhere in the world would be worthless, along with any illegal $ in the USA

  • Do away with NAFTA and any other program thats not a profit to this country. After that the only thing the Gov. would have to do to settle the National Debt is to change the color to red or what ever of the $100.00 and $50.00 dollar bills. Give a 2 week notice to all Americans to take the money they have and turn it in for the new bills . After that time all the green stuff would be worthless. All the Drug money everywhere in the world would be worthless, along with any illegal $ in the USA

  • typical Republinazi stance.

    They sing *less gov'ment, lower taxes* but once in control.....they build more & bigger gov'ment, sure they give lower taxes....FOR THE RICH.

    Save your mindless mouthing about the Democrammunists...

    because they suck too.

    Democrat, Republican....

    don't focus on just the blue stripe or the red stripe....

    See the whole purple zebra.

    When you sheeple get sick of all this * same old same old*

    from our political machine....Vote Libertarian.

  • Why is this happening to America?

  • @Calsummersishere Because we turned away from God and thought ourselves great of our own design.

  • Vote American in November!

  • Comment removed

  • @metalboots10 Yes, you should go on, name me a current black congressman, senator or governor. The republican party has always played the race game,just ask Karl Rove about the rumor he started in the South Carolina primary. he said that John MCcain had a black child,after that he lost his lead and the primary to bush. this video is sending a definite message to it's base, blame that black guy for all your problems. Why couldn't they find any minority actors for this video?

  • Realize also that many of the problems now are the result of the populace avoiding accountability and supporting the idea of entitlement. Those who support a vast gov't replete with entitlement and nanny-state regulations are simply deifying the US gov't. They want a gov't that won't ask them to pay back student loans, or work for the welfare aid they receive; a gov't that requires nothing from them.

  • These same people don't want to hold any belief whether political, social, or religious, that will require accountability or responsibility from them. And so the rest of the populace end up paying, literally, for the sloth and indifference of those complicit in creating this vast substitution for deity, the US gov't.

  • Reagan, good on rhetoric and bad on policy.

    It's arguable that a lot of the current economic problems are can be traced back to the Reagan ideology.

    Which in not say the Dems are blameless either.

    It's a pity Obama is not able to rule by decree for a few years; maybe then he could some real good.

    And Reagan was supporter of terrorists

  • Rich conservatives hit the G-sport on populism. It's not a honest strike but is effective.

    A thinking person knows the economic conditions in our country cannot be laid at the feet of Obama, although his initiatives are the most important ones going forward to make it better.

    Blame Bush for his recklessness and policy,, and Clinton for NAFTA and dismantling financial regulatory structure.

  • @InTheAtticLights1 - If you are really interested in assign blame remember that nearly all presidential policies implemented since the inception of the US Federal Gov't required a level of cooperation across the branches of the gov't. Blame Bush, blame Clinton, Ford, Reagan, Nixon, etc, etc. The bottom line is that our elected representatives were complicit in creating the current state of affairs.

  • This ad really say's it all.

    While Obama keeps talking about IMAGINARY JOBS SAVED, the people are living the REALITY of what is going on right now.

    The people will be heard by the only WAY politicians UNDERSTAND and that's at the BALLOT BOX in November and in 2012!

    POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

  • The only reason this hasn't been called a full-on depression by the lame stream media is because they know that they are responsible for this sorry excuse for a community organizer.

  • Its about damn time someone on the right made a decent political ad. Good job. Too many RINOs running the RNC these days, afraid to cast a disparaging remark against Obama.

  • "Caring government" is an oxymoron. The goal should be smaller government that abides by the Constitution and leaves the people alone.

  • November 2 can't get here fast enough. It's time to gut the Socialists at the polls.

  • This is how the average republiklan party member sees America. All white! but there was one black person in this propaganda piece, in the background at the welfare office! but, at least they didn't forget to blame the black President for all of their wows. But I'm sure that I'm just taking all of this out of context.

    This video would make the American Bund movement very proud.

  • @theylied1776: It's funny. I am a conservative and when I saw this video, I did not count the number of black and white people in it. I did not look for the quota of hispanics, asians, or Chinese people. I just saw PEOPLE. I heard how every Child will be born with a $30,000 debt I heard how 15 million PEOPLE are out of work. 29 hundred FAMILIES will lose their homes by night fall. That is the difference. You look for racism. I listen for a message.

  • @AeroRiley No, the republicans aren't raciest! now, all you have to do to shut me up is name all the black republican congressmen, senators and governors. I'm sure there are plenty of them out there.

    How have these numbers changed since the last year bush was in office until now?I already know, I just want to see if you can be honest about it.

  • @AeroRiley amen 

  • @cchashadenough DIFFERENCE IS: There are no nice black neighborhoods. There may be a nice black family living in a racially mixed neighborhood. And there may be a trashy white family living in a decent neighborhood.

    But when it's an all black neighborhood or section, it's ALWAYS bad.

    As for Roosevelt(s) Carter and the Bush's, I have no idea what they have to do with your statement. As for the "conservative brand", stop being paranoid. You're not going to win over many blacks, no matter what.

  • Sad. The debt' s up to 43 Grand, now.

  • Sad.

  • We have got win back some measure of control if not outright control of the Congress this midterm election or Obummer's regime will unleash even more of this on the American people!

  • Comment removed

  • Can someone PLEASE caption this for the hearing impaired?!

  • Excellent.

  • plaidchuck you are wrong... and you will see... We the people are awake and the people that knew how to play the game are waking up to a new realization that the rules are changing. People like you that name call and dishonor yourselves are the past, future America is about Faith Hope Charity & Small Government ~ God Bless America.

  • Yep, and when things stay exactly the same if the nutbaggers or grand old pisspants win, you guys can go back to blaming obama or carter for all of your woes, instead of realizing you are modern day serfs under this plutocracy.

    No more democrats. No more republicans. No more hateful rhetoric.. no war but the class war. The people are tired, bruised, and battered, but never defeated.

    Tus días están contados. Nunca nos vamos por vencido. Hasta la victoria siempre.