Added: 3 years ago
From: MiloMindenbinder
Views: 35,976
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (752)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • B-2 > SAM

  • The narrator has a obvious use of the expression: " You can clearly see"

  • USAF/GOV Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel GAVE THE WORLD A BLUEPRINT OF USA TOP DEFENSE MINIATURIZED PROGRAM : YOU GUYS REALLY MESSED UP , NOW ALL THAT MONEY & RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IS WASTED,GAVE OVER TO ALL THOSE WHO WE COMPETE AGAINST, CHINA,RUSSIAN ect. AND MAKING IRAN POWERFUL IN BARGIANING POSITION TO GET TOP RADAR AND AIR DEFENSE AND FRONTLINE FIGHTERS FRO THESE NATIONS.THIS FIND GAVE 10-20YRS MINIATURIZED CLASS FOR DUMMIES OVER NIGHT (who is responsible,heads must roll ???? ))

  • wait this looks like its saying were at war with china and russia what going on here i thought we had a hey u dont attack us we wont attack u type of deal with russia when was this made?

  • USAF, made in China... defended by China... see a pattern?

  • dont belive the hype the U S has weapons we dont even know about.

    look at stelth they had that in late 70s did'nt no about it till 90s.

    there a least 15 years infront of russia and the rest of the world

  • @701shep

    and if they are hiding stuff....we cant assume what they are hidden......so by jus assuming Usa doesn bcome stronger...

  • wwohoo.....i knew the Su-30MKI is better than any USA 4.5th generation aircraft.

    btw it's jointly developed by Russia/India and is used by India :D

  • @rohitb3 the U S planes will beat russian planes with missile tecnoligy there will never be a dog fight

  • @701shep

    did u even see this vid properly?

  • You would think with all our tax dollars going towards mostly Military personel that we would have Macross like technology by now making Russia and China look like piss ants trying to train a moth. 0_o

  • Well folks looks like the world has come to and end... oh wait we still have a kick ass navy and ground forces right? Well i think the navy could kick anyone's ass alone so ya...

  • @SaphireDisc nah, don't think so...

  • indeed. us supremacy is falling behind

  • OMFG!!!!! THE RICERS ARE TAKING OVER THE WORLD!!!!! Soon everyone will be sporting Integra type R's! with giant wings on the back and loads of stickers! Were gonna fucking die!!!!

  • what i dont understand is ..if everyone goes so Stealthy..with jammers and what not...who the fk will FIGHT then!?

  • Well now it is 2011 and the F-22 raptor jet is the most superior jet fighter in my opinion. They didn't even mention precision fighting air-to-air and air-to-groud combat. All they did was jammers, missile range(which has increased greatly in the F-22 and others) and SAMs. China has the best SAMs in the world today but ours can sill keep up a fight. It will take a while for them to surpass greatly.

  • @AutomaticJP And remember the satelites and the B-2 Bombers and Nighthawk fighter

  • this video is completely asinine, they fail to even mention the F-22 and F-35 until the end of the video when they are talking about possible future threats and how theyre better than what we have now, what we have now is the best now and im sure we will roll out with the next best thing before anyone else, they also didnt mention the AIM7F/M,9X,and120A which beat out the other air to air missiles and our 4th generations now are stealth so they arent even worried about ground to air missiles

  • @codyman8818 Yeah thats what the USAF thought about the Serbs . Stealth is a bogus name given to low radar observable , a PR term used to sell the product to unknowing taxpayers at exorbent prices , maybe you ought to ask that F117 pilot hows that stealth working for ya now ! btw gusse who's military hardware they were useing, old shit on top of that ...........

  • Except that you are forgetting that the "Joint Strike Fighter" is stealth. Surface to Air Missile targeting systems are based on radar.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • this video is bullshit and full of ignorance propoganda to increase military spending, the US have the best military technology and they face no competition, the US technology is decades a head of russian or even chinese technology.

  • @Tihamah3 Even if that were true, Technology doesn't necessarily mean Strength. Which China and Russia have a better AF then USA...

  • @BusinessKi11ER seriously, the US air force is the biggest in the world in "numbers" not just technology, thats why the US can some what bully China and Russia.

  • @Tihamah3 okay you win. I just know that on a 1 on 1 fight the Russian and the Chinese planes would win. Except for Migs, Migs are a pice of shet.

  • @Tihamah3 China and Russia have the more advanced SAMS in the world, at least 20 missiles for each US plane, so no much use for that large air force, US against Russia will be like WW2,the days of the tank and men hordes will be back.

  • It does not say the USA is nr 2. at the moment... But one thing they forget is that the Backbone of the future USAF lies in F-22 and F-35 at (187 and 2443 aircraft). the plans of PAK-FA for russia is only 200 for russia and 200 for India. only 60 is aquirred as test so far. the Su-35 is only purchased at numbers around 50 - 60...

  • @JVC7400 There are only 13 flight-test F-35 built.

  • @OyvindHallvard I have not said that, i said "future".

    and there is only buildt 12 Su-35's as well. and a few prototype PAK-FA's. why did you not mention those?

  • LOL when was this made?! hahahahahaahahahahahahaha

  • so, usa dont want other countrys to defend themselves ... or at least the guys who made this video ... seems like a vid maded for the congress for getting more money in the development and buying of new aircrafts - sams systems for the USAF :P

    ha - ha - ha

    (yes im venezuelan, but i NOT support Chavez, i say this cuz u surelly gonna see that in my profile ...).

  • We have F-22 Raptors and they got fuckin Type R stickers. we aren't winning! forget it!. You can't win either!.

  • Fear is what drives the americans

  • At first the vid stunned me. then i realized that this video is old, and doesnt talk about anything the U.S. has made past the 90's. Although this was a very compelling vid, good job.

  • ehh not even dude. we should be more worried about the chinese not the russians. the russians can barley even afford alot of their technology.

  • It's everything that he doesn't say that matters. Stealth bombers that go in first and destroy enemy operations, munitions and fuel dumps, airfields, etc. The quality of the pilots in the planes is a huge factor that is conveniently not mentioned. People like this are not to be listend to.

  • Time to bing back the wild weasels

  • This video was made in about 2008 I think, good video, highly accurate.

  • thank god fare well usa i hate usa since the news of children dying to a 10s and i smile when the 11/9 happened suck usa i think they will be defeated by the arabs they trained....

  • @cvonta suck my dick motherfucker

  • Videos like this are made by weapons companies.

    They don't always have our best interests in mind.

    

  • Once it got to the most interesting part(Plasma stealth) his voice cuts off...

  • There are many many things I could say and argue to counter all this damn stupid claims on the video. But, it's the internet. And here, nobody argues like humans. So, I won't even bother.

  • Did they make this video after the f22 or something lmao

  • @AzonaCATS10 f-22 is a failure

  • @johnramboo1 lol thats the stupidest comment ive ever heard.

  • Comment removed

  • @imadamngiorlando type "truth about f-22s" on youtube this news was reported on american news channel, and i m not antiamerica.

  • @johnramboo1 sorry type " f-22 raptor exposed"

  • @johnramboo1 adjust the tin foil hat dude 

  • All that stops with a couple of modified sr-71's that drop some well placed nukes. That's air superiority.

  • @bfieldboarder We don't even fly those anymore.  The planes with real air superiority are planes you, russia, china, and i know nothing about. I trust that they exist though.

  • Comment removed

  • >Video from 2 years ago compares prototypes with American equipment from the 80's. America haters rejoice.

  • Sorry, simulations have shown the F-22 can take down 150 Sukois without losses.

  • US need to stop being arrogant and cocky! and this is coming from an US cititizen and not some fucking russian. when you bully other countries like the bush administration did and invade countries like iraq which had nonthing to do with the 9-11 attacks other countries will out of fear aggressivly modernize their military to defend aganist you! YOU CATCH MORE BEE WITH HONEY MY FRIENDS!

  • hmmm...they dont mention the F-22 or F-35.

  • America still has air superiority,

    FUCK CHINA AND RUSSIA< USAF Kicks Ass

    retard

  • Bullshit... USSR air force wasn't weaker than USAs one and there are some excellent antiair systems around since 70s

  • This is laughable. This is not an official US government video. It is foreign propaganda.

  • @airman317  yep

  • Hey someone,how old is this video any ideas?

  • @UltimateGohan2008 This video is of beginning of 2008.

  • "Russia is at the the forefront of advanced fighter technology developement"

    BULLSHIT! BULLSHIT! BULLSHIIIT!

    You know, i could prove my statement, but im not even going to bother! Thats how bullshit that statement is

  • @NiggaShutThatAss Russian air tech is not beyond USAs one, but it isn't aldo behind... id say u cant see the difference

  • Go USA go, die mutherfuckers.

  • Dont even worry the us never got rid of the nukes even after that treaty the other day and we are going to buy more raptors

  • Calm down now ironof, don't get a big dick about it

  • Right so what was the point of this video? that technology improves over time and that aircraft pushing 40 years old are bettered by aircraft that will come out in 10 years? Wow really informative stuff here.

  • Comment removed

  • @vodkasvictim Perhaps you missed the point. The video isnt scalding anyone for developing an air defense program. This video is for pursuasion purposes, meant to sway politicians into continuing to fund our Air Force. This video is fairly old and doesnt point out the lack of C3I capabilities on the part of our "potential adversaries". Assets like Cobra Ball, Rivet Joint, and AWACS are something China and Russia has seemingly failed to appreciate. Not to mention Stealth + Jamming > ADA.

  • @Icarusdecending82 China and Russia and many nations have AWACS and have for decades. SAM's have advanced so far the last 20 years due to the Iraq invasion. I would hate to be a pilot now. Old days just sent a cruise missile to take out SAM's but SAM's can shot them as easy as stealth planes.

  • @6630mcdo Its true they have but they arent as capable as the E3B/C. The Mainstay (Russian AWACS) has a design flaw that doesn't allow the radar to see aft of the aircraft (because of the high wing tail). The engines also don't produce the wattage that the Sentry's do. You'd like to think our stealth aircraft are easily destroyed but you don't take into account our electronic attack capabilities (jamming and ARM's) also the fixed radar sites would be targeted by SLCM's.

  • @Icarusdecending82 Most Russian missiles have anti-jamming systems. There's always a chance for the AA system to fail, but stealth planes and even anti-radar missiles have a range of 60km. SAM has a 400km range and connected to all radars. missiles can go 3-12 mach. US is still stronger. Russia is getting stronger fast.

  • @6630mcdo I have always admired Russian military hardware, especially their small arms. The MiG21 remains one of my favorite military aircraft ever produced.

  • @6630mcdo I subscribe to the belief that the real conflict between China and the US will be economic, not one of arms...thankfully.

  • @vodkasvictim you missed the whole point you idiot.. They are not saying they cant protect theirselves and build better weapons, they are simply saying that the rest of the world is catching up with technolegy. Way to try and interpret it to make America look bad you fucking loser..

  • And this why i hate the F35 because it only has ONE attack ability.

  • Wow. Very constructive.

  • Fuck Russia, there in a state right now where all there doing is rebuilding all there old fleet and selling it to other country. The most advance jet they make can not be used by them cause it's to expensive and so with other weaponry. Instead they sell it to growing country (look it up)

  • Whom are they selling the PAK-FA to?

  • it mention idiot-)

  • This video is ridiculous. They don't even mention the F-22 and the F-35..

  • Maybe you should watch the entire video.

  • this video is crap. it has been made to show how much important for USA the production of new generation fighters.

    this video is supposed to explain taxpayers the vital necessity of new generation weapon production for their own safety and help them to pay bloody money.

    bullshit.

  • where is Russia going to get the money to build more jets ?

  • Did you forgot that Russia as of today is the largest producer of crude oil and natural gas in the world?

  • i don't think i herd that maybe that's why i didn't know

  • Oil, gas and an annual economic growth of 5 -7 %

  • Russia almost has not national dept.

    US has terrible huge national dept

  • Can this video be considered legitimate for the provide facts and analysis?

  • It has been made by U.S. AFA (Air Force Association) ..pratically the most important USA Aviation istitution (excluded USAF itself ,of course ). It has been maked on the basis of 6 different surveys (4 american and 2 european ) on the those specific air defence fields. Judge you if it can considered legitimate to provide facts and analysis...

  • Ok cool, I didnt what the source was, sounds legitimate

  • maked at Nellis base!!! and those,instead maked at Mountain home have seen the SU-30 MKI win systematically on F-15 (like the combat outcome of ANY computational model at world,USA included,had already vastly foreseen).Ah and those mistakes are not marginal !! Sustaining which an SU-30 MKI has a Tumansky engine and in TVC has a sustained turn of 20-23 degrees/sec and which a Mig 21 Bison has an Elta -60 radar are IMMENSE IDIOCYS !!! Probably even an amateur know the subject better than it !!

  • "so getting some of the periphery info wrong makes the entire briefing incorrect"

    Ah Ah..... This is NOT A BRIEFING !!! I know it is sad but is the REALITY. I Know ,i know ...you have cited it hunfred of times (believing to have cited an authorative serious debriefing...probably you don't had looked at 9:06-9:40.... by a USAF Col INVOLVED in the exercitation) and now you discover which,it is a clown talking in front nof an auditory of old pilots,which NO one vs one engagements atALL was

  • "MaggotBrain" - so this is not a briefing - lol, lol - so a colonel standing in a lecture hall behind a briefing stand, using the briefing stand giving a briefing of 'red flag 2008' events to other retired pilots and you say its not a briefing - lol, lol. i've been to many briefing which are far less grand than this with equally enthusiastic SME's.

  • "but the point he was making at 4:50 onwards was about the jamming feature" Ah Ah you have also SERIOUS hearing problems. From 4:50 to 4:53, ok ? I am curious to know what you will invent... I image which if USAF would have accepted the "challenge" to disclose at public the ACMI records of the engagements you would negate even the most clear of evidence ..Ah Ah

  • "MaggotBrain" - i've now said repeatedly he was wrong about the radar - can you really not read english or just have some mental problem we should all know about. but the colonel is not wrong about the Israel jammer, which he discusses in much further detail. do you understand or do you need more time to re-read this again. evidence - lol, lol.

  • dribbling ? ah ah i talk with a person which until few minutes ago believe which a pathetic inventor in uniform,not directly linked at the exerxice operations, which has COMPLETELY OVERTURNED the real outcome of RED FLAG 2008 !!! and which has demonstrated an astounding ignorance of DECISIVE TECHNICAL elements of platforms involved (the engine of SUKHOI-30 MKI and the radar of MIG-21 Bison) was in reality a serious official which was making a detailed debriefing in front of the pilots !!! Ah Ah

  • "MaggotBrain" - lol, lol, completely overturned - lol, lol, no, really did you say that - lol, lol. so getting some of the periphery info wrong makes the entire briefing incorrect - maybe to the insanely stupid - but not to the rest of us. as i have said to others, you can believe his statements or not, i find them more believeable from the evidence i have found. but you go ahead and ignore everything else - just because you can not find it - lol, lol.

  • YOU ARE without any SHAME !! Ah Ah I have gived the PRECISE REFERENCE to RELIABLE SOURCES, and also now you have attempted to defend a clear INCOMPETENT ,and not in my opinion, but from VERIFIABLE FACTS , from precise notes maked on its statements ,CHANGING THE SUBJECT from the radar (the element mentioned) to the jammer (absolutely unmentioned). That tactic can work with another but NOT with me...clear?

  • "MaggotBrain" - if you could do any basic research, you too would find such sources - i am not going to do your research for you. changing the subject - i've already said he got it wrong for the Mig-21-93 - can you not read - but the point he was making at 4:50 onwards was about the jamming feature, he carries on for almost a hurry minute about that feature. when does he mention about the radar again in such detail? you really need to do better.

  • "MaggotBrain" - verifiable FACTS - lol, lol - do me a favour - lol, lol. if you seriously can not do such basic research - admit it and give up - i know school kids who can at least do basic searchs for info to find facts from text given them. if you seriously not up to it, say so.

  • "MaggotBrain" - the SU-30MKI engine are the AL-31F. the IAF still stated their are serious recurring problems with the SU-30MKI, possibly due to the high rate of failures in that engine (India Express 2003) from FOD, where india was reported to refuse a batch of SU-30MKI's. each engine instead of having the 700 hours flying times, only had an avg of 300 hours. again the colonel clearly states this as an issue.

  • simrobin at the contrary of you i don't need ANY offence (MaggotBrain.. ah ah) to offend you i need only FACTS.

    "the 125 * Mig-21's were upgraded for the IAF,LEAVING THE RUSSIA RADAR ONBOARD but with Israeli / French HUDs and other avionics, using Israeli Jammers -WHICH IS WHAT HE SAID."

    ABSOLUTELY FALSE !!! Please hear at 4:50 of the integrale video here on You Tube !!. It simply has pushed (like a lot of people among the USA military "fan boy") on a well knowed platitude to subliminally

  • "MaggotBrain" - that India has upgraded their Mig-21's is a matter of FACT - as to it having an Israeli radar i dont know, as the Mig-21-2000 does have an israeli radar - but i dont think India has any of these, just the Mig-21-93. so he made a minor mistake about the radar, but was correct about the jammers (4:58). - you need to listen a little better.

  • (the majority of which ignore completely the development of "Fornof briefing" story and still now believe which USAF at Red Flag 2008 has dominated in engagements against IAF SU-30 MKI !!! Ah Ah Ah,absurd but true ..) causing an enormous image's damage. Simrobin i leave you with a video with the direct declarations (uncontested by USAF...) of some of Indian official / pilots involved : COZYu7LGLBQ Good vision.... Simrobin

  • "MaggotBrain" - though this colonel may have got some of his inform not quite right, its not totally incorrect. the 125 * Mig-21's were upgraded for the IAF, leaving the Russia radar onboard but with Israeli / French HUDs and other avionics, using Israeli Jammers - which is what he said.

  • downplay russian role in the good performances showed by MIG-21. The idea is more or less that: "Russian aerodynamics design is no so bad (...but in reality majority,deeply consider them astoundings !!) but theirs avionics are at stone age ( a platitude generated by the surpass maked by west with Gallium Arsenide semiconductor technology at the deriving AESA radar...the reality is which before that west has always chased soviet in radar technology !!). Sayng which MIG-21 radar is Israeli made

  • "MaggotBrain" - its called research - i know you have problems with this - the Mig-21-2000 - so carry on with the copy and paste from the web.

  • it launch a subliminal "reassuring" message to the auditory:" Don't worry those aircraft have well performed because had the jammer and radar of our friend Israel...without our technology they are lost" Ah Ah simrobin,leaving also a part its evident, verifiable,incompetence hear the words it use,the way in which gesticulate it is a true stain of dishonour for the uniform it wear !! Don't surprise me which a similar guy ,in a situation where it believe to can say anithing without any risk of

  • "MaggotBrain" - so why do the Indian's call the Mig-21 the 'flying coffin'. its reported 500 Mig-21's have now crashed since they came into service, 330 of them from the IAF. the article goes onto mention since 1970 to now, the IAF have crashed almost 700 planes, mostly Russian made planes. the report then mentions that F15 / 16's have a crash rate of 3-4 per 100000 flight hours. the report cites the indian Times for much of this information - very interesting.

  • "MaggotBrain" - 'subliminal reassuring' - lol, lol - i take it your talking about yourself - lol, lol. but you try to do your research - if i can find it from multiple sources, over time and with help from others, you might catch up - lol, lol. 'Subliminal reassuring' - lol, lol and that from YOU - lol, lol.

  • to be disowned ,has changed the unmpteenth humiliation in a row caused by a russian made aircraft,in a triumph which boost the morale of those old pilots...it has been simply unluck because now ANYBODY at world can say hear at 4:50 ...it is absourdely incompetent .Simrobin, Pushpindar Singh has talked of the GROSS mistake on RADAR of MIG 21,not on jammer. Make research ? Ah Ah It is MY WORK !!! And in a field hundreds of time more complex than that...Retry,you will be more lucky,...maybe ah ah

  • "MaggotBrain" - if what you say is true about you doing research - your not very good at it - as i said he got the radar part wrong, but not the part or the importance of the jammer feature. the fact that even India state the jammers come from Israel and the supporting avionic, leaving the Russian radar intact. but you can not even do this simple level of research - why is that??

  • "MaggotBrain" - but of course you're now going to tell us again about your research role again - lol, lol - as though it actually means anything to anyone apart from you - lol, lol - you certainly wouldn't make my staff - but please bragg some more - its interesting to hear the dribbling's of the inept like you - lol, lol.

  • "kishanbailey" - again you choose to believe that, and the informed believe otherwise. if this was dirty tricks, it would have been far dirtier, in fact the US were embarrassed by his comments which were not ment for public viewing, because it offended a potential future huge customer - India plans to spend $100 billion over the next 5-10 years on defence.

  • Coming to Mig-29s, India operates close to 70 and all of them are operational.

    About your Red Flag 2008 misinformation, the Indian contingent didnt have a single Mig-29 in them. I dont know where you or your news source could spot one!

  • About the Red Flag post-mortem, only one red faced Colonel went on with his cowboy antics while the official USAF stand was that this was the Colonels own personal views. The Indians chose to shut their mouths and not engage in a verbal duel with no end or a meaning to it.

    All these comments are towards Mr Sombrin, of course.

  • "Kishanbailey" - i dont believe i said India took Mig-29's to 'Red Flag', just SU-30's, MIg-21's and a number of support a/c. you chose not to believe this Colonel respond for much of 'Red Flag' - thats you right, i choose to believe him. Colonels dont tend to lie in briefings to others - you tend to get dismissed from you rank for such offensess.

  • Who says that the "respectful" Colonel lied? He only covered up dirty tracks, a talent which every administration encourages their subordinates to perform.

  • "Colonels dont tend to lie in briefings to others " Simrobin ,you have a little problem.......the video DON't WAS a BRIEFING !!!!!! Ah Ah Ah. It was a PRIVATE encounter with the " Daedalians" a groups of RETIRED pilots !!! Ah Ah Ah . It has simply maked a thing which each person workimg in competitive field( and,in this case,in front of an auditory of patriotic and nostalgic fans of USAF, who clearly don't knowed nothing of what was happened really in the exercice..)...it has LIED . Naturally

  • "MaggotBrain" - so the words 'private briefing to the 'Daedalians'' is not a briefing - so what constitutes a briefing - FOOL. so the current Director of the Requirements and Tesing Office at the USAF would, as you put it, 'know nothing about what happened at the exercise', so what do think this ex-pilot, now director of an office which captures requirements and tests solutions would do - FOOL - a wargame exercise.

  • is veryfiable by ANYONE). SImrobin if you would record the PRIVATE statements of ANY military insider( from a freshman to a general) maked in front of an auditory of person EMOTIONALLY attached to the thing and which don't knowed what was happened and imaginig its words would remain confined among the 4 walls od the chamber, you would hear the GREATER NO SENSES of human history. Probably in a similar situation a french colonel recordede would have claimed in front of ex french pilots:" We have

  • dominated american and indian Air Forces, F-15 ? ah ah an useless big plane ,i have personally tailed one at 6 o'clock for 9 minutes only for fun ..etc..etc.." . Naturally if similar invention go on internet ,after the initial "cloud of dust" the TRUTH resurface and a COL. of USAF become quickly renemed "You Tube Terry" Ah Ah (I image you know perfectly which ,by now,it is renowed for that "title" ). But now we must pass to the informed "counteroffensive" which has reduced this USAF colonel,

  • at "laughing stock" of half of wordly military environment. The first has been Vishnu Som, an Associate Editor and Senior Anchor at NDTV (the first Indian 24hours new network) and one of the few jornalists accredited and present at Red Flag 2008 and with COMPLETE ACCESS to ACMI records. You can see its service here: video . google . com /videoplay?docid=-705642758122­432671 (see it,it is very well done) . After having looked at Col. Fornof's video,it simply don't believed to its eyes .

  • Knowing the REAL outcomes of the engagements it has quickly prepared an article publied on major indian newspapers and has intervened also in some sites for debunk the ridicle statements of Col.Fornof. You can read an example here ,but litterally hundreds of others are present on internet) livefist . blogspot . com /2008 /11 /livefist-column-vishnu-som-fi­rst-hand . htm . At that has echoed the intervention of the Vayu Aerospace Review editor Pushpindar Singh ,which has maked even more

  • It has changelled Col. Fornof at allow the ACMI records to be divulged and at do that for the first time ,IN FRONT OF MEDIA TELEVISION CAMERA with the immediate recording of comments on the EMERGENCES and undebatable FACTS immediately envoyed on internet !! You can read one of its intervention at flightglobal here: w w w . flightglobal . com /blogs /the-dewline /2008 /11 /a-final-word-from-india-on-yo­u . html . After that, USAF command has maked its apologies to IAF and

  • this last has considered the "unplesant incident" closed,also for mantain a friendly climate of cooperation with USAF (in any case the greater airforce at world). Little Personal Note: USAF would have ZERO problem at win one vs one engagement with SU-30 MKI using its best air superiority fighter : F-22. Any insider at world ,conversely,know perfectly which an F-15 is simply a no-match for a SU-30 MKI BVR and WVR (you can see up just this video maked by USA experts on that....). No even one

  • expert,analyst or pilot at world had gived credits to Fornof's claims, all knowed perfectly the parametrical reality of the comparison and probably "You Tube Terry" has managed also to wring some smiles in the military rooms( is always fun to see a colonel who,thinking of talking safely in private, shoot ,like a machine gun,one idiocy after the other for impress the auditory.. ah ah ah),the problem has been only which that "performance" has been spreaded by the enormous tribe of "hooligan fans"

  • "MaggotBrain" - but you believe he is lying, lol, lol, well that might be true in Italy but still in our professional militaries its known as 'conduct unfitting an officer', especially a Director in the USAF - FOOL. nice try - but a failure as usual for you - FOOL.

  • it don't imagined which the amateur video recorded by the enthusiastics "Daedalians" would be putted on Internet . It has maked one of GREATER POOR SHOWING OF MILITARY HISTORY !!! First it has stated true IDIOCYS :like the SU-30 MKI which have Tumansky engines whene even stones know which them have NPO Saturn AL-31 !!! ah ah (control yourself),or which Mig-21"bison" had israeli made radar !! ah ah when even the most ignorant of amateur know which it has russian made one(and also that is

  • "Kishanbailey" - i heard india grounded its Mig-29's shortly after Russia grounded its entire fleet - had not heard if they had started using them again. after what came out from the Russian inspections, a large number unfit to fly and are being retired.

  • [Sombrin] Then all I can say is that you or your source heard them "Wrong".

  • "kishanbailey" - i repeat - i did not say Indian used Mig-29's at 'Red Flag' in 2008. you do need to read my comments...

  • India has been procuring Su-30s since 1996. The first batch of 40-50 was broken into sub-batches of 10 each and was mainly the Su-27UB trainers with no canards or thrust vectoring. Subsequently all of them have been converted into Su-30MKIs. It was decided that a total of 190 Su-30MKIs would be built by HAL at an average of 10/year. In 2004, it was decided that the average would have to be increased to 20 so as to complete by 2014 or 16 latest. That would leave India with 240 units.

  • "Kishanbailey" - i hear now Russia is buying Indian made parts for its SU-30/35 fleet, as they can make then quicker and from recent events, more reliably. i also hear western a/c manufacturers are very high on Indian's wish list for its future combat a/c, especially on its weapon systems. that could be why the MIG-35 uses a NATO standard bus.

  • India prefers Russian airframes and engines to the Western counterparts but western (predominantly French) and Israeli avionics installed on them.

  • "kishanbailey" - really, so when Boeing pulled out of the attack helo bid for the Indian Helo programme, India cancels the progeamme and then re-starts it asking Boeing to come back - interesting. for the first time, india asks the west to bid for its future offensive combat a/c programmes, instead of always having Russian - do you see a trend here??

  • "kishanbailey" - So india prefers western French designs, so asking France to leave its largest future offensive jet programme, making France re-sub an updated design. from comments made by senior IAF, the west is becoming the prefered option. in fact, India has approach both the UK/France for its next a/c carrier, after the 8 year refit of a smaller Russia a/c carrier and its truely massive overspend.

  • "Kishanbailey" - interesting facts on the SU-30MKI. but still the reports which have come from the IAF stated 'serious and recurring' issues with the SU-30's which came from Russia, hence grounding the fleet - its just very unfortunate that a further 2 * SU-27's crashed recently in Russia.

  • This is funny ,America has stealth,..

    No one else does...........

    Their are 2 kind of aircraft,targets and Stealth..

    Which would you want to be..?????

  • If stealth is such a big factor Germany would have won Word War with its U- Boats( True Stealthy Wartoy)

  • Big difference between naval stealth and aerial stealth.

  • America and the UK learned how to track them........

    The U boat was by far Germany's most affective weapon.......

  • you are a bunch of stupid idiots, outside america europa live out the future world power !!!!! Brazil

  • U american arrogants think that u r the best but everone outside the US knows that russia has the most powerful air fleet in the world. Even your fighters are not a match for Irans fighters.

  • "c000lb000y" - lol, lol, you say the most stupid things. did you know the entire Russian SU-24 fleet is grounded as 2 have crashed, the entire Mig-29 Fleet grounded, the India SU-35's grounded and now its reported 3 of the 6 Russian combat jets shot down in the Georgian conflict, where by Russia ground forces and one of jets was a strategic Bomber.

    so come on, tell us some more of you stupid comments, or accept the FACTS. we're waiting with interest, lol, lol.

  • "simrobin" lol at you in case you dont know "India does not operate SU-35's" do some research and then comment!!

  • "lmsballer15" - your correct, they have the SU-30MKI. a mistake.- do you admit your mistakes so readily?

    but still these Russian made SU-30MKI's are grounded, due to serious recurring problems, with a near crash and an actual crash.

  • crashes and accidents happen, even to F-22's, F-15's et al.

    no offense but try to be objective and stay on topic with the video

  • "saintkatanalegacy" - yes a/c crash and have problems, but not from the sort of problems being reported by users of Russia equipment. Algeria returned all their Mig-29's, as unfit for purpose and India, a once constantly purchaser of Russia jets, has now decided to ask the west to bid for the first time, to the annoyance of Russia. just look at the refitted russia a/c carrier indoa has paid over the top for, started in 2004 to be delivered in 2012 - FOR A REFIT.

  • delays happen even for F-35's. as for India, it has its right to open up a bidding being a neutral nation. Besides, they already have a wide variety of imported arsenal from various arms exporting nations. As for a refitted ship, it all boils down to costs. It would save them more money refitting an existing hull with modernized equipment than a fresh one. come to think of it, those are damn expensive investments for a country whose enemy is just next door.

  • "saintkatanalegacy" - the delay to the F35 is rumoured to be a weight issue, plus another rumour, equipment upgrades with new capabilities. yes, india has the right to chose who supplies its future offensive a/c. recently HAL, india's a/c manu working with Russia on the PAK-FA, has questioned the value of the arrangement as Russia has still not shared its tech despite India paying for a great deal of the party. many believe thats why india is looking to the west for its toys.

  • "saintkatanalegacy" - as to the percentage of F22's in active service, you could be correct but its not from any underlying technical problems. the training of pilots is far more intensive than for other jets and acceptance of each a/c takes longer. but thats not to say issues have not been found from systems failures.

  • well, actually they do(like any other plane). like any other software, it is subject to bugs and glitches and flight control systems are no exception.

    i do not mean to detract any plane what so ever, being an aviation enthusiast, but these things happen so that accidents are less likely to happen. ofc, you may have heard about the F-22 crash just this year.

    just given the amount of maintenance hours devoted on the F-22 gives people reason to speculate.

  • "saintkatanalegacy" - only a complete fool would right off Russian equip, but its not in most cases as good as every one would have us all believe. in some areas they have or had the edge, but have not kept up with their tech or industrial base. if you've not heard both the UK and US have already started trials on their new 6th gen a/c, with the US stating an in service date of 2018. so i would never right off the US off from achieving this

  • ah, that would be the F/A-XX as a replacement for the F/A-18. interesting enough, they had to compete a single seater of each firm against a UCAV version of the same air frame.

    well, the purpose of most russian equipments are often overlooked as their emphasis on practicality is quite high. well, ofc they may not have the same level of electronics as its western counterpart but the engineering aspect is quite superior. like how AMRAAM is compared to R-27 and AIM-9X to the R-77.