RON PAUL IS GOING TO BE PROSECUTED BY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO CALL AMERICAN PEOPLE INVADERS AND INITIATORS OF WARS.
RON PAUL SAID THE USA INVADES COUNTRIES AND STARTS WARS, WHICH GIVES USA A BAD REPUTATION AROUND THE WORLD , THEREFORE IT IS CONSIDERED A CRIME . A US CITIZEN WHO
WAS BORN IN USA CANT GO AGAINST GOVERNMENT POLICIES WHICH MIGHT TREATEN THE FUTURE
As for the environmental problems, Ron Paul wanting to legalize gold and silver as legal tender, would probably do more than any other policy anyone could ever dream of. This would probably in a manner of years even out prices a great deal between China and USA, and therefore stop the shipping of goods around the globe that can perfectly well be made locally.
You know, Ron Paul can really stick it to the other candidates when he has to...the whole 'McCain is a maverick because he colludes with the liberals' comment...bulls-eye. Ron Paul=true maverick. RON PAUL 2012!
BTW, not a direct quote above, just what my ears heard between the lines.
RON PAUL IS GOING TO BE PROSECUTED BY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO CALL AMERICAN PEOPLE INVADERS AND INITIATERS OF WARS.
RON PAUL SAID THE USA INVADES COUNTRIES AND STARTS WARS, WHICH GIVES USA A BAD REPUTATION AROUND THE WORLD , THEREFORE IT IS CONSIDERED A CRIME . A US CITIZEN WHO
WAS BORN IN USA CANT GO AGAINST GOVERNMENT POLICIES WHICH MIGHT TREATEN THE FUTURE
I like his integrity. He's talking sense. Anyone can see the US has extended its reach beyond its resources. Look at what happens at home when there are no win situations being propped up overseas. Remember Vietnam. Our soldiers are being killed & injured there in an unwinable war. Just like Vietnam. Bring them home & show more respect for lives & taxpayer money. Keep telling us the truth. Please elect Ron Paul for President & save the US from implosion, the rumour machine and financial ruin.
that's what i like about ron paul, he speaks his mind even when it's unpopular. all of the other candidates just say what they think will be popular, and change their opinions at the drop of a dime
If you believe in race, you are a racist. Race was created by elitist Europeans to divide the poor, create conditions for slavery so the people would be too busy looking at each other than the politicians and bankers who bleed them dry. If there is any hope for the USA, race most become obsolete and never used. ...if not, you'll fall right back in the same hole. ...or maybe cause another civil war. Race is not science, it's a lie.
RON PAUL is MY teacher MY leader the only person I gave permission to lead on my behaf. I recognize no ruler like so many do. You are allowed to ask others to lead for you but you can NOT impose a ruler on someone else, that would be slavery I am no slave.
In Canada, I am being psycholgically, sexually, emotionally, financially, socially tortured and bullied for last 2 years, openly for the crime of using my civil right of not speaking with Toronto police. Based on their unsubstantiated self serving theories they put me under 24 hrs video surveillance, they openly go around instigating hatred, slandering my name at my employment and I am being tortured everywhere i go, including at work, openly with management involved. Canada is not a democracy.
i have nothing to snitch about. Can you believe, the police has hired Tantrics to get me killed. I neeti if end up dead, it is malicious police work involving vudo and black magic etc.
You dont udnerstand that regulation has to be done by the market and not by beauractrats who get in bed with special business.. We had all the regulations in the world but we couldn't madoff who made deals with the regulators.. remember he predicted all the economic trouble we would be in yearsgo before they happened.. if Anyone has credibility on economic issues it's him.
Our world is hostage to the insatiable rampaging of the ruling class private gain and greed, dominating,dehumanising,devaluing everyone and everything in the midst. We can and must change the wage slavery of immense humanity in a market system of artificial scarcity . We can share the world for our common needs and well being in harmony within and without.
He's full of shit. No one has ever bought, or insured a nuclear power plant with it's own money; nuclear power has always required government intervention, which is why Japan and France (quite interventionist) have more nuke power than England.
It's a very nice sentiment to say Ron Paul 2012 but we still have electronic voting machines in most of the states ... I don't think anything will change in the 2012 election even if by a miracle Ron Paul got elected. The machine has way too much control now ... more than in any time in history.
Watch for the upcoming PBS Frontlne Doc 'Top Secret America'. The NSA now wants you to know that they have total control & that their taking the kid gloves off and unzipping their pants. It's too late
thats why there is a problem with american voters. usa voters are more concerned abut weather a leader can sell rather than listen to the actual platform being introduced....
@61talya Nah I wouldn't pander to people who need flashy lights and asthetic bells and whistles. If he gets his point across then so what. Maybe he doesn't care about manipulating your feelings?
@Theyallfloatdownhere I just feel like majority of the people who voted for Obama were very much 'smitten' by his charisma and his personality. He delivered his speeches with a very statesmen' like persona and Americans judge by appearance and personality first.....and then policies last, no matter what the history of that particular person maybe....Ron Paul is also a much older man then Obama and I think that works against him. Paul would have been a great leader.
Nuclear is only cheap because of how much money was put into it, however the current technology leaves a pool of radioactive waste that lasts for millions of years, well beyond the lifespan of any concrete containment housing. If nuclear is to be pursued we need to hassen the developement of pebble bed nuclear reactors, where the uranium or thorium is inside of a radiation indestructable graphite ball which lasts for 500 millions years or so.
Ron Paul makes total sense. The Republican Party is, for the most part, a theocratic, anti-freedom party. James Dobson even gets to vet their candidates, much the way the mullahs of Iran vet their candidates for "free" elections. The Democrats are simply liberal, in the European model, which works but could be much improved on. Libertarians and thinking liberals who understand freedom and recognize that the empire is doomed need to work together and create a new party.
@20324758. The US was designed with separation of powers to prevent a President being able to do whatever he/she likes. Sure, he could probably fix the foreign policy crisis, but he needs to do more than just veto stuff that Congress sends him. He needs the support of Congress, which he wouldn't have. Instead, people should focus on getting as many non-bought candidates like Ron Paul and Ralph Nader into the Congress. Once that happens, you can move onto the Presidency.
@SirPwn4lot There were alot of us worldwide, who were hoping so much for Obama to finally change the US. After all, that's what he said he would do. Two years later, he has done nothing, really... Nothing essential, anyway. Nothing to change the fundamental workings of the system. He could've stabilised the US as a modern mixed-economy welfare state with his first two years, but he didn't.
@20324758 He seems the only one who's up to challenge the establishment. I'd prefer Bernie Sanders, though... They should form an alliance and take the best parts from both.
I like Ron Paul but the reason he choked on the question of what to do about Coal is that Texas is the 4th largest producer of Coal in the US. So even though he is the most honest Republican out there he still is unwilling to confront Big Coal about pollution although he did present a solution to and I am sure is willing to endorse Wind and Solar also. I do not think Nuclear is the answer it is NOT clean, you have waste with Nuclear Power.
Put more succinctly, there is no absolute "good" or "evil" where politics is involved - except in extreme cases like Nazism and Soviet communism - everything revolves around self-interest. Heck, even the black civil rights campaigners in the 1960s were "self-interested" individuals, caring more for their own rights than for those of other disenfranchised individuals;are they better or worse than the super-rich oil bastards?
(Oops, I may have answered my own question there.)
I don't think W Bush was that ignorant. Bill Clinton's view of him, was he wasn't qualified to be elected to the office.
Iraq was planned in 2001, this was from the price of loyalty book. I originally read this from the last oil shock, check that website lastoilshock
We live in the time of energy resource competition, if any country decides to compete against America and Britain using force, we all lose. Moore didn't even touch the subject of oil decline
The only thing anyone can say with certainty is that politics is a dirty business, more so perhaps in the 20th/21st century than in any other era before. WWII was not a straightforward black-and-white affair, but there were at least some moral boundaries; the Cold War was all about ideology, the US propping up ugly fascist regimes around the world in order to support its own interests; now the world revolves around oil money. Rules have changed, but the game itself is pretty much the same. .
there's one aspect where i think Paul is definitely right. the government takes in more than enough money, it's just spent stupidly. but I've never heard him talk about health care. I don't think he'd be for universal health care though, so i don't think he'd have a real good shot at winning. i can never understand how these supposed christians are so selfish, and it's always godless lefty's who have to beg and plead to help poor people get anything.
He is not for universal healthcare, but as a physician, he would not be against government funding if it were the only way to provide poor people with medical care.
i hope so, cause too often people try to make medicair, medicaid, social security type stuff seem like government handouts that they just made up with no demand for them. people demanded it and a lot needed it. I have no clue if we could provide everyone with good health care with just the market though. my gut leads me to think no though.
Ron Paul thinks that everyone should get medical care, but he does not advocate the political solution that would solve the problem, but it is different from his party view that people should not get medical care unless they pay for it.
One thing I disagree with Paul on is the healthcare issue, or at least, I don't quite understand how his idea of healthcare reform will help everyone. Perhaps I'm missing someting. But I'm a die-hard liberal, and I have to say, Paul was the most level-headed, realistic and what appeared to be the most honest Presidential candidate running. I only regret not knowing, back in Nov of 2008, about him what I know now. I would have voted for him.
Finally! It's frereshing to see a political candidate that hasn't jumped on the 'green' wagon and still open to debating the fact that it might not be us causing 'Climate Change' if it is happening at all!
This is the kind of guy that should be in power; someone who concentrates on the real issues and doesn't try to tax us for a non-existant cause. Dead on with the nuclear power, if AGW was a problem then it comes at no cost to us to switch over our power plants to nuclear.
If Ron Paul continue his crusade and gain more popularity, it's only a matter of time before the shadow government assassinate him. Just like the kill Lincoln and Kennedy.
Only if they decide he's a threat. Let's face it, most Americans aren't very politically astute. They elected Bush, and he had all the charisma and political know-how of a chimpanzee; they elected Barack Obama, who is charismatic but clearly not as experienced or as capable a political as Ron Paul; the overriding rule in US politics seems to be "it's not *what* you know, it's *who* you know." The American people have dug their own grave, as far as I'm concerned.
I think you got that the wrong way round, Bush WAS elected the second time, it was the first time he rigged the election. That's what's so baffling. There are pieces of lemon peel floating through Manhattan that would make a better President than him, there are monkeys in African forests as yet unexplored that have a better grasp of the English language than that tree-swingin' ape. Bush may not be a tyrant - leave that to Cheney - but if anything he was an incompetent buffoon.
Bush was a puppet, the ones pulling the strings were Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. And goodness knows who else. The oligarchs on Wall Street, the oil financiers in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East, the Bin Ladens - we know the Bush family and the Bin Ladens had a close relationship, and the Saudis are estimated to have around a trillion dollars invested in the US economy. (That's a whole lotta cash - see Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 if you don't believe me.)
I don't think George Bush is/was a genuinely "bad" person, and perhaps I was a little scathing in my description of him before, but he was a fool, and cleverly manipulated by those around him. Kind of a Cladius/Emperor Nero of the 21st century. Time will tell. Possibly he even believes in American liberties and the rule of law, but he doesn't done much to uphold them. That's the problem with someone who believes he is doing the right thing, and won't be told otherwise, when clearly he's not.
this guy is way ahead of his time, i like obama but i feel he may be more show than go, obamas connection to the rockefella's only consolidates my suspitions. another opportunity lost for real change cld be the outcome.
well, we are a hybrid of democracy and a republic. we have a constitution. we vote for leaders to go to congress and speak for us. and we vote for state propositions
"and to the republic for which it stands" america was founded as a constitutional republic not a democracy. ben franklin said it best; "democracy is where you have 51% controlling the other 49%". our freedoms are protected by the constitution which is slowly being revoked by things like the P.a.t.r.i.o.t. act which is actually an acronoym that explains exactly what it does. find out for your self.
"and to the republic for which it stands" america was founded as a constitutional republic not a democracy. ben franklin said it best; "democracy is where you have 51% controlling the other 49%". our freedoms are protected by the constitution which is slowly being revoked by things like the P.a.t.r.i.o.t. act which is actually an acronoym that explains exactly what it does. find out for your self.
@SoldierCyfix With the Patriot Act, Americans' secrets are a little harder to hide. The only people who fear it are the guilty. No tanks are rolling down the streets, soldiers don't patrol outside your home. Overall, there have been no big bad repercussions as a result of it. The Patriot Act was legally recognized by congress, and followed every constitutional restriction. Then again, trying to find something coherent on youtube is like trying to get 4chan to make sense. I don't blame you.
@Yeahcoolwhatever No its a means to corrupt and control our system and us get it straight. Heck I got in a fight at school in 8th grade for being bullied and on the fine there was a charge that read before it "no child left behind" hahaha fuck you little sheeple they want to make money off of you they don't even care about the kids. Why you?
@Theyallfloatdownhere corrupt and control our system? The Patriot Act's only aim is to watch and listen, not to control anything other than terrorism. It does control that system, and I can't imagine you want terrorism to remain uncontrolled.
And what does you getting in a fight in school have to do with no child left behind; and what does no child left behind have to do with the Patriot Act? Organize your thoughts.
@Yeahcoolwhatever Oh yeah im the stupid one. I plainly said what you said back to me what DOES it have to do with me getting in a fight in grade school? You didn't read what I wrote. I said it was listed as a fee on a fine me and my family got because they fine everyone involved when you get in a fight. You don't want to understand my point of view so fuck you. Shill.
@Theyallfloatdownhere You said, actually, that the Patriot Act was a means to control "our system." This was a little vague, but unless you meant, "our system of terrorism," I did not repeat you at all. I read what you wrote very carefully, and respectfully disagree. And I was not the one who arbitrarily mentioned some fight I got into in school, you were. I merely said that it was unrelated to the topic, which it is. I also never called you stupid. You're projecting your own opinion onto me.
@Yeahcoolwhatever I am saying it is used against us and is taking money wealth and power away from us. That was an example of the ludicrous crap that those laws tend to do in my own life. They took money from kids because they fought and called it no child left behind. That is only one example. The patriot act its self isn't good because it like the no child left behind act is used against us. That is what they do, they are crooks. That is retarded, that's what happened.
@Yeahcoolwhatever The patriot act is bad maybe I do have something to hide? Maybe I like not being on a list of people the government doesn't like. Heck I bet I am because I disagree with them. I don't want to wire tapped I don't want to be spied on. That is wrong and is unconstitutional. They simply write what they want and use these acts to do a lot of harm to everyday living that is my point.
THEY ARE THE ENEMY! They planned it from the start.
@Theyallfloatdownhere I'm sorry if I called you stupid. Aside from that, I disagree with many decisions that have been made, and yet I don't fear the Patriot Act. It isn't unconstitutional at all, however, as tested by the justices of the Supreme Court.
As to being used against you, all they can do is listen to what you're saying over a wiretap or monitor me on the internet. They can't act on anything unless they find that one of us is doing something illegal, and they are bound by due process
@SoldierCyfix u're being politically-correct!. It's Treasonous. ART3: 'Treason against the United States [that wld be u & me], shall consist ONLY in levying War against them, [pretty much describes the Patriot Act] or in adhering to their Enemies [[Terrorists-is there an enemy we [Congress] don't give foreign aid and comfort to? Financial Terrorists mainly?]], giving them Aid and Comfort...[to totally destroy us?]
Yeah, i know, takes 2 witnesses. Where 're we gonna find them?
borrowing money from the FED means having to pay the FED interest on money the FED doesnt have, just prints. if gov spends money to create something, they order a "chair" or a road from you. you make it & get paid money from the gov. the gov gets a road it can toll or give to you & business which means wealth has been CREATED. why should gov "borrow" money at interest from the FED, money the FED doesnt have money is supposed to reflect work thats being DONE, not FED NUMBERS borrowed at interest!
I hear that alot.. I dont agree with everything ron Paul says.. but Im glad hes there.
But I support Ron Paul and I support everything Ive heard him say to this day.. Not because im a blind follower.. but because its simple and makes sense!
He upholds democratic-republicanism! Democracy is a terrible form of government, as we can see what is happening today and what happened in Greece. Ron Paul believes in the very ideals that Thomas Jefferson and his people preached.
oh im sorry i meant get the fuck out of south africa your not american so you definitely dont know what your talking about lol YOUR A FOLLOWER OF WHAT THE NEWS TELLS YOU LOL IDIOT
peopleasylum do me a favor, get the fuck out of the united states,you represent a blind follower of these devils and are the true enemy of what freedom stands for shame on you sir...
We need to End the Federal Reserve. It is NOT Federal, and there is no Reserve. Also bring the troops home, ending this Empire and rather than police everyone, protect the Union.
Just type "JBS end fed contact congress" into google and click the top link, Send a pre wrtten letter to congress about abolishing the Federal Reserve!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I think he should rather concentrate on bringing some of his ideas closer to the now elected adiministration. With Obama, you have now at least an opening for these ideas to be heard. A government cannot solve all community problems by itself, it must be a positive force in addressing community needs.
It's up to the people now to bring the change. With Obama, you have a chance.
@Beauchard He did win the nomination in Nevada but the republican party stole it from him. He also won many of the debates according to polls but you would never have heard it on Faux news. Poor guy. I really love him but his son can go to hell. And I don't entirely agree with him on getting the government to deregulate everything either. The so called free market is just too fucked up to give those bastards with free rein now. He could have won if we had real democracy. He was great in Brüno.
and he really doesnt have any ideas for helping common people...I agree the american empire is collapsing.......but really thats a no brainer. he isnt saying anything more than common sense. it isnt radical thinking at all
How will Ron Paul bring health care to all?
more private enterprise hospitals? I just dont understand is free for all remedy.....but I agree republicans ahve caused a big disaster(Reganomics)
Yeah Ron Paul is pro private enterprise which in cause will create another facsist way of ruling and eslaving. Private enterprises could in fact do whatever they wanted and work however they please. Hospitals should be ran by the local government such as the whole county.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yes Ron Paul I guess is a Laissez-faire capitalist....no taxes(so no schools,no roads,no fire dept,gee and no money for government like him) its an ignorant idea that in reality doesnt work.Americans have tried Laissez-faire capitalism (reganomics) and now it has failed........and even G W Bush is now nationalizing the banks..
.so much for Ron Pauls Laissez-faire capitalism .....the 1920's had a sort of Laissez-faire attitude that ended in the Great depression.
Sorry, you are wrong. He does not mean no taxes, he means no federal income tax, the greatest portion of tax anyone pays that goes to pay Federal Reserve debt. The other tax tax like state tax, sales tax, propery tax etc. (and those actually funds the the law enforcement,hospitals, etc.) be based by local bodies and businesses providing those services and not by federal govt. Govt. is an overhead and the last person to say how much anything should cost. The market should decide that.
well for all i know common sense is not so common any more or else how do you explain how people mock what he say, and sure the people who will keep the war on going and letting the military suck our money away will give health care right ? i think freedoom is not that important anymore keep our wallets full get to be the ultimate goal to me he makes alot of sense i am not afraid of change
thanks for the comment azaquihel.I am sure Ron paul means well but I doubt his ideas will work government does have a role to play..especialy protecting the weak from the strong.You mentioned the military, I think the USA has over 700 bases worldwide.......way too many bases
he is Catholic ,pro life, and like to deregulated but hell i like him a lot ,and the fact that he was out of the reace like that make me so afraid of the way people think in this country
how can people eat so much shit and still think everything is ok
He's lying... he won't change a thing in the drug wars. Maybe reduce the charges for crack/cocaine offenses for the underprivileged in the cities but other than that I don't believe he will change anything.
So the word Anarchy or Anarchism in indeed suitable for this kind of social ideology. Because like I said it without government or external authority does not necessarily mean there would be chaos if people decided to work together rather than fight. Besides if given a more satisfactory life to people with no homelessnes it would not take people as far as to have to steal or kill for food. Example(If I drop my cellphone it could possibly break, but well manufacture(edu) the chances are minimal)
neolestat13 has a great idea but the first step towards "anarchy" is redistributing the power to create currency (a medium of exchange for goods and services) to the people. Money=debt in this current system and debt=money so if everyone paid off their debt (including gov) there would be no money in circulation. I do believe we will change (much later on in the future) to a RESOURCE based economy. Google the "Venus Project" very idealistic yet practical (in the near future)
You have deluded yourself. Forced government is slavery. Anarchism is just no rulers over other without his/her consent. It doesn't mean choas or no rules.
You obviously haven't even studied the basics of free market anarchism. Why Ron Paul supporters try to make the same stupid arguments socialists and other statists use is laughable to further their own dogma about limited government. If you actually want to learn something go to these users channels and watch their videos
with cooperation and logical rationality would lead to a society where there is no government in the sense of useless politicians that we have now. There would be educated individuals (common workers) coordinating with other people to handle exchange, economic statues and so forth. Politicians and presidents are not the people handling those things in modern times. Their job is to say yes or no to proposed laws and legistations just like kings. Anarchy is would not necessarily cause chaos.
(articulate and educated intellectual political philosopher of the mid 1800's) was the first self proclaimed anarchist. It was the word that suited the best to the political ideology of this individuals. It is an interesting and important political ideology to be taught in schools because it is flexible in any kind of environment and society as long as it works for everyone fairly and rationally.There is nothing brutal about opposing war, hunger, agression, fascist militarism, imperialism.
So it would still have as many legs as it actually has. Maybe he lost a leg so now he has three. Or he already was born with 2 legs and lost one then he has one. It depends with how many legs he was born and how many he's lost throughout his life. It depends on the actual number of legs.
Anarchy if from the greek words, An and Arkhe. An means no or without Arkhe means Government or Authority. The word anarchy, all it means is wihtout government of authority. That notion that without government there is chaos and destruction doesn't mean that there is no laws based on rationality and fairness. Anarchism means that a society can function without the external authority of governments. If people were actually educated then they would realize their power to rule themselves (cont ^)
Ron Paul, Mike Gravel and Patrick Buchanan are heros of American politics, those men who understand the constitution and founding of the republic and have a realistic, non-pathalogical vision for the future. They do not subscribe to 'the perpetual war for perpetual peace'.
I think that the BIG secret may be that Ron Paul actually won all of the primaries, but the true data has been disappeared.
It would also not surprise me to hear that Ron Paul or members of his family had been threatened in some diabolical way to force him to drop out of the "official" race.
Ron Paul could mop the floor with any candidate in an open debate.
Search Google Video for:
"Ron Paul - In the Name of Patriotism (Who are the Patriots?)"
I would not be surprised, but as much as a revolutionary as his may sound, believe me libertarianism is fundamentaly right, even Noam Chomsky and other prestigious and articulate professionals who know what Ron Paul is all about would never vote for him. But under people's eyes watching TV it would have been logical people felt like he was the "guy". He was errased as the actual first president of the US John Hanson was from history.
Noam Chomsky would never want to be a president or ask or want people to follow him. He is not even an idol to me but simply a very smart individual. Chomsky is an anarchist why would he want people to vote or accept him?? He lays out the facts.
Maybe you don't fully understand anarchism. Anarchism has nothing to do whether you are smart or not. It is just a liberation from everything you taught to accept as the norm. It takes research to consider yourself an anarchist or be consider one, but Chomsky is not just any anarchist, but a very smart anarchist.Arguably the most important intellectual of our times.Even the fraudulent totalitarian tyrants killed many anarchists after the 1917 "social" revolution in fear of their stage to be torn
Anarchy is quite simply, and fundamentally, the law of the jungle. No intelligent, or otherwise enlightened person would ever support such a scheme, unless they themselves are either insane, or relish in, or have a fetish for, raw brutality.
Raw brutality?? Where do you get that from. There is Anarchy, a state of lawlessness and Anarchism the political theory which was put into practice from 1936 to 1939 and applied with modern industrialization. It was only defeated by the military power of the fascist Francisco Franco under the help of the Soviets. Anarchism was named after anarchy the greek word meaning without government or authority (meaning external authority). It was adopted after Pierre Joseph (articulate and educted..cont ^
"The free market is very protective of the environment"-RP Really??
If this is true, then please some1 tell me how! I can think of endless examples of how this is not true.
Hemp? Maybe, but this also seems dubius to me. Here is why I think hemp is not a good bio-fuel: the main way most plants store energy is in sugars, usually stored in roots. Hemp is fibrous, not sugary. Hey, I may be wrong though... let me know.
Why do these weird-fringe wannabe-politicos always bring up hemp?
Why are we paying for a European Empire & its agenda with American lives & deeper public debt ?
rwattonville 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL IS GOING TO BE PROSECUTED BY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO CALL AMERICAN PEOPLE INVADERS AND INITIATORS OF WARS.
RON PAUL SAID THE USA INVADES COUNTRIES AND STARTS WARS, WHICH GIVES USA A BAD REPUTATION AROUND THE WORLD , THEREFORE IT IS CONSIDERED A CRIME . A US CITIZEN WHO
WAS BORN IN USA CANT GO AGAINST GOVERNMENT POLICIES WHICH MIGHT TREATEN THE FUTURE
OF THE COUNTRYS SECURITY .
RON PAUL WILL BE PROSECUTED BY US GOVERNMENT!
democratsaresmart 8 months ago
As for the environmental problems, Ron Paul wanting to legalize gold and silver as legal tender, would probably do more than any other policy anyone could ever dream of. This would probably in a manner of years even out prices a great deal between China and USA, and therefore stop the shipping of goods around the globe that can perfectly well be made locally.
mortalisk 8 months ago
You know, Ron Paul can really stick it to the other candidates when he has to...the whole 'McCain is a maverick because he colludes with the liberals' comment...bulls-eye. Ron Paul=true maverick. RON PAUL 2012!
BTW, not a direct quote above, just what my ears heard between the lines.
y0k0z00na 8 months ago
I can't even count to a trillon......why don't the USA buy the entire world for once.??? I think it will save a lot of money
juron76 8 months ago
How the hell did I get here? I was watching Family Guy just 10 minutes ago.
62782kn 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL IS GOING TO BE PROSECUTED BY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! ITS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO CALL AMERICAN PEOPLE INVADERS AND INITIATERS OF WARS.
RON PAUL SAID THE USA INVADES COUNTRIES AND STARTS WARS, WHICH GIVES USA A BAD REPUTATION AROUND THE WORLD , THEREFORE IT IS CONSIDERED A CRIME . A US CITIZEN WHO
WAS BORN IN USA CANT GO AGAINST GOVERNMENT POLICIES WHICH MIGHT TREATEN THE FUTURE
OF THE COUNTRYS SECURITY .
RON PAUL WILL BE PROSECUTED BY US GOVERNMENT!
democratsaresmart 8 months ago
Ron paul is one of the good guys for the secret society, Im just sayin man.
tlrflyguy860 10 months ago
Nice videos this you tube world just gets bigger every day! When you have time come visit my channel!
pheromoneaction 10 months ago
I like his integrity. He's talking sense. Anyone can see the US has extended its reach beyond its resources. Look at what happens at home when there are no win situations being propped up overseas. Remember Vietnam. Our soldiers are being killed & injured there in an unwinable war. Just like Vietnam. Bring them home & show more respect for lives & taxpayer money. Keep telling us the truth. Please elect Ron Paul for President & save the US from implosion, the rumour machine and financial ruin.
creatms 10 months ago
@creatms
that's what i like about ron paul, he speaks his mind even when it's unpopular. all of the other candidates just say what they think will be popular, and change their opinions at the drop of a dime
projectbeard 10 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
If you believe in race, you are a racist. Race was created by elitist Europeans to divide the poor, create conditions for slavery so the people would be too busy looking at each other than the politicians and bankers who bleed them dry. If there is any hope for the USA, race most become obsolete and never used. ...if not, you'll fall right back in the same hole. ...or maybe cause another civil war. Race is not science, it's a lie.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
P: Ron Paul and VP: Paul Ryan 2012
2846odlab 1 year ago
RON PAUL is MY teacher MY leader the only person I gave permission to lead on my behaf. I recognize no ruler like so many do. You are allowed to ask others to lead for you but you can NOT impose a ruler on someone else, that would be slavery I am no slave.
ok1jwc 1 year ago
as soon as ron pauls mouth opens the truth was told about john mccooook the cracker
ThaBlackRadical 1 year ago
government's job: keep people from fucking with other people
StarCreme 1 year ago
In Canada, I am being psycholgically, sexually, emotionally, financially, socially tortured and bullied for last 2 years, openly for the crime of using my civil right of not speaking with Toronto police. Based on their unsubstantiated self serving theories they put me under 24 hrs video surveillance, they openly go around instigating hatred, slandering my name at my employment and I am being tortured everywhere i go, including at work, openly with management involved. Canada is not a democracy.
1kash123 1 year ago
@1kash123 you're being sexually tortured for not snitching?
garlicthethird 1 year ago
@garlicthethird
i have nothing to snitch about. Can you believe, the police has hired Tantrics to get me killed. I neeti if end up dead, it is malicious police work involving vudo and black magic etc.
1kash123 1 year ago
yes! HEMP is the best solution for energy resources.
ps: i also like getting high!
Zwastra 1 year ago
@hobatu
How about throwing obama out?
xMaXiMuSx 1 year ago
@hobatu
NO.
xMaXiMuSx 1 year ago
@hobatu
I dont advocate commie policy..
xMaXiMuSx 1 year ago
@hobatu
market regulates and the goverment enforces fraud,bankurptcy and contract laws.. End of story..
xMaXiMuSx 1 year ago
@hobatu
You dont udnerstand that regulation has to be done by the market and not by beauractrats who get in bed with special business.. We had all the regulations in the world but we couldn't madoff who made deals with the regulators.. remember he predicted all the economic trouble we would be in yearsgo before they happened.. if Anyone has credibility on economic issues it's him.
xMaXiMuSx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul for president
nickzah 1 year ago
@hobatu Ron Paul is against the New World Order /watch?v=HDXHbgpoI80
bjarnet3 1 year ago
With freedom and liberty, things can turn around really fast...
bjarnet3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Our world is hostage to the insatiable rampaging of the ruling class private gain and greed, dominating,dehumanising,devaluing everyone and everything in the midst. We can and must change the wage slavery of immense humanity in a market system of artificial scarcity . We can share the world for our common needs and well being in harmony within and without.
arzoyan 1 year ago
He's full of shit. No one has ever bought, or insured a nuclear power plant with it's own money; nuclear power has always required government intervention, which is why Japan and France (quite interventionist) have more nuke power than England.
SUpersaiyajinjerkbag 1 year ago
He read the Cliff Notes to Atlas Shrugged and then named his boy Rand
luridplanet 1 year ago
It's a very nice sentiment to say Ron Paul 2012 but we still have electronic voting machines in most of the states ... I don't think anything will change in the 2012 election even if by a miracle Ron Paul got elected. The machine has way too much control now ... more than in any time in history.
Watch for the upcoming PBS Frontlne Doc 'Top Secret America'. The NSA now wants you to know that they have total control & that their taking the kid gloves off and unzipping their pants. It's too late
FreewheelinPhrank 1 year ago
I love this guy.I just hope he doesn't become like obama.
mickybigdicky 1 year ago
He is the ONLY politician who gives a shit about the people! God Bless him!
bodybuilder444444 1 year ago 2
Ron Paul 2012!
bodybuilder444444 1 year ago
@chicseeker I agree ...I like Pauls views but it is how he delivers his lines, needs to be more charistmatic
61talya 1 year ago
thats why there is a problem with american voters. usa voters are more concerned abut weather a leader can sell rather than listen to the actual platform being introduced....
easy3s 1 year ago
@61talya Nah I wouldn't pander to people who need flashy lights and asthetic bells and whistles. If he gets his point across then so what. Maybe he doesn't care about manipulating your feelings?
Theyallfloatdownhere 1 year ago
@Theyallfloatdownhere I just feel like majority of the people who voted for Obama were very much 'smitten' by his charisma and his personality. He delivered his speeches with a very statesmen' like persona and Americans judge by appearance and personality first.....and then policies last, no matter what the history of that particular person maybe....Ron Paul is also a much older man then Obama and I think that works against him. Paul would have been a great leader.
61talya 1 year ago
Nuclear is only cheap because of how much money was put into it, however the current technology leaves a pool of radioactive waste that lasts for millions of years, well beyond the lifespan of any concrete containment housing. If nuclear is to be pursued we need to hassen the developement of pebble bed nuclear reactors, where the uranium or thorium is inside of a radiation indestructable graphite ball which lasts for 500 millions years or so.
yuri35434 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The nomadic monetary rampaging of profit has enslaed immense humanity, we have nothing to lose except all the illusions of freedom and choice.
arzoyan 1 year ago
Ron Paul makes total sense. The Republican Party is, for the most part, a theocratic, anti-freedom party. James Dobson even gets to vet their candidates, much the way the mullahs of Iran vet their candidates for "free" elections. The Democrats are simply liberal, in the European model, which works but could be much improved on. Libertarians and thinking liberals who understand freedom and recognize that the empire is doomed need to work together and create a new party.
JerryGing 1 year ago
this guy should be the US president not obama
20324758 1 year ago 52
@20324758 I agree I wish I knew more about his foreign policy views before I voted for the wrong man!
61talya 1 year ago
@20324758. The US was designed with separation of powers to prevent a President being able to do whatever he/she likes. Sure, he could probably fix the foreign policy crisis, but he needs to do more than just veto stuff that Congress sends him. He needs the support of Congress, which he wouldn't have. Instead, people should focus on getting as many non-bought candidates like Ron Paul and Ralph Nader into the Congress. Once that happens, you can move onto the Presidency.
SirPwn4lot 1 year ago
@SirPwn4lot There were alot of us worldwide, who were hoping so much for Obama to finally change the US. After all, that's what he said he would do. Two years later, he has done nothing, really... Nothing essential, anyway. Nothing to change the fundamental workings of the system. He could've stabilised the US as a modern mixed-economy welfare state with his first two years, but he didn't.
freedomthrough 10 months ago
@20324758 He seems the only one who's up to challenge the establishment. I'd prefer Bernie Sanders, though... They should form an alliance and take the best parts from both.
freedomthrough 10 months ago
I like Ron Paul but the reason he choked on the question of what to do about Coal is that Texas is the 4th largest producer of Coal in the US. So even though he is the most honest Republican out there he still is unwilling to confront Big Coal about pollution although he did present a solution to and I am sure is willing to endorse Wind and Solar also. I do not think Nuclear is the answer it is NOT clean, you have waste with Nuclear Power.
mymojorisin 1 year ago
Put more succinctly, there is no absolute "good" or "evil" where politics is involved - except in extreme cases like Nazism and Soviet communism - everything revolves around self-interest. Heck, even the black civil rights campaigners in the 1960s were "self-interested" individuals, caring more for their own rights than for those of other disenfranchised individuals;are they better or worse than the super-rich oil bastards?
(Oops, I may have answered my own question there.)
jamesgravil 2 years ago
I don't think W Bush was that ignorant. Bill Clinton's view of him, was he wasn't qualified to be elected to the office.
Iraq was planned in 2001, this was from the price of loyalty book. I originally read this from the last oil shock, check that website lastoilshock
We live in the time of energy resource competition, if any country decides to compete against America and Britain using force, we all lose. Moore didn't even touch the subject of oil decline
ocean3da 2 years ago
The only thing anyone can say with certainty is that politics is a dirty business, more so perhaps in the 20th/21st century than in any other era before. WWII was not a straightforward black-and-white affair, but there were at least some moral boundaries; the Cold War was all about ideology, the US propping up ugly fascist regimes around the world in order to support its own interests; now the world revolves around oil money. Rules have changed, but the game itself is pretty much the same. .
jamesgravil 2 years ago
when the Republic spoke, the Empire...
Edwin2442a 2 years ago
there's one aspect where i think Paul is definitely right. the government takes in more than enough money, it's just spent stupidly. but I've never heard him talk about health care. I don't think he'd be for universal health care though, so i don't think he'd have a real good shot at winning. i can never understand how these supposed christians are so selfish, and it's always godless lefty's who have to beg and plead to help poor people get anything.
johnnondrowsyd 2 years ago
He is not for universal healthcare, but as a physician, he would not be against government funding if it were the only way to provide poor people with medical care.
tonyac42 2 years ago 3
i hope so, cause too often people try to make medicair, medicaid, social security type stuff seem like government handouts that they just made up with no demand for them. people demanded it and a lot needed it. I have no clue if we could provide everyone with good health care with just the market though. my gut leads me to think no though.
johnnondrowsyd 2 years ago
Ron Paul thinks that everyone should get medical care, but he does not advocate the political solution that would solve the problem, but it is different from his party view that people should not get medical care unless they pay for it.
tonyac42 2 years ago
One thing I disagree with Paul on is the healthcare issue, or at least, I don't quite understand how his idea of healthcare reform will help everyone. Perhaps I'm missing someting. But I'm a die-hard liberal, and I have to say, Paul was the most level-headed, realistic and what appeared to be the most honest Presidential candidate running. I only regret not knowing, back in Nov of 2008, about him what I know now. I would have voted for him.
Mechelle68 2 years ago 2
It's the media's fault that you didn't know who he was.
JamesBlakeWilliams 2 years ago
The programs for poor people almost never have the effects they are meant to.
modmastermind111 2 years ago
Ron Paul for President in 2012!
im1greatman 2 years ago 6
Finally! It's frereshing to see a political candidate that hasn't jumped on the 'green' wagon and still open to debating the fact that it might not be us causing 'Climate Change' if it is happening at all!
This is the kind of guy that should be in power; someone who concentrates on the real issues and doesn't try to tax us for a non-existant cause. Dead on with the nuclear power, if AGW was a problem then it comes at no cost to us to switch over our power plants to nuclear.
Astrosisphere 2 years ago
If Ron Paul continue his crusade and gain more popularity, it's only a matter of time before the shadow government assassinate him. Just like the kill Lincoln and Kennedy.
superchink28 2 years ago
R.E. superchink28
Only if they decide he's a threat. Let's face it, most Americans aren't very politically astute. They elected Bush, and he had all the charisma and political know-how of a chimpanzee; they elected Barack Obama, who is charismatic but clearly not as experienced or as capable a political as Ron Paul; the overriding rule in US politics seems to be "it's not *what* you know, it's *who* you know." The American people have dug their own grave, as far as I'm concerned.
jamesgravil 2 years ago
Bush's election was rigged (at least the second time around). The one who in charge of the ballot counting was his own brother!
No way in hell American people voted Bush again the second time!
superchink28 2 years ago
I think you got that the wrong way round, Bush WAS elected the second time, it was the first time he rigged the election. That's what's so baffling. There are pieces of lemon peel floating through Manhattan that would make a better President than him, there are monkeys in African forests as yet unexplored that have a better grasp of the English language than that tree-swingin' ape. Bush may not be a tyrant - leave that to Cheney - but if anything he was an incompetent buffoon.
jamesgravil 2 years ago 4
@jamesgravil
So did George have no say about the patriot act?
ocean3da 2 years ago
Bush was a puppet, the ones pulling the strings were Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. And goodness knows who else. The oligarchs on Wall Street, the oil financiers in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East, the Bin Ladens - we know the Bush family and the Bin Ladens had a close relationship, and the Saudis are estimated to have around a trillion dollars invested in the US economy. (That's a whole lotta cash - see Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 if you don't believe me.)
jamesgravil 2 years ago
I don't think George Bush is/was a genuinely "bad" person, and perhaps I was a little scathing in my description of him before, but he was a fool, and cleverly manipulated by those around him. Kind of a Cladius/Emperor Nero of the 21st century. Time will tell. Possibly he even believes in American liberties and the rule of law, but he doesn't done much to uphold them. That's the problem with someone who believes he is doing the right thing, and won't be told otherwise, when clearly he's not.
jamesgravil 2 years ago
this guy is way ahead of his time, i like obama but i feel he may be more show than go, obamas connection to the rockefella's only consolidates my suspitions. another opportunity lost for real change cld be the outcome.
smakdoubt 2 years ago
well, we are a hybrid of democracy and a republic. we have a constitution. we vote for leaders to go to congress and speak for us. and we vote for state propositions
SoldierCyfix 2 years ago
"and to the republic for which it stands" america was founded as a constitutional republic not a democracy. ben franklin said it best; "democracy is where you have 51% controlling the other 49%". our freedoms are protected by the constitution which is slowly being revoked by things like the P.a.t.r.i.o.t. act which is actually an acronoym that explains exactly what it does. find out for your self.
BlueTunisia 2 years ago
"and to the republic for which it stands" america was founded as a constitutional republic not a democracy. ben franklin said it best; "democracy is where you have 51% controlling the other 49%". our freedoms are protected by the constitution which is slowly being revoked by things like the P.a.t.r.i.o.t. act which is actually an acronoym that explains exactly what it does. find out for your self.
e7573t 2 years ago 5
the patriot act is a direct anti-constitution bill.
SoldierCyfix 2 years ago 52
you would be surprised how many people dont know that.
mythumbsupaccount 2 years ago 4
@SoldierCyfix With the Patriot Act, Americans' secrets are a little harder to hide. The only people who fear it are the guilty. No tanks are rolling down the streets, soldiers don't patrol outside your home. Overall, there have been no big bad repercussions as a result of it. The Patriot Act was legally recognized by congress, and followed every constitutional restriction. Then again, trying to find something coherent on youtube is like trying to get 4chan to make sense. I don't blame you.
Yeahcoolwhatever 1 year ago
@Yeahcoolwhatever No its a means to corrupt and control our system and us get it straight. Heck I got in a fight at school in 8th grade for being bullied and on the fine there was a charge that read before it "no child left behind" hahaha fuck you little sheeple they want to make money off of you they don't even care about the kids. Why you?
Theyallfloatdownhere 1 year ago
@Theyallfloatdownhere corrupt and control our system? The Patriot Act's only aim is to watch and listen, not to control anything other than terrorism. It does control that system, and I can't imagine you want terrorism to remain uncontrolled.
And what does you getting in a fight in school have to do with no child left behind; and what does no child left behind have to do with the Patriot Act? Organize your thoughts.
Yeahcoolwhatever 1 year ago
@Yeahcoolwhatever Oh yeah im the stupid one. I plainly said what you said back to me what DOES it have to do with me getting in a fight in grade school? You didn't read what I wrote. I said it was listed as a fee on a fine me and my family got because they fine everyone involved when you get in a fight. You don't want to understand my point of view so fuck you. Shill.
Theyallfloatdownhere 1 year ago
@Theyallfloatdownhere You said, actually, that the Patriot Act was a means to control "our system." This was a little vague, but unless you meant, "our system of terrorism," I did not repeat you at all. I read what you wrote very carefully, and respectfully disagree. And I was not the one who arbitrarily mentioned some fight I got into in school, you were. I merely said that it was unrelated to the topic, which it is. I also never called you stupid. You're projecting your own opinion onto me.
Yeahcoolwhatever 1 year ago
@Yeahcoolwhatever I am saying it is used against us and is taking money wealth and power away from us. That was an example of the ludicrous crap that those laws tend to do in my own life. They took money from kids because they fought and called it no child left behind. That is only one example. The patriot act its self isn't good because it like the no child left behind act is used against us. That is what they do, they are crooks. That is retarded, that's what happened.
Theyallfloatdownhere 1 year ago
@Yeahcoolwhatever The patriot act is bad maybe I do have something to hide? Maybe I like not being on a list of people the government doesn't like. Heck I bet I am because I disagree with them. I don't want to wire tapped I don't want to be spied on. That is wrong and is unconstitutional. They simply write what they want and use these acts to do a lot of harm to everyday living that is my point.
THEY ARE THE ENEMY! They planned it from the start.
Theyallfloatdownhere 1 year ago
@Yeahcoolwhatever You did call me stupid in a passive aggressive way so fuck you you sly cooter.
Theyallfloatdownhere 1 year ago
@Theyallfloatdownhere I'm sorry if I called you stupid. Aside from that, I disagree with many decisions that have been made, and yet I don't fear the Patriot Act. It isn't unconstitutional at all, however, as tested by the justices of the Supreme Court.
As to being used against you, all they can do is listen to what you're saying over a wiretap or monitor me on the internet. They can't act on anything unless they find that one of us is doing something illegal, and they are bound by due process
Yeahcoolwhatever 1 year ago
@Yeahcoolwhatever No illegal doesn't mean wrong or right. I disagree with them putting me on a list, as if I am a threat to them.
They aren't restricted by due process that is unrealistic.
Theyallfloatdownhere 1 year ago
Comment removed
Yeahcoolwhatever 1 year ago
@SoldierCyfix u're being politically-correct!. It's Treasonous. ART3: 'Treason against the United States [that wld be u & me], shall consist ONLY in levying War against them, [pretty much describes the Patriot Act] or in adhering to their Enemies [[Terrorists-is there an enemy we [Congress] don't give foreign aid and comfort to? Financial Terrorists mainly?]], giving them Aid and Comfort...[to totally destroy us?]
Yeah, i know, takes 2 witnesses. Where 're we gonna find them?
saturnined 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
borrowing money from the FED means having to pay the FED interest on money the FED doesnt have, just prints. if gov spends money to create something, they order a "chair" or a road from you. you make it & get paid money from the gov. the gov gets a road it can toll or give to you & business which means wealth has been CREATED. why should gov "borrow" money at interest from the FED, money the FED doesnt have money is supposed to reflect work thats being DONE, not FED NUMBERS borrowed at interest!
gunthaarz 2 years ago
Wow Ron Paul seems very inteligente and seems to know what he's talking about.
How could he now win!
discoinfern0 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
jesuschrustpizza 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is falling behind on the "Times" 100 most influential people list. Rate him " 100" and lets get him to number one!
RoseyNightingale 2 years ago
I feel like a total moron that I didn't support him in the last primary. Worst political mistake of my life. :-(
kmg501 2 years ago 2
he is 100% right about bringing US troops home , all this world police role caused us was economical and political problems .
xellosyassinove 2 years ago
Whether u agree with him or not - Ron Paul comes across as a true upholder of democracy.
Struckgold 3 years ago 2
I hear that alot.. I dont agree with everything ron Paul says.. but Im glad hes there.
But I support Ron Paul and I support everything Ive heard him say to this day.. Not because im a blind follower.. but because its simple and makes sense!
majortom321 3 years ago 4
he does not uphold democracy....lol
RP4409 3 years ago
Ron P. does not uphold democracy? explain...
Struckgold 3 years ago
He upholds democratic-republicanism! Democracy is a terrible form of government, as we can see what is happening today and what happened in Greece. Ron Paul believes in the very ideals that Thomas Jefferson and his people preached.
luciusETRUR 2 years ago
paul is wrong about nuclear power and immigration--he is right on about telling the truth.
bajawind 3 years ago
Ron Paul best man for USA,unfortunately cud not be President this time
VICTIMofSYDNEY 3 years ago
oh im sorry i meant get the fuck out of south africa your not american so you definitely dont know what your talking about lol YOUR A FOLLOWER OF WHAT THE NEWS TELLS YOU LOL IDIOT
death2nw0 3 years ago
peopleasylum do me a favor, get the fuck out of the united states,you represent a blind follower of these devils and are the true enemy of what freedom stands for shame on you sir...
death2nw0 3 years ago
Maybe you want to check his voting history before you type that nonsense.
xxmonickkkkaxx 3 years ago
RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!!!
repta 3 years ago 5
We need to End the Federal Reserve. It is NOT Federal, and there is no Reserve. Also bring the troops home, ending this Empire and rather than police everyone, protect the Union.
3DNC 3 years ago 10
@3DNC you're mentally ill :))
greeniem 1 year ago
:))
3DNC 1 year ago
Only thing government can create is debt
mergupis 3 years ago 4
what about roads and the other forms of infrastructure that society is built based
aaronburrsociety 3 years ago
please do LOL
capnvideo2006 3 years ago
To capnvideo2006: I say that I would take a bullet for Dr. Ron Paul, and you reply "please do LOL".
The ideas that Ron Paul stands for are the same ideas that thousands have already taken a bullet for during the American revolution?
Would you say to them, "please do LOL"...?
Hackiesacker007 3 years ago 8
Hellz yea
Shoot capn
Then take a bullet =D
Garbonzo07 3 years ago
Just type "JBS end fed contact congress" into google and click the top link, Send a pre wrtten letter to congress about abolishing the Federal Reserve!
Send To Congress Share With Everyone
r3dredwine 3 years ago
Damn I really think Ron Paul could have won
Beauchard 3 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think he should rather concentrate on bringing some of his ideas closer to the now elected adiministration. With Obama, you have now at least an opening for these ideas to be heard. A government cannot solve all community problems by itself, it must be a positive force in addressing community needs.
It's up to the people now to bring the change. With Obama, you have a chance.
JacksInn 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHA YOU ARE HILARIOUS YOU FUCKING MORON. Obama is the last thing the individual needs you dumb fuck.
LifeLibertyLove 3 years ago 7
not as long as the powers that be give him almost zero media coverage despite his widespread support. he who owns the media choses the president.
USAFalling 3 years ago 9
@Beauchard He did win the nomination in Nevada but the republican party stole it from him. He also won many of the debates according to polls but you would never have heard it on Faux news. Poor guy. I really love him but his son can go to hell. And I don't entirely agree with him on getting the government to deregulate everything either. The so called free market is just too fucked up to give those bastards with free rein now. He could have won if we had real democracy. He was great in Brüno.
hamnose 1 year ago
problem problem..........he is a republican.
and he really doesnt have any ideas for helping common people...I agree the american empire is collapsing.......but really thats a no brainer. he isnt saying anything more than common sense. it isnt radical thinking at all
How will Ron Paul bring health care to all?
more private enterprise hospitals? I just dont understand is free for all remedy.....but I agree republicans ahve caused a big disaster(Reganomics)
capnvideo2006 3 years ago
but then common sense is also very unrepublican.
Psycnosis 3 years ago 2
Yeah Ron Paul is pro private enterprise which in cause will create another facsist way of ruling and eslaving. Private enterprises could in fact do whatever they wanted and work however they please. Hospitals should be ran by the local government such as the whole county.
neolestat13 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yes Ron Paul I guess is a Laissez-faire capitalist....no taxes(so no schools,no roads,no fire dept,gee and no money for government like him) its an ignorant idea that in reality doesnt work.Americans have tried Laissez-faire capitalism (reganomics) and now it has failed........and even G W Bush is now nationalizing the banks..
.so much for Ron Pauls Laissez-faire capitalism .....the 1920's had a sort of Laissez-faire attitude that ended in the Great depression.
capnvideo2006 3 years ago
I rather support local banks.
neolestat13 3 years ago
Sorry, you are wrong. He does not mean no taxes, he means no federal income tax, the greatest portion of tax anyone pays that goes to pay Federal Reserve debt. The other tax tax like state tax, sales tax, propery tax etc. (and those actually funds the the law enforcement,hospitals, etc.) be based by local bodies and businesses providing those services and not by federal govt. Govt. is an overhead and the last person to say how much anything should cost. The market should decide that.
LORDOFWARS8 3 years ago
well for all i know common sense is not so common any more or else how do you explain how people mock what he say, and sure the people who will keep the war on going and letting the military suck our money away will give health care right ? i think freedoom is not that important anymore keep our wallets full get to be the ultimate goal to me he makes alot of sense i am not afraid of change
azaquihel 3 years ago 2
thanks for the comment azaquihel.I am sure Ron paul means well but I doubt his ideas will work government does have a role to play..especialy protecting the weak from the strong.You mentioned the military, I think the USA has over 700 bases worldwide.......way too many bases
capnvideo2006 3 years ago
Ron Paul is the first politician I gave a shit about.
Thrashaero 3 years ago 21
i can say the same
he is Catholic ,pro life, and like to deregulated but hell i like him a lot ,and the fact that he was out of the reace like that make me so afraid of the way people think in this country
how can people eat so much shit and still think everything is ok
azaquihel 3 years ago
you couldn't have said it better
DCxxRay 3 years ago
such a lovable man.its a shame
yorkpa29 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
so lonely tonight on cam have msn!!! msg me jane23belle
bladesmansam2007 3 years ago
Ron Paul is my President
Patriot4Liberty1776 3 years ago 4
Skull N Bones is your President & Commander & Chief !
Don't throw Ron Paul under bus for last 8yrs please.
euro944t 3 years ago
Obama stated he wants to decriminalize weed.
Phony law lobbied by Private Prison Industry.
85% of grass smokers only use grass.
Gateway drug ? Statistics say otherwise. We don't know complete facts, research funds are suppressed, what is the gov't hiding ?
euro944t 3 years ago
He's lying... he won't change a thing in the drug wars. Maybe reduce the charges for crack/cocaine offenses for the underprivileged in the cities but other than that I don't believe he will change anything.
gemhunter99 3 years ago
So Bob Barr is authentic is your point ? LOL. He is as authentic as a Chicken McNugget.
Understand, voting lesser of 2 evils is what voting is. Evil wins either way.
euro944t 3 years ago
So the word Anarchy or Anarchism in indeed suitable for this kind of social ideology. Because like I said it without government or external authority does not necessarily mean there would be chaos if people decided to work together rather than fight. Besides if given a more satisfactory life to people with no homelessnes it would not take people as far as to have to steal or kill for food. Example(If I drop my cellphone it could possibly break, but well manufacture(edu) the chances are minimal)
neolestat13 3 years ago
You are deluding yourself, neolestat13. Anarchy is the law of the jungle; nothing more.
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
neolestat13 has a great idea but the first step towards "anarchy" is redistributing the power to create currency (a medium of exchange for goods and services) to the people. Money=debt in this current system and debt=money so if everyone paid off their debt (including gov) there would be no money in circulation. I do believe we will change (much later on in the future) to a RESOURCE based economy. Google the "Venus Project" very idealistic yet practical (in the near future)
alby711 3 years ago
If what you are told is true to you then it is only true to those who told you and you.
yamilink03 3 years ago
You have deluded yourself. Forced government is slavery. Anarchism is just no rulers over other without his/her consent. It doesn't mean choas or no rules.
overmind25 3 years ago
We've all heard of revisionist history, overmind25. Are we now playing some kind of game with revisionist denotations?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
What are you typing about?
overmind25 3 years ago
Is that a PC or pedantic question?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
So he who has most gold makes rules.
So in gun ban zones, I bring in a big gun, I make the rules.
Gee anarchy sounds fun, the Mafia would like to fund your candidacy overmind25. Supply and demand crime.
euro944t 3 years ago
You obviously haven't even studied the basics of free market anarchism. Why Ron Paul supporters try to make the same stupid arguments socialists and other statists use is laughable to further their own dogma about limited government. If you actually want to learn something go to these users channels and watch their videos
Libertyisnotgiven
Xomniverse brainpolice2
stefbot
overmind25 3 years ago
with cooperation and logical rationality would lead to a society where there is no government in the sense of useless politicians that we have now. There would be educated individuals (common workers) coordinating with other people to handle exchange, economic statues and so forth. Politicians and presidents are not the people handling those things in modern times. Their job is to say yes or no to proposed laws and legistations just like kings. Anarchy is would not necessarily cause chaos.
neolestat13 3 years ago
(articulate and educated intellectual political philosopher of the mid 1800's) was the first self proclaimed anarchist. It was the word that suited the best to the political ideology of this individuals. It is an interesting and important political ideology to be taught in schools because it is flexible in any kind of environment and society as long as it works for everyone fairly and rationally.There is nothing brutal about opposing war, hunger, agression, fascist militarism, imperialism.
neolestat13 3 years ago
If you call a dog's tail a leg, neolestat13, how many legs does a dog have?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
If I call a dog's tail a leg the fact that is a tail would not make it a leg if I call it a leg.
neolestat13 3 years ago
So it would still have as many legs as it actually has. Maybe he lost a leg so now he has three. Or he already was born with 2 legs and lost one then he has one. It depends with how many legs he was born and how many he's lost throughout his life. It depends on the actual number of legs.
neolestat13 3 years ago
So why do you persist, then, in calling anarchy something it is not?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Anarchy if from the greek words, An and Arkhe. An means no or without Arkhe means Government or Authority. The word anarchy, all it means is wihtout government of authority. That notion that without government there is chaos and destruction doesn't mean that there is no laws based on rationality and fairness. Anarchism means that a society can function without the external authority of governments. If people were actually educated then they would realize their power to rule themselves (cont ^)
neolestat13 3 years ago
Ron Paul IS the President.
No fake election necessary.
SPREAD THE MESSAGE!!!
watch?v=v0VKu3U--so
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Ron Paul, Mike Gravel and Patrick Buchanan are heros of American politics, those men who understand the constitution and founding of the republic and have a realistic, non-pathalogical vision for the future. They do not subscribe to 'the perpetual war for perpetual peace'.
tacklinfuel1 3 years ago
tacklinfuel1: I wonder, why won't americans vote massively for someone like Ron Paul?
SurferRosa79 3 years ago
I think that the BIG secret may be that Ron Paul actually won all of the primaries, but the true data has been disappeared.
It would also not surprise me to hear that Ron Paul or members of his family had been threatened in some diabolical way to force him to drop out of the "official" race.
Ron Paul could mop the floor with any candidate in an open debate.
Search Google Video for:
"Ron Paul - In the Name of Patriotism (Who are the Patriots?)"
videoplay?docid=-5792391565012624048
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
I would not be surprised, but as much as a revolutionary as his may sound, believe me libertarianism is fundamentaly right, even Noam Chomsky and other prestigious and articulate professionals who know what Ron Paul is all about would never vote for him. But under people's eyes watching TV it would have been logical people felt like he was the "guy". He was errased as the actual first president of the US John Hanson was from history.
neolestat13 3 years ago
Well, I would never vote for Noam Chomsky, so I guess that makes it even. :)
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Noam Chomsky would never want to be a president or ask or want people to follow him. He is not even an idol to me but simply a very smart individual. Chomsky is an anarchist why would he want people to vote or accept him?? He lays out the facts.
neolestat13 3 years ago
Anyone who is an anarchist is not very smart.
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Maybe you don't fully understand anarchism. Anarchism has nothing to do whether you are smart or not. It is just a liberation from everything you taught to accept as the norm. It takes research to consider yourself an anarchist or be consider one, but Chomsky is not just any anarchist, but a very smart anarchist.Arguably the most important intellectual of our times.Even the fraudulent totalitarian tyrants killed many anarchists after the 1917 "social" revolution in fear of their stage to be torn
neolestat13 3 years ago
you were taught**
neolestat13 3 years ago
Anarchy is quite simply, and fundamentally, the law of the jungle. No intelligent, or otherwise enlightened person would ever support such a scheme, unless they themselves are either insane, or relish in, or have a fetish for, raw brutality.
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Raw brutality?? Where do you get that from. There is Anarchy, a state of lawlessness and Anarchism the political theory which was put into practice from 1936 to 1939 and applied with modern industrialization. It was only defeated by the military power of the fascist Francisco Franco under the help of the Soviets. Anarchism was named after anarchy the greek word meaning without government or authority (meaning external authority). It was adopted after Pierre Joseph (articulate and educted..cont ^
neolestat13 3 years ago
"The free market is very protective of the environment"-RP Really??
If this is true, then please some1 tell me how! I can think of endless examples of how this is not true.
Hemp? Maybe, but this also seems dubius to me. Here is why I think hemp is not a good bio-fuel: the main way most plants store energy is in sugars, usually stored in roots. Hemp is fibrous, not sugary. Hey, I may be wrong though... let me know.
Why do these weird-fringe wannabe-politicos always bring up hemp?
Narodnik47 3 years ago