She speaks eloquently enough and is funny enough for me to go along with her rant about Bill O'Relliy. But, i can sort of see why both their shows have low ratings if all they do is bitch about each other. Still though, team Rachel Maddows all the way.
All Major News Outlets Have Left-Leaning Bias that ‘Distorts’ Minds. A professor from UCLA has just published a book that exposes the left wing bias in news organizations. The book is called Left Turn - How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind. In the book Groseclose states that- All mainstream news outlets in the United States have a liberal bias.The Drudge Report is the most fair, balanced and centrist news outlet in the United States.
@incitebytes My IQ is 124 and to the point, your inability to reply to the substance of my original post shows me and everyone else that you know it to be true.
@incitebytes How about you comment on the topic of my post, it's been more than 24 hours and you still haven't made a valid point. And .. yeah sure, people with 140 IQ's always go around calling people asshole.. Your comments look more like 90 than 140 IQ.
@intrepidorato, Oh, what was your point? That a lone UCLA prof wrote a book claiming left-leaning media bias? And in your mind that's "proof"? And that Drudge is the most "fair and balanced" and centrist news outlet in America just because you proclaim it? Are you fucking kidding me (oh, I'm sorry, you wouldn't know that people with high IQ's (and a law degree) actually occasionally swear at lame brains like you). Give me solid scientific/empirical proof those premises are true and I'll respond.
@incitebytes No, people with high IQ's (like me) do not swear at people that they disagree with, even when they make foolish statements (like you). A person who swears immediately when faced with opposition is usually low brow and undeserving of debate. But since it is almost impossible to find an intelligent person who can debate against me I choose to put up with ignorant rants and try to guide you to a fruitful debate. Did you even google the book and read a quote or two? I doubt it.
@intrepidorator, I did google the book and its authors, and, lo and behold, in addition to the raft of sites criticizing their methodologies (e.g., bit(.)ly/nu6Q3C and bit(.)ly/nu6Q3C, remove parentheses), it turns out, surprise, that the authors, Groseclose and Milyo, had previously been on the payrolls of the three premier conservative think tanks in the U.S.: the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), The Heritage Foundation, and the Hoover Institution (bit(.)ly/nu6Q3C). Who coulda guessed?
@incitebytes I would have certainly expected him to be conservative, liberals are nowhere near as open minded as conservatives. The book points out that the liberal bias in the media actually distorts the human mind. Therefore, people who watch liberal media stop noticing the liberal slant because it causes them to begin thinking that way. I'm also not surprised that the liberals would criticize any study that points out liberal bias. Why would it surprise you?
@intrepidorator, Please, send me whatever you're smoking right away! "[L]iberals are nowhere near as open minded as conservatives"? Conservatives opposed ending slavery, opposed a women's right to vote, fought against the end of Jim Crow and against the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, opposed interracial marriage, oppose gays in the military and gay marriage, etc. Yeah, very open-minded! Where do you get all your goofy, grandiose pronouncements? Let me guess, the sun doesn't shine there.
@incitebytes Why do you insist on going back 200 years to find evidence of bad behavior. I'm talking about the conservatives of today that fight for you to keep the right to bear arms, Libs want to take that right away. This is not liberty. Libs want to forbid smoking in your own home, unless its pot of course, then its ok. This is not liberty. Liberals today are antiliberty. Can't you understand? or has the liberal media distoted your mind beyond the ability to reason?
@intrepidorator, Nice try at changing the subject. I recall the "discussion" (i.e., you pontificating ridiculously) was about "open mindedness." Gays in the military? Gay marriage? 200 years ago? How about right now? Interracial marriage and civil rights? About 50 years ago - the point is that conservatives have consistently been on the close-minded, prejudiced side of history when it comes to granting basic human rights. And you cite having a gun to shoot people as "open-mindedness"? Pathetic.
@intrepidorator, Nice try at changing the subject. I recall the "discussion" (i.e., you pontificating ridiculously) was about "open mindedness." Gays in the military? Gay marriage? 200 years ago? How about right now? Interracial marriage and civil rights? About 50 years ago - the point is that conservatives have consistently been on the close-minded, prejudiced side of history when it comes to granting basic human rights. And you cite having a gun to shoot people as "open-mindedness"? Pathetic.
@incitebytes Im not changing the subject, except to redirect you back to the subject of our discussion. The discussion is and always has been about LIBERTY. I guess your mind is wandering. LIBERTY is not defined as taking away peoples rights. This is what liberals want to do. Conservatives are the ones that want you to keep your right to bear arms. The right for you to decide whether or not to smoke in your own home. To choose whether or not to buy health insurance. These are a few examples..
@intrepidorator, Your comment that I responded to stated with the premise (in first sentence): "liberals are nowhere near as open minded as conservatives." NOWHERE in that comment did you mention "liberty" or "freedom". I responded by citing all the historical examples of conservatives being their usual close-minded selves in opposing every human/civil rights step forward. Then in your NEXT COMMENT responding to me you changed the subject to "libery"/"freedom." Get some intellectual integrity.
@intrepidorator, Some day goofs like you (if they get a brain transplant) will realize that the faux freedoms/liberties and government hatred your being sold is to get you to vote for tax cuts for millionaires/billionaires and corporate jet subsidies. When you go into that voting booth all focused on the right to kill yourself and others with cigarettes and assault rifles, they know they can count on you to pull the lever so they pay less and YOU pay more. Congrats on being made the fool!
@incitebytes FAUX freedoms? These are real freedoms, in fact the right to bear arms is the most important freedom we have. look at what happened to Germany after they took the guns away. Look at what Stalin was able to do after he disarmed his people. Just look at what the nut was able to do just a week ago in Norway, with their restrictive gun laws. That proves how misguided strict gun laws are.
@intrepidorator, Seriously, do you really think that an IQ of 124 makes you some sort of intellectual giant? Yeah, it may make you smarter than the average shlub, but I'd hardly run around beating my chest about it. It's painfully obvious by your over-formalized tone/style and your pompous/ludicrous pronouncements (Drudge is "fair and balanced" and high-IQ people don't swear) that you're not accustomed to how smart, well-educated people actually think/behave. I'm guessing college dweeb.
@incitebytes Actually I am a 6 year veteran of the Army, yes I did go to college, but that was decades ago. You might have "heard" me say the people with high IQ's don't swear" but I never said it. I said that people with high IQ's don't swear immediately at a person that they disagree with. I swaer in traffic, I swear if I cut my finger or stub my toe. I merely suggest that intelligent people do not swear as readily as you. It's probably a "vocabulary thing".
rachel you are a stupid uniformed twat, there are some names for you. are you to stupid to understand the concept of infiltration? you and shitty organizations like msnbc are clueless as to the real big picture of what is going on. when the constitution is on the verge of being tossed aside for sharia law one day maybe your old stupid twat brain will finally wake up
@cheesebubba, OH, NO! WE'VE BEEN INFILTRATED!! The right-wing-manufactured bogeymen (insert muslims, gays, angry blacks, socialists, communists, NWO, Planned Parenthood, ACORN, etc. ad nauseam) are coming to get us!!! Oh, Henny Penny, what will we ever do?!! OK, it's time get back on your meds.
@incitebytes WOW you must be an intellectual !! apparently you've found some new connection between being " muslim, gay, angry & black, a socialist, a communist, a planned parenthood advocate" and the others you lumped in together. so do tell us all, just what does subscribing to a religion that has no tolerance for anything but itself have to do with being ANY one of the groups you listed? i'll make it easy for you, JUST pick one. i was pretty sure being gay or black wasn't a choice.
@cheesebubba, Are you kidding me? Do you live under a rock? Are you really that clueless? Do you ever watch/listen to any of the constant right-wing propaganda (aka Fox News and the right-wing mediasphere), who everyday pound their ADHD dummies with fear of the "other" (muslims, gays, angry blacks, socialists, communists, NWO, Planned Parenthood, ACORN) in order to get them to vote for economic policies that have nothing to do with their lives. What part of that is so difficult to understand?
@incitebytes hey buddy, first of all o'reilly is an idiot THAT is without doubt, however rachel maddow, has her head up her uninformed twat. and BUDDY, WHY do you keep lumping "gays, and angry blacks" in with muslims. apparently you need to be told twice, being gay and or black is not a choice, being a muslim is. 10 years from now when they start making bigger challenges perhaps babbling that the constitution is anti islamic, maybe YOU and rachel can then pull your heads out of your asses
@cheesebubba, Don't flatter yourself, I'm not your "buddy" (my friends have to be able to think, which rules you out). Look, I sincerely feel sorry for you. You are ONE DIM BULB! I wasn't lumping them together because they share any characteristics, I was using them as examples of groups/people that Fox and the right wing like to flog/use to scare people into voting conservative/Republican. Somewhere, a village is looking for its idiot - please, save them the trouble and tell them where you are.
@incitebytes well i don't even INSINCERELY feel sorry for YOU. as a matter of fact i feel nothing for you. the only thing i "feel" for you, is i feel that YOU are wasting oxygen. rather than babbling on about things you obviously know nothing about why don't you try doing a little investigating into the true nature of islam, and then you will see what a shitty religion it truly is. as a matter of fact, why don't you think of reverting to islam they could use another imbecile like you
@cheesebubba, Actually, I think the verb/phrase you were looking for is "converting to islam." With some work, English could become your native tongue.
@incitebytes wow buddy thanks! you have just shown that you know less than nothing about islam. my use of the word REVERTING was intentional. islam in their ignorance and arrogance believes that all including, hindus catholics and jews,were born to islam, but through life, or parents or any other circumstances were taken away. THEREFORE one REVERTS to islam. do a little research, and until then, shut the fuck up you imbecile, or pop on down to your local mosque. they could use you.
@cheesebubba, Look, @CheesyBubba, you're a full-blown fucking lunatic. Do everyone a favor and get back on your meds and find your way back to the group home.
@incitebytes is that the best you've got? i tell you facts and this is all you're capable of coming back with? thanks for posting your own words, THEY alone show you to be the imbecile that you obviously are. in addition to pummeling you with words i truly wish i could get you in the boxing ring all to myself as well. that would complete your education. now go hop on down to your local mosque, they're always in need of uneducated imbeciles such as yourself.
@cheesebubba, Here's your idea of "pummeling [me] with words": I make merciless fun of your impaired intellect and your Big Response is to tell me my ancestors were "islamic" and that I "reverted" to Islam? Never mind that is laugh-out-loud insane (that term is "Abrahamic" (of Abraham) not "islamic" fool, look it up). You strike me as the classic, uneducated product of intra-family fucking from bumpkin holler where the only things getting "pummeled" are close relatives with your flaccid dick.
@incitebytes you stupid imbecile if you actually even knew the slightest about islam you'd know people don't CONVERT to it, they REVERT to it. buddy i'd take care of you like the little scrawny pussy you are in person, as far as MY "flaccid dick" goes perhaps i'll look you up and feed it to whatever passes for a girlfriend you presently have and then tell you about it to your little pussy uneducated face. and i'd do that with my hands behind my back. THAT's what i think of you
Fox's high ratings isn't exactly a good thing. what they see are "look at our ratings! woohoo!" but what other, intelligent people see are "look how many idiots, Republicans and right-wing screwballs there are around here..."
This Maddow broad barely gets one third the views O'Reilly gets. MSNBC ratings are a JOKE. "FOX News lies..." yada, yada, yada. Since when is the libtards on MSNBC "fair and balanced" when reporting the news? There's a good reason why MSNBC's ratings are in the tank...
@pretorious700 Actually, there's a major difference. Maddow uses facts and logic and uses her inside voice. O'Rielly is a bully who uses rhetoric and screaming to force his opinion on others.
When I point out logical fallacies (which I'm starting to do - 'cause I love to show definitively how reasoning can go wrong), I usually get looked at like I've got lobsters comin' outa my ears - nobody gets it...
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
She is stupid. She made a non-sequitur argument with the Shark Week. Obviously O'reilly was using an Ad Populum, but there's a lot to be said for that kind of arguing. It's what our political system is based off of. Why don't you go play softball you dyke?
@vhsballin31 How about you just shove that bat right up your arse. And no, a lot of people believed the world was flat at one point, they were all wrong weren't they? Popularity doesn't denote accuracy.
@RaptorClaws24 As popularity may not necessarily denote accuracy, neither does having a female first name denote femininity. Speaking of which, I wouldn't toss around the suggestion of having a ball-bat shoved up an arse to loosely. Rachel is rumored to have a schvugie that would shame Mr. Ed and, according to Keith Olbermann, loves to employ it in the manner in which you suggested.
@TaInTeDlYnX It doesnt really matter if they are the same party, there is always going to be tension between the president and congress on some issues regardless of party dominance.
hmm, wow rachel..this sure is news, telling me about a different news station. and speaking of Ad hominem..you mean like MSNBC's the Ed Show having a segment called "psycho talk"...nice try little boy maddow
@upinya25 I agree with you, every time I take a glance at this Rachel Maddow's show all she talks about is fox news. She is hard to watch due to the fact that she's so horrid to look at. She should of been on radio, not tv.
@TaInTeDlYnX YOU COMPLETELY AVOIDED fiscal policy & banking regulations which defines WHY Canada and Australia are doing fine and why AMERICA IS A MESS! When the debtor defaults on an interest payment, the creditor can file a claim for breach of contract to cease title of the residence in order to recover their capital. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae went bankrupt b/c of subprime lending which caused the lack of liquidity in the market = causing the recession. USA needs COMMON SENSE REGULATIONS!!!
@TaInTeDlYnX your reply is exactly the problem with America - one party vs another. It's called COMMON SENSE. Canada and Australia did NOT need to bail out their banks because they had sound banking regulations. Australia had an oil spill - within hours boats were helping to stop the oil spill. Obama had 13 countries offering to help - he said NO to all of them. Result - Americans suffer. G8 Summit told Obama stop spending - he says NO. Even Canadian Liberal Party knows fiscal responsibility.
Rachel Maddow is 100% correct conservative in general do that kind of stuff. They want people to fear blacks are going to take from them so the racist will conitue to vote for them.
@TaInTeDlYnX That's great that we agree that Fox is right wing and MSNBC is a left wing media source.
Obama's approval rating is now below 41% because Americans at large disagree with his POLICY and not because of his RACE.
If you honestly think that America's 65% DISAPPROVAL of Obamacare, American public's outrage over Obama's out-of-control spending and his pathetic lack of response in the oil spill ....... is because he is half black ..... then YOU need help.
There is no question that Fox's hosts are slanted to the right. HOWEVER MSNBC is ridiculously in the tank for Obama. So much that Saturday Night Live and Stephen Colbert made fun of this "news" station. If someone disagrees with Obama ..... the left wing media tries to spin it as "racism" instead of simply disagreeing with Obama's "policy". John Stewart even made fun of the left by having a black guy on and swipe the "race card" as if it was a credit card.
they are both immature. aren't they a little old for high school drama? who cares! What matters is the issues..I could care less listening to her annoying long rant against Bill and vice versa...seriously grow up and move on. nobody watches the news to hear this petty drama.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@monitchka Why on earth is it immature for Rachel to defend herself against unfair attacks? She is doing it in a humourous way aswell. Bill O is a fucking idiot and we need people to take him down again and again.
@punkmanjon it's immature because it's on a news program not on the phone with her friend..she should be above his remarks by ignoring them and move on...people are supposed to watch the news for actual news not drama between anchors.
@monitchka It is not immature to take on a bully. Bill O'Reilly is a bully. Bullies are bullies only because people don't stand up to them. Rachel stood up to him in the most mature and intelligent way possible--by teaching him how to maturely debate.
@Shamborn I think she could have made a more profound impact by ignoring him and taking the high road. He wanted this attention and she gave it to him. I don't believe she handled it in the best way. I found it very irritating. I don't like to hear people complain about each other, not matter who is wrong or right.
@monitchka Have you ever watched "The Rachel Maddow Show"? Maddow is among the most mature people on television.
Fox News was engaging in a particularly insidious appeal to some of the worst motivations of the channel's viewership. And, Bill O'Reilly wasn't the only commentator that took part in this effort. Does anyone remember Glenn Beck saying that the President has "a deep-seated hatred of white people"? Someone needs to call that stuff out for what it is!
@CommunityBuildersSB that's fine. I'm sure she is mature, with exception to this incident. 2 wrongs don't make a right. just because Bill acts immature, does not mean she should sink down to his level and retaliate. it would have been better if she just ignored him. this is my opinion. when I watch the news, I don't want to hear this drama crap. if you want to hear it, good for you.
@monitchka Is criticizing attempts by certain conservative political commentators to divide the country along racial lines and to pit one group against another in order to achieve some political goal "retaliation"?
Does it help the country to have people running around Fox News saying blacks are trying to get the white people's money?
If I didn't see this video, I might never have known the extent of O'Reilly's rhetoric, but, since I have, the racial games being played at Fox do alarm me.
@CommunityBuildersSB I don't care about her drama with Bill. like I said before, if you like it..good for you. I am not interested in listening to her defend herself from Bill's petty attacks on live tv. I want the facts and that's it. the tv is full of drama on reality shows, everywhere. the news is one place it doesn't belong. you're not going to change my opinion, so it's pointless to keep commenting me. not everybody is going to always agree with your opinions. just let it go.
@monitchka Unfortunately it is essential to expose fox news and people like O'Reilly as liars and idiots. I think she did this piece not because she's petty but because it's part of a greater good/need.
@monitchka this all went clear over your head. this rant isnt 'against bill', it is against the logical fallacies bill and fox employ to deliberately misrepresent news to fit an agenda that has made him and his plutocratic paymasters rich at the expense of average americans.
you're right to say 'what matters is [sic] the issues'. that is why maddow is pushing for an honest depiction of reality, because fox's lies distort public perception among electorate on the issues
@manonthemount I understand. look, I don't like fox news or Bill either. I also don't need to hear about it from her to know all the flaws of fox news. but I think in this particular instance Rachel is more upset because he made it personal by bad mouthing her so she was striking back at him in a personal way as well. It's really just a matter of preference for the viewer. Some people don't mind but I just want to hear what's going on in the world without commentary. It's hard to find that now.
Right BIll, "not a shred of evidence"! Not one little shred. You have been taken to school. Now, try to learn something from it. Grow up. Stop calling people names when you disagree with them like some 5th grade playground bully. Your insults and labeling, not to mention your proclivity to use little more than logical fallacies, speak volumes about your level of maturity and integrity. You are defining yourself with your mudslinging and callous hubris, and it ain't a pretty picture.
Rachel is wrong. O'Reilly is a guy in the right but at least he has some logic.
Rachel in the other hand is so crazy, I can't believe she is not aware of that.
If she want to be listened by other people (not just crazy liberals) she should start having more normal people in her show. She has become as fanatic and craze as Limbaugh.
RACHEL PLEASE!! COME TO THE LIGHT, LEAVE THE SIDE OF HATE
@edwardny1 What the hell are you talking about? She just calmly stated cold hard facts. How on earth could anybody watch this and say that Bill O'reilly is correct? Can you honestly give me one example as to why Rachel is "crazy?" And leave the side of hate? Conservatives are known for their hatred of non-white people, non-christian people and homosexuals. What are liberals known for? Hating the haters, and maybe loving everybody else too much.
@pillsome195 It surprises me how inside in the box you are, but I know the way you can understand why people see the Democrats as the party of hate. It's very simple, just write 10 lines explaining what kind of man is President Bush (use as many adjectives as you can), then put President Obama instead. Read it aloud. Last think.
@Edwardbrooklyn What are you talking about? Ok: A conservative network is clearly being prejudiced. Yes, the liberal side of things isn't perfect either, but conservatives aren't fun loving. They do things out of cruelty and hatred. Leave presidents out of it. I'm talking about the two collectives of people. One is generally loving of others and one is hating of others. Can you honestly say "conservatives love all people?"
@gossieuk Yeah,ya dopey little cheese twit - and smart people readily resort to the Daily Star and the Sun for their info. That's why every Brit with an IQ greater than their hat size moved off that shithole island years ago. Carry on, son.
I hope Bill O'Reilly realize that people watch his show to laugh at him.
Ravensteinzh 1 month ago
I learned all this in my Logic class and last semester in Philosophy.
[insert ad-hominem].
sonicfanrs 2 months ago
Oreilly is a CUNT!
deeppurple28 3 months ago
She speaks eloquently enough and is funny enough for me to go along with her rant about Bill O'Relliy. But, i can sort of see why both their shows have low ratings if all they do is bitch about each other. Still though, team Rachel Maddows all the way.
lilteenyweenytuna 5 months ago
God, I hate Bill O'reilly. He is the most annoying arrogant asshole
justjulie37 6 months ago
All Major News Outlets Have Left-Leaning Bias that ‘Distorts’ Minds. A professor from UCLA has just published a book that exposes the left wing bias in news organizations. The book is called Left Turn - How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind. In the book Groseclose states that- All mainstream news outlets in the United States have a liberal bias.The Drudge Report is the most fair, balanced and centrist news outlet in the United States.
intrepidorator 7 months ago
@intrepidorator, Let me know when to stop laughing.
incitebytes 7 months ago
@incitebytes You can stop laughing when your IQ gets above 100.. lol...lmao@ you
intrepidorator 7 months ago
@intrepidorator, Why would you want me to smarter than you?
incitebytes 7 months ago
@incitebytes No chance of that happening, I was trying to get you up to average intelligence.
intrepidorator 7 months ago
@intrepidorator, As I said, why would you want me to be smarter than you (obviously) are?
incitebytes 7 months ago
@incitebytes My IQ is 124 and to the point, your inability to reply to the substance of my original post shows me and everyone else that you know it to be true.
intrepidorator 7 months ago
Comment removed
incitebytes 7 months ago
@intrepidorator, Add 16 points to yours and a much better education and you have my profile. Now, pick a topic asshole and let's debate.
incitebytes 7 months ago
@incitebytes How about you comment on the topic of my post, it's been more than 24 hours and you still haven't made a valid point. And .. yeah sure, people with 140 IQ's always go around calling people asshole.. Your comments look more like 90 than 140 IQ.
intrepidorator 7 months ago
@intrepidorato, Oh, what was your point? That a lone UCLA prof wrote a book claiming left-leaning media bias? And in your mind that's "proof"? And that Drudge is the most "fair and balanced" and centrist news outlet in America just because you proclaim it? Are you fucking kidding me (oh, I'm sorry, you wouldn't know that people with high IQ's (and a law degree) actually occasionally swear at lame brains like you). Give me solid scientific/empirical proof those premises are true and I'll respond.
incitebytes 7 months ago
@incitebytes No, people with high IQ's (like me) do not swear at people that they disagree with, even when they make foolish statements (like you). A person who swears immediately when faced with opposition is usually low brow and undeserving of debate. But since it is almost impossible to find an intelligent person who can debate against me I choose to put up with ignorant rants and try to guide you to a fruitful debate. Did you even google the book and read a quote or two? I doubt it.
intrepidorator 7 months ago
@intrepidorator, I did google the book and its authors, and, lo and behold, in addition to the raft of sites criticizing their methodologies (e.g., bit(.)ly/nu6Q3C and bit(.)ly/nu6Q3C, remove parentheses), it turns out, surprise, that the authors, Groseclose and Milyo, had previously been on the payrolls of the three premier conservative think tanks in the U.S.: the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), The Heritage Foundation, and the Hoover Institution (bit(.)ly/nu6Q3C). Who coulda guessed?
incitebytes 7 months ago
@incitebytes I would have certainly expected him to be conservative, liberals are nowhere near as open minded as conservatives. The book points out that the liberal bias in the media actually distorts the human mind. Therefore, people who watch liberal media stop noticing the liberal slant because it causes them to begin thinking that way. I'm also not surprised that the liberals would criticize any study that points out liberal bias. Why would it surprise you?
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator, Please, send me whatever you're smoking right away! "[L]iberals are nowhere near as open minded as conservatives"? Conservatives opposed ending slavery, opposed a women's right to vote, fought against the end of Jim Crow and against the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts, opposed interracial marriage, oppose gays in the military and gay marriage, etc. Yeah, very open-minded! Where do you get all your goofy, grandiose pronouncements? Let me guess, the sun doesn't shine there.
incitebytes 6 months ago
@incitebytes Why do you insist on going back 200 years to find evidence of bad behavior. I'm talking about the conservatives of today that fight for you to keep the right to bear arms, Libs want to take that right away. This is not liberty. Libs want to forbid smoking in your own home, unless its pot of course, then its ok. This is not liberty. Liberals today are antiliberty. Can't you understand? or has the liberal media distoted your mind beyond the ability to reason?
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator, Nice try at changing the subject. I recall the "discussion" (i.e., you pontificating ridiculously) was about "open mindedness." Gays in the military? Gay marriage? 200 years ago? How about right now? Interracial marriage and civil rights? About 50 years ago - the point is that conservatives have consistently been on the close-minded, prejudiced side of history when it comes to granting basic human rights. And you cite having a gun to shoot people as "open-mindedness"? Pathetic.
incitebytes 6 months ago
@intrepidorator, Nice try at changing the subject. I recall the "discussion" (i.e., you pontificating ridiculously) was about "open mindedness." Gays in the military? Gay marriage? 200 years ago? How about right now? Interracial marriage and civil rights? About 50 years ago - the point is that conservatives have consistently been on the close-minded, prejudiced side of history when it comes to granting basic human rights. And you cite having a gun to shoot people as "open-mindedness"? Pathetic.
incitebytes 6 months ago
@incitebytes Im not changing the subject, except to redirect you back to the subject of our discussion. The discussion is and always has been about LIBERTY. I guess your mind is wandering. LIBERTY is not defined as taking away peoples rights. This is what liberals want to do. Conservatives are the ones that want you to keep your right to bear arms. The right for you to decide whether or not to smoke in your own home. To choose whether or not to buy health insurance. These are a few examples..
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator, Your comment that I responded to stated with the premise (in first sentence): "liberals are nowhere near as open minded as conservatives." NOWHERE in that comment did you mention "liberty" or "freedom". I responded by citing all the historical examples of conservatives being their usual close-minded selves in opposing every human/civil rights step forward. Then in your NEXT COMMENT responding to me you changed the subject to "libery"/"freedom." Get some intellectual integrity.
incitebytes 6 months ago
@intrepidorator, Some day goofs like you (if they get a brain transplant) will realize that the faux freedoms/liberties and government hatred your being sold is to get you to vote for tax cuts for millionaires/billionaires and corporate jet subsidies. When you go into that voting booth all focused on the right to kill yourself and others with cigarettes and assault rifles, they know they can count on you to pull the lever so they pay less and YOU pay more. Congrats on being made the fool!
incitebytes 6 months ago
@incitebytes FAUX freedoms? These are real freedoms, in fact the right to bear arms is the most important freedom we have. look at what happened to Germany after they took the guns away. Look at what Stalin was able to do after he disarmed his people. Just look at what the nut was able to do just a week ago in Norway, with their restrictive gun laws. That proves how misguided strict gun laws are.
intrepidorator 6 months ago
@intrepidorator, Seriously, do you really think that an IQ of 124 makes you some sort of intellectual giant? Yeah, it may make you smarter than the average shlub, but I'd hardly run around beating my chest about it. It's painfully obvious by your over-formalized tone/style and your pompous/ludicrous pronouncements (Drudge is "fair and balanced" and high-IQ people don't swear) that you're not accustomed to how smart, well-educated people actually think/behave. I'm guessing college dweeb.
incitebytes 7 months ago
@incitebytes Actually I am a 6 year veteran of the Army, yes I did go to college, but that was decades ago. You might have "heard" me say the people with high IQ's don't swear" but I never said it. I said that people with high IQ's don't swear immediately at a person that they disagree with. I swaer in traffic, I swear if I cut my finger or stub my toe. I merely suggest that intelligent people do not swear as readily as you. It's probably a "vocabulary thing".
intrepidorator 6 months ago
Most of what Bill reported on has been proven true, and Maddow just lies her way around the story.
Wheres your Facts Racheal ?
53dumey 8 months ago
This sounds like a YouTube pissing contest, just report on how FOX spins stories.
Venaloid 9 months ago
Yay for Rachel. I'm glad this issue is resounding with some part of her 1%. Love her!
Lenora1854 10 months ago 2
rachel you are a stupid uniformed twat, there are some names for you. are you to stupid to understand the concept of infiltration? you and shitty organizations like msnbc are clueless as to the real big picture of what is going on. when the constitution is on the verge of being tossed aside for sharia law one day maybe your old stupid twat brain will finally wake up
cheesebubba 11 months ago 2
@cheesebubba, OH, NO! WE'VE BEEN INFILTRATED!! The right-wing-manufactured bogeymen (insert muslims, gays, angry blacks, socialists, communists, NWO, Planned Parenthood, ACORN, etc. ad nauseam) are coming to get us!!! Oh, Henny Penny, what will we ever do?!! OK, it's time get back on your meds.
incitebytes 11 months ago
@incitebytes WOW you must be an intellectual !! apparently you've found some new connection between being " muslim, gay, angry & black, a socialist, a communist, a planned parenthood advocate" and the others you lumped in together. so do tell us all, just what does subscribing to a religion that has no tolerance for anything but itself have to do with being ANY one of the groups you listed? i'll make it easy for you, JUST pick one. i was pretty sure being gay or black wasn't a choice.
cheesebubba 11 months ago
@cheesebubba, Are you kidding me? Do you live under a rock? Are you really that clueless? Do you ever watch/listen to any of the constant right-wing propaganda (aka Fox News and the right-wing mediasphere), who everyday pound their ADHD dummies with fear of the "other" (muslims, gays, angry blacks, socialists, communists, NWO, Planned Parenthood, ACORN) in order to get them to vote for economic policies that have nothing to do with their lives. What part of that is so difficult to understand?
incitebytes 11 months ago
@incitebytes hey buddy, first of all o'reilly is an idiot THAT is without doubt, however rachel maddow, has her head up her uninformed twat. and BUDDY, WHY do you keep lumping "gays, and angry blacks" in with muslims. apparently you need to be told twice, being gay and or black is not a choice, being a muslim is. 10 years from now when they start making bigger challenges perhaps babbling that the constitution is anti islamic, maybe YOU and rachel can then pull your heads out of your asses
cheesebubba 11 months ago
@cheesebubba, Don't flatter yourself, I'm not your "buddy" (my friends have to be able to think, which rules you out). Look, I sincerely feel sorry for you. You are ONE DIM BULB! I wasn't lumping them together because they share any characteristics, I was using them as examples of groups/people that Fox and the right wing like to flog/use to scare people into voting conservative/Republican. Somewhere, a village is looking for its idiot - please, save them the trouble and tell them where you are.
incitebytes 11 months ago
@incitebytes well i don't even INSINCERELY feel sorry for YOU. as a matter of fact i feel nothing for you. the only thing i "feel" for you, is i feel that YOU are wasting oxygen. rather than babbling on about things you obviously know nothing about why don't you try doing a little investigating into the true nature of islam, and then you will see what a shitty religion it truly is. as a matter of fact, why don't you think of reverting to islam they could use another imbecile like you
cheesebubba 11 months ago
@cheesebubba, Actually, I think the verb/phrase you were looking for is "converting to islam." With some work, English could become your native tongue.
incitebytes 11 months ago
@incitebytes wow buddy thanks! you have just shown that you know less than nothing about islam. my use of the word REVERTING was intentional. islam in their ignorance and arrogance believes that all including, hindus catholics and jews,were born to islam, but through life, or parents or any other circumstances were taken away. THEREFORE one REVERTS to islam. do a little research, and until then, shut the fuck up you imbecile, or pop on down to your local mosque. they could use you.
cheesebubba 11 months ago
@cheesebubba, Look, @CheesyBubba, you're a full-blown fucking lunatic. Do everyone a favor and get back on your meds and find your way back to the group home.
incitebytes 11 months ago
@incitebytes is that the best you've got? i tell you facts and this is all you're capable of coming back with? thanks for posting your own words, THEY alone show you to be the imbecile that you obviously are. in addition to pummeling you with words i truly wish i could get you in the boxing ring all to myself as well. that would complete your education. now go hop on down to your local mosque, they're always in need of uneducated imbeciles such as yourself.
cheesebubba 11 months ago
Comment removed
incitebytes 11 months ago
@cheesebubba, Here's your idea of "pummeling [me] with words": I make merciless fun of your impaired intellect and your Big Response is to tell me my ancestors were "islamic" and that I "reverted" to Islam? Never mind that is laugh-out-loud insane (that term is "Abrahamic" (of Abraham) not "islamic" fool, look it up). You strike me as the classic, uneducated product of intra-family fucking from bumpkin holler where the only things getting "pummeled" are close relatives with your flaccid dick.
incitebytes 11 months ago
@incitebytes you stupid imbecile if you actually even knew the slightest about islam you'd know people don't CONVERT to it, they REVERT to it. buddy i'd take care of you like the little scrawny pussy you are in person, as far as MY "flaccid dick" goes perhaps i'll look you up and feed it to whatever passes for a girlfriend you presently have and then tell you about it to your little pussy uneducated face. and i'd do that with my hands behind my back. THAT's what i think of you
cheesebubba 11 months ago
Fox's high ratings isn't exactly a good thing. what they see are "look at our ratings! woohoo!" but what other, intelligent people see are "look how many idiots, Republicans and right-wing screwballs there are around here..."
Stevie2Sxc 11 months ago
This Maddow broad barely gets one third the views O'Reilly gets. MSNBC ratings are a JOKE. "FOX News lies..." yada, yada, yada. Since when is the libtards on MSNBC "fair and balanced" when reporting the news? There's a good reason why MSNBC's ratings are in the tank...
acrovader 1 year ago
@acrovader, "This Maddow broad"? Wow, who the fuck talks like that? What happened -- your time machine get stuck in the '60s?
incitebytes 11 months ago
Keep up the good work Rachel Maddow. You make people think twice about casual consideration of facts
time2learnnow 1 year ago
Racel Maddow and Bill O'Reilly have way more in common than they have differences.
Both are pedantic, egotistical idiots with bad haircuts.
pretorious700 1 year ago
@pretorious700 Actually, there's a major difference. Maddow uses facts and logic and uses her inside voice. O'Rielly is a bully who uses rhetoric and screaming to force his opinion on others.
SpazzzDog 1 year ago
Is it weird that I like O'Reilly and Maddow?
Patcannistan 1 year ago
@Patcannistan, Yes.
incitebytes 1 year ago
Rachel, you are incredible. I love your intelligence and wit. You are one of my top favorite news reporters!
swfrances 1 year ago
Rachel needs cock
Trader5822 1 year ago
@Trader5822 Just because she doesn't want your cock doesn't mean she needs cock.
thedocumentarian 1 year ago
@thedocumentarian - I wouldn't fuck that skank.
Trader5822 1 year ago
When I point out logical fallacies (which I'm starting to do - 'cause I love to show definitively how reasoning can go wrong), I usually get looked at like I've got lobsters comin' outa my ears - nobody gets it...
steveb0503 1 year ago
Now all someone has to do is depict all the bullshit MSNBC shows.
bluelite7x 1 year ago
Facts from MSNBC?!
ROFLMAO!
bluelite7x 1 year ago 2
@bluelite7x
facts from FOX?!
ROFLMAOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mikeybetts 6 months ago
Damn ! SHE OWNED O RIELLY !!! YAAHHH !!!
SpearofDestiny0 1 year ago 17
This has been flagged as spam show
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
vechorik 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Argumentum ad Hominem
guudcadee 1 year ago
She is stupid. She made a non-sequitur argument with the Shark Week. Obviously O'reilly was using an Ad Populum, but there's a lot to be said for that kind of arguing. It's what our political system is based off of. Why don't you go play softball you dyke?
vhsballin31 1 year ago
@vhsballin31 How about you just shove that bat right up your arse. And no, a lot of people believed the world was flat at one point, they were all wrong weren't they? Popularity doesn't denote accuracy.
RaptorClaws24 1 year ago
@RaptorClaws24 As popularity may not necessarily denote accuracy, neither does having a female first name denote femininity. Speaking of which, I wouldn't toss around the suggestion of having a ball-bat shoved up an arse to loosely. Rachel is rumored to have a schvugie that would shame Mr. Ed and, according to Keith Olbermann, loves to employ it in the manner in which you suggested.
hansboofer 1 year ago 2
@TaInTeDlYnX It doesnt really matter if they are the same party, there is always going to be tension between the president and congress on some issues regardless of party dominance.
xXxSHOOPIExXx 1 year ago
@TaInTeDlYnX Presidents dont have control of anything its all congress.
xXxSHOOPIExXx 1 year ago
Commentator News has become a joke. It is not even news.
xXxSHOOPIExXx 1 year ago
hmm, wow rachel..this sure is news, telling me about a different news station. and speaking of Ad hominem..you mean like MSNBC's the Ed Show having a segment called "psycho talk"...nice try little boy maddow
upinya25 1 year ago
@upinya25 I agree with you, every time I take a glance at this Rachel Maddow's show all she talks about is fox news. She is hard to watch due to the fact that she's so horrid to look at. She should of been on radio, not tv.
xXxSHOOPIExXx 1 year ago
@TaInTeDlYnX YOU COMPLETELY AVOIDED fiscal policy & banking regulations which defines WHY Canada and Australia are doing fine and why AMERICA IS A MESS! When the debtor defaults on an interest payment, the creditor can file a claim for breach of contract to cease title of the residence in order to recover their capital. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae went bankrupt b/c of subprime lending which caused the lack of liquidity in the market = causing the recession. USA needs COMMON SENSE REGULATIONS!!!
Cowboy0077 1 year ago
@TaInTeDlYnX your reply is exactly the problem with America - one party vs another. It's called COMMON SENSE. Canada and Australia did NOT need to bail out their banks because they had sound banking regulations. Australia had an oil spill - within hours boats were helping to stop the oil spill. Obama had 13 countries offering to help - he said NO to all of them. Result - Americans suffer. G8 Summit told Obama stop spending - he says NO. Even Canadian Liberal Party knows fiscal responsibility.
Cowboy0077 1 year ago
Rachel Maddow is 100% correct conservative in general do that kind of stuff. They want people to fear blacks are going to take from them so the racist will conitue to vote for them.
thecaliforniaknight 1 year ago
Rachel Maddow is a funny looking dude.
visionfirst1970 1 year ago
Thumbs up if Omer Bhatti @lilmoonboi sent you here..! :)
TH4JBndMJ 1 year ago 5
hahaha
lollipopyumness 1 year ago
You go girl!
Darcsied27 1 year ago
where are your facts that fox news is a racist enterprise?
wyattakawarp 1 year ago
@wyattakawarp Didnt you just watch the video? She just gave you the facts.
punkmanjon 1 year ago
@TaInTeDlYnX That's great that we agree that Fox is right wing and MSNBC is a left wing media source.
Obama's approval rating is now below 41% because Americans at large disagree with his POLICY and not because of his RACE.
If you honestly think that America's 65% DISAPPROVAL of Obamacare, American public's outrage over Obama's out-of-control spending and his pathetic lack of response in the oil spill ....... is because he is half black ..... then YOU need help.
Cowboy0077 1 year ago
Who is this 15 year old boy???
There is no question that Fox's hosts are slanted to the right. HOWEVER MSNBC is ridiculously in the tank for Obama. So much that Saturday Night Live and Stephen Colbert made fun of this "news" station. If someone disagrees with Obama ..... the left wing media tries to spin it as "racism" instead of simply disagreeing with Obama's "policy". John Stewart even made fun of the left by having a black guy on and swipe the "race card" as if it was a credit card.
Cowboy0077 1 year ago
She's still on the air? I thought her ratings were so bad she'd be gone by now.
razerfish 1 year ago
they are both immature. aren't they a little old for high school drama? who cares! What matters is the issues..I could care less listening to her annoying long rant against Bill and vice versa...seriously grow up and move on. nobody watches the news to hear this petty drama.
monitchka 1 year ago 21
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@monitchka Why on earth is it immature for Rachel to defend herself against unfair attacks? She is doing it in a humourous way aswell. Bill O is a fucking idiot and we need people to take him down again and again.
punkmanjon 1 year ago
@punkmanjon it's immature because it's on a news program not on the phone with her friend..she should be above his remarks by ignoring them and move on...people are supposed to watch the news for actual news not drama between anchors.
monitchka 1 year ago 5
@monitchka But its not a news programme its an opinion programme ABOUT the news. Plus anything which show Bill O up for the liar he is is good.
punkmanjon 1 year ago
@monitchka It is not immature to take on a bully. Bill O'Reilly is a bully. Bullies are bullies only because people don't stand up to them. Rachel stood up to him in the most mature and intelligent way possible--by teaching him how to maturely debate.
Shamborn 1 year ago
@Shamborn I think she could have made a more profound impact by ignoring him and taking the high road. He wanted this attention and she gave it to him. I don't believe she handled it in the best way. I found it very irritating. I don't like to hear people complain about each other, not matter who is wrong or right.
monitchka 1 year ago
@monitchka Have you ever watched "The Rachel Maddow Show"? Maddow is among the most mature people on television.
Fox News was engaging in a particularly insidious appeal to some of the worst motivations of the channel's viewership. And, Bill O'Reilly wasn't the only commentator that took part in this effort. Does anyone remember Glenn Beck saying that the President has "a deep-seated hatred of white people"? Someone needs to call that stuff out for what it is!
CommunityBuildersSB 6 months ago
@CommunityBuildersSB that's fine. I'm sure she is mature, with exception to this incident. 2 wrongs don't make a right. just because Bill acts immature, does not mean she should sink down to his level and retaliate. it would have been better if she just ignored him. this is my opinion. when I watch the news, I don't want to hear this drama crap. if you want to hear it, good for you.
monitchka 6 months ago
@monitchka Is criticizing attempts by certain conservative political commentators to divide the country along racial lines and to pit one group against another in order to achieve some political goal "retaliation"?
Does it help the country to have people running around Fox News saying blacks are trying to get the white people's money?
If I didn't see this video, I might never have known the extent of O'Reilly's rhetoric, but, since I have, the racial games being played at Fox do alarm me.
CommunityBuildersSB 6 months ago
@CommunityBuildersSB I don't care about her drama with Bill. like I said before, if you like it..good for you. I am not interested in listening to her defend herself from Bill's petty attacks on live tv. I want the facts and that's it. the tv is full of drama on reality shows, everywhere. the news is one place it doesn't belong. you're not going to change my opinion, so it's pointless to keep commenting me. not everybody is going to always agree with your opinions. just let it go.
monitchka 6 months ago
@monitchka Unfortunately it is essential to expose fox news and people like O'Reilly as liars and idiots. I think she did this piece not because she's petty but because it's part of a greater good/need.
rex786 6 months ago
@monitchka this all went clear over your head. this rant isnt 'against bill', it is against the logical fallacies bill and fox employ to deliberately misrepresent news to fit an agenda that has made him and his plutocratic paymasters rich at the expense of average americans.
you're right to say 'what matters is [sic] the issues'. that is why maddow is pushing for an honest depiction of reality, because fox's lies distort public perception among electorate on the issues
manonthemount 5 months ago
@manonthemount I understand. look, I don't like fox news or Bill either. I also don't need to hear about it from her to know all the flaws of fox news. but I think in this particular instance Rachel is more upset because he made it personal by bad mouthing her so she was striking back at him in a personal way as well. It's really just a matter of preference for the viewer. Some people don't mind but I just want to hear what's going on in the world without commentary. It's hard to find that now.
monitchka 5 months ago 3
Rachel keep doing your thing.... Bill 'O FuckFace isn't worth your time
sounddepth 1 year ago
THERE IS TREACHERY AFOOT AT FOX! TREACHERY!
biggmayne1 1 year ago
Maddow one of the best!! Keith too!!!
88donja 1 year ago
I fucking love her. Fuck Fox news.
rawfannation101 1 year ago 2
lol i cant believe anyone would air this, i wish news reporters had childish arguments on tv in the uk
woddaheck 1 year ago
Bill O' riley is a racists pervert simple and plain
Solotv84 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
rachel should do porn.
bLacksheep988 1 year ago
Right BIll, "not a shred of evidence"! Not one little shred. You have been taken to school. Now, try to learn something from it. Grow up. Stop calling people names when you disagree with them like some 5th grade playground bully. Your insults and labeling, not to mention your proclivity to use little more than logical fallacies, speak volumes about your level of maturity and integrity. You are defining yourself with your mudslinging and callous hubris, and it ain't a pretty picture.
utuber46 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
utuber46 1 year ago
Here is a better example --> Rachel Maddow lives in a Sesame Street world where NO ONE IS WHITE, EVERYONE IS GAY, AND EVERYTHING IS FREE.
Stwatubes 1 year ago
I think he's more Ad Assinign
brghtsd1 1 year ago
Rachel is wrong. O'Reilly is a guy in the right but at least he has some logic.
Rachel in the other hand is so crazy, I can't believe she is not aware of that.
If she want to be listened by other people (not just crazy liberals) she should start having more normal people in her show. She has become as fanatic and craze as Limbaugh.
RACHEL PLEASE!! COME TO THE LIGHT, LEAVE THE SIDE OF HATE
edwardny1 1 year ago
@edwardny1 What the hell are you talking about? She just calmly stated cold hard facts. How on earth could anybody watch this and say that Bill O'reilly is correct? Can you honestly give me one example as to why Rachel is "crazy?" And leave the side of hate? Conservatives are known for their hatred of non-white people, non-christian people and homosexuals. What are liberals known for? Hating the haters, and maybe loving everybody else too much.
pillsome195 1 year ago
@pillsome195 It surprises me how inside in the box you are, but I know the way you can understand why people see the Democrats as the party of hate. It's very simple, just write 10 lines explaining what kind of man is President Bush (use as many adjectives as you can), then put President Obama instead. Read it aloud. Last think.
If you actually do it let me know.
Edwardbrooklyn 1 year ago
@Edwardbrooklyn What are you talking about? Ok: A conservative network is clearly being prejudiced. Yes, the liberal side of things isn't perfect either, but conservatives aren't fun loving. They do things out of cruelty and hatred. Leave presidents out of it. I'm talking about the two collectives of people. One is generally loving of others and one is hating of others. Can you honestly say "conservatives love all people?"
pillsome195 1 year ago
The ratings success can be easily explained. Stupid people watch news channels for information.
gossieuk 1 year ago 22
@gossieuk Yeah........THAT"S the explanation. You sound like a real genius, you magnificent bastard.
cano21 1 year ago
@cano21
Your kind words have given me a semi. Is that duelling banjos I hear?
gossieuk 1 year ago
@gossieuk that is so true!!
coollinemms 1 year ago
@gossieuk the news is a bunch of shit lol i agree
BardleyCfan 1 year ago
@gossieuk Yeah,ya dopey little cheese twit - and smart people readily resort to the Daily Star and the Sun for their info. That's why every Brit with an IQ greater than their hat size moved off that shithole island years ago. Carry on, son.
hansboofer 1 year ago
Bill O'Rielly... WE GON FIND YOU! and we gonna get you kicked off the air.
biggydx 1 year ago 4
BULL PUCKY!
RenlimArt 1 year ago