LOL Hitler was an idiot. He had no military expertise, yet believed he could run and direct the German military. Had it not been for his excellent general, Germany would have been crushed much earlier.
@texrocksify I actually do. You are talking about the same military tacticians who opened a second front with a gigantic country, underestimated it, miscalculated every obstacle they would face after opening the front, and eventually got so fucked that most of them suicided. About the ratio; Go look at Patton's own records. The resistance in France was almost non-existent compared to the Eastern front. Now shove your head up your ass and fuck off.
To all you Hitler lovers, you should know that his tactics were proofed fatal one year earlier under the battle of Moscow, where Germans lost big time, so this was nothing new to the Red Army Generals
Americans should read why Japan was neutral with the Soviets. In 1938-1939, Japan threw a few of their best divisions against the Soviets, but the Soviets beat up the Japanese both times. Had these battles been a stalemate, perhaps Japan would've invaded Siberia when the Germans invaded the Soviets. Because the Japanese signed a neutral act, the Soviets was free to send west 50 excellent crack divisions against the Germans in Dec. 1941
Why do I say this?! I was stationed in Wildflecken, Germany or the ONE-INCH LINE in the 60's. I had to study how the Soviets fought in case the Soviets invaded thru the Fulda Gap. We had to live as long as possible and hope for reinforcements from the west. I am forever grateful for the Soviet sacrifice
Without the sacrifice of the Soviets, the western allies could not invade France- yes, it appears impressive with all the ships and equipment on the English channel, but, it would've been more impressive if 100 German divisions were waiting for them.
The Americans would not sacrifice 5-10million soldiers with no guarantee of victory in a 'foreign' continent.
Good piece but incorrect in it's analysis is incorrect. Insignificant tinkering by Hitler is not the reason Plan Blue failed. When you base a plan on intelengence that says the enemy has run out of reserves when in fact they have a million men in ten feild armies and other formations your chance of sucess are very slim. Add this to another blunder that insured the northern flank of army group A would be harassed and you have the recipe for the disaster that was about to happen.
damn I hate this western documentaries. They are so full of biased, listen how they praise the Hitler, and how they bash Stalin as an "ruthless dictator"
@iainhead unless i'm off my rocker, the second battle of kharkov was after the Stalingrad debacle not before, and directly caused the bulge leading up to operation citadel.
@c9az And non stop bombing of German war industry from US and UK's air forces. I think the US air force did more damage than all of the armies combined in destroying the German war machine. The wehrmacht couldnt even show themselves during the day in France or Germany from 43-45 due to allied strafing and bombing mostly from the U.S.
@emmteez1 Well you are seriously mistaken. Even the inbred brits managed to fight Germany but only the Soviets were able to destroy the whole Wehrmacht. More than 75% of German war effort went to the eastern front. Your argument is invalid. And I laugh at your history knowledge. The allies landed on Western Europe in 1944 and the only resistance they faced were children from hitler youth.
@emmteez1 They faced 1st ss panzer division Liebstandarte , 2nd ss panzer division das reich , GrossDeutschland divsion along with many other elite divisions when allies invaded france
@TheBlindPowerslave 75% of the German war effort went to the eastern front? After the Allied landing in Normandy it was roughly 60 - 40 although from mid 1942 onwards at least 65% of the Luftwaffe was in the west and nearly 100% of the Kreigsmarine. Only children in western Europe? I presume that these kids were driving the tanks of the Panzer Divisions there. Strangely enough there were not many prisoners who were kids although no doubt you will have a daft explanation for that.
Difference between a Soviet and a Russian is that a Soviet is brutal, merciless with loyalty.A Russian is honest, hard working and more civilized but far from weak as well.
NKVD generals were training the Gestapo at one point in history and the NKVD would turn over German immigrants back to the Gestapo who were fleeing from Hitler's regime heading to Russia.The Nazis were shaking hands with the Soviets.There is actual video evidence of this.
The germans had the russians by the balls, if only hitler did not interfere it would have been a very different out come, it wasn't that the russians won the war, rather the germans lost it, they where totally out classed smarter better prepared if only hitler minded his own business.
+the kraut was way superior to the russian better trained in every thing+
They were losers. Good soldiers but losers.
I always like to hear loser's excuses, it's so funny.
"Hitler was fool, There were too cold, We were too hungry, Russians were too angry, Roads were too dirty...etc"
Looks like fairytales of young whimsical virgin girls. OK. I understand it's too hard to say "They were better us". But all "if", and all exuses just bullshit. The RESULT is main thing for soldier.
Hitler got a head of himself they thought that they could end the war before the onset of winter, even though his generals warned against this action, lest they where unprepared, hitler wouldn't even let them to breakout, he said it was there duty to die in battle even though they had no supplies, fucking goring said that he could supply them with the 6 tons of supplies need on a daily basis to survive, maybe 1/10 got through condoms etc..
+fucking goring said that he could supply them with the 6 tons of supplies need on a daily basis to survive, maybe 1/10 got through condoms etc+
Who care about Germans problems? Soviets had their own problems too. They were attacked surprizingly. But Russians never used such foolish excuses. If they hadn't enough guns, food, ammo they just was trying to find a way to get RESULT. Real Soldiers.
it was hitler who defeated germany. ofcourse he got germany many victories. well anyways evil will not and should not win. thus fate and fatal sense prevailed . fatal sense in the form of hitler's commanding the german army arrived and destroyed gemany.
@AmericanDream1900 Having the Italians as Allies might have cost Hitler the war. Barbarossa was delayed by 6 weeks due to the Balkans campaign. It also opened up Germany's southern flank to Allied air attacks and eventual invasion. The Germans wasted alot of air and ground resources defending N Africa and then Italy.
The officers killed in the purges probably wouldn't have done any better than the officers left alive facing the Germans. They were fighting by doctrines of WWI
@Attila709 How do you know the Soviet officer were? Most of the damage was done because Stalin refused to allow for strategic withdraws, like Hitler did later in the war.
And why did the Red Army need strategic withdrawls when they had millions of troops, thousands of planes, tanks and guns at the front line? The Soviet officers in June of 41 were not educated to deal with Blitzkrieg
@Attila709 That's because tens of thousands were slaughtered by Stalin in 1937 and most of their equipment was junk and their soldiers poorly trained due to lack of experienced officers.
Experienced at what? Just as in the west, they weren't trained to deal with Blitzkrieg. And the equipment would have been junk even if the purges didn't happen.
@Bellicose27 What does that have to do with Stalingrad? Besides, Mexico can't even control its cities now. If anything, the USA will break up into several different countries, none controlled by Mexico. Honestly, why would any US state want to be annexed by Mexico?
This is an interesting question that USA faces. The latino population overtaking the anglo majority. I noticed slowly the country is becoming bilingual with all the packaging. The US is sliding into a third world country. US states might not have any choice in the matter.Anyway interesting book by Buchanon "State of Emergency"
@Bellicose27 Someone posted that the US let in tons of the Mexicans, according to Pat Buchanan. Since I didn't read the book, I was hoping they'd tell us who's to blame.
The Germans inexplicably declared war on the United States on December 8th 1941. It is not at all certain that we would have declared war on Germany after Pearl Harbor. Our beef was with Japan. What makes this action even stranger is that it came only two days after the Soviet's massive counter offensive began. The last thing the Germans needed was to take on a second major demographic and industrial power. Fortunately for western civilization, Hitler was an idiot.
The reality is that Russia is too mighty, was then, and always will be perhaps the toughest nation to conquer or neutralize. They have been around for a 1,000 years, with one of the biggest and most powerful empires in history.
@Cthulu51 Inexplicably declared war? Germany was allied with Japan. That's what allies do....declare war on you allies' enemies. Just like WW1. Germany didn't start the war. Austria-Hungary did, but since Germany was allied with them, they did what all "good" allies do.
@MrBmill25 i guess you're talking about the ww1, and that war was engineeried by british not by austria-hungary, the guy who assasinated austrian emperor, was prior to the attack in London on numerous occasions, not to say on instructions. WW1 was orchestreted by the brits because they evergrowing fear of the german empire, WW2 was almost a direct logical answer to the impossible conditions imposed by the allies to germany. then you can say thatUK is directly responsible for the both wars.
@MrBmill25 They don't have to do it though. At the time, Germany was in a death struggle with the USSR and had the Brits pecking away at its backside. Why take on another giant? Hitler had already asked Japan to attack the USSR from the East, but they attacked the USA instead and caused even more problems for the Axis.
@happygolucky93 he bareley invaded the west. most of the 3rd reich was eastern europe. to get to russia he had to get to poland. and if he attacked poland france would have attacked germany. thats why hitler invaded france
the same with leningrad. vast stupities of stalin - and corruption among the city's ruling elite - combied with german atrocities to kill up 1m or more people or more. but the germans are the main ones at fault; it was their plan, after all, to kill all 2.5m residents thru starvation.
No, this procedure was carried in time of Khrushchev (after 20th Congress of CPSU) - end of 50-th - 60. And opinion of russian people was not asked anybody.
But people placed portraits of Stalin in own houses, cars, work-places etc.
This effect was manifested especially in 60-th and 80-th.
Khrushchev had lost people's support and lost his power.
"Ass with ears" - this people's opinion from that time.
because WW2 has everything what war is, politics, fighting, secretes, power, partership, and a lot of Big battles that you never see today. It has both (sea land air) fighting, most of the biggest battles ever fought were in WW2, there were battles almoast all around the world.
@lifes40123 WWI didn't have the great air battles, missiles, rockets, assault rifles, advanced tanks, aircraft carriers and other technological aspects of WWII.
Pummit94, neverthless Russians were able to anihilate German army regadless of purges. Speaking of Suomi, you were defending your homeland from Soviet regime, not from Russians. Russians (believe it was imperor Alexander II) gave Suomi sovereginity aka exit from Russian Empire without any revolt or bloodsheding. Do not put "soviet" and "russians" under the same cup.
@ivsny just a fucking coummonist, the finnish fail was becasue they was not ready for comabt but when the german come they was the powerfulest country in the world
Scary, think if Stalin had not held any purgese, would the world be verry different. For me as a finn i think it would caue mainly due to the purgess were we able to defend our homeland from the russians
Yes i do know that it was alexander the 2 who gave us our freedom for virtually nothing and no we would have fallen under the wehrmacht which is why we were forced to ally with the germans. This was done only to keep Finland indipendent. (Why do you call me stupid?)
This is in our future. Left wing terror.
trippletear 1 week ago
you have a bad perception of good and evil, man
TheMagigee 3 months ago
LOL Hitler was an idiot. He had no military expertise, yet believed he could run and direct the German military. Had it not been for his excellent general, Germany would have been crushed much earlier.
dunnowy123 3 months ago
Hitler was clearly the lesser of 2 evils.
rotagen5 4 months ago
@rotagen5
You have a bad perception of good and evil, man.
dunnowy123 3 months ago
@texrocksify /watch?v=aHeXm7t-aAY
enjoy your day redneck
TheBlindPowerslave 4 months ago
@texrocksify I actually do. You are talking about the same military tacticians who opened a second front with a gigantic country, underestimated it, miscalculated every obstacle they would face after opening the front, and eventually got so fucked that most of them suicided. About the ratio; Go look at Patton's own records. The resistance in France was almost non-existent compared to the Eastern front. Now shove your head up your ass and fuck off.
TheBlindPowerslave 4 months ago
where is part 1???????????
interekweb 4 months ago
To all you Hitler lovers, you should know that his tactics were proofed fatal one year earlier under the battle of Moscow, where Germans lost big time, so this was nothing new to the Red Army Generals
vikruss 4 months ago
Why Hitler invaded Russia, he could just trade with them. It's good for both!
NgJackal1990 4 months ago
@NgJackal1990
...
did he not just explain why in the doc? An invasion of the USSR was critical to Nazism.
dunnowy123 3 months ago
@TheHistory1995 I am worse than Trotzky
BruceBufferFTW 5 months ago
What a big mistake of Hitler to not listen to his generals and to not take Moscow first!
BattlefieldE3 6 months ago
where iss part 1?
followernumber1 6 months ago
A couple of heavyweight nutcases
Gravel4Prez 7 months ago
Stalin the Bully Kutta was a Great man and cruel to his enemy which was good.
SAMAND33 7 months ago
Americans should read why Japan was neutral with the Soviets. In 1938-1939, Japan threw a few of their best divisions against the Soviets, but the Soviets beat up the Japanese both times. Had these battles been a stalemate, perhaps Japan would've invaded Siberia when the Germans invaded the Soviets. Because the Japanese signed a neutral act, the Soviets was free to send west 50 excellent crack divisions against the Germans in Dec. 1941
tartan64tan 7 months ago
Why do I say this?! I was stationed in Wildflecken, Germany or the ONE-INCH LINE in the 60's. I had to study how the Soviets fought in case the Soviets invaded thru the Fulda Gap. We had to live as long as possible and hope for reinforcements from the west. I am forever grateful for the Soviet sacrifice
tartan64tan 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Without the sacrifice of the Soviets, the western allies could not invade France- yes, it appears impressive with all the ships and equipment on the English channel, but, it would've been more impressive if 100 German divisions were waiting for them.
The Americans would not sacrifice 5-10million soldiers with no guarantee of victory in a 'foreign' continent.
tartan64tan 7 months ago
Good piece but incorrect in it's analysis is incorrect. Insignificant tinkering by Hitler is not the reason Plan Blue failed. When you base a plan on intelengence that says the enemy has run out of reserves when in fact they have a million men in ten feild armies and other formations your chance of sucess are very slim. Add this to another blunder that insured the northern flank of army group A would be harassed and you have the recipe for the disaster that was about to happen.
bniziol 8 months ago
damn I hate this western documentaries. They are so full of biased, listen how they praise the Hitler, and how they bash Stalin as an "ruthless dictator"
UTubeisSHIT523441 8 months ago
@UTubeisSHIT523441 I did not hear any praise of Hitler. And Stalin was a ruthless dictator - how else would you describe him?
alanheath3 8 months ago
I love these documentaries. Thanks for uploading.
HenryvKeiper 8 months ago
Wheres episode 1? Looks like the start was the second battle of Kharkov, mi favorita
iainhead 9 months ago
@iainhead That is an unusual choice for a favourite - and therefore refreshing to hear.
alanheath3 8 months ago
@iainhead unless i'm off my rocker, the second battle of kharkov was after the Stalingrad debacle not before, and directly caused the bulge leading up to operation citadel.
stuka80 7 months ago
@stuka80 You are indeed off your rocker, you are describing the 3rd battle of Kharkov
iainhead 7 months ago
@c9az And non stop bombing of German war industry from US and UK's air forces. I think the US air force did more damage than all of the armies combined in destroying the German war machine. The wehrmacht couldnt even show themselves during the day in France or Germany from 43-45 due to allied strafing and bombing mostly from the U.S.
emmteez1 10 months ago
@emmteez1 Well you are seriously mistaken. Even the inbred brits managed to fight Germany but only the Soviets were able to destroy the whole Wehrmacht. More than 75% of German war effort went to the eastern front. Your argument is invalid. And I laugh at your history knowledge. The allies landed on Western Europe in 1944 and the only resistance they faced were children from hitler youth.
TheBlindPowerslave 10 months ago
@TheBlindPowerslave If you think the only opposition the allies faced in 44-45 was hitler youth than your not even worth arguing with.
emmteez1 10 months ago 18
Comment removed
JagerpanzerIV 5 months ago
@emmteez1 They faced 1st ss panzer division Liebstandarte , 2nd ss panzer division das reich , GrossDeutschland divsion along with many other elite divisions when allies invaded france
popper504 2 months ago
@TheBlindPowerslave 75% of the German war effort went to the eastern front? After the Allied landing in Normandy it was roughly 60 - 40 although from mid 1942 onwards at least 65% of the Luftwaffe was in the west and nearly 100% of the Kreigsmarine. Only children in western Europe? I presume that these kids were driving the tanks of the Panzer Divisions there. Strangely enough there were not many prisoners who were kids although no doubt you will have a daft explanation for that.
alanheath3 8 months ago
@emmteez1 I doubt the USAF did more damage. If you added the RAF to then maybe you have a point.
alanheath3 8 months ago
so annoying how the first video was removed
Requiredghr18 1 year ago
5:06 Amazing how the planes are doing that. It's hard enough to draw a star. lol
TheCinemaization 1 year ago
Pro tip for starting a world war: Never ally with Japan.
TheIphone4thewin 1 year ago
@TheIphone4thewin Or never fight a land war in Asia.
JohnnyC133 11 months ago
Difference between a Soviet and a Russian is that a Soviet is brutal, merciless with loyalty.A Russian is honest, hard working and more civilized but far from weak as well.
60microphonemajesty 1 year ago
@60microphonemajesty It's nice to hear what a Russian is from an American. But please do not ask what Russians think of Americans...
TheBlindPowerslave 10 months ago
@TheBlindPowerslave Having spent a lot of time in Russia, I know.
alanheath3 8 months ago
@alanheath3 Good for you.
TheBlindPowerslave 8 months ago
NKVD generals were training the Gestapo at one point in history and the NKVD would turn over German immigrants back to the Gestapo who were fleeing from Hitler's regime heading to Russia.The Nazis were shaking hands with the Soviets.There is actual video evidence of this.
60microphonemajesty 1 year ago
The weakness of Hitler and nazis is understimate their enemyes.
jeanbh2009 1 year ago
The germans had the russians by the balls, if only hitler did not interfere it would have been a very different out come, it wasn't that the russians won the war, rather the germans lost it, they where totally out classed smarter better prepared if only hitler minded his own business.
readynow12345 1 year ago
@readynow12345
+++if only hitler did not interfere+++
IF.
IF grandmother would has a dick - She would be a GRANDFATHER.(c)
Germans were very good soldiers. But Russian was the best.
Riltex 1 year ago
Sorry mate but your wrong, the kraut was way superior to the russian better trained in every thing..
And yes if hitler did not interfer germany would have won, you DUMB WAD..
readynow12345 1 year ago
@readynow12345
+the kraut was way superior to the russian better trained in every thing+
They were losers. Good soldiers but losers.
I always like to hear loser's excuses, it's so funny.
"Hitler was fool, There were too cold, We were too hungry, Russians were too angry, Roads were too dirty...etc"
Looks like fairytales of young whimsical virgin girls. OK. I understand it's too hard to say "They were better us". But all "if", and all exuses just bullshit. The RESULT is main thing for soldier.
Riltex 1 year ago
Hitler got a head of himself they thought that they could end the war before the onset of winter, even though his generals warned against this action, lest they where unprepared, hitler wouldn't even let them to breakout, he said it was there duty to die in battle even though they had no supplies, fucking goring said that he could supply them with the 6 tons of supplies need on a daily basis to survive, maybe 1/10 got through condoms etc..
readynow12345 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@readynow12345
+fucking goring said that he could supply them with the 6 tons of supplies need on a daily basis to survive, maybe 1/10 got through condoms etc+
Who care about Germans problems? Soviets had their own problems too. They were attacked surprizingly. But Russians never used such foolish excuses. If they hadn't enough guns, food, ammo they just was trying to find a way to get RESULT. Real Soldiers.
Riltex 1 year ago
@Riltex German soldiers were vastly better than any of the others but lacked the numbers and supplies at critical times.
blackmourning11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blackmourning11
+German soldiers were vastly better than any of the others+
German soldiers were good fighters. But they were not better than Russians.
+but lacked the numbers and supplies at critical times.+
Who care about Germans problems?
Soviets had their own problems too.
If they hadn't enough people, guns, food, ammo they just was trying to find a way to get RESULT.
Real Soldiers.
Riltex 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blackmourning11
+German soldiers were vastly better than any of the others+
German soldiers were good fighters. But they were not better than Russians.
+but lacked the numbers and supplies at critical times.+
Who care about Germans problems?
Soviets had their own problems too.
If they hadn't enough people, guns, food, ammo they just was trying to find a way to get RESULT.
Real Soldiers.
Riltex 1 year ago
does anyone know where i can watch this in full?
followernumber1 1 year ago
@followernumber1 Just go to playlist
2bn442RCT 1 year ago
its stupid that part one was removed! this show is all but dead whats the point of copyrighting it?
followernumber1 1 year ago
@followernumber1 Try 2bn442rct my other site
2bn442RCT 1 year ago
@followernumber1 aprt 1 is pretty much a quick lecture on basics anyway
2bn442RCT 1 year ago
IF, IF, IF...if my grandfather had not died he would be still alive !.
Germany, Italy, Japan...the great Axis...was DEFEATED !
The "inferior" non-aryans kicked their asses so badly....
Not bad at all for inferior races.....
The great leaders...Mussolini was hung, the "brave" Fuhrer commited suicide while sending young kids to face the Soviet onslaught on Berlin
In what concerna Japan...why shed a tear for the Niponic bastards ?
They fully got what they so richly deserved.
VIRIATO1942 1 year ago
now, if the Russians joined the Germans,Spanish,Japs,and Italiens during WW2, then the Axis might would have one more chance of concering Europa
novakknoxville24 1 year ago
technically, Trotsky was Lenin's rightful heir, infact, Lenin said "whatever you do, Stalin must not be dictator."
spinynorman230 1 year ago 16
However the French surrendered and didn't even fight in this battle
gopconservative78 1 year ago
5:07 Star!
MultiMarcus99 1 year ago
it was hitler who defeated germany. ofcourse he got germany many victories. well anyways evil will not and should not win. thus fate and fatal sense prevailed . fatal sense in the form of hitler's commanding the german army arrived and destroyed gemany.
sonny19xx 1 year ago
GOD BLE HIM
MrFjandinn 1 year ago
stalin was the new tsar.
Rico8458 1 year ago
Do not wage a war on Russia.
If you want to lose a war, take Italians as allies.
Bismark.
Hitler did just the opposite - waged a war on Russia and took Italians as allies.
AmericanDream1900 2 years ago
@AmericanDream1900 Having the Italians as Allies might have cost Hitler the war. Barbarossa was delayed by 6 weeks due to the Balkans campaign. It also opened up Germany's southern flank to Allied air attacks and eventual invasion. The Germans wasted alot of air and ground resources defending N Africa and then Italy.
jackzero99 2 years ago
The officers killed in the purges probably wouldn't have done any better than the officers left alive facing the Germans. They were fighting by doctrines of WWI
Attila709 2 years ago
@Attila709 That's like claiming the German officers were fighting by the doctrines of WWI.
jackzero99 2 years ago
But they clearly weren't
Attila709 2 years ago
@Attila709 How do you know the Soviet officer were? Most of the damage was done because Stalin refused to allow for strategic withdraws, like Hitler did later in the war.
jackzero99 2 years ago
And why did the Red Army need strategic withdrawls when they had millions of troops, thousands of planes, tanks and guns at the front line? The Soviet officers in June of 41 were not educated to deal with Blitzkrieg
Attila709 2 years ago
@Attila709 That's because tens of thousands were slaughtered by Stalin in 1937 and most of their equipment was junk and their soldiers poorly trained due to lack of experienced officers.
jackzero99 2 years ago
Experienced at what? Just as in the west, they weren't trained to deal with Blitzkrieg. And the equipment would have been junk even if the purges didn't happen.
Attila709 2 years ago
@Attila709 It doesn't mean they couldn't have performed better, had fewer casualties, and inflicted more casualties on the Germans to slow them down.
jackzero99 2 years ago
jackzero99, USA will be non-white by 2056 according to US census. Will the Mexicans reclaim Texas, California Arizona and Nevada?
Bellicose27 1 year ago
@Bellicose27 What does that have to do with Stalingrad? Besides, Mexico can't even control its cities now. If anything, the USA will break up into several different countries, none controlled by Mexico. Honestly, why would any US state want to be annexed by Mexico?
jackzero99 1 year ago
jackzero99, Nothing.
This is an interesting question that USA faces. The latino population overtaking the anglo majority. I noticed slowly the country is becoming bilingual with all the packaging. The US is sliding into a third world country. US states might not have any choice in the matter.Anyway interesting book by Buchanon "State of Emergency"
Bellicose27 1 year ago
@Bellicose27 The tiny white minority rules Mexico.
jackzero99 1 year ago
@Bellicose27
the USA anyways is under Jewish rule, so it does not matter which skin color the population has.
TheSunmanho 1 year ago
@Bellicose27 Why did this happen, tell us please.
paolosilv 1 year ago
@paolosilv What happened?
Bellicose27 1 year ago
@Bellicose27 Someone posted that the US let in tons of the Mexicans, according to Pat Buchanan. Since I didn't read the book, I was hoping they'd tell us who's to blame.
paolosilv 1 year ago
@paolosilv Who do you think is to blame?
Bellicose27 1 year ago
@Bellicose27 Democrats, 1965 changed the Civil Rights laws, but that's all I know about it. 1987, Reagan amnesty .
paolosilv 1 year ago
@paolosilv Yes, and corporations wanting cheap labour. Americans need a maid that is cheap and someone to do landscaping etc.....
Bellicose27 1 year ago
@paolosilv Not really civil rights with Mexicans. They changed the immigration law 1967.
Bellicose27 1 year ago
The Germans inexplicably declared war on the United States on December 8th 1941. It is not at all certain that we would have declared war on Germany after Pearl Harbor. Our beef was with Japan. What makes this action even stranger is that it came only two days after the Soviet's massive counter offensive began. The last thing the Germans needed was to take on a second major demographic and industrial power. Fortunately for western civilization, Hitler was an idiot.
Cthulu51 2 years ago
The reality is that Russia is too mighty, was then, and always will be perhaps the toughest nation to conquer or neutralize. They have been around for a 1,000 years, with one of the biggest and most powerful empires in history.
tropickman 2 years ago
@Cthulu51 Inexplicably declared war? Germany was allied with Japan. That's what allies do....declare war on you allies' enemies. Just like WW1. Germany didn't start the war. Austria-Hungary did, but since Germany was allied with them, they did what all "good" allies do.
MrBmill25 2 years ago
@MrBmill25 i guess you're talking about the ww1, and that war was engineeried by british not by austria-hungary, the guy who assasinated austrian emperor, was prior to the attack in London on numerous occasions, not to say on instructions. WW1 was orchestreted by the brits because they evergrowing fear of the german empire, WW2 was almost a direct logical answer to the impossible conditions imposed by the allies to germany. then you can say thatUK is directly responsible for the both wars.
KNEZTRPIMIR 2 years ago
@MrBmill25 They don't have to do it though. At the time, Germany was in a death struggle with the USSR and had the Brits pecking away at its backside. Why take on another giant? Hitler had already asked Japan to attack the USSR from the East, but they attacked the USA instead and caused even more problems for the Axis.
jackzero99 2 years ago
@Cthulu51 I could never figure out why Hitler did that. One thing for sure is that Hitler was very loyal to his allies, except for Stalin.
jackzero99 2 years ago
hit should invade russia before invading the west.
happygolucky93 2 years ago
@happygolucky93 he bareley invaded the west. most of the 3rd reich was eastern europe. to get to russia he had to get to poland. and if he attacked poland france would have attacked germany. thats why hitler invaded france
lifes40123 2 years ago
Stalin was never as charismatic as Hitler.
GRINDZ440 2 years ago
A nice piece of work to immortalize the deaths and suffering of all the people involved in this human tragedy.This was a terrible event of history.
ankitraptor 2 years ago 8
Makes you sick that all those innocents on whatever side where killed.
2bn442RCT 2 years ago
Indeed. There is nothing noble or glorious about the war on the eastern front
higfny 2 years ago
Stalingrad was a hell for all those who fought there. People suffered because of follies of Stalin and Hitler.What a terrible waste of human life.
ankitraptor 2 years ago 3
the same with leningrad. vast stupities of stalin - and corruption among the city's ruling elite - combied with german atrocities to kill up 1m or more people or more. but the germans are the main ones at fault; it was their plan, after all, to kill all 2.5m residents thru starvation.
routeoz 2 years ago
Stalin was an asshole... but so was hitler
massefeect18 2 years ago
Really?
You should tell to Russians about Stalin 8))
They are living, and not knowing it.
Learn REAL history, and not only in Interpretation of USA/UK's historians.
archanticipator 2 years ago
Im not stalin was one of the worst dictators in the world killed so many people...
massefeect18 2 years ago
@archanticipator Didn't the Russians tear down Stalin's statues in many cities?
jackzero99 2 years ago
@jackzero99
No, this procedure was carried in time of Khrushchev (after 20th Congress of CPSU) - end of 50-th - 60. And opinion of russian people was not asked anybody.
But people placed portraits of Stalin in own houses, cars, work-places etc.
This effect was manifested especially in 60-th and 80-th.
Khrushchev had lost people's support and lost his power.
"Ass with ears" - this people's opinion from that time.
Sorry for my Eng.
archanticipator 1 year ago
Today, after 25 years of company of Defamation (25 years!) Stalin's support - 60-78% russians (different estimations).
archanticipator 1 year ago
Yes, but could they fuck????
tumsabai1 2 years ago
My grandfather barely made it back from the hell of Stalingrad , cursed be stalin .
davazno1 2 years ago 7
PBS put these excellent WW 2 series together.Excellent content,facts and explains it all.Simple and basic.I still love watching these over again.
greene1100 2 years ago
im addicted to ww2 history.i find all wars fascinating,but none like WW2.
noblepuker 2 years ago 3
damn yeah me too. its a fucking piece of history none should miss
capacopkilla123 2 years ago
because WW2 has everything what war is, politics, fighting, secretes, power, partership, and a lot of Big battles that you never see today. It has both (sea land air) fighting, most of the biggest battles ever fought were in WW2, there were battles almoast all around the world.
No other war comes even close
DarkHour404 2 years ago
@DarkHour404 lol world war 1?
lifes40123 2 years ago
@lifes40123 WWI didn't have the great air battles, missiles, rockets, assault rifles, advanced tanks, aircraft carriers and other technological aspects of WWII.
jackzero99 2 years ago
Why isn't this series on DVD?!?!?! >:(
June28July 2 years ago
But he did turn it into world super power, with blood shed tho
RA30511 3 years ago
Pummit94, neverthless Russians were able to anihilate German army regadless of purges. Speaking of Suomi, you were defending your homeland from Soviet regime, not from Russians. Russians (believe it was imperor Alexander II) gave Suomi sovereginity aka exit from Russian Empire without any revolt or bloodsheding. Do not put "soviet" and "russians" under the same cup.
ivsny 3 years ago 15
Sorry no comment.
HistCoN 2 years ago
@ivsny just a fucking coummonist, the finnish fail was becasue they was not ready for comabt but when the german come they was the powerfulest country in the world
MultiMarcus99 1 year ago
@MultiMarcus99
Please speak English and not retard please.
JerryConlon 1 year ago
@JerryConlon Why dont you try speaking German . Ignorant scum.
mrmagicroundcircle 1 year ago
@MultiMarcus99 stop smoking crap and pull your head out of your ass...
ivsny 1 year ago
@ivsny Why not Hitler and the Germans called it Russia when it was the Soviet Union...? hehe
emmteez1 10 months ago
Scary, think if Stalin had not held any purgese, would the world be verry different. For me as a finn i think it would caue mainly due to the purgess were we able to defend our homeland from the russians
Pummi94 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Woud you've been able do defend yourself from Nazis, stupid Finn
purplehazygurl 3 years ago
Yes i do know that it was alexander the 2 who gave us our freedom for virtually nothing and no we would have fallen under the wehrmacht which is why we were forced to ally with the germans. This was done only to keep Finland indipendent. (Why do you call me stupid?)
Pummi94 3 years ago 3
Stalin is guilty of neglecting his army
RA30511 3 years ago 2