F1 is more danger i mean the have no with stettige of low km ! Only u in foot hit so small pull on the motor of the F1 You are IN driver over 100 km to can up 500 km ! is very speed but We can not driver the Car F1 for at we need first have because like have many year driver with Nacsar or Rally Car or some like almost samt tings cars then can you driver final Car sport F1=) Is crazy right?
@l0l0yd no even better my friend a a big bike with a turbo charger a standard sukuki hayabusa with a turbo producing around 400bhp in a striaght line with that f1 car. it's power to weight ratio that wins. i know what would win how about you?
@wajaeboseben The S1000RR isnt a MotoGP bike. BMW doesn't even participate in MotoGP -_-.
Highest recorded speed in a MotoGP race is 217 MPH, not far from 220 MPH by F1(again this is in a race, not a straight line that is made to prove real top speed.) Next year MotoGP is going to 1000cc engines.
Again even with improvements on a MotoGP bike, an F1 car would probably beat it in a race anyway. It's the pinnacle of race car driving and there's no denying that.
@m1n7y he is. have in mind that thats a road legal bike against a prototype race car, no chance the bike will keep up, now .....a moto gp bike, thats another story
There is nothing that can match a Formula 1 car on a track like that. Considering they can reach up to 6 g's in corners and have ungodly acceleration and stopping power, it was kind of a given that a bike wouldn't keep up. Now, if there was any way to develop a system that could give some serious downforce on the bike while cornering, that might change things.
For this reason cars are faster and more Agile!!! And this test was made against a 2009 BMW Sauber car,that is not that Fast, But put it against a 2004 Williams FW26!! The bike would be crushed.
I don't think your people realize just how capable a F1 car really is.....Go watch them in person before you make claims about what they can and can not do......A moto gp bike doesn't have a chance in hell of keeping up with a F1 car on the track. I've seen both many times over....it's not even remotely close. I'm not biased against either one, just stating the facts here....
@Sameer2762 i think that has more to do with the cars off the line acceleration lol considering you would be insane to take of full throttle on a bike....especially that one
try to see the video again and again.... :P you will get the idea what am saying, cars can never take out so much acceleration of the line the bike's can, one of my single cylinder 150cc bike *ucked my 1100cc 4 cylinder car off the line, and it was a drag and untill the bike touched a bloody 138 :D, which happened to be the near tope speed number it was succesful in keepin the car behind :) cars are just so useless though :P
lol the f1 sounds like obnoxious little kid tearing shit up, while the mellow bike is like a dad chasing lethargically and reluctantly after his child
F1 car destroy anything round a track but motoGP bike is faster up a straight. fact. check top speeds on larger tracks... the GP bikes come out of the corners slower and have to brake well earlier but GP bikes still manage to record a higher speed up the long straights. Bullshitters keep the fanmail and go google lap times and speeds
@nutsack1888 thats because formula 1 cars have huge ammounts of downforce which creates drag, where as bikes have very little downforce and aerodynamical grip, bikes are all about mechanical grip. If you take the wing off a formula one car, it can go over 400kph easily
@nutsack1888 The Zonda R isn't that fast... Depending on the track, for example, MONZA GP, I am pretty sure a moto gp bike would take that based on accelleration alone. Ive never seen real specs on a moto gp bikes acceleration, but if it can do 124mph in 3.8secs then mayybe it could beat an F1 car. But then its lead would disappear the moment they had to brake.. Hahaha.
one of the biggest stereotypes is that cars will always beat bikes around a track.
Yet there are plenty of videos of professionals racing ducatis against ferraris, lambos and other various sports cars and they win, some by over 4-10secs.
Why?, because assuming that the car will win just because it has 4 wheels is a generalisation, bikes have beaten cars and vice versa, it depends on the track.
As for F1 beating a bike, no surprise, F1 has a bigger power to weight ratio and downforce.
Simple fact is, cars have 2 more wheels than bikes, meaning that cars can transport twice as much energy to the ground than a motorcycle.
So take a bike and a car with exactly the same power/weight ratio and put 2 professional race drivers/riders in/on them, who race them at exactly 100% (which will not be possible) and youll see, that a car will always be faster.
Racing suspension and tyres shouldnt need further mention.
You didnt read my last sentence did you? Making a car have an equal power to weight of a bike effectively turns it into a race car. = Formula 1
Again, its a generalization to assume that a car will win just because it has 4 wheels. and for a conventional supercar to have an equal power to weight ratio with a bike, its power would have to be over 1500bhp, far too high for the road even for a supercar.
@KingSams0n Not to mention, even if you give a ferrari an equal power to weight ratio, your assuming just because it has so, it will win.
Again, that is a generalization, why?, because the car wasn't designed for it. Look at the Atom V8 500BHP vs S1000RR, both had the same power to weight but the car didn't "slaughter the bike", it won by barely a second. why? because its power was simply too great for the car, it wasn't designed for it.
I never said a car would slaughter the bike, it just would be faster.
By how far it'd be faster I cant say.
To me it's just a matter of fact, put to racers on both vehicles going to their absolute limit and assume, you could totally eliminate the possibilty of human errors, in my opinion the car'd be faster.
It's just like that a bike has to brake twice as early as a car.
I mean, just compare braking points of F1 and MotoGP on the same track, you'd be astonished.
@KingSams0n There is no denying an F1 car could slaughter even a motogp bike. They were built to have a greater power to weight ratio and have the aerodynamics and setup for it to make the most of this absurd amount of power, including huge wheels.
My point is, an average sports car, this includes supercars have mainly between 400-600bhp. They are set up optimally for that kind of power. If you turbo them to a 1:1 ratio like a bike, it doesn't mean the car will win.
A good example is a super saloon like the BMW M5 or Audi RS6, despite having great brakes, suspension and in many cases MORE power than most supercars, they still lose to them around a track.
@KingSams0n ok based on your theory please explain how the bikes can trash anything at isle of man???? even norma BMW racers get left for dust. Over a large distance of very slow and very fast bends the bike works best. Round a small track a single seat race car has advantage. Also it costs hundreds of thousands for a car that matches bikes pow/weight ratio. Your argument is flawed but i will agree this bike have no chance against F1 car.. this vids silly
@KingSams0n no car can touch a bike over the full man course. i know coz i live here and its fact.. its been tried and tried again and the only thing close is a single seater Norma powered by bmw. I stated it as fact coz it is a FACT.. no arguments please kingsamson. Ive devoted 10years of my life to this shithole so I know exactly whats the fastest thing round it.
People, understand that your road bike is not a race bike. The front suspension from an Aprilia RSV4 Moto GP bike costs more than the Aprilia RSV4 factory roadbike itself.
@pacrat90 Except Aprilia does not compete in the MotoGP category *_* .I'm going to assume you mean WSBK(world super bike) However I would like to see how a real MotoGP bike would fair against an F1 Car. I'm sure F1 would win but would be fun to see nonetheless.
F1 stock or not will win any bike with any rider on it.... atleast in a normal race racing in a racetrack because F1 has the physics on its side.. it can take enormous Gs on the turns and brake instandly... if you try to brake instandly a bike you will catapulting yourself a few meters infront of it.. also if you try to turn a bike with many Kms on it (G presure) you probably will eat the dust...
Thats why F1 easily will win any bike.. even if the F1 has lower Top speed than the bike
you know whats funny, this is even a BMW S which is consider like 2 class open wheel car,is wrong what people say, THIS IS NOT A F1 car,its a open wheel car for the class of BMW, open wheel sport have many leguage ,Karting, Formula 3,Formula Ford, Formula 300, ect, and Formula 1 that is suppose to represent the best in racing sport
@mrdarkknight of course but a least fair battle. On a track with helicopter? helicopter wins of course cuz it doesnt need to take corners, it can just fly straight to the finish from the start.
@sarlaz123 the bike rider isn't shit, it's just physics. the guy on the bike is battling against limited traction and centrifugal force. f1 doesn't have this problem, there is no way a sport bike can be a match.
@graknor never said he was shit, im defending him against ppl thinking this is an actual race, if it was, Troy corser still could not win sadly, F1 is too fast. I'm glad you see it my way
look at the end bit were the bike starts off hes keeping up with the f1 car probs in a drag race the bike might just have a little chance hehehehehehe
@Robbyb321 yes i spotted that too, the car was dropping clutch while troy was still lifting a foot to put it in 1st gear didnt even have throttle open when car was taking off and he still made the car look ''not so fast as they say''
@Angelus12308 good point you are right the difference between an stock bike and a race bike is basicly the same now the difference between an street car and a race car is aloooot
Production car(any Corvette, Ferrari, Lambo) vs. production bike(s1000rr, cbr 1000, gsxr1000, zx 10, 1198, r1) and the bike will win. Race bike(moto gp) vs. Race car (f1)and the car will win.
@ridemfast55 your wrong will win in your head,you know why?cuz the fisical effort is more in a bike to push it to the limit than in a car,is been proven that after laps any regular bike driver cant push the same,which is not the care for a car, that the only limitation is the overheating of the tires.
@mark675 why you have to insult people for your lack of knowledge,why cant you bring points that have sense,if your going to reply this type of coment just to say something, limit yourself to listen what people have to say,so you can talk with facts.
@Ryosuke324 ive got more knowledge than youll ever have and if you call that insulting ur a very sensitive person i didnt even say nothing to insult you! haha
if your gonna answer people make sure u know what your talking about
@mark675 do you even know what DUMB ASS is?,do you even know me to call me a DUMB ASS?,and if you have any knowledge in anything, show it not in a DUMB ASS nonsense meaning reply, lets talk about motorsport,lets see who have read and watch more!
Yes, and that's because the moto gp bikes isn't THAT far ahead the street bikes, performance and weight wise. The street bikes are almost as tuned-up as they can be, and still reliable.
If you on the otherside, compare an F1 to a Lambo, then the F1 are miles apart from the Lambo. Just loook at it! The F1 has soo much traction, and a bike will never match that. The bikes biggest advantage has always been the power/weight ratio, but a F1, has almost the same...
@Rainb0wSeven You need to look up the definition of production then, because the Bugatti Veyron is well known to be the most expensive and fastest production car ever. If a car is being produced and sold, it's a production car. It's really not that hard a concept to grasp.
@Rainb0wSeven Formula 1 cars aren't produced for the commercial market. Anyone with enough money can go to a shop and buy a Bugatti or an Ariel Atom. They are produced for the commercial market, and so are called a production car.
Are you a Christian or Muslim by any chance? You certainly come across as having the kind of "waa waa I'm not listening" attitude that is common amongst the faithful.
Hahaha! - "Anyone with enough money" can buy a Formula 1 car. And are you really trying to compare a $1.5 million car with a Ford Focus? You are a fuckwit.
@Rainb0wSeven No. I'm owning you, but you seem oblivious to that. I didn't say that anybody with enough money can't buy a Formula 1 car, partly because it would be untrue. You just seem to really be struggling to comprehend that both a Ford Focus and a Bugatti Veyron could both be made for the same purpose: to be sold on the commercial market. That doesn't mean they have to be the same colour, the same price, or have the same performance figures, as you think they do.
No. A car that is made for multimillionaires cannot be considered a "production" car, nor is it made for the "commercial market". If Bugatti was making thousands of Veyrons each year, you could legitimately call it a production car. They aren't, though, so it isn't.
By your definition of "production", NASA's Space Shuttle is a production vehicle.
@Rainb0wSeven Yeah, obviously. A car that's made for millionaires couldn't possibly be road legal, be available on the open market, and be produced and sold by commercial outlets. English obviously isn't your first language, as your definition of "production" is way off the mark, and you've failed to read my comments properly. I suggest you go and study the language more. Then you won't make such silly mistakes, and won't appeal foolish when you lose your temper after being shown your mistakes.
I've read your comments and understood them perfectly well. It's just that you are an idiot whose definition of "production car" is all-inclusive, which is ridiculous.
BTW, my English comprehension is far better than yours, as evidenced by you writing, "and won't APPEAL foolish".
I reiterate: you are a fuckwit. No-one with any modicum of intelligence would agree with you that a $1.5 million, hand built supercar is a "production car".
@Rainb0wSeven When you start picking out basic typos to try and score points, you've just admitted defeat. If I were that petty I would point out the incorrect usage of the comma and lack of appropriate hyphen in that last comment, but there's no need to. According to you, it would be the English language that is wrong, and not you. By the way, I'm not even using my definition of a production car. I'm using the automotive industry's definition. Argue with them if you disagree.
@Rainb0wSeven And you're an inarticulate troll that can't differentiate between mass production and production. Got anything else to say, apart from banal insults? Thought not.
@kafor1999 Are u serious? about 50 race wins in World Superbike, about 14 track lap records 12th in championship of 2010 World Superbikes, winning World Superbike Championship in 1996 and 2005!
WTF? Troy Corsar is a bad ass muther fucker on a shit bike!
Idiots. Like comparing the best PC/MAC/Linux home PC to the worlds fastest super computers. Pointless. Even comparing a super-Vyron/super-SSC etc to a £12k motobike is dumb.
If you want a car that isn't road legal, can't deal with a speed bumps, can't take your take your missus and requires a support team plus and engine rebuild/change every 300 miles then yeah, an F1 car is great. Oh, and it depreciates massively after a few races.
This was BMW motorsports publicity event. Rider and Driver were both professional. The laws of physics prevents any race motorcycle from beating a F1 car on the track. F1 vehicles have about the same or better power to weight ratio of a motorcycle + 4 giant gummy tires + brakes that will give you 4-6 neg G's and Aerodynamics to push you down for faster corner. A track record like Laguna Seca is ~1:07 for F1 and 1:24 for race bike. Do the math. F1 lap bike every 4 laps.
@funkiershit I did...twas terrable
TheAirsoftmadman 2 months ago
i got a Lexus advertisement in a BMW video, what the hell ?
william69952 2 months ago
kubica!
SuperLukarius 2 months ago
Motorbikes=stupid boring F1=FAST THRILL
TheAirsoftmadman 2 months ago
@TheAirsoftmadman Boring? Clearly you have never rode a bike
MrMalyx 2 months ago 5
@TheAirsoftmadman lol! its about time you tried riding a bike then!
funkiershit 2 months ago
Motersport
TheAirsoftmadman 2 months ago
F1 is more danger i mean the have no with stettige of low km ! Only u in foot hit so small pull on the motor of the F1 You are IN driver over 100 km to can up 500 km ! is very speed but We can not driver the Car F1 for at we need first have because like have many year driver with Nacsar or Rally Car or some like almost samt tings cars then can you driver final Car sport F1=) Is crazy right?
Ammd1986 3 months ago
Now, let's see a road legal sport-tuned bike pitted against a road legal sport-tuned car on a racetrack. Wouldn't that be nice?
l0l0yd 3 months ago 4
@l0l0yd no. cars are for suckers. I've never owned one & don't like driving them. :p
ninjabob52 3 months ago
@l0l0yd no even better my friend a a big bike with a turbo charger a standard sukuki hayabusa with a turbo producing around 400bhp in a striaght line with that f1 car. it's power to weight ratio that wins. i know what would win how about you?
wayne1riley 1 month ago
Oh and this video looked more of a showing of BMW's F1 car and the S1000RR instead of a race. It's pretty obvious
Linkgt 4 months ago
a motorbike that is..
j4m35ac 4 months ago
nothing can beat a f1 car on track. id still prefer to ride though
j4m35ac 4 months ago 4
F1 CAR make MOTO GP look SLOW....haahahah
wajaeboseben 4 months ago
@wajaeboseben The S1000RR isnt a MotoGP bike. BMW doesn't even participate in MotoGP -_-.
Highest recorded speed in a MotoGP race is 217 MPH, not far from 220 MPH by F1(again this is in a race, not a straight line that is made to prove real top speed.) Next year MotoGP is going to 1000cc engines.
Again even with improvements on a MotoGP bike, an F1 car would probably beat it in a race anyway. It's the pinnacle of race car driving and there's no denying that.
Linkgt 4 months ago
Non c'è storia :-)
Inageko 4 months ago
that car sounds like a million screeming monkeys!!
cornrows1978 5 months ago
0:57 woooooooooooooow!!!
TicoJazzBass 5 months ago 2
i know a f1 car can corner faster than the bike but the guy on the bike doesn't even look as if he is trying
m1n7y 5 months ago
@m1n7y he is. have in mind that thats a road legal bike against a prototype race car, no chance the bike will keep up, now .....a moto gp bike, thats another story
jasonsand 5 months ago 2
Besides a Formula 1 car, the bike is just a toy.
UrsusVonForsteck78 6 months ago
Bikes can only do 3 laps to a formula 1 cars 4. If you dont believe me look up track times!
pyk420biatch 6 months ago
There is nothing that can match a Formula 1 car on a track like that. Considering they can reach up to 6 g's in corners and have ungodly acceleration and stopping power, it was kind of a given that a bike wouldn't keep up. Now, if there was any way to develop a system that could give some serious downforce on the bike while cornering, that might change things.
screamosux 6 months ago 4
awezome
convertorX87 10 months ago
Robert Get well soon!
FISHURMOMBALL 10 months ago
The Formula 1 car has the Physics advantage of 4 wheels and huge ammounts of downforce
dynamicz108 10 months ago 5
@dynamicz108
For this reason cars are faster and more Agile!!! And this test was made against a 2009 BMW Sauber car,that is not that Fast, But put it against a 2004 Williams FW26!! The bike would be crushed.
eduds6 5 months ago
The bike had no chance
chickencoop297 10 months ago
I don't think your people realize just how capable a F1 car really is.....Go watch them in person before you make claims about what they can and can not do......A moto gp bike doesn't have a chance in hell of keeping up with a F1 car on the track. I've seen both many times over....it's not even remotely close. I'm not biased against either one, just stating the facts here....
Oso1G 10 months ago
Comment removed
nutsack1888 10 months ago
@nutsack1888 what? i don't have any uploads...
animeonperseest 10 months ago
@ All, the car started gr8 coz it was using the pit lane button engaged..... and the bike started off later coz it was like normal bikes.... :)
Sameer2762 10 months ago
Is that the Nürburgring?
PiePlusPi 11 months ago
hasn't any1 noticed the car starting earlier than the bike?
Sameer2762 11 months ago 2
@Sameer2762 i think that has more to do with the cars off the line acceleration lol considering you would be insane to take of full throttle on a bike....especially that one
hutton4059 10 months ago
@hutton4059
try to see the video again and again.... :P you will get the idea what am saying, cars can never take out so much acceleration of the line the bike's can, one of my single cylinder 150cc bike *ucked my 1100cc 4 cylinder car off the line, and it was a drag and untill the bike touched a bloody 138 :D, which happened to be the near tope speed number it was succesful in keepin the car behind :) cars are just so useless though :P
Sameer2762 10 months ago
@hutton4059
btw, notice again :D the car was almost a bike ahead of the the bike when bike got off the mark! ;))
Sameer2762 10 months ago
lol the f1 sounds like obnoxious little kid tearing shit up, while the mellow bike is like a dad chasing lethargically and reluctantly after his child
deadlyvirusgiver 11 months ago 4
F1 car destroy anything round a track but motoGP bike is faster up a straight. fact. check top speeds on larger tracks... the GP bikes come out of the corners slower and have to brake well earlier but GP bikes still manage to record a higher speed up the long straights. Bullshitters keep the fanmail and go google lap times and speeds
nutsack1888 11 months ago
@nutsack1888 thats because formula 1 cars have huge ammounts of downforce which creates drag, where as bikes have very little downforce and aerodynamical grip, bikes are all about mechanical grip. If you take the wing off a formula one car, it can go over 400kph easily
animeonperseest 10 months ago
Comment removed
nutsack1888 10 months ago
Comment removed
nutsack1888 10 months ago
@nutsack1888 The Zonda R isn't that fast... Depending on the track, for example, MONZA GP, I am pretty sure a moto gp bike would take that based on accelleration alone. Ive never seen real specs on a moto gp bikes acceleration, but if it can do 124mph in 3.8secs then mayybe it could beat an F1 car. But then its lead would disappear the moment they had to brake.. Hahaha.
sexyitalian891 10 months ago
Minute 1:00 = the sexiest down shifts i have ever heard. pants need changing.
DomDson 11 months ago 38
Minute 1:03 = the sexiest down shifts i have ever heard. pants need changing.
DomDson 11 months ago
one of the biggest stereotypes is that cars will always beat bikes around a track.
Yet there are plenty of videos of professionals racing ducatis against ferraris, lambos and other various sports cars and they win, some by over 4-10secs.
Why?, because assuming that the car will win just because it has 4 wheels is a generalisation, bikes have beaten cars and vice versa, it depends on the track.
As for F1 beating a bike, no surprise, F1 has a bigger power to weight ratio and downforce.
wolfyys 11 months ago
@wolfyys
Simple fact is, cars have 2 more wheels than bikes, meaning that cars can transport twice as much energy to the ground than a motorcycle.
So take a bike and a car with exactly the same power/weight ratio and put 2 professional race drivers/riders in/on them, who race them at exactly 100% (which will not be possible) and youll see, that a car will always be faster.
Racing suspension and tyres shouldnt need further mention.
KingSams0n 11 months ago
@KingSams0n
You didnt read my last sentence did you? Making a car have an equal power to weight of a bike effectively turns it into a race car. = Formula 1
Again, its a generalization to assume that a car will win just because it has 4 wheels. and for a conventional supercar to have an equal power to weight ratio with a bike, its power would have to be over 1500bhp, far too high for the road even for a supercar.
wolfyys 11 months ago
@KingSams0n Not to mention, even if you give a ferrari an equal power to weight ratio, your assuming just because it has so, it will win.
Again, that is a generalization, why?, because the car wasn't designed for it. Look at the Atom V8 500BHP vs S1000RR, both had the same power to weight but the car didn't "slaughter the bike", it won by barely a second. why? because its power was simply too great for the car, it wasn't designed for it.
wolfyys 11 months ago
@wolfyys
I never said a car would slaughter the bike, it just would be faster.
By how far it'd be faster I cant say.
To me it's just a matter of fact, put to racers on both vehicles going to their absolute limit and assume, you could totally eliminate the possibilty of human errors, in my opinion the car'd be faster.
It's just like that a bike has to brake twice as early as a car.
I mean, just compare braking points of F1 and MotoGP on the same track, you'd be astonished.
Nvthelss, just my op.
KingSams0n 11 months ago 2
@KingSams0n There is no denying an F1 car could slaughter even a motogp bike. They were built to have a greater power to weight ratio and have the aerodynamics and setup for it to make the most of this absurd amount of power, including huge wheels.
My point is, an average sports car, this includes supercars have mainly between 400-600bhp. They are set up optimally for that kind of power. If you turbo them to a 1:1 ratio like a bike, it doesn't mean the car will win.
wolfyys 11 months ago
@KingSams0n
A good example is a super saloon like the BMW M5 or Audi RS6, despite having great brakes, suspension and in many cases MORE power than most supercars, they still lose to them around a track.
Often supercars don't weigh much less either.
wolfyys 11 months ago
@KingSams0n ok based on your theory please explain how the bikes can trash anything at isle of man???? even norma BMW racers get left for dust. Over a large distance of very slow and very fast bends the bike works best. Round a small track a single seat race car has advantage. Also it costs hundreds of thousands for a car that matches bikes pow/weight ratio. Your argument is flawed but i will agree this bike have no chance against F1 car.. this vids silly
nutsack1888 10 months ago
@nutsack1888
Of course this discussion is completely bullocks, I guess you agree to that.
But I personally think that even on the IoM a car would be faster.
And of course I talk about single seat cars.
I mean, racebike vs race car @ the same p/w ratio and the same skill level of both drivers, the car would be faster.
if you can adjust the bike's supsension, you can adjust the car's one too.
Always in mind, that both pilots are absolutely familiar with the track.
KingSams0n 10 months ago 2
@KingSams0n no car can touch a bike over the full man course. i know coz i live here and its fact.. its been tried and tried again and the only thing close is a single seater Norma powered by bmw. I stated it as fact coz it is a FACT.. no arguments please kingsamson. Ive devoted 10years of my life to this shithole so I know exactly whats the fastest thing round it.
nutsack1888 10 months ago
thumbs up if you like this bike from the song "ima be" by black eye peas
ivymae2012 11 months ago
People, understand that your road bike is not a race bike. The front suspension from an Aprilia RSV4 Moto GP bike costs more than the Aprilia RSV4 factory roadbike itself.
pacrat90 11 months ago 37
@pacrat90 you mean superbike? not motogp bike;) the only manufactures in motogp are: honda, ducati, yamaha and suzuki
Lexinho90 11 months ago
@Lexinho90 that :)
pacrat90 11 months ago
@pacrat90 there is no "Aprilia RSV4 Moto GP bike"... sorry
gjhgjfd 10 months ago 4
@pacrat90 Except Aprilia does not compete in the MotoGP category *_* .I'm going to assume you mean WSBK(world super bike) However I would like to see how a real MotoGP bike would fair against an F1 Car. I'm sure F1 would win but would be fun to see nonetheless.
Linkgt 4 months ago
bike = £12000
cars steering wheel = £25000
...ill have a couple of bikes please
wokennightmare 11 months ago
@Angelus12308 yeah u right... i wonder... who have the balls to ride a BMW S 1000 to the fullest...
pandir87 1 year ago
bikes=shit
theredrooter 1 year ago
@theredrooter LOL Troll
select899 1 year ago
@theredrooter race me
YourGuardianMarine 1 year ago
F1 stock or not will win any bike with any rider on it.... atleast in a normal race racing in a racetrack because F1 has the physics on its side.. it can take enormous Gs on the turns and brake instandly... if you try to brake instandly a bike you will catapulting yourself a few meters infront of it.. also if you try to turn a bike with many Kms on it (G presure) you probably will eat the dust...
Thats why F1 easily will win any bike.. even if the F1 has lower Top speed than the bike
Emeengor 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ariel Atom V8 (Production Car) Vs BMW S1000RR (Production Bike)... Car Wins!
rdmppp1985 1 year ago
Ariel Atom V8 (Production Car) Vs BMW S1000RR (Production Bike)... Car Wins!
rdmppp1985 1 year ago
@rdmppp1985
Pretty sure that Ariel costs £150,000 or so? To buy a motogp bike it costs the same without testing.
Still it was a good race on TopGear but they had to make the car win.
bakels123 1 year ago
can't compare the 2!!! haha stupidest vs ever! that car would crash anything else it's challanged with!! even a fuck in Jet! lol
Bassmanonmasa 1 year ago
I'm fairly certain that is Kubica driving the Sauber.
ChrisButchie 1 year ago
thats like $2,000,000 car vs a $100,000 bike depending on race class!
CWellman9345 1 year ago
@Angelus12308
we only have 2 balls max.. :p
bostard25 1 year ago
LA MOTO LO QUE NECESITA ES PILOTO
christian6623 1 year ago
Isn´t that Robert Kubica ?
VR46Nico 1 year ago
1:02 = butt sex
AGPELASTE 1 year ago
Great Video :) Thx
bayvaraa 1 year ago
you know whats funny, this is even a BMW S which is consider like 2 class open wheel car,is wrong what people say, THIS IS NOT A F1 car,its a open wheel car for the class of BMW, open wheel sport have many leguage ,Karting, Formula 3,Formula Ford, Formula 300, ect, and Formula 1 that is suppose to represent the best in racing sport
Ryosuke324 1 year ago
Are people all now officially idiots? 'fisical'?? Get off youtube @rideemfast55 and go to school!
newts40 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2 wheels vs 4 wheels on curves no mach only on straight road is fair test.
cybercorfu 1 year ago
Comment removed
cybercorfu 1 year ago
ill still take a street legal bike. f1 is just a dream, but damn its a fast dream lol
worldtravel101 1 year ago 2
R1 a 299km/h - /watch?v=lYIan9qAcqg
lucas13lol 1 year ago
how the hell do you beat a f1 car? i love bikes, but they just don't come close.
aznmav2 1 year ago
@aznmav2 it beats it on price, u cant buy an f1 car, but the bike is a years wages! bikes for me, (not BMW though)
thesiknik 1 year ago
a formule-1 car is more spoiler than car...
sjoukje446 1 year ago
It no beginner that drives that F1. Take valentino rossi on that bike and its another story
Frallan86 1 year ago
@Frallan86 the bike would still be raped
andreveiguinha 1 year ago
@Frallan86 take Michael Schumacker and will be another story!
Ryosuke324 1 year ago
it should be against a motogp bike not a bmw 1000rr..not fair battle
EvolutionIXRR 1 year ago
@EvolutionIXRR that wouldn't matter, nothing can beat an F1 car on a track not even an attack hellicopter.
mrdarkknight 1 year ago
@mrdarkknight of course but a least fair battle. On a track with helicopter? helicopter wins of course cuz it doesnt need to take corners, it can just fly straight to the finish from the start.
EvolutionIXRR 1 year ago 2
@EvolutionIXRR Ugh, I'm talking if it's going to follow the racing line.
mrdarkknight 1 year ago
@EvolutionIXRR yes, car would win, but very true,
thesiknik 1 year ago
Right the Superbike isn't a Grand Prix machine (Not a Formula 1 Bike, that would be a Motogp BIKE
So this video isN'T 100% FAIR, JUST BMW PR
blondboyharrison 1 year ago
I'd love to see a drag race between the two. Those cars give me goose bumps. :-D
ChocThunda69 1 year ago
To all you people who say the bike rider is shit your just jelous and cant hack that a bike lost for once, Troy Corser is not a shit rider.
sarlaz123 1 year ago
@sarlaz123 the bike rider isn't shit, it's just physics. the guy on the bike is battling against limited traction and centrifugal force. f1 doesn't have this problem, there is no way a sport bike can be a match.
graknor 1 year ago
@graknor never said he was shit, im defending him against ppl thinking this is an actual race, if it was, Troy corser still could not win sadly, F1 is too fast. I'm glad you see it my way
sarlaz123 1 year ago
I call drag race for pinks! haha
leighsa49 1 year ago
As much as I LOVE bikes, they just can't hang with a F1 car....them things r crazy fast
speedemon103 1 year ago
I've fired up two S1000RR bikes. No bike in my opinion gives you the chills right down your spine as this one does!
lczspeed1 1 year ago
look at the end bit were the bike starts off hes keeping up with the f1 car probs in a drag race the bike might just have a little chance hehehehehehe
mbknitro100 1 year ago
@mbknitro100 a little small, very small chance
andreveiguinha 1 year ago
how much rpm does the f1 car have
5959512 1 year ago
@5959512
the top's at 20k.They usualy shift at 18k!And it's a 3000cc engine :D:D:D So you can imagine the sound it makes at top end!
clabucet 1 year ago
@5959512 18,000rpm
vxAREKxv 1 year ago
@vxAREKxv holy shit !
5959512 1 year ago
1:14 REMATCH lol
zlyable 1 year ago
the F1 is faster... but the Bike looks so much better...
7emanuele7 1 year ago 2
I am sorry but that bike did not shift at the start properly, I know it would never win but the F1 cars don't beat bikes 0-60
Robbyb321 1 year ago
@Robbyb321 they do
Catchaontheflipsyde 1 year ago
@Robbyb321 yes the do, renault r25, 0-60 mph 1.9s 0-120 4.5s 0-180 8.6s
andreveiguinha 1 year ago
@Robbyb321 yes i spotted that too, the car was dropping clutch while troy was still lifting a foot to put it in 1st gear didnt even have throttle open when car was taking off and he still made the car look ''not so fast as they say''
thesiknik 1 year ago
@Angelus12308 good point you are right the difference between an stock bike and a race bike is basicly the same now the difference between an street car and a race car is aloooot
tinleo333 1 year ago
@tinleo333 stock bike to race bike is a huge difference, 10k bike from showroom has another 100k spent on it!
thesiknik 1 year ago
wait wait please
tinleo333 1 year ago
2 Wheels never can beat 4 wheels! noobb motocycles:D
andreimolist 1 year ago
@andreimolist actually this is the only situation where bikes dont win
CBAUSERNAME 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She is lonely mom seeking for a man naneedj.info
waruniimalka 1 year ago
Production car(any Corvette, Ferrari, Lambo) vs. production bike(s1000rr, cbr 1000, gsxr1000, zx 10, 1198, r1) and the bike will win. Race bike(moto gp) vs. Race car (f1)and the car will win.
ridemfast55 1 year ago 29
@ridemfast55 your wrong will win in your head,you know why?cuz the fisical effort is more in a bike to push it to the limit than in a car,is been proven that after laps any regular bike driver cant push the same,which is not the care for a car, that the only limitation is the overheating of the tires.
Ryosuke324 1 year ago
Comment removed
mark675 1 year ago
@mark675 why you have to insult people for your lack of knowledge,why cant you bring points that have sense,if your going to reply this type of coment just to say something, limit yourself to listen what people have to say,so you can talk with facts.
Ryosuke324 1 year ago
@Ryosuke324 ive got more knowledge than youll ever have and if you call that insulting ur a very sensitive person i didnt even say nothing to insult you! haha
if your gonna answer people make sure u know what your talking about
mark675 1 year ago
@mark675 do you even know what DUMB ASS is?,do you even know me to call me a DUMB ASS?,and if you have any knowledge in anything, show it not in a DUMB ASS nonsense meaning reply, lets talk about motorsport,lets see who have read and watch more!
Ryosuke324 1 year ago
@Ryosuke324 who gives a fuck.. go bore someone else u thick cunt
mark675 1 year ago
@ridemfast55
Yes, and that's because the moto gp bikes isn't THAT far ahead the street bikes, performance and weight wise. The street bikes are almost as tuned-up as they can be, and still reliable.
If you on the otherside, compare an F1 to a Lambo, then the F1 are miles apart from the Lambo. Just loook at it! The F1 has soo much traction, and a bike will never match that. The bikes biggest advantage has always been the power/weight ratio, but a F1, has almost the same...
Still, bikes all day
Swedish2strokerider 1 year ago
@ridemfast55
sorry i am a bike fan too but a stock r1 has no chance against a murcelago....
spikemaster1990 1 year ago
@ridemfast55 Ariel Atom disagrees.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
Ariel Atom can hardly be called a production car. It is a boutique sports car, not a Vauxhall Nova.
Rainb0wSeven 1 year ago
@Rainb0wSeven Is it in production or not? Yes it is, so it stands to reason that it's a production car.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
Riiight, so a Bugatti Veyron is also a "production" car, is it? Idiot.
Rainb0wSeven 1 year ago
@Rainb0wSeven You need to look up the definition of production then, because the Bugatti Veyron is well known to be the most expensive and fastest production car ever. If a car is being produced and sold, it's a production car. It's really not that hard a concept to grasp.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
By your definition, any Formula 1 car is also a "production" car. Idiot.
Rainb0wSeven 1 year ago
@Rainb0wSeven Formula 1 cars aren't produced for the commercial market. Anyone with enough money can go to a shop and buy a Bugatti or an Ariel Atom. They are produced for the commercial market, and so are called a production car.
Are you a Christian or Muslim by any chance? You certainly come across as having the kind of "waa waa I'm not listening" attitude that is common amongst the faithful.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
Hahaha! - "Anyone with enough money" can buy a Formula 1 car. And are you really trying to compare a $1.5 million car with a Ford Focus? You are a fuckwit.
Rainb0wSeven 1 year ago
@Rainb0wSeven No. I'm owning you, but you seem oblivious to that. I didn't say that anybody with enough money can't buy a Formula 1 car, partly because it would be untrue. You just seem to really be struggling to comprehend that both a Ford Focus and a Bugatti Veyron could both be made for the same purpose: to be sold on the commercial market. That doesn't mean they have to be the same colour, the same price, or have the same performance figures, as you think they do.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
No. A car that is made for multimillionaires cannot be considered a "production" car, nor is it made for the "commercial market". If Bugatti was making thousands of Veyrons each year, you could legitimately call it a production car. They aren't, though, so it isn't.
By your definition of "production", NASA's Space Shuttle is a production vehicle.
Again: you are a fuckwit.
Rainb0wSeven 1 year ago
@Rainb0wSeven Yeah, obviously. A car that's made for millionaires couldn't possibly be road legal, be available on the open market, and be produced and sold by commercial outlets. English obviously isn't your first language, as your definition of "production" is way off the mark, and you've failed to read my comments properly. I suggest you go and study the language more. Then you won't make such silly mistakes, and won't appeal foolish when you lose your temper after being shown your mistakes.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
I've read your comments and understood them perfectly well. It's just that you are an idiot whose definition of "production car" is all-inclusive, which is ridiculous.
BTW, my English comprehension is far better than yours, as evidenced by you writing, "and won't APPEAL foolish".
I reiterate: you are a fuckwit. No-one with any modicum of intelligence would agree with you that a $1.5 million, hand built supercar is a "production car".
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Rainb0wSeven 1 year ago
@Rainb0wSeven When you start picking out basic typos to try and score points, you've just admitted defeat. If I were that petty I would point out the incorrect usage of the comma and lack of appropriate hyphen in that last comment, but there's no need to. According to you, it would be the English language that is wrong, and not you. By the way, I'm not even using my definition of a production car. I'm using the automotive industry's definition. Argue with them if you disagree.
Harmonyww 1 year ago
@Harmonyww
Uh-huh. You obviously *are* "that petty", not to mention "completely wrong". And a fuckwit.
Rainb0wSeven 11 months ago
@Rainb0wSeven And you're an inarticulate troll that can't differentiate between mass production and production. Got anything else to say, apart from banal insults? Thought not.
Harmonyww 11 months ago
Jessus Christ, the bike rider is a real pussy!
kafor1999 1 year ago
@kafor1999 Are u serious? about 50 race wins in World Superbike, about 14 track lap records 12th in championship of 2010 World Superbikes, winning World Superbike Championship in 1996 and 2005!
WTF? Troy Corsar is a bad ass muther fucker on a shit bike!
thesiknik 1 year ago
schumacher is on the bike!! thats why.
target007 1 year ago 3
you can't get an F1 car, not a new one.
However, instead a bike get a bicycle it is even cheaper
toni2mito 1 year ago
my nan could ride faster than xaus on that bmw
joecj1 1 year ago
@joecj1 haha nice
xplorer110 1 year ago
Idiots. Like comparing the best PC/MAC/Linux home PC to the worlds fastest super computers. Pointless. Even comparing a super-Vyron/super-SSC etc to a £12k motobike is dumb.
If you want a car that isn't road legal, can't deal with a speed bumps, can't take your take your missus and requires a support team plus and engine rebuild/change every 300 miles then yeah, an F1 car is great. Oh, and it depreciates massively after a few races.
I love F1 but duhhh. Lorry V F1 tug-o-war duhhhh
tubulartumour 1 year ago 2
that bike didnt even had a change now i will like to see a motogp bike and a f1 race that would be nice
1gnasty 1 year ago
@1gnasty
search for : Jenson Button vs Dani Pedrosa - F1 vs GP motorcycle
and you will see what an F1 car is doing with your moto gp´s ;)
vorlost2 1 year ago
@vorlost2
i seen that but i will like to see a full lap aroud the track i know the gp bikes are slower but i will like to see how much
1gnasty 1 year ago
@vorlost2 it's got 4 wheels?????????? what du expect, its like racing a hosre against an osterich or a dog agaionst a human???
thesiknik 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1gnasty
"i will like to see a motogp bike and a f1 race that would be nice"
silverstone 2010 pole laps:
formula 1 = 1:29.6
motoGP = 2:03.3
do you really want to see that?
joyfulvulture 1 year ago
the F1 is like eating up the track..
azrock1984 1 year ago
fastest vehicle goes to the car driver
biggest balls goes to the bike rider
#LOL
worldtravel101 1 year ago 3
This was BMW motorsports publicity event. Rider and Driver were both professional. The laws of physics prevents any race motorcycle from beating a F1 car on the track. F1 vehicles have about the same or better power to weight ratio of a motorcycle + 4 giant gummy tires + brakes that will give you 4-6 neg G's and Aerodynamics to push you down for faster corner. A track record like Laguna Seca is ~1:07 for F1 and 1:24 for race bike. Do the math. F1 lap bike every 4 laps.
papayasalad2002 1 year ago
Just what I thought would happen
600RRboyJay 1 year ago
F-1 isn't even a car. . . its a rocket with four wheels! Not a race at all.
Mininova5 1 year ago 2
Different outcome with a CBR
90tegra 1 year ago
@90tegra Haha a CBR would have no chance!
mdr279 1 year ago
@mdr279
MrDabantico 1 year ago
@90tegra yeah it certainly would be a different out come with a CBR..... it would be a ton SLOWER!!
irontruck 1 year ago
@irontruck the cbr is faster than the bmw??? i dont understand ur comment
thesiknik 1 year ago
lan adalet bu şimdi
ademdel1 1 year ago